Recipient APOL1 risk alleles associate with death-censored renal allograft survival and rejection episodes

APOL1 nephropathy - a population genetics success story

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

More than a decade ago, apolipoprotein L1 ( APOL1 ) risk alleles designated G1 and G2, were discovered to be causally associated with markedly increased risk for progressive kidney disease in individuals of recent African ancestry. Gratifying progress has been made during the intervening years, extending to the development and clinical testing of genomically precise small molecule therapy accompanied by emergence of RNA medicine platforms and clinical testing within just over a decade.

RECENT FINDINGS

Given the plethora of excellent prior review articles, we will focus on new findings regarding unresolved questions relating mechanism of cell injury with mode of inheritance, regulation and modulation of APOL1 activity, modifiers and triggers for APOL1 kidney risk penetrance, the pleiotropic spectrum of APOL1 related disease beyond the kidney - all within the context of relevance to therapeutic advances.

SUMMARY

Notwithstanding remaining controversies and uncertainties, promising genomically precise therapies targeted at APOL1 mRNA using antisense oligonucleotides (ASO), inhibitors of APOL1 expression, and small molecules that specifically bind and inhibit APOL1 cation flux are emerging, many already at the clinical trial stage. These therapies hold great promise for mitigating APOL1 kidney injury and possibly other systemic phenotypes as well. A challenge will be to develop guidelines for appropriate use in susceptible individuals who will derive the greatest benefit.

Rationale and Design of a Phase 2, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial Evaluating AMP Kinase-Activation by Metformin in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis

Introduction

Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), the most common primary glomerular disease leading to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), is characterized by podocyte injury and depletion, whereas minimal change disease (MCD) has better outcomes despite podocyte injury. Identifying mechanisms capable of preventing podocytopenia during injury could transform FSGS to an "MCD-like" state. Preclinical data have reported conversion of an MCD-like injury to one with podocytopenia and FSGS by inhibition of AMP-kinase (AMPK) in podocytes. Conversely, in FSGS, AMPK-activation using metformin (MF) mitigated podocytopenia and azotemia. Observational studies also support beneficial effects of MF on proteinuria and chronic kidney disease (CKD) outcomes in diabetes. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test MF in podocyte injury with FSGS has not yet been conducted.

Methods

We report the rationale and design of phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled RCT evaluating the efficacy and safety of MF as adjunctive therapy in FSGS. By randomizing 30 patients with biopsy-confirmed FSGS to MF or placebo (along with standard immunosuppression), we will study mechanistic biomarkers that correlate with podocyte injury or depletion and evaluate outcomes after 6 months. We specifically integrate novel urine, blood, and tissue markers as surrogates for FSGS progression along with unbiased profiling strategies.

Results and Conclusion

Our phase 2 trial will provide insight into the potential efficacy and safety of MF as adjunctive therapy in FSGS-a crucial step to developing a larger phase 3 study. The mechanistic assays here will guide the design of other FSGS trials and contribute to understanding AMPK activation as a potential therapeutic target in FSGS. By repurposing an inexpensive agent, our results will have implications for FSGS treatment in resource-poor settings.

Unveiling APOL1 haplotypes in a predominantly African-American cohort of kidney transplant patients: a novel classification using probe-independent quantitative real-time PCR

Introduction

Apolipoprotein-L1 (APOL1) is a primate-specific protein component of high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Two variants of APOL1 (G1 and G2), provide resistance to parasitic infections in African Americans but are also implicated in kidney-related diseases and transplant outcomes in recipients. This study aims to identify these risk variants using a novel probe-independent quantitative real-time PCR method in a high African American recipient cohort. Additionally, it aims to develop a new stratification approach based on a haplotype-centric model.

Methods

Genomic DNA was extracted from recipient PBMCs using SDS lysis buffer and proteinase K. A quantitative PCR assay with modified forward primers and a common reverse primer enabled us to quantitatively identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the 6-bp deletion. Additionally, we used Sanger sequencing to verify our QPCR findings.

