Surgeon Awareness of Operating Room Supply Costs

Variation in physician spending and its association with postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND

There is significant variation in inpatient expenditures among physicians and hospitals. This study aimed to characterize the association between variation in physician spending and short-term outcomes among patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for PDAC and CRC from 2010 to 2020 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result-Medicare-linked database. The cohort was divided into quartiles based on adjusted physician spending, and multivariate models were used to assess the association between physician spending and patient outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 27,596 Medicare beneficiaries, 25,615 (92.8%) underwent surgery for CRC and 1981 (7.2%) underwent surgery for PDAC. Of the variations in spending, 79.9% were due to patient-level factors, 13.3% were due to hospital characteristics, and 6.8% were due to surgeon-level variables. On multivariate analysis, there was no association between physician spending and 30-day readmission (with complications: first quartile [Q1], reference; Q4: odds ratio [OR], 1.10; 95% CI, 0.86-1.41; P = .123; without complications: Q1, reference; Q3, stage IV: OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.68-1.40; P = .882) or between physician spending and 30-day mortality (without complications: Q1, reference; Q2, stage I: OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.45-3.01; P = .804). However, an increase in physician spending was associated with higher 30-day mortality among patients with complications (Q1, reference; Q4: OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.72-3.03; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

There was more variation in healthcare spending across hospitals than across individual physicians. No consistent association between variation in physician spending and patient outcomes was noted. Wasteful spending can be reduced through targeted interventions aimed at reducing variations at the physician and hospital levels.

Investigating the sterile surgical supply waste in laparotomy surgery

BACKGROUND

Operating rooms contribute to over 40% of hospital expenses, with a portion attributed to waste from single-use, sterile surgical supplies (SUSSS). This research aimed to determine the amount of cost wastage due to not using SUSSS during laparotomy procedures.

METHODS

A descriptive-analytical investigation was conducted in two prominent teaching hospitals in Mashhad, Iran 2018. Seventy-seven laparotomy surgeries were scrutinized, documenting both used and unused disposable devices, with their respective costs being assessed. Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 16 software.

RESULTS

The study revealed that during surgery in the operating rooms, waste of SUSSS averaged 5.9%. Betadine solution and sterile Gauze types were the top two contributors to resource wastage. Sterile Gauze types incurred the highest cost loss. The study found a significant correlation between cost wastage and surgeon experience (r = 0.296, P < 0.001) as well as surgery duration (r = 0.439, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Inadequate management of available and commonly used disposable supplies leads to increased hospital expenses. Enhancing the surgical team's knowledge of sterile surgical supplies usage and making thoughtful selections can play a vital role in curbing health costs by minimizing waste of SUSSS in the operating rooms.

Lack of Association of Pediatric Surgical Patient Outcomes With Increased Disposable Operating Room Supply Costs

INTRODUCTION

There is wide variation in the cost of disposable operating room supplies between surgeons performing the same operation at the same institution. The general relationship between variation in disposable supply cost and patient outcomes is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between disposable supply cost and patient outcomes for sixteen common operations.

METHODS

Cost data were reviewed for the most common procedures performed by five surgical divisions at a single children's hospital over a six-month period in 2021. For procedure, the median disposable OR costs were calculated. Each operation performed was categorized as low cost (below the group median) or high cost (above the group median. We compared the rates of adverse events (clinic visit within 5 days, 30-day emergency department visit, unplanned reoperation, unplanned readmission, anesthesia complications, prolonged hospital length of stay, need for blood product transfusion, or death) between procedures with low and high disposable supply costs.

RESULTS

1139 operations performed by 48 unique surgeons from five specialties were included; 596 (52%) were low-cost and 543 (48%) high-cost. The low and high-cost groups did not differ regarding most demographic characteristics. Overall, 21.9% of children suffered any adverse outcome; this rate did not differ between the low and high-cost groups when evaluated individually or in aggregate (20.5% vs 23.6%, p = 0.23).

CONCLUSION

Our data demonstrate that across a wide range of pediatric surgical procedures, the cost of disposable operating room supplies was not associated with the risk of adverse outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Digital Preoperative Huddle Platform Use Leads to Decreased Surgical Cost

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Communication has a well-established effect on improving outcomes. The current study evaluated the effect of multidisciplinary preoperative team communication using a digital huddle software platform on operating room costs.

METHODS

A digital huddle software platform was implemented in March 2022 for neurosurgical procedures performed at a single tertiary care center. Surgeons were encouraged, but not required, to participate. General linear models were used to test the association between participation and the difference in supply-related cost and case length, using intergroup comparison and historical controls.

RESULTS

A total of 29626 cases (performed by 97 surgeons), conducted between March 2021 and June 2023, were included in our analysis. Cases from participating neurosurgeons (12 surgeons, 4064 cases) were compared with cases from nonparticipating neurosurgeons (6 surgeons, 2452 cases), non-neurosurgery cases carried out by the same operating room staff (20 orthopedic spine surgeons, 6073 cases), and non-neurosurgery cases performed in a different operating room unit (59 surgeons, 21 996 cases). In aggregate, operating room (OR) costs increased by 7.3% (95% CI: 0.9-14.1, P = .025) in the postintervention period. In the same period, participation in the digital huddle platform was associated with an OR utilization and supply-related cost decrease of 16.3% (95% CI: 8.3%-23.6%, P < .001). Among neurosurgeons specifically, participation was associated with a supply-related cost decrease of 17.5% (95% CI: 6.0%-27.5%, P = .0037). There was no change in case length (median case length 171 minutes, change: +2.7% increase, 95% CI:-2.2%-7.9%, P = .28).

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a digital huddle software platform resulted in an OR utilization and supply cost decrease among participants during a period when the overall nonparticipating control cohort experienced an increase in cost.

Operating Room Supply Cost and Value of Care after Implementing a Sustainable Quality Intervention

BACKGROUND

Variability in operating room supply cost is a modifiable cause of suboptimal resource use and low value of care (outcomes vs cost). This study describes implementation of a quality improvement intervention to decrease operating room supply costs.

STUDY DESIGN

An automated electronic health record data pipeline harmonized operating room supply cost data with patient and case characteristics and outcomes. For inpatient procedures, predicted mortality and length of stay were used to calculate observed-to-expected ratios and value of care using validated equations. For commonly performed (1 or more per week) procedures, the pipeline generated figures illustrating individual surgeon performance vs peers, costs for each surgeon performing each case type, and control charts identifying out-of-control cases and surgeons with more than 90th percentile costs, which were shared with surgeons and division chiefs alongside guidance for modifying case-specific supply instructions to operating room nurses and technicians.

RESULTS

Preintervention control (1,064 cases for 7 months) and postintervention (307 cases for 2 months) cohorts had similar baseline characteristics across all 16 commonly performed procedures. Median costs per case were lower in the intervention cohort ($811 [$525 to $1,367] vs controls: $1,080 [$603 to $1,574], p < 0.001), as was the incidence of out-of-control cases (19 (6.2%) vs 110 (10.3%), p = 0.03). Duration of surgery, length of stay, discharge disposition, and 30-day mortality and readmission rates were similar between cohorts. Value of care was higher in the intervention cohort (1.1 [0.1 to 1.5] vs 1.0 [0.2 to 1.4], p = 0.04). Pipeline runtime was 16:07.

CONCLUSIONS

An automated, sustainable quality improvement intervention was associated with decreased operating room supply costs and increased value of care.

Using Preference Cards to Support a Thoughtful, Evidence-based Orthopaedic Surgery Practice

INTRODUCTION

When orthopaedic surgeons begin or relocate their careers, they must communicate effectively about their instrumentation and equipment needs. 'Preference Cards' or 'Pick Lists' are generated by and for individual surgeons at the time of hire and can be updated over time to reflect their needs for common cases. Currently, such decisions are made without formal guidance or preparation.

