The Impact of Area Deprivation Index, Geography, and Mechanism on Incidence of Ballistic Injury to the Upper Extremity

INTRODUCTION

This study investigates the intersection of ballistic injuries, geography, and Area Deprivation Index (ADI). We hypothesized that both ADI and geography are correlated with incidence of upper extremity ballistic injuries. Further, we characterize and compare 2 distinct upper extremity gunshot injury populations presenting to our institution: those sustaining violent ballistic injuries and those who suffer an accidental, self-inflicted injury. Our purpose is to evaluate the impact of geography and ADI on the pattern of upper extremity gunshot injuries in Illinois and Missouri.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective review of adult patients sustaining ballistic injury to the upper extremity at a single urban level I trauma center over 10 years (n = 797). Seven hundred thirty patients had home addresses in Illinois or Missouri; these addresses were geocoded and included for analysis. Mechanism of injury was self-reported. ADI was measured from the 2019 Neighborhood Atlas, in which deprivation increases from 1 to 100. Comparisons between groups were conducted with unpaired t tests, Fisher exact test, or χ2 testing, where appropriate.

RESULTS

Addresses constituted 259 unique census tracts, and the average number of upper extremity gunshot wound incidents per tract was 3, with a maximum of 22; 15.4% of census block tracts made up almost half (48.4%) of the total ballistic injuries in the study period; 97.7% of violent injuries occurred in Urban areas, as compared with only 60% of accidental injuries (P < 0.05). ADI and incidence of upper extremity ballistic injury were positively correlated. ADI varied significantly between patients sustaining violent (median, 94; mean, 86.1) versus accidental self-inflicted (median, 79; mean, 70.9) injuries (P < 0.05). Fifty percent of violent injuries in our data set occurred in block groups from the 2 most deprived quintiles.

CONCLUSIONS

Upper extremity gunshot wounds in general are concentrated in census blocks with high ADI. Violent injuries in particular are more likely to occur in urban areas with high ADI, whereas patients with accidental, self-inflicted injuries are more geographically and socioeconomically diverse. These differing populations require unique approaches to reduce incidence and morbidity.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Infectious Complications in Isolated Gunshot Wounds to the Upper Extremity

BACKGROUND

Prophylactic antibiotics are variably prescribed after isolated upper extremity gunshot wounds (UE GSWs). The risk of infection and factors influencing prescribing practice remain poorly understood, and clinical practice guidelines are lacking.

METHODS

Adults with isolated UE GSWs over a 10-year period were included. Medical records were reviewed for demographic and injury variables, comorbidities, surgical treatments, antibiotic administration, infectious complications, and follow-up duration. Infection rate was calculated. Bivariate and multivariable linear regression analyses were used to identify patient-related and injury-related factors predictive of prophylactic antibiotic prescription.

RESULTS

A total of 281 patients were eligible for inclusion. Prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed at discharge for 111 patients (40%). Multivariable analysis revealed that patients with more distal injuries and ballistic fractures were significantly more likely to receive prophylactic antibiotics. Of patients with at least 30-day postinjury follow-up, 6% developed infections.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic antibiotic administration after UE GSWs was inconsistent but more common in patients with ballistic fractures and injuries in the hand. The overall incidence of infection was found to lie between 3% and 6%. The rate of infection in the antibiotic prophylaxis (2%-6%) group was similar to that in the no-antibiotic (5%-7%) group, suggesting that antibiotic prophylaxis may not have a large impact on infectious risk. However, because this study is nonrandomized, and because this study is underpowered for multivariable modeling of infectious risk, it remains possible that subgroups of this population may still benefit from antibiotic prophylaxis.

Patient and Hospital Characteristics Associated with Admission Among Patients With Minor Isolated Extremity Firearm Injuries: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Objective

To quantify the association between insurance and hospital admission following minor isolated extremity firearm injury.

Background

The association between insurance and injury admission has not been examined.

