THE ROLE OF ENDOTOXIN DURING TYPHOID FEVER AND TULAREMIA IN MAN. 3. HYPERREACTIVITY TO ENDOTOXIN DURING INFECTION

Invited review: Detoxifying endotoxin: time, place and person

Animals that cannot sense endotoxin may die if they are infected by Gram-negative bacteria. Animals that sense endotoxin and respond too vigorously may also die, victims of their own inflammatory reactions. The outcome of Gram-negative bacterial infection is thus determined not only by an individual's ability to sense endotoxin and respond to its presence, but also by numerous phenomena that inactivate endotoxin and/or prevent harmful reactions to it. Endotoxin sensing requires the MD-2/TLR4 recognition complex and occurs principally in local tissues and the liver. This review highlights the known detoxification mechanisms, which include: (i) proteins that facilitate LPS sequestration by plasma lipoproteins, prevent interactions between the bioactive lipid A moiety and MD-2/TLR4, or promote cellular uptake via non-signaling pathway(s); (ii) enzymes that deacylate or dephosphorylate lipid A; (iii) mechanisms that remove LPS and Gram-negative bacteria from the bloodstream; and (iv) neuroendocrine adaptations that modulate LPS-induced mediator production or neutralize pro-inflammatory molecules in the circulation. In general, the mechanisms for sensing and detoxifying endotoxin seem to be compartmentalized (local versus systemic), dynamic, and variable between individuals. They may have evolved to confine infection and inflammation to extravascular sites of infection while preventing harmful systemic reactions. Integration of endotoxin sensing and detoxification is essential for successful host defense.

Lipopolysaccharide sensing an important factor in the innate immune response to Gram-negative bacterial infections: benefits and hazards of LPS hypersensitivity

In this review, we summarize our investigations concerning the differential importance of CD14 and LBP in toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/myeloid differentiation protein-2 (MD-2)-mediated signaling by smooth and rough-form lipopolysaccharide (LPS) chemotypes and include the results obtained in studies with murine and human TLR4-transgenic mice. Furthermore, we present more recent data on the mechanisms involved in the induction of LPS hypersensitivity by bacterial and viral infections and on the reactivity of the hypersensitive host to non-LPS microbial ligands and endogenous mediators. Finally, the effects of pre-existing hypersensitivity on the course and outcome of a super-infection with Salmonella typhimurium or Listeria monocytogenes are summarized.

Severe sepsis and septic shock: the role of gram-negative bacteremia

Abstract Although Gram-negative bacteria have often been implicated in the pathogenesis of severe sepsis and septic shock, how they trigger these often lethal syndromes is uncertain. In particular, the role played by blood-borne bacteria is controversial. This review considers two alternatives. In the first, circulating Gram-negative bacteria induce toxic reactions directly within the vasculature; in the second, the major inflammatory stimulus occurs in local extravascular sites of infection and circulating bacteria contribute little to inducing toxic responses. Evidence for each alternative is found in the literature. Bacteremia and severe sepsis are not so closely linked that the most striking cases can be a model for the rest. Intravascular and extravascular triggers may warrant different approaches to prevention and therapy.

Role of lipopolysaccharide susceptibility in the innate immune response to Salmonella typhimurium infection: LPS, a primary target for recognition of Gram-negative bacteria

Lipopolysaccharide is an important recognition marker by virtue of which the innate immune system senses and reacts against Gram-negative bacteria invading the LPS susceptible host. This review deals with the factors affecting LPS susceptibility and with the role of the latter in the course and outcome of Salmonella typhimurium infection.

Differential cytokine production in stimulated blood cultures from intensive care patients with bacterial infections

Mice infected with bacteria develop an interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) dependent hypersensitivity to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and other bacterial components. The broader aim of this study is to find out whether such hypersensitivity also occurs in patients suffering from bacterial infections. The capacity of stimulated peripheral blood cells from infected, intensive-care patients to produce cytokines (IFN-gamma, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-6 (IL-6)) was compared to that of healthy donors. Culturing of the cells was carried out preferentially in whole blood diluted 1:3. Whole blood cultures (WBC) were stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), whole killed Salmonella typhimurium and Staphylococcus aureus and concanavalin A (ConA), and the cytokine production was determined. Two main findings emerged from this study: The IFN-gamma production by WBC of patients was, compared to healthy donors, markedly suppressed, regardless of stimulus used. Further, patients' WBC exhibited a suppressed TNF-alpha production after stimulation with LPS. Surprisingly, following stimulation with bacteria (S. typhimurium and S. aureus) an elevated TNF-alpha and IL-6 response was obtained. Thus, in severely infected patients the cytokine responses of peripheral blood cells to LPS may be suppressed, while the response to other bacterial components is enhanced.

