Efficacy and Complications of Intravitreal Rituximab Injection for Treating Primary Vitreoretinal Lymphoma

Acute Sterile Endophthalmitis Following Intravitreal Rituximab Injection in Primary Vitreoretinal Lymphoma: Case Series

OBJECTIVE OR PURPOSE

To describe sterile endophthalmitis following intravitreal rituximab (Rituxan, Genentech) injection for treatment of vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL).

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

SUBJECTS, PARTICIPANTS, AND/OR CONTROLS

Medical records of biopsy-proven VRL patients who received intravitreal rituximab (RTX) between January 2011 and December 2021 in Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan were reviewed. 3 patients presented with sterile endophthalmitis after the second dose of intravitreal RTX were included.Methods, Intervention, or Testing: Intravitreal methotrexate (400µg/0.1ml) and rituximab (1mg/0.1ml) injections given a week apart, monthly.Main Outcome Measures: Clinical presentation and response to treatment including visual acuity, degree of inflammation and intraocular pressure .

RESULTS

All cases had bilateral disease and received the first dose of intravitreal RTX without any side effects. All cases developed bilateral corneal edema with Descemet's folds, mutton-fat keratic precipitates, anterior chamber and vitreous cells with hazy fundus view approximately within 1 week after the second RTX injection. Intraocular pressures were increased in Cases 2 and 3. Clinical findings improved to baseline with topical corticosteroid therapy within 1 month in all cases, and additional topical antiglaucomatous medication in Cases 2 and 3. Additionally, Case 1 received the third dose of RTX injection to the right eye 1 month after the second injection and repeating dense anterior chamber and vitreous cells developed in 1 day. Her vision decreased to counting fingers from 20/40, and intraocular pressure increased. After topical steroids and antiglaucomatous medications, her intraocular inflammation subsided. Her vision improved to 20/30, and intraocular pressure became normal in the right eye.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first case series documenting sterile endophthalmitis following intravitreal rituximab in vitreoretinal lymphoma. Recognition of sterile endophthalmitis is important in differentiating from vitreoretinal lymphoma recurrence and infectious endophthalmitis. Close observation and topical steroid drops seem to be effective.

Anterior segment involvement in vitreoretinal lymphoma: clinical manifestations, molecular findings and in vivo confocal microscopy

BACKGROUND

Intermediate and posterior manifestations of vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) are well characterised. However, there is limited information on anterior segment involvement in VRL. This study aimed to describe the anterior manifestations of VRL, and their association with molecular testing.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with biopsy-proven VRL. Study variables included anterior segment manifestations, findings from slit-lamp photos and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) when available. MYD88 L265P mutation and cytology in the aqueous humour, retinal and systemic findings were also analysed.

RESULTS

The analysis included 108 eyes of 55 VRL patients. Anterior segment involvement was present in at least one visit in 55 eyes (51%) of 33 patients (60%); it included keratic precipitates (dendritiform with branching and irregular margins in 33 eyes, dust-like in 16 eyes and large granulomatous in 12 eyes), cells in the anterior chamber (51 eyes) and posterior synechiae (2 eyes). IVCM was available for 41 eyes and showed different morphologies of keratic precipitates, including floral, spikes and mulberry patterns (66%, 56% and 20%, respectively). MYD88 L265P mutation in the aqueous humour was detected in 10/21 (48%) eyes with no anterior segment involvement and 24/37 (65%) eyes with anterior segment involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior segment manifestations are often present in VRL and include dendritiform and dust-like keratic precipitates. IVCM in VRL can identify different patterns associated with keratic precipitates. MYD88 L265P mutation in the aqueous humour of VRL patients can also be found in eyes without significant anterior segment involvement.

A comprehensive overview of diagnosis, imaging and treatment of vitreoretinal lymphoma

Vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) is a rare B-cell intraocular neoplasia characterized by poor long-term prognosis and lack of effective therapies. It mainly involves the vitreous humor, the retina, and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), although anterior segment involvement can occur. VRL is classified as a lymphoma of immune privileged sites, along with testis lymphoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). VRL and PCNSL are strictly connected indeed: 80% of VRL develop PCNSL, while 20% of patients with PCNSL present VRL during natural history of lymphoma. Due to the lack of worldwide consensus about diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up timing, VRL represents one of the most challenging ocular affections.VRL commonly masquerades as a posterior uveitis, and misdiagnosis often occurs because of partial response to topical steroids. Gold standard for diagnosis is cytological analysis of vitreous humor. However, this technique lacks sensitivity and supplemental molecular analyses can improve the diagnostic process. Multimodal imaging allows ophthalmologists to empower their clinical suspicion and a comprehensive examination can highlight typical features of VRL and justify further invasive procedures.There is no consensus about VRL therapy, and none of the therapeutical scheme has demonstrated to prevent cerebral involvement and improve patient's overall survival. Intravitreal injections of chemotherapeutics drugs, ocular radiation therapy and systemic chemotherapy can be considered in the treatment of VRL. Once cerebral involvement occurs, systemic chemotherapy must be included in the treatment as a life-saving therapy. Further multicentric studies are required to find out the best treatment of patients with VRL.

Occlusive Vasculitis Following Intravitreal Rituximab Injection for Primary Vitreoretinal Lymphoma

PURPOSE

We report three cases of occlusive vasculitis following intravitreal rituximab therapy for biopsy-proven primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL), one of which was following an injection of the biosimilar Riabni (rituximab-arrx, AmGen) and two of which were following an injection of Rituxan (rituximab, Genentech).

METHODS

Case series.