Methods

This was an observational retrospective cohort study of minor isolated extremity firearm injury captured in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient and Emergency Department Databases in 6 states (New York, Arkansas, Wisconsin, Massachusetts, Florida, and Maryland) from 2016 to 2017 among patients aged 16 years or older. The primary exposure was insurance. Admitted patients were propensity score matched to nonadmitted patients on age, extremity Abbreviated Injury Score, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index with exact matching within hospital to adjust for selection bias. A general estimating equation logistic regression estimated the association between insurance and odds of admission in the matched cohort while controlling for sex, race, injury intent, injury type, hospital profit type, and trauma center designation with observations clustered by propensity score-matched pairs within hospital.

Results

A total of 8151 patients presented to hospital with a minor isolated extremity firearm injury between 2016 and 2017 in 6 states. Patients were 88.0% male, 56.6% Black, and 71.7% aged 16 to 36 years old, and 22.1% were admitted. A total of 2090 patients were matched on propensity for admission. Privately insured matched patients had 1.70 higher adjusted odds of admission and 95% confidence interval of 1.30 to 2.22, compared with uninsured after adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics.

Conclusions

Insurance was associated with hospital admission for minor isolated extremity firearm injury.

A systematic review of hemorrhage and vascular injuries in civilian public mass shootings

BACKGROUND

Civilian public mass shootings (CPMSs) are a major public health issue and in recent years several events have occurred worldwide. The aim of this systematic review was to characterize injuries and mortality after CPMSs focusing on in-hospital management of hemorrhage and vascular injuries.

METHOD

A systematic review of all published literature was undertaken in Medline, Embase and Web of Science January 1st, 1968, to February 22nd, 2021, according to the PRISMA guidelines. Literature was eligible for inclusion if the CPMS included three or more people shot, injured or killed, had vascular injuries or hemorrhage.

RESULTS

The search identified 2884 studies; 34 were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. There were 2039 wounded in 45 CPMS events. The dominating anatomic injury location per event was the extremity followed by abdomen and chest. The median number of operations and operated patients per event was 22 (5-101) and 10.5 (4-138), respectively. A total of 899 deaths were reported with a median mortality rate of 36.1% per event (15.9-71.4%) Thirty-eight percent (13/34) of all studies reported on vascular injuries. Vascular injuries ranged from 8 to 29%; extremity vascular injury the most frequent. Specific vascular injuries included thoracic aorta 18% (42/232), carotid arteries 6% (14/232), and abdominal aorta 5% (12/232). Vascular injuries were involved in 8.3%-10% of all deaths.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review showed an overall high mortality after CPMS with injuries mainly located to the extremities, thorax and abdomen. About one quarter of deaths was related to hemorrhage involving central large vessel injuries. Further understanding of these injuries, and structured and uniform reporting of injuries and treatment protocols may help improve evaluation and management in the future. Level of Evidence Systematic review and meta-analysis, level III.

Mechanism matters: A 10-year experience of ballistic injuries of the upper extremity

INTRODUCTION

Upper Extremity gunshot wounds represent a significant strain on community and hospital resources, and reports of their epidemiology are varied. We hypothesized that demographic and socioeconomic variables would be associated with variable injury patterns and management, and that two distinct populations would be affected by upper extremity ballistic injury based on violent versus accidental, self-inflicted mechanism.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Retrospective review of all adult patients sustaining ballistic injury to the upper extremity at a single urban Level I trauma center over 10 years (n = 797). Demographic, injury pattern, treatment, and outcomes data were collected. Comparisons between groups were conducted with unpaired t-tests and chi-square testing where appropriate.

RESULTS

Most patients were male (89.1%) and mean age was 30.1 years (18-83). Violence accounted for 89.1% of injuries. Black individuals were disproportionately affected at 87% of patients. Shoulder injuries were most common (34%), and wrist least common (7%). Demographics and injury pattern varied significantly between patients sustaining violent injury and those with self-inflicted mechanisms. Patients sustaining violent injury were most often young, Black men more likely to be injured proximally, whereas patients with self-inflicted injuries were more likely to be older, Caucasian men with more comorbidities injured distally. Cumulatively, 35.3% of patients required operative intervention. Distal injuries were more likely operative. The most commonly injured structure across all levels was bone (53%), and 54.3% of fractures required operation. Median follow-up was 24.5 months. Complication rate was 13.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Gunshot wounds of the upper extremity create complex patterns of injury which vary based on level of injury and mechanism. Violent and self-inflicted injuries occur in dissimilar populations and result in distinctive injury patterns.