BODY

Surgeons must consider and plan for their operating room needs. Health system and industry factors affect these decisions, as do surgeons' unique interests, preferences, and biases. Orthopaedic surgeons currently face challenges: formal education is deficient in this space, material and reprocessing costs are not transparent, relationships and contracts with industry are complex, and few health systems have mechanisms to support preference card optimization. This complex landscape influences utilization decisions and leaves opportunities for integration, collaboration, and innovation.

SUMMARY

Choices about instrument and resource utilization in the OR have wide-reaching impacts on costs, waste generation, OR efficiency, sterile processing, and industry trends. Surgeons and their teams have much to gain by making intentional choices and pursuing both individual and systematic improvements in this space.

The role of human capital and stress for cost awareness in the healthcare system: a survey among German hospital physicians

BACKGROUND

Germany has the highest per capita health care spending among EU member states, but its hospitals face pressure to generate profits independently due to the government's withdrawal of investment cost coverage. The diagnosis related groups (DRG) payment system was implemented to address the cost issue, challenging hospital physicians to provide services within predefined prices and an economic target corridor to reduce costs. This study examines the extent of cost awareness among medical personnel in German hospitals and its influencing factors.

METHODS

We developed an online survey in which participants across all specialties in hospitals estimated the prices in euros of four common interventions and answered questions about their human capital and perceived stress on the workplace. As a measure of cost awareness, we used the probability of estimating the prices correctly within a reasonable margin. We employed logit logistic regression estimators to identify influencing factors in a sample of 86 participants.

RESULTS

The results revealed that most of the respondents were unaware of the costs of common interventions. General human capital, acquired through prior education, and job-specific human capital had no influence on cost awareness, whereas domain-specific human capital, that is, gaining economic knowledge based on self-interest, had a positive nonlinear effect on cost awareness. Furthermore, an increased stress level negatively influenced cost awareness.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper is the first of its kind for the German health care sector that contributes responses to the question whether health care professionals in German hospitals have cost awareness and if not, what reasons lie behind this lack of knowledge. Our findings show that the cost awareness desired by the introduction of the DRG system has yet to be achieved by medical personnel.

Orthopaedic surgery residents report little subjective or objective familiarity with healthcare costs

PURPOSE

Residents have limited education regarding the cost of orthopaedic interventions. Orthopaedic residents' knowledge was surveyed in three scenarios involving an intertrochanteric femur fracture: 1) uncomplicated course with 2-day hospital stay; 2) complicated course necessitating ICU admission; and 3) readmission for pulmonary embolism management.

METHODS

From 2018 to 2020, 69 orthopaedic surgery residents were surveyed. Respondents estimated hospital charges and collections; professional charges and collections; implant cost; and level of knowledge depending on the scenario.

RESULTS

Most residents (83.6%) reported feeling "not knowledgeable". Respondents reporting "somewhat knowledgeable" did not perform better than those who reported "not knowledgeable". In the uncomplicated scenario, residents underestimated hospital charges and collections (p < 0.01; p = 0.87), and overestimated hospital charges and collections and professional collections (all p < 0.01) with an average percent error of 57.2%. Most residents (88.4%) were aware the sliding hip screw construct costs less than a cephalomedullary nail. In the complex scenario, while residents underestimated the hospital charges (p < 0.01), the estimated collections were closer to the actual figure (p = 0.16). In the third scenario, residents overestimated the charges and collections (p = 0.04; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Orthopaedic surgery residents receive little education regarding healthcare economics and feel unknowledgeable therefore a role for formal economic education during orthopaedic residency may exist.

No longer a blank cheque: a narrative scoping review of physician awareness of cost

OBJECTIVES

Healthcare costs have been steadily rising, and attention to cost containment in healthcare systems is increasingly important. It has been previously established that physicians lack adequate awareness of cost in health care and that by increasing awareness, costs can be reduced. This scoping review examines cost awareness of medications, investigations and procedures and identifies potential interventions that may serve to improve physician awareness.

STUDY DESIGN

A scoping review was performed to evaluate the literature based on established Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

METHODS

A review of electronic databases was performed for studies regarding physician awareness of cost, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar.

RESULTS

An initial 4350 citations were identified, and 76 articles were included for full text analysis. Combined, these studies assessed 18,901 physicians. The overwhelming majority (91%) found cost awareness in physicians was low and demonstrated significant room for cost reduction. Eighteen of the 76 studies assessed an intervention to improve physician awareness of cost and used either a price list (89%) or a teaching session (11%) as the primary intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Research demonstrates that there is still a lack of awareness among physicians of the costs of medications, investigations and procedures/consumables. Initial approaches using price display and teaching sessions have shown promise. Further research into best practices for education around cost, beginning in medical school and continuing into established medical and surgical practices, may lead to increased cost savings in health care.

Variation in cost of disposable operating room supplies at a children's hospital

BACKGROUND

Operating room (OR) costs account for 40% of hospital costs. Disposable supplies make up a portion of OR costs and are the only cost that is under control of the surgeon. There are little data to explain how surgeons select surgical supplies and what factors predict supply selection. Our goal with the current work was to assess variation in cost of disposable OR supplies at the surgeon level, hypothesizing high variability would be observed.

STUDY DESIGN

Cost data were reviewed for the most common procedures performed by five surgical divisions at a single children's hospital over a six-month period in 2021. For each procedure, the average disposable OR costs for each surgeon were tabulated and compared to the median supply cost for a given procedure at the group level.

RESULTS

For each procedure, the variation ranged from 149% (gastrostomy tube placement) to 758% (tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy). The median supply cost for an individual surgeon was not always above or below the median supply cost for that procedure for the group. No relationship was observed between whether the supply cost was above or below the median for a given case and a surgeon's case volume, years in practice, or operative length. There was also no relationship between surgeon volume and median cost, surgery length, and years of experience.

CONCLUSION

These data demonstrate variation in the cost of disposable OR supplies at the individual surgeon level at a single institution. This variation is not explained by case volume, years in practice, or operative length.

Routine postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans following acetabulum open reduction internal fixation (ORIF): A survey of orthopaedic traumatologists

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the practices related to obtaining postoperative pelvic CT scans following acetabular ORIF and revision surgery rates.

DESIGN

A 20-question survey published on the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) website assessed each surgeon's preference and rationale for or against the routine use of postoperative CT scans for acetabular fractures.

PARTICIPANTS

Fellowship-trained orthopaedic traumatologists.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

We examined the percentage of surgeons ordering routine postoperative CT scans, surgeon demographics, and revision surgery rates based on these routine CT scan results.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 57 surgeons. Practices varied regarding postoperative CT scans, with 16 surgeons (28%, Group A) routinely ordering them and 41 surgeons (72%, Group B) not ordering them on all patients. No significant difference in surgeon demographics were found between the groups. Majority of Group A report a revision surgery rate of <1% based on the results of the postoperative CT. Group A report routine postoperative scans were obtained to assess reduction, hardware placement, identify intra-articular fragments, and for educational purposes. Group B did not obtain routine postoperative CTs due to the following: unlikely to change postoperative treatment, adequate reduction and instrumentation placement assessed intraoperatively and by postoperative radiographs, and increased radiation exposure and cost to patients. Group B did report obtaining postop CT scans on select patients, with inadequate intraoperative imaging and postoperative neurological changes being the most common indications.

CONCLUSION

The routine use of postoperative CTs following open reduction internal fixation of acetabular fractures is a controversial topic. While we recognize the role for postoperative CT scans in select patients, our study questions the clinical utility of these scans in all patients and in conclusion do not recommend this protocol.