RESULTS

Three cases of occlusive vasculitis confirmed with fluorescein angiography are reported 5 days, 8 days, and 3.5 weeks following intravitreal injection of rituximab. The initial vision was poor (20/500, 20/150, and light perception), but vision recovered to baseline in two cases, and remained poor in the case of combined artery and vein occlusion.

CONCLUSION

Occlusive vasculitis is a rarely reported but potential complication of intravitreal rituximab therapy in patients who have been previously treated with the agent and may have delayed onset. A low threshold for fluorescein angiography as a diagnostic test for post-injection vision loss and prompt treatment with topical and/or oral steroids should be considered.

Efficacy and safety of first-line combination therapy versus monotherapy for vitreoretinal lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) is usually treated with a combination of intraocular methotrexate (ioMTX), high-dose intravenous methotrexate (HD-MTX), or local radiotherapy (RT) as the first options. The effectiveness and safety of monotherapy like bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) for PVRL remain uncertain.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trial data and conference abstracts in VRL patients treated with first-line combination therapy or monotherapy were conducted through a search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases until December 2022. A total of 24 studies comprising 517 patients were included, and survival data were extracted from 279 patients due to inconsistent units across studies.

RESULTS

The combined treatment group used ioMTX + chemotherapy (in 4 studies), RT + chemotherapy (in 2 studies), ioMTX/HD-MTX based regimen (in 2 studies), ioMTX + RT + chemotherapy (in 2 studies), ioMTX + lenalidomide/BTKi (in 2 studies) and combination of multiple therapies (in 7 studies). The monotherapy group was mainly treated with oral monotherapies such as BTKi. The combination therapy had a higher overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR) than monotherapy (ORR: 96% vs. 72%, CRR: 92% vs. 63%). Combination therapy also resulted in a longer median progression-free survival (28.8 months vs. 13 months, p = 0.012). However, the combination therapy group had more severe side effects (grade 3/4 toxicity) than the monotherapy group (45% vs. 8%).

CONCLUSION

The study showed combination therapy had better OR and CR rates, longer survival, and more toxicity than monotherapy. While BTK inhibitors were well-tolerated, long-term effectiveness needs confirmation from prospective studies. In addition, given the small number of studies of monotherapy for VRL, more studies are needed to validate its effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

CRD42023400305.

Immunomodulatory and Antioxidant Drugs in Glaucoma Treatment

Glaucoma, a group of diseases characterized by progressive retinal ganglion cell loss, cupping of the optic disc, and a typical pattern of visual field defects, is a leading cause of severe visual impairment and blindness worldwide. Elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is the leading risk factor for glaucoma development. However, glaucoma can also develop at normal pressure levels. An increased susceptibility of retinal ganglion cells to IOP, systemic vascular dysregulation, endothelial dysfunction, and autoimmune imbalances have been suggested as playing a role in the pathophysiology of normal-tension glaucoma. Since inflammation and oxidative stress play a role in all forms of glaucoma, the goal of this review article is to present an overview of the inflammatory and pro-oxidant mechanisms in the pathophysiology of glaucoma and to discuss immunomodulatory and antioxidant treatment approaches.

Signaling pathways driving ocular malignancies and their targeting by bioactive phytochemicals

Ocular cancers represent a rare pathology. The American Cancer Society estimates that 3,360 cases of ocular cancer occur annually in the United States. The major types of cancers of the eye include ocular melanoma (also known as uveal melanoma), ocular lymphoma, retinoblastoma, and squamous cell carcinoma. While uveal melanoma is one of the primary intraocular cancers with the highest occurrence in adults, retinoblastoma remains the most common primary intraocular cancer in children, and squamous cell carcinoma presents as the most common conjunctival cancer. The pathophysiology of these diseases involves specific cell signaling pathways. Oncogene mutations, tumor suppressor mutations, chromosome deletions/translocations and altered proteins are all described as causal events in developing ocular cancer. Without proper identification and treatment of these cancers, vision loss, cancer spread, and even death can occur. The current treatments for these cancers involve enucleation, radiation, excision, laser treatment, cryotherapy, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy. These treatments present a significant burden to the patient that includes a possible loss of vision and a myriad of side effects. Therefore, alternatives to traditional therapy are urgently needed. Intercepting the signaling pathways for these cancers with the use of naturally occurring phytochemicals could be a way to relieve both cancer burden and perhaps even prevent cancer occurrence. This research aims to present a comprehensive review of the signaling pathways involved in various ocular cancers, discuss current therapeutic options, and examine the potential of bioactive phytocompounds in the prevention and targeted treatment of ocular neoplasms. The current limitations, challenges, pitfalls, and future research directions are also discussed.

Intravitreal Rituximab-Associated Retinal Occlusive Vasculitis

Purpose

To describe a 90-year-old patient who was referred to a private retina specialist with gradually worsening vision and floaters in the left eye.

Methods

A retrospective case report is presented.

Results

The patient was treated with intravitreal rituximab injections for intraocular lymphoma with resulting vision loss to the level of hand motions from severe granulomatous uveitis and retinal occlusive vasculitis.

Conclusions

Retinal occlusive vasculopathy secondary to rituximab intravitreal injections is a rare clinical entity with only a single previous case reported in the literature. However, there are reports of systemic vasculitis after systemic administration of rituximab. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of ocular hypertension, granulomatous anterior uveitis, and/or retinal occlusive vasculitis after intravitreal rituximab use. Consideration should be given to the inflammatory risk of rituximab intravitreal injections to reduce the potential for treatment-induced vision loss.

