1
|
Azar SS, Shires CB, Dewan K, Chhetri DK. Total tracheoesophageal puncture failure: A scoping review of patient characteristics and etiologies. Head Neck 2024. [PMID: 39077940 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2024] [Revised: 07/15/2024] [Accepted: 07/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Tracheoesophageal prosthesis (TEP) is a common method for post-laryngectomy speech rehabilitation. Despite its common use, some patients ultimately fail TEP rehabilitation. TEP dysfunction negatively affects quality of life due to poor voice quality and need for repeated interventions to restore TEP function. Occasionally, voice rehabilitation with TEP is completely unsuccessful. We performed a scoping review to characterize the main reasons for total TEP failure, in hopes of guiding selection of optimal TEP candidates. STUDY DESIGN Scoping review using PubMed of all English language articles from 1990 to 2020 addressing causes of TEP failure. METHODS This scoping review followed the population, intervention, comparison, outcome and study (PICOS) guidelines. Total TEP failure was defined as complete loss or abandonment of TEP voice or tract. A comprehensive search strategy using PubMed's MeSH subject headings and keywords was created. Causes and rates of failure were reviewed. RESULTS Among 544 peer-reviewed journal articles reviewed for inclusion. Seventy articles met inclusion criteria, resulting in a total of 4928 TEP voice restoration patients for analysis. 15.2% of these patients had total TEP failure. The most common reasons for failure were dissatisfaction with voice (26.3%), leakage (17.9%), inadequate patient motivation (14.7%), comorbidities (14.2%), stoma problems (11.6%), and abandonment of TEP after dislodgement (10.6%). CONCLUSION Common reasons for TEP failure included voice dissatisfaction, leakage, lack of patient motivation, patient comorbidities, and stoma problems. These factors should be considered when selecting candidates for TEP voice restoration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaghauyegh S Azar
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Karuna Dewan
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Louisiana State University, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Dinesh K Chhetri
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stanisce L, McGlone M, Koshkareva Y, Swendseid B, Lawrence I, Kubicek GJ, Gaughan JP, Solomon DH, Ahmad N. Socioeconomic Influence on Speech Rehabilitation After Total Laryngectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 169:1499-1505. [PMID: 37422889 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Speech rehabilitation following a total laryngectomy significantly impacts the quality of life. Indwelling prosthetic voice restoration provides optimal outcomes; however, the long-term maintenance of these devices carries considerable financial costs, which are not universally covered by insurance. This investigation aimed to analyze associations between socioeconomic factors and outcomes in postlaryngectomy speech rehabilitation. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING Academic tertiary-care center from May 2014 to September 2021. METHODS In patients undergoing total laryngectomy, the incidence of tracheoesophageal puncture with indwelling vocal prostheses (TEP-VP) placement within the first postoperative year was compared among household income, demographic factors, and disease characteristics. Functional and maintenance outcomes served as secondary endpoints. RESULTS Seventy-seven patients were included. Forty-five (58%) underwent indwelling TEP-VP (41 primaries). Eighty-nine percent of patients with annual incomes greater than $50k underwent TEP-VP compared to only 35% with incomes less than $50k/year. TEP-VP was performed in 85% of patients with commercial insurance, 70% with Medicare, 42% with Medicaid, and 0% with no insurance. On multivariate analysis, annual household incomes greater than $50k were predicted for TEP-VP placement (odds ratio: 12.7 [2.45-65.8], p = .002). The utilization of postoperative speech therapy and functional communication outcomes were similar among socioeconomic groups. Twelve patients were unable to afford supplies within the first year, with differences noted among insurance (p = .015) and income status (p = .003). CONCLUSION Disparities in vocal and speech rehabilitation following laryngectomy may disproportionally affect underserved patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke Stanisce
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| | - Mick McGlone
- Cooper Medical School at Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| | - Yekaterina Koshkareva
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey, USA
- Cooper Medical School at Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, USA
- MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper, Head and Neck Cancer Center, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| | - Brian Swendseid
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey, USA
- Cooper Medical School at Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, USA
- MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper, Head and Neck Cancer Center, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| | - Ian Lawrence
- MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper, Head and Neck Cancer Center, Camden, New Jersey, USA
- Division of Speech and Language Pathology, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| | - Gregory J Kubicek
