Assessment of chemical contamination by cancer drugs during use of the RIVATM compounding robot: A pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Many hospitals are now investing in robotic compounding system for the preparation of cytotoxic agents. The objective of the present study was to describe contamination by cytotoxics inside and outside the RIVATM robot (ARxIUM, Winnipeg, Canada).

MATERIAL & METHODS

We applied a risk analysis to determine which locations inside and outside the compounding robot should be monitored. Samples were collected by swabbing with a wet swab (using 0.1 mL of sterile water) before the robots was cleaned. Ten cytotoxics compounded with the robot were screened for using LC-MS/MS. We determined the percentage contamination rates inside (CRin) and outside (CRout) the robot and the amounts of each contaminant (in ng/cm²). If a sample was found to be positive, a corrective action was implemented.

RESULTS

Our risk analysis highlighted 10 locations inside the robot and 7 outside. Ten sampling campaigns (10 samples per campaign) were performed. The mean CRin (40%) was significantly higher than the mean CRout (2%; p < 10-4). Gemcitabine and cyclophosphamide were the main contaminants. After the implementation of corrective measures (such as daily cleaning with SDS/isopropyl alcohol), the CRin fell from 60% to 10%.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

The frequency of contamination was lower for robotic compounding than for manual compounding in an isolator. However, robotic compounding tended to generated larger mean amounts of contaminant; this was related to incidents such as splashing when syringes were disposed of after the compounding. The implementation of corrective actions effectively reduced the CRs. Further longer-term studies are required to confirm these results.

Using simulation to improve pharmacy operators' handling of cytotoxic spills

INTRODUCTION

International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners guidelines recommend having standard operating procedures (SOPs) and initial and yearly retraining programs on cytotoxic spill handling for pharmacy operators (POs). This study aimed to create a simulation-based training (SBT) program on this subject and evaluate its impact on POs' real-life performance.

METHODS

Randomly formed pairs of POs underwent a 2.5-hour training program, including two simulation exercises (a broken cytotoxic vial on the floor and a leaking cytotoxic bag) in a simulated pharmacy production unit. Each participant applied the cytotoxic spill handling SOPs. The PO and trainer-pharmacist did a debriefing after each exercise. Satisfaction was recorded on a 0-to-100% scale. A 20-item questionnaire assessed general knowledge about cytotoxic spill handling before and after the training. One month before and one month after the training, the POs underwent a real-life test when the trainer broke a fake cytotoxic vial in the cytotoxic storage area. Their performance in applying the SOPs was assessed on a 20-point checklist, and the time to handle the spill was recorded.

RESULTS

Twelve POs participated. Mean satisfaction score was 98.9%. Mean knowledge score improved from 10.8/20 (SD = 2.0) before training to 14.5/20 (SD = 1.6) after training (p < 0.05). Mean real-life SOP performance improved from 78.6% (SD = 7.4%) to 97.1% (SD = 5.2%) (p < 0.05). Mean time to handle cytotoxic spills decreased from 17.3 minutes (SD = 3.6 minutes) to 11.9 minutes (SD = 1.5 minutes) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

POs improved their knowledge and real-life competencies for handling cytotoxic spills. This training will be included in POs' initial and continuing training programs.

Evaluation of the risk of occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs in healthcare sector: part II - the application of the FMECA method to compare manual vs automated preparation

Healthcare workers handling antineoplastic drugs (ADs) in preparation units run the risk of occupational exposure to contaminated surfaces and associated mutagenic, teratogenic, and oncogenic effects of those drugs. To minimise this risk, automated compounding systems, mainly robots, have been replacing manual preparation of intravenous drugs for the last 20 years now, and their number is on the rise. To evaluate contamination risk and the quality of the working environment for healthcare workers preparing ADs, we applied the Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) method to compare the acceptable risk level (ARL), based on the risk priority number (RPN) calculated from five identified failure modes, with the measured risk level (MRL). The model has shown higher risk of exposure with powdered ADs and containers not protected by external plastic shrink film, but we found no clear difference in contamination risk between manual and automated preparation. This approach could be useful to assess and prevent the risk of occupational exposure for healthcare workers coming from residual cytotoxic contamination both for current handling procedures and the newly designed ones. At the same time, contamination monitoring data can be used to keep track of the quality of working conditions by comparing the observed risk profiles with the proposed ARL. Our study has shown that automated preparation may have an upper hand in terms of safety but still leaves room for improvement, at least in our four hospitals.

