1
|
van Helsdingen CP, van Wijlick JG, de Vries R, Bouvy ND, Leeflang MM, Hemke R, Derikx JP. Association of computed tomography-derived body composition and complications after colorectal cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2024; 15:2234-2269. [PMID: 39370740 PMCID: PMC11634520 DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 10/08/2024] Open
Abstract
The prediction of the risk of developing complications after colorectal surgery for colorectal carcinoma remains imprecise. Body composition measurements on a computed tomography (CT) scan can potentially contribute to a better preoperative risk assessment. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the evidence for the use of body composition measurements on CT scans to predict short-term complications after colorectal cancer surgery. A literature search (in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science) was performed up to 1 August 2022. Two researchers independently screened the articles, extracted data and assessed the quality of the studies using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of complications within 30 days after surgery. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model to synthesize a pooled odds ratio (OR). The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021281010). Forty-five articles with a total of 16 537 patients were included. In total, 26 body composition measures were investigated: 8 muscle-related measures, 11 adipose tissue measures, 4 combined muscle and adipose tissue measures, and 3 other measures. These were investigated as potential predictors for more than 50 differently defined postoperative complications. Meta-analysis was only possible for two measurements and showed that higher amounts of visceral fat increase the risk of developing overall complications (OR: 2.52 [1.58-4.00], P < 0.0001) and anastomotic leakage (OR: 1.76 [1.17-2.65], P = 0.006). A wide variety of body composition measurements on preoperative CT scans have been investigated as a predictive factor for postoperative complications. Visceral fat appeared to be associated with overall complications and anastomotic leakage; however, the association is weak, and its clinical relevance or applicability is questionable. The current evidence is limited by methodological heterogeneity and the risk of bias. To improve comparability of results across studies and improve decision-making, future studies should use standardized methods for measuring body composition on CT scans, outcome definitions and statistical analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire P.M. van Helsdingen
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Emma Children's HospitalAmsterdam UMC, location University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Tytgat Institute for Liver and Intestinal ResearchAmsterdam UMC, location University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology MetabolismAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Job G.A. van Wijlick
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Emma Children's HospitalAmsterdam UMC, location University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Ralph de Vries
- Medical LibraryVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Nicole D. Bouvy
- Department of SurgeryMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtThe Netherlands
- NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in MetabolismMaastricht University Medical CenterMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Mariska M.G. Leeflang
- Department of Epidemiology and Data ScienceAmsterdam UMC, location University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Robert Hemke
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear MedicineAmsterdam UMC, location University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Joep P.M. Derikx
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Emma Children's HospitalAmsterdam UMC, location University of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology MetabolismAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Knoedler S, Schliermann R, Knoedler L, Wu M, Hansen FJ, Matar DY, Obed D, Vervoort D, Haug V, Hundeshagen G, Paik A, Kauke-Navarro M, Kneser U, Pomahac B, Orgill DP, Panayi AC. Impact of sarcopenia on outcomes in surgical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2023; 109:4238-4262. [PMID: 37696253 PMCID: PMC10720826 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgeons have historically used age as a preoperative predictor of postoperative outcomes. Sarcopenia, the loss of skeletal muscle mass due to disease or biological age, has been proposed as a more accurate risk predictor. The prognostic value of sarcopenia assessment in surgical patients remains poorly understood. Therefore, the authors aimed to synthesize the available literature and investigate the impact of sarcopenia on perioperative and postoperative outcomes across all surgical specialties. METHODS The authors systematically assessed the prognostic value of sarcopenia on postoperative outcomes by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, searching the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from inception to 1st October 2022. Their primary outcomes were complication occurrence, mortality, length of operation and hospital stay, discharge to home, and postdischarge survival rate at 1, 3, and 5 years. Subgroup analysis was performed by stratifying complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. Sensitivity analysis was performed by focusing on studies with an oncological, cardiovascular, emergency, or transplant surgery population and on those of higher quality or prospective study design. RESULTS A total of 294 studies comprising 