Enhanced phagocytosis and bactericidal activity of hepatic reticuloendothelial system during endotoxin tolerance

The effects of tolerance to Escherichia coli endotoxin on the phagocytic and bactericidal activity of the hepatic reticuloendothelial system against viable E. coli were examined using ex vivo perfused rat livers. Livers were isolated from control and endotoxin-tolerant rats and perfused with a medium containing 5% homologous serum from either control or tolerant rats. After the addition of the E. coli (2 x 10(7) cells per ml) to the perfusate, the hepatic clearance of the bacteria was followed for 30 min. The highest activation of the hepatic reticuloendothelial system was observed when serum from tolerant animals was added to the perfusate. Under these conditions phagocytosis was 47% (12% in controls), and 37 to 38% of the bacteria were killed (5% in controls). This activation was less when livers obtained from tolerant rats were perfused with serum from controls or with saline only. The data suggests that, during endotoxin tolerance, humoral factors play an important role in the activation of the hepatic reticulendothelial system, although a direct stimulation of Kupffer cells also occurs. The enhancement of phagocytosis by tolerant serum did not require the presence of homologous antibodies and involved the activation of the alternative complement pathway, since it was lost after removal of factor B activity. On the other hand, stimulation of intracellular killing required both complement and specific antibodies. The data suggest a role of endotoxin in the activation of humoral and cellular mechanisms involved in the host resistance to gram-negative bacterial infection.

Anoxemia as the cause of death in shock

The case is presented that both hemorrhagic and septic shock are due to an inadequate oxygen supply to mitochondria of vascular muscle cells in peripheral circulatory beds. Mitochondria disintegrate in the presence of severe hypoxia; this is a normal response which does not, per se, indicate generalized cell damage. Irreversible shock follows when appreciable numbers of the muscle mitochondria become non-functional. The ATP available from glycolysis is inadequate to resynthesize the mitochondrial apparatus and oxygen cannot be used by the damaged mitochondria to produce the needed ATP through oxidative phosphorylation. In the absence of adequate ATP, the tone of these peripheral vessels must fall, leading to irreversible systemic hypotension and death. In hemorrhagic shock, mitochondrial hypoxia of smooth muscle cells is produced by decreased perfusion of the vasa vasorum in the constricted peripheral vessels; in septic shock there is direct competition for oxygen between bacterial cytochromes and muscle mitochondria.

The role of endotoxin during typhoid fever and tularemia in man. IV. The integrity of the endotoxin tolerance mechanisms during infection

Volunteers infected with Salmonella typhosa develop a remarkable hyperreactivity to the pyrogenic and subjective toxic activities of homologous (S. typhos) and heterologous (Pseudomonas) endotoxins. The present studies quantitate this augmented reactivity and demonstrate by three differing approaches that significant tolerance to these endotoxins can be readily induced within the framework of the hyperreactive state. Thus, (a) tolerance induced before illness by repeated daily intravenous injections of the endotoxins remained demonstrable during overt illness, (b) daily intravenous injections of the endotoxins begun during overt illness evoked progressively increasing tolerance, and (c) continuous intravenous infusions of S. typhosa endotoxin during illness rapidly induced a pyrogenic refractory state. Despite unequivocal activation of the endotoxin tolerance mechanisms by any of the above methods, the febrile and toxic course of typhoid fever proceeded unabated. Similarly, in other volunteers with Pasteurella tularensis infection, continuous intravenous infusions of S. typhosa endotoxin evoked initial hyperreactive febrile and subjective toxic responses followed by rapid appearance of a pyrogenic refractory state without modification of the underlying clinical illness. These observations suggest that circulating endotoxin plays no major role in pathogenesis of the sustained fever and toxemia during typhoid fever and tularemia in man. The mechanisms responsible for the systemic hyperreactivity to endotoxin during typhoid fever and tularemia were further investigated. Low grade endotoxemia, nonspecific effects of tissue injury, impaired ability of the reticuloendothelial system to clear circulating endotoxin, and production of cytophilic antibodies capable of sensitizing leukocytes to endotoxin did not appear responsible. Inflammatory reactions to intradermal S. typhosa endotoxin increased significantly during typhoid fever. However, since no such dermal hyperreactivity developed to Pseudomonas endotoxin during typhoid fever nor to S. typhosa endotoxin during tularemia, the systemic hyperreactivity to bacterial endotoxins during typhoid fever and tularemia could not presently be ascribed to enhanced levels of acquired hypersensitivity.