Is EAT-10 Useful to Assess Swallowing during the Chemo-Radiotherapy Phase in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer? A Pilot Study

Relationship Between Subjective Questionnaires and Videofluoroscopy of Dysphagia Evaluation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Early detection of dysphagia is important for preventing aspiration pneumonia. Although videofluoroscopy is currently the primary diagnostic tool for dysphagia, access to this tool may be limited because of radiation exposure risk, high cost, and other factors.

PURPOSE

In this study, a meta-analysis was used to determine the strength of the correlation between dysphagia detection outcomes obtained using subjective questionnaires and videofluoroscopy.

METHODS

The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for original articles up to December 2022. Studies published in English that used cross-sectional designs to assess the correlation between subjective questionnaires and videofluoroscopy were considered eligible for inclusion. The search terms used included "dysphagia," "questionnaire," and "videofluoroscopy." Two reviewers critically appraised and extracted the correlation coefficient r values. In addition, a random-effects meta-analysis was conducted. The Q statistic was used to assess the heterogeneity among the included studies. Publication bias was checked using the funnel plot and Egger's tests. Multilevel analysis was used to determine sensitivity to consider within-study correlations. In addition, subgroup analyses were conducted based on type of questionnaire, head and neck cancer, and English-speaking regions.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included five studies and 856 patients using the Eating Assessment Tool-10 and one study and 27 patients using the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire. The results of the random-effects meta-analysis showed a moderate relationship between the subjective questionnaires and videofluoroscopy ( r = .35, 95% CI [0.20, 0.48]). Similar results were also obtained using multilevel analysis ( r = .34, 95% CI [0.25, 0.42]). No publication bias was found for any of the studies ( p = .88). In the subgroup analyses, a moderate relationship between Eating Assessment Tool-10 and videofluoroscopy ( r = .31, 95% CI [0.19, 0.42]) and an ultrahigh relationship between Sydney Swallow Questionnaire and video-fluoroscopy ( r = .74, 95% CI [0.50, 0.87]) were found. Furthermore, moderate associations were observed within each head and neck cancer and English-speaking regions subgroup. However, no significant differences were found between these two subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate the subjective questionnaires considered in this study share a moderate relationship with videofluoroscopy. Subjective questionnaires may be used as an auxiliary tool by nurses and homecare givers for the early assessment of dysphagia risk in patients.

Surface Electromyographic Activity of the Masseter Muscle During Regular and Effortful Saliva Swallows: A Preliminary Study

Biofeedback is a critical component in motor learning of new, complex behaviors such as modifications to swallowing. Surface electromyography (sEMG) is a commonly employed biofeedback tool in swallowing management to assess muscle activity patterns, determine amplitude and duration of swallowing, and train swallowing strategies such as the effortful swallow (EFS) maneuver. The EFS can potentially change multiple physiological components of the swallowing process such as pressure generation and movement of biomechanical structures. The purposes of this study were to determine whether the masseter muscle could differentiate a normal swallow (NS) from an EFS and whether there was a relationship between perceived muscle effort used to swallow and objective measures of muscle activity. Twenty healthy young adults participated in this study. Masseter sEMG peak amplitude and duration were measured across five regular saliva swallows and five effortful saliva swallows. Additionally, participants rated their perceived swallowing effort using a visual analog scale (VAS). Two swallowing conditions, NSs and EFSs were compared with hierarchical models, and repeated measures correlation was used to determine the relationships between the VAS and sEMG peak amplitude. Participants produced swallows with greater masseter sEMG peak amplitude and duration during the EFS. Moreover, a positive correlation was identified between perceived swallowing effort and masseter sEMG peak amplitude. These findings support the potential use of the masseter muscle to differentiate NSs from EFSs and implement the VAS during therapy for tracking patients' performance, particularly in settings with limited access to sEMG.

Screening oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with head and neck cancer in a radiation oncology department

Background

Oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) occurs in up to 40% of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients before treatment and remains a common symptom (23-60%) after oncological treatments, leading to several consequences. Early detection is essential for effective swallowing-rehabilitation and nutritional-support. The increased radiosensitivity of tumors associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) and advances in imaging techniques have stimulated research into deintensified strategies to minimize radiotherapy (RT) side effects. The purposes of the study are to establish the percentage of patients with HNC who are candidates to RT who are at risk of dysphagia [Eating Assessment Tool (EAT) score ≥ 3], determine if tumor location and previous surgery were related to a higher risk of dysphagia and if patients suffering severe toxicity during cancer therapy are at greater risk of posttreatment-dysphagia.

Materials and methods

Patients diagnosed of HNC who were referred to RT treatment at our Radiation Oncology Department were prospectively included. Questionnaire EAT-10 was filled in the first assessment used as a screening tool and repeated one month after treatment. Treatment toxicity was established according to common toxicity criteria adverse effects (CTCAE4.03).