A simple and inexpensive method to monitor and minimize exposure from manipulation of cytotoxic drugs

Pharmacy personnel that manipulate cytotoxic drugs are under continuous exposure risk. Therefore, training and strict adherence to recommended practices should always be promoted. The main objective of this study was to develop and apply a safe, effective and low-cost method for the training and assessment of the safe handling of cytotoxic drugs, using commercially available tonic water. To evaluate the potential of tonic water as a replacement marker for quinine hydrochloride, deliberate spills of 1 mL of four different tonic waters (one coloured and three non-coloured) were analysed under ultraviolet light (300-400 nm). The pigmented sample did not produce fluorescence under ultraviolet (UV) light. The three commercially available tonic waters that exhibited fluorescence were further analysed by UV/Vis spectrophotometry (300-500 nm). Afterwards, a protocol of simulated manipulation of cytotoxic drugs was developed and applied to 12 pharmacy technicians, that prepared 24 intravenous bags according to recommended routine procedures using tonic water. Participants responded to a brief questionnaire to evaluate the adequacy and applicability of the activity. Seven of the participants had spillages during manipulation, the majority of which recorded during manipulation with needles. All participants scored the tonic water manipulation simulation with 4 or 5 points for simplicity, efficiency and feasibility. The obtained results suggest that tonic water can be used to simulate the manipulation of cytotoxic drugs in training and assessment programs. By using this replacement marker for quinine hydrochloride, it is possible to perform a more cost-effective, yet equally effective, assessment.

Evaluation of Closed System Transfer Devices in Preventing Chemotherapy Agents Contamination During Compounding Process-A Single and Comparative Study in China

Aim

We performed a comparative study to investigate the efficacy of closed system transfer devices (CSTDs) on the safe handling of injectable hazardous drugs (HDs).

Methods

The exposure assessments of cyclophosphamide and cytarabine were performed under traditional or CSTDs. For preparation activity, chemotherapy contamination samples on protective equipment (such as gloves and masks) were collected. The contamination analysis was performed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). A 6-item form was distributed monthly (form M1-M6, total 6 months) to assess the pharmacists' experience on ergonomics, encumbrance, and safety impression.

Results

Totally, 96 wiping samples were collected throughout the study. The numbers of contaminated cyclophosphamide samples reduced under CSTD were -37.8, -41.6, -67.7, -47.3, and -22.9% and cytarabine were -12.3, -12.1, -20.6, -69.6, and -56.7% for left countertop, right countertop, medial glass, air-intake vent and door handle, as compared to traditional devices. The reduction was similar to pharmacist devices, i.e., -48.2 and -50.0% for masks and gloves cyclophosphamide contamination, -18.0 and -42.4% for cytarabine. This novel system could improve contamination on dispensing table, transfer container, and dispensing basket by -16.6, -6.0, and -22.3% for cyclophosphamide and -28.5, -22.5, and -46.2% for cytarabine. A high level of satisfaction was consistently associated with ergonomics for CSTD during the compounding process. Meanwhile, a slightly decreased satisfaction on ergonomics, encumbrance, and safety impression was observed for the traditional system between M2 and M3.

Conclusion

Closed system transfer devices are offering progressively more effective alternatives to traditional ones and consequently decrease chemotherapy exposure risk on isolator surfaces.

[Pressure Compatibility Test of Closed System Drug Transfer Devices for 71 Anticancer Drugs]

Occupational exposure to anticancer drugs may increase the risk of cancer and the risk of miscarriage and stillbirth, and cause other adverse events such as hypersensitivity reactions, skin/mucous reactions, and digestive symptoms. Several studies have investigated the use of closed-system drug-transfer devices (CSTDs) to reduce the environmental pollution by hazardous drugs. However, few reports have verified whether CSTDs contain the hazardous drugs within the vials. The BD PhaSeal^TM System is a CSTD that is frequently used in Japan. However, the fit of each anti-cancer drug vial has not been investigated. We investigated the fit of 71 major anti-cancer drug vials and protectors released and frequently used in Japan by means of a pressure compatibility test that we developed. The pressure compatibility test involved attaching a three-way stopcock to a Luer lock syringe and attaching an injector in line with the syringe. The pressure tubing was connected to the other side of the three-way stopcock and connected to the pressure inlet of the pressure gauge. The pressure in the anti-cancer drug vial was raised to 100 kPa and connected/disconnected repeatedly. If the pressure fluctuation during the 10th connection was within 6%, it was defined as "no change", and the compatibility of the protector and the vial was evaluated. The median pressure reduction rates at the 10th connection ranged from -1.98% to -4.95%. All drugs surveyed had an error rate within 6%. The BD PhaSeal^TM Protector was shown to be compatible with the 71 anti-cancer drugs we surveyed.

