Serological profiling reveals hsa-miR-451a as a possible biomarker of anaphylaxis

Perioperative anaphylaxis: updates on pathophysiology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Perioperative anaphylaxis has historically been attributed to IgE/FcεRI-mediated reactions; there is now recognition of allergic and nonallergic triggers encompassing various reactions beyond IgE-mediated responses. This review aims to present recent advancements in knowledge regarding the mechanisms and pathophysiology of perioperative anaphylaxis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Emerging evidence highlights the role of the mast-cell related G-coupled protein receptor X2 pathway in direct mast cell degranulation, shedding light on previously unknown mechanisms. This pathway, alongside traditional IgE/FcεRI-mediated reactions, contributes to the complex nature of anaphylactic reactions. Investigations into the microbiota-anaphylaxis connection are ongoing, with potential implications for future treatment strategies. While serum tryptase levels serve as mast cell activation indicators, identifying triggers remains challenging. A range of mediators have been associated with anaphylaxis, including vasoactive peptides, proteases, lipid molecules, cytokines, chemokines, interleukins, complement components, and coagulation factors.

SUMMARY

Further understanding of clinical endotypes and the microenvironment where anaphylactic reactions unfold is essential for standardizing mediator testing and characterization in perioperative anaphylaxis. Ongoing research aims to elucidate the mechanisms, pathways, and mediators involved across multiple organ systems, including the cardiovascular, respiratory, and integumentary systems, which will be crucial for improving patient outcomes.

Detecting Changes in Mast Cell Numbers Versus Activation in Human Disease: A Roadblock for Current Biomarkers?

The pathophysiology of mast cell (MC)-driven disorders is diverse, ranging from localized reactions to systemic disorders caused by abnormal accumulation and activation in multiorgan systems. Prompt and accurate diagnosis is critically important, both for informing treatment and objective assessment of treatment outcomes. As new therapeutics are being developed to deplete MCs or silence them (eg, by engaging inhibitory receptors that block activation), new biomarkers are needed that can distinguish between MC activation versus burden. Serum tryptase is the gold standard for assessing both MC burden and activation; however, commercial tryptase assays have limitations related to timing of release, lack of discernment between inactive (α) and active (β) forms of tryptase, and interpatient variability of baseline levels. Alternative approaches to measuring MC activation include urinary MC mediators, flow cytometry-based assays or gene expression profiling. Additional markers of MC activation are needed for use in clinical diagnostics, to help selection of treatment of MC diseases, and for assessing outcomes of therapy. We review the spectrum of disorders with known or suspected MC contribution, describe the utility and limitations of current MC markers and assays, and discuss the need for new markers that can differentiate between MC activation and burden.

Proteomic, miRNA and bacterial biomarker patterns in atopic dermatitis patients and their course upon anti-IL-4Rα therapy

BACKGROUND

Identification of biomarkers is required for a systems medicine approach and personalized treatment in atopic dermatitis (AD). These biomarkers may not only aid in diagnosing but also might be suitable to predict the effectiveness of targeted treatment.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify proteomic, microbial and miRNA biomarkers in AD patients and investigated their course in relation to the clinical response upon anti-IL-4Rα therapy.

METHODS

Proteomic and miRNA screening was performed in AD patients in comparison to healthy controls. Differentially regulated serum proteins, miRNA and selected skin microbiota were measured consecutively in 50 AD patients before and upon systemic dupilumab treatment. A random forest classifier was used to predict the outcome of dupilumab therapy based on the initial biomarker patterns.

RESULTS

We identified 27 proteomic candidates, miRNA and three microbial strains to be dysregulated in AD. CCL17, CCL13, CCL22, E-selectin and BDNF were differently regulated and significantly associated with treatment response. In contrast, neither the microbial composition nor the miRNA pattern was associated with treatment response upon dupilumab treatment.

CONCLUSION

AD patients display defined dysregulations regarding their systemic proteomic serum profile, miRNA patterns and their skin microbiome. The proteomic profile and selected skin bacteria changed profoundly upon anti-IL-4Rα therapy which was associated with an overall clinical response. This was not seen in miRNA-related biomarkers. Our findings support the hypothesis that biomarker profiles reflect treatment responses and may in the future be used to develop a personalized medicine approach for the treatment of AD patients.