Results

Our novel probe-independent qPCR effectively distinguished homozygous wild-type, heterozygous SNPs/deletions, and homozygous SNPs/deletions, with at least 4-fold differences. A high prevalence of APOL1 variants was observed (18% two-risk alleles, 34% one-risk allele) in our recipient cohort. Intriguingly, no significant impact of recipient APOL1 variants on transplant outcomes was observed up to 12-month of follow-ups. Ongoing research will encompass more time points and a larger patient cohort, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation of G1/G2 variant subgroups categorized by new haplotype scores, enriching our understanding.

Conclusion

Our cost-effective and rapid qPCR technique facilitates APOL1 genotyping within hours. Prospective and retrospective studies will enable comparisons with long-term allograft rejection, potentially predicting early/late-stage transplant outcomes based on haplotype evaluation in this diverse group of kidney transplant recipients.

Evaluating ApoL1 Genetic Testing Policy Options for Transplant Centers: A Delphi Consensus Panel Project with Stakeholders

BACKGROUND

Apolipoprotein L1 (ApoL1) variants G1 and G2 are associated with a higher risk of kidney disease. ApoL1 risk variants are predominantly seen in individuals with sub-Saharan African ancestry. In most transplant centers, potential organ donors are being selectively genetically tested for ApoL1 risk variants. Transplant programs have highly variable ApoL1 testing practices and need guidance on essential ApoL1 clinical policy questions.

METHODS

We conducted a Delphi consensus panel focused on ApoL1 clinical policy questions, including who gets tested, who decides whether testing occurs, how test results are shared, who receives test results, and how test results are used. A total of 27 panelists across seven stakeholder groups participated: living kidney donors ( n =4), deceased donor family members ( n =3), recipients of a deceased donor kidney ( n =4), recipients of a living donor kidney ( n =4), nephrologists ( n =4), transplant surgeons ( n =4), and genetic counselors ( n =4). Nineteen panelists (70%) identified as Black. The Delphi panel process involved two rounds of educational webinars and three rounds of surveys administered to panelists, who were asked to indicate whether they support, could live with, or oppose each policy option.

RESULTS

The panel reached consensus on one or more acceptable policy options for each clinical policy question; panelists supported 18 policy options and opposed 15. Key elements of consensus include the following: ask potential donors about African ancestry rather than race; make testing decisions only after discussion with donors; encourage disclosure of test results to blood relatives and organ recipients but do not require it; use test results to inform decision making, but never for unilateral decisions by transplant programs.

CONCLUSIONS

The panel generally supported policy options involving discussion and shared decision making among patients, donors, and family stakeholders. There was general opposition to unilateral decision making and prohibiting donation altogether.

External proficiency testing for histocompatibility and immunogenetics in today and future

The Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics laboratories provide disease association and pharmacogenetic analyses as well as the tests required for transplantation immunology and transfusion medicine. They perform Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) genotyping in patients/recipients and potential donor candidates for solid organ and stem cell transplants using various molecular methods, and determine mismatches. In addition, they also perform HLA antibody tests to detect anti-HLA antibodies in patients and flow cross-matches to evaluate donor-recipient compatibility. Evidence-based clinical guidelines have emphasized the importance of laboratory tests in clinical practices for a long time. Understanding the principles of Quality Control and External Quality Assurance is a fundamental requirement for the effective management of Tissue Typing laboratories. When these processes are effectively implemented, errors in routine assays for transplantation are reduced and quality is improved. In this review, the importance of Quality Assurance, Quality control and proficiency testing in Histocompatibility and Immunogenetic testing, the necessity of external proficiency testing (EPT) for accreditation, and existing and potential EPT programmes will be reviewed and evaluated in the light of the literature.

Multiomics Data Reveal the Important Role of ANXA2R in T Cell-mediated Rejection After Renal Transplantation

BACKGROUND

T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) is a severe issue after renal transplantation, but research on its T cell-receptor (TCR) repertoire is lacking. This study intended to elucidate the TCR repertoire landscape in TCMR and hence identify novel potential targets.

METHODS

A total of 12 multiomics data sets were collected. The TRUST4 algorithm was used to construct and analyze the TCR repertoire in renal allografts with TCMR and stable renal function. Then, novel TCR-related key genes were identified through various criteria and literature research. In bulk transcriptome, cell line, single-cell transcriptome data sets, multiple immune cell infiltration algorithms, and gene set enrichment analysis were used to analyze potential mechanisms of the identified key gene. Twenty-three pathological sections were collected for immunofluorescence staining in the clinical cohort. Finally, the diagnostic and prognostic values of ANXA2R were evaluated in multiple renal transplant data sets.