- Cooper Medical School at Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, USA
- MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper, Head and Neck Cancer Center, Camden, New Jersey, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| | - John P Gaughan
- Cooper Research Institute, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| | - Donald H Solomon
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey, USA
- Cooper Medical School at Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| | - Nadir Ahmad
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Cooper University Health Care, Camden, New Jersey, USA
- Cooper Medical School at Rowan University, Camden, New Jersey, USA
- MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper, Head and Neck Cancer Center, Camden, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McDermott JD, Amini A, Molina E, Stokes WA, Karam SD. Treatment outcomes and cost comparisons for older adults with T4 laryngeal squamous cell cancer. Head Neck 2023; 45:664-674. [PMID: 36563300 PMCID: PMC10626713 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate treatment modalities of T4 larynx cancer in older adults using SEER-Medicare. METHODS The database was queried for patients aged 66 and older with nonmetastatic T4 laryngeal squamous cell cancer from 2006 to 2015. Treatment modalities compared were surgery plus chemoradiation (SCR), surgery plus radiation (SR), chemoradiation (CR), surgery (S), and radiation (R). Multivariate analysis and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to explore the relationship of treatment modality and survival. Total cancer-related costs were calculated. RESULTS A total of 438 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients receiving CR or SR had similar CSS to SCR (HR 1.36 and HR 1.24, respectively). Those receiving S (HR 2.00) or R (HR 2.41) had significantly worse CSS. Similar findings were observed for OS. Cancer care-related costs were not significantly different but highest in SCR ($162215) and lowest in R ($121421). CONCLUSION Older patients with T4 larynx cancer had similar survival rates when treated with CR, SR, and SCR. Average total health care costs were not significantly different between modalities. Patients not eligible for triple-modality could consider these other treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica D McDermott
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Arya Amini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA
| | - Elizabeth Molina
- Department of Health Systems, Management, and Policy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - William A Stokes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sana D Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Massaro N, Verro B, Greco G, Chianetta E, D'Ecclesia A, Saraniti C. Quality of Life with Voice Prosthesis after Total Laryngectomy. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY 2021; 33:301-309. [PMID: 34692577 PMCID: PMC8507945 DOI: 10.22038/ijorl.2021.53724.2832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The loss of voice after total laryngectomy is one of the main impairments in personal and social life. In order to prevent potential psycho-social consequences in the patient and his family, the restoration of phonatory function is the main objective of post-laryngectomy rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to assess quality of life in patients who received prosthetic voice after total laryngectomy. Materials and Methods Over a one-year period, 51 patients with voice prostheses after total laryngectomy were recruited. 32 patients (62.74%) were administered radiation therapy and 9 patients (17.64%) underwent to surgical reconstruction with flaps. Each patient was administered the VHI-10 and V-RQOL self-assessment questionnaires. Results The study showed that vocal restoration with voice prosthesis allows patients to recover a significant degree of quality of life after total laryngectomy. The average score on the V-RQOL questionnaire was 75.9 and on the VHI-10 questionnaire was 13.5. It has not been shown a statistically significant correlation between quality of life after tracheoesophageal prosthesis and radiation therapy, chemotherapy or reconstruction flaps. Younger patients showed, on average, a higher score at V-RQOL. These results allow to state that, after prosthetic rehabilitation, at least 75% of patients experienced an increase in quality of life. Moreover, the prosthetic technique (primary vs secondary) does not affect the long-term outcome and radiotherapy, chemotherapy or reconstruction flaps are not absolute contraindications to rehabilitation with voice prosthesis. Conclusion After total laryngectomy, rehabilitation with tracheoesophageal prosthesis is a satisfactory choice to restore the patient's ability to communicate verbally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Massaro
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo (PA) Italy
| | - Barbara Verro
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo (PA) Italy
| | - Giuseppe Greco
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo (PA) Italy
| | - Enzo Chianetta
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo (PA) Italy
| | - Aurelio D'Ecclesia
- ENT and Maxillo-Facial Clinic, IRCSS - Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza - San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia (FG), Italy
| | - Carmelo Saraniti
- Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostic, University of Palermo, Palermo (PA) Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bozec A, Boscagli M, Serris M, Chamorey E, Dassonville O, Poissonnet G, Culié D, Scheller B, Benezery K, Gal J. Long-term functional and quality of life outcomes in laryngectomized patients after successful voice restoration using tracheoesophageal prostheses. Surg Oncol 2021; 38:101580. [PMID: 33862577 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess long-term functional and quality of life (QoL) outcomes and their predictive factors in laryngectomized patients after successful voice restoration using tracheoesophageal prostheses (TEP). METHODS This cross-sectional study was conducted in alive and disease-free patients at least 1 year after total laryngectomy ± partial pharyngectomy. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core (QLQ-C30) and Head and Neck Cancer (QLQ-H&N35) QoL questionnaires, the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10) questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The level of dysphagia was evaluated using the Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI) and the Dysphagia Outcomes and Severity Scale (DOSS). Predictive factors of these clinical outcomes were determined in univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS A total of 48 patients were included in this study. Long-term QoL and functioning scales scores were all superior to 70%. Main persistent symptoms were fatigue, dyspnea, senses, speech and coughing problems. A DOSS score ≥6, indicating normal/subnormal swallowing function, and a VHI-10 score ≤20, representing light to medium voice disorders, were found in at least 75% of patients. An anxiodepressive disorder (HADS global score ≥ 15) was reported by 15 (31%) patients and represented the main predictor of QoL and voice outcomes. A strong correlation was found between VHI-10 and global QoL scores. CONCLUSIONS After successful voice restoration, laryngectomized patients achieved satisfactory QoL and functional outcomes. Psychological distress was the main determinant of long-term QoL and is therefore of critical importance in the multidisciplinary management of laryngectomized patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Bozec
- Institut Universitaire de La Face et du Cou, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
| | - Maxime Boscagli
- Institut Universitaire de La Face et du Cou, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Marilou Serris
- Institut Universitaire de La Face et du Cou, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Emmanuel Chamorey
- Department of Statistics, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Olivier Dassonville
- Institut Universitaire de La Face et du Cou, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Gilles Poissonnet
- Institut Universitaire de La Face et du Cou, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Dorian Culié
- Institut Universitaire de La Face et du Cou, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Boris Scheller
- Institut Universitaire de La Face et du Cou, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Karen Benezery
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Jocelyn Gal
- Department of Statistics, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hoffmann TK. Total Laryngectomy-Still Cutting-Edge? Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1405. [PMID: 33808695 PMCID: PMC8003522 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgical removal of the larynx (total laryngectomy) offers a curative approach to patients with advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal (squamous cell) cancer without distant metastases. Particularly in T4a carcinoma, laryngectomy seems prognostically superior to primary radio(chemo)therapy. Further relevant indications for laryngectomy include massive laryngeal dysfunction associated with aspiration and recurrence after radio(chemo)therapy, resulting in salvage surgery. The surgical procedure including neck dissection is highly standardised and safe. The resulting aphonia can be compensated by functional rehabilitation (e.g., voice prosthesis) associated with a significant quality of life improvement. This article presents an overview of indications, preoperative diagnostics, surgical procedures, including new developments (robotics), possible complications, the choice of adjuvant treatment, alternative therapeutic approaches, rehabilitation and prognosis. In summary, total laryngectomy still represents a relevant surgical procedure in modern head and neck oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas K Hoffmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Hospital, 89070 Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Boyd C, Houghton J, Harrold L, Bond J, Garnett JD, Kraft S. Assessment of Factors Impacting Long-Term Utilization of Tracheoesophageal Speech Among Laryngectomees. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2020; 130:802-809. [PMID: 33242976 DOI: 10.1177/0003489420976145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S) To evaluate complication rate and abandonment rate after tracheoesophageal puncture and to assess factors associated with these outcome measures. METHODS Retrospective review of laryngectomy patients seen at a single academic institution between 1/1/2003 and 12/1/2018. Charts reviewed for demographics, medical comorbidities, tumor characteristics, surgical data, adjuvant treatment history, and complications related to laryngectomy or tracheoesophageal puncture. Complications were divided into minor and major. RESULTS A total of 293 laryngectomees met inclusion criteria. Of these, 69 patients (23.5%) underwent tracheoesophageal puncture. Average follow up was 64.6 months (SD 58.3). Overall laryngectomy complication rate was 43.3%. Overall tracheoesophageal puncture complication rate was 73.9%, with 39.1% of patients having major complications and 34.8% having minor complications only. Total abandonment rate for tracheoesophageal puncture was 34.8%. No associations were seen between tracheoesophageal puncture complication or abandonment rates based on age, gender, race, or insurance status. An increased rate of laryngectomy complications was seen after primary tracheoesophageal puncture (76.5% vs 41.3%, P = .005). CONCLUSION Tracheoesophageal puncture outcomes were similar in patients with varied demographic, medical, and treatment backgrounds. When considering timing, our findings suggest that patients should be counseled on the possibility of increased complication risk after primary tracheoesophageal puncture. In those in whom the surgeon already has concerns about wound healing, it may be prudent to avoid primary tracheoesophageal puncture. The relatively high abandonment rate emphasizes the value of this measure of tracheoesophageal puncture outcome and highlights the need for appropriate patient counseling and prospective studies assessing the decision to abandon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Boyd
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - James Houghton
- University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Logan Harrold
- University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Justin Bond
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - James D Garnett
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| | - Shannon Kraft
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wulff NB, Højager A, Wessel I, Dalton SO, Homøe P. Health-Related Quality of Life Following Total Laryngectomy: A Systematic Review. Laryngoscope 2020; 131:820-831. [PMID: 32866284 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Revised: 06/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Treatment of advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer has shifted from total laryngectomy (TL) toward laryngeal-preserving therapies due to a general perception that TL has a significantly negative impact on the individual's life. However, whether the physical impairments related to TL translate to a reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has not yet been determined. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review was to determine how HRQoL is affected following TL. METHODS Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria were original studies describing quality of life following TL after larynx/hypopharynx cancer using a formally developed patient-reported questionnaire. Study quality assessment was carried out with the tool developed by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. RESULTS Forty-six studies using 12 different questionnaires were included. The majority were cross-sectional (85%), and study quality was rated poor in 30%, fair in 30%, and good in 39% of studies. When comparing results from the four most frequently used questionnaires with normative data, we found that in more than 60% of studies, differences to the reference population were of clinical importance, with only few exceptions. CONCLUSIONS In general, we found that people who received TL have a worse HRQoL than the male normative reference population. However, even though TL patients experience a clinically important difference in many domains when compared with normative data, their burden of symptoms is generally mild. The current review also makes it evident that despite the relatively large number of studies conducted, the strength of evidence remains weak. Laryngoscope, 131:820-831, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nille B Wulff
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Anna Højager
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Irene Wessel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Susanne O Dalton
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark
| | - Preben Homøe
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Current opinions in otolaryngology and head and neck surgery: functional considerations in reconstruction after laryngectomy. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 28:355-364. [PMID: 32796266 DOI: 10.1097/moo.0000000000000645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review reconstruction techniques following total laryngectomy, partial laryngopharyngectomy, and total laryngopharyngectomy with an emphasis on long-term swallow and speech outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS Recent literature has shown that the use of fasciocutaneous free flaps in the reconstruction of laryngectomy defects may lead to improved speech and swallow outcomes as compared with regional or free musculocutaneous flaps. Radial forearm and anterolateral thigh are the most often used fasciocutaneous free flaps, with similar speech and swallow outcomes. Primary closure with myofascial flap onlay yields similar speech and swallow results to fasciocutaneous flaps following laryngectomy that spares sufficient pharyngeal mucosa. SUMMARY Whenever reconstructing a salvage laryngectomy defect or a primary laryngectomy defect with mucosal deficiency, current evidence suggests that a fasciocutaneous free flap used to augment pharyngeal volume both improves fistula rates as well as long-term speech and swallow outcomes. When sufficient pharyngeal mucosa is present, myofascial onlay can be considered as well.
