1
|
Liu Y, Liu H, Chen S, Ren J, Tian X. Association between social support and the severity of positive symptoms in rural community-dwelling patients with schizophrenia during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:124. [PMID: 38355472 PMCID: PMC10868027 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05571-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study examined the association between social support and the severity of positive symptoms in rural community-dwelling schizophrenia patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD The cross-sectional study included 665 rural community-dwelling schizophrenia patients investigated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Social support was measured using the Social Support Rating Scale, and positive symptoms were assessed using the Positive Scale extracted from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Multiple linear regression was adopted to examine the association of social support with positive symptoms. RESULT The scores for total social support, subjective support, objective support and the use of social support were 28.3 ± 5.9, 16.4 ± 5.2, 6.5 ± 1.4 and 5.4 ± 2.8, respectively. Total social support (β = -0.08, 95%CI: -0.13 to -0.02, P < 0.01) and subjective social support (β = -0.10, 95%CI: -0.16 to -0.04, P < 0.01) were significantly and negatively associated with the Positive Scale score after adjustment for confounders. Objective social support (β = 0.11, 95%CI: -0.10 to 0.32, P = 0.31) and the use of social support (β = -0.03, 95%CI: -0.14 to 0.07, P = 0.53) were not significantly associated with the Positive Scale score. CONCLUSION The study confirmed the importance of social support, especially subjective support, provided to rural community-dwelling schizophrenia patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. This support should be addressed and strengthened for such patients in emergent events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yudan Liu
- School of Public Health, North Sichuan Medical College, No.234 Fujiang Road, 637000, Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - Hongying Liu
- Nanchong Psychosomatic Hospital Affiliated to North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - Siyu Chen
- Nanchong Psychosomatic Hospital Affiliated to North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - Jidong Ren
- Nanchong Psychosomatic Hospital Affiliated to North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - Xiaobing Tian
- School of Public Health, North Sichuan Medical College, No.234 Fujiang Road, 637000, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sakinyte K, Holmberg C. Psychometric and clinical evaluation of schizophrenia remission criteria in outpatients with psychotic disorders. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:207. [PMID: 36978160 PMCID: PMC10052840 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-04701-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia have debilitating effects on health and functioning. Given symptomatic remission's recent emergence as a viable treatment goal, the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group's criteria (RSWG-cr), based on eight items from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-8), are frequently used in clinical and research settings. Against that background, we sought to evaluate the PANSS-8's psychometric properties and examine the RSWG-cr's clinical validity among outpatients in Sweden. METHODS Cross-sectional register data were collected from outpatient psychosis clinics in Gothenburg, Sweden. Following confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses of PANSS-8 data (n = 1,744) to assess the PANSS-8's psychometric properties, internal reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha. Next, 649 of the patients were classified according to the RSWG-cr and their clinical and demographic characteristics compared. Binary logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and assess each variable's impact on remission status. RESULTS The PANSS-8 showed good reliability (α = .85), and the 3D model of psychoticism, disorganization, and negative symptoms presented the best model fit. According to the RSWG-cr, 55% of the 649 patients were in remission; they were also more likely to live independently, be employed, not smoke, not take antipsychotics, and have recently received a health interview and physical examination. Patients living independently (OR = 1.98), who were employed (OR = 1.89), who were obese (OR = 1.61), and who had recently received a physical examination (OR = 1.56) also had an increased likelihood of remission. CONCLUSIONS The PANSS-8 is internally reliable, and, according to the RSWG-cr, remission is associated with variables of interest for patients' recovery, including living independently and being employed. Although our findings from a large, heterogeneous sample of outpatients reflect everyday clinical practice and reinforce past observations, the directions of those relationships need to be assessed in longitudinal studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karolina Sakinyte
- Department of Psychotic Disorders, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Christopher Holmberg
- Department of Psychotic Disorders, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jiménez-López E, Villanueva-Romero CM, Sánchez-Morla EM, Martínez-Vizcaíno V, Ortiz M, Rodriguez-Jimenez R, Vieta E, Santos JL. Neurocognition, functional outcome, and quality of life in remitted and non-remitted schizophrenia: A comparison with euthymic bipolar I disorder and a control group. Schizophr Res 2022; 240:81-91. [PMID: 34991042 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.12.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