Circulating microRNA signatures in patients with chronic Urticaria

Background: Chronic Urticaria (CU) is a complex skin disease that appears as recurrent raised itchy rash/angioedema or both for more than six weeks. The pathophysiology of CU is complex and has yet to be understood entirely. It is predominantly a mast cell-driven disease with the possible involvement of type 2 inflammation. Current evidence largely favors mast cell activation by an IgE-mediated autoallergic mechanism or an autoimmune mechanism by IgG autoantibodies to IgE/ high-affinity receptor of IgE. MicroRNAs (miRNA) are small coding RNAs regulating gene expression at the post-transcription level. This study aimed to investigate the circulating miRNA as potential biomarkers in CU patients compared to healthy controls. Methods: The miRNA gene expression was done in seven patients with CU and seven healthy controls. The expression of miRNA is done using TaqMan openArray human advanced miRNA Panel. ExpressionSuite Software (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) is used for data analysis to quantify the miRNA expressions. P<0.05 is considered to be statistically significant. Results: A significant upregulation (p<0.05) in the miR-451a, miR-9-5p, miR-150-5p, miR-296-5p, and miR-182-5p was observed in CU compared to controls. Dysregulation of miR-451a is identified as an early biomarker in allergic diseases. Functional enrichment analysis with the KEGG pathway and disease ontology databases showed that these miRNAs were associated with skin diseases and inflammation. The differentially expressed miRNAs contribute to determining the genes regulated in CU. miRNA-based therapies that target different genes in a given pathway might be a potential candidate for treating CU. Conclusion: miRNA field has grown steadily over the past few years, but the role of circulating miRNAs in CU remains relatively unexplored. This study showed that the upregulated circulating miRNA might play an essential role in CU pathogenesis and inflammation. Also, our study highlights the importance of miRNAs as a future biomarker and potential therapeutic target to be investigated.

Novel mediator in anaphylaxis: decreased levels of miR-375-3p in serum and within extracellular vesicles of patients

Introduction

Anaphylaxis is among the most severe manifestations of allergic disorders, but its molecular basis remains largely unknown and reliable diagnostic markers are not currently available. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) regulate several pathophysiological processes and have been proposed as non-invasive biomarkers. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate their involvement in anaphylactic reaction and their value as biomarkers.

Methods

Acute (anaphylaxis) and baseline (control) serum samples from 67 patients with anaphylaxis were studied. Among them, 35 were adults with drug-induced anaphylaxis, 13 adults with food-induced anaphylaxis and 19 children with food-induced anaphylaxis. The circulating serum miRNAs profile was characterized by next-generation sequencing (NGS). For this purpose, acute and baseline samples from 5 adults with drug-induced anaphylaxis were used. RNA was extracted, retrotranscribed, sequenced and the readings obtained were mapped to the human database miRBase_20. In addition, a system biology analysis (SBA) was performed with its target genes and revealed pathways related to anaphylactic mediators signaling. Moreover, functional and molecular endothelial permeability assays were conducted with miR-375-3p-transfected cells in response to cAMP.

Results

A total of 334 miRNAs were identified, of which 21 were significant differentially expressed between both phases. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) were characterized by Western blot, electron microscopy and NanoSight. A decrease of miR-375-3p levels was determined by qPCR in both serum and EVs of patients with anaphylaxis (****p<.0001). Precisely, the decrease of miR-375-3p correlated with the increase of two inflammatory cytokines: monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). On the other hand, functional and molecular data obtained showed that miR-375-3p partially blocked the endothelial barrier maintenance and stabilization by disassembly of cell-cell junctions exhibiting low Rac1-Cdc42 levels.

Discussion

These findings demonstrate a differential serum profile of circulating miRNAs in patients with anaphylaxis and exhibit the miR-375-3p modulation in serum and EVs during drug- and food-mediated anaphylactic reactions. Furthermore, the in silico and in vitro studies show a negative role for miR-375-3p/Rac1-Cdc42 in the endothelial barrier stability.

Recent insights into the mechanisms of anaphylaxis

Anaphylaxis is an acute life-threatening systemic allergic reaction that can have a wide range of clinical manifestations. The most common triggers for anaphylaxis include food, medication, and venom. What is curious regarding anaphylaxis is how so many different agents can induce a severe systemic clinical response but only in a select subgroup of patients. Over the past decade, several important advances have been made in understanding the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms contributing to anaphylaxis, with mast cells (MCs) being an essential component. Classically, cross-linked immunoglobulin E (IgE) bound to its high- affinity receptor induces MC mediator release. However, toll-like, complement, or Mas-related G-protein-coupled receptors also activate mouse and human MCs. While anaphylaxis secondary to foods historically has been more extensively characterized clinically and mechanistically, more recent studies have shifted focus toward understanding drug-induced anaphylaxis. The focus of this review is to highlight recent basic science developments and compare what is currently known regarding anaphylaxis to food, medications, and venom.

Anaphylaxis: Advances in the Past 10 Years

In the past 10 years, anaphylaxis has grown into its own special area of study within Allergy-Immunology, both at the bench and at the bedside. This review focuses on some of the most clinically relevant advances over the past decade. These include simplified and more inclusive diagnostic criteria for adults and children, uniform definition of biphasic anaphylaxis, and improved systems for objective severity grading. Studies reported in the past decade have led to improved understanding of normal and abnormal regulation of mast cell function, translating into better diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to patients with anaphylaxis. Research has provided improved recognition and treatment of mast cell disorders and has identified a new condition, hereditary α-tryptasemia, that may impact anaphylactic syndromes. We have learned to recognize new causes (α-gal), new pathways (Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor-X2), and many risk factors for severe anaphylaxis. The stability of epinephrine in autoinjectors was reported to be very good for several years after the labeled expiry date, and it can tolerate freezing and thawing. Repeated and prolonged exposure to excessive heat leads to degradation of epinephrine activity. New treatments to prevent severe anaphylaxis have been described, using new ways to block the IgE receptor or modulate intracellular signaling pathways.

