Loss of diacylglycerol kinase ε causes thrombotic microangiopathy by impairing endothelial VEGFA signaling

Clinical features and management of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome patient with DGKE gene variants: a case report

Background

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) with diacylglycerol kinase epsilon (DGKE) gene variant is a rare variant of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA). The information on the clinical features, management and long-term outcomes of DGKE-aHUS patients have not yet been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to report a novel variant of the DGKE gene in a Chinese population with aHUS.

Case presentation

The present work reports a 7-month-old boy with aHUS, possibly triggered by gastrointestinal infection, without complement activation, with little response to plasma therapy and nephroprotective measures. The patient died during the 8th week of his hospital stay. The causes of death were intracranial hemorrhage and multiorgan dysfunction. Comprehensive WES of peripheral blood-derived DNA revealed two heterozygous variations in the DGKE exon region: NM_003647.2, c.610dup, p.Thr204Asnfs*4 and deletion of exons 4-6.

Conclusions

This case suggest that atypical HUS with DGKE gene variant has a poor prognosis with a high mortality rate, which typically manifests in the first year of life and presents as a systemic disease with early-onset HUS with rapidly worsening renal function and chronic proteinuria. There is no specific treatment for DGKE-aHUS. There have an uncertain benefit of plasma therapy for DGKE-aHUS patients. The literature demonstrated that anti-complement therapy showed benefits for DGKE-aHUS with complement activation and autoantibodies during the overt TMA presentation but did not prevent TMA relapses. Early diagnosis and treatment may prevent complications and improve prognosis.

Dysregulation of Immune Cell Subpopulations in Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare, life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy. Definitive biomarkers for disease diagnosis and activity remain elusive, making the exploration of molecular markers paramount. We conducted single-cell sequencing on peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 13 aHUS patients, 3 unaffected family members of aHUS patients, and 4 healthy controls. We identified 32 distinct subpopulations encompassing 5 B-cell types, 16 T- and natural killer (NK) cell types, 7 monocyte types, and 4 other cell types. Notably, we observed a significant increase in intermediate monocytes in unstable aHUS patients. Subclustering analysis revealed seven elevated expression genes, including NEAT1, MT-ATP6, MT-CYB, VIM, ACTG1, RPL13, and KLRB1, in unstable aHUS patients, and four heightened expression genes, including RPS27, RPS4X, RPL23, and GZMH genes, in stable aHUS patients. Additionally, an increase in the expression of mitochondria-related genes suggested a potential influence of cell metabolism on the clinical progression of the disease. Pseudotime trajectory analysis revealed a unique immune cell differentiation pattern, while cell-cell interaction profiling highlighted distinctive signaling pathways among patients, family members, and controls. This single-cell sequencing study is the first to confirm immune cell dysregulation in aHUS pathogenesis, offering valuable insights into molecular mechanisms and potential new diagnostic and disease activity markers.

Haemolytic uraemic syndrome

Haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) is a heterogeneous group of diseases that result in a common pathology, thrombotic microangiopathy, which is classically characterised by the triad of non-immune microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury. In this Seminar, different causes of HUS are discussed, the most common being Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli HUS. Identifying the underlying thrombotic microangiopathy trigger can be challenging but is imperative if patients are to receive personalised disease-specific treatment. The quintessential example is complement-mediated HUS, which once carried an extremely high mortality but is now treated with anti-complement therapies with excellent long-term outcomes. Unfortunately, the high cost of anti-complement therapies all but precludes their use in low-income countries. For many other forms of HUS, targeted therapies are yet to be identified.

An intact zinc finger motif of the C1B domain is critical for stability and activity of diacylglycerol kinase-ε

Diacylglycerol kinase-ε (DGKε) phosphorylates DAG to phosphatidic acid with unique specificity toward 18:0/20:4 DAG (SAG). SAG is a typical backbone of phosphatidylinositol and its derivatives, therefore DGKε activity is crucial for the turnover of these signaling lipids. Malfunction of DGKε contributes to several pathophysiological conditions, including atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) linked with DGKE mutations. In the present study we analyzed the role of a zinc finger motif of the C1B domain of DGKε, as some aHUS-linked mutations affect this ill-defined part of the kinase. For this, we introduce a novel fluorescent assay for determination of DGKε activity which relies on the use of NBD-SAG in mixed micelles as a substrate, followed by TLC separation of NBD-phosphatidic acid formed. The assay reliably determines the activity of purified human GST-DGKε, also endogenous DGKε or overexpressed mouse DGKε-Myc in cell lysates, homogenates, and kinase immunoprecipitates. Using the above assay we found that four amino acids, Cys135, Cys138, His161 and Cys164, forming the zinc finger motif in the C1B domain are required for the DGKε-Myc activity and stability. Substitution of any of these amino acids with Ala or Trp in DGKε-Myc abolished its activity and led to its proteasomal degradation, possibly assisted by Hsp70/90/40 chaperones. Inhibition of the 26S proteasome prevented the degradation but the mutated proteins were inactive. The present data on the deleterious effect of the zinc finger motif disruption contribute to the understanding of the DGKε-linked aHUS, as the Cys164Trp substitution in mouse DGKε corresponds to the Cys167Trp one in human DGKε found in some aHUS patients.

Diagnosis and treatment of thrombotic microangiopathy

Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is characterized by thrombocytopenia, microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia and end organ damage. TMAs have varying underlying pathophysiology and can therefore present with an array of clinical presentations. Renal involvement is common as the kidney is particularly susceptible to the endothelial damage and microvascular occlusion. TMAs require rapid assessment, diagnosis, and commencement of appropriate treatment due to the high morbidity and mortality associated with them. Ground-breaking research into the pathogenesis of TMAs over the past 20 years has driven the successful development of targeted therapeutics revolutionizing patient outcomes. This review outlines the clinical presentations, pathogenesis, diagnostic tests and treatments for TMAs.

The Glomerular Endothelium Restricts Albumin Filtration

Inflammatory activation and/or dysfunction of the glomerular endothelium triggers proteinuria in many systemic and localized vascular disorders. Among them are the thrombotic microangiopathies, many forms of glomerulonephritis, and acute inflammatory episodes like sepsis and COVID-19 illness. Another example is the chronic endothelial dysfunction that develops in cardiovascular disease and in metabolic disorders like diabetes. While the glomerular endothelium is a porous sieve that filters prodigious amounts of water and small solutes, it also bars the bulk of albumin and large plasma proteins from passing into the glomerular filtrate. This endothelial barrier function is ascribed predominantly to the endothelial glycocalyx with its endothelial surface layer, that together form a relatively thick, mucinous coat composed of glycosaminoglycans, proteoglycans, glycolipids, sialomucins and other glycoproteins, as well as secreted and circulating proteins. The glycocalyx/endothelial surface layer not only covers the glomerular endothelium; it extends into the endothelial fenestrae. Some glycocalyx components span or are attached to the apical endothelial cell plasma membrane and form the formal glycocalyx. Other components, including small proteoglycans and circulating proteins like albumin and orosomucoid, form the endothelial surface layer and are bound to the glycocalyx due to weak intermolecular interactions. Indeed, bound plasma albumin is a major constituent of the endothelial surface layer and contributes to its barrier function. A role for glomerular endothelial cells in the barrier of the glomerular capillary wall to protein filtration has been demonstrated by many elegant studies. However, it can only be fully understood in the context of other components, including the glomerular basement membrane, the podocytes and reabsorption of proteins by tubule epithelial cells. Discovery of the precise mechanisms that lead to glycocalyx/endothelial surface layer disruption within glomerular capillaries will hopefully lead to pharmacological interventions that specifically target this important structure.