Surgical Cost Awareness Program Study: Impact of a Novel, Real-Time, Cost Awareness Intervention on Operating Room Expenses in Thoracoscopic Lobectomy

BACKGROUND

For surgical patients, operating room expenses are significant drivers of overall hospitalization costs. Surgical teams often lack awareness of the costs associated with disposable surgical supplies, which may lead to unnecessary expenditures. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether a Surgical Cost Awareness Program would reduce operating room costs.

STUDY DESIGN

A prototype software displays the types and costs of disposable instruments used in real-time during surgery and generates insight-driven operative cost reports, which are automatically sent to the surgeons. A prospective pre-post controlled trial of thoracoscopic lobectomy procedures performed by 7 surgeons at a single academic center was conducted. Control and intervention groups consisted of consecutive cases from February 2nd through June 23, 2021, and from June 28th through December 22, 2021, respectively. The primary outcome was mean per case surgical disposables cost.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-two lobectomies were evaluated throughout the study period (control: n = 164; intervention: n = 158). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Mean disposables cost per case was $3,320.73 ± $814.83 in the control group compared with $2,567.64 ± $594.59 in the intervention group, representing a mean cost reduction of $753.08 (95% CI, $622.29 to $883.87; p < 0.001). All surgeons experienced a reduction in disposable costs after the intervention. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes did not differ between the cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Providing real-time educational feedback to surgical teams significantly reduced costs associated with disposable surgical equipment without compromising perioperative outcomes for lobectomy. Integrating the novel AssistIQ software across other procedural settings may generate further data insights with the potential for significant cost savings on a larger scale.

Preventable operating room delays in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery: Identifying opportunities for cost reduction

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to characterize the types of intraoperative delays during robotic-assisted thoracic surgery, operating room staff awareness/perceptions of delays, and cost impact of delays on overall operative costs.

METHODS

Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery cases from May to August 2019 were attended by 3 third-party observers to record intraoperative delays. The postoperative surveys were given to operating room staff to elicit perceived delays. Observed versus perceived delays were compared using the McNemar test. Direct costs and charges per delay were calculated.

RESULTS

Forty-four cases were observed, of which a majority were lobectomies (n = 38 [86%]). A total of 71 delays were recorded by observers, encompassing 75% of cases (n = 33), with an average delay length of 3.6 minutes (±5.3 minutes). The following delays were observed: equipment failure (n = 40, average delay length 5.0 minutes (±6.5 minutes), equipment missing (n = 15, 2.2 minutes [±1.4 minutes]), staff unfamiliarity with equipment (n = 4, 3.4 minutes [± 1.5 minutes]), and other (n = 12, 4.5 minutes [±5.3 minutes]). The detection rates for any intraoperative delay were consistently lower for all of the operating room team members compared with observers, including surgeons (34.3% vs 77.1%; P = .0003), first assistants (41.9% vs 74.2%; P = .0075), surgical technologists (39.4% vs 72.7%; P = .0045), and circulating nurses (41.18% vs 76.47% minutes; P = .0013). The average operating room variable direct cost of delays based on the average total delay length per case was $225.52 (±$350.18) and was 1.6% (range 0-10.6%) of the total case charges.

CONCLUSION

The lack of perception of intraoperative delays hinders operating teams from effectively closing the variable cost gaps. Future studies are needed to explore methods of increasing perception of delays and opportunities to improve operating room efficiency.

Routine Postoperative Computed Tomography Scans Following Posterior Pelvic Fixation of Pelvic Ring Fractures: A Survey of (OTA) Orthopaedic Traumatologists

OBJECTIVE

To assess practices related to ordering computed tomography (CT) scans routinely after posterior pelvic ring fixation and revision surgery rates.

DESIGN

A 20-question cross-sectional survey.

PARTICIPANTS

Fellowship-trained orthopaedic traumatologists.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

(1) Percentage of surgeons ordering a routing postoperative CT after posterior pelvic ring fixation, (2) Revision surgery rates based on routine CT scan results.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 57 surgeons. Practices varied regarding postoperative CT scans, with 20 surgeons (35%, group A) routinely ordering them and 37 surgeons (65%, group B) not ordering them on all patients. Group A were younger and with less years of experience than those in Group B. Most group A surgeons report a revision surgery rate of <1% based on results of the postoperative CT. Group A report routine postoperative scans were obtained to assess reduction, instrumentation placement, and for educational purposes. Group B did not obtain routine postoperative CTs because of the following: unlikely to change postoperative treatment course, adequate reduction and instrumentation placement assessed intraoperatively and by postoperative radiographs, and increased radiation exposure and cost to patients. Group B did report obtaining postop CT scans on select patients, with postoperative neurological deficit being the most common indication.

CONCLUSIONS

The routine use of postoperative CTs following posterior fixation of pelvic ring fractures is a controversial topic. Although we recognize the role for postoperative CT scans in select patients, our study questions the clinical utility of these scans in all patients and in conclusion do not recommend this protocol.

Variability in the Use of Disposable Surgical Supplies: A Surgeon Survey and Life Cycle Analysis

PURPOSE

A substantial amount of waste is generated during surgery, yet few studies have investigated this problem. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter survey to investigate how the variation in the use of disposable supplies contributes to the environmental and financial burdens of health care.

METHODS

We created a questionnaire to identify differences in supply use and practice characteristics among hand surgeons who participated in the Wrist and Radius Injury Surgical Trial. We determined the average cumulative cost of 10 key surgical items based on the responses. Subsequently, we estimated the kilograms of carbon dioxide emitted during the life cycle of supplies, from raw material extraction to production and disposal, using economic input-output life cycle analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-five surgeons from 19 institutions responded to the survey (65% response rate). Based on the difference in costs between surgeons who used the fewest and the most supplies, we determined that expenditures and carbon dioxide emissions could decrease by $22.47 and 10.9 kg per procedure, respectively, with leaner use of 10 key items. Furthermore, assuming that surgeon variation in supply use is present in other surgical subspecialties, we estimated that $2.4 billion in savings and an 800.6 thousand metric ton reduction in carbon emissions could be achieved if all US surgeons reduced their supply use by this amount.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed considerable variations in the use of disposable supplies among hand surgeons, highlighting the need for evidence-based tools, policies, and education campaigns to reduce hospital waste across health care systems.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Optimal use of disposable supplies is necessary to reduce the cost and environmental burden of hand surgery care.

Reducing Operating Room Cost: Comparing Attending and Surgical Trainee Perceptions About the Implementation of Supply Receipts

BACKGROUND

As operating room (OR) expenditures increase, faculty and surgical trainees will play a key role in curbing future costs. However, supply cost utilization varies widely among providers and, despite requirements for cost education during surgical training, little is known about trainees' comfort discussing these topics. To improve OR cost transparency, our institution began delivering real-time supply "receipts" to faculty and trainees after each surgical case. This study compares faculty and surgical trainees' perceptions about supply receipts and their effect on individual practice and cultural change.

STUDY DESIGN

Faculty and surgical trainees (residents and fellows) from all adult surgical specialties at a large academic center were emailed separate surveys.

RESULTS

A total of 120 faculty (30.0% response rate) and 119 trainees (35.7% response rate) completed the survey. Compared with trainees, faculty are more confident discussing OR costs (p < 0.001). Two-thirds of trainees report discussing OR costs with faculty as opposed to 77.0% of faculty who acknowledge having these conversations (p = 0.08). Both groups showed a strong commitment to reduce OR expenditures, with 87.3% of faculty and 90.0% of trainees expressing a responsibility to curb OR costs (p = 0.84). After 1 year of implementation, faculty continue to have high interest levels in supply receipts (82.4%) and many surgeons review them after each case (67.7%). In addition, 74.3% of faculty are now aware of how to lower OR costs and 52.5% have changed the OR supplies they use. Trainees, in particular, desire additional cost-reducing efforts at our institution (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Supply receipts have been well received and have led to meaningful cultural changes. However, trainees are less confident discussing these issues and desire a greater emphasis on OR cost in their curriculum.

