Hybrid laryngotracheal reconstruction vs single and double stage: Indications and outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To describe outcomes from laryngotracheal reconstruction and decannulation rates for patients undergoing single stage, double stage and hybrid staged procedures at a single tertiary care institution and evaluate if the 1.5LTR is a viable reconstructive option for patients with subglottic stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary care otolaryngology specialty hospital and internationally.

SUBJECTS

All patients who underwent LTR by a single pediatric otolaryngology surgeon from 2008 to 2018.

METHODS

Charts were assessed for age, gender, etiology, type of reconstruction, comorbidities, length of stay, tracheostomy status and socioeconomic status. Analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel and multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

96 patients underwent laryngotracheal reconstruction at MEEI. Internationally, 36 patients underwent laryngotracheal reconstruction with the primary surgeon. Overall decannulation rates for ssLTR, dsLTR, and 1.5LTR were 95.6%, 77.8%, and 91.2% respectively. Our Operation Specific Decannulation Rates (one open airway procedure only) for ssLTR, dsLTR, and 1.5LTR were 87.5%, 33%, and 88% respectively. Adjusted odds of decannulation were not significantly different between males and females, white and non-white patients, or socioeconomic status. Neurological comorbidity was statistically significant for a decreased rate of decannulation (p = 0.0216).

CONCLUSION

The 1.5LTR is a viable option for airway reconstruction with strengths derived from both the ssLTR and dsLTR. At our institution we have seen decannulation rates and operation specific decannulation rates with the 1.5LTR approaching our ssLTR. It has replaced the bulk of our dsLTRs, which we reserve for patients that have significant neurological deficits and cannot tolerate extended sedation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

A Sustainable and Scalable Multidisciplinary Airway Teaching Mission: The Operation Airway 10-Year Experience

OBJECTIVE

To address whether a multidisciplinary team of pediatric otolaryngologists, anesthesiologists, pediatric intensivists, speech-language pathologists, and nurses can achieve safe and sustainable surgical outcomes in low-resourced settings when conducting a pediatric airway surgical teaching mission that features a program of progressive autonomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Consecutive case series with chart review.

SETTING

This study reviews 14 consecutive missions from 2010 to 2019 in Ecuador, El Salvador, and the Dominican Republic.

METHODS

Demographic data, diagnostic and operative details, and operative outcomes were collected. A country's program met graduation criteria if its multidisciplinary team developed the ability to autonomously manage the preoperative huddle, operating room discussion and setup, operative procedure, and postoperative multidisciplinary pediatric intensive care unit and floor care decision making. This was assessed by direct observation and assessment of surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 135 procedures were performed on 90 patients in Ecuador (n = 24), the Dominican Republic (n = 51), and El Salvador (n = 39). Five patients required transport to the United States to receive quaternary-level care. Thirty-six laryngotracheal reconstructions were completed: 6 single-stage, 12 one-and-a-half-stage, and 18 double-stage cases. We achieved a decannulation rate of 82%. Two programs (Ecuador and the Dominican Republic) met graduation criteria and have become self-sufficient. No mortalities were recorded.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest longitudinal description of an airway reconstruction teaching mission in low- and middle-income countries. Airway reconstruction can be safe and effective in low-resourced settings with a thoughtful multidisciplinary team led by local champions.

Laryngotracheal Reconstruction in the Pediatric Burn Patient: Surgical Techniques and Decision Making

The management of laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) in the pediatric burn patient is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. The mainstay of treatment for LTS is laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR), however, limited reports of burn-specific LTR techniques exist. Here, we provide insight into the initial airway evaluation, surgical decision making, anesthetic challenges, and incision modifications based on our experience in treating patients with this pathology. The initial airway evaluation can be complicated by microstomia, trismus, and neck contractures-the authors recommend treatment of these complications prior to initial airway evaluation to optimize safety. The surgical decision making regarding pursuing single-stage LTR, double-stage LTR, and 1.5-stage LTR can be challenging-the authors recommend 1.5-stage LTR when possible due to the extra safety of rescue tracheostomy and the decreased risk of granuloma, which is especially important in pro-inflammatory burn physiology. Anesthetic challenges include obtaining intravenous access, securing the airway, and intravenous induction-the authors recommend peripherally inserted central catheter when appropriate, utilizing information from the initial airway evaluation to secure the airway, and avoidance of succinylcholine upon induction. Neck and chest incisions are often within the TBSA covered by the burn injury-the authors recommend modifying typical incisions to cover unaffected skin whenever possible in order to limit infection and prevent wound healing complications. Pediatric LTR in the burn patient is challenging, but can be safe when the surgeon is thoughtful in their decision making.