97 643 patients, of which 33 070 had sarcopenia, were included in our analysis. Sarcopenia was associated with significantly poorer postoperative outcomes, including greater mortality, complication occurrence, length of hospital stay, and lower rates of discharge to home (all P <0.00001). A significantly lower survival rate in patients with sarcopenia was noted at 1, 3, and 5 years (all P <0.00001) after surgery. Subgroup analysis confirmed higher rates of complications and mortality in oncological (both P <0.00001), cardiovascular (both P <0.00001), and emergency ( P =0.03 and P =0.04, respectively) patients with sarcopenia. In the transplant surgery cohort, mortality was significantly higher in patients with sarcopenia ( P <0.00001). Among all patients undergoing surgery for inflammatory bowel disease, the frequency of complications was significantly increased among sarcopenic patients ( P =0.007). Sensitivity analysis based on higher quality studies and prospective studies showed that sarcopenia remained a significant predictor of mortality and complication occurrence (all P <0.00001). CONCLUSION Sarcopenia is a significant predictor of poorer outcomes in surgical patients. Preoperative assessment of sarcopenia can help surgeons identify patients at risk, critically balance eligibility, and refine perioperative management. Large-scale studies are required to further validate the importance of sarcopenia as a prognostic indicator of perioperative risk, especially in surgical subspecialties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Knoedler
- Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Rainer Schliermann
- Faculty of Social and Health Care Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Regensburg, Regensburg
| | - Leonard Knoedler
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Mengfan Wu
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China
| | - Frederik J. Hansen
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen, Erlangen
| | - Dany Y. Matar
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Doha Obed
- Department of Plastic, Aesthetic, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Dominique Vervoort
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Valentin Haug
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Gabriel Hundeshagen
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Angie Paik
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Martin Kauke-Navarro
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Ulrich Kneser
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Bohdan Pomahac
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, USA
| | - Dennis P. Orgill
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Adriana C. Panayi
- Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Center, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigshafen, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Edmundson PM, Balogh R, Shelley JK, Shirvani A, Shah AH, Caero J, Thomas E, Reynolds M, McShan EE, Bennett MM, Warren AM, Foreman ML. Utilizing psoas muscle cross-sectional area to predict functional outcome. Proc AMIA Symp 2023; 36:468-472. [PMID: 37334081 PMCID: PMC10269380 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2023.2207724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2019] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This study evaluated psoas muscle area (PMA) as a predictor of frailty and functional outcome in trauma patients. Methods The cohort included 211 trauma patients admitted to an urban level I trauma center from March 2012 to May 2014 who consented to participate in a longitudinal study and underwent abdominal-pelvic computed tomography scans during their initial evaluation. Physical component scores (PCS) of the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey were administered to assess physical functionality at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months after injury. PMA in mm2 and Hounsfield units was calculated using the Centricity PACS system. Statistical models were stratified by injury severity score (ISS), <15 or ≥15, and adjusted for age, sex, and baseline PCS. Follow-up PCS were analyzed using general linear regression models. Results For participants with an ISS <15, increased PMA was significantly associated with higher PCS at 3 (P = 0.008), 6 (P = 0.02), and 12 months (P = 0.002), although this relationship was not statistically significant for ISS ≥15 (P = 0.85, 0.66, 0.61). Conclusion For mild to moderately injured (but not seriously injured) patients, those with larger psoas muscles experience better functional outcomes after injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ryan Balogh
- Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shakhbazov R, Pattarabanjird O, Brayman KL, Alekberzade AV, Krylov NN. [Morphometry of adipose tissue for prediction of the outcomes of total pancreatectomy with pancreatic islets autotransplantation in patients with chronic pancreatitis]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2020:12-19. [PMID: 32500684 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia202005112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare different clinical and morphometric features of patients undergoing TPAIT for prediction of postoperative outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective review enrolled patients who underwent TPAIT for the period from January 2007 to October 2017. Morphometric parameters were analyzed using preoperative CT scans and patients were grouped to examine association of these characteristics with postoperative morbidity. Sarcopenia was defined as the presence of a TPA in the lowest sex-specific quartile. The impact of sarcopenia on pancreatic islet