There are discrepancies about if the severity of the symptomatology in schizophrenia is related to neurocognitive performance, functional outcome, and quality of life (QoL). Also, there are controversial data about the comparison between euthymic bipolar patients and different subgroups of schizophrenia in neurocognition, functioning, and QoL level. The present study aimed to compare the neurocognitive performance, functional outcome, and QoL of remitted and non-remitted patients with SC with respect to a group of euthymic patients with BD, and a control group. It included 655 subjects: 98 patients with schizophrenia in remission (SC-R), 184 non-remitted patients with schizophrenia (SC-NR), 117 euthymic patients with bipolar I disorder (BD), and 256 healthy subjects. A comprehensive clinical, neurocognitive (six cognitive domains), functional, and QoL assessment was carried out. Remission criteria of Andreasen were used to classify schizophrenia patients as remitted or non-remitted. Compared with control subjects all groups of patients showed impaired neurocognitive performance, functioning and QoL. SC-R patients had an intermediate functioning between control subjects and SC-NR, all at a neurocognitive, functional, or QoL level. There were no significant differences between SC-R and BD. These results suggest that reaching clinical remission is essential to achieve a better level of psychosocial functioning, and QoL. Likewise, the results of this study suggest that euthymic patients with bipolar disorder and patients with schizophrenia in remission are comparable at the neurocognitive and functional levels, which might have implications in the pathophysiology of both disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Estela Jiménez-López
- Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Virgen de La Luz, Cuenca, Spain; Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha. Health and Social Research Center, Cuenca, Spain; Neurobiological Research Group. Institute of Technology, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain; CIBERSAM (Biomedical Research Networking Centre in Mental Health), Spain
| | | | - Eva María Sánchez-Morla
- CIBERSAM (Biomedical Research Networking Centre in Mental Health), Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain; School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain; CogPsy-Group, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Spain.
| | - Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno
- Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha. Health and Social Research Center, Cuenca, Spain; Universidad Autónoma de Chile. Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Talca, Chile
| | - M Ortiz
- Interdisciplinary Center for Security, Reliability and Trust (SnT), University of Luxembourg, 1855 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Roberto Rodriguez-Jimenez
- CIBERSAM (Biomedical Research Networking Centre in Mental Health), Spain; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre (imas12), Madrid, Spain; School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Madrid, Spain; CogPsy-Group, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), Spain
| | - Eduard Vieta
- CIBERSAM (Biomedical Research Networking Centre in Mental Health), Spain; Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Institute of Neuroscience, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - José Luis Santos
- Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Virgen de La Luz, Cuenca, Spain; Neurobiological Research Group. Institute of Technology, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain; CIBERSAM (Biomedical Research Networking Centre in Mental Health), Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dubreucq J, Gabayet F, Godin O, Andre M, Aouizerate B, Capdevielle D, Chereau I, Clauss-Kobayashi J, Coulon N, D’Amato T, Dorey JM, Dubertret C, Faraldo M, Laouamri H, Leigner S, Lancon C, Leboyer M, Llorca PM, Mallet J, Misdrahi D, Passerieux C, Rey R, Pignon B, Schorr B, Urbach M, Schürhoff F, Szoke A, Fond G, Berna F. Overlap and Mutual Distinctions Between Clinical Recovery and Personal Recovery in People With Schizophrenia in a One-Year Study. Schizophr Bull 2021; 48:382-394. [PMID: 34718808 PMCID: PMC8886587 DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbab114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Recovery is a multidimensional construct that can be defined either from a clinical perspective or from a consumer-focused one, as a self-broadening process aimed at living a meaningful life beyond mental illness. We aimed to longitudinally examine the overlap and mutual distinctions between clinical and personal recovery. Of 1239 people with schizophrenia consecutively recruited from the FondaMental Advanced Centers of Expertise for SZ network, the 507 present at one-year did not differ from those lost to follow-up. Clinical recovery was defined as the combination of clinical remission and functional remission. Personal recovery was defined as being in the rebuilding or in the growth stage of the Stages of Recovery Instrument (STORI). Full recovery was defined as the combination of clinical recovery and personal recovery. First, we examined the factors at baseline associated with each aspect of recovery. Then, we conducted multivariable models on the correlates of stable clinical recovery, stable personal recovery, and stable full recovery after one year. At baseline, clinical recovery and personal recovery were characterized by distinct patterns of outcome (i.e. better objective outcomes but no difference in subjective outcomes for clinical recovery, the opposite pattern for personal recovery, and better overall outcomes for full recovery). We found that clinical recovery and personal recovery predicted each other over time (baseline personal recovery for stable clinical recovery at one year; P = .026, OR = 4.94 [1.30-23.0]; baseline clinical recovery for stable personal recovery at one year; P = .016, OR = 3.64 [1.31-11.2]). In short, given the interaction but also the degree of difference between clinical recovery and personal recovery, psychosocial treatment should target, beyond clinical recovery, subjective aspects such as personal recovery and depression to reach full recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Dubreucq
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,Centre Référent de Réhabilitation psychosociale et de Remédiation cognitive (C3R), CH Alpes Isère, Saint Egrève, France,To whom correspondence should be addressed to: Centre Référent de Réhabilitation psychosociale et de Remédiation Cognitive (C3R), CH Alpes Isère, 8 place du Conseil National de la Résistance, 38400 Saint Martin d’Hères, France; tel: (33 4) 56 58 88 00, e-mail:
