The dopamine D(4) receptor gene and novelty seeking

The Dopamine D4 Receptor (DRD4) Exon 3 VNTR Contributes to Adaptive Personality Differences in an Italian Small Island Population

The search for evolutionary forces shaping the diversity of human personality traits encouraged studies that have found that islanders are relatively closed and introverted, with little interest in the external world. The ‘personality gene flow’ hypothesis was proposed to explain the mechanism underlying this difference, suggesting that the frequency of alleles that influence islander personality traits might progressively increase in the gene pools on islands because of selective emigration of individuals not displaying these alleles. We genotyped 96 individuals from the Italian mainland and 117 from Giglio Island, whose residents were previously assessed regarding their personality traits. We genotyped three polymorphisms: the dopamine D4 receptor (DRD4) exon 3 repeat region, the serotonin–transporter SLC6A4 5–HTTLPR indel and the dopamine transporter SLC6A3 DAT1 3′UTR repeat region. Only the DRD4 exon 3 repeat was hypothesised to show varying allele frequencies because this polymorphism could be associated with human migration and personality traits such as extraversion, openness and novelty seeking. As predicted, no differences in allele frequencies were found for the SLC6A4 and SLC6A3 polymorphisms, whereas significant differences were observed in the frequency of the DRD4 exon 3 alleles. The DRD4.2 repeat was more common in mainlanders, as expected, whereas the DRD4.7 allele was over–represented among islanders who never emigrated. This last result contradicts the suggested association of this allele with long–distance migrations. We suggest that emigration might have caused gene flow out the island that resulted in somewhat unpredictable changes in the frequencies of specific alleles, thus influencing islander personality traits. Copyright © 2013 European Association of Personality Psychology

Enhanced reactivity and delayed recovery of sensorimotor cortex in the novelty seeking personality

BACKGROUND

The novelty seeking (NS) personality trait is hypothesized to be associated with high cortical reactivity, poor inhibitory control and/or varied dopaminergic neurotransmission in the basal ganglia. After somatosensory stimulation, electrical oscillations in alpha and beta bands generated in the sensorimotor cortex show a short duration decrease (event-related desynchronization) and a subsequent increase (event-related synchronization) that is thought to reflect cortical activation and the inhibitory/recovery process, respectively. These oscillatory changes are also believed to be affected by the status of the basal ganglia and by dopaminergic functions. In the present study, we investigated the association between the NS personality trait and somatosensory oscillatory changes after median nerve stimulation assessed by magnetoencephalography.

METHODS

From 48 healthy subjects, we selected 14 high scorers and 14 age- and sex-matched low scorers on the NS dimension of the Temperament and Character Inventory. Magnetic fields were recorded while subjects received electrical stimulation of either the right or left median nerve with equal probability and with a randomized interstimulus interval. Frequency analysis was performed on the alpha and beta bands.

RESULTS

Compared with the low NS group, the high NS group showed larger magnitude of beta event-related desynchronization and larger latencies of the alpha and beta event-related synchronization.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that individuals with high degrees of the NS trait have greater reactivity and delayed recovery of the sensorimotor cortex in response to simple somatosensory stimulation. This may be significant for the understanding of their exploratory and impulsive behavior.

Dopamine, learning, and impulsivity: a biological account of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

BACKGROUND

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects up to 10% of school-age children. The impulsivity which is seen as its core feature persists over years, yet experimental measures of impulsivity can be altered in a single session. In this study, we tested the theory that both the persistence and the variability of impulsivity could be the result of abnormalities in learning mechanisms and environment.

METHOD

We extended an existing model of the role of dopamine in operant conditioning to address the delayed response time task, which is one of the standard tests for impulsivity in ADHD. In this task, subjects choose between immediate responding for a small reinforcer and later responding for a larger one. We studied the influence on impulsivity of four key parameters of the model: The learning rate, discount factor, brittleness, and action bias.

RESULTS

The behavior of the model is broadly comparable with electrophysiological (monkey) and behavioral (ADHD and normal) data. Variations in any of the parameters can cause impulsivity. All parameters except the discount factor show inverted U-shaped curves for their effects on impulsivity, suggesting, for example, how either hyper- or hypofunctioning of dopamine can cause impulsivity. The model suggests how decision making can be affected by environmental unpredictability, and thus offers an account of one aspect of the natural history of ADHD.

CONCLUSIONS

Some types of ADHD may be caused by specific deficits in reinforcement learning and in the use of learned lessons. Environmental factors can interact with these deficits to delay maturation.

The borderline diagnosis II: biology, genetics, and clinical course

In Part I of this three-part article, consideration of the core features of BPD psychopathology, of comorbidity with Axis I disorders, and of underlying personality trait structure suggested that the borderline diagnosis might be productively studied from the perspective of dimensions of trait expression, in addition to that of the category itself. In Part II, we review the biology, genetics, and clinical course of borderline personality disorder (BPD), continuing to attend to the utility of a focus on fundamental dimensions of psychopathology. Biological approaches to the study of personality can identify individual differences with both genetic and environmental influences. The aspects of personality disorder that are likely to have biologic correlates are those involving regulation of affects, impulse/action patterns, cognitive organization and anxiety/inhibition. For BPD, key psychobiological domains include impulsive aggression, associated with reduced serotonergic activity in the brain, and affective instability, associated with increased responsivity of cholinergic systems. There may be a strong genetic component for the development of BPD, but it seems clear, at least, that there are strong genetic influences on traits that underlie it, such as neuroticism, impulsivity, anxiousness, affective lability, and insecure attachment. The course of BPD suggests a heterogeneous disorder. Predictors of poor prognosis include history of childhood sexual abuse, early age at first psychiatric contact, chronicity of symptoms, affective instability, aggression, substance abuse, and increased comorbidity. For research purposes, at least, biological, genetic, and prognostic studies all continue to suggest the need to supplement categorical diagnoses of BPD with assessments of key underlying personality trait dimensions and with historical and clinical observations apart from those needed to make the borderline diagnosis itself.