Application of the 2015 proposed NIOSH vapor containment performance protocol for closed system transfer devices used during pharmacy compounding and administration of hazardous drugs

PURPOSE

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) released a proposed protocol in 2015 to evaluate the vapor containment abilities of closed system transfer device technologies in order to provide meaningful comparisons between products. This study assessed the vapor containment ability of closed system transfer devices when following the methodology as outlined by the 2015 NIOSH proposed protocol.

METHODS

This study evaluated six closed system transfer device brands following the draft NIOSH vapor containment protocol. The testing evaluated each closed system transfer device brand during both compounding (Task 1) and administration (Task 2). Five pre-specified steps for each task were repeated for a total of four manipulations per device. The Thermo Scientific™ MIRAN SapphIRe XL Infrared Analyzer was used to detect isopropyl alcohol vapor levels after each step.

RESULTS

For Task 1, two closed system transfer device products (PhaSeal™ and Equashield®) adequately contained the isopropyl alcohol vapor and passed the predefined testing criteria. The same two products, plus one additional product (ChemoLock™), contained the vapor for Task 2 manipulations. Based on the results of this study, only two out of the six closed system transfer device brands passed testing criteria for both tasks, functioning as truly closed systems.

CONCLUSION

To improve employee safety in chemotherapy preparation, closed system transfer devices that demonstrate no leakage should be the preferred choices of healthcare systems. In this study, PhaSeal™ and Equashield® proved to be adequately closed in both Task 1 and Task 2, while ChemoLock™ proved to be closed in Task 2 but not in Task 1. All other products failed both tasks when measuring for isopropyl alcohol vapor release.

Foreword

There is a significant body of evidence describing the benefits of using systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) agents, such as chemotherapy, biological, hormone and antibiotics, to treat people diagnosed with cancer (Cancer Research UK, 2017). However, the potential improvements in survival outcomes must be regularly weighed against the risk of adverse health effects associated with exposure to them. For patients, the risks are balanced against the need to treat the cancer. For health professionals, the risks simply result from the occupational exposure that can occur when caring for patients receiving these drugs. Collectively referred to as cytotoxic agents, SACTs are known to be toxic; they are considered carcinogenic to humans, and are classified as hazardous (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 2010).

A strategy for formulating regulation on CSTDs

This article identifies what steps need to be taken to ensure the mandatory use of closed system transfer devices by all health professionals involved in the hazardous drug journey.

Effectiveness of a Closed-System Transfer Device in Reducing Surface Contamination in a New Antineoplastic Drug-Compounding Unit: A Prospective, Controlled, Parallel Study

Background

The objective of this randomized, prospective and controlled study was to investigate the ability of a closed-system transfer device (CSTD; BD-Phaseal) to reduce the occupational exposure of two isolators to 10 cytotoxic drugs and compare to standard compounding devices.

Methods and Findings

The 6-month study started with the opening of a new compounding unit. Two isolators were set up with 2 workstations each, one to compound with standard devices (needles and spikes) and the other using the Phaseal system. Drugs were alternatively compounded in each isolator. Sampling involved wiping three surfaces (gloves, window, worktop), before and after a cleaning process. Exposure to ten antineoplastic drugs (cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, dacarbazine, 5-FU, methotrexate, gemcitabine, cytarabine, irinotecan, doxorubicine and ganciclovir) was assessed on wipes by LC-MS/MS analysis. Contamination rates were compared using a Chi² test and drug amounts by a Mann-Whitney test. Significance was defined for p<0.05. Overall contamination was lower in the “Phaseal” isolator than in the “Standard” isolator (12.24% vs. 26.39%; p < 0.0001) although it differed according to drug. Indeed, the contamination rates of gemcitabine were 49.3 and 43.4% (NS) for the Standard and Phaseal isolators, respectively, whereas for ganciclovir, they were 54.2 and 2.8% (p<0.0001). Gemcitabine amounts were 220.6 and 283.6 ng for the Standard and Phaseal isolators (NS), and ganciclovir amounts were 179.9 and 2.4 ng (p<0.0001).

Conclusion

This study confirms that using a CSTD may significantly decrease the chemical contamination of barrier isolators compared to standard devices for some drugs, although it does not eliminate contamination totally.