| | - Franck Gabayet
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,Centre Référent de Réhabilitation psychosociale et de Remédiation cognitive (C3R), CH Alpes Isère, Saint Egrève, France
| | - Ophélia Godin
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,Univ Paris Est Créteil, INSERM U955, IMRB, Translational Neuro-Psychiatry, Créteil, France
| | - Myrtille Andre
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,IGF, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France,Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie Adulte, Hôpital la Colombière, CHU Montpellier, France
| | - Bruno Aouizerate
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,Centre Hospitalier Charles Perrens, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France,INRA, NutriNeuro, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Delphine Capdevielle
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,IGF, University of Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France,Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie Adulte, Hôpital la Colombière, CHU Montpellier, France
| | - Isabelle Chereau
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,Université Clermont Auvergne, CMP-B CHU, CNRS, Clermont Auvergne INP, Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Julie Clauss-Kobayashi
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, INSERM U1114, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Nathalie Coulon
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,Centre Référent de Réhabilitation psychosociale et de Remédiation cognitive (C3R), CH Alpes Isère, Saint Egrève, France
| | - Thierry D’Amato
- INSERM, U1028, CNRS, UMR5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, PSYR2 team, Lyon, France,Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier, Centre Expert Dépression Résistante, Lyon, France
| | - Jean-Michel Dorey
- INSERM U1028, CNRS, UMR 5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, EDUWELL Team, Lyon 2 University, Lyon, France,Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier, Pôle PsyPA, Lyon, France
| | - Caroline Dubertret
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalo-Universitaire AP-HP Nord, Service de Psychiatrie et Addictologie. Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France,Université de Paris INSERM UMR1266, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Mégane Faraldo
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,Centre Référent de Réhabilitation psychosociale et de Remédiation cognitive (C3R), CH Alpes Isère, Saint Egrève, France
| | | | - Sylvain Leigner
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,Centre Référent de Réhabilitation psychosociale et de Remédiation cognitive (C3R), CH Alpes Isère, Saint Egrève, France
| | - Christophe Lancon
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalo-Universitaire AP-HP Nord, Service de Psychiatrie et Addictologie. Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France,Université de Paris INSERM UMR1266, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Marion Leboyer
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,Univ Paris Est Créteil, INSERM U955, IMRB, Translational Neuro-Psychiatry, Créteil, France,AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Département Médico-Universitaire de Psychiatrie et d’Addictologie (DMU IMPACT), Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire de Médecine de Précision en Psychiatrie (FHU ADAPT), Paris, France
| | - Pierre-Michel Llorca
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,Université Clermont Auvergne, CMP-B CHU, CNRS, Clermont Auvergne INP, Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Jasmina Mallet
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalo-Universitaire AP-HP Nord, Service de Psychiatrie et Addictologie. Hôpital Louis Mourier, Colombes, France,Université de Paris INSERM UMR1266, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris, Paris, France
| | - David Misdrahi
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,Pôle de psychiatrie Générale et Universitaire, Centre Hospitalier Charles Perrens, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS UMR 5287-INCIA, Bordeaux, France
| | - Christine Passerieux
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie d’Adultes et d’Addictologie, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, Le Chesnay, France,DisAP-DevPsy-CESP, INSERM UMR1018, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-En-Yvelines, Villejuif, France
| | - Romain Rey
- INSERM, U1028, CNRS, UMR5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, PSYR2 team, Lyon, France,Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier, Centre Expert Dépression Résistante, Lyon, France
| | - Baptiste Pignon
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,Univ Paris Est Créteil, INSERM U955, IMRB, Translational Neuro-Psychiatry, Créteil, France,AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Département Médico-Universitaire de Psychiatrie et d’Addictologie (DMU IMPACT), Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire de Médecine de Précision en Psychiatrie (FHU ADAPT), Paris, France
| | - Benoit Schorr
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, INSERM U1114, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Mathieu Urbach
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie d’Adultes et d’Addictologie, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles, Le Chesnay, France,DisAP-DevPsy-CESP, INSERM UMR1018, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-En-Yvelines, Villejuif, France
| | - Franck Schürhoff
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,Univ Paris Est Créteil, INSERM U955, IMRB, Translational Neuro-Psychiatry, Créteil, France,AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Département Médico-Universitaire de Psychiatrie et d’Addictologie (DMU IMPACT), Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire de Médecine de Précision en Psychiatrie (FHU ADAPT), Paris, France
| | - Andrei Szoke