Gunshot Injuries of the Hand: Incidence, Treatment Characteristics, and Factors Associated With Healthcare Utilization

BACKGROUND

The objectives of this study are to: (1) describe the demographics, injury patterns, and treatment characteristics of patients who sustained a gunshot injury (GSI) of the hand; and (2) examine the utilization of healthcare resources in patients with a GSI of the hand.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 148 adult patients who were treated for a GSI of the hand between January 2000 to December 2017 using multiple International Classification of Diseases Ninth and Tenth Edition (ICD-9 and ICD-10) codes. We used bivariate and multivariable analysis to identify which factors are associated with unplanned reoperation, length of hospitalization, and number of operations.

RESULTS

Multivariable logistic regression showed that fracture severity was associated with unplanned reoperation. Multivariable linear regression showed that fracture severity is associated with a higher number of hand operations after a GSI of the hand, and that a retained bullet (fragment) and patients having gunshot injuries in other regions than the hand had a longer length of hospitalization. Seventy (47%) patients had sensory or motor symptoms in the hand after their GSI, of which 22 (15%) patients had a transection of the nerve.

CONCLUSIONS

Sensory and motor nerve deficits are common after a GSI of the hand. However, only 31% of patients with symptoms had a transection of the nerve. A retained bullet (fragment), having more severe hand fractures, and GSI in other regions than the hand are associated with a higher number of operation and a longer period of hospitalization.

Gunshot-related lower extremity nerve injuries

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe the frequency of nerve injury associated with lower extremity ballistic trauma, the associated skeletal and soft tissue injuries, and the rate of neurologic recovery.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A retrospective review of an institutional trauma database was completed at a single level 1 trauma academic medical center.

PATIENTS

This was an institutional review board approved retrospective cohort study of patients over 16 years of age presenting with ballistic-related traumatic injury to the lower extremities between May 2018 and May 2019. All patients identified with lower extremity ballistic trauma were included in this study. The rate of nerve palsy, associated skeletal injury, and operative fixation were recorded for each anatomic zone. Rates of associated concomitant vascular injury, fracture, and compartment syndrome were collected through a review of the electronic medical records. Chart review was performed to evaluate outcomes and nerve recovery.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients (21 extremities, 21/148, 14%) were diagnosed by attending physicians, fellowship-trained in orthopedic trauma, as having ballistic-related nerve injuries. Seventy-three percent of patients with a documented neurologic injury (11/15) demonstrated complete nerve recovery as measured by the MRC and sensory scale assessment at most recent follow-up, while the rest demonstrated no improvement in their neurologic deficits from presentation. The rate of associated vascular injury in patients with lower extremity nerve palsies was 38% (8/21). While the rate of vascular injury in the absence of neurologic injury was 3% (4/127).

CONCLUSIONS

This series of lower extremity nerve injuries in a large sample of urban lower extremity ballistic trauma noted a high rate of concomitant nerve injuries. An associated diagnosis of a vascular injury appears to portend a higher risk of neurologic injury. Treating surgeons should have a high index of suspicion for associated vascular injury in patients presenting with a ballistic lower extremity nerve palsy.

Gunshot-Related Upper Extremity Nerve Injuries at a Level 1 Trauma Center

PURPOSE

Gunshot wounds can result in a spectrum of injuries to nerves, with little data to guide definitive treatment. We performed a retrospective evaluation of gunshot-related upper extremity injuries in an urban trauma center to analyze epidemiology, associated injuries, and short-term outcomes. We hypothesized that gunshot-related injuries would involve soft tissue cavitation, inducing axonotmesis and neuropraxia rather than neurotmesis injuries.

