1
|
Portengen B, Imhof S, Naber M, Porro G. Diagnostic performance of pupil perimetry in detecting hemianopia under standard and virtual reality viewing conditions. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2024:10.1007/s00417-024-06641-4. [PMID: 39289308 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-024-06641-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the diagnostic performance and reliability of two pupil perimetry (PP) methods in homonymous hemianopia. METHODS This cross-sectional monocenter cohort study performed gaze-contingent flicker PP (gcFPP) and a virtual reality version of gcFPP (VRgcFPP) twice on separate occasions in all patients suffering from homonymous hemianopia due to neurological impairment. The main outcomes were (1) test accuracy and (2) test-retest reliability: (1) was measured through area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) calculation of (VR)gcFPP results with comparators being SAP and healthy controls, respectively; (2) was evaluated by comparing tests 1 and 2 of both methods within patients. RESULTS Both gcFPP and VRgcFPP were performed in 15 patients (12 males, MAge = 57, SDAge = 15) and 17 controls (6 males, MAge = 53, SDAge = 12). Mean test accuracy was good in separating damaged from intact visual field regions (gcFPP: Mauc = 0.83, SDauc = 0.09; VRgcFPP: Mauc = 0.69, SDauc = 0.13) and in separating patients from controls (gcFPP: Mauc = 0.92, SDauc = 0.13; VRgcFPP: Mauc = 0.96, SDauc = 0.15). A high test-retest reliability was found for the proportion intact versus damaged visual field (gcFPP: r = 0.95, P < .001, VRgcFPP: r = 1.00, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Overall, these results can be summarized as follows: (1) the comparison of pupil response amplitudes between intact versus damaged regions per patient indicate that gcFPP allows for cleaner imaging of intact versus damaged visual field regions than VRgcFPP, (2) the comparisons of average differences in intact versus damaged amplitudes between patients and controls demonstrate high diagnostic performance of both gcFPP and VRgcFPP, and (3) the test-retest reliabilities confirm that both gcFPP and VRgcFPP reliably and consistently measure defects in homonymous hemianopia. KEY MESSAGES: What is known Standard automated perimetry is the current gold standard for visual field examination, but not always suited for the evaluation of the VF in neurologically impaired patients. Pupil perimetry consists of the measurement of pupillary responses to light stimuli as a measure of visual sensitivity. What is new This study reports the highest diagnostic accuracy of pupil perimetry so far in patients with homonymous hemianopia. Gaze-contingent flicker pupil perimetry reliably and consistently measures defects in homonymous hemianopia under standard and virtual reality viewing conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan Portengen
- Ophthalmology Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room E 03.136, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Saskia Imhof
- Ophthalmology Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room E 03.136, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix Naber
- Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Giorgio Porro
- Ophthalmology Department, University Medical Center Utrecht, Room E 03.136, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Philibert M, Milea D. Basics, benefits, and pitfalls of pupillometers assessing visual function. Eye (Lond) 2024; 38:2415-2421. [PMID: 38802485 PMCID: PMC11306737 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03151-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Numerous commercially and non-commercially available pupillometers are nowadays able to assess various biological functions in humans, by evaluating pupils' dynamics in response to specific stimuli. However, the use of pupillometers for ophthalmic afferent evaluations (i.e., photoreceptoral responses) in real-world settings is relatively limited. Recent scientific and technological advances, coupled with artificial intelligence methods have improved the performance of such devices to objectively detect, quantify, and classify functional disturbances of the retina and the optic nerve. This review aims to summarize the scientific principles, indications, outcomes, and current limitations of pupillometry used for evaluation of afferent pathways in ophthalmic clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dan Milea
- Rothschild Foundation Hospital, Paris, France.