European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) guidelines for treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL)

The management of primary central nervous system (PCNSL) is one of the most controversial topics in neuro-oncology because of the complexity of the disease and the limited number of controlled studies available. In 2021, given recent advances and the publication of practice-changing randomized trials, the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) created a multidisciplinary task force to update the previously published evidence-based guidelines for immunocompetent adult patients with PCNSL and added a section on immunosuppressed patients. The guideline provides consensus considerations and recommendations for the treatment of PCNSL, including intraocular manifestations and specific management of the elderly. The main changes from the previous guideline include strengthened evidence for the consolidation with ASCT in first-line treatment, prospectively assessed chemotherapy combinations for both young and elderly patients, clarification of the role of rituximab even though the data remain inconclusive, of the role of new agents, and the incorporation of immunosuppressed patients and primary ocular lymphoma. The guideline should aid the clinicians in everyday practice and decision making and serve as a basis for future research in the field.

Insights From the Eye for Patients With Kidney Transplant

The eye and the kidney share structural and developmental similarities on a cellular and clinical level, and they are often affected by the same disease processes. Performing an eye exam to look for signs of conditions such as hypertension and diabetes can provide a helpful window into the health of the kidney. Patients with kidney transplants (KT) are a unique population that require close monitoring. These patients are maintained on a number of immunosuppressive medications and may face complications such as medication side effects, infections, and graft rejection. Patients with KT are at higher risk of both infectious and noninfectious eye conditions related to underlying systemic disease or use of immunosuppressive medications. Screening for eye conditions is important because preserving visual function is integral to quality of life, and also because the eye exam can help with early detection and treatment of systemic conditions. Here we describe some of the common eye findings and conditions in patients with KT. We recommend that patients with KT receive annual eye exams, and we hope that the information provided here can help nephrologists become more familiar with eye findings and identify situations where a referral to ophthalmology is warranted.

[Clinical procedures for intraocular lymphomas]

BACKGROUND

The classification of intraocular lymphomas is based on their anatomical location. They are divided into uveal lymphomas with involvement of the choroid, ciliary body or iris and vitreoretinal lymphomas with isolated or combined involvement of the vitreous body and/or retina. Over the last decades it has become increasingly possible to work out the clinical and pathobiological features of the various subtypes, thereby reducing the diagnostic hurdles and creating improved treatment options.

OBJECTIVE

A summary of the various types of intraocular lymphoma in terms of clinical features, diagnostics, treatment and prognosis is given as well as recommendations for follow-up care.

METHODS

A selective literature search was carried out on the subject of intraocular lymphomas using PubMed and Google Scholar.

RESULTS

Intraocular lymphomas affect different structures, so that the symptoms can also be very different. The diagnostic spectrum ranges from typical ocular examination methods to sample biopsies with subsequent cytological, histological and molecular pathological processing. The treatment pillars available are percutaneous irradiation and intravitreal drug administration as local treatment and systemic treatment or a combination of systemic and local treatment. The prognosis depends mainly on the subtype of the lymphoma and the extent of the infestation when the diagnosis is confirmed. Even though some effective treatment options are now available, it has not yet been possible to significantly reduce the mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

Many different options are available for the diagnostics and treatment of intraocular lymphomas, which require close interdisciplinary cooperation. The further developments in the field of molecular pathology allow a faster and more accurate diagnosis and could open up new treatment options in the future.

Central Nervous System Progression in Primary Vitreoretinal Lymphoma with Bilateral and Unilateral Involvement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) is a rare disease with high mortality rates. It has a poor prognosis mainly because of its tendency to spread to the central nervous system (CNS). The optimal treatment strategy for PVRL is unknown; ideally, a treatment should prevent spread to the CNS, and thereby prolong overall survival. PVRL may occur in one eye (unilateral PVRL), or in both (bilateral). We reviewed studies from the scientific literature to investigate whether the risk of CNS progression differs between bilateral and unilateral PVRL. The quality of most available studies was moderate, at best. From the available studies, we found no difference in the development of CNS disease between patients with bilateral PVRL and unilateral PVRL.

Abstract

Background: Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) is either unilateral or bilateral at initial presentation. Progression to a central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma is regularly observed and these patients seem to have an inferior survival. Knowledge of the predictive value of laterality for CNS progression may facilitate risk stratification and the development of more effective treatment strategies, and eventually, improve outcomes. The objective of this analysis is to estimate the risk of CNS progression for patients with bilateral versus unilateral involvement of PVRL. Methods: Systematic literature search for studies on CNS progression in PVRL with bilateral and unilateral involvement according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We assessed the risk of bias and the methodological quality of studies using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Risk ratios of CNS progression in PVRL with bilateral and unilateral involvement were calculated and combined via a meta-analysis. Results: Twenty-five small-sized (total n = 371 cases) studies were included. The majority of the studies were at medium to high risk of bias. Results suggest no significant difference in CNS progression between bilateral and unilateral PVRL, with a pooled relative risk ratio of 1.12 (95% confidence interval 0.89–1.41). Conclusions: CNS progression is common in PVRL. From the limited available evidence, there is no significant difference in CNS progression between bilateral and unilateral PVRL.