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,Univ Paris Est Créteil, INSERM U955, IMRB, Translational Neuro-Psychiatry, Créteil, France,AP-HP, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Département Médico-Universitaire de Psychiatrie et d’Addictologie (DMU IMPACT), Fédération Hospitalo-Universitaire de Médecine de Précision en Psychiatrie (FHU ADAPT), Paris, France
| | | | - Guillaume Fond
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,AP-HM, Aix-Marseille Univ, School of medicine—La Timone Medical Campus, EA 3279: CEReSS—Health Service Research and Quality of Life Center, Marseille, France
| | - Fabrice Berna
- Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France,Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, INSERM U1114, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bınbay T, Ergül C, van Os J. Symptomatic Remission Along the Clinical Psychosis Spectrum: A Historical and Conceptual Review. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 58:S3-S6. [PMID: 34658628 PMCID: PMC8498811 DOI: 10.29399/npa.27701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: In this review, a historical and conceptual panorama of symptomatic remission will be provided with a focus on the whole clinical psychosis beyond schizophrenia. Methods: We included all published articles on remission in psychosis, without any restrictions regarding language or year. We used a string to detect relevant articles in PubMed. We reviewed the abstracts to exclude out of scope results. Then, we evaluated the remaining articles to extract data. Variables included year of publication, language of publication, country of origin, type of article, main topic of research, main disorder studied, and reference to remission criteria. Results: The final dataset included 439 citations which dates back to 1950. The Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group (RSWG) criteria which was proposed in 2005 had a major effect on remission research in schizophrenia. The RSWG criteria changed the yearly published numbers of research, the main land of remission research and the scope of the articles. After 2005, the number of publications rapidly increased, and English became the primary language of the articles. Beyond prominent clinical effect, the criteria did have little impact on functional remission in schizophrenia. And also research in the last decade provided very few information about remission in other clinical aspects of psychosis spectrum including acute, transient and chronic forms. Furthermore, although there has been a conceptual unity in the last decade the heterogeneity of the studies is still far from decreasing, which still blurs the efforts to evaluate remission in psychosis. Conclusion: Although studies on remission in schizophrenia started in the 1950s, the criteria published in 2005 changed the whole area. However, remission discussions are not yet valid for psychotic diagnoses other than schizophrenia and are limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tolga Bınbay
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Dokuz Eylul University, İzmir, Turkey
| | - Ceylan Ergül
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Üsküdar University, İstanbul, Turkey.,Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jim van Os
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huxley P, Krayer A, Poole R, Prendergast L, Aryal S, Warner R. Schizophrenia outcomes in the 21st century: A systematic review. Brain Behav 2021; 11:e02172. [PMID: 33991072 PMCID: PMC8213926 DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We report a review of outcomes in schizophrenia in the twenty-first century, replicating and extending work undertaken by the late Richard Warner in his seminal book, "Recovery from Schizophrenia: Psychiatry and Political Economy" (1985;2004). METHOD Warner's methods were followed as closely as possible. Only observational/naturalistic studies were included. Six scientific databases were searched from 2000 to 2020. 6,640 records were retrieved. 47 met inclusion criteria. RESULTS Overall, complete recovery is higher in this study than in Warner's (37.75% cf 20.4%), especially for first episode psychosis (FEP) (57.1% cf 20.7%). Clinical recovery, annualized remission rate (ARR), and employment outcomes were significantly superior for first episode psychosis compared with multiple episode psychosis (MEP). ARR shows a trend toward reduction over time, from 2.2 before the financial crash of 2008 to 1.6 after (t = 1.85 df 40 p = .07). The decline is statistically significant for the MEP group (t = 2.32 df18 p = .03). There were no differences in outcome by region, sample characteristics, outcome measures used, or quality of studies. Heterogeneity of clinical outcome measures across the literature makes evidence synthesis difficult. Weak and inconsistent reporting of functional and employment outcomes mean that findings lack meaning with respect to lived experience. CONCLUSION Future research strategies should aim to reduce heterogeneity in clinical outcome measures and to increase the emphasis on capture and reporting of more sophisticated measures of social and functional outcome. Outcome domains should be disaggregated rather than conflated into unitary recovery constructs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Huxley
- Centre for Mental Health and Society, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Anne Krayer
- Centre for Mental Health and Society, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Rob Poole
- Centre for Mental Health and Society, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Louise Prendergast
- Centre for Mental Health and Society, School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
| | - Sanjaya Aryal
- Department of Sociology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK
| | - Richard Warner
