Twenty-year perspective on blunt traumatic diaphragmatic injury in level 1 trauma centre: Early versus delayed diagnosis injury patterns and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Blunt traumatic diaphragmatic injury (TDI) is typically associated with severe trauma and concomitant injuries. It is a diagnostic challenge in the setting of blunt trauma and can be easily overlooked especially in the acute phase often dominated by concurrent injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients with blunt-TDI identified from a level 1 trauma registry. Variables associated with early versus delayed diagnosis as well as non-survivor and survivor groups were collected to examine factors associated with delayed diagnosis.

RESULTS

A total of 155 patients were included (mean age 46 ± 20, 60.6% male). Diagnosis was made <24 h in 126 (81.3%), and >24 h in 29 (18.7%). Of the delayed diagnosis group, 14 (48%) were diagnosed >7 days. Overall, 27 (21.4%) patients had a diagnostic initial CXR and 64 (50.8%) had a diagnostic initial CT. Fifty-eight (37.4%) patients were diagnosed intraoperatively. Of the delayed diagnosis group, 22 (75.9%) had no initial signs on CXR or CT, 15 (52%) of this group had persistent pleural-effusions/elevated-hemidiaphragm leading to further investigation and diagnosis. No significant difference in survival was observed between early and delayed diagnoses, no clinically significant injury patterns to predict delayed diagnoses were noted.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of TDI is challenging. Without frank signs of herniation of abdominal contents on CXR or CT, the diagnosis is often not made on initial imaging. In patients with the evidence of blunt traumatic injury in the lower-chest/upper-abdomen, a high degree of clinical suspicion should be held and follow-up CXRs/CTs arranged.

Evaluation of Serum Cortisol Levels and Response to Cosyntropin Test in Methadone-treated Opium Addicts

Background

Opium has been used for thousands of years for medical and analgesic purposes, and its misuse has also increased in recent years. Methadone, a synthetic opioid, has been used as an analgesic and to help patients quit opium addiction. However, some evidence suggests that long-term use of opioids can affect the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate the serum cortisol level and response to the cosyntropin stimulation test in opium addicts on methadone treatment.

Methods

The study was conducted in November 2019 at Imam Reza Hospital Rehab Center, Birjand, Iran. Thirty-eight methadone-treated opium addicts participated in the study. A blood sample was initially obtained, then 250 µg intramuscular cosyntropin was injected. After 30 and 60 minutes, two other blood samples were obtained. The data were analyzed using SPSS.

Results

There was a significant difference between serum cortisol levels and the normal value in methadone users (9.46 ± 5.42 vs. 14 µg/dL) (P < 0.001). The mean response to the cosyntropin stimulation test in methadone users was 9.34 ± 8.11 µg/dL. Also, 55% of the participants had adrenal insufficiency.

Conclusions

Serum cortisol levels significantly differed from normal values in methadone-treated patients. Therefore, we recommend measuring serum cortisol levels in methadone-treated patients before major medical procedures to consider the stress doses of corticosteroids.

A review of associated controversies surrounding glucocorticoid use in veterinary emergency and critical care

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature in human and veterinary medicine regarding the indications for, efficacy of, and controversies surrounding glucocorticoid (GC) administration in the emergency and critical care (ECC) setting, and to provide an overview of the most commonly used synthetic GC formulations.

MEDICATIONS

Synthetic GCs vary in GC and mineralocorticoid potency, hypothalamic pituitary axis suppression, duration of action, route of administration, and clinical indication for use. Some of the GC compounds commonly used in human and veterinary ECC include hydrocortisone, prednisone, methylprednisolone, and dexamethasone.

INDICATIONS FOR USE

GCs are used in human and veterinary ECC for a variety of disorders including anaphylaxis, acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome, septic shock, and spinal cord injury. Evidence for morbidity or mortality benefit with administration of GC within these populations exists; however, data are sparse and often conflicting.

ADVERSE EFFECTS AND CONTRAINDICATIONS

Routine use of GC in some conditions such as trauma, hemorrhagic shock, and traumatic brain injury is likely contraindicated. GC use has been associated with hyperglycemia, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, gastrointestinal ulceration, or increased mortality in some populations.