A comprehensive review of intravitreal immunosuppressants and biologicals used in ophthalmology

Systemic immunosuppressants and biologicals have been a valuable tool in the treatment of inflammatory diseases and malignancies. The safety profile of these drugs has been debatable, especially in localized systems, such as the eye. This has led to the search for fairly local approaches, such as intravitreal, subconjunctival, and topical route of administration. Immunosuppressants have been used as a second-line drug in patients intolerable to corticosteroids or those who develop multiple recurrences on weaning corticosteroids. Similarly, biologicals have also been used as the next line of therapy, when adequate control of inflammation could not be attained or immunosuppressants were contraindicated to patients. Intravitreal immunosuppressants, such as methotrexate and sirolimus, have been extensively studied in noninfectious posterior uveitis, whereas limited studies have established the efficacy of intravitreal biologicals, such as infliximab and adalimumab. Most of these drugs have shown good safety profile and tolerability in animal studies alone and have not been studied further in human subjects. However, most of the studies in literature are single-case reports or case series which limits the level of evidence. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the mechanism of action, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, indications, efficacy, and side effects of different intravitreal immunosuppressants and biologicals that have been studied in literature.

A Review of Systemic Biologics and Local Immunosuppressive Medications in Uveitis

Uveitis is one of the most common causes of vision loss and blindness worldwide. Local and/or systemic immunosuppression is often required to treat ocular inflammation in noninfectious uveitis. An understanding of safety and efficacy of these medications is required to individualize treatment to each patient to ensure compliance and achieve the best outcome. In this article, we reviewed the effectiveness of systemic biologic response modifiers and local treatments commonly used in the management of patients with noninfectious uveitis.

Rapid, Spontaneous Resolution of Prominent Subretinal Infiltrate in Vitreoretinal Lymphoma

Purpose:

This case report describes a patient with vitreoretinal lymphoma who subacutely developed a large, peripapillary subretinal infiltrate that rapidly and spontaneously resolved.

Methods:

A case report is presented.

Results:

A 65-year-old Asian-American woman was referred for evaluation of a dense, peripapillary subretinal infiltrate in the left eye. A diagnostic vitrectomy revealed large, atypical lymphocytes with irregularly shaped nuclei, and mutational testing was positive for myeloid differentiation primary response 88 ( MYD88). Prior to surgery, the patient’s subretinal infiltrate had begun to resolve spontaneously, a process that continued after surgery without initiation of systemic or local ocular therapy.

Conclusions:

Patients with vitreoretinal lymphoma may present with transient, subretinal infiltrates that can resolve without treatment.

Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma: A diagnostic and management challenge

Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) is a rare form of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) arising in the intraocular compartment without brain involvement. Despite its apparent indolent clinical course, PVRL can cause permanent vision loss and CNS relapse, the major cause of death in PVRL patients. The pathophysiology of PVRL is unknown. As in PCNSL, the transformation of the tumor cells likely originates outside the CNS, before the cells migrate to the eye and proliferate within an immune-permissive microenvironment. PVRL exhibits a biased immunoglobulin repertoire, suggesting underlying antigen selection. The diagnosis remains challenging, requiring close coordination between ophthalmologists and cytologists. Because of their rarity and fragility in the vitreous, lymphoma cells cannot always be identified. Interleukin levels, molecular biology and imaging are used in combination with clinical ophthalmological examination to support the diagnosis of PVRL. Multi-institutional prospective studies are urgently needed to validate the equivocal conclusions regarding treatments drawn from heterogeneous retrospective or small cohort studies. Intravitreal injections of methotrexate or rituximab or local radiotherapy are effective at clearing tumor cells within the eyes but do not prevent CNS relapse. Systemic treatment based on high-dose methotrexate chemotherapy, with or without local treatment, might reduce this risk. At relapse, intensive consolidation chemotherapy followed by stem cell transplantation can be considered. Single-agent ibrutinib, lenalidomide and temozolomide treatments are effective in patients with relapsed PVRL and should be tested as first-line treatments. Therapeutic response assessment based on a clinical examination is improved by measuring cytokine levels but still needs to be refined.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma - ocular variant: an interdisciplinary review on management

Primary central nervous system lymphoma-ophthalmic variant (PCNSL-O) is an ocular subset of PCNSL predominantly involving subretinal pigment epithelium space, retina, and vitreous. The ophthalmic manifestations can precede, occur simultaneously, or follow other compartments of the CNS. Clinical trials have resulted in a significantly improved outcome in PCNSL patients over the past 2 decades, with a higher proportion of patients receiving frontline high dose methotrexate-based polychemotherapy regimens with curative intent; however, the current management of PCNSL-O remains controversial owing to lack of prospective data. The goals of PCNSL-O treatment are both to achieve local (ocular) control and to prevent tumor-specific mortality from further CNS involvement. Despite achieving high rates of ocular control with intravitreal agents like methotrexate and rituximab, the overall survival is poor, as 65-85% of patients eventually succumb to CNS disease. Few studies define the role of systemic chemotherapy with/without local treatment as a first line induction treatment for PCNSL-O considering limiting factors such as ocular penetration of systemically administered drugs and treatment related neurotoxicity. Also, the role of adjuvant treatment for PCNSL-O to prevent CNS progression and to improve overall survival is unknown. In this systematic review of the literature, we analyze treatment outcomes of various regimens (local, systemic, and combination) in terms of local control, CNS progression, and overall survival.

Intravitreal rituximab monotherapy for management of eyes with vitreoretinal lymphoma: initial experience from India

PURPOSE

To evaluate treatment outcomes and complications of intravitreal rituximab (IVR) monotherapy for eyes with vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with 'isolated primary VRL' or 'VRL with remission of systemic disease' and treated with IVR (1 mg/0.1 ml) between June 2014 and June 2019 were included in this retrospective, interventional case series. Injections were repeated at monthly intervals until complete resolution. All patients signed a written informed consent form. Institutional review board approval was obtained.

