Screening for depression in urban Latino adolescents

Bringing Inclusion Into Pediatric Primary Health Care: A Systematic Review of the Behavioral Health Treatment of Racial and Ethnic Minority Youth

INTRODUCTION

Currently, pediatric behavioral health care accounts for one of the fastest growing health care expenditures. Children representing racial and ethnic minority groups are still found to experience significant behavioral health needs. Primary health care represents the first level of contact with the health care system.

METHOD

The purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize articles discussing the behavioral health needs and treatment of racial and ethnic minority in primary care settings.

RESULTS

Results yielded 40 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Themes included: provider screening, provider selected treatments, prevalence and need, and stigma and patient-provider communication.

CONCLUSIONS

Themes were discussed through the Ecological Systems Theory lens. Study limitations included its exclusion of intellectual disabilities like Autism Spectrum Disorder, lack of literature utilizing large minority samples, and lack of attention to the intersection between race and/or ethnicity alongside other demographics of concern like gender, age, social class, and geographical location.

Adverse Childhood Experiences, Depression, Resilience, & Spirituality in African-American Adolescents

Research shows that exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) is common among adolescents and that exposure to ACEs is associated with an increased risk of depression in adolescents. Furthermore, it is unknown whether resilience and spirituality moderate the association between ACEs and depression in African-American adolescents. Thus, the present study examined the prevalence of ACEs and the association between ACEs and the risk for depression in African-American adolescents and examined whether this association is moderated by resilience and spirituality. Survey data were collected from African-American adolescents who attended youth-targeted events held by churches in Houston, TX. An expanded ACE tool was used to collect data and respondents were dichotomized into two groups based on their summed ACE scores, i.e., 0-3 ACEs versus 4-19 ACEs. Logistic regression was conducted to examine the association between ACEs and the likelihood of depression and to examine whether this association is moderated by resilience and spirituality. The results indicate that half of the sample had been exposed to four or more ACEs and that ACEs are negatively associated with depression: higher levels of resilience and spirituality suggest a lower likelihood of depression. These results suggest the need to explore the prevalence of cumulative ACEs among homogenous samples of African-American adolescents and the need to continue exploring and addressing the prevalence of individual ACEs among homogenous samples of African-American adolescents. No clinical trials were performed for this study.

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Mindfulness-Based Group Intervention for Adolescents with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The aim of the study is to explore the feasibility and initial outcomes of a mindfulness-based group intervention (MBI) for adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). A mixed-methods uncontrolled study using an adapted 8-week group MBI for adolescents with IBD was conducted at a pediatric tertiary hospital. Primary outcomes focused on feasibility. Secondary outcomes focused on preliminary efficacy via quality of life, mindfulness, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Of a total of 44 adolescents invited to participate, 16 adolescents completed the study. Group attendance and home meditation practice was satisfactory. There were significant differences in emotional functioning relative to IBD following MBI-A participation. Qualitative analysis rendered two themes: (1) personal interpretation and application of mindfulness and (2) the benefits of IBD-specific peer support. Several key adaptations are needed to increase feasibility of group MBIs prior to randomized controlled trials. Findings can be generalized to inform group-based therapies for adolescents with IBD.

What Caregivers Want: Preferences for Behavioral Health Screening Implementation Procedures in Pediatric Primary Care

There has been a national push for universal psychosocial prevention screening in pediatric primary care. Implementation science highlights the importance of considering patients' perspectives when developing such procedures; however, minimal studies have examined this. The present study employed a mixed-methods design to examine caregivers of pediatric patients' (n = 149) preferences and comfort with psychosocial screening procedures. A subset of participants (n = 20) were interviewed to better understand reasons for responses. Results indicated that caregivers rated screening for physical health, development, emotion and behavior, caregiver adverse childhood experiences (ACEs), and child ACEs within primary care as important or very important. The majority of caregivers were not comfortable completing screenings in the waiting room and preferred the exam room. Caregivers primarily preferred the primary care provider to administer screenings and communicate results and recommendations. Parents also preferred the behavioral health provider to provide recommendations on emotion and behavior, parent ACEs, and child ACEs. Qualitative reasons for responses included relationship quality, knowledge of child, expertise, and desire for direct communication. Findings have implications for developing family-centered, trauma-informed practices within primary care, particularly among those within under-resourced rural communities.

Guidelines for Adolescent Depression in Primary Care (GLAD-PC): Part I. Practice Preparation, Identification, Assessment, and Initial Management

OBJECTIVES

To update clinical practice guidelines to assist primary care (PC) clinicians in the management of adolescent depression. This part of the updated guidelines is used to address practice preparation, identification, assessment, and initial management of adolescent depression in PC settings.

