1
|
Bramstedt KA. Human Whole-Eye Donation for Research-Optimizing Clinical Trial Informed Consent. JAMA Ophthalmol 2024; 142:476-479. [PMID: 38512234 DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.0203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
Importance Posthumous whole-eye (globe) donations for research lack a mechanism that reinvolves the existing ophthalmic research team of the donor unless there is a preplanned donor directive. Disconnection between the deceased and their research team equates to lost opportunities for the research team to have a longitudinal view of the eyes that have been involved in their research. Objectives To use the clinical trial informed consent process to create a posthumous research donation opportunity that directs the donation to the currently affiliated research team of the donors (preserving the longitudinal research experience). Evidence Reviewed Current globe donation pathways were reviewed. Additionally, published advice from the fields of ophthalmology, brain banking, and implantable medical devices were used as reference points. Findings Globe donation represents a small but valuable type of ocular donation. Globe donation for research purposes is useful for investigators performing total human eye allotransplantation clinical trials, as well as for ophthalmic drug or device researchers. Results suggest that those performing invasive eye research should include the option of posthumous globe donation in their study protocols and informed consent forms to facilitate more opportunities for the generation of scientific knowledge. Conclusions and Relevance The longitudinal perspective can be valuable especially for eyes that have received long-term treatment with an investigational drug or device. This article poses a research-informed consent framework for posthumous globe donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrina A Bramstedt
- Global Head of Bioethics, Bioethics Department, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland
- Bond University Medical Program, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Machin H, Sutton G, Baird PN. Examining Corneal Tissue Exportation Fee and Its Impact on Equitable Allocation. Cornea 2022; 41:390-395. [PMID: 34483277 DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000002856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
METHODS We conducted grounded theory semistructured interviews, purposively inviting participants until themed saturation was met. Sentiment analysis was used to determine opinion. RESULTS We interviewed n = 92 global eye tissue and eye bank professionals. We determined that corneal tissue, which is exported, costs between US $100 and US $6000 or is provided as gratis. Collectively, interviewees indicated that, globally, there were no fixed fee structures in place, and the fee was influenced by multiple factors on both export and import sides. They indicated that ultimately corneas were allocated based on the importers' ability to pay the price determined by the exporting eye bank. DISCUSSION Allocation of corneal tissue, which is exported, is influenced by the fees charged by the exporters to meet their bottom line and the funds available to importers. Therefore, export allocation is not equitable, with those who can pay a higher fee, prioritized. Steps to guide and support exporters with the development of fee structures that promote equitable allocation are essential. This will assist both export and import eye bank development, corneal tissue access development, and those awaiting a corneal transplant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Machin
- Lions Eye Donation Service, Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gerard Sutton
- The University of Sydney, Save Sight Institute, Discipline of Ophthalmology, Sydney Medical School, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and
- The University of Technology Sydney, Graduate School of Health, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Paul N Baird
- Department of Surgery, Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Machin H, Buckland L, Georges P, Ghabcha M, Golding-Holbrook T, Leighton C, Mackey A, Weinel L, Whiting V, Sutton G, Baird PN. Supply and Demand of Domestic Corneal Tissue and Its Implications on Export Potential-Using Australia as an Example. Cornea 2021; 40:1229-1235. [PMID: 33290321 DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000002599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Corneal tissue importation is only possible if another country is able to export corneas without impacting its own domestic demand. Currently, there is little evidence to indicate whether export nations have such surplus capacity and in a position to export. To explore this concept, we examined our nation, Australia, which is reported to routinely decline donations because of its ability to meet domestic corneal transplant demand. Our research offers insights and opportunities for Australia and other nations to evaluate their domestic and international supply and allocation of corneal tissue in this space. METHOD We collated 12 months of data on collected and noncollected donations, through participating Australian Eye Banks. The explanation of why some known donors were declined or not pursued indicated if demand was met and potential surplus-for-export levels. RESULTS There were 7.5% (n = 11,889) of deaths in Australia that were notified to Australian Eye Banks during our reporting period. Of those, 9.3% (n = 1106/11,889) were recovered and allocated, 15.7% (n = 1863/11,889) were known but declined, and 75% (n = 8920/11,889) were not pursued. Of those that were declined, 64.3% (n = 1197/1863) were declined because of limitations with service/manpower at the eye bank, whereas 35.7% (n = 666/1863) were declined because demand was met. CONCLUSIONS Australia did not meet demand all the time, during our data period. There were adequate quantities of potential donors to support increasing recovery for domestic allocation and provide for exportation without hindrance to Australian demand. Further examination of domestic supply and demand cycles and the export process is required before routine exportation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Machin
- Lions Eye Donation Service, Center for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, East Melbourne, Australia
| | - Lisa Buckland
- Lions Eye Bank of Western Australia, Lions Eye Institute, Perth, Australia
| | - Pierre Georges
- New South Wales Tissue Banks, New South Wales Organ and Tissue Donation Service, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mona Ghabcha
- New South Wales Tissue Banks, New South Wales Organ and Tissue Donation Service, Sydney, Australia
| | - Tamme Golding-Holbrook
- Eye Bank of South Australia, Department of Ophthalmology, Surgical and Perioperative Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Candice Leighton
- Queensland Eye Bank, Queensland Tissue Bank, Organ and Tissue Donation Service, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Adrienne Mackey
- Lions Eye Donation Service, Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Surgery|Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Luke Weinel
- Eye Bank of South Australia, Department of Ophthalmology, Surgical and Perioperative Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Victoria Whiting
- Queensland Eye Bank, Queensland Tissue Bank, Organ and Tissue Donation Service, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Gerard Sutton
- New South Wales Tissue Banks, New South Wales Organ and Tissue Donation Service, Sydney, Australia
- Discipline of Ophthalmology, Sydney Medical School, Save Sight Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; and
- Graduate School of Health, The University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Paul N Baird
- Department of Surgery|Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baird PN, Machin H, Brown KD. Corneal supply and the use of technology to reduce its demand: A review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2021; 49:1078-1090. [PMID: 34310836 DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Recovery and access to end-of-life corneal tissue for corneal transplantation, training and research is globally maldistributed. The reasons for the maldistribution are complex and multifaceted, and not well defined or understood. Currently there are few solutions available to effectively address these issues. This review provides an overview of the system, key issues impacting recovery and allocation and emphasises how end-user ophthalmologists and researchers, with support from administrators and the wider sector, can assist in increasing access long-term through sustaining eye banks nationally and globally. We posit that prevention measures and improved surgical techniques, together with the development of novel therapies will play a significant role in reducing demand and enhance the equitable allocation of corneas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul N Baird
- Department of Surgery, Ophthalmology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Heather Machin
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Lions Eye Donation Service, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Karl D Brown
- Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|