Lack of Awareness of Reimbursement and Compensation Models amongst Cardiothoracic Surgery Trainees

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to identify trainee knowledge gaps in reimbursement and compensation, determine the perceived importance of understanding these topics, and to explore if the Thoracic Surgery Curriculum needs additional educational material.

METHODS

The Thoracic Surgical Residents Association (TSRA) Executive committee selected the research proposal and distributed an anonymous electronic survey to 531 ACGME cardiothoracic surgery trainees. Standard descriptive statistics and regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

114 responses were collected (response rate 21.5%). Most trainees understand little or not at all about how attending surgeons are reimbursed (n=74, 69%). Most trainees reported knowing little or nothing about pay-for-performance compensation (n=73, 67%), bundled care (n=82, 75%) or value-based reimbursement (n=84, 77%). Only approximately 20% of trainees were accurate in estimating surgeon reimbursement for three common cardiothoracic surgery procedures to within 20% of the true reimbursement value, while approximately 30% were accurate to within 50% of the true reimbursement value. No respondent characteristics were found to be associated with a more or less accurate reimbursement response. Additionally, 81% of trainees responded that by the conclusion of training, understanding surgeon reimbursement is very important or extremely important (n=87) and 90% of trainees either somewhat agree or strongly agree with including these topics in the Thoracic Surgical Curriculum (n=95).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite acknowledging the importance of understanding physician compensation and reimbursement, cardiothoracic surgery trainees do not understand how the current models work. This study exemplifies the need for a succinct curriculum in this domain for trainees nationwide.

Surgeon education through a surgical cost feedback system reduces supply cost in endoscopic skull base surgery

OBJECTIVE

A large proportion of healthcare expense is operating room (OR) costs. As a means of cost mitigation, several institutions have implemented surgeon education programs to bring awareness about supply costs. This study evaluates the impact of a surgical cost feedback system (surgical receipt) on the supply costs of endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) procedures.

METHODS

The supply costs of each ESBS surgical case were prospectively collected and analyzed before and after the implementation of a nonincentivized, automated, and itemized weekly surgical receipt system between January 2017 and December 2019. Supply cost data collected 15 months prior to intervention were compared with cost data 21 months after implementation of the surgical receipt system. Demographics, surgical details, and OR time were collected retrospectively.

RESULTS

Of 105 ESBS procedures analyzed, 36 preceded and 69 followed implementation of cost feedback. There were no significant differences in patient age (p = 0.064), sex (p = 0.489), surgical indication (p = 0.389), or OR anesthesia time (p = 0.51) for patients treated before and after implementation. The mean surgical supply cost decreased from $3824.41 to $3010.35 (p = 0.002) after implementation of receipt feedback. Usage of dural sealants (p = 0.043), microfibrillar collagen hemostat (p = 0.007), and oxidized regenerated cellulose hemostat (p < 0.0001) and reconstructive technique (p = 0.031) significantly affected cost. Mediation analysis confirmed that the overall cost reduction was predominantly driven by reduced use of dural sealant; this cost saving exceeded the incremental cost of greater use of packing materials such as microfibrillar collagen hemostat.

CONCLUSIONS

Education of surgeons regarding surgical supply costs by a surgical receipt feedback system can reduce the supply cost per case of ESBS operations.

Impact of surgeon rhBMP-2 cost awareness on complication rates and health system costs for spinal arthrodesis

OBJECTIVE

Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) is used in spinal arthrodesis procedures to enhance bony fusion. Research has suggested that it is the most cost-effective fusion enhancer, but there are significant upfront costs for the healthcare system. The primary objective of this study was to determine whether intraoperative dosing and corresponding costs changed with surgeon cost awareness. The secondary objective was to describe surgical complications before and after surgeon awareness of rhBMP-2 cost.

METHODS

A retrospective medical record review was conducted to identify patients who underwent spinal arthrodesis procedures performed by a single surgeon, supplemented with rhBMP-2, from June 2016 to June 2018. Collected data included rhBMP-2 dosage, rhBMP-2 list price, and surgical complications. Expected Medicare reimbursement was calculated. Data were analyzed before and after surgeon awareness of rhBMP-2 cost.

RESULTS

Forty-eight procedures were performed using rhBMP-2, 16 before and 32 after surgeon cost awareness. Prior to cost awareness, the most frequent rhBMP-2 dosage level was x-small (38.9%, n = 7), followed by large (27.8%, n = 5) and small (22.2%, n = 4). After cost awareness, the most frequent rhBMP-2 dosage was xx-small (56.8%, n = 21), followed by x-small (21.6%, n = 8) and large (13.5%, n = 5). The rhBMP-2 average cost per surgery was $4116.56 prior to surgeon cost awareness versus $2268.38 after. Two complications were observed in the pre-cost awareness surgical group; 2 complications were observed in the post-cost awareness surgical group.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeon awareness of rhBMP-2 cost resulted in use of smaller rhBMP-2 doses, decreased rhBMP-2 cost per surgery, and decreased overall hospital admission charges, without a detectable increase in surgical complications.

A simple "passive awareness" intervention to decrease the cost of thoracoscopic lobectomy

In thoracic surgery, disposable instruments are significant drivers of cost. There is variation in disposable instrument use among surgeons. It was hypothesized that a "passive awareness" intervention (displaying a pricing list of disposable instruments in the operating theater) would decrease operative costs. A current price list of disposable instruments used in thoracoscopic lobectomy was displayed in the thoracic surgery operating theater. Consecutive patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy 6 months prior to price list display (Period 1) and 6 months following price list display (Period 2) were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used to describe case distribution and lobectomy costs. T test and linear regression were used to examine the impact of surgeon, lobe removed, and time period. Over the study period, 71 patients underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy (Period 1: n = 36, Period 2: n = 35). Median per-lobectomy disposables cost decreased from $2063.22 (Interquartile range [IQR] $788.49) in Period 1 to $1885.92 (IQR $552.26) in Period 2; p = 0.03. There was a significant reduction in the median number of "high cost disposables" between Periods 1 and 2 (5.5-5.0, respectively; p = 0.04). In multiple linear regression, there was a decrease in total per-lobectomy cost of $286.21 (p = 0.03) and a decrease in stapler cartridge cost of $266.89 (p = 0.03) when controlling for surgeon and lobe. There was a significant reduction in disposable instrument expenditure per thoracoscopic lobectomy following posting of instrument costs in the operating theater. These findings suggest that a simple passive awareness intervention is effective in influencing surgeon behavior to reduce disposable instrument costs.

Curtailing Unnecessary Waste Among Operating Room Personnel: Evaluating the Cost Awareness of Commonly Used Surgical Items

BACKGROUND

Operating rooms (ORs) generate 70% of hospital waste, leading to increased costs for the hospital, patient, and the environment. The lack of cost awareness among physicians has been well documented; however, there is little information on anesthesiologists or ancillary OR staff. This study aimed to evaluate the cost awareness of commonly used items at an academic medical center among OR personnel.

METHODS

Anonymous surveys were distributed to OR personnel (nurses, surgical technicians (STs), nurse anesthetists, anesthesiologists, surgeons, and residents), asking for the estimated costs of ten commonly used items. These costs were then compared against actual costs to evaluate the accuracy of participants' estimates. Responders were clustered by job, highest level of education, and years of experience for comparison.

RESULTS

167 surveys were collected, and overall only 16.4% of estimates were accurate within 50% of actual price. No significant differences in accuracy between groups were identified overall (P = .2), but both surgical and anesthesia attendings had significantly higher rates of correct responses than their respective residents. No difference was seen in accuracy when all attendings (surgeons and anesthesiologists) were compared with either nurses or STs. Linear regression demonstrated no correlation between number of years at current position or years at institution and number of correct responses (R² = .0025 and R² = .005, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Addressing the knowledge deficit around item costs via global education of all OR personnel (surgeons, anesthesia providers, and ancillary staff) could be a viable pathway to reduce waste, and thus cost, for our healthcare system.