RESULTS

Allografts with TCMR showed significantly increased clonotype and specific clonal expansion. ANXA2R was found to be a novel key gene for TCMR and showed strong positive connections with the TCR complex and lymphocyte cells, especially CD8 + T cells. Immunofluorescence staining confirmed the existence of ANXA2R + CD8 + T cells, with their percentage significantly elevated in TCMR compared with stable renal function. Finally, both mRNA and protein levels of ANXA2R showed promising diagnostic and prognostic value for renal transplant recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

ANXA2R , identified as a novel TCR-related gene, had critical roles in clinicopathology, diagnosis, and prognosis in renal transplantation, which offered promising potential therapeutic targets.

Barriers to home dialysis and kidney transplantation for socially disadvantaged individuals

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

People with kidney disease facing social disadvantage have multiple barriers to quality kidney care. The aim of this review is to summarize the patient, clinician, and system wide factors that impact access to quality kidney care and discuss potential solutions to improve outcomes for socially disadvantaged people with kidney disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patient level factors such as poverty, insurance, and employment affect access to care, and low health literacy and kidney disease awareness can affect engagement with care. Clinician level factors include lack of early nephrology referral, limited education of clinicians in home dialysis and transplantation, and poor patient-physician communication. System-level factors such as lack of predialysis care and adequate health insurance can affect timely access to care. Neighborhood level socioeconomic factors, and lack of inclusion of these factors into public policy payment models, can affect ability to access care. Moreover, the effects of structural racism and discrimination nay negatively affect the kidney care experience for racially and ethnically minoritized individuals.

SUMMARY

Patient, clinician, and system level factors affect access to and engagement in quality kidney care. Multilevel solutions are critical to achieving equitable care for all affected by kidney disease.

Association of Recipient APOL1 Kidney Risk Alleles With Kidney Transplant Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplant survival in African American recipients is lower compared with non-African American transplant recipients. APOL1 risk alleles (RA) have been postulated as likely contributors. We examined the graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) stratified by APOL1 RA status in a multicenter observational prospective study.

METHODS

The Renal Transplant Outcome Study recruited a cohort of incident KTRs at 3 transplant centers in the Philadelphia area from 1999-2004. KTRs were genotyped for APOL1 RA. Allograft and patient survival rates were compared by the presence and number of APOL1 RA.

RESULTS

Among 221 participants, approximately 43% carried 2 APOL1 RA. Recipients carrying 2 APOL1 RA demonstrated lower graft survival compared with recipients with only 1 or none of APOL1 RA at 1 y posttransplant, independently of other donor and recipient characteristics (adjusted hazard ratio 3.2 [95% confidence interval, 1.0-10.4], P  = 0.05). There was no significant difference in overall survival or graft survival after 3 y posttransplantation. There was no difference in death by APOL1 -risk status ( P  = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Recipients with 2 APOL1 high-risk alleles exhibited lower graft survival 1 y posttransplantation compared with recipients with only 1 or 0 APOL1 RA. Further research is required to study the combined role of the recipient and donor APOL1 genotypes in kidney transplantation.

Multiscale genetic architecture of donor-recipient differences reveals intronic LIMS1 mismatches associated with kidney transplant survival

Donor-recipient (D-R) mismatches outside of human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) contribute to kidney allograft loss, but the mechanisms remain unclear, specifically for intronic mismatches. We quantified non-HLA mismatches at variant-, gene-, and genome-wide scales from single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data of D-Rs from 2 well-phenotyped transplant cohorts: Genomics of Chronic Allograft Rejection (GoCAR; n = 385) and Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation-01/17 (CTOT-01/17; n = 146). Unbiased gene-level screening in GoCAR uncovered the LIMS1 locus as the top-ranked gene where D-R mismatches associated with death-censored graft loss (DCGL). A previously unreported, intronic, LIMS1 haplotype of 30 SNPs independently associated with DCGL in both cohorts. Haplotype mismatches showed a dosage effect, and minor-allele introduction to major-allele-carrying recipients showed greater hazard of DCGL. The LIMS1 haplotype and the previously reported LIMS1 SNP rs893403 are expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) in immune cells for GCC2 (not LIMS1), which encodes a protein involved in mannose-6-phosphase receptor (M6PR) recycling. Peripheral blood and T cell transcriptome analyses associated the GCC2 gene and LIMS1 SNPs with the TGF-β1/SMAD pathway, suggesting a regulatory effect. In vitro GCC2 modulation impacted M6PR-dependent regulation of active TGF-β1 and downstream signaling in T cells. Together, our data link LIMS1 locus D-R mismatches to DCGL via GCC2 eQTLs that modulate TGF-β1-dependent effects on T cells.

