A Learning Collaborative Approach to Improve Primary Care STI Screening

Financial Interventions to Improve Screening in Primary Care: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Although health screenings offer timely detection of health conditions and enable early intervention, adoption is often poor. How might financial interventions create the necessary incentives and resources to improve screening in primary care settings? This systematic review aimed to answer this question.

METHODS

Peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2023 were identified and categorized by the level of intervention (practice or individual) and type of intervention, specifically alternative payment models (APMs), fee-for-service (FFS), capitation, and capital investments. Outcomes included frequency of screening, performance/quality of care (e.g., patient satisfaction, health outcomes), and workflow changes (e.g., visit length, staffing).

RESULTS

Of 51 included studies, a majority focused on practice-level interventions (n=32), used APMs (n=41) that involved payments for achieving key performance indicators (KPIs; n=31) and were of low or very low strength of evidence based on GRADE criteria (n=42). Studies often included screenings for cancer (n=32), diabetes care (n=18), and behavioral health (n=15). KPI payments to both practices and individual providers corresponded with increased screening rates, whereas capitation and provider-level FFS models yielded mixed results. A large majority of studies assessed changes in screening rates (n=48) with less focus on quality of care (n=11) or workflow changes (n=4).

DISCUSSION

Financial mechanisms can enhance screening rates with evidence strongest for KPI payments to both practices and individual providers. Future research should explore the relationship between financial interventions and quality of care, in terms of both clinical processes and patient outcomes, as well as the role of these interventions in shaping care delivery.

Opportunities to Improve Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in Primary Care Clinics

Primary care providers are well positioned to address the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs of adolescents; however, gaps often exist in the delivery of quality SRH services in primary care. Our objective was to identify specific opportunities to improve the delivery of adolescent SRH services in primary care. We conducted in-depth interviews with 25 primary care providers from various disciplines across rural and urban areas of Minnesota and conducted thematic analysis of transcribed data. Participants identified salient opportunities in three areas: (1) training and resources for providers (e.g., related to minor consent laws or addressing sensitive subjects), (2) practices and procedures (e.g., time-alone procedures and policies for confidential screening and sharing test results), and (3) education for adolescents (e.g., knowing their rights and accessing confidential SRH services). Study findings provide actionable opportunities to improve delivery of adolescent SRH services in primary care.

Exemplary Practices in Cardiovascular Care: Results on Clinical Quality Measures from the EvidenceNOW Southwest Cooperative

BACKGROUND

Identifying characteristics of primary care practices that perform well on cardiovascular clinical quality measures (CQMs) may point to important practice improvement strategies.

OBJECTIVE

To identify practice characteristics associated with high performance on four cardiovascular disease CQMs.

DESIGN

Longitudinal cohort study among 211 primary care practices in Colorado and New Mexico. Quarterly CQM reports were obtained from 178 (84.4%) practices. There was 100% response rate for baseline practice characteristics and implementation tracking surveys. Follow-up implementation tracking surveys were completed for 80.6% of practices.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients, staff, and clinicians in family medicine, general internal medicine, and mixed-specialty practices.

INTERVENTION

Practices received 9 months of practice facilitation and health information technology support, plus biannual collaborative learning sessions.

MAIN MEASURES

This study identified practice characteristics associated with overall highest performance using area under the curve (AUC) analysis on aspirin therapy, blood pressure management, and smoking cessation CQMs.

RESULTS

Among 178 practices, 39 were exemplars. Exemplars were more likely to be a Federally Qualified Health Center (69.2% vs 35.3%, p = 0.0006), have an underserved designation (69.2% vs 45.3%, p = 0.0083), and have higher percentage of patients with Medicaid (p < 0.0001). Exemplars reported greater use of cardiovascular disease registries (61.5% vs 29.5%,), standing orders (38.5 vs 22.3%) or electronic health record prompts (84.6% vs 49.6%) (all p < 0.05), were more likely to have medical home recognition (74.4% vs 43.2%, p = 0.0006), and reported greater implementation of building blocks of high-performing primary care: regular quality improvement team meetings (3.0 vs 2.2), patient experience survey (3.1 vs 2.2), and resources for patients to manage their health (3.0 vs 2.3). High improvers (n = 45) showed greater improvement implementing team-based care (32.8 vs 11.7, p = 0.0004) and population management (37.4 vs 20.5, p = 0.0057).

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple strategies-registries, prompts and protocols, patient self-management support, and patient-team partnership activities-were associated with delivering high-quality cardiovascular care over time, measured by CQMs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT02515578.

Using Provider Incentives and an Opt-Out Strategy in a Successful Quality Initiative to Increase Chlamydia Screening

BACKGROUND

Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is a highly prevalent sexually transmitted infection in adolescents that can lead to serious complications. San Francisco has one of the highest rates of CT infections in the United States. At baseline, screening rates at the Children's Health Center were significantly below national and network levels. This project aimed to increase screening rates for female patients age 16-24 from 29.2% to 44% in an 18-month period.

METHODS

The organization engaged providers, residents, and nursing staff to understand the root causes and choose the screening approach. The following strategies were used to implement this approach in primary and urgent care: (1) universal urine collection, (2) provider and staff education, and (3) adoption of faculty Maintenance of Certification (MOC) credit and resident physician financial incentives.

RESULTS

The annual screening rate for CT in primary care female patients 16-24 years old increased from 29.2% to 61.5% in 18 months, and improved to 71.2% one year after the project. Screening rates for female patients over age 15 seen in the colocated urgent care also increased significantly. The research team found no instances of false positive results and had 4 positive results in high-risk patients who initially reported abstinence.

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention design and engagement of stakeholders with incentives was associated with significant and sustainable improvements in the CT screening rate for female adolescent primary care patients. This work shows how universal opt-out screening can be a sustainable and effective method to address common barriers to increasing screening for CT in adolescents.

Effectiveness of a Quality Improvement Intervention to Improve Rates of Routine Chlamydia Trachomatis Screening in Female Adolescents Seeking Primary Preventive Care

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of a multicomponent quality improvement (QI) intervention on Chlamydia trachomatis screening for young women in primary care.

DESIGN

Observational cohort analysis.

SETTING

Urban primary care site providing adolescent primary and confidential sexual health care.

PARTICIPANTS

Female adolescents aged 15-19 years.

INTERVENTIONS

From December 2016 to April 2018, we designed and implemented a multiphase QI intervention. The final intervention, beginning March 2017, consisted of the following at all adolescent well visits: (1) dual registration for well and confidential sexual health encounters; (2) urine collection during the rooming process; and (3) electronic health record-based prompts for chlamydia screening.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Annual chlamydia screening rates before and after the intervention, with a goal of achieving a relative increase of 10%.

RESULTS

There were 1550 well adolescent encounters from December 2016 to April 2018. The preimplementation chlamydia screening rate among 15- to 19-year-old female adolescents was 312/757 (41.2%) (95% confidence interval, 20.9%-61.5%). Postintervention, this increased to 397/793 (50.0%) (95% confidence interval, 28.6%-71.5%; P < .001). The clinic chlamydia test positivity rate remained stable, at 10.7% and 11.1% in the pre- and postintervention periods, respectively. There was no significant change in median visit length in the pre- (79.2 minutes; interquartile range, 59.5-103.3) and postintervention periods (80.4 minutes; interquartile range, 61.7-102.8; P = .63).

CONCLUSION

This practice-based QI intervention resulted in a statistically significant 21% relative increase in annual Chlamydia trachomatis screening rates among female adolescents, without lengthening median visit time.