Divergent responses to kisspeptin in children with delayed puberty

Genetic architecture of self-limited delayed puberty and congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism

Distinguishing between self limited delayed puberty (SLDP) and congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH) may be tricky as they share clinical and biochemical characteristics. and appear to lie within the same clinical spectrum. However, one is classically transient (SDLP) while the second is typically a lifetime condition (CHH). The natural history and long-term outcomes of these two conditions differ significantly and thus command distinctive approaches and management. Because the first presentation of SDLP and CHH is very similar (delayed puberty with low LH and FSH and low sex hormones), the scientific community is scrambling to identify diagnostic tests that can allow a correct differential diagnosis among these two conditions, without having to rely on the presence or absence of phenotypic red flags for CHH that clinicians anyway seem to find hard to process. Despite the heterogeneity of genetic defects so far reported in DP, genetic analysis through next-generation sequencing technology (NGS) had the potential to contribute to the differential diagnostic process between SLDP and CHH. In this review we will provide an up-to-date overview of the genetic architecture of these two conditions and debate the benefits and the bias of performing genetic analysis seeking to effectively differentiate between these two conditions.

Advances in clinical applications of kisspeptin-GnRH pathway in female reproduction

BACKGROUND

Kisspeptin is the leading upstream regulator of pulsatile and surge Gonadotrophin-Releasing Hormone secretion (GnRH) in the hypothalamus, which acts as the key governor of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovary axis.

MAIN TEXT

Exogenous kisspeptin or its receptor agonist can stimulate GnRH release and subsequent physiological gonadotropin secretion in humans. Based on the role of kisspeptin in the hypothalamus, a broad application of kisspeptin and its receptor agonist has been recently uncovered in humans, including central control of ovulation, oocyte maturation (particularly in women at a high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome), test for GnRH neuronal function, and gatekeepers of puberty onset. In addition, the kisspeptin analogs, such as TAK-448, showed promising agonistic activity in healthy women as well as in women with hypothalamic amenorrhoea or polycystic ovary syndrome.

CONCLUSION

More clinical trials should focus on the therapeutic effect of kisspeptin, its receptor agonist and antagonist in women with reproductive disorders, such as hypothalamic amenorrhoea, polycystic ovary syndrome, and endometriosis.

An Approach to the Patient With Delayed Puberty

Pediatric endocrinologists often evaluate and treat youth with delayed puberty. Stereotypically, these patients are 14-year-old young men who present due to lack of pubertal development. Concerns about stature are often present, arising from gradual shifts to lower height percentiles on the population-based, cross-sectional curves. Fathers and/or mothers may have also experienced later than average pubertal onset. In this review, we will discuss a practical clinical approach to the evaluation and management of youth with delayed puberty, including the differential diagnosis and key aspects of evaluation and management informed by recent review of the existing literature. We will also discuss scenarios that pose additional clinical challenges, including: (1) the young woman whose case poses questions regarding how presentation and approach differs for females vs males; (2) the 14-year-old female or 16-year-old young man who highlight the need to reconsider the most likely diagnoses, including whether idiopathic delayed puberty can still be considered constitutional delay of growth and puberty at such late ages; and finally (3) the 12- to 13-year-old whose presentation raises questions about whether age cutoffs for the diagnosis and treatment of delayed puberty should be adjusted downward to coincide with the earlier onset of puberty in the general population.

Targeting hepatic kisspeptin receptor ameliorates nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a mouse model

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the most common liver disease, has become a silent worldwide pandemic. The incidence of NAFLD correlates with the rise in obesity, type 2 diabetes, and metabolic syndrome. A hallmark featureof NAFLD is excessive hepatic fat accumulation or steatosis, due to dysregulated hepatic fat metabolism, which can progress to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), fibrosis, and cirrhosis. Currently, there are no approved pharmacotherapies to treat this disease. Here, we have found that activation of the kisspeptin 1 receptor (KISS1R) signaling pathway has therapeutic effects in NAFLD. Using high-fat diet-fed mice, we demonstrated that a deletion of hepatic Kiss1r exacerbated hepatic steatosis. In contrast, enhanced stimulation of KISS1R protected against steatosis in wild-type C57BL/6J mice and decreased fibrosis using a diet-induced mouse model of NASH. Mechanistically, we found that hepatic KISS1R signaling activates the master energy regulator, AMPK, to thereby decrease lipogenesis and progression to NASH. In patients with NAFLD and in high-fat diet-fed mice, hepatic KISS1/KISS1R expression and plasma kisspeptin levels were elevated, suggesting a compensatory mechanism to reduce triglyceride synthesis. These findings establish KISS1R as a therapeutic target to treat NASH.