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
- Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
- Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jendritza R, Stingl K, Strasser T, Jung R, Tonagel F, Richter P, Sonntag A, Peters T, Wilhelm H, Wilhelm B, Kelbsch C. Influencing Factors on Pupillary Light Responses as a Biomarker for Local Retinal Function in a Large Normative Cohort. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2024; 65:3. [PMID: 38829669 PMCID: PMC11156203 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.6.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Investigating influencing factors on the pupillary light response (PLR) as a biomarker for local retinal function by providing epidemiological data of a large normative collective and to establish a normative database for the evaluation of chromatic pupil campimetry (CPC). Methods Demographic and ophthalmologic characteristics were captured and PLR parameters of 150 healthy participants (94 women) aged 18 to 79 years (median = 46 years) were measured with L-cone- and rod-favoring CPC protocols. Linear-mixed effects models were performed to determine factors influencing the PLR and optical coherence tomography (OCT) data were correlated with the pupillary function volume. Results Relative maximal constriction amplitude (relMCA) and latency under L-cone- and rod-favoring stimulation were statistically significantly affected by the stimulus eccentricity (P < 0.0001, respectively). Iris color and gender did not affect relMCA or latency significantly; visual hemifield, season, and daytime showed only minor influence under few stimulus conditions. Age had a statistically significant effect on latency under rod-specific stimulation with a latency prolongation ≥60 years. Under photopic and scotopic conditions, baseline pupil diameter declined significantly with increasing age (P < 0.0001, respectively). Pupillary function volume and OCT data were not correlated relevantly. Conclusions Stimulus eccentricity had the most relevant impact on relMCA and latency of the PLR during L-cone- and rod-favoring stimulation. Latency is prolonged ≥60 years under scotopic conditions. Considering the large study collective, a representative normative database for relMCA and latency as valid readout parameters for L-cone- and rod-favoring stimulation could be established. This further validates the usability of the PLR in CPC as a biomarker for local retinal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricarda Jendritza
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Krunoslav Stingl
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Center for Rare Eye Diseases, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Torsten Strasser
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ronja Jung
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Felix Tonagel
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Paul Richter
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Anton Sonntag
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Tobias Peters
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Helmut Wilhelm
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Barbara Wilhelm
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Carina Kelbsch
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kelbsch C, Kempf M, Jung R, Kortüm F, Reith M, Kuehlewein L, Kohl S, Strasser T, Peters T, Wilhelm H, Wilhelm B, Stingl K, Stingl K. Rod and Cone Function Measured Objectively by Chromatic Pupil Campimetry Show a Different Preservation Between Distinct Genotypes in Retinitis Pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2023; 64:18. [PMID: 37578425 PMCID: PMC10431211 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.11.18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Verifying whether specific genotypes causing retinitis pigmentosa (RP) show differences in the preservation of rod and cone function measured by chromatic pupil campimetry (CPC). Methods Sixty-three RP eyes (37 male, 14-58 years) were measured using CPC with specific photopic and scotopic protocols, and the relative maximal constriction amplitudes and latencies to constriction onset were analyzed per genotype (RP due to variants in EYS, n = 14; PDE6A, n = 10; RPE65, n = 15; USH2A, n = 10; and RPGR, n = 14). Correlation analyses between the pupillary responses were performed with age, full-field stimulus threshold (FST), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for cones and rods, respectively, to the genotype. Results Pupillary responses were most severely reduced in RPE65-RP. Patients with disease-associated variants in EYS and USH2A were accompanied with better-preserved rod function compared with the other subgroups, reaching statistical significance between EYS and RPE65. Cone function was statistically significantly correlated with age in USH2A-RP with an annual decline of 2.4%. Correlations of pupillary responses were found with FST but barely with the ellipsoid zone area in OCT. Latency was significantly more prolonged in RPE65-RP compared with the other genotypes for cones. Conclusions Rod and cone function measured objectively by CPC showed a different preservation between genotypes in RP. However, heterogeneity inside the same genotype was present. CPC data correlated with FST, but structural OCT parameters seem to be limited indicators for photoreceptor function in RP. Prolonged time dynamics for cones in RPE65 mutations suggest an impact on cone processing and might provide additional information in the evaluation of therapy effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina Kelbsch
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Melanie Kempf
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Center for Rare Eye Diseases, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ronja Jung
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Friederike Kortüm
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Milda Reith
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Laura Kuehlewein
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Susanne Kohl
- Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Torsten Strasser
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Tobias Peters
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Helmut Wilhelm
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Barbara Wilhelm
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Krunoslav Stingl
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Center for Rare Eye Diseases, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Katarina Stingl