Bargain Hunting for Buffered Lidocaine: A Collaborative Discovery of Cost-saving Strategies That Can Improve Patient Care

Buffered lidocaine is a local anesthetic option during percutaneous needle-directed procedures in the breast. At our institution, sodium bicarbonate (the buffer) is dispensed in volumes that frequently lead to medical waste and shortages. In this study, we describe how moving the buffering of lidocaine from the procedure room to our clinical hospital pharmacy results in a reduction in costs and improves satisfaction across the breast radiology department. While cost savings are difficult to tease out in practices that opt for bundled payments, we were able to access pricing and supply data and coordinate with our pharmacy to change our practice. Making these changes saves our practice $26 000 a year and allows us to continue to offer buffered lidocaine even during sodium bicarbonate shortages. This manuscript describes how these changes came about and their economic impact.

Reducing cost and waste in pediatric laparoscopic procedures

BACKGROUND

In 2017 the healthcare cost in the United States accounted for 17.9% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP). Furthermore, healthcare facilities produce more than 4 billion pounds of waste annually. Interhospital and intersurgeon variabilities in surgical procedures are some of the drivers of high healthcare cost and waste. We sought to determine the effect of a monthly surgeon report card detailing the utilization and cost of disposable and reusable surgical supplies on cost and waste reduction for pediatric laparoscopic procedures.

METHODS

Starting in July 2017, surgeons were provided with an individual report with supply cost per case, high cost, and disposable supply utilization, and clinical outcomes. Cost, utilization, and clinical outcomes six quarters before and after the intervention were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 998 pediatric laparoscopic procedures were analyzed. We reduced the median supply cost per case by 43% after the intervention with total cost savings of $71,035 for the first four quarters. We also reduced the use of disposable trocars by 56% and the use of disposable harmonics and staplers by 33%.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a periodic surgeon report card, we significantly reduced supply cost and utilization of disposable items for all pediatric laparoscopic procedures performed at the University of Wisconsin American Family Children's Hospital.

TYPE OF STUDY

Cost effectiveness study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Taking the Leap Toward Cost-Conscious Education in Obstetrics and Gynaecology: A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

Residents have a professional obligation with respect to the stewardship of health care resources, yet there is a paucity of research on how to improve residents' cost-awareness. Rising health care expenditures highlight a critical need to improve education related to this competency. This study aimed to test if an educational module can teach residents to make cost-conscious decisions and reduce health care spending.

METHODS

All Canadian obstetrics and gynaecology residents in 2017 were eligible to participate in this randomized controlled trial. The study was administered online via REDCap. Interested residents were enrolled, stratified by level of training, and block randomized. Residents completed a survey to determine their management of 4 obstetrical scenarios. The intervention group reviewed an educational module on cost-effective ordering prior to completing the survey; the control group was given the option to review the module afterward. The primary outcome was mean total expenditures, compared between the 2 groups using the t test.

RESULTS

Eighty-five residents were enrolled between August and November 2017, and 63 residents from 13 Canadian residency programs completed the study requirements (33 control and 30 intervention). Mean total expenditure was CAD$291.03 (95% CI 259.38-322.68) versus CAD$192.98 (95% CI 170.67-215.29) for the control and intervention groups, respectively. These figures corresponded to a 33.69% or CAD$98.05 reduction in total expenditures (P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This educational module decreased expenditures by Canadian obstetrics and gynaecology residents managing hypothetical obstetrical cases. This introduces a potential curriculum innovation to improve resident education in judicious use of health care resources.

Surgical Supply Cost Awareness Is Associated With Lower Costs: A Single-Center Experience

Surgeons are often unfamiliar with the costs of surgical instrumentation and supplies. We hypothesized that surgeon cost feedback would be associated with a reduction in cost. A multidisciplinary team evaluated surgical supply costs for laparoscopic appendectomies of 7 surgeons (surgeons A-G) at a single-center academic institution. In the intervention, each surgeon was debriefed with their average supply cost per case, their partner's average supply cost per case, the cost of each surgical instrument/supply, and the cost of alternatives. In addition, the laparoscopic appendectomy tray was standardized to remove extraneous instruments. Pre-intervention (March 2017-February 2018) and post-intervention (March 2018-October 2018) costs were compared. Pre-intervention, the surgeons' average supply cost per case ranged from $754-$1189; when ranked from most to least expensive, surgeon A > B > C > D > E > F > G. Post-intervention, the surgeons' average supply cost per case ranged from $676 to $846, and ranked from surgeon G > D > F > C > E > B > A. Overall, the average cost per case was lower in the post-intervention group ($854.35 vs. $731.11, P < .001). This resulted in savings per case of $123.24 (14.4%), to a total annualized savings of $29 151.

Predictors of the cost of hysterectomy for benign indications

INTRODUCTION

Hysterectomy is a commonly performed procedure with widely variable costs. As gynecologists divert from invasive to minimally invasive approaches, many factors come into play in determining hysterectomy cost and efforts should be sought to minimize it. Our objective was to identify the predictors of hysterectomy cost.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study where women who underwent hysterectomy for benign conditions at the University of Texas Medical Branch from 2009 to 2016 were identified. We obtained and analyzed demographic, operative, and financial data from electronic medical records and the hospital finance department.

RESULTS

We identified 1,847 women. Open hysterectomy was the most frequently practiced (35.8 %), followed by vaginal (23.7 %), laparoscopic (23.6 %), and robotic (16.9 %) approaches. Multivariate regression demonstrated that hysterectomy charges can be significantly predicted from surgical approach, patient's age, operating room (OR) time, length of stay (LOS), estimated blood loss, insurance type, fiscal year, and concomitant procedures. Charges increased by $3,723.57 for each day increase in LOS (P <0.001), by $76.02 for each minute increase in OR time (P <0.001), and by $48.21 for each one-year increase in age (P 0.037). Adjusting for LOS and OR time remarkably decreased the cost of open and robotic hysterectomy, respectively when compared with the vaginal approach.

CONCLUSION

Multiple demographic and operative factors can predict the cost of hysterectomy. Healthcare providers, including gynecologists, are required to pursue additional roles in proper resource management and be acquainted with the cost drivers of therapeutic interventions. Future efforts and policies should target modifiable factors to minimize cost and promote value-based practices.

Surgeon cost feedback through a surgical receipt program reduces cost in sinonasal surgery

BACKGROUND

Operating room (OR) costs are a large portion of healthcare expenses. This study evaluates the impact of a surgeon-targeted surgical receipt cost feedback system on OR supply costs in sinonasal surgery and individual components contributing to procedural cost.

METHODS

Itemized weekly surgical receipts detailing individual case supply costs were analyzed before and after the implementation of a non-incentivized surgeon cost feedback system between January 2017 and June 2019. Supply cost data collected 15 months prior to intervention was compared to cost data 15 months after implementation of the weekly automated receipt dissemination to surgeons. Chi square test was used for categorical data and the Wilcoxon test was used to compare change in cost. Univariate and mediation analyses were performed to assess variables impacting cost.

RESULTS

Of 502 sinonasal procedures analyzed, 239 were before and 264 after cost feedback implementation. There were no significant differences in age/gender, or indication for surgery. The median OR supply cost decreased from $1229.64 to $1097.22 (p = 0.02) after receipt implementation. There were effects of procedure type (p = 0.02), circulating nurse specialization (p < 0.001), steroid eluting stent (p = 0.002), and sinus drill (p < 0.001) on cost. Mediation analysis confirmed full mediation by decreasing use of steroid-eluting stents.

CONCLUSION

Surgeon cost feedback in the form of individualized OR surgical receipts is an effective model to reduce supply cost per case in sinonasal surgery.