Results

From November 2019 to January 2021, 72 patients were included. All completed pretreatment EAT-10 questionnaire. The mean (SD) score of the pretreatment EAT-10 was 7.26 ± 11.19 and 43.1% were at dysphagia risk. Patients with tumors located in the oral cavity, oropharynx and those that had received surgery prior to RT had higher risk than the rest of locations or those who had not previous surgery (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). After oncological treatment 95.83% completed EAT-10 post-treatment and 45,6% showed positive EAT-10 score.

Conclusions

Patients with tumors in the oral cavity or oropharynx, presenting in advanced stage, and who previously received surgery are at higher risk of developing dysphagia. The EAT-10 is a simple tool that can help us identify those patients and refer them for an intensive evaluation to reduce dysphagia-consequences.

[Pre-treatment dysphagia in head-and-neck cancer patients]

BACKGROUND

The swallowing and nutritional status of head-and-neck cancer patients after oncological therapy have been extensively researched. However, the same topics are seldom scrutinized before the onset of oncological therapy, although they can influence treatment success in the long term.

OBJECTIVE

This study focusses on a systematic assessment of swallowing function and nutritional status in head-and-neck cancer patients prior to oncological therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In 102 patients, penetration/aspiration (PA scale), limitations of oral intake (Functional Oral Intake Scale, FOIS), and the need for further intervention (NFI) were endoscopically assessed to objectively quantify swallowing function. The subjective evaluation of swallowing function was carried out with the gEAT-10 (German EAT-10) questionnaire, nutritional status was assessed by body mass index (BMI). Possible impact factors for swallowing function and BMI were analyzed by univariate and multivariate methods.

RESULTS

PAS, FOIS, and NFI values were abnormal in ≤ 15% of patients. BMI was more often too high than too low. Objectively assessed swallowing functions depended predominantly on tumor stage and showed moderate correlations with gEAT-10. The latter mostly yielded a "fail" result. The nutritional status depended on the patients' biological sex and NFI.

CONCLUSION

In the pre-treatment setting, neither dysphagia nor malnutrition were found in most patients. Impaired swallowing was associated with higher tumor stages, malnutrition with female sex and NFI. A systematic pre-treatment assessment of swallowing and nutritional status in head-and-neck cancer patients appears necessary for modern oncological therapy and optimal patient outcome.

Functional swallowing outcomes related to radiation exposure to dysphagia and aspiration-related structures in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing definitive and postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The relationship between swallowing outcomes and radiotherapy dose to dysphagia and aspiration-related structures (DARS) may be different following definitive versus postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) for mucosal head and neck cancer (HNC) and has not been well-studied.

METHOD

Patient- and clinician-reported swallowing measures were prospectively collected at six time points from baseline to 24 months postradiotherapy HNC. Radiotherapy plans were retrospectively analyzed to assess dose delivered to DARS. The association between swallowing outcomes and participant demographics, tumor characteristics, and radiotherapy dose in definitive and postoperative treatment cohorts was assessed.

RESULTS

Ninety-three participants who received radiotherapy for HNC were included in the analysis (n = 49 definitive radiotherapy for laryngeal/pharyngeal primary tumors and n = 44 postoperative PORT for predominantly oral cavity/salivary gland tumors). Participants undergoing PORT had lower doses to DARS than those undergoing definitive RT. High dose to the pharyngeal constrictors and base of tongue for definitive RT and the esophageal inlet, supraglottic larynx and cervical esophagus for the PORT group were associated with worse swallowing function.

CONCLUSION

Radiation dose to DARS is associated with post-treatment swallowing outcomes. These dose/outcome relationships may vary between the definitive and postoperative settings.

Development of a Subjective Symptom Rating Scale for Postoperative Oral Dysfunction in Patients with Oral Cancer: Reliability and Validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale-10

Currently, there is no scale to subjectively assess postoperative oral dysfunction in patients with oral cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Postoperative Oral Dysfunction Scale (POD-10) that we developed. Between September 2019 and August 2021, 62 eligible oral cancer patients (median age, 72 years; 42 men and 20 women) were enrolled in the study. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, which indicates the internal consistency of the scale, was 0.94, and the intraclass correlation coefficient, which indicates reproducibility, was 0.85 (95% confidential interval: 0.40–0.96, p < 0.05). Concurrent validity testing showed a statistically significant correlation between POD-10 and Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) (r = 0.89, p < 0.05). To test discriminant validity, statistically significant differences were found between early-stage cancer (stage I and II) and advanced-stage cancer (stage III and IV) (p < 0.05). Twenty-four points were calculated as the cutoff value for POD-10 using receiver operating characteristic analysis to calculate the cutoff value. The POD-10 was shown to be a clinically reliable and valid scale that can be used to subjectively assess postoperative oral dysfunction in patients with oral cancer and is expected to be used as a simple diagnostic tool.