features, perioperative blood transfusion, ICU- and hospital-stay, complications, repeated admission within 90 days and islet function was assessed. RESULTS A total of 34 patients were included in this study (12 males and 24 females). At the time of diagnosis, mean age of patients was 43.1 years. Mean body mass index (BMI) in sarcopenic patients was 24.9 kg/m2, mean BMI in those without sarcopenia - 24.8 kg/m2 (p=1.00). Various surgical complications were observed in 11 patients (32.3%). Patients with sarcopenia experienced more complications (83.3%) compared with patients without sarcopenia (50%). However, differences were not significant (p=0.31). Islet characteristics (islet numbers, purity), readmission, ICU- and hospital-stay, incidence of blood transfusion and islet function were also similar in both groups. CONCLUSION Sarcopenia is not a predictor of postoperative complications and islet cell function in chronic pancreatitis patients following TPAIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - K L Brayman
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - A V Alekberzade
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - N N Krylov
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The impact of sarcopenia on patients undergoing treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. JOURNAL OF PANCREATOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1097/jp9.0000000000000046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
6
|
Latorre Fragua RA, Manuel Vázquez A, Ramiro Pérez C, de la Plaza Llamas R, Ramia Ángel JM. Influence of sarcopenia in major pancreatic surgery. A systematic review of the literature. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2020; 43:142-154. [PMID: 32089375 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2020.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Revised: 11/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Post-operative morbidity of pancreatectomies occurs in up to 40-50% of patients, even in modern series. There is a need to find a simple scale in order to identify patients with increased risk of developing major post-operative complications after pancreatic resections. Many studies have been published on sarcopenia and surgical outcomes. Aspects of sarcopenia are presented, along with a systematic review using PRISMA guidelines, in order to search for articles about sarcopenia and pancreatic surgery. The impact of sarcopenia on morbidity and mortality in pancreatic resections is still unclear. The studies presented have been carried out over long periods of time, and many of them compare patients with different diseases. There are also different definitions of sarcopenia, and this can influence the results, as some of the reviewed articles have already shown. It is necessary to unify criteria, both in the definition and in the cut-off values. Prospective studies and consensus on sarcopenia diagnosis should be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raquel Aranzazu Latorre Fragua
- General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Guadalajara, Calle Donante de Sangre s/n, 19002 Guadalajara, Spain.
| | - Alba Manuel Vázquez
- General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Guadalajara, Calle Donante de Sangre s/n, 19002 Guadalajara, Spain
| | - Carmen Ramiro Pérez
- General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Guadalajara, Calle Donante de Sangre s/n, 19002 Guadalajara, Spain
| | - Roberto de la Plaza Llamas
- General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Guadalajara, Calle Donante de Sangre s/n, 19002 Guadalajara, Spain
| | - José Manuel Ramia Ángel
- General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital of Guadalajara, Calle Donante de Sangre s/n, 19002 Guadalajara, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gianotti L, Sandini M. The 2019 ESPEN Arvid Wretlind lecture perioperative nutritional and metabolic care: Patient-tailored or organ-specific approach? Clin Nutr 2019; 39:2347-2357. [PMID: 31732291 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.10.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2019] [Revised: 10/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIM The perioperative severe changes in the nutritional and metabolic homeostasis are, by some means, proportional to the extent of tissue injury and magnitude of operative trauma. An adequate qualitative and quantitative replacement of nutritional substrates are of utmost importance to facilitate proper tissue healing and recovery and maintenance of organ function after surgery. METHODS The present manuscript has been planned to put the most recent research of the Milano-Bicocca University surgical working group in the context of a more personalized nutritional therapy and metabolic care for surgical patients. Particular prominence has been given to major pancreatic resections because these surgeries are among the most complex and challenging operations for the degree of parenchyma resection and tissue dissection, the consequent overall injury, and the fairly high rate of major complications resulting in a catabolic response. RESULTS Anthropometric parameters and particularly sarcopenia, visceral obesity - and their relative proportion -, are strongly associated with poor outcome after pancreatic surgery. Adequate perioperative nutritional therapy is of utmost importance in affecting morbidity. Long-term nutritional and metabolic sequelae, caused by exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, need to be promptly recognized and treated with an adequate enzyme supplementation. CONCLUSIONS There is strong evidence sustaining the necessity of proper perioperative metabolic and nutritional care into the management of patients undergoing major pancreatic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Gianotti