METHODS

All patients over the age of 16 with upper extremity gunshot trauma from May 2018 to May 2019 were identified through the University of Chicago orthopaedic and general surgery trauma databases. Initial nerve injuries were identified by physical examination. Patient demographic data, soft tissue and skeletal injury, treatment modality, and return of function were collected.

RESULTS

Ballistic injuries in 1302 patients were treated over 12 months. We identified 126 upper extremity gunshot injuries in 117 patients. Thirty-eight upper extremities (38 patients) had a documented nerve deficit (38/126, 30%) with a follow-up rate of 94% (34/36) at a mean of 351 days after injury (median, 202 days; range, 13-929 days). One patient had a subacute transradial amputation, and 1 patient was deceased at final follow-up. The presence of vascular injury and fracture increased the rate of neurologic injury after gunshot injuries. At the most recent follow-up, 68% (23/34) of patients with upper extremity injury had improvement in nerve function as measured by objective clinical assessment, with 24% (8/34) experiencing full recovery at an average of 368 days (median, 261 days; range, 41-929 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Nerve injury after ballistic trauma to the upper extremity is common. Vascular injury and fractures were associated with a higher risk of nerve injury. Short-term improvement in nerve function was seen in over half the cohort, suggesting a predominance of neuropraxic effects.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

Pediatric firearm-associated fractures: Analysis of management and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Firearm-associated injuries (FAIs) are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in children living in the United States. Most victims of such injuries survive, but may experience compromised function related to musculoskeletal injuries. Although complex firearm-associated fractures (FAFs) often require specialized orthopaedic, vascular, and plastic surgical intervention, there is minimal research describing their management and outcomes. The purpose of this study is to describe the epidemiology and presentation of pediatric FAFs, as well as evaluate the management and outcomes of these injuries.

AIM

To describe the epidemiology and presentation of pediatric FAFs, as well as evaluate the management and outcomes of these injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed at a major, pediatric level 1 trauma center. The study included patients aged 18 or younger who presented with FAIs between 2008-2018. Additional data was collected on patients with FAFs including demographic and clinical data such as age, sex, race, payor type, fracture location, injury severity score (ISS), and radiographic and clinical outcomes. The management of FAFs was analyzed as well as need for readmission and reoperation. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the results and univariate analyses were performed to assess differences between groups.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2018, there were a total of 61 patients who presented with FAIs. In this cohort, 21 patients (34%) sustained FAFs (25 fractures) with a mean age of 11 (Range: 10 mo to 18 years old) at the time of presentation. Approximately 52% (n = 11) of patients with FAFs were male, 76% (n = 8 and n = 8, respectively) identified as black or other, and 71% (n = 15) had government insurance. FAFs were most commonly noted in the upper extremity (n = 7) and lower extremity (n = 6). In patients with FAFs, the mean ISS at presentation was 11.38 (Range: 2-38), and 24% of patients (n = 5) were classified as having a major trauma. There were no significant differences in age, sex, race, and payor type in FAF patients that presented with and without major trauma (P > 0.05). When comparing FAF and non-FAF patients, there was a statistically significant difference in ISS (11.38 vs 14.45, P = 0.02). In total, 33% (n = 7) of patients with FAFs required orthopaedic surgical management, which was most commonly comprised of debridement (n = 6/7, 86%), and 14% (n = 1/7) of these patients required coordinated care with plastic and/or vascular surgery. There were no significant differences in age and payor type in patients with FAFs treated with and without orthopaedic surgery. Of the patients with FAFs, 52% (n = 11) had a minimum 90-d follow-up, and 48% (n = 10) had a minimum 2-year follow-up. Two patients were readmitted within 90-d, while one patient required a reoperation within 2-years.

CONCLUSION

Over 25% of FAIs in pediatric patients result in FAFs. FAFs often present to pediatric trauma centers and the majority of these injuries occur in non-Caucasian males with government insurance. Most FAFs do not need orthopaedic surgical management; 14% of these injuries require subspecialty care by orthopaedic surgery, vascular surgery, or plastic surgery. Patients with FAFs also have lower ISS compared to patients who sustained FAIs without fracture. Thus, these patients should be treated at pediatric trauma centers with specialty care and additional research is needed to focus prevention efforts, understand reasons for poor follow-up, and evaluate outcomes after injury.