Pediatric airway reconstruction: results after implementation of an airway team in Brazil

INTRODUCTION

Since development of pediatric intensive care units, children have increasingly and appropriately been treated for complex surgical conditions such as laryngotracheal stenosis. Building coordinated airway teams to achieve acceptable results is still a challenge.

OBJECTIVE

To describe patient demographics and surgical outcomes during the first 8years of a pediatric airway reconstruction team.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of children submitted to open airway reconstruction in a tertiary university healthcare facility during the first eight years of an airway team formation.

RESULTS

In the past 8 years 43 children underwent 52 open airway reconstructions. The median age at surgery was 4.1 years of age. Over half of the children (55.8%) had at least one comorbidity and over 80% presented Grade III and Grade IV subglottic stenosis. Other airway anomalies occurred in 34.8% of the cases. Surgeries performed were: partial and extended cricotracheal resections in 50% and laryngotracheoplasty with anterior and/or posterior grafts in 50%. Postoperative dilatation was needed in 34.15% of the patients. Total decannulation rate in this population during the 8-year period was 86% with 72% being decannulated after the first procedure. Average follow-up was 13.6 months. Initial grade of stenosis was predictive of success for the first surgery (p=0.0085), 7 children were submitted to salvage surgeries. Children with comorbidities had 2.5 greater odds (95% CI 1.2-4.9, p=0.0067) of unsuccessful surgery. Age at first surgery and presence of other airway anomalies were not significantly associated with success.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall success rate was 86%. Failures were associated with higher grades of stenosis and presence of comorbidities, but not with patient age or concomitant airway anomalies.

Comparison of Hybrid Laryngotracheal Reconstruction to Traditional Single- and Double-Stage Laryngotracheal Reconstruction

Objectives

(1) To describe outcomes from and modifications to the hybrid laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) technique and (2) to compare this technique to traditional single- and double-stage LTR (ssLTR/dsLTR).

Study Design

Chart review with case series.

Setting

Tertiary care otolaryngology specialty hospital.

Subjects

All patients under 18 years of age who underwent LTR by a single surgeon from July 1, 2009, to December 31, 2013.

Methods

Charts were assessed for age, gender, etiology of stenosis, type of reconstruction, comorbidities, length of stay, complications, and tracheostomy status. Analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank sum analysis.

Results

Forty-four patients were identified, with 13 hybrid LTRs, 27 ssLTRs, and 4 dsLTRs. Of the hybrid LTRs, an overall decannulation rate of 76.9% was noted, comparable to those for dsLTR. The hybrid LTR technique offered a significantly shorter period of narcotic use when compared to ssLTR (median 15 vs 21 days, P < .01). No patients in the hybrid LTR group developed supraglottic granulation tissue. There was no statistically significant difference in median length of stay for ssLTRs, dsLTRs, and hybrid LTRs ( P = .38).

Conclusion

The hybrid LTR technique is well tolerated and useful in patients of all ages. Narcotics can be weaned more quickly due to the presence of a secure airway at all times via the existing tracheostomy. Use of a long stent prevents formation of granulation tissue that may be seen with a suprastomal stent. This technique should be considered in patients with high-grade stenosis with a preexisting tracheostomy.

Systemwide change of sedation wean protocol following pediatric laryngotracheal reconstruction

IMPORTANCE

Pediatric laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) remains the standard surgical technique for expanding a stenotic airway and necessitates a multidisciplinary team. Sedation wean following LTR is a critical component of perioperative care. We identified variation and communications deficiencies with our sedation wean practice and describe our experience implementing a standardized sedation wean protocol.