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca and Department of Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
| | - Marta Sandini
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Park J, Gil JR, Shin Y, Won SE, Huh J, You MW, Park HJ, Sung YS, Kim KW. Reliable and robust method for abdominal muscle mass quantification using CT/MRI: An explorative study in healthy subjects. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0222042. [PMID: 31536542 PMCID: PMC6752777 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Quantification of abdominal muscle mass by cross-sectional imaging has been increasingly used to diagnose sarcopenia; however, the technical method for quantification has not been standardized yet. We aimed to determine an optimal method to measure the abdominal muscle area. Methods Among 50 consecutive subjects who underwent abdominal CT and MRI for possible liver donation, total abdominal muscle area (TAMA) and total psoas muscle area (TPA) at the L3 inferior endplate level were measured by two blinded readers. Inter-scan agreement between CT and MRI and inter-reader agreement between the two readers were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and within-subject coefficient of variation (WSCV). To evaluate the effect of measurement level, one reader measured TAMA and TPA at six levels from the L2 to L4 vertebral bodies. Results TAMA was a more reliable biomarker than TPA in terms of inter-scan agreement (ICC: 0.928 vs. 0.788 for reader 1 and 0.853 vs. 0.821 for reader 2, respectively; WSCV: 8.3% vs. 23.4% for reader 1 and 10.4% vs. 22.3% for reader 2, respectively) and inter-reader agreement (ICC: 0.986 vs. 0.886 for CT and 0.865 vs. 0.669 for MRI, respectively; WSCV: 8.2% vs. 16.0% for CT and 11.6% vs. 29.7% for MRI, respectively). In terms of the measurement level, TAMA did not differ from the L2inf to L4inf levels, whereas TPA increased with a decrease in measurement level. Conclusions TAMA is a better biomarker than TPA in terms of inter-scan and inter-reader agreement and robustness to the measurement level. CT was a more reliable imaging modality than MRI. Our results support the use of TAMA measured by CT as a standard biomarker for abdominal muscle area measurement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jisuk Park
- Department of Radiology, Asan Image Metrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jea Ryung Gil
- Department of Radiology, Asan Image Metrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiology, VHS Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Youngbin Shin
- Department of Radiology, Asan Image Metrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Eun Won
- Department of Radiology, Asan Image Metrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jimi Huh
- Department of Radiology, Asan Image Metrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Korea
| | - Myung-Won You
- Department of Radiology, Asan Image Metrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo Jung Park
- Department of Radiology, Asan Image Metrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yu Sub Sung
- Department of Radiology, Asan Image Metrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- * E-mail: (KWK); (YSS)
| | - Kyung Won Kim
- Department of Radiology, Asan Image Metrics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Asan Medical Institute of Convergence Science and Technology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- * E-mail: (KWK); (YSS)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ratnayake CB, Loveday BP, Shrikhande SV, Windsor JA, Pandanaboyana S. Impact of preoperative sarcopenia on postoperative outcomes following pancreatic resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreatology 2018; 18:996-1004. [PMID: 30287167 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2018.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2018] [Revised: 09/21/2018] [Accepted: 09/26/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Morphometric analysis of sarcopenia has garnered interest due to its putative role in predicting outcomes following surgery for a variety of pathologies, including resection for pancreatic disease. However, there are no standard recommendations on whether sarcopenia is a clinically relevant predictor of outcomes in this setting. The aim of this study was to review the prognostic impact of preoperatively diagnosed sarcopenia on postoperative outcomes following pancreatic resection. METHODS A systematic review of published literature was performed using PRISMA guidelines, and included a search of PubMed, MEDLINE and SCOPUS databases until May 2018. RESULTS Thirteen studies, including 3608 patients, were included. There was a significant increase in the mean duration of post-operative hospital stay (mean difference of 0.73 days, CI: 0.06-1.40, P = 0.033), there was no difference in the postoperative outcomes, including: clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, post-operative bile leak, surgical site infection, significant morbidity and overall morbidity. CONCLUSION Preoperative sarcopenia is associated with prolonged hospital stay after pancreatic surgery. However, sarcopenia does not appear to be a significant negative predictive factor in postoperative morbidity although study heterogeneity and risk of bias limit the strength of these conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chathura Bb Ratnayake
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Benjamin Pt Loveday
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; HPB Unit, Department of General Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - John A Windsor