Cost Awareness of Common Supplies Is Severely Impaired Among All Members of the Surgical Team

BACKGROUND

Increased health care spending concerns have generated interest in reducing operating room (OR) costs, but the cost awareness of the surgical team selecting intraoperative supplies remains unclear. This work characterizes knowledge of supply cost among surgeons and OR staff in a large academic hospital and seeks to examine the role of experience and training with regards to cost insight.

METHODS

This work is a cross-sectional study of surgeons, trainees, nurses, and surgical technicians (n = 372) across all surgical specialties at a large academic hospital. Participants completed a survey reporting frequency of use and estimated cost for 11 common surgical supplies as well as opinions on access to cost information in the OR. Cost estimation error was expressed as the ratio of estimated-to-actual cost, and groups were compared with one-way analysis of variance and chi-squared testing. Spearman correlation (ρ) was used to describe the relationship between monotonic variables.

RESULTS

Overestimation error was universal and ranged widely (3.80-49.79). There was no significant difference in estimation accuracy when stratified by role or years of experience. Less expensive items had higher rates of estimation error than more expensive items (P < 0.001), and a moderately strong relationship was found between decreased item cost and increased estimation error (ρ: 0.49). The overwhelming majority (91%) of respondents expressed a desire to learn more about supply pricing.

CONCLUSIONS

Price knowledge of common supplies is globally impaired for entire surgical team but coexists with a strong desire to augment cost awareness. Improved access to cost information has a high potential to inform surgical decision-making and decrease OR waste.

Attitudes and awareness of suture anchor cost: a survey of shoulder surgeons performing rotator cuff repairs

BACKGROUND

The cost of health care in the United States accounts for 18% of the nation's gross domestic product and is expected to reach 20% by 2020. Physicians are responsible for 60%-80% of decisions resulting in health care expenditures. Rotator cuff repairs account for $1.2-$1.6 billion in US health care expenditures annually. The purpose of this study is to assess surgeons' cost awareness in the setting of rotator cuff repairs. The hypothesis is that practice environment and training affect cost consciousness and incentivization will lead to more cost-effective choices.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, a 21-item survey was distributed via the email list services of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Arthroscopy Association of North America. Data collected included demographics, variables regarding rotator cuff repair (technique, number of companies used, procedures per month), and knowledge of costs.

RESULTS

Responses from 345 surgeons in 23 countries were obtained with the majority (89%) being from the United States. Most surgeons were "cost-conscious" (275, 70.7%). Of these surgeons, 62.9% are willing to switch suture anchors brands to reduce overall costs if incentivized. Cost-conscious surgeons were more likely to be fellowship trained in shoulder and elbow (51.81% vs. 38.57%, P = .048), be paid based on productivity (73.53% vs. 61.43%, P = .047), and receive shared profits (85.4% vs. 75%, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

The majority of orthopedic surgeons are both cost-conscious and willing to change their practice to reduce costs if incentivized to do so. A better understanding of implant costs combined with incentives may help reduce health care expenditure.

Analysis of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Healthcare Costs via the Value-Driven Outcomes Tool

BACKGROUND

Examining the costs of single- and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is important for the identification of cost drivers and potentially reducing patient costs. A novel tool at our institution provides direct costs for the identification of potential drivers.

OBJECTIVE

To assess perioperative healthcare costs for patients undergoing an ACDF.

METHODS

Patients who underwent an elective ACDF between July 2011 and January 2017 were identified retrospectively. Factors adding to total cost were placed into subcategories to identify the most significant contributors, and potential drivers of total cost were evaluated using a multivariable linear regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 465 patients (mean, age 53 ± 12 yr, 54% male) met the inclusion criteria for this study. The distribution of total cost was broken down into supplies/implants (39%), facility utilization (37%), physician fees (14%), pharmacy (7%), imaging (2%), and laboratory studies (1%). A multivariable linear regression analysis showed that total cost was significantly affected by the number of levels operated on, operating room time, and length of stay. Costs also showed a narrow distribution with few outliers and did not vary significantly over time.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that facility utilization and supplies/implants are the predominant cost contributors, accounting for 76% of the total cost of ACDF procedures. Efforts at lowering costs within these categories should make the most impact on providing more cost-effective care.

The Direct Costs of Microsurgical Resection of Vestibular Schwannomas

OBJECTIVE

To determine and itemize surgical costs associated with the translabyrinthine (TL), retrosigmoid (RS), and middle cranial fossa (MCF) approaches for microsurgical excision of vestibular schwannoma (VS).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cost analysis study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Thirty consecutive adult patients underwent microsurgical excision of VS by either TL, RS, or MCF approach (10 per approach).

INTERVENTIONS

Microsurgical excision of VS by one of the three major approaches. Medical and financial data were collected.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Total operating room time (minutes), skin-to-skin time (minutes), operating room cost ($US), and surgical supplies cost ($US).

RESULTS

The MCF approach was associated with the shortest skin-to-skin time (230.3 min, p < 0.001). Mean overall nonsurgical room time was 94.7 minutes and not significantly different among approaches (p = 0.55). Mean total surgical supplies cost was $5,028 and was the highest for the RS ($7,116; p < 0.001) but not significantly different between TL and MCF. Mean operating room services charges were $68,417 overall and were the lowest for the MCF group ($53,306; p = 0.01). Tumor size was not correlated with surgical supplies cost (p = 0.74). The items associated with the highest average cost per case were the surgical aspirator ($1,062), drill burs ($928), and titanium implants ($575). There was redundancy in multiple surgical items such as drill burs, hemostatic agents, and sutures.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to provide a detailed itemization of the surgical expenses specific to VS resection. Elevated nonsurgical room time and supply redundancy provides the opportunity for decreasing surgical costs and waste.

French ICU's health care workers have a poor knowledge of the cost of the devices they use for patient care: A prospective multicentric study

PURPOSE

ICU patient's care may require the use of onerous devices, which contributes to make this department one of the most expensive in the hospital. It seemed us relevant to assess healthcare workers' (HCWs) knowledge of the cost of the devices daily used in ICU.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An anonymous questionnaire was administered on a voluntary basis to HCWs of 3 ICUs.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Cost estimations were expressed as percentage of the real cost; an estimation was considered correct if it was ±50% of the true price. 107 HCWs (66 physicians and 41 nurses and nurse aids) answered the survey. Only 29% of estimations were within 50% of the real cost. The prices of the cheapest devices were overestimated, while the costs of the most expensive ones were underestimated. In multivariate analysis, cost less than50 euros [OR = 3.2; CI 95%(1.6-6.3)], professional experience <10 years [OR = 1.5; CI 95%(1.1-2.1)], being a medical student [OR = 2.0; CI 95%(1.3-3.0)], and working in a university affiliated hospital [OR = 0.6; CI 95%(0.4-0.9)] were associated with an incorrect estimation.

CONCLUSIONS

ICU's HCWs have a poor knowledge of the price of devices they regularly use for the care of their patients.

Can a simple 'cost-awareness' campaign for laparoscopic hysterectomy change the use and costs of disposable surgical supplies? Pre-post non-controlled study

OBJECTIVES

Does a cost-awareness campaign for gynaecologists lead to a change in use and costs of disposable surgical supplies for laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) without increasing hospital utilisation measures (operating room (OR) time or hospital length of stay (LOS))?

DESIGN

Pre-post non-controlled study. The OR database was used to identify relevant cases before and after the cost-awareness intervention, and provided information on quantity of each supply item, operative details and LOS.

SETTING

Lois Hole Hospital for Women, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

12 laparoscopic trained gynaecologists (7 female, 5 male) participated in both phases of the study. Eligible surgical cases were all LH cases for any indication for women aged ≥18 years. 201 cases were undertaken before the intervention (2011-2013) and 229 cases after the intervention (2016-2017).