Unveiling APOL1 Haplotypes: A Novel Classification Through Probe-Independent Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Introduction

Apolipoprotein-L1 (APOL1) is a primate-specific protein component of high- density lipoprotein (HDL). Two variants of APOL1 (G1 and G2), provide resistance to parasitic infections in African Americans but are also implicated in kidney-related diseases and transplant outcomes in recipients. This study aims to identify these risk variants using a novel probe- independent quantitative real-time PCR method in a high African American recipient cohort. Additionally, it aims to develop a new stratification approach based on haplotype-centric model.

Methods

Genomic DNA was extracted from recipient PBMCs using SDS lysis buffer and proteinase K. Quantitative PCR assay with modified forward primers and a common reverse primer enabled us to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and the 6-bp deletion quantitatively. Additionally, we used sanger sequencing to verify our QPCR findings.

Results

Our novel probe-independent qPCR effectively distinguished homozygous wild-type, heterozygous SNPs/deletion, and homozygous SNPs/deletion, with at least 4-fold differences. High prevalence of APOL1 variants was observed (18% two-risk alleles, 34% one-risk allele) in our recipient cohort. Intriguingly, up to 12-month follow-up revealed no significant impact of recipient APOL1 variants on transplant outcomes. Ongoing research will encompass more time points and a larger patient cohort, allowing a comprehensive evaluation of G1/G2 variant subgroups categorized by new haplotype scores, enriching our understanding.

Conclusions

Our cost-effective and rapid qPCR technique facilitates APOL1 genotyping within hours. Prospective and retrospective studies will enable comparisons with long-term allograft rejection, potentially predicting early/late-stage transplant outcomes based on haplotype evaluation in this diverse group of kidney transplant recipients.

Nonpodocyte Roles of APOL1 Variants: An Evolving Paradigm

Since the seminal discovery of the trypanolytic, exonic variants in apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) and their association with kidney disease in individuals of recent African ancestry, a wide body of research has emerged offering key insights into the mechanisms of disease. Importantly, the podocyte has become a focal point for our understanding of how risk genotype leads to disease, with activation of putative signaling pathways within the podocyte identified as playing a causal role in podocytopathy, FSGS, and progressive renal failure. However, the complete mechanism of genotype-to-phenotype progression remains incompletely understood in APOL1-risk individuals. An emerging body of evidence reports more than podocyte-intrinsic expression of APOL1 risk variants is needed for disease to manifest. This article reviews the seminal data and reports which placed the podocyte at the center of our understanding of APOL1-FSGS, as well as the evident shortcomings of this podocentric paradigm. We examine existing evidence for environmental and genetic factors that may influence disease, drawing from both clinical data and APOL1's fundamental role as an immune response gene. We also review the current body of data for APOL1's impact on nonpodocyte cells, including endothelial cells, the placenta, and immune cells in both a transplant and native setting. Finally, we discuss the implications of these emerging data and how the paradigm of disease might evolve as a result.

HIV-associated nephropathy in children: challenges in a resource-limited setting

HIV infection remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, especially in children living in resource-limited settings. Although the World Health Organization (WHO) recently recommended antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation upon diagnosis regardless of the number of CD4, ART access remains limited, especially in children living in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). HIV-infected children who do not receive appropriate ART are at increased risk of developing HIV-associated nephropathy (HIVAN). Although due to genetic susceptibility, SSA is recognized to be the epicenter of HIVAN, limited information is available regarding the burden of HIVAN in children living in Africa. The present review discusses the information available to date on the prevalence, pathogenesis, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of HIVAN in children, focusing on related challenges in a resource-limited setting.