RESULTS

Twelve eyes of 7 patients with VRL were treated with 77 IVR injections at mean 6.42 injections per eye (median = 5; range = 2-13) for complete resolution at mean 8.16 ± 4.62 months (median = 6.97 months; range = 1.97-14.33 months). Mean age at presentation was 53.3 years (median = 54 years; range = 34-74 years). Patients were co-managed with medical oncologist and periodically evaluated. Complications included anterior uveitis (n = 6), raised intraocular pressure (n = 3), posterior synechiae (n = 2), vitreous haemorrhage (n = 1), pre-retinal haemorrhage (n = 1), retinal detachment (n = 1), posterior subcapsular cataract (n = 2) and sectoral iris atrophy (n = 1). Recurrences were seen in 3 eyes (25%), which eventually achieved complete resolution with treatment. None of the patients had systemic involvement or death during follow-up. Mean follow-up was 18.73 ± 8.83 months (median = 21.60 months; range = 7.37-32.67 months).

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal rituximab monotherapy is effective in management of vitreoretinal lymphoma in patients with isolated ocular disease.

Ocular surface complications of local anticancer drugs for treatment of ocular tumors

Local chemotherapy is increasingly used, either in combination with surgery or as monotherapy, for management of ocular tumors. Yet many of the local chemotherapeutic agents used for ocular tumors are cytotoxic drugs that are frequently associated with toxicities in normal ocular tissues. Understanding and managing these side effects are important because they affect treatment tolerability, outcome and quality of vision. Herein, we review local anticancer drugs administered for the treatment of ocular tumors, with an emphasis on their toxicities to the ocular surface, adnexa and lacrimal drainage system. We provide the underlying mechanisms and management strategies for the ocular side effects. Recent innovations in anticancer immunotherapy and ocular drug delivery systems also are discussed as new potential therapeutic modalities for alleviation of side effects.

Eye involvement in primary central nervous system lymphoma

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) may manifest initially in the eye (termed vitreoretinal lymphoma or VRL) or in non-ocular CNS compartments, or in both. The nature of the onset of PCNSL implies two clinical specialists - ophthalmologists and neuro-oncologists - independently may assess the primary presentation of this rare malignancy. Clinically relevant perspectives on expectations of PCNSL manifestation in both ocular and non-ocular CNS compartments would help inform management practices in each specialty, which should impact clinical outcomes. A recent increase in the number of published PCNSL cohort studies provides new opportunity to review the current prevalence rates of ocular involvement, and the timing of this involvement over the course of disease. In PCNSL cohorts defined by non-ocular CNS compartment involvement, with or without ocular involvement (termed "PCNSL ± ocular involvement" cohorts), mean rates of concomitant VRL at diagnosis, or at any time during the course, are 10% and 16%, respectively. Only a few individuals within this cohort group present with exclusive eye disease (<5%), and the rate of secondary ocular involvement is only 5-9%. In PCNSL cohorts defined by the involvement of the ocular compartment, with or without non-ocular CNS involvement (termed "VRL ± non-ocular CNS involvement" cohorts), 58% of persons have a primary ocular diagnosis, which carries a 50% risk of secondary involvement in the CNS beyond the eye. Rates of non-ocular CNS involvement with VRL at diagnosis or over the course of disease are 41% and 69%, respectively.

Ocular side effects of antirheumatic medications: a qualitative review

Topic

This paper reviews the ocular side effects of medications used in the treatment of rheumatological conditions.

Clinical relevance

Rheumatic diseases are inflammatory conditions that may affect the skin, blood vessels, joints, muscles and internal organs. Immunosuppressive agents are often used as treatment and while powerful, they carry side effects and toxicities that need careful monitoring. Ophthalmic complications have been reported with the use of antirheumatic medications; however, there is a lack of literature synthesising these reports. This paper addresses this gap and hopes to inform both rheumatologists and ophthalmologists as they work together on the management of patients with rheumatological conditions.

Methods

PubMed literature search was conducted from November to September 2019 searching for ocular side effects with the use of 25 rheumatological drugs.

Results

A total of 111 papers were included in this review. Adverse side effects were divided into non-infectious and infectious causes. Traditional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were associated with pruritus, irritation and dryness of the conjunctiva while biologic DMARDS showed reports of new-onset/recurrent uveitis and demyelinating conditions. Infectious side effects included episodes of cytomegalovirus retinitis, toxoplasmic chorioretinitis and endophthalmitis. Other serious side effects were encountered and included in this review.

Conclusion

The goal of this paper is to inform healthcare providers about potential ocular side effects from rheumatological medications. Healthcare providers are encouraged to learn more about these ophthalmic complications and find relevance within their clinical practice.

The use of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) in demonstrating recurrence of vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) in the anterior vitreous

Background

Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) is a rare disease with 30-380 new cases in the United States per year. Its insidious process and spread to the central nervous system (CNS) leads to a mean 5-year survival rate from 41.4 to 71%. Medical treatment of VRL has been summarized extensively in the literature and involves intraocular rituximab and methotrexate as first line agents in unilateral VRL, with systemic chemotherapy to be considered in bilateral or CNS-involving disease. In addition, therapeutic "debulking" vitrectomy has been reported in the literature, with some limited success. Despite this, recurrence rate is high and should always be suspected in the setting of new inflammation. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT) has not been previously used to image VRL recurrence in the anterior vitreous.

Case presentation

A 63-year-old man, with VRL was found to have cells and debris in the anterior vitreous, 10 months after his first vitrectomy, intravitreal rituximab and methotrexate. Since the patient was phakic at the time of initial vitrectomy, the anterior vitreous had not been removed. ASOCT confirmed the findings. Subsequent surgery removed the lens and debris. Both the patient's vision and ASOCT improved.