An update on anaphylaxis and urticaria

Notable scientific developments have taken place in the field of anaphylaxis and urticaria in recent years; they are highlighted in this review. Case-control studies, genome-wide association studies, and large omics analyses have promoted further insights into not only the underlying genetics but also the biomarkers of both anaphylaxis and urticaria. New evidence regarding IgE-dependent and non-IgE-dependent mechanisms of anaphylaxis and urticaria, including the Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor (MRGPR [formerly MRG]) signaling pathway, has been gained. Putative elicitors of anaphylactic reactions in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management and course of chronic urticaria have been reported. Clinical progress has also been made regarding the severity grading and risk factors of anaphylaxis, as well as the distinction of phenotypes and elicitors of both diseases. Furthermore, novel treatment approaches for anaphylaxis and subtypes of urticaria have been assessed, with different outcome and potential for a better disease control or prevention.

The Crosstalk between FcεRI and Sphingosine Signaling in Allergic Inflammation

Sphingolipid molecules have recently attracted attention as signaling molecules in allergic inflammation diseases. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is synthesized by two isoforms of sphingosine kinases (SPHK 1 and SPHK2) and is known to be involved in various cellular processes. S1P levels reportedly increase in allergic inflammatory diseases, such as asthma and anaphylaxis. FcεRI signaling is necessary for allergic inflammation as it can activate the SPHKs and increase the S1P level; once S1P is secreted, it can bind to the S1P receptors (S1PRs). The role of S1P signaling in various allergic diseases is discussed. Increased levels of S1P are positively associated with asthma and anaphylaxis. S1P can either induce or suppress allergic skin diseases in a context-dependent manner. The crosstalk between FcεRI and S1P/SPHK/S1PRs is discussed. The roles of the microRNAs that regulate the expression of the components of S1P signaling in allergic inflammatory diseases are also discussed. Various reports suggest the role of S1P in FcεRI-mediated mast cell (MC) activation. Thus, S1P/SPHK/S1PRs signaling can be the target for developing anti-allergy drugs.

An interdisciplinary approach to characterize peanut-allergic patients-First data from the FOOD@ consortium

Background

Peanut allergy is a frequent cause of food allergy and potentially life‐threatening. Within this interdisciplinary research approach, we aim to unravel the complex mechanisms of peanut allergy. As a first step were applied in an exploratory manner the analysis of peanut allergic versus non‐allergic controls.

Methods

Biosamples were studied regarding DNA methylation signatures, gut microbiome, adaptive and innate immune cell populations, soluble signaling molecules and allergen‐reactive antibody specificities. We applied a scalable systems medicine computational workflow to the assembled data.

Results

We identified combined cellular and soluble biomarker signatures that stratify donors into peanut‐allergic and non‐allergic with high specificity. DNA methylation profiling revealed various genes of interest and stool microbiota differences in bacteria abundances.

Conclusion

By extending our findings to a larger set of patients (e.g., children vs. adults), we will establish predictors for food allergy and tolerance and translate these as for example, indicators for interventional studies.

Circulating microRNA signatures associated with disease severity and outcome in COVID-19 patients

Background

SARS-CoV-2 induces a spectrum of clinical conditions ranging from asymptomatic infection to life threatening severe disease. Host microRNAs have been involved in the cytokine storm driven by SARS-CoV-2 infection and proposed as candidate biomarkers for COVID-19.

Methods

To discover signatures of circulating miRNAs associated with COVID-19, disease severity and mortality, small RNA-sequencing was performed on serum samples collected from 89 COVID-19 patients (34 severe, 29 moderate, 26 mild) at hospital admission and from 45 healthy controls (HC). To search for possible sources of miRNAs, investigation of differentially expressed (DE) miRNAs in relevant human cell types in vitro.

Results

COVID-19 patients showed upregulation of miRNAs associated with lung disease, vascular damage and inflammation and downregulation of miRNAs that inhibit pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, angiogenesis, and stress response. Compared with mild/moderate disease, patients with severe COVID-19 had a miRNA signature indicating a profound impairment of innate and adaptive immune responses, inflammation, lung fibrosis and heart failure. A subset of the DE miRNAs predicted mortality. In particular, a combination of high serum miR-22-3p and miR-21-5p, which target antiviral response genes, and low miR-224-5p and miR-155-5p, targeting pro-inflammatory factors, discriminated severe from mild/moderate COVID-19 (AUROC 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.95, p<0.0001), while high leukocyte count and low levels of miR-1-3p, miR-23b-3p, miR-141-3p, miR-155-5p and miR-4433b-5p predicted mortality with high sensitivity and specificity (AUROC 0.95, 95% CI 0.89-1.00, p<0.0001). In vitro experiments showed that some of the DE miRNAs were modulated directly by SARS-CoV-2 infection in permissive lung epithelial cells.

Conclusions

We discovered circulating miRNAs associated with COVID-19 severity and mortality. The identified DE miRNAs provided clues on COVID-19 pathogenesis, highlighting signatures of impaired interferon and antiviral responses, inflammation, organ damage and cardiovascular failure as associated with severe disease and death.