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; HPB Unit, Department of General Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sanjay Pandanaboyana
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; HPB Unit, Department of General Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Francomacaro LM, Walker C, Jaap K, Dove J, Hunsinger M, Widom K, Torres D, Shabahang M, Blansfield J, Wild J. Sarcopenia predicts poor outcomes in urgent exploratory laparotomy. Am J Surg 2018; 216:1107-1113. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.10.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2017] [Revised: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
11
|
Khalili M, Morano WF, Marconcini L, Shaikh MF, Gleeson EM, Styler M, Zebrower M, Bowne WB. Multidisciplinary strategies in bloodless medicine and surgery for patients undergoing pancreatectomy. J Surg Res 2018; 229:208-215. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Revised: 03/20/2018] [Accepted: 04/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
12
|
Gianotti L, Besselink MG, Sandini M, Hackert T, Conlon K, Gerritsen A, Griffin O, Fingerhut A, Probst P, Abu Hilal M, Marchegiani G, Nappo G, Zerbi A, Amodio A, Perinel J, Adham M, Raimondo M, Asbun HJ, Sato A, Takaori K, Shrikhande SV, Del Chiaro M, Bockhorn M, Izbicki JR, Dervenis C, Charnley RM, Martignoni ME, Friess H, de Pretis N, Radenkovic D, Montorsi M, Sarr MG, Vollmer CM, Frulloni L, Büchler MW, Bassi C. Nutritional support and therapy in pancreatic surgery: A position paper of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2018; 164:1035-1048. [PMID: 30029989 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 145] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2018] [Revised: 05/28/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal nutritional therapy in the field of pancreatic surgery is still debated. METHODS An international panel of recognized pancreatic surgeons and pancreatologists decided that the topic of nutritional support was of importance in pancreatic surgery. Thus, they reviewed the best contemporary literature and worked to develop a position paper to provide evidence supporting the integration of appropriate nutritional support into the overall management of patients undergoing pancreatic resection. Strength of recommendation and quality of evidence were based on the approach of the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation Working Group. RESULTS The measurement of nutritional status should be part of routine preoperative assessment because malnutrition is a recognized risk factor for surgery-related complications. In addition to patient's weight loss and body mass index, measurement of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity should be considered in the preoperative evaluation because they are strong predictors of poor short-term and long-term outcomes. The available data do not show any definitive nutritional advantages for one specific type of gastrointestinal reconstruction technique after pancreatoduodenectomy over the others. Postoperative early resumption of oral intake is safe and should be encouraged within enhanced recovery protocols, but in the case of severe postoperative complications or poor tolerance of oral food after the operation, supplementary artificial nutrition should be started at once. At present, there is not enough evidence to show the benefit of avoiding oral intake in clinically stable patients who are complicated by a clinically irrelevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (a so-called biochemical leak), while special caution should be given to feeding patients with clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula orally. When an artificial nutritional support is needed, enteral nutrition is preferred whenever possible over parenteral nutrition. After the operation, regardless of the type of pancreatic resection or technique of reconstruction, patients should be monitored carefully to assess for the presence of endocrine and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Although fecal elastase-1 is the most readily available clinical test for detection of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, its sensitivity and specificity are low. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy should be initiated routinely after pancreatoduodenectomy and in patients with locally advanced disease and continued for at least 6 months after surgery, because untreated pancreatic exocrine insufficiency may result in severe nutritional derangement. CONCLUSION The importance of this position paper is the consensus reached on the topic. Concentrating on nutritional support and therapy is of utmost value in pancreatic surgery for both short- and long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Gianotti
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, and Department of Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marta Sandini
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, and Department of Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kevin Conlon
- Department of Surgery, Trinity College Dublin, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Arja Gerritsen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Oonagh Griffin
- Department of Surgery, Trinity College Dublin, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Abe Fingerhut
- University of Graz Hospital, Surgical Research Unit, Graz, Austria
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Gennaro Nappo
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas University, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas University, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Amodio