Epidemiology of Upper Extremity Firearm Injuries among Major Trauma Hospitals in the United States

BACKGROUND

As many as 34 percent of nonfatal firearm injuries involve the upper extremity. Although not lethal, these injuries cause substantial morbidity. The authors conducted an epidemiologic study characterizing upper extremity firearm-related injuries presenting to U.S. trauma centers over a 10-year period.

METHODS

The authors used the National Trauma Databank from 2007 to 2017 to identify isolated upper extremity firearm-related injuries. Descriptive statistics were performed to characterize patient demographic data, firearm type, extremity injury patterns, treatments received, hospital length of stay, and regional variation.

RESULTS

The authors identified 48,254 upper extremity firearm-related injuries. The patients were largely male patients (85 percent), and over half were between the ages of 20 and 39 years. Handguns (34 percent) were the most frequently used firearm. Shoulder and upper arm were the most frequently injured areas (54 percent); however, 18 percent of patients injured two or more areas. Patients were most often treated at university hospitals (59 percent) with Level I or II trauma designation. Seventy percent were admitted and/or taken directly to the operating room. The mean hospital length of stay was 3 days. Payer mix among these patients was variable: Medicaid, 20 percent; private insurance, 20 percent; and self-pay, 29 percent.

CONCLUSIONS

Upper-extremity firearm injuries are resource intensive, with three-quarters of patients requiring operative intervention and/or hospitalization. Level I and II trauma centers were the site of care for the majority of patients. Targeted gun policy reform and prevention measures directed toward at-risk groups have the potential to limit the unnecessary morbidity and costs associated with these injuries.

Epidemiology of firearm injuries in Sweden

BACKGROUND

Gun violence is a global health problem. Population-based research on firearm-related injuries has been relatively limited considering the burden of disease. The aim of this study was to analyze nationwide epidemiological trends of firearm injuries.

METHODS

This is a retrospective nationwide epidemiological study including all patients with firearm injuries from the Swedish Trauma Registry (SweTrau) during the period 2011 and 2019. Registry data were merged with data from the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention and the Swedish Police Authority.

RESULTS

There were 1010 patients admitted with firearm injuries, 96.6% men and 3.4% women, median age 26.0 years [IQR 22.0-36.3]. The overall number of firearm injuries increased on a yearly basis (P < 0.001). The most common anatomical injury location was lower extremity (29.7%) followed by upper extremity (13.8%), abdomen (13.8%), and chest (12.5%). The head was the most severely injured body region with a median abbreviated injury scale (AIS) of 5 [IQR 3.2-5]. Vascular injuries were mainly located to the lower extremity (42%; 74/175). Majority of patients (51.3%) had more than one anatomic injury location. The median hospital length of stay was 3 days [IQR 2-8]. 154 patients (15.2%) died within 24 h of admission. The 30-day and 90-day mortality was 16.7% (169/1010) and 17.5% (177/1010), respectively. There was an association between 24-h mortality and emergency department systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg [OR 30.3, 95% CI 16.1-56.9] as well as the following injuries with AIS ≥ 3; head [OR 11.8, 95% CI 7.5-18.5], chest [OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.1], and upper extremity [OR 3.6, CI 1.3-10.1].

CONCLUSIONS

This nationwide study shows an annual increase of firearm-related injuries and fatalities. Firearm injuries affect people of all ages but more frequently young males in major cities. One in six patients succumbed from their injuries within 30 days with most deaths occurring within 24 h of hospital admission. Given the impact of firearm-related injuries on society additional research on a national level is critical.

Epidemiology and characteristics of firearm injuries in a French level I trauma centre, 2009-2019

BACKGROUND

Firearm injuries (FI) are an increasing problem in Europe but there have been few European epidemiological studies on civilian FI, particularly in France. This study investigated the epidemiology of FI at a French level I trauma centre.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of all patients admitted to our centre with an FI between January 2009 and December 2019. We investigated the epidemiological trends of FI during the study period, and characterised the FI.