- Clinical Professor of Psychiatry and Adjunct Professor of Anthropology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pruessner M, King S, Veru F, Schalinski I, Vracotas N, Abadi S, Jordan G, Lepage M, Iyer S, Malla AK, Shah J, Joober R. Impact of childhood trauma on positive and negative symptom remission in first episode psychosis. Schizophr Res 2021; 231:82-89. [PMID: 33812301 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Early life adversity is suspected to play an important role for onset and course of psychosis, but its relationship with longer-term clinical outcome is not entirely clear. In this longitudinal study, we investigated the impact of childhood trauma (CT) on positive and negative symptom remission in first episode psychosis (FEP) patients over two years. METHODS A total of 210 FEP patients were assessed with the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Patients reporting moderate to severe trauma (CT; N = 114; 54.3%) were compared to those without trauma (N-CT; N = 96; 45.7%). Positive (PSR) and negative symptom remission (NSR) were determined monthly over 24 months following established criteria using the Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms and the Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms. Global Functioning was evaluated at baseline and 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS Compared to N-CT patients, CT patients had achieved significantly lower rates of PSR at 12 months and significantly lower rates of NSR at 24 months. A dose-response relationship was observed between the number of trauma categories fulfilled and the number of patients not achieving PSR and NSR at these time points. Higher trauma scores were significantly associated with poor functioning and higher positive and negative symptom severity at 24 months, but not at baseline and 12 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION Differential effects of CT on clinical outcome may not be apparent at psychosis onset, but only become evident through poor symptomatic remission and general functioning over time. Targeted diagnostic and therapeutic efforts after illness onset might limit these detrimental consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marita Pruessner
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montréal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Québec, Canada; McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montréal, Québec, Canada; University of Konstanz, Department of Psychology, Konstanz, Germany.
| | - Suzanne King
- McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Franz Veru
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montréal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Québec, Canada; McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Inga Schalinski
- University of Konstanz, Department of Psychology, Konstanz, Germany
| | - Nadia Vracotas
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montréal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Québec, Canada; McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Sherezad Abadi
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montréal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Québec, Canada; McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Gerald Jordan
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montréal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Québec, Canada; McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Martin Lepage
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montréal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Québec, Canada; McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Srividya Iyer
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montréal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Québec, Canada; McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Ashok K Malla
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montréal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Québec, Canada; McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jai Shah
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montréal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Québec, Canada; McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Ridha Joober
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montréal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Québec, Canada; McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mallet J, Lancrenon S, Llorca PM, Lançon C, Baylé FJ, Gorwood P. Validation of a four items version of the Functional Remission of General Schizophrenia scale (the mini-FROGS) to capture the functional benefits of clinical remission. Eur Psychiatry 2020; 47:35-41. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2017] [Revised: 08/31/2017] [Accepted: 09/05/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractObjectivesWe previously developed the Functional Remission Of General Schizophrenia (FROGS) scale demonstrating first, reliable assessment in a cross-sectional study and second, good time-stability. The purpose of the present analysis was to propose a shorter version (mini-FROGS), more compatible with the limited time available in a psychiatric visit, focusing on the functional domains that have higher likelihood of being improved with higher and/or longer symptomatic remission in different cultural backgrounds.MethodsWe used multiple regressions to find the most informative items explaining increased length of symptomatic remission, using prospective data from a national observational multicenter survey. Then, the mini-FROGS was used in different European countries to test its between-center reliability, compared to other scales.ResultsFour domains were retained as capturing the maximum of symptomatic remission, namely (1) travel and communication, (2) management of illness and treatment, (3) self-esteem and sense of independence and (4) respect of biological rhythms. First, the mini-FROG was evaluated in 443 French patients with clinical remission and 22 without, and 12/18 months later in 140 patients still in clinical remission and 23 in relapse. In Europe, 295 schizophrenia patients were assessed with the mini-FROGS and other scales devoted to functional remission, allowing comparisons. The mini-FROGS showed good correlations with other scales in different countries and demonstrated good psychometric properties.ConclusionThese results give evidence that a 4 items-only version of the FROGS scale may be useful to assess important aspects of functional remission, tightly linked to the length of clinical remission.