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Center for Rare Eye Diseases, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Central retina plays a decisive role in the suppression of pupillary escape. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2023; 261:1713-1722. [PMID: 36645454 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05959-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the pupil redilation during persistent light exposure (pupillary escape phenomenon) at the macula and periphery with monochromatic light stimuli. METHODS Forty healthy subjects aged 18-64 years (24 females) were examined by chromatic pupil campimetry (CPC) using red and blue 4-s stimuli of 10° radius at the center and 20°-peripheral locations one per quadrant. One glaucoma patient and one achromatopsia patient served as disease models. For statistical analyses, linear mixed-effects models were performed followed by post hoc t-tests. RESULTS A distinct pupillary escape could be demonstrated peripherally (blue 0.099%*s, red 0.153%*s); at the central healthy retina, there was no relevant escape, neither for blue nor red stimulation. Comparing central versus peripheral stimulation revealed highly significant differences in the escape (difference blue 0.100 ± 0.013, red 0.144 ± 0.013, < 0.0001, respectively). In the periphery, the escape was significantly more pronounced for red compared with blue stimulation (difference 0.054 ± 0.013; p = 0.0001). Enhanced pupillary escape outside of the 95% confidence interval of the linear mixed-effects model of the healthy population could be exemplarily shown in a patient with glaucomatous ganglion cell damage. In the achromatopsia example, no relevant escape was found for blue stimulation, but for red stimulation in the periphery in a comparable range to healthy controls. CONCLUSION The results emphasize that an intact inner retinal network of nerve fibers arising from the central macular region is necessary for maintaining pupillary constriction during a bright 4-s light stimulus and preventing increase of pupillary escape. Increasing receptive field sizes towards the periphery on the level of retinal ganglion cells and less input from central 1:1 connections could be one of the driving mechanisms for pupillary escape.
Collapse
|
6
|
Portengen BL, Porro GL, Imhof SM, Naber M. The Trade-Off Between Luminance and Color Contrast Assessed With Pupil Responses. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2023; 12:15. [PMID: 36622687 PMCID: PMC9838585 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.12.1.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose A scene consisting of a white stimulus on a black background incorporates strong luminance contrast. When both stimulus and background receive different colors, luminance contrast decreases but color contrast increases. Here, we sought to characterize the pattern of stimulus salience across varying trade-offs of color and luminance contrasts by using the pupil light response. Methods Three experiments were conducted with 17, 16, and 17 healthy adults. For all experiments, a flickering stimulus (2 Hz; alternating color to black) was presented superimposed on a background with a complementary color to the stimulus (i.e., opponency colors in human color perception: blue and yellow for Experiment 1, red and green for Experiment 2, and equiluminant red and green for Experiment 3). Background luminance varied between 0% and 45% to trade off luminance and color contrast with the stimulus. By comparing the locus of the optimal trade-off between color and luminance across different color axes, we explored the generality of the trade-off. Results The strongest pupil responses were found when a substantial amount of color contrast was present (at the expense of luminance contrast). Pupil response amplitudes increased by 15% to 30% after the addition of color contrast. An optimal pupillary responsiveness was reached at a background luminance setting of 20% to 35% color contrast across several color axes. Conclusions These findings suggest that a substantial component of pupil light responses incorporates color processing. More sensitive pupil responses and more salient stimulus designs can be achieved by adding subtle levels of color contrast between stimulus and background. Translational Relevance More robust pupil responses will enhance tests of the visual field with pupil perimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brendan L. Portengen
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Giorgio L. Porro
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia M. Imhof
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix Naber
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Stingl K, Hoyng C, Kempf M, Kohl S, Jung R, Righetti G, Kühlewein L, Pohl L, Kortüm F, Kelbsch C, Wilhelm B, Peters T, Stingl K. Evaluation of Local Rod and Cone Function in Stargardt Disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2022; 63:6. [PMID: 35262734 PMCID: PMC8934563 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.63.3.6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose In this study, chromatic pupil campimetry (CPC) was used to map local functional degenerative changes of cones and rods in Stargardt disease (STGD1). Methods 19 patients (age 36 ± 8 years; 12 males) with genetically confirmed ABCA4 mutations and a clinical diagnosis of STGD1 and 12 age-matched controls (age 37 ± 11 years; 2 males) underwent scotopic (rod-favoring) and photopic (cone-favoring) CPC. CPC evaluates the local retinal function in the central 30° visual field via analysis of the pupil constriction to local stimuli in a gaze-corrected manner. Results Scotopic CPC revealed that the rod function of patients with STGD1 inside the 30° visual field was not impaired when compared with age-matched controls. However, a statistically significant faster pupil response onset time (∼ 40 ms) was observed in the measured area. Photopic CPC showed a significant reduction of the central cone function up to 6°, with a minor, non-significant reduction beyond this eccentricity. The time dynamic of the pupillary response in photopic CPC did not reveal differences between STGD1 and controls. Conclusions The functional analysis of the macular region in STGD1 disease indicates reduced central cone function, corresponding to photoreceptor degeneration. In contrast, the rod function in the central area was not affected. Nevertheless, some alteration of the time dynamics in the rod system was observed indicating a complex effect of cone degeneration on the functional performance of the rod system. Our results should be considered when interpreting safety and efficacy in interventional trials of STGD1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krunoslav Stingl
