Peptide-based treatment for autoimmune diseases: learning how to handle a double-edged sword

β1-Adrenoreceptor Autoantibodies in Heart Failure: Physiology and Therapeutic Implications

Antibodies that activate the β₁-AR (β₁-adrenoreceptor) can induce heart failure in animal models. These antibodies are often found in patients with heart failure secondary to varying etiologies. Their binding to the β₁ receptor leads to prolonged receptor activation with subsequent induction of cellular dysfunction, apoptosis, and arrhythmias. β-blocker therapy while highly effective for heart failure, may not be sufficient treatment for patients who have β₁ receptor autoantibodies. Removal of these autoantibodies by immunoadsorption has been shown to improve heart failure in small studies. However, immunoadsorption is costly, time consuming, and carries potential risks. An alternative to immunoadsorption is neutralization of autoantibodies through the intravenous application of small soluble molecules, such as peptides or aptamers, which specifically target and neutralize β₁-AR autoantibodies. Peptides may induce immunogenicity. Animal as well as early phase human studies with aptamers have not shown safety concerns to date and have demonstrated effectiveness in reducing autoantibody levels. Novel aptamers have the potential advantage of having a wide spectrum of action, neutralizing a variety of known circulating G-protein coupled receptor autoantibodies. These aptamers, therefore, have the potential to be novel therapeutic option for patients with heart failure who have positive for β₁-AR autoantibodies. However, clinical outcomes trials are needed to assess the clinical utility of this novel approach to treat heart failure.

Generation of gene-engineered chimeric DNA molecules for specific therapy of autoimmune diseases

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease characterized by the development of self-reactive B and T cells and autoantibody production. In particular, double-stranded DNA-specific B cells play an important role in lupus progression, and their selective elimination is a reasonable approach for effective therapy of SLE. DNA-based vaccines aim at the induction of immune response against the vector-encoded antigen. Here, we are exploring, as a new DNA-based therapy of SLE, a chimeric DNA molecule encoding a DNA-mimotope peptide, and the Fv but not the immunogenic Fc fragment of an FcγRIIb-specific monoclonal antibody. This DNA construct was inserted in the expression vector pNut and used as a naked DNA vaccine in a mouse model of lupus. The chimeric DNA molecule can be expressed in eukaryotic cells and cross-links cell surface receptors on DNA-specific B cells, delivering an inhibitory intracellular signal. Intramuscular administration of the recombinant DNA molecule to lupus-prone MRL/lpr mice prevented increase in IgG anti-DNA antibodies and was associated with a low degree of proteinuria, modulation of cytokine profile, and suppression of lupus nephritis.

Interventions for latent autoimmune diabetes (LADA) in adults

BACKGROUND

Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) is a slowly developing type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVES

To compare interventions used for LADA.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies were obtained from searches of electronic databases, supplemented by handsearches, conference proceedings and consultation with experts. Date of last search was December 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCT) and controlled clinical trials (CCT) evaluating interventions for LADA or type 2 diabetes with antibodies were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Studies were summarised using meta-analysis or descriptive methods.

MAIN RESULTS

Searches identified 13,306 citations. Fifteen publications (ten studies) were included, involving 1019 participants who were followed between three months to 10 years (1060 randomised). All studies had a high risk of bias. Sulphonylurea (SU) with insulin did not improve metabolic control significantly more than insulin alone at three months (one study, n = 15) and at 12 months (one study, n = 14) of treatment and follow-up. SU (with or without metformin) gave poorer metabolic control compared to insulin alone (mean difference in glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to end of study, for insulin compared to oral therapy: -1.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) -2.4 to -0.1; P = 0.03, 160 participants, four studies, follow-up/duration of therapy: 12, 30, 36 and 60 months; however, heterogeneity was considerable). In addition, there was evidence that SU caused earlier insulin dependence (proportion requiring insulin at two years was 30% in the SU group compared to 5% in conventional care group (P < 0.001); patients classified as insulin dependent was 64% (SU group) and 12.5% (insulin group, P = 0.007). No intervention influenced fasting C-peptide, but insulin maintained stimulated C-peptide better than SU (one study, mean difference 7.7 ng/ml (95% CI 2.9 to 12.5)). In a five year follow-up of GAD65 (glutamic acid decarboxylase formulated with aluminium hydroxide), improvements in fasting and stimulated C-peptide levels (20 μg group) were maintained after five years. Short term (three months) follow-up in one study (n = 74) using Chinese remedies did not demonstrate a significant difference in improving fasting C-peptide levels compared to insulin alone (0.07 µg/L (95% CI -0.05 to 0.19). One study using vitamin D with insulin showed steady fasting C-peptide levels in the vitamin D group but declining fasting C-peptide levels (368 to 179 pmol/L, P = 0.006) in the insulin alone group at 12 months follow-up. Comparing studies was difficult as there was a great deal of heterogeneity in the studies and in their selection criteria. There was no information regarding health-related quality of life, complications of diabetes, cost or health service utilisation, mortality and limited evidence on adverse events (studies on oral agents or insulin reported no adverse events in terms of severe hypoglycaemic episodes).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Two studies show SU leading to earlier insulin dependence and a meta-analysis of four studies with considerable heterogeneity showed poorer metabolic control if SU is prescribed for patients with LADA compared to insulin. One study showed that vitamin D with insulin may protect pancreatic beta cells in LADA. Novel treatments such as GAD65 in certain doses (20 μg) have been suggested to maintain fasting and stimulated C-peptide levels. However, there is no significant evidence for or against other lines of treatment of LADA.