The utility of the corticotropin test to diagnose adrenal insufficiency in critical illness: an update

OBJECTIVE

One of the most common dynamic testing procedures for assessment of adrenocortical function is the standard corticotropin or the cosyntropin test. The aim of this review was to examine the evidence base underlying the corticotropin test in the management of the critically ill patient.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The principle behind the corticotropin test is the demonstration of an inappropriately low cortisol production in response to exogenous ACTH, a situation analogous to physiological stress. The corticotropin test was originally described in nonstressed subjects, and its applicability and interpretation in the setting of critical illness continues to generate controversy. Attempting to determine the prevalence of an abnormal corticotropin test in critical illness is complicated by the use of different end-points and different populations. Moreover, the test result is also influenced by the assay used for measurement of plasma cortisol. Trials assessing the relationship between corticotropin response and severity of stress and organ dysfunction have produced divergent results, which may reflect differences in the methodology and the association being measured. Moreover, controversy exists with respect to the methodology and the interpretation with respect to the following variables: dose of corticotropin, end-points for assessment of total or free cortisol, effect of plasma cortisol variability, adrenal blood flow and its equivalence with other tests of adrenocortical function.

CONCLUSIONS

The corticotropin test is used widely in the evaluation of adrenocortical function in the endocrine clinics. Its role in the critically ill patient is less well established. Several confounding variables exist and to have a 'one-size-fits-all' approach with a single end-point in the face of several methodological and pathophysiological confounders may be flawed and may result in the institution of inappropriate therapy. The current evidence does not support the use of the corticotrophin test in critical illness to assess adrenocortical function and guiding steroid therapy in critical illness.

Increased Total Serum Random Cortisol Levels Predict Mortality in Critically Ill Trauma Patients

Dysfunction in the hypothalamopituitary adrenal axis is thought to exist; however, there continues to be controversy about what level of serum cortisol corresponds to adrenal insufficiency. Few studies have focused on the significance of serum random cortisol in the critically ill trauma patient. Trauma patients with total serum random cortisol levels drawn in the intensive care unit within the first seven days of hospitalization were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome measured was in-hospital mortality. Two hundred forty-two patients were analyzed. Non-survivors had significantly higher mean cortisol levels than survivors (28.7 ± 15.80 mg/dL vs 22.9 ± 12.35 mg/dL, P = 0.01). Patients with cortisol 30 mg/dL or greater were more likely to die with odds ratio of 2.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5 to 5). The odds ratio increased to 4.0 and 3.8 (95% CI, 1.4 to 11.4 and 1.3 to 10.9) when cortisol was drawn on hospital Day 2 and Days 3 through 7, respectively. Among nonsurvivors, patients with an injury severity score less than 25 had significantly higher cortisol levels than patients with an Injury Severity Score 25 or higher (35.3 ± 19.21 mg/dL vs 25.7 ± 13.21 mg/dL, P = 0.009). Patients with massive transfusion, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, or solid organ injury did not have significantly different cortisol levels. The covariate-adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that cortisol level has a 77 per cent accuracy in differentiating survivors from nonsurvivors. Higher cortisol levels were predictive of mortality in critically ill trauma patients. Whether serum cortisol level is a marker that can be modified remains an area of interest for future study.

Adrenal response after trauma is affected by time after trauma and sedative/analgesic drugs

BACKGROUND

The adrenal response in critically ill patients, including trauma victims, has been debated over the last decade. The aim of this study was to assess the early adrenal response after trauma.

METHODS

Prospective, observational study of 50 trauma patients admitted to a level-1-trauma centre. Serum and saliva cortisol were followed from the accident site up to five days after trauma. Corticosteroid binding globulin (CBG), dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and sulphated dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEAS) were obtained twice during the first five days after trauma. The effect of time and associations between cortisol levels and; severity of trauma, infusion of sedative/analgesic drugs, cardiovascular dysfunction and other adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) dependent hormones (DHEA/DHEAS) were studied.

RESULTS

There was a significant decrease over time in serum cortisol both during the initial 24 h, and from the 2nd to the 5th morning after trauma. A significant decrease over time was also observed in calculated free cortisol, DHEA, and DHEAS. No significant association was found between an injury severity score ≥ 16 (severe injury) and a low (< 200 nmol/L) serum cortisol at any time during the study period. The odds for a serum cortisol < 200 nmol/L was eight times higher in patients with continuous infusion of sedative/analgesic drugs compared to patients with no continuous infusion of sedative/analgesic drugs.