Comparative evaluation of glomerular morphometric techniques reveals differential technical artifacts between focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and normal glomeruli

Morphometric estimates of mean or individual glomerular volume (MGV, IGV) have biological implications, over and above qualitative histologic data. However, morphometry is time-consuming and requires expertise limiting its utility in clinical cases. We evaluated MGV and IGV using plastic- and paraffin-embedded tissue from 10 control and 10 focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) mice (aging and 5/6th nephrectomy models) using the gold standard Cavalieri (Cav) method versus the 2-profile and Weibel-Gomez (WG) methods and a novel 3-profile method. We compared accuracy, bias and precision, and quantified results obtained when sampling differing numbers of glomeruli. In both FSGS and controls, we identified an acceptable precision for MGV of 10-glomerular sampling versus 20-glomerular sampling using the Cav method, while 5-glomerular sampling was less precise. In plastic tissue, 2- or 3-profile MGVs showed greater concordance with MGV when using Cav, versus MGV with WG. IGV comparisons using the same glomeruli reported a consistent underestimation bias with both 2- or 3-profile methods versus the Cav method. FSGS glomeruli showed wider variations in bias estimation than controls. Our 3-profile method offered incremental benefit to the 2-profile method in both IGV and MGV estimation (improved correlation coefficient, Lin's concordance and reduced bias). In our control animals, we quantified a shrinkage artifact of 52% from tissue processed for paraffin-embedded versus plastic-embedded tissue. FSGS glomeruli showed overall reduced shrinkage albeit with variable artifact signifying periglomerular/glomerular fibrosis. A novel 3-profile method offers slightly improved concordance with reduced bias versus 2-profile. Our findings have implications for future studies using glomerular morphometry.

APOL1 promotes endothelial cell activation beyond the glomerulus

Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) high-risk genotypes are associated with increased risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in people of West African ancestry. Given the importance of endothelial cells (ECs) in CKD, we hypothesized that APOL1 high-risk genotypes may contribute to disease via EC-intrinsic activation and dysfunction. Single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis of the Kidney Precision Medicine Project dataset revealed APOL1 expression in ECs from various renal vascular compartments. Utilizing two public transcriptomic datasets of kidney tissue from African Americans with CKD and a dataset of APOL1-expressing transgenic mice, we identified an EC activation signature; specifically, increased intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) expression and enrichment in leukocyte migration pathways. In vitro, APOL1 expression in ECs derived from genetically modified human induced pluripotent stem cells and glomerular ECs triggered changes in ICAM-1 and platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM-1) leading to an increase in monocyte attachment. Overall, our data suggest the involvement of APOL1 as an inducer of EC activation in multiple renal vascular beds with potential effects beyond the glomerular vasculature.

Early recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in a kidney transplant recipient with APOL1 one risk variant

Apolipoprotein 1 (APOL1) risk variants (G1 and G2) are associated with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) in patients of African ancestry. The prevalence of APOL1 two risk variants is lower in Hispanics and very rare in European and Asian populations. APOL1 two risk variants in donor kidneys is associated with recipient kidney graft loss, however the effect of recipient risk variant in the kidney transplant outcome is unclear. Here, we present a late adolescent male with FSGS and end stage renal disease with one APOL1 risk variant (G2) who had immediate recurrence of FSGS in the post-KT period. There was an excellent response to few sessions of plasmapheresis and Rituximab with no further recurrence of FSGS in the 1 year follow-up period. It needs to be seen whether the recipient APOL1 single risk variant causes increased susceptibility to kidney graft loss on a long run via recurrent or de novo pathologies.

Time to Abolish Metrics That Sustain Systemic Racism in Kidney Allocation

This Viewpoint discusses how the Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) in its current form is not fit to guide kidney allocation because it devalues organ donation by Black donors based on a weak association between donor race and kidney transplant failure.