Collapse
|
9
|
Schennach R, Obermeier M, Spellmann I, Seemüller F, Musil R, Jäger M, Schmauss M, Laux G, Pfeiffer H, Naber D, Schmidt LG, Gaebel W, Klosterkötter J, Heuser I, Bauer M, Adli M, Zeiler J, Bender W, Kronmüller KT, Ising M, Brieger P, Maier W, Lemke MR, Rüther E, Klingberg S, Gastpar M, Möller HJ, Riedel M. Remission in schizophrenia - What are we measuring? Comparing the consensus remission criteria to a CGI-based definition of remission and to remission in major depression. Schizophr Res 2019; 209:185-192. [PMID: 31138482 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2018] [Revised: 03/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite being recommended for use in clinical trials, the consensus remission criteria were found to leave patients with persisting symptoms, relevant areas of functional impairment and a decreased sense of wellbeing. Therefore, to evaluate the appropriateness of the schizophrenia consensus criteria, a definition of remission based on the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI) was developed and remitter subgroups were compared. METHODS 239 patients with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder were evaluated regarding their remission status after inpatient treatment. Remission in schizophrenia was defined according to the symptom-severity component of the consensus criteria by Andreasen et al. and a CGI based definition was calculated using sensitivity and specificity using receiver operating curves (asymptomatic remitter). Both remitter groups (schizophrenia consensus versus asymptomatic remitters) were compared regarding different clinical variables at discharge as well as the likelihood to relapse within a 1-year follow-up period. Both schizophrenia remitter subgroups were compared to remitters in major depression as a reference value. RESULTS Following the consensus criteria, 63% of the schizophrenia patients were in remission compared to only 18% following the asymptomatic criterion. The schizophrenia consensus remitters were less likely to be concurrent treatment responders (p < 0.0001), had a significantly greater illness severity (p < 0.0001) and less functioning (p = 0.0358) as well as a significantly greater risk to relapse (p = 0.0174) compared to the schizophrenia asymptomatic remitters as well as the depressed remitters. CONCLUSION It should be critically re-evaluated if the currently proposed consensus criteria are adequate to measure what is traditionally understood to be remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Schennach
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Schön Clinic Roseneck, Germany.