- University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Center for Rare Eye Diseases, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Carel Hoyng
- Department of Ophthalmology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Melanie Kempf
- University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Center for Rare Eye Diseases, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Susanne Kohl
- Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ronja Jung
- University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Giulia Righetti
- University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Laura Kühlewein
- University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Lisa Pohl
- University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Friederike Kortüm
- University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Carina Kelbsch
- University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Pupil research group, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Barbara Wilhelm
- Pupil research group, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,STZ eyetrial at the Center for Ophthalmology, University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Tobias Peters
- Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Pupil research group, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,STZ eyetrial at the Center for Ophthalmology, University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Katarina Stingl
- University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.,Center for Rare Eye Diseases, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kelbsch C, Stingl K, Jung R, Kempf M, Richter P, Strasser T, Peters T, Wilhelm B, Wilhelm H, Tonagel F. How lesions at different locations along the visual pathway influence pupillary reactions to chromatic stimuli. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2021; 260:1675-1685. [PMID: 34902059 PMCID: PMC9007757 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05513-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine systematically how prechiasmal, chiasmal, and postchiasmal lesions along the visual pathway affect the respective pupillary responses to specific local monochromatic stimuli. METHODS Chromatic pupil campimetry (CPC) was performed in three patient groups (10 subjects with status after anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, 6 with chiasmal lesions, and 12 with optic tract or occipital lobe lesions (tumor, ischemia)) using red, low-intensity red, and blue local stimuli within the central 30° visual field. Affected areas - as determined by visual field defects revealed using conventional static perimetry - were compared with non-affected areas. Outcome parameters were the relative maximal constriction amplitude (relMCA) and the latency to constriction onset of the pupillary responses. RESULTS A statistically significant relMCA reduction was observed in the affected areas of postchiasmal lesions with red (p = 0.004) and low-intensity red stimulation (p = 0.001). RelMCA reduction in the affected areas seemed more pronounced for low-intensity red stimulation (46.5% mean reduction compared to non-affected areas; 36% for red stimulation), however statistically not significant. In prechiasmal lesions, a statistically significant latency prolongation could be demonstrated in the affected areas with low-intensity red stimulation (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION Our results indicate that the choice of stimulus characteristics is relevant in detecting defects in the pupillary pathway of impairment along the visual pathway, favoring red stimuli of low intensity over blue stimuli. Such knowledge opens the door for further fundamental research in pupillary pathways and is important for future clinical application of pupillography in neuro-ophthalmologic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina Kelbsch
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Krunoslav Stingl
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
- Center for Rare Eye Diseases, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
| | - Ronja Jung
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Melanie Kempf
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Center for Rare Eye Diseases, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Paul Richter
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Torsten Strasser
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Tobias Peters
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Barbara Wilhelm
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Helmut Wilhelm
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
- Pupil Research Group at the Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Felix Tonagel
- University Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Effect of central and peripheral cone- and rod-specific stimulation on the pupillary light reflex. Int Ophthalmol 2021; 42:1427-1436. [PMID: 34826023 PMCID: PMC9123028 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-021-02132-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To assess the effect of central and peripheral stimulation on the pupillary light reflex. The aim was to detect possible differences between cone- and rod-driven reactions. Methods Relative maximal pupil constriction amplitude (relMCA) and latency to constriction onset (latency) to cone- and rod-specific stimuli of 30 healthy participants (24 ± 5 years (standard deviation)) were measured using chromatic pupil campimetry. Cone- and rod-specific stimuli had different intensities and wavelengths according to the Standards in Pupillography. Five filled circles with radii of 3°, 5°, 10°, 20° and 40° and four rings with a constant outer radius of 40° and inner radii of 3°, 5°, 10° and 20° were used as stimuli. Results For cone-and rod-specific stimuli, relMCA increased with the stimulus area for both, circles and rings. However, increasing the area of a cone-specific ring by minimizing its inner radius with constant outer radius increased relMCA significantly stronger than the same did for a rod-specific ring. For cones and rods, a circle stimulus with a radius of 40° created a lower relMCA than the summation of the relMCAs to the corresponding ring and circle stimuli which combined create a 40° circle-stimulus. Latency was longer for rods than for cones. It decreased with increasing stimulus area for circle stimuli while it stayed nearly constant with increasing ring stimulus area for cone- and rod-specific stimuli. Conclusion The effect of central stimulation on relMCA is more dominant for cone-specific stimuli than for rod-specific stimuli while latency dynamics are similar for both conditions. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10792-021-02132-1.