Precision medicine implementation challenges for APOL1 testing in chronic kidney disease in admixed populations

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a public health problem that presents genetic and environmental risk factors. Two alleles in the Apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1) gene were associated with chronic kidney disease; these alleles are common in individuals of African ancestry but rare in European descendants. Genomic studies on Afro-Americans have indicated a higher prevalence and severity of chronic kidney disease in people of African ancestry when compared to other ethnic groups. However, estimates in low- and middle-income countries are still limited. Precision medicine approaches could improve clinical outcomes in carriers of risk alleles in the Apolipoprotein L1 gene through early diagnosis and specific therapies. Nevertheless, to enhance the definition of studies on these variants, it would be necessary to include individuals with different ancestry profiles in the sample, such as Latinos, African Americans, and Indigenous peoples. There is evidence that measuring genetic ancestry improves clinical care for admixed people. For chronic kidney disease, this knowledge could help establish public health strategies for monitoring patients and understanding the impact of the Apolipoprotein L1 genetic variants in admixed populations. Therefore, researchers need to develop resources, methodologies, and incentives for vulnerable and disadvantaged communities, to develop and implement precision medicine strategies and contribute to consolidating diversity in science and precision medicine in clinical practice.

Variant APOL1 protein in plasma associates with larger particles in humans and mouse models of kidney injury

BACKGROUND

Genetic variants in apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1), a protein that protects humans from infection with African trypanosomes, explain a substantial proportion of the excess risk of chronic kidney disease affecting individuals with sub-Saharan ancestry. The mechanisms by which risk variants damage kidney cells remain incompletely understood. In preclinical models, APOL1 expressed in podocytes can lead to significant kidney injury. In humans, studies in kidney transplant suggest that the effects of APOL1 variants are predominantly driven by donor genotype. Less attention has been paid to a possible role for circulating APOL1 in kidney injury.

METHODS

Using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, the concentrations of APOL1 were measured in plasma and urine from participants in the Seattle Kidney Study. Asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation was used to evaluate the size of APOL1-containing lipoprotein particles in plasma. Transgenic mice that express wild-type or risk variant APOL1 from an albumin promoter were treated to cause kidney injury and evaluated for renal disease and pathology.

RESULTS

In human participants, urine concentrations of APOL1 were correlated with plasma concentrations and reduced kidney function. Risk variant APOL1 was enriched in larger particles. In mice, circulating risk variant APOL1-G1 promoted kidney damage and reduced podocyte density without renal expression of APOL1.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that plasma APOL1 is dynamic and contributes to the progression of kidney disease in humans, which may have implications for treatment of APOL1-associated kidney disease and for kidney transplantation.

Treatment potential in APOL1-associated nephropathy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

More than 5 million African-Americans, and millions more in Africa and worldwide, possess apolipoprotein L1 gene (APOL1) high-risk genotypes with an increased risk for chronic kidney disease. This manuscript reviews treatment approaches for slowing the progression of APOL1-associated nephropathy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Since the 2010 discovery of APOL1 as a cause of nondiabetic nephropathy in individuals with sub-Saharan African ancestry, it has become apparent that aggressive hypertension control, renin-angiotensin system blockade, steroids and conventional immunosuppressive agents are suboptimal treatments. In contrast, APOL1-mediated collapsing glomerulopathy due to interferon treatment and HIV infection, respectively, often resolve with cessation of interferon or antiretroviral therapy. Targeted therapies, including APOL1 small molecule inhibitors, APOL1 antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) and inhibitors of APOL1-associated inflammatory pathways, hold promise for these diseases. Evolving therapies and the need for clinical trials support the importance of increased use of APOL1 genotyping and kidney biopsy.

SUMMARY

APOL1-associated nephropathy includes a group of related phenotypes that are driven by the same two genetic variants in APOL1. Clinical trials of small molecule inhibitors, ASO, and inflammatory pathway inhibitors may improve outcomes in patients with primary forms of APOL1-associated nephropathy.

The evolving role of diagnostic genomics in kidney transplantation

Monogenic forms of heritable kidney disease account for a significant proportion of chronic kidney disease (CKD) across both pediatric and adult patient populations and up to 11% of patients under 40 years reaching end-stage kidney failure (KF) and awaiting kidney transplant. Diagnostic genomics in the field of nephrology is ever evolving and now plays an important role in assessment and management of kidney transplant recipients and their related donor pairs. Genomic testing can help identify the cause of KF in kidney transplant recipients and assist in prognostication around graft survival and rate of recurrence of primary kidney disease. If a gene variant has been identified in the recipient, at-risk related donors can be assessed for the same and excluded if affected. This paper aims to address the indications for genomic testing in the context for kidney transplantation, the technologies available for testing, the conditions and groups in which testing should be most often considered, and the role for the renal genetics multidisciplinary team in this process.