OBJECTIVE

To standardize and decrease length of sedation wean in pediatric patients undergoing LTR.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Using Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) methodology, we implemented systemwide change at a tertiary care center with the goal of improving care based on best practice guidelines. We created a standardized electronic sedation wean communication document and retrospectively examined our experience in 29 consecutive patients who underwent LTR before (n = 16, prewean group) and after (n = 13, postwean group) wean document implementation.

INTERVENTIONS

Implementation of a standardized sedation protocol.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Presence of sedation wean document in the electronic medical record, length of sedation wean, and need for continued wean after discharge.

RESULTS

The sedation wean document was used in 92.3% patients in the postwean group. With the new process, the mean (SD) length of sedation wean was reduced from 16.19 (11.56) days in the prewean group to 8.92 (3.37) days in the postwean group (P = .045). Fewer patients in the postwean group required continued wean after discharge (81.3% vs 33.3%; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

We implemented a systemwide process change with the goal of improving care based on best practice guidelines, which significantly decreased the time required for sedation wean following LTR. Our methodological approach may have implications for other heterogeneous patient populations requiring a sedation wean.

Safety of outpatient airway dilation for adult laryngotracheal stenosis

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety of outpatient airway dilation for adult patients with subglottic or tracheal stenosis.

METHODS

The records of patients treated with airway dilation between October 2003 and September 2013 were reviewed. Outcomes of patients who underwent dilation as inpatients versus outpatients were compared. Emergency room visits, readmissions, and 3 or more primary care physician visits within 30 days postoperatively were specifically evaluated. Postoperative hemorrhage, airway edema, recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, reintubation, tracheostomy, tracheal rupture, pneumomediastinum, pneumothorax, acute respiratory distress, or death were also reviewed.

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen dilations performed in 53 patients with airway stenosis were included. Outpatient dilation was performed in 93 (82%); 21 (18%) underwent the procedure in the inpatient setting. Complications were low among both inpatient and outpatient groups (10% vs 1%, P=.09). No complications occurred during the overnight stay of the inpatient group.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient airway dilation is a safe and feasible procedure. It can be routinely performed on an ambulatory basis.

Management of congenital tracheal anomalies and laryngotracheoesophageal clefts

Congenital obstructions and anomalies of the pediatric airway are rare problems that may be associated with mild symptoms or critical stenoses that may be life threatening in the first few days of life. This review provides an overview of the embryologic development of the airway, different congenital anomalies associated with airway development, and surgical correction that may be associated with good long-term outcome.

Operation airway: the first sustainable, multidisciplinary, pediatric airway surgical mission

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the development and implementation of the first sustainable, multidisciplinary, pediatric airway surgical mission in an underserved country.

METHODS

This prospective, qualitative study was conducted for the first 4 Operation Airway missions in Quito, Ecuador. The major goals of the missions were to assist children with aerodigestive abnormalities, create a sustainable program where the local team could independently provide for their own patient population, develop an educational curriculum and training program for the local team, and cultivate a collaborative approach to provide successful multidisciplinary care.

RESULTS

Twenty patients ages 4 months to 21 years were included. Twenty-three bronchoscopies, 5 salivary procedures, 2 tracheostomies, 1 T-tube placement, 1 tracheocutaneous fistula closure, 2 open granuloma excisions, and 6 laryngotracheal reconstructions (LTRs) were performed. All LTR patients were decannulated. A new type of LTR (1.5 stage) was developed to meet special mission circumstances. Two videofluoroscopic swallow studies and 40 bedside swallow evaluations were performed. One local pediatric otolaryngologist, 1 pediatric surgeon, 3 anesthesiologists, 7 intensivists, 16 nurses, and 2 speech-language pathologists have received training. More than 25 hours of lectures were given, and a website was created collaboratively for educational and informational dissemination (http://www.masseyeandear.org/specialties/pediatrics/pediatric-ent/airway/OperationAirway/).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated the successful creation of the first mission stemming from a teaching institution with the goal of developing a sustainable, autonomous surgical airway program.