METHODS

By using a combination of evidence- and consensus-based methodologies, guidelines were developed by an expert steering committee in 2 phases as informed by (1) current scientific evidence (published and unpublished) and (2) draft revision and iteration among the steering committee, which included experts, clinicians, and youth and families with lived experience.

RESULTS

Guidelines were updated for youth aged 10 to 21 years and correspond to initial phases of adolescent depression management in PC, including the identification of at-risk youth, assessment and diagnosis, and initial management. The strength of each recommendation and its evidence base are summarized. The practice preparation, identification, assessment, and initial management section of the guidelines include recommendations for (1) the preparation of the PC practice for improved care of adolescents with depression; (2) annual universal screening of youth 12 and over at health maintenance visits; (3) the identification of depression in youth who are at high risk; (4) systematic assessment procedures by using reliable depression scales, patient and caregiver interviews, and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition criteria; (5) patient and family psychoeducation; (6) the establishment of relevant links in the community, and (7) the establishment of a safety plan.

CONCLUSIONS

This part of the guidelines is intended to assist PC clinicians in the identification and initial management of adolescents with depression in an era of great clinical need and shortage of mental health specialists, but they cannot replace clinical judgment; these guidelines are not meant to be the sole source of guidance for depression management in adolescents. Additional research that addresses the identification and initial management of youth with depression in PC is needed, including empirical testing of these guidelines.

A system dynamics model of clinical decision thresholds for the detection of developmental-behavioral disorders

Background

Clinical decision-making has been conceptualized as a sequence of two separate processes: assessment of patients’ functioning and application of a decision threshold to determine whether the evidence is sufficient to justify a given decision. A range of factors, including use of evidence-based screening instruments, has the potential to influence either or both processes. However, implementation studies seldom specify or assess the mechanism by which screening is hypothesized to influence clinical decision-making, thus limiting their ability to address unexpected findings regarding clinicians’ behavior. Building on prior theory and empirical evidence, we created a system dynamics (SD) model of how physicians’ clinical decisions are influenced by their assessments of patients and by factors that may influence decision thresholds, such as knowledge of past patient outcomes. Using developmental-behavioral disorders as a case example, we then explore how referral decisions may be influenced by changes in context. Specifically, we compare predictions from the SD model to published implementation trials of evidence-based screening to understand physicians’ management of positive screening results and changes in referral rates. We also conduct virtual experiments regarding the influence of a variety of interventions that may influence physicians’ thresholds, including improved access to co-located mental health care and improved feedback systems regarding patient outcomes.

Results

Results of the SD model were consistent with recent implementation trials. For example, the SD model suggests that if screening improves physicians’ accuracy of assessment without also influencing decision thresholds, then a significant proportion of children with positive screens will not be referred and the effect of screening implementation on referral rates will be modest—results that are consistent with a large proportion of published screening trials. Consistent with prior theory, virtual experiments suggest that physicians’ decision thresholds can be influenced and detection of disabilities improved by increasing access to referral sources and enhancing feedback regarding false negative cases.

Conclusions

The SD model of clinical decision-making offers a theoretically based framework to improve understanding of physicians’ behavior and the results of screening implementation trials. The SD model is also useful for initial testing of hypothesized strategies to increase detection of under-identified medical conditions.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0517-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Universal mental health screening in pediatric primary care: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Universal mental health screening in pediatric primary care is recommended, but studies report slow uptake and low rates of patient follow-through after referral to specialized services. This review examined possible explanations related to the process of screening, focusing on how parents and youth are engaged, and how providers evaluate and use screening results.

METHOD

A narrative synthesis was developed after a systematic review of 3 databases (plus follow-up of citations, expert recommendations, and checks for multiple publications about the same study). Searching identified 1,188 titles, and of these, 186 full-text articles were reviewed. Two authors extracted data from 45 articles meeting inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Published studies report few details about how mental health screens were administered, including how clinicians explain their purpose or confidentiality, or whether help was provided for language, literacy, or disability problems. Although they were not addressed directly in the studies reviewed, uptake and detection rates appeared to vary with means of administration. Screening framed as universal, confidential, and intended to optimize attention to patient concerns increased acceptability. Studies said little about how providers were taught to explore screen results. Screening increased referrals, but many still followed negative screens, in some cases because of parent concerns apparently not reflected by screen results but possibly stemming from screen-prompted discussions.

CONCLUSIONS

Little research has addressed the process of engaging patients in mental health screening in pediatric primary care or how clinicians can best use screening results. The literature does offer suggestions for better clinical practice and research that may lead to improvements in uptake and outcome.