Conclusions

We suggest that ASOCT of the anterior segment is a useful diagnostic tool to monitor for recurrence of VRL. In biopsy-proven VRL, phakic patients who undergo therapeutic vitrectomy, should also be considered for lens extraction and anterior vitrectomy to limit recurrences.

Vitreoretinal lymphoma, secondary to non-CNS systemic lymphoma, masquerading as an infectious retinitis

Purpose

To report an atypical case of vitreoretinal lymphoma, secondary to non-central nervous system (non-CNS) systemic lymphoma, masquerading as an infectious retinitis.

Observations

A 76-year-old female with a history of cecal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with two prior occurrences of posterior segment ocular involvement presented with a complaint of blurry vision in the right eye. Exam findings were significant for large areas of retinal whitening and retinal hemorrhages in the absence of choroidal lesions or significant vitritis. The clinical suspicion of an infectious retinitis, was supported by a presumptive immunosuppressive state secondary to her recent treatment (within 1 month) with both intravitreal and systemic rituximab plus high-dose methotrexate. Aggressive treatment with intravitreal and systemic antivirals and antibiotics was initiated. However, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of aqueous fluid was negative for cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus, herpes zoster virus and toxoplasma, and her condition continued to worsen, so suspicion was raised for a masquerading recurrent malignancy. She was treated empirically with serial intravitreal injections of methotrexate and showed dramatic clinical improvement. A subsequent relapse occurred that responded rapidly to intravitreal methotrexate in the absence of antiviral/antibiotics.

Conclusion

It is important for clinicians to be aware of atypical presentations of vitreoretinal lymphoma. This case emphasizes the fact that secondary ocular lymphoma after systemic lymphoma can have a vitreoretinal presentation rather than the more common choroidal involvement. Furthermore, it shows that recurrences of this disease in the same patient can have very different manifestations, including an appearance indistinguishable from a viral retinitis.

Role of systemic high-dose methotrexate and combined approaches in the management of vitreoretinal lymphoma: A single center experience 1990-2018

Vitreoretinal lymphoma (VRL) management remains a challenge. We present 72 patients with VRL, diagnosed at Mayo Clinic between 1990-2018. Three nondiffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) histology cases were excluded. Among 69 DLBCL, 33 patients had primary VRL (PVRL), 18 concurrent intraocular and central nervous system (CNS) or systemic disease and 18 secondary VRL. Patients received intraocular chemotherapy (intraocular injections of rituximab or metothrexate or steroids or in combination), radiotherapy, systemic or combined systemic plus intraocular treatment in 9, 10, 35, and 15 cases, respectively. Among primary and concurrent VRL, median failure free survival (FFS), CNS relapse-free survival (CNS-RFS) and overall survival (OS) were: 1.8, 4.9, and 4.1 years, respectively; among PVRL, median FFS, CNS-RFS, and OS were: 2.6 year, Not Reached and 9.3 year, respectively. No CNS relapse occurred beyond 4 years in PVRL. Median OS for patients diagnosed between 1990 and 1999 vs between 2000 and 2018 was 1.5 vs 9.4 years, respectively (P = .0002). OS was significantly higher in PVRL, as compared with concurrent VRL (P = .04). Previous immunosuppression and poor performance status were predictive of worse outcome. In PVRL, a combined systemic and intraocular therapy showed higher FFS (P = .002) and CNS-RFS (P = .003), but no differences in OS. Among 18 secondary VRL, at a median follow-up of 1.1 year after vitreoretinal relapse, median FFS and OS were 0.3 and 1.3 years. An improvement in survival of VRL has been observed over the decades. PVRL should undergo combined systemic and intraocular chemotherapy to prevent CNS progression.

Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma: prevalence, impact, and management challenges

Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) is a rare and potentially fatal intraocular malignancy. More than half of PVRL cases eventually involve the central nervous system (CNS). PVRL frequently masquerades as chronic uveitis. Advanced imaging tests, such as optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence, have been applied in the diagnosis of PVRL. Histology and immunohistochemistry, in combination with molecular tests and IL-10 analysis, have been demonstrated as reliable in diagnosing PVRL. Mortality is high in patients with PVRL associated with CNS involvement, and relapses are common. The use of systemic chemotherapy in addition to the local therapies has proved to extend the mean survival time of these patients. Local therapies, including intravitreal injections of methotrexate and/or rituximab and low-dose radiotherapy to the eye, have been shown to be extremely effective in controlling intraocular lymphoma.

Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma

Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) is a rare ocular lymphoid malignancy, which consists a subset of primary central system lymphoma (PCNSL) and the most common type of intraocular lymphoma. The involvement of eyes is estimated to be approximately 20% of PCNSL, but the brain involvement may be up to 80% of PVRL. Typically, PVRL is a high grade B-cell malignancy of the retina and needs to be assorted from choroidal low-grade B-cell lymphomas. Very often PVRL masquerades and can be erroneously diagnosed as chronic uveitis, white dot syndromes or other neoplasms. Establishing an accurate diagnosis may involve cytology/pathology, immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, molecular pathology and cytokine profile analysis. There is inadequate information about PVRL’s true incidence, ethnic/geographical variation and pathogenetic mechanisms. The therapeutic approach of PVRL involves aggressive chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Although PVRL tends to have a good response to the initial treatment, the prognosis is poor and the survival restricted due to the high relapse rates and CNS involvement.