RESULTS

A total of 162 patients were victims of FI. Prevalence was 0.11% and the mean annual incidence was 10.4 per 100 000 habs. A significant increase has been observed over the last 10 years, from 5 cases in 2009 (3.1%) to 30 in 2019 (18.5%). Of the 162 victims, 85 (52.5%) died as a direct result of the FI: 72 suicides (88.9%) and 9 victims of urban violence (11.1%) (armed public environment disorder). 95.3% of the patients died before reaching at the hospital. There were 95 cases (58.7%) of suicide and 33 cases (20.4%) of urban violence. The head was shot in 87 cases (48.9%), the thorax in 32 cases (18.5%) and the lower limbs in 24 cases (13.5%). A total of 106 surgeries were performed on 54 patients (33.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

We identified 162 cases of FI with a mean annual incidence of 10.4 per 100 000 habs. A significant increase in FI was observed over the last 10 years. 52.2% of patients died, and the main context was suicide or attempted suicide.

Gunshot Wounds to the Upper Extremity

Upper extremity gunshot wounds result in notable morbidity for the orthopaedic trauma patient. Critical neurovascular structures are particularly at risk. The fractures are often comminuted and may be associated with a variable degree of soft-tissue injury. The literature lacks consensus regarding antibiotic selection and duration, and indications for surgical débridement. Bullets and/or bullet fragments should be removed in cases of plumbism, intra-articular location, nerve impingement, location within a vessel, and location in a subcutaneous position within the hand and/or wrist. Gunshot fractures generally do not follow common fracture patterns seen in blunt injuries, and the complexity of certain gunshot fractures can often be a challenge for the treating orthopaedic surgeon. Common plate and screw constructs may not adequately stabilize these injuries, and innovative fixation techniques may be required. The treatment for bone defects varies by location and severity of injury, and typically requires staged treatment. Nerve injuries after gunshot wounds are common, but spontaneous nerve recovery is expected in most cases.

Epidemiology of firearm injuries in a Scandinavian trauma center

Background

There is a concern that civilian gunshot injuries in Europe are increasing but there is a lack of contemporary studies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the current epidemiology and outcome of firearm injuries.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of all patients (n = 235) treated for firearm injuries admitted to a Scandinavian trauma center between 2005 and 2016. Local and national trauma registries were used for data collection.

Results

Mean age was 31.3 years (SD ± 12.9; range 16–88 years); 93.6% males; mean ISS was 14.3 (SD ± 15.9); 31.9% (75/235) had ISS > 15. There was a significant increase in penetrating trauma (P < 0.001) and firearm injuries (P < 0.001) over the years. The most common anatomical location of firearm injury was the lower extremity, (n = 138/235; 38%), followed by the abdomen (n = 69;19%), upper extremity (n = 53;15%), chest (n = 50; 14%), and head and neck (n = 50; 14%). Ninety patients (38.3%) had more than one anatomic injury location. There were in total 360 firearm injuries and 168 major surgical procedures were performed. 53% (n = 125) of patients underwent at least one surgical procedure. The most common procedures were fracture surgery 42% (n = 70/168), followed by laparotomy 30%% (n = 51), chest tube 17% (n = 29), and thoracotomy 11% (n = 18). Forty-one patients (17%) had at least one major vascular injury (n = 54). The most common vascular injury was lower extremity vessel injuries, 26/54 (48%), followed by vessels in chest and abdomen. There was a significant increase in vascular injuries during the study period (P < 0.006). The 30-day mortality was 12.8% (n = 30); 24 patients died within 24 h mainly due to injuries to the chest and the head and neck region.

Conclusions

Firearm injuries cause significant morbidity and mortality and are an important medical and public health problem. In a Scandinavian trauma center there has been an increase of firearm injuries in recent years. The lower extremities followed by the abdomen are the dominating injured regions and there has been an increase in associated vascular injuries.

Gunshot Injuries to the Extremity: Is Immediate General Surgery Presence Needed?