Collapse
|
10
|
Zaga CJ, Pandian V, Brodsky MB, Wallace S, Cameron TS, Chao C, Orloff LA, Atkins NE, McGrath BA, Lazarus CL, Vogel AP, Brenner MJ. Speech-Language Pathology Guidance for Tracheostomy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An International Multidisciplinary Perspective. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2020; 29:1320-1334. [PMID: 32525695 DOI: 10.1044/2020_ajslp-20-00089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Purpose As the COVID-19 pandemic has unfolded, there has been growing recognition of risks to frontline health care workers. When caring for patients with tracheostomy, speech-language pathologists have significant exposure to mucosal surfaces, secretions, and aerosols that may harbor the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This tutorial provides guidance on practices for safely performing patient evaluation and procedures, thereby reducing risk of infection. Method Data were collated through review of literature, guidelines, and consensus statements relating to COVID-19 and similar high-consequent infections, with a focus on mitigating risk of transmission to health care workers. Particular emphasis was placed on speech-language pathologists, nurses, and other allied health professionals. A multinational interdisciplinary team then analyzed findings, arriving at recommendations through consensus via electronic communications and video conference. Results Reports of transmission of infection to health care workers in the current COVID-19 pandemic and previous outbreaks substantiate the need for safe practices. Many procedures routinely performed by speech-language pathologists have a significant risk of infection due to aerosol generation. COVID-19 testing can inform level of protective equipment, and meticulous hygiene can stem spread of nosocomial infection. Modifications to standard clinical practice in tracheostomy are often required. Personal protective equipment, including either powered air-purifying respirator or N95 mask, gloves, goggles, and gown, are needed when performing aerosol-generating procedures in patients with known or suspected COVID-19 infection. Conclusions Speech-language pathologists are often called on to assist in the care of patients with tracheostomy and known or suspected COVID-19 infection. Appropriate care of these patients is predicated on maintaining the health and safety of the health care team. Careful adherence to best practices can significantly reduce risk of infectious transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charissa J Zaga
- Department of Speech Pathology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Neuroscience of Speech, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Tracheostomy Review and Management Service, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vinciya Pandian
- Department of Nursing Faculty, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Research Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Martin B Brodsky
- Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery (OACIS) Research Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Sarah Wallace
- Department of Speech Voice and Swallowing, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Tanis S Cameron
- Tracheostomy Review and Management Service, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Caroline Chao
- Tracheostomy Review and Management Service, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Physiotherapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lisa Ann Orloff
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA
| | - Naomi E Atkins
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Brendan A McGrath
- Anaesthetics & Intensive Care Medicine, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Cathy L Lazarus
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Adam P Vogel
- Centre for Neuroscience of Speech, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Neurodegeneration, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen, Germany
- Redenlab, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael J Brenner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bozec A, Culié D, Poissonnet G, Dassonville O. Current Role of Total Laryngectomy in the Era of Organ Preservation. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12030584. [PMID: 32138168 PMCID: PMC7139381 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12030584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