Survival in B-cell primary ocular lymphoma 1997-2014: a population-based study

This study sought to explore the prognostic factors in a large retrospective cohort of patients with B-cell primary ocular lymphoma (POL) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. There were 2778 patients with B-cell POL whose complete clinical information was listed in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 1997 and 2014. The epidemiology, therapeutic measures, and clinical characteristics were listed as descriptive statistics. Survival analysis was conducted by univariate and multivariable Cox regression models. Multivariate analysis identified age, lymphoma subtype, primary lesion, and radiation status as independent prognostic factors. For indolent lymphoma, radical treatment, especially intravenous chemotherapy, should be avoided. For invasive lymphoma, chemotherapy combined with full orbital irradiation is recommended. Radiotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy is superior to chemotherapy alone. These differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). Radiation brings benefits, with tolerable neurotoxicity, to patients with invasive B-cell POL. Radical tumor treatment may not be needed for patients with indolent B-cell POL.

Challenges and prospects in the diagnosis and treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma

Introduction: Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) retains peculiar biological and clinical characteristics and a worse prognosis with respect to other comparable lymphomas. The need for high doses of chemotherapy to achieve valid drug concentrations in cerebral tissues and/or radiotherapy results in severe treatment-related toxicities, mainly neurologic, which are frequently as disabling as the disease itself.Areas covered: Several emerging combined therapies are addressed that focus on treating PCNSL. The prognosis has improved in the last years but several questions remain unanswered and the research of more effective therapies goes on. Information and data were obtained from direct authors' experience and a PubMed search of recent peer-reviewed original articles, review articles, and clinical guidelines.Expert commentary: The substantial progress observed in PCNSL has to be ascribed to a carefully combination of standard chemotherapeutic drugs. High-dose methotrexate-based polychemotherapy followed by mainteinance therapy offers one of the best chances to control the disease. Major issues that deserve many efforts by researchers are the definition of optimal consolidation treatment and a shared management of specific conditions such as elderly population and intra-ocular localization.

Combined intraocular and systemic rituximab for ocular lymphoproliferative disorder with extranodal marginal zone lymphoma-type morphology after heart transplant

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) has rarely been associated with ocular manifestations. We report a case of bilateral ocular involvement by PTLD with histopathologic features of extranodal marginal zone (MALT) lymphoma in an 8-year-old boy following orthotopic heart transplantation. The anterior segment disease was treated successfully using a combination of intraocular and systemic injections of humanized anti-CD20 antibody (rituximab).

Case 01-2017 - Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL): report of a case and update of literature from 1942 to 2016

Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL), as a subset of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), is a rare and fatal ocular malignancy. Most PVRL masquerades as chronic posterior uveitis, which makes the clinical diagnosis challenging. Vitreous cells, subretinal lesions and imaging techniques are essential for clinical diagnosis. Importantly, cytopathology/histopathology identification of malignant cells is the gold standard for the diagnosis of PVRL. In addition, molecular detection of immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) or T cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangements, immunophenotyping for cell markers, and cytokine analysis of interleukine-10 elevation are often used as adjunct procedures. Current management of PVRL involves local radiation, intravitreal chemotherapy (methotrexate and rituximab), with or without systemic chemotherapy depending on the involvement of non-ocular tissues. In cases with concomitant PCNSL, systemic high-dose methotrexate/rituximab based therapy in conjunction with local therapy, whole brain radiotherapy and/or autologous stem cell transplantation is considered. Although PVRL normally responds well to initial treatment, high rates of relapse and CNS involvement usually lead to poor prognosis and limited survival. A professional team of medical experts in ophthalmologists, ocular pathologists, neuro-oncologists and hemato-oncologists is essential for optimizing patient management.

Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma: an update on pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) is a subset of primary central nervous system lymphoma in which disease primarily affects the uvea, retina, vitreous and optic nerve. This review discusses recent efforts to clarify the disease's pathogenesis, its diagnosis and its optimal treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

PVRL typically masquerades as a chronic intermediate uveitis in older individuals. Unambiguous diagnosis requires cytologic demonstration of malignant cells in a vitreous or chorioretinal specimen. However, cytokine analysis demonstrating increased interleukin 10 (IL 10) levels or increased IL-10:IL-6 ratio in the aqueous or vitreous, flow cytometry demonstrating a monoclonal cell population, molecular analysis demonstrating gene rearrangements or translocations or combinations of several techniques can be used effectively to aid in diagnosis. Treatment is aimed at eradication of disease within the eyes and prevention of central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma. Whether this should be done with local therapy alone (globe irradiation or intravitreal chemotherapy such as methotrexate or rituximab), or with systemic chemotherapy remains a source of debate. Even with high-dose systemic chemotherapy, CNS disease is prone to recurrence and has a poor prognosis.

SUMMARY

New techniques and innovative treatment strategies may streamline time to definitive diagnosis and may lead to prolonged survival with better vision in patients with PVRL.

Nanomedicine in the application of uveal melanoma

Rapid advances in nanomedicine have significantly changed many aspects of nanoparticle application to the eye including areas of diagnosis, imaging and more importantly drug delivery. The nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems has provided a solution to various drug solubility-related problems in ophthalmology treatment. Nanostructured compounds could be used to achieve local ocular delivery with minimal unwanted systematic side effects produced by taking advantage of the phagocyte system. In addition, the in vivo control release by nanomaterials encapsulated drugs provides prolong exposure of the compound in the body. Furthermore, certain nanoparticles can overcome important body barriers including the blood-retinal barrier as well as the corneal-retinal barrier of the eye for effective delivery of the drug. In summary, the nanotechnology based drug delivery system may serve as an important tool for uveal melanoma treatment.

