Modafinil for narcolepsy

Agonist replacement for stimulant dependence: a review of clinical research

Stimulant use disorders are an unrelenting public health concern worldwide. Agonist replacement therapy is among the most effective strategies for managing substance use disorders including nicotine and opioid dependence. The present paper reviewed clinical data from human laboratory self-administration studies and clinical trials to determine whether agonist replacement therapy is a viable strategy for managing cocaine and/or amphetamine use disorders. The extant literature suggests that agonist replacement therapy may be effective for managing stimulant use disorders, however, the clinical selection of an agonist replacement medication likely needs to be based on the pharmacological mechanism of the medication and the stimulant abused by patients. Specifically, dopamine releasers appear most effective for reducing cocaine use whereas dopamine reuptake inhibitors appear most effective for reducing amphetamine use.

Agonist replacement therapy for cocaine dependence: a translational review

Cocaine use disorders are prevalent throughout the world. Agonist replacement therapy is among the most effective strategies for managing substance use disorders including nicotine and opioid dependence. This paper reviews the translational literature, including preclinical experiments, human laboratory studies and clinical trials, to determine whether agonist-replacement therapy is a viable strategy for managing cocaine dependence. Discussion is limited to transporter blockers (i.e., methylphenidate) and releasers (i.e., amphetamine analogs) that are available for use in humans in the hope of impacting clinical research and practice more quickly. The translational review suggests that agonist-replacement therapy, especially monoamine releasers, may be effective for managing cocaine dependence. Future directions for medications development are also discussed because the viability of agonist-replacement therapy for cocaine dependence may hinge on identifying novel compounds or formulations that have less abuse and diversion potential.

Dopamine D2-receptor-mediated increase in vascular and endothelial NOS activity ameliorates cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage in vitro

INTRODUCTION

Cerebral vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a serious complication resulting in delayed neurological deficit, increased morbidity, mortality, longer hospital stays, and rehabilitation time. It afflicts approximately 35 per 100,000 Americans per year, and there is currently no effective therapy. We present in vitro data suggesting that increasing intrinsic nitric oxide relaxation pathways in vascular smooth muscle via dopaminergic agonism ameliorates cerebral vasospasm after SAH.

METHODS

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) from patients with cerebral vasospasm after SAH (CSF(V)) was used to induce vasospasm in porcine carotid artery in vitro. Dopamine was added to test its ability to reverse spasm, and specific dopamine receptor antagonists were used to determine which receptor mediated the protection. Immunohistochemical techniques confirmed the presence of dopamine receptor subtypes and the involvement of NOS in the mechanism of dopamine protection.

RESULTS

Dopamine receptor 1, 2, and 3 subtypes are all present in porcine carotid artery. Dopamine significantly reversed spasm in vitro (67% relaxation), and this relaxation was prevented by Haloperidol, a D(2)R antagonist (10% relaxation, P < 0.05), but not by D(1) or D(3)-receptor antagonism. Both eNOS and iNOS expression were increased significantly in response to CSF(V) alone, and this was significantly enhanced by addition of dopamine, and blocked by Haloperidol.

CONCLUSION

Cerebral vasospasm is significantly reversed in a functional measure of vasospasm in vitro by dopamine, via a D(2)R-mediated pathway. The increase in NOS protein seen in both the endothelium and vascular smooth muscle in response to CSF(V) is enhanced by dopamine, also in a D(2)R-dependent mechanism.

The orexins/hypocretins and schizophrenia

Advances in molecular biology have led to new peptides and proteins being discovered on a regular basis, including the isolation of a number of neurotransmitter candidates. Rarely, however, do these immediately capture the attention of the scientific community. The isolation and characterization of the orexin/hypocretin peptides a decade ago resulted in a slew of studies that have helped clarified their diverse functions, including prominent roles in arousal and appetitive behavior. A number of recent studies have detailed the role of the orexins/hypocretins in attention and cognition and uncovered an involvement in schizophrenia and the mechanisms of action of antipsychotic drugs (APDs). This issue of Schizophrenia Bulletin presents several articles that review our current understanding and point to future directions for the study of the orexins/hypocretins in schizophrenia and APD actions.

Modafinil in the treatment of excessive daytime sleepiness in children

BACKGROUND

Modafinil is an alerting agent approved for the treatment of narcolepsy in adults. There are no studies examining the long-term effects and safety profile of modafinil in children with excessive daytime somnolence (EDS).

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of modafinil on clinical manifestations of narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia.

METHODS

A systematic chart review was conducted for 13 children (mean age 11.0+/-5.3 years, six males, 10 with narcolepsy and three with idiopathic hypersomnia) receiving modafinil.

RESULTS

The mean modafinil dose was 346+/-119 mg/day, with a mean treatment duration of 15.6+/-7.8 months. For approximately 90% of the children treated, parents reported a favorable response with the reduction in sudden sleep attacks, as documented by sleep-wake diaries. One child failed to improve on 400 mg/day modafinil and was switched to methylphenidate. Two other children showed only partial improvement and required additional stimulant medication to control EDS symptoms. Seven children underwent repeated nocturnal polysomnography and multiple sleep latency tests (MSLT). Compared to baseline MSLT measures (mean sleep latency: 6.6+/-3.7 min), modafinil prolonged mean sleep latency (10.2+/-4.8 min, p=0.02) without significant alteration in nocturnal polysomnographic measures. However, a trend towards REM sleep reduction was noted (16.8+/-5.1%TST vs. 11.8+/-6.2%TST). Exacerbation of seizures and psychotic symptoms was reported with modafinil therapy in two children with preexisting conditions. Hematological and hepatic functions assessed every 3 months remained unaltered.

CONCLUSION

Modafinil has a modest, yet significant effect on EDS in children and appears to be safe and well tolerated.