Impact of Handling Errors for Chemical Cross-contamination Risk for the Preparation of Parenteral Cytotoxic Drugs

The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk of chemical cross-contamination between preparations of cytotoxic drugs performed in hospital pharmacy. Simulation of handling process errors was performed with two selected tracers, thiamine and retinol to mimic hydrophilic and lipophilic cytotoxic drugs. Four types of handling errors were simulated: errors associated with the re-use of a disposable transfer device: syringe, spike and needle and errors associated with surface contamination such as the use of a contaminated pad. The results show rates of contamination above the limit of quantification with the re-use of a syringe, a needle or a spike. For example, with the thiamine solution at 50 mg/ml final concentration, the re-use of a spike led to a contamination of approximately 100 µl equivalent to 5 mg. By contrast, the use of a surface contaminated pad failed to detect a cross-contamination. Cross-contamination related to a contamination of surface by a cytotoxic drug represents a low risk. However, the re-use of a single medical device due to handling human error led to quantifiable risk of cross-contamination. Furthermore, this type of error is very difficult to detect and may be frequent enough to have potential impact on patient.

Treatment time, ease of use and cost associated with use of Equashield™, PhaSeal® , or no closed system transfer device for administration of cancer chemotherapy to a dog model

This prospective experimental simulation study evaluated the efficiency, ease of use (EOU) and cost of administering chemotherapy with two closed system transfer devices (CSTD, Equashield™ and PhaSeal^® ) and no CSTD. Forty-six veterinary technicians (VT) working in oncology specialty practices were timed during chemotherapy administration simulated with water and a model canine limb 10 times with each system and with no CSTD. EOU and likelihood of recommending each system were rated by VT using visual analog scales. Costs were obtained from veterinary distributors. Administration was fastest with Equashield™ (P = 0.0003), but the difference was not enough to affect case flow. Equashield™ was easier to use than PhaSeal^® or no CSTD (P = 0.002), however VT recommended both CSTD more strongly than no CSTD (P < 0.0001). Equashield™ cost less than PhaSeal^® but was sold only in bulk quantities. CSTD did not decrease efficiency in administering chemotherapy and were readily accepted by VT.

A review of the evidence for occupational exposure risks to novel anticancer agents – A focus on monoclonal antibodies

Introduction

Evidence of occupational exposure risks to novel anticancer agents is limited and yet to be formally evaluated from the Australian healthcare perspective.

Methods

From March to September 2013 medical databases, organizational policies, drug monographs, and the World Wide Web were searched for evidence relating to occupational exposure to monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins, gene therapies, and other unclassified novel anticancer agents.

Results

Australian legislation, national and international guidelines, and drug company information excluded novel agents or provided inconsistent risk assessments and safe handling recommendations. Monoclonal antibody guidelines reported conflicting information and were often divergent with available evidence and pharmacologic rationale demonstrating minimal internalisation ability and occupational exposure risk. Despite similar physiochemical, pharmacologic, and internalisation properties to monoclonal antibodies, fusion proteins were included in only a minority of guidelines. Clinical directives for the safe handling of gene therapies and live vaccines were limited, where available focusing on prevention against exposure and cross-contamination. Although mechanistically different, novel small molecule agents (proteasome inhibitors), possess similar physiochemical and internalisation properties to traditional cytotoxic agents warranting cytotoxic classification and handling.

Conclusion

Novel agents are rapidly emerging into clinical practice, and healthcare personnel have few resources to evaluate risk and provide safety recommendations. Novel agents possess differing physical, molecular and pharmacological profiles compared to traditional cytotoxic anticancer agents. Evaluation of occupational exposure risk should consider both toxicity and internalisation. Evidence-based guidance able to direct safe handling practices for novel anticancer agents across a variety of clinical settings is urgently required.

Reduction in Surface Contamination With Cyclophosphamide in 30 US Hospital Pharmacies Following Implementation of a Closed-System Drug Transfer Device

PURPOSE

In a follow-up to a previous study, surface contamination with the antineoplastic drug cyclophosphamide was compared in 30 US hospital pharmacies from 2004 to 2010 following preparation with standard drug preparation techniques or the PhaSeal closed system drug transfer device (CSTD).

METHODS

Wipe samples were taken from biological safety cabinet (BSC) surfaces, BSC airfoils (the front leading edge of the BSC), floors in front of BSCs, and countertops in the pharmacy, and they were analyzed for contamination with cyclophosphamide. Contamination was reassessed after a minimum of 6 months following the implementation of the CSTD. Surface contamination (ng/cm(2)) was compared between the 2 techniques and between the previous and current test periods and evaluated with the Kruskal-Wallis test.