Recent progress in the diagnosis and treatment of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma

Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) was previously termed primary intraocular lymphoma. PVRL is a potentially fatal intraocular malignancy, and 65-90% of PVRL cases eventually involve the central nervous system (CNS). The incidence of PVRL has been rising in both immunocompromised and immuno-competent populations worldwide. PVRL frequently masquerades as chronic uveitis. Advanced auxiliary examinations, such as optical coherence tomography and fundus autofluorescence have been applied in the diagnosis of PVRL. Histology and immunohistochemistry in combination with molecular tests and interleukin-10 analysis have been demonstrated as reliable in diagnosing PVRL. Despite early initiation of treatment, mortality is high with PVRL associated with CNS involvement and relapses are common. The use of systemic chemotherapy has not been proven to prevent CNS involvement; however, local therapies including intravitreal injections of methotrexate and/or rituximab and low-dose radiotherapy to the eye, has shown to be extremely effective in controlling intraocular lymphoma with encouraging results.

How we diagnose and treat vitreoretinal lymphoma

The eye is a rare site for the development of malignant lymphoma. Based on cell type and involved intraocular structures, which as a whole represent an immune-privileged site, several subtypes of primary intraocular lymphoma need to be discerned. Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL), the most common form, is an aggressive B-cell malignancy and considered a subtype of primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma. Ocular symptoms are non-specific and often mimic uveitis, frequently resulting in delayed diagnosis. Bilateral ocular involvement and dissemination/relapse in the CNS are common. Diagnosis of PVRL is usually based on the analysis of vitreous biopsy material. In addition to cytological and immunocytochemical examination, measurements of cytokine levels and molecular determination of B-cell clonality and recurrent mutations increase the diagnostic yield. Both systemic chemotherapy and exclusively local treatment, including ocular radiotherapy and intravitreal chemotherapy, are successful approaches for the management of PVRL, although it is currently not predictable which patients require systemic treatment in order to avoid cerebral dissemination, a complication associated with a considerably worse prognosis.

Primary Vitreoretinal Lymphoma: Management of Isolated Ocular Disease

BACKGROUND

The prognosis for patients with primary vitreoretinal is dismal. The close association of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma with primary central nervous system lymphoma is responsible for high rates of mortality. Traditional treatments consist of systemic chemotherapy and whole-brain radiotherapy. The optimal approach for the treatment of isolated primary vitreoretinal lymphoma is unclear.

METHODS

A review of the relevant medical and scientific literature was performed, focusing on the clinical features of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma and the progress made in the management of isolated ocular disease.

RESULTS

Ocular treatment options for primary vitreoretinal lymphoma have recently expanded with the addition of intravitreal chemotherapeutic agents and localized radiation. Based on several retrospective reports, a general shift has been made toward local therapy (eg, orbital radiotherapy, intravitreal chemotherapy) for ocular disease. No prospective, randomized clinical trials yet exist to guide therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal treatment regimens for isolated primary vitreoretinal lymphoma continue to evolve. Further investigations into novel therapies and protocols are needed to decrease recurrence rates, reduce or prevent central nervous system involvement, and improve rates of overall survival.

[Diagnostics and treatment of primary vitreoretinal lymphoma]

BACKGROUND

Primary vitreoretinal lymphoma (PVRL) is a rare ocular lymphoid malignancy, mostly a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The PVRL, previously called primary intraocular lymphoma (PIOL), is a subset of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).

DIAGNOSIS

The diagnosis of PVRL is often difficult as it often mimics chronic intermediate or posterior uveitis; therefore, PVRL requires various procedures for the diagnostics, e.g. immunohistochemistry, cytology, pathology, molecular pathology and cytokine analysis (interleukin 10) after surgically obtaining ocular specimens.

THERAPY

Treatment forms that are effective for systemic lymphomas have not been reliably successful for PVRL and PCNSL. Current management of PVRL consists of chemotherapy, such as methotrexate or rituximab, possibly combined with external beam radiation whereby both chemotherapeutic agents are administered systemically as well as intravitreally. Intravitreal treatment alone is recommended solely in the case of monocular PVRL, which is highly controversial. A PVRL usually responds well to initial treatment; however, relapse rates and CNS involvement are high, resulting in a poor prognosis and limited survival.

Intensive chemoimmunotherapy and bilateral globe irradiation as initial therapy for primary intraocular lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Primary intraocular lymphoma is a rare variant of primary CNS lymphoma for which the optimum treatment strategy remains unknown.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-center study including patients who underwent uniform management from October 2007 in which patients were offered sequential rituximab, methotrexate, procarbazine, and vincristine (R-MPV) followed by binocular radiotherapy and consolidative high-dose cytarabine.

RESULTS

Eleven patients with median age 66 years (range, 48-72) were included. All patients received binocular radiotherapy to a median dose of 36 Gy (range, 30.6-39.6) in 20 fractions. Grade 3+ anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia occurred in 1 (9%), 2 (18%), and 3 (27%) patients, respectively; raised creatinine and peripheral sensory neuropathy occurred in 4 (36%) and 3 (27%) patients, respectively. Grade 3+ ocular toxicities included cataract formation and keratitis in 6 (54%) and 3 (27%) patients, respectively. Ten patients (91%) achieved complete response and 1 (9%) partial response. After median follow-up of 4.2 years (range, 1.8-7.6), the median progression-free survival was 3.8 years and the estimated 4-year overall survival was 75.8% (95% CI: 30.5%-93.7%). The initial site of disease progression was the CNS in 4 of 7 patients (57%) and within the eye in 3 of 7 (43%). Five patients achieved responses to salvage therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined modality treatment with R-MPV, binocular radiation, and high-dose cytarabine is effective with moderate toxicity. Both local and CNS relapses occur; however, the achievement of second and subsequent remissions is possible.