| | - Michael Obermeier
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Ilja Spellmann
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Department of Special Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Klinikum Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Florian Seemüller
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Richard Musil
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Jäger
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, Psychosomatic and Psychotherapy, Bezirkskrankenhaus Kempten, Germany
| | - Max Schmauss
- Psychiatric Clinic, District Hospital Augsburg, Germany
| | - Gerd Laux
- Psychiatric Clinic, Inn-Salzach Hospital Wasserburg/Inn, Germany
| | - Herbert Pfeiffer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Munich East, kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum Haar, Germany
| | - Dieter Naber
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lutz G Schmidt
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Mainz, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Gaebel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Dusseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Isabella Heuser
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charite Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Germany
| | - Michael Bauer
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Joachim Zeiler
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Auguste-Viktoria-Krankenhaus Berlin, Germany
| | - Wolfram Bender
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Munich East, kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum Haar, Germany
| | | | - Marcus Ising
- Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Brieger
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Munich East, kbo-Isar-Amper-Klinikum Haar, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Maier
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Eckart Rüther
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Göttingen, Germany
| | - Stefan Klingberg
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Markus Gastpar
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Essen, Germany
| | - Hans-Jürgen Möller
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Riedel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany; Psychiatric Clinic Rodewisch, Rodewisch, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Longitudinal evidence for a relation between depressive symptoms and quality of life in schizophrenia using structural equation modeling. Schizophr Res 2019; 208:82-89. [PMID: 31047723 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Revised: 02/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia often report a low quality of life (QoL). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether we could replicate a cross-sectional model by Alessandrini et al. (2016, n = 271) and whether this model predicts QoL later in life. This model showed strong associations between schizophrenia spectrum symptoms and depressive symptoms on QoL, but lacked follow-up assessment. This model was adapted in the current study and the robustness was investigated by using a longitudinal design in which the association between baseline variables (including IQ, depression, schizophrenia spectrum symptoms as well as social functioning) and QoL during 3-years of follow-up was investigated. We included patients with a non-affective psychotic disorder (n = 744) from a prospective naturalistic cohort-study. In the cross-sectional model, with good measure of fit, both depression as well as social functioning was associated with QoL (direct path coefficient -0.28 and 0.41, respectively). Additionally, the severity of schizophrenia spectrum symptoms was highly associated with social functioning (direct path coefficient -0.70). Importantly, the longitudinal model showed good measures of fit, which strengthens the validity of the initial model and highlights that depression prospectively affect QoL while schizophrenia spectrum symptoms prospectively influence QoL via social functioning. The negative, longitudinal impact of a depression on QoL highlights the need to focus on treatment of this co-morbidity.
Collapse
|
11
|
Pruessner M, King S, Vracotas N, Abadi S, Iyer S, Malla AK, Shah J, Joober R. Gender differences in childhood trauma in first episode psychosis: Association with symptom severity over two years. Schizophr Res 2019; 205:30-37. [PMID: 29935881 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2018] [Revised: 06/11/2018] [Accepted: 06/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Early life adversity is associated with increased risk for psychosis onset and poor clinical outcome. Male compared to female patients often show a more severe course of psychotic illness. The aim of the present study was to investigate gender differences in childhood trauma (CT) and their impact on symptomatic and functional outcome following psychosis onset. The study included 210 patients (144 men, 66 women) diagnosed with a first-episode of psychosis (FEP). Early adversity was assessed with the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Psychotic symptoms and general functioning were rated with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and Global Assessment of Functioning scale at baseline, 12 and 24 months of follow-up in an established early intervention service. Male patients reported higher rates of physical or emotional neglect, whereas female patients indicated significantly higher rates of emotional abuse. More severe CT was related to higher levels of depression in women and to negative symptoms in men. Distinct CT effects were observed on positive and negative symptom severity and global functioning in male patients at 24 months. Emotional abuse was the strongest predictor of depression in both genders. In male patients only, emotional abuse predicted positive symptom severity and impaired global functioning, whereas emotional neglect predicted more severe negative symptoms. Our results suggest differences in CT experiences in male and female FEP patients, with a more pronounced impact on longer-term outcome in male patients. The findings support the notion that sex differences in stress vulnerability account for the relatively poor illness course in male psychosis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marita Pruessner
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montréal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Canada; McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montréal, Québec, Canada; University of Konstanz, Department of Clinical Psychology, Konstanz, Germany.