In this article, we aimed to discuss the role of total laryngectomy (TL) in the management of patients with larynx cancer (LC) in the era of organ preservation. Before the 1990s, TL followed by radiotherapy (RT) was the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced LC. Over the last 30 years, various types of larynx preservation (LP) programs associating induction or concurrent chemotherapy (CT) with RT have been developed, with the aim of treating locally advanced LC patients while preserving the larynx and its functions. Overall, more than two-thirds of patients included in a LP program will not require total laryngectomy (TL) and will preserve a functional larynx. However, despite these advances, the larynx is the only tumor site in the upper aero-digestive tract for which prognosis has not improved during recent decades. Indeed, none of these LP protocols have shown any survival advantage compared to primary radical surgery, and it appears that certain LC patients do not benefit from an LP program. This is the case for patients with T4a LC (extra-laryngeal tumor extension through the thyroid cartilage) or with poor pretreatment laryngeal function and for whom primary TL is still the preferred therapeutic option. Moreover, TL is the standard salvage therapy for patients with recurrent tumor after an LP protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Bozec
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +0033-4-92-03-17-66; Fax: +0033-4-92-03-17-64
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Allegra E, La Mantia I, Bianco MR, Drago GD, Le Fosse MC, Azzolina A, Grillo C, Saita V. Verbal performance of total laryngectomized patients rehabilitated with esophageal speech and tracheoesophageal speech: impacts on patient quality of life. Psychol Res Behav Manag 2019; 12:675-681. [PMID: 31616193 PMCID: PMC6699587 DOI: 10.2147/prbm.s212793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Total laryngectomy has important psychophysical and social consequences for patients’ quality of life because of the functional changes resulting from the removal of the larynx. Voice deprivation is perhaps the most relevant limiting factor in social relationships, increasing feelings of solitude and tending to drive individuals into social isolation. Multiple voice rehabilitation methods after total laryngectomy are available. This study aimed to determine the acoustic quality of the rehabilitated voice achieved with esophageal speech (ES) and tracheoesophageal speech (TES), and acoustic quality impacts on patients’ perceptions of their quality of life. Materials and methods The patient inclusion criterion was the completion of a speech rehabilitation course with ES or TES at least 6 months after total laryngectomy. The voice acoustic analysis was carried out automatically by using the Multidimensional Voice Program. The following parameters were extracted: fundamental frequency (F0), Jitter% (Jitt), Shimmer% (Shim), and noise-to-harmonic ratio (NHR). Subjective voice evaluation was performed by using the following questionnaires: Voice Handicap Index (VHI), Voice-related Quality of Life (V-RQOL), and Voice Performance Questionnaire (VPQ). Results The acoustic analysis showed a difference between ES and TES patients on all acoustic parameters; this difference was significant for F0 (133.09±2.4 and 119±3.3, respectively; p<0.001), NHR (0.43±0.21 and 0.31±0.14, respectively; p=0.02), and maximum phonation time (2.02±038 s and 10.64±0.28 s, respectively; p=0.01. Regarding patient-related outcomes, TES correlated with better total scores compared with ES; however, the differences in the total scores on the VHI (p=0.09), V-RQOL (p=0.39), and VPQ (p=0.52) were not statistically significant. Conclusion The rehabilitation of laryngectomized patients must be addressed by a multidisciplinary team that considers the personalities, personal needs, and relational conditions of individual patients in order to determine and apply the phonatory rehabilitation method most suitable for achieving a better quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenia Allegra
- Otolaryngology, Department of Health Science, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Ignazio La Mantia
- Otolaryngology, "G.F Ingrassia" Department, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Maria Rita Bianco
- Otolaryngology, Department of Health Science, University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | | | | | - Alfio Azzolina
- Otolaryngology Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Calogero Grillo
- Otolaryngology, "G.F Ingrassia" Department, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Saita
- Otolaryngology Unit, Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|