Gunshot wounds (GSW) are becoming increasingly prevalent in urban settings. GSW to the trunk mandate full trauma activation and immediate surgeon response because of the high likelihood of operative intervention. Extremity GSW proximal to the knee/elbow also require full trauma activation based on American College of Surgeons Committee on trauma standards. However, whether isolated extremity GSW require frequent operative intervention is unclear. We evaluated GSW at our Level I trauma center from January 2012 to December 2016. Demographic data and injury patterns were abstracted from the trauma registry and charts. The number of GSW increased yearly but the age, gender, Injury Severity Score and injury pattern did not change (P = ns, not shown). There were 504 GSW that included an extremity and 194 (38%) involved multiple body regions. There were 310 GSW (62%) isolated to an extremity and 176 were proximal to the elbow/knee. If proximal GSW had an Emergency Department systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg, 53 per cent underwent vascular repair, 12 per cent had soft tissue repair, and 29 per cent required no operation. If proximal GSW had an Emergency Department blood pressure >90 mm Hg, 57 per cent underwent orthopedic repair, 22 per cent required no surgery, and only 13 per cent required vascular repair (P < 0.01). In the absence of other criteria for full trauma activation such as shock, the need for the immediate presence of a general surgeon to perform emergency surgery for a GSW isolated to the extremity is low.

Predictors of Nerve Injury After Gunshot Wounds to the Upper Extremity

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to examine the incidence of nerve injury, clinical variables associated with nerve palsy, and predictive factors of nerve laceration after gunshot wounds to the upper extremity.

METHODS

Forty-one patients from a level I trauma center with gunshot wounds to the upper extremity who underwent surgical exploration between 2007 and 2014 were identified retrospectively. Patients with proximal ipsilateral injuries, inadequate documentation, imaging, or with a pre-existing neurologic deficit were excluded. Patient demographics, clinical sensory and motor examination, the presence of retained bullet fragments, fracture, vascular injury, and compartment syndrome were recorded. Univariate analysis was performed to determine significant predictors of intraoperative nerve laceration. Significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine nerves were explored in 41 patients. There were higher frequencies of fractures, retained fragments, vascular injury, and compartment syndrome in patients with nerve palsies, although none were associated with nerve laceration. Patients with palsies on presentation were significantly more likely to have a nerve laceration found intraoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Gunshot wounds to the upper extremity with focal nerve deficits remain a difficult problem for orthopedic surgeons. The present study provides evidence that may help guide operative decision making in treatment of these injuries.

CT-detected traumatic small artery extremity injuries: surgery, embolize, or watch? A 10-year experience

Advances in computed tomography (CT) angiography have increased the sensitivity and specificity of detecting small branch arterial injuries in the extremities of trauma patients. However, it is unclear whether these patients should undergo surgery, angioembolization, or conservative watchful waiting. We hypothesized that uncomplicated small arterial branch injuries can be managed successfully with watchful waiting. A 10-year retrospective review of extremity CT angiograms with search findings of arterial "active extravasation" or "pseudoaneurysm" was performed at a level 1 county trauma center. Subgroup analysis was performed on those with isolated extremity injury and those with concurrent injuries. A total of 31 patients had CT-detected active extravasation (84 %) or pseudoaneurysm (16 %), 71 % of which were isolated vascular injuries. Of the patients evaluated, 71 % (n = 22) were managed with watchful waiting, 19 % (n = 6) with angioembolization, and 10 % (n = 3) with surgery. Watchful waiting complications included progression to alternative treatment (n = 1) and blood transfusions (n = 2). Complications of surgery included the inability to find active bleeding (n = 1) and postoperative psychosis (n = 1). Complications of angioembolization were limited to a postprocedure blood transfusion (n = 1). Patients with isolated vascular injuries had an average length of stay of 2.9 days, with management averages of the following: 2.7 days with watchful waiting (n = 16), 3.3 days with angioembolization (n = 3), and 3.7 days with surgery (n = 3). CT angiography has greatly increased the reported incidence of traumatic arterial injury in the extremity. We propose that small branch arterial injuries in the extremities can be managed successfully with watchful waiting and do not often require immediate embolization.