INTERVENTION

The cost-awareness intervention for gynaecologists included site meetings and rounds providing information on costs of disposable and reusable instruments, a full day skills lab, OR posters about cost and effectiveness of disposable and reusable surgical supplies and demonstrations of reusable equipment (2015-2016).

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

Disposable supplies costs per case (standardised for 2016 unit costs).

RESULTS

There was a significant (p<0.05) reduction (unadjusted) in disposable supplies cost per case for LH between cases before and after the intervention: from $C1073, SD 281, to $C943 SD 209. Regression analysis found that the adjusted cost per case after the intervention was $C116 lower than before the intervention (95% CI -160 to -71). Neither OR time nor hospital LOS differed significantly between cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that cost-awareness campaigns may be associated with reduction in the cost of surgery for LH. However, many other factors may have contributed to this cost reduction, possibly including other local initiatives to reduce costs and emerging evidence indicating lack of effectiveness of some surgical practices.

Surgical instrument standardization - A pilot cost consciousness curriculum for surgery residents

INTRODUCTION

Surgical cost is astronomical in the US and instrument standardization is one potential mechanism for cost savings. This study describes a core competency based, multidisciplinary curriculum and evaluates resident attitudes towards operating room equipment standardization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

As part of a quality improvement initiative, surgery residents participated in an hour-long mixed curriculum consisting of brief didactics and small group exercises. Participants developed an equipment standardization plan for laparoscopic appendectomy and cholecystectomy. Participants also completed surveys to assess their attitudes towards 11 potential barriers to implementation as "improves, no change, or worsens".

RESULTS

Fifteen general surgery residents participated. In general, participants felt that standardization improves or does not change metrics including surgeon autonomy, resident training experience, and patient safety.

CONCLUSION

Our pilot curriculum addresses a gap in resident education about surgical cost. Residents generally regard equipment standardization as either improving or not changing hospital metrics.

Cost awareness in urology: A nationwide survey

Introduction:

In the current economic climate with continuous expenditure reviews and financial constraints, clinicians should remain conscious of making cost-effective choices on consumables and medications. In this survey, we evaluated the cost awareness amongst UK urologists. This is an observational study in which urology clinicians were asked to estimate the cost of 10 commonly used medications and consumables in urology by completing a questionnaire.

Methodology:

The survey was primarily conducted at the BAUS Annual Meeting 2017 with subsequent responders at local hospitals and urological courses. The costs of consumables and medications were verified with the relevant companies and the 73rd edition of the British National Formulary.

Result:

There were 139 responders from across the UK (46 consultants, 64 training registrars, 13 trust grades doctors and 16 senior house officers (SHOs)). In total, 16 and 60% of all estimates were within ± 25% and ± 100% of the true cost of the items respectively. Approximately 97.1, 95.7 and 97.1% overestimated the cost of a 14Ch urethral catheter, Ciprofloxacin and Sildenafil, respectively; while 78.4 and 84.9% of responders underestimated the cost of a JJ ureteric stent and Solifenacin, respectively. On multivariate analysis, SHOs significantly overestimated the cost of urethral catheters, suprapubic catheterization kits and JJ ureteric stents compared to other clinician grades.

Conclusion:

Cost awareness among UK urologists is poor. Expensive items (e.g. JJ ureteric stent, Solifenacin) tend to be underestimated while inexpensive items (e.g. catheter, Ciprofloxacin, Sildenafil) tend to be overestimated. This lack of appreciation of value may have an impact on drug and consumable expenditure.

Level of Evidence:

Level 3

Operating Room Supply Cost Awareness: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Introduction

We assessed surgeon knowledge of commonly used instruments and disposable items and described attitudes toward incorporating cost data into daily practice.

Methods

An electronic, e-mail based survey was distributed to faculty and trainees in the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Department of Urology. The 26-question survey assessed opinions regarding general operating room supply cost information and specific costs of 10 supplies used for laparoscopic nephrectomy. A response was considered accurate when it fell within 50% of the actual cost.

Results

The response rate was 71% among faculty (13) and 90% among trainees (17). Overall 55% of faculty and 82% of trainees considered their knowledge of costs "fair" or "poor." The overall accuracy of cost estimation for 10 commonly used supply items was 27% (SD ± 45%), with no significant difference between trainees and faculty (p=0.70). Accuracy was not associated with self-reported cost knowledge (p=0.25) or number of laparoscopic nephrectomies performed (p=0.47). Of the faculty 33% and of the trainees 41% reported that having more knowledge of costs would motivate them to decrease their operating room supply costs, and 42% of faculty raised the idea of an incentive program. Overall 75% of study participants believe that there is "too little" or "not enough" emphasis placed on cost awareness.

Conclusions

Trainees and faculty generally have poor knowledge of operating room supply costs. In our academic setting we noted an interest among faculty and residents to make cost data more accessible. These data would provide an opportunity for surgeons to act as cost arbiters in the operating room.

Surgeons and Surgical Trainees Underestimate the Total Charges and Reimbursements Associated With Commonly Performed General Surgery Procedures✰

INTRODUCTION

Surgical care contributes significantly to the fiscal challenges facing the US health care system. Multiple studies have demonstrated surgeons' lack of awareness of the costs associated with individual portions of surgical care, namely operating room supplies. We sought to assess surgeon and trainee awareness of the comprehensive charges and reimbursements associated with procedures they perform.

METHODS

We administered a voluntary anonymous survey to attending surgeons, general surgery residents, and fourth-year medical students who applied to general surgery residencies. We compared charge and reimbursement estimates for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open inguinal hernia repair to the actual values. Additionally, we assessed the importance placed on the financial aspects of surgical care.

RESULTS

We had an overall response rate of 94% (n = 45). A majority of attendings, residents, and medical students underestimated charges and reimbursements for open inguinal hernia repair and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There was no significant difference in the accuracy of charge or reimbursement estimates between attendings, residents, and students for herniorrhaphy or cholecystectomy (Charge: hernia p = 0.08, cholecystectomy p = 0.30; Reimbursement: hernia p = 0.47, cholecystectomy p = 0.89). Years of training as an attending or resident did not predict accuracy of charge or reimbursement estimates for hernia repair or cholecystectomy (p > 0.3 for all regressions). The median (interquartile range) charge estimate for inguinal hernia repair was -$5914 (-$7914 to -$2914) from the actual charge, 45.8% of the true value, and the median reimbursement estimate was -$4519 (-$5369 to -$1218) from actual reimbursement, 27.3% of the true value. The median charge estimate for cholecystectomy was -$5734 (-$8733 to +$1266) from the actual charge, 58.3% of the true value, and the median reimbursement estimate was -$4847 (-$6847 to +$153) from actual reimbursement, 38.2% of the true value.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons and their trainees underestimate the charges and reimbursements associated with commonly performed procedures.

Awareness of surgical expenditure amongst UK trainees and consultants: A questionnaire study

INTRODUCTION

Limited knowledge of surgical device and service costs restricts a surgeon's ability to make cost efficient choices and contribute to the efficiency savings required by the NHS to reduce the financial deficit. This study aims to assess how aware surgeons are of surgical equipment and regularly used services.

METHODS

A single sided hard copy questionnaire asking for the estimate cost of 24 surgical devices/services was handed out to individuals at two separate UK annual conferences. Items and services which are regularly used and/or clinically significant were selected and, where possible, alternatives to those items were included for comparison. Participants were also asked for their grade and specialty. An estimate was deemed correct if it was within 20% of the actual cost. Planned subgroup analyses for grade and specialty were performed.