Antigen-based immune therapeutics for type 1 diabetes: magic bullets or ordinary blanks?

The ideal drug of modern medicine is the one that achieves its therapeutic target with minimal adverse effects. Immune therapy of Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is no exception, and knowledge of the antigens targeted by pathogenic T cells offers a unique opportunity towards this goal. Different antigen formulations are being considered, such as proteins or peptides, either in their native form or modified ad hoc, DNA plasmids, and cell-based agents. Translation from mouse to human should take into account important differences, particularly in the time scale of autoimmune progression, and intervention. Critical parameters such as administration route, dosing and interval remain largely empirical and need to be further dissected. T1D staging through immune surrogate markers before and after treatment will be key in understanding therapeutic actions and to finally turn ordinary blanks into magic bullets.

Autoantibodies to tumor-associated antigens: reporters from the immune system

Although autoantibodies have been recognized as participants in pathogenesis of tissue injury, the collateral role of autoantibodies as reporters from the immune system identifying cellular participants in tumorigenesis has not been fully appreciated. The immune system appears to be capable of sensing aberrant structure, distribution, and function of certain cellular components involved in tumorigenesis and making autoantibody responses to the tumor-associated antigens (TAAs). Autoantibodies to TAAs can report malignant transformation before standard clinical studies and may be useful as early detection biomarkers. The autoantibody response also provides insights into factors related to how cellular components may be rendered immunogenic. As diagnostic biomarkers, specific TAA miniarrays for identifying autoantibody profiles could have sufficient sensitivity in differentiating between types of tumors. Such anti-TAA profiles could also be used to monitor response to therapy. The immune system of cancer patients reveals the immune interactive sites or the autoepitopes of participants in tumorigenesis, and this information should be used in the design of immunotherapy.

Insulin as a T cell antigen in type 1 diabetes supported by the evidence from the insulin knockout NOD mice

Rodents have two functional preproinsulin genes named insulin 1 and insulin 2 on different chromosome and have two amino acid differences in insulin B chain. We have established insulin 1 or insulin 2 knockout (KO) non-obese diabetic (NOD) colonies in the animal institute of Kobe University and evaluated anti-insulin autoimmunity. Similar to the previous report, insulin 1-KO provides strong protection from insulitis (islet-infiltration of mononuclear cells) and diabetes, whereas the insulin 2-KO markedly accelerated insulitis and development of diabetes even at further backcross breeding with NOD/Shi/Kbe mice (P<0.0001). Expression of serum anti-insulin autoantibodies (IAA) was enhanced in insulin 2-KO mice at a time between 10 and 15 weeks of age (P<0.005) while the expression of insulin 1-KO NOD mice was rather reduced. Furthermore, T cell reactivity in splenocytes of insulin 2-KO NOD mice to insulin 1 B:9-23 peptide was increased (P<0.05), suggesting that expanding insulin-reactive T cells may contribute to the acceleration of diabetes in insulin 2-KO mice. Based on those observations, we hypothesize that insulin 1 is a crucial T cell antigen in murine autoimmune diabetes and modification of anti-insulin autoimmunity can be applicable to antigen-based therapy for human type 1 diabetic patients.

Deleting islet autoimmunity

Even though there are numerous autoantigens for type 1 diabetes, current evidence suggests that a single autoantigen, namely insulin, is responsible for the key initiating event in autoimmunity. If a single autoantigen is necessary for triggering the autoimmune process, then antigen-specific therapy to block or delete the immune response against that autoantigen before epitope spreading occurs, may become a larger focus of future immunotherapeutic strategies. In this article, we review current literature regarding insulin as an autoantigen and potential approaches to deleting insulin-reactive T cells through the use of peptide vaccines and targeted T cell receptor immunizations.