Review of human genetic and clinical studies directly relevant to GnRH signalling

GnRH is the pivotal hormone in controlling the hypothalamic-pituitary gonadal (HPG) axis in humans and other mammalian species. GnRH function is influenced by a multitude of known and still unknown environmental and genetic factors. Molecular genetic studies on human families with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism over the past two decades have been instrumental in delineating the kisspeptin and neurokinin B signalling, which integrally modulates GnRH release from the hypothalamus. The identification of kisspeptin and neurokinin B ligand-receptor gene pair mutations in patients with absent puberty have paved the way to a greater understanding of the central regulation of the HPG cascade. In this article, we aim to review the literature on the genetic and clinical aspects of GnRH and its receptor, as well as the two ligand-receptor sets directly pertinent to the function of GnRH hormone signalling, kisspeptin/ kisspeptin receptor and NKB/NK3R.

ENDO-ERN expert opinion on the differential diagnosis of pubertal delay

The differential diagnoses of pubertal delay include hypergonadotropic hypogonadism and congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH), as well as constitutional delay of growth and puberty (CDGP). Distinguishing between CDGP and CHH may be challenging, and the scientific community has been struggling to develop diagnostic tests that allow an accurate differential diagnosis. Indeed, an adequate and timely management is critical in order to enable optimal clinical and psychosocial outcomes of the different forms of pubertal delays. In this review, we provide an updated insight on the differential diagnoses of pubertal delay, including the available tests, their meanings and accuracy, as well as some clues to effectively orientate towards either constitutional pubertal delay or pathologic CHH and hypergonadotropic hypogonadism.

Kisspeptin-54 Accurately Identifies Hypothalamic Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Neuronal Dysfunction in Men with Congenital Hypogonadotropic Hypogonadism

BACKGROUND

Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) is hypogonadism due to either hypothalamic or pituitary dysfunction. While gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) can directly test pituitary function, no specific test of hypothalamic function exists. Kisspeptin-54 (KP54) is a neuropeptide that directly stimulates hypothalamic GnRH release and thus could be used to specifically interrogate hypothalamic function. Congenital HH (CHH) is typically due to variants in genes that control hypothalamic GnRH neuronal migration or function. Thus, we investigated whether KP54 could accurately identify hypothalamic dysfunction in men with CHH.

METHODS

Men with CHH (n = 21) and healthy eugonadal men (n = 21) received an intravenous bolus of either GnRH (100 μg) or KP54 (6.4 nmol/kg), on 2 occasions, and were monitored for 6 h after administration of each neuropeptide.

RESULTS

Maximal luteinizing hormone (LH) rise after KP54 was significantly greater in healthy men (12.5 iU/L) than in men with CHH (0.4 iU/L; p < 0.0001). KP54 more accurately differentiated CHH men from healthy men than GnRH (area under receiver operating characteristic curve KP54: 1.0, 95% CI 1.0-1.0; GnRH: 0.88, 95% CI 0.76-0.99). Indeed, all CHH men had an LH rise <2.0 iU/L following KP54, whereas all healthy men had an LH rise >4.0 iU/L. Anosmic men with CHH (i.e., Kallmann syndrome) had even lower LH rises after KP54 than did normosmic men with CHH (p = 0.017). Likewise, men identified to have pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in CHH genes had even lower LH rises after KP54 than other men with CHH (p = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

KP54 fully discriminated men with CHH from healthy men. Thus, KP54 could be used to specifically interrogate hypothalamic GnRH neuronal function in patients with CHH.

Using Kisspeptin to Predict Pubertal Outcomes for Youth With Pubertal Delay

CONTEXT

The management of youth with delayed puberty is hampered by difficulty in predicting who will eventually progress through puberty and who will fail to attain adult reproductive endocrine function. The neuropeptide kisspeptin, which stimulates gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) release, can be used to probe the integrity of the reproductive endocrine axis.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether responses to kisspeptin can predict outcomes for individuals with pubertal delay.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We conducted a longitudinal cohort study in an academic medical center of 16 children (3 girls and 13 boys) with delayed or stalled puberty.

INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME MEASURES

Children who had undergone kisspeptin- and GnRH-stimulation tests were followed every 6 months for clinical evidence of progression through puberty. Inhibin B was measured in boys. A subset of participants underwent exome sequencing.