CONCLUSION

Total serum cortisol, calculated free cortisol, DHEA and DHEAS decreased significantly over time after trauma. Continuous infusion of sedative/analgesic drugs was independently associated with serum cortisol < 200 nmol/L.

Acute adrenal insufficiency in cervical spinal cord injury

BACKGROUND

Adequate adrenal response is fundamental for the maintenance of physiological homeostasis in the setting of trauma and severe illness. Patients with neurogenic shock are at risk of severe consequences if adrenal insufficiency (AI) is not rapidly identified and treated.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the incidence of AI in patients with acute cervical spinal cord injury and its effect on in-hospital complications.

METHODS

The medical records of patients older than 18 years who were admitted to the adult neurosurgery service at the University District Hospital as the result of neurogenic shock after acute cervical spinal cord injury from January 2004 to December 2009 were reviewed retrospectively.

RESULTS

One hundred ninety-nine patients were admitted with acute cervical spinal cord injury. A total of 37 patients met the pre-established criteria for neurogenic shock. The incidence of AI in patients with neurogenic shock was 22%. The average random cortisol was 9.3 μg/dL in patients with AI versus 29.2 μg/dL in non-AI. The presence of AI was positively correlated with complications and an increase in the risk of intubation (P = 0.01 and P = 0.002). The 30-day mortality rate in patients with AI was 13% compared with the 3% in the non-AI group (P = 0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Adrenal insufficiency is a poorly recognized complication in patients with acute cervical spinal cord injury and its aggressive treatment is of utmost importance to avoid further neurological injury.

Incidence and Outcomes of Critical Illness-Related Corticosteroid Insufficiency in Trauma Patients

The spectrum of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) in trauma is not fully defined. This study describes our trauma experience with hydrocortisone-treated patients experiencing CIRCI. We conducted a 5-year retrospective analysis from a Level II trauma center using biochemical and clinical criteria for adrenal insufficiency. Seventy patients met the inclusion criteria for CIRCI. There was a 34 per cent mortality rate despite therapy. Nonsurvivors were older with larger admission base deficits and experienced higher rates of sepsis, bacteremia, and pneumonia. Nonsurvivors had prolonged vent days (mean 53 ± 64 days) when compared with survivors (mean 30 ± 22 days; P = 0.029). Renal replacement therapy was a strong predictor of mortality. Spinal cord-injured patients had high Injury Severity Scores (mean 34 ± 18), elevated baseline Cortisol levels (mean 56 ± 84 vs 18 ± 14; P = 0.004), and required prolonged duration of steroid therapy (30 ± 52 vs 15 ± 15 days; P = 0.080) when compared with the nonspinal cord-injured group. Our data suggest that CIRCI in trauma is associated with significant mortality and morbidity even when patients are treated appropriately.

Adrenocortical insufficiency in horses and foals

The adrenal cortices produce various steroid hormones that play vital roles in several physiologic processes. Although permanent adrenocortical insufficiency is rare in all species, emerging evidence in both human and equine medicine suggests that transient reversible adrenocortical dysfunction resulting in cortisol insufficiency frequently develops during critical illness. This syndrome is termed relative adrenal insufficiency (RAI) or critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency (CIRCI) and can contribute substantially to morbidity and mortality associated with the primary disease. This review discusses the mechanisms, diagnosis, and clinical consequences of adrenocortical insufficiency, with particular focus on the current understanding of RAI/CIRCI in horses and foals.

Relative adrenal insufficiency in the intensive care population; background and critical appraisal of the evidence

Dysfunction of the hypothalamo-pituitary adrenal axis has become a central feature in descriptions of the pathophysiology of sepsis. However; despite hundreds of published articles including literature reviews and consensus statements, controversy still exists regarding the fundamental nature of the disorder and its relevance to clinical management. Often referred to as 'relative adrenal insufficiency', a recent consensus conference has proposed the alternate term 'critical illness related corticosteroid insufficiency' and suggested diagnostic criteria of a delta serum cortisol of less than 9 microg/l after adrenocorticotrophic hormone administration or a random total cortisol of under 10 microg/l. This review attempts to establish a critical reappraisal of the evidence for the existence of relative adrenal insufficiency/critical illness related corticosteroid insufficiency in patients with sepsis and examines the background, controversies and possibilities for future research into the condition.