| | - Suzanne King
- McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Nadia Vracotas
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montréal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Canada; McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Sherezad Abadi
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montréal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Canada
| | - Srividya Iyer
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montréal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Canada; McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Ashok K Malla
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montréal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Canada; McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jai Shah
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montréal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Canada; McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Ridha Joober
- Prevention and Early Intervention Program for Psychosis (PEPP-Montréal), Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, Canada; McGill University, Department of Psychiatry, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bo Q, Li F, Li X, Wang Z, Dong F, He F, Li A, Ma X, Wang C. Symptomatic remission in schizophrenia: Results from a risperidone maintenance treatment study. Psychiatry Res 2017; 258:289-294. [PMID: 28865716 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.08.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2016] [Revised: 05/31/2017] [Accepted: 08/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate remission following the treatment of schizophrenia patients with risperidone. Clinically stabilized patients with schizophrenia (n = 374) were randomly assigned to 4-week, 26-week, or no-dose-reduction groups, in which the baseline risperidone dose was continued for 4, 26, or all weeks during 1-year period. The 'Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale' (PANNS) was assessed at baseline and monthly for six months, followed by every two months until the last recruited patient completed 1-year follow-up. Symptomatic remission was defined according to criteria established by the Schizophrenia Working Group. A Generalized Linear Mixed Model indicated significant variation in remission over time, which increased after baseline in the entire group (F = 49.32, df = 1, 3114, P < 0.001). The overall length of risperidone treatment (F = 4.34, df = 1, 416, P = 0.038) and the duration of illness (F = 8.51, df = 1, 359, P = 0.004) had significantly negative effects upon remission. Baseline remission patients were associated with a significantly increased time to relapse compared with the baseline of non-remission patients over a one year follow up period (F = 5.74, df = 1, 367, P = 0.017). One-year risperidone maintenance treatment increased remission rates in schizophrenia. A shorter illness duration, risperidone treatment length, and a lower total PANSS score were clinically useful predictors of remission. Achieving remission may postpone relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qijing Bo
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100088, China; Center of Schizophrenia, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Laboratory of Brain Disorders (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing 100088, China
| | - Feng Li
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100088, China; Center of Schizophrenia, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Laboratory of Brain Disorders (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing 100088, China
| | - Xianbin Li
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100088, China; Center of Schizophrenia, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Laboratory of Brain Disorders (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing 100088, China
| | - Zhimin Wang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100088, China; Center of Schizophrenia, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Laboratory of Brain Disorders (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing 100088, China
| | - Fang Dong
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100088, China; Center of Schizophrenia, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Laboratory of Brain Disorders (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing 100088, China
| | - Fan He
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100088, China; Center of Schizophrenia, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Laboratory of Brain Disorders (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing 100088, China
| | - Anning Li
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100088, China; Center of Schizophrenia, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Laboratory of Brain Disorders (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing 100088, China
| | - Xin Ma
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100088, China
| | - Chuanyue Wang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100088, China; Center of Schizophrenia, Beijing Institute for Brain Disorders, Laboratory of Brain Disorders (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing 100088, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jaracz K, Górna K, Kiejda J, Grabowska-Fudala B, Jaracz J, Suwalska A, Rybakowski JK. Psychosocial functioning in relation to symptomatic remission: A longitudinal study of first episode schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry 2015; 30:907-13. [PMID: 26647865 DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2015] [Revised: 07/30/2015] [Accepted: 08/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aims of the study were: (1) to evaluate longitudinally symptomatic remission in first-episode (FE) schizophrenia, (2) to describe symptoms, social functioning and quality of life (Qol) in relation to remission status, and (3) to determine the long-term outcome of schizophrenia and its early predictors. METHODS Sixty-four patients were assessed 1 month after a first hospitalization (T1), 12 months (T2), 4-6 years (T3), and 7-11 years (T4) after T1. The patients were allocated to three remission groups according to their remission status over the whole observation period, e.g. stable remission (SR), unstable remission (UR) and non-remission (NR). The PANSS, Social Functioning Scale and WHOQoL were used to evaluate the patients' psychosocial functioning levels, symptomatic and functional remissions and satisfying QoL. A good outcome was defined as meeting, simultaneously, the criteria of symptomatic and functional remissions and satisfying QoL at T4, while failure to meet all of these criteria was defined as a poor outcome. RESULTS Among them, 17.2% patients were in stable remission, 57.8% in unstable remission and 25.0% were unremitted at all time points. The SR group had lower levels of psychopathological symptoms and reported better social functioning and QoL than the NR group. During the follow-up, the symptoms increased, social functioning slightly improved and QoL did not change. At T4, 53% of the sample had a poor outcome, which was independently predicted by the longer duration of untreated psychosis and a lack of satisfying QoL at T1. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate that: (1) the long-term course in schizophrenia is heterogeneous and that three illness trajectories exist, (2) social functioning and QoL are only partially connected with symptomatic remission (3), the risk of a poor outcome may potentially be reduced by appropriate interventions at an early stage of the illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Jaracz
- Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Nursing, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Smoluchowski 11 street, 60-179, Poznan, Poland.
| | - K Górna
- Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Nursing, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Smoluchowski 11 street, 60-179, Poznan, Poland
| | - J Kiejda
- Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Nursing, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Smoluchowski 11 street, 60-179, Poznan, Poland
| | - B Grabowska-Fudala
- Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Nursing, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Smoluchowski 11 street, 60-179, Poznan, Poland
| | - J Jaracz
- Department of Adult Psychiatry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - A Suwalska
- Department of Adult Psychiatry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - J K Rybakowski
- Department of Adult Psychiatry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|