RESULTS

All participants who had responded to kisspeptin with a rise in luteinizing hormone (LH) of 0.8 mIU/mL or greater subsequently progressed through puberty (n = 8). In contrast, all participants who had exhibited LH responses to kisspeptin ≤ 0.4 mIU/mL reached age 18 years without developing physical signs of puberty (n = 8). Thus, responses to kisspeptin accurately predicted later pubertal outcomes (P = .0002). Moreover, the kisspeptin-stimulation test outperformed GnRH-stimulated LH, inhibin B, and genetic testing in predicting pubertal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The kisspeptin-stimulation can assess future reproductive endocrine potential in prepubertal children and is a promising novel tool for predicting pubertal outcomes for children with delayed puberty.

Differential diagnosis between constitutional delay of growth and puberty, idiopathic growth hormone deficiency and congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: a clinical challenge for the pediatric endocrinologist

INTRODUCTION

Differential diagnosis between constitutional delay of growth and puberty (CDGP), partial growth hormone deficiency (pGHD) and congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (cHH) may be difficult. All these conditions usually present with poor growth in pre- or peri-pubertal age and they may recur within one familial setting, constituting a highly variable, but somehow common, spectrum of pubertal delay.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Narrative review of the most relevant English papers published between 1981 and march 2020 using the following search terms "constitutional delay of growth and puberty," "central hypogonadism," "priming," "growth hormone deficiency," "pituitary," "pituitary magnetic resonance imaging," with a special regard to the latest scientific acquisitions.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

CDGP is by far the most prevalent entity in boys and recurs within families. pGHD is a rare, often idiopathic and transient condition, where hypostaturism presents more severely. Specificity of pGHD diagnosis is increased by priming children before growth hormone stimulation test (GHST); pituitary MRI and genetic analysis are recommended to personalize future follow-up. Diagnosing cHH may be obvious when anosmia and eunuchoid proportions concomitate. However, cHH can either overlap with pGHD in forms of multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies (MPHD) or syndromic conditions either with CDGP in family pedigrees, so endocrine workup and genetic investigations are necessary. The use of growth charts, bone age, predictors of adult height, primed GHST and low dose sex steroids (LDSS) treatment are recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

Only a step-by-step diagnostic process based on appropriate endocrine and genetic markers together with LDSS treatment can help achieving the correct diagnosis and optimizing outcomes.

Pubertal delay: the challenge of a timely differential diagnosis between congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and constitutional delay of growth and puberty

Distinguishing between constitutional delay of growth and puberty (CDGP) and congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (CHH) may be challenging. CDGP and CHH appear to belong to the same clinical spectrum (with low sex hormones and low LH and FSH), although one is classically transient and known as a self-limited form of delayed puberty (CDGP) while the other is permanent (CHH). Thus, the clinical history and the outcomes of these two conditions require different approaches, and an adequate and timely management for the patients is mandatory. Since the initial presentation of CDGP and CHH is almost identical and given the similarities of CDGP and partial forms of CHH (i.e. patients with partial and early interrupted pubertal development) the scientific community has been struggling to find some diagnostic tests able to allow an accurate differential diagnosis between these two conditions in delayed puberty. In this review we provide an up to date insight on the tests available, their meanings and accuracy, as well as some clues to effectively differentiate between constitutional pubertal delay and pathologic CHH.

Constitutional delay of puberty versus congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism: Genetics, management and updates

Delayed puberty (DP) affects approximately 2% of adolescents. In the vast majority of patients in both sexes, it is due to constitutional delay of growth and puberty (CDGP), a self-limited condition in which puberty starts later than usual but progresses normally. However, some CDGP patients may benefit from medical intervention with low-dose sex steroids or peroral aromatase inhibitor letrozole (only for boys). Other causes of DP include permanent hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, functional hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (due to chronic diseases and conditions), and gonadal failure. In this review we discuss these themes along with the latest achievements in the field of puberty research, and include a brief synopsis on the differential diagnosis and management of patients with CDGP and congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism.

Paediatric and adult-onset male hypogonadism

The hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis is of relevance in many processes related to the development, maturation and ageing of the male. Through this axis, a cascade of coordinated activities is carried out leading to sustained testicular endocrine function, with gonadal testosterone production, as well as exocrine function, with spermatogenesis. Conditions impairing the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis during paediatric or pubertal life may result in delayed puberty. Late-onset hypogonadism is a clinical condition in the ageing male combining low concentrations of circulating testosterone and specific symptoms associated with impaired hormone production. Testosterone therapy for congenital forms of hypogonadism must be lifelong, whereas testosterone treatment of late-onset hypogonadism remains a matter of debate because of unclear indications for replacement, uncertain efficacy and potential risks. This Primer focuses on a reappraisal of the physiological role of testosterone, with emphasis on the critical interpretation of the hypogonadal conditions throughout the lifespan of the male individual, with the exception of hypogonadal states resulting from congenital disorders of sex development.