Supply and Demand of Domestic Corneal Tissue and Its Implications on Export Potential-Using Australia as an Example

PURPOSE

Corneal tissue importation is only possible if another country is able to export corneas without impacting its own domestic demand. Currently, there is little evidence to indicate whether export nations have such surplus capacity and in a position to export. To explore this concept, we examined our nation, Australia, which is reported to routinely decline donations because of its ability to meet domestic corneal transplant demand. Our research offers insights and opportunities for Australia and other nations to evaluate their domestic and international supply and allocation of corneal tissue in this space.

METHOD

We collated 12 months of data on collected and noncollected donations, through participating Australian Eye Banks. The explanation of why some known donors were declined or not pursued indicated if demand was met and potential surplus-for-export levels.

RESULTS

There were 7.5% (n = 11,889) of deaths in Australia that were notified to Australian Eye Banks during our reporting period. Of those, 9.3% (n = 1106/11,889) were recovered and allocated, 15.7% (n = 1863/11,889) were known but declined, and 75% (n = 8920/11,889) were not pursued. Of those that were declined, 64.3% (n = 1197/1863) were declined because of limitations with service/manpower at the eye bank, whereas 35.7% (n = 666/1863) were declined because demand was met.

CONCLUSIONS

Australia did not meet demand all the time, during our data period. There were adequate quantities of potential donors to support increasing recovery for domestic allocation and provide for exportation without hindrance to Australian demand. Further examination of domestic supply and demand cycles and the export process is required before routine exportation.

Are point-of-care urine albumin-creatinine ratio measurements accurate in the critically ill?

BACKGROUND

In the critical care environment, elevated albuminuria values show capacity to reflect illness severity and predict mortality and hence assessing albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) at the bedside has potential clinical benefit Point-of-care (POC) analysers offer rapid results but may be less accurate then laboratory analysis.

METHODS

Critically ill adult patients with a urinary catheter in situ had albumin, creatinine, and ACR measurements performed via laboratory and POC analysis. Data are presented as mean (standard deviation) or median [interquartile range]. Measurement agreement was assessed by Lin's concordance correlation coefficient, Bland Altman 95% limits of agreement, and classification by Cohen's kappa statistic.

RESULTS/FINDINGS

Albumin, creatinine, and ACR analysis was performed for 30 patients. Lin's correlation coefficient showed 'substantial' agreement for albumin and ACR and 'almost perfect' agreement for creatinine for POC vs laboratory analysis. POC vs laboratory analysis also showed poor agreement for identification of normal ACR (>1 mg/mmol) and mild urine ACR (1-3 mg/mmol) and 'substantial' agreement for moderately increased urine ACR (3-30 mg/mmol).

CONCLUSIONS

ACR POC values appear to provide an accurate and rapid method that has potential to provide an early indication of injury severity and mortality risk in the critically ill.

Clinical Sequelae From Overfeeding in Enterally Fed Critically Ill Adults: Where Is the Evidence?

Enteral energy delivery above requirements (overfeeding) is believed to cause adverse effects during critical illness, but the literature supporting this is limited. We aimed to quantify the reported frequency and clinical sequelae of energy overfeeding with enterally delivered nutrition in critically ill adult patients. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL from conception to November 28, 2018, identified clinical studies of nutrition interventions in enterally fed critically ill adults that reported overfeeding in 1 or more study arms. Overfeeding was defined as energy delivery > 2000 kcal/d, > 25 kcal/kg/d, or ≥ 110% of energy prescription. Data were extracted on methodology, demographics, prescribed and delivered nutrition, clinical variables, and predefined outcomes. Cochrane "Risk of Bias" tool was used to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Eighteen studies were included, of which 10 were randomized (n = 4386 patients) and 8 were nonrandomized (n = 223). Only 4 studies reported a separation in energy delivery between treatment groups whereby 1 arm met the definition of overfeeding, which reported no between-group differences in mortality, infectious complications, or ventilatory support. Overfeeding was associated with increased insulin administration (median 3 [interquartile range: 0-41.8] vs 0 [0-30.6] units/d) and upper-gastrointestinal intolerance in 1 large RCT and with duration of antimicrobial therapy in a small RCT. There are limited high-quality data to determine the impact of energy overfeeding of critically ill patients by the enteral route; however, based on available evidence, overfeeding does not appear to affect mortality or other important clinical outcomes.