Collapse
|
10
|
Stingl K, Kempf M, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Dimopoulos S, Reichel F, Jung R, Kelbsch C, Kohl S, Kortüm FC, Nasser F, Peters T, Wilhelm B, Wissinger B, Wozar F, Zrenner E, Fischer MD, Stingl K. Spatial and temporal resolution of the photoreceptors rescue dynamics after treatment with voretigene neparvovec. Br J Ophthalmol 2021; 106:831-838. [PMID: 33472769 PMCID: PMC9132865 DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Background Voretigene neparvovec is a gene therapeutic agent for treatment of retinal dystrophies caused by bi-allelic RPE65 mutations. In this study, we report on a novel and objective evaluation of a retinotopic photoreceptor rescue. Methods Seven eyes of five patients (14, 21, 23, 24, 36 years, 1 male, 4 females) with bi-allelic RPE65 mutations have been treated with voretigene neparvovec. The clinical examinations included visual acuity testing, dark-adapted full-field stimulus threshold (FST), dark-adapted chromatic perimeter (DAC) with a 30-degree grid, and a 30 degrees grid scotopic and photopic chromatic pupil campimetry (CPC). All evaluations and spectral domain optical coherence tomography were performed at baseline, 1 month and 3 months. Results All except the oldest patient had a measurable improvement of the rod function assessed via FST, DAC or scotopic CPC at 1 month. The visual acuity improved slightly or remained stable in all eyes. A cone function improvement as measured by photopic CPC was observed in three eyes. The gain of the dark-adapted threshold with blue FST and the DAC stimuli (cyan) average correlated strongly with age (R2>0.7). The pupil response improvement in the scotopic CPC correlated with the baseline local retinal volume (R2=0.5). Conclusions The presented protocols allow evaluating the individual spatial and temporal effects of gene therapy effects. Additionally, we explored parameters that correlated with the success of the therapy. CPC and DAC present new and fast ways to assess functional changes in retinotopic maps of rod and cone function, measuring complementary aspects of retinal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krunoslav Stingl
- University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Center for Rare Eye Diseases, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Pupil Research Group at the University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Melanie Kempf
- University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Center for Rare Eye Diseases, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Karl U Bartz-Schmidt
- University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Spyridon Dimopoulos
- University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Felix Reichel
- University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Ronja Jung
- University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Carina Kelbsch
- University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Pupil Research Group at the University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Susanne Kohl
- Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Friederike Charlotte Kortüm
- University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Fadi Nasser
- Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Peters
- Pupil Research Group at the University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- STZ eyetrial at the Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Barbara Wilhelm
- Pupil Research Group at the University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- STZ eyetrial at the Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Bernd Wissinger
- Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Wozar
- University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Eberhart Zrenner
- Center for Rare Eye Diseases, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Werner Reichardt Centre for Integrative Neuroscience (CIN), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - M Dominik Fischer
- University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
- Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Katarina Stingl
- University Eye Hospital, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
- Center for Rare Eye Diseases, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|