Interventions for latent autoimmune diabetes (LADA) in adults

BACKGROUND

Latent autoimmune diabetes in Adults (LADA) is a slowly developing type 1 diabetes which presents as non-insulin dependent diabetes and progresses to insulin dependence. However, the best treatment strategy for LADA is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To compare interventions used for LADA.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies were obtained from searches of electronic databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE), supplemented by hand searches, conference proceedings and consultation with experts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Selection was in duplicate by two independent reviewers. RCT and controlled clinical trials evaluating interventions for LADA or type 2 diabetes with antibodies were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality. Studies were summarised in a descriptive manner.

MAIN RESULTS

Searches identified 8067 citations. Eight publications (seven studies) were included, involving 735 participants. All studies had high risk of bias. There were no data on use of metformin or glitazones alone. Rosiglitazone or sulphonylurea (SU) with insulin did not improve metabolic control significantly more than insulin alone. SU alone gave either poorer (one study, mean difference in HbA1c 2.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9 to 4.7) or equivalent metabolic control compared to insulin alone (two studies). There was evidence that SU caused earlier insulin dependence (insulin treated at two years: 60% (SU) and 5% (conventional care) (P < 0.001); classified insulin dependent: 64% (SU) and 12.5% (insulin group) (P = 0.007)). No interventions influenced fasting C-peptide, but insulin maintained stimulated C-peptide better than SU (one study, mean difference 7.7 ng/ml (95% CI 2.9 to 12.5) and insulin with rosiglitazone was superior to insulin alone (one study) at maintaining stimulated C-peptide. A pilot study showed better metabolic control at six months with subcutaneously administered glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) GAD65, a major autoantigen in autoimmune diabetes, compared to placebo. There was no information regarding quality of life, mortality, complications or costs in any of the publications. Time from diagnosis varied between recruitment at diagnosis to recruitment at nine years of disease duration and there was a great deal of variation in the selection criteria for LADA patients, making it difficult to generalise findings from these studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are few studies on this topic and existing studies have a high risk of bias. However, there does seem to be an indication that SU should not be a first line treatment for antibody positive type 2 diabetes. There is no significant evidence for or against other lines of treatment of LADA.

14th International HLA and Immunogenetics Workshop: report on the HLA component of type 1 diabetes

The type 1 diabetes (T1D) component of the 13th International Histocompatibility Workshop (IHW) obtained microsatellite (msat) and human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR/DQ data on case/control and family samples through an international collaboration. The aim was to detect the effects of susceptibility loci on the HLA complex independent of the primary determinants in the class II region (HLA-DR/DQ). As part of the activity of the 14th International HLA and Immunogenetics Workshop (14th IHIWS), a T1D workshop was held to present analyses of the 13th IHW data and to discuss the current status of knowledge about the genetics of T1D. These data are now available online through dbMHC, a web-based resource established by the National Center for Biotechnology. Continuing work since the 13th IHW has resulted in published work showing heterogeneity of DR3 haplotypes in data sets from the 13th IHW and Human Biological Data Interchange (HBDI). In addition, we identified markers that define DRB1*1501 DQB1*0602 haplotypes conferring reduced protection from diabetes in a Swedish 13th IHW data set. Further analyses of the 13th IHW data set not only showed some significant results but also demonstrated extensive heterogeneity reminiscent of non-HLA genes. The haplotype analysis in HBDI families identified two msats with significant effects on susceptibility and statistically significant age of onset effects at class III markers that are not because of linkage disequilibrium, with class I alleles known to affect age of onset. The above studies underscore the importance of refining our understanding of susceptibility associated with genes in the HLA complex.

Targeting T lymphocytes for immune monitoring and intervention in autoimmune diabetes

Recognition of a peptide-MHC complex by the T cell receptor (TCR) is a key interaction that initiates T lymphocyte activation or silencing during an immune response. Fluorochrome-labeled recombinant MHC class II-peptide reagents function as soluble mimetics of this interaction, bind to their specific TCR, and allow for detection of antigen-specific CD4+ T cells. These reagents are now under scrutiny for "immune staging" of patients at risk of type 1 diabetes, in an effort to diagnose islet autoimmunity early enough to block immune-mediated beta cell destruction. Several issues are currently being addressed to improve the performance of these T cell assays: enrichment steps for better sensitivity, multiplexing of several islet epitopes, simultaneous monitoring of CD4+ and CD8+ responses, detection of low avidity T cells, combination of quantitative (number of positive cells) and qualitative (cytokine secretion, naive/memory phenotype) readouts. CD4+ T cells are key effectors of autoimmunity, and these MHC class II peptide reagents, through their signaling properties, might also provide therapeutics to block the autoimmune process at its onset, analogous to the use of OKT3gammao1(AlaAla) anti-CD3 antibody but in an antigen-specific fashion. The aim of such therapeutics is to potentiate different physiological control mechanisms to restore immune tolerance. Mechanisms initiated by this pathway may be capable of triggering elimination of pathogenic T cells through antigen-specific apoptosis and anergy, combined with the induction of regulatory T cells with broad suppressive function.