RESULTS

The 143 participants consisted of 23 (16%) consultants, 39 (27%) registrars, 33 (23%) SHOs and 48 (34%) foundation doctors. Of the 95 participants who were SHO grade or more senior, 67 (71%) work within general surgery. Across all items, only 9.6% of estimates were correct. There was no statistically significant difference between training levels (consultant 11.5%, registrar 10.1%, SHO 8.6%, foundation 8.9%; p = 0.253). Participants were significantly less successful in correctly estimating the cost of high value (>£150 [USD $198; EUR €175]) items (8.5% vs. 11.1%); p = 0.011, and the cost of devices as compared to the cost of services (7.4% vs. 15.0%); p = 0.001.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons across all grades and specialties have poor knowledge of device and service costs. It is important that this improves in order to allow surgeons to make a meaningful contribution to NHS efficiency savings by making informed decisions about their use of devices and services.

Surgical Equipment Price Awareness Amongst Obstetrician-Gynecologists

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Physicians typically have little information of surgical device pricing, although this trend has not been studied in the field of obstetrics and gynecology. We therefore aimed to determine how accurately obstetrician-gynecologists estimate surgical device prices, and to identify factors associated with accuracy.

METHODS

An anonymous survey was emailed to all obstetrician-gynecologist attendings, fellows, and residents at 3 teaching hospitals in a single healthcare system in Arizona. We obtained demographic data, perceptions of price transparency and self-rated price knowledge, and price estimates for 31 surgical devices.

RESULTS

After participants provided consent and demographics, they then estimated the purchasing price of 31 devices. We defined price accuracy as being within ±10% of the hospital's purchasing price. Fifty-six of the 170 (32.9%) invitees completed the survey and 48 (28.2%) provided price estimates. On average, participants identified 1.9 items correctly (6.1%; range, 0-7 items) out of 31 with no difference in accuracy based on seniority, surgical volume, physician reimbursement structure, nor subspecialty practice-focus. All (100%) respondents felt pricing should be transparent, and only 1.8% felt it is at least somewhat transparent.

CONCLUSION

We found that price-estimate accuracy was very low and had no association with any of the demographics. Also notable was the perception that pricing is not transparent despite a unanimous desire for transparency. Although physicians reported a preference for using less-expensive surgical devices, we conclude that physicians are unequipped to make cost-conscious decisions highlighting a large potential for education.

Gelatinous foam needle tract embolization during CT guided percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy: A practical and cost effective approach in the community hospital setting

Gelatinous foam (GelFoam, Pfizer, Inc, New York, NY) is a low cost, readily available material with a wide range of procedural applications. A novel implementation during computed tomography (CT) guided percutaneous lung biopsy to reduce the rates of pneumothorax leading to further intervention with chest tube placement. We present the imaging and outcome of a patient undergoing this procedure in a community hospital setting.

Effects of a Surgical Receipt Program on the Supply Costs of Five General Surgery Procedures

BACKGROUND

Surgical supplies occupy a large portion of health care expenditures but is often under the surgeon's control. We sought to assess whether an automated, surgeon-directed, cost feedback system can decrease supply expenditures for five common general surgery procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An automated "surgical receipt" detailing intraoperative supply costs was generated and emailed to surgeons after each case. We compared the median cost per case for 18 mo before and after implementation of the surgical receipt. We controlled for price fluctuations by applying common per-unit prices in both periods. We also compared the incision time, case length booking accuracy, length of stay, and postoperative occurrences.

RESULTS

Median costs decreased significantly for open inguinal hernia ($433.45 to $385.49, P < 0.001), laparoscopic cholecystectomy ($886.77 to $816.13, P = 0.002), and thyroidectomy ($861.21 to $825.90, P = 0.034). Median costs were unchanged for laparoscopic appendectomy and increased significantly for lumpectomy ($325.67 to $420.53, P < 0.001). There was an increase in incision-to-closure minutes for open inguinal hernia (71 to 75 min, P < 0.001) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (75 to 96 min, P < 0.001), but a decrease in thyroidectomy (79 to 73 min, P < 0.001). There was an increase in booking accuracy for laparoscopic appendectomy (38.6% to 55.0%, P = 0.001) and thyroidectomy (32.5% to 48.1%, P = 0.001). There were no differences in postoperative occurrence rates and length of stay duration.

CONCLUSIONS

An automated surgeon-directed surgical receipt may be a useful tool to decrease supply costs for certain procedures. However, curtailing surgical supply costs with surgeon-directed cost feedback alone is challenging and a multimodal approach may be necessary.

Cost of open and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: surgeon perceptions versus the reality of hospital spending

BACKGROUND

Rising health care costs have led to increasing focus on cost containment and accountability from health care providers. We sought to explore surgeon awareness of supply costs for open and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

METHODS

Surveys were sent in 2015 to surgeons at 8 academic hospitals in Toronto who performed distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Respondents were asked to estimate the total cost, type and number of disposable equipment pieces required to perform open and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. We determined the accuracy of estimates through comparisons with procedural invoices for distal gastrectomy performed between Jan. 1, 2011, and Dec. 31, 2015. All values are in 2015 Canadian dollars.

RESULTS

Of the 53 surveys sent out, 12 were completed (response rate 23%). Surgeon estimates of total supply costs ranged from $500 to $3000 and from $1500 to $5000 for open and laparoscopic cases, respectively. Estimated supply costs for requested equipment ranged from $464 to $2055 for open cases and from $1870 to $2960 for laparoscopic cases. Invoices for actual equipment yielded a mean of $821 (standard deviation $543) (range $89-$2613) for open cases and $2678 (standard deviation $958) (range $835-$4102) for laparoscopic cases. Estimates of total cost were within 25% of the median invoice total in 1 response (9%) for open cases and 3 (27%) of those for laparoscopic cases.

CONCLUSION

Respondents failed to accurately estimate equipment costs. The variation in true total costs and estimates of supply costs represents an opportunity for intraoperative cost minimization, efficient equipment selection and value-based purchasing arrangements.

Creating Value in Plastic Surgery

Value is defined as the worth, utility, or importance something holds. It can be derived from a variety of goods and services and is relative to a given industry or population. This article will discuss elements of plastic surgery that hold value as to how it pertains to the key players in a medical transaction. It will also discuss strategies for identifying and generating value. Roles of the different members in a plastic surgery transaction were analyzed, specifically the patient, the surgeon, and the facility. Different factors that generated value for all parties were identified throughout the literature. Factors identified that created value included the following: the surgeon's knowledge, experience, and decision-making ability; and technical skill/speed, restoration of life, restoration of form and function, restoration of psychological deficit, instant surgical results, convenience of access, outcomes, cost accounting, research, compassion, and bedside manner. Plastic surgeons can gear their practice to provide the system and their patients with services that hold value. We present several factors that can generate value for the patient, surgeon, and hospital system.

Improving the value of care for appendectomy through an individual surgeon-specific approach

PURPOSE

Standardized care via a unified surgeon preference card for pediatric appendectomy can result in significant cost reduction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of cost and outcome feedback to surgeons on value of care in an environment reluctant to adopt a standardized surgeon preference card.

METHODS

Prospective observational study comparing operating room (OR) supply costs and patient outcomes for appendectomy in children with 6-month observation periods both before and after intervention. The intervention was real-time feedback of OR supply cost data to individual surgeons via automated dashboards and monthly reports.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixteen children underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for non-perforated appendicitis (110 pre-intervention and 106 post-intervention). Median supply cost significantly decreased after intervention: $884 (IQR $705-$1025) to $388 (IQR $182-$776), p<0.001. No significant change was detected in median OR duration (47min [IQR 36-63] to 50min [IQR 38-64], p=0.520) or adverse events (1 [0.9%] to 6 [4.7%], p=0.062). OR supply costs for individual surgeons significantly decreased during the intervention period for 6 of 8 surgeons (87.5%).

CONCLUSION

Approaching value measurement with a surgeon-specific (rather than group-wide) approach can reduce OR supply costs while maintaining excellent clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.