- Unit of Gastroenterology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Julie Perinel
- Department of Digestive Surgery, E. Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon-Sud Faculty of Medicine, Lyon, France
| | - Mustapha Adham
- Department of Digestive Surgery, E. Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon-Sud Faculty of Medicine, Lyon, France
| | - Massimo Raimondo
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Horacio J Asbun
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Asahi Sato
- Division of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kyoichi Takaori
- Division of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit - Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC) - Karolinska Institutet at Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maximilian Bockhorn
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic-Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jakob R Izbicki
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic-Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christos Dervenis
- University of Cyprus and Department of Surgical Oncology and HPB Surgery Metropolitan Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Richard M Charnley
- Department of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Marc E Martignoni
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität, München, Germany
| | - Helmut Friess
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität, München, Germany
| | | | - Dejan Radenkovic
- Clinic for Digestive Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia and School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Marco Montorsi
- Department of Surgery, Humanitas University, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Michael G Sarr
- Department of Gastroenterologic and General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Charles M Vollmer
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Luca Frulloni
- Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudio Bassi
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cloyd JM, Nogueras-González GM, Prakash LR, Petzel MQB, Parker NH, Ngo-Huang AT, Fogelman D, Denbo JW, Garg N, Kim MP, Lee JE, Tzeng CWD, Fleming JB, Katz MHG. Anthropometric Changes in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Undergoing Preoperative Therapy and Pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2018; 22:703-712. [PMID: 29230694 PMCID: PMC6022283 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3618-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2017] [Accepted: 10/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The changes in body composition that occur in response to therapy for localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and during the early survivorship period, as well as their clinical significance, are poorly understood. METHODS One hundred twenty-seven consecutive patients with PDAC who received preoperative therapy followed by pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) at a single institution between 2009 and 2012 were longitudinally evaluated. Changes in skeletal muscle (SKM), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) were measured on serial computed tomography images obtained upon presentation, prior to pancreatectomy, and approximately 3 and 12 months after surgery. RESULTS Prior to therapy, patients' mean baseline BMI was 26.5 ± 4.7 kg/m2 and 63.0% met radiographic criteria for sarcopenia. During a mean 5.4 ± 2.3 months of preoperative therapy, minimal changes in SKM (- 0.5 ± 7.8%, p > 0.05), VAT (- 1.8 ± 62.6%, p < 0.001), and SAT (- 4.8 ± 27.7%, p < 0.001) were observed. In contrast, clinically significant changes were observed on postoperative CT compared to baseline anthropometry: SKM - 4.1 ± 10.7%, VAT - 38.7 ± 30.2%, and SAT - 24.1 ± 22.6% (all p < 0.001) and these changes persisted at one year following PD. While anthropometric changes during preoperative therapy were not independently associated with survival, SKM gain between the postoperative period and one-year follow-up was associated with improved overall survival (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.87). CONCLUSIONS In contrast to the minor changes that occur during preoperative therapy for PDAC, significant losses in key anthropometric parameters tend to occur over the first year following PD. Ongoing SKM loss in the postoperative period may represent an early marker for worse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, PO Box 301402, Houston, TX, 77230-1402, USA
| | | | - Laura R Prakash
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, PO Box 301402, Houston, TX, 77230-1402, USA
| | - Maria Q B Petzel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, PO Box 301402, Houston, TX, 77230-1402, USA
| | - Nathan H Parker
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, PO Box 301402, Houston, TX, 77230-1402, USA
| | - An T Ngo-Huang
- Department of Palliative, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Fogelman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jason W Denbo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, PO Box 301402, Houston, TX, 77230-1402, USA
| | - Naveen Garg
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael P Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, PO Box 301402, Houston, TX, 77230-1402, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, PO Box 301402, Houston, TX, 77230-1402, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, PO Box 301402, Houston, TX, 77230-1402, USA
| | - Jason B Fleming
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, PO Box 301402, Houston, TX, 77230-1402, USA
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1484, PO Box 301402, Houston, TX, 77230-1402, USA.
| |
Collapse
|