Ethical conflicts between residents and attending physicians

Professional decision-making in medicine: Development of a new measure and preliminary evidence of validity

Introduction

This study developed a new Professional Decision-Making in Medicine Measure that assesses the use of effective decision-making strategies: seek help, manage emotions, recognize consequences and rules, and test assumptions and motives. The aim was to develop a content valid measure and obtain initial evidence for construct validity so that the measure could be used in future research or educational assessment.

Methods

Clinical scenario-based items were developed based on a review of the literature and interviews with physicians. For each item, respondents are tasked with selecting two responses (out of six plausible options) that they would choose in that situation. Three of the six options reflect a decision-making strategy; these responses are scored as correct. Data were collected from a sample of 318 fourth-year medical students in the United States. They completed a 16-item version of the measure (Form A) and measures of social desirability, moral disengagement, and professionalism attitudes. Professionalism ratings from clerkships were also obtained. A sub-group (n = 63) completed a second 16-item measure (Form B) to pilot test the instrument, as two test forms are useful for pre-posttest designs.

Results

Scores on the new measure indicated that, on average, participants answered 75% of items correctly. Evidence for construct validity included the lack of correlation between scores on the measure and socially desirable responding, negative correlation with moral disengagement, and modest to low correlations with professionalism attitudes. A positive correlation was observed with a clerkship rating focused on professionalism in peer interactions.

Conclusions

These findings demonstrate modest proficiency in the use of decision-making strategies among fourth-year medical students. Additional research using the Professional Decision-Making Measure should explore scores among physicians in various career stages, and the causes and correlates of scores. Educators could utilize the measure to assess courses that teach decision-making strategies.

Ethical Concerns for Organ Transplant Coordinators

A great deal has been written about the ethics of organ transplantation. Much of it has (appropriately) concerned issues of policy—for example, how best to allocate scarce organs, avoid conflicts of interest, and increase the pool of potential donors. Although these discussions are important, they often fail to provide much context for applying relevant ethical precepts to the day-to-day activities of those directly involved in organ procurement. The purpose of this paper is to provide such a context by reviewing several key conceptual issues, drawing attention to various ethical and procedural distinctions, and offering some practical recommendations for addressing these issues with physicians and other healthcare providers.

Ethical conflicts and moral distress experienced by paediatric residents during their training

BACKGROUND

Paediatric residents experience numerous ethical conflicts; some of these are experienced by all paediatricians, while others are specifically related to residency training. It has been reported that medical students often feel that they are placed in positions that compromise their own ethical principles. A study in the United States showed that interns frequently face examples of unethical and/or unprofessional conduct among staff.

OBJECTIVES

To identify the ethical conflicts and moral distress experienced by paediatric residents during their training.

METHODOLOGY

Data were collected from four focus groups, which were organized according to the four separate years of residency training. Focus groups consisting of four to 10 participants were led by a research assistant. The focus groups were recorded by an audio device and transcribed verbatim; all data that would identify any of the participants or staff were eliminated. Data analysis involved a modified thematic analysis. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Ontario.

RESULTS

While residents occasionally face traditional paediatric ethical issues, such as 'do not resuscitate' orders, more often they experience conflicts because of their inexperience and their place in the hierarchy of the medical care team, particularly when there is disagreement between trainees and senior staff. Their ability to deal and cope with these issues changes as they go through their training. Many residents in the first part of their training were more frustrated and confused with ethical conflicts. In these cases, residents found their best support from their peers and other senior residents. Residents in the later years of training seemed more accustomed to ethical issues. Furthermore, almost all of the residents believed that other members of their health care team have acted in an unethical or unprofessional way.

CONCLUSION

Paediatric residents experience significant ethical conflicts and moral distress. Understanding these ethical issues will help those responsible for postgraduate medical education to review or revise the ethics curriculum in keeping with the current moral distress experienced by residents, and help to mentor and guide trainees.

Prescribing of Controlled Substances for Non-Patients in the Educational Setting: Review of the Ethical, Legal, and Moral Dilemma for Residents

Prescription drug abuse is an enormous problem in modern society. Studies have shown that it results in more injuries and deaths to Americans than all illegal drugs combined.1 In this review, the author discusses the prescribing of controlled substances by residents as it relates to intercollegial and other non-patient workplace encounters. Physician drug abuse, medical/legal issues regarding controlled substance prescriptions, and ethical conflicts will be discussed. These issues will be specifically addressed as they relate to the academic institutions where residents can potentially be placed in a moral, ethical and legal dilemma by supervisors and co-workers. Finally, a recommendation for an institutional policy will be suggested to help residents and other physicians recognize and deal with drug seeking behavior by coworkers. Also, a recommendation regarding strict institutional regulation of resident prescription practices regarding controlled substances will be presented.

Residents' access to ethics consultations: knowledge, use, and perceptions

PURPOSE

To examine residents' levels of awareness, use, and perceptions of the ethics consultation service at Loyola University Medical Center, a large Midwestern academic teaching hospital.

METHOD

In 2001-2002, the authors conducted a cross-sectional survey and semistructured interviews about knowledge and use of the ethics consultation service among all 229 internal medicine, surgery, anesthesiology, pediatrics, and medicine-pediatrics residents. Chi-square and t tests were used to compare categorical and continuous variables.

RESULTS

In all, 135 (59%) of the residents responded, and of these 22 (16%) completed an interview. Most survey respondents (76%) reported awareness of the ethics consultation service, although only 28 (21%) indicated they knew how to request one. Most respondents (89%) had never personally requested an ethics consultation. Thirteen residents (10%) had wanted to call an ethics consultation, but decided not to request one. Residents reported barriers to requesting an ethics consultation were the attending physician's opposition (46%), lack of awareness of the ethics consultation service (15%), and negative perceptions of ethics consultations (15%).

CONCLUSION

Several barriers hindered residents' use of ethics consultation services. Health care institutions should systematically educate employees about the availability and use of ethics consultation services. Institutions should establish mechanisms to give health care professionals in subordinate roles within the medical hierarchy a safe way to access and use the service.

Ethical concerns for organ transplant coordinators

A great deal has been written about the ethics of organ transplantation. Much of it has (appropriately) concerned issues of policy--for example, how best to allocate scarce organs, avoid conflicts of interest, and increase the pool of potential donors. Although these discussions are important, they often fail to provide much context for applying relevant ethical precepts to the day-to-day activities of those directly involved in organ procurement. The purpose of this paper is to provide such a context by reviewing several key conceptual issues, drawing attention to various ethical and procedural distinctions, and offering some practical recommendations for addressing these issues with physicians and other healthcare providers.