Donor–Recipient Non-HLA Variants, Mismatches and Renal Allograft Outcomes: Evolving Paradigms

Despite significant improvement in the rates of acute allograft rejection, proportionate improvements in kidney allograft longevity have not been realized, and are a source of intense research efforts. Emerging translational data and natural history studies suggest a role for anti-donor immune mechanisms in a majority of cases of allograft loss without patient death, even when overt evidence of acute rejection is not identified. At the level of the donor and recipient genome, differences in highly polymorphic HLA genes are routinely evaluated between donor and recipient pairs as part of organ allocation process, and utilized for patient-tailored induction and maintenance immunosuppression. However, a growing body of data have characterized specific variants in donor and recipient genes, outside of HLA loci, that induce phenotypic changes in donor organs or the recipient immune system, impacting transplant outcomes. Newer mechanisms for “mismatches” in these non-HLA loci have also been proposed during donor–recipient genome interactions with transplantation. Here, we review important recent data evaluating the role of non-HLA genetic loci and genome-wide donor-recipient mismatches in kidney allograft outcomes.

The evolving story of apolipoprotein L1 nephropathy: the end of the beginning

Genetic coding variants in APOL1, which encodes apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1), were identified in 2010 and are relatively common among individuals of sub-Saharan African ancestry. Approximately 13% of African Americans carry two APOL1 risk alleles. These variants, termed G1 and G2, are a frequent cause of kidney disease — termed APOL1 nephropathy — that typically manifests as focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and the clinical syndrome of hypertension and arterionephrosclerosis. Cell culture studies suggest that APOL1 variants cause cell dysfunction through several processes, including alterations in cation channel activity, inflammasome activation, increased endoplasmic reticulum stress, activation of protein kinase R, mitochondrial dysfunction and disruption of APOL1 ubiquitinylation. Risk of APOL1 nephropathy is mostly confined to individuals with two APOL1 risk variants. However, only a minority of individuals with two APOL1 risk alleles develop kidney disease, suggesting the need for a ‘second hit’. The best recognized factor responsible for this ‘second hit’ is a chronic viral infection, particularly HIV-1, resulting in interferon-mediated activation of the APOL1 promoter, although most individuals with APOL1 nephropathy do not have an obvious cofactor. Current therapies for APOL1 nephropathies are not adequate to halt progression of chronic kidney disease, and new targeted molecular therapies are in clinical trials.

This Review summarizes current understanding of the role of APOL1 variants in kidney disease. The authors discuss the genetics, protein structure and biological functions of APOL1 variants and provide an overview of promising therapeutic strategies.

In contrast to other APOL family members, which are primarily intracellular, APOL1 contains a unique secretory signal peptide, resulting in its secretion into plasma.

APOL1 renal risk alleles provide protection from African human trypanosomiasis but are a risk factor for progressive kidney disease in those carrying two risk alleles.

APOL1 risk allele frequency is ~35% in the African American population in the United States, with ~13% of individuals having two risk alleles; the highest allele frequencies are found in West African populations and their descendants.

Cell and mouse models implicate endolysosomal and mitochondrial dysfunction, altered ion channel activity, altered autophagy, and activation of protein kinase R in the pathogenesis of APOL1-associated kidney disease; however, the relevance of these injury pathways to human disease has not been resolved.

APOL1 kidney disease tends to be progressive, and current standard therapies are generally ineffective; targeted therapeutic strategies hold the most promise.

APOL1 risk variants in kidney transplantation: a modulation of immune cell function

APOL1 G1 and G2 variants are established risk factors for nondiabetic kidney disease. The presence of two APOL1 risk variants in donor kidneys negatively impacts kidney allograft survival. Because of evolutionary pressure, the APOL1 risk variants have become common in people from Africa and in those with recent African ancestry. APOL1 risk variant proteins are expressed in kidney cells and can cause toxicity to these cells. In this issue of the JCI, Zhang, Sun, and colleagues show that recipient APOL1 risk variants negatively affect kidney allograft survival and T cell-mediated rejection rates, independent of donor APOL1 genotype or recipient ancestry. The authors provide evidence that APOL1 risk variants play an immunomodulatory role in T cells and NK cells in the setting of kidney transplantation. These findings have important clinical implications that require further investigation.