RESULTS

With the use of CSTD compared to the standard preparation techniques, a significant reduction in levels of contamination with cyclophosphamide was observed (P < .0001). Median values for surface contamination with cyclophosphamide were reduced by 86% compared to 95% in the previous study.

CONCLUSIONS

The CSTD significantly reduced, but did not totally eliminate, surface contamination with cyclophosphamide. In addition to other protective measures, increased usage of CSTDs should be employed to help protect health care workers from exposure to hazardous drugs.

Impact and appreciation of two methods aiming at reducing hazardous drug environmental contamination: The centralization of the priming of IV tubing in the pharmacy and use of a closed-system transfer device

OBJECTIVES

The main objective was to evaluate the impact of two methods aiming at reducing hazardous drug environmental contamination: the centralization of the priming of IV tubing in the pharmacy and the use of a closed-system transfer device. The secondary objective was to evaluate the satisfaction of pharmacy technicians using a survey.

METHODS

Sites in the hematology-oncology satellite pharmacy and care unit were analyzed for the presence of cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide and methotrexate before and after the centralization of the priming of IV tubing in the pharmacy and before and after using a closed-system transfer device. The limits of detection for cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide and methotrexate were, respectively, of 0.0015 ng/cm(2), 0.0012 ng/cm(2) and 0.0060 ng/cm(2). The pharmacy technician satisfaction was evaluated using a questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 225 samples was quantified. After the centralization of priming in the pharmacy, no significant difference was found in the proportion of positive samples for cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide and methotrexate. Traces of cyclophosphamide found on the floor in patient care areas was significantly reduced (median[min-max] 0.08[0.06-0.09]ng/cm(2) vs. 0.03[0.02-0.05], p < 0.0001). After using a closed-system transfer device, a significant difference was found for the proportion of cyclophosphamide positive samples (15/45(33%) vs. 0/45(0%), p < 0.0001), but no significant difference was found for ifosfamide (12/45(27%) vs. 5/45(11%), p = 0.059) and methotrexate (1/45(2%) vs. 2/45(4%), p = 0.557). Pharmacy technicians raised issues following the centralization of priming (e.g. workload) and the use of closed-system transfer devices (e.g. spills, particles, workload and handling difficulties).

CONCLUSION

The centralization of the priming of IV tubing in the pharmacy reduced floor contamination in patient care areas without increasing surface contamination in the pharmacy. Closed-system transfer devices reduced contamination in pharmacy, but handling issues were raised by pharmacy technicians.

Leakage from closed-system transfer devices as detected by a radioactive tracer

PURPOSE

A study of leakage from selected closed-system transfer devices (CSTDs) under experimental conditions is described.

METHODS

Three CSTDs (the ChemoClave, OnGuard, and PhaSeal systems) were tested. Nine manufacturer-trained oncology pharmacists and pharmacy technicians volunteered to participate in an experiment to determine the degree of leakage of a liquid test agent (a radioactive technetium isotope [(99m)Tc] diluted in normal saline) during CSTD-assisted transfer of liquid from vials to syringes per standard practices. After such transfers, alcohol prep pads (n = 135 for each system) were used to wipe CSTD points of entry and assessed for the presence of (99m)Tc. Comparisons among participants and devices were conducted via analysis of variance (ANOVA), with the a priori level of significance set at 0.05.

RESULTS

ANOVA results indicated significant differences among devices in leakage of the test solution, with the PhaSeal device having the lowest geometric mean leakage (0.1 nL; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0-0.2 nL), followed by the OnGuard (1.5 nL; 95% CI, 1.1-1.9 nL) and ChemoClave (35.6 nL; 95% CI, 29.1-43.6 nL) devices; each pairwise comparison was significant (p < 0.001). Despite several major limitations, the research supports the use of CSTDs to help protect health care workers, as recommended by federal authorities and professional groups including the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

CONCLUSION

The volume of leakage was significantly less with PhaSeal than with OnGuard and ChemoClave when pharmacists and pharmacy technicians used the three CSTDs and (99m)Tc as a tracer.

Cost savings realized by use of the PhaSeal® closed-system transfer device for preparation of antineoplastic agents

Purpose

Medication cost is a major factor associated with increasing health care costs in the United States. Expenditures for prescription drugs in 2013 are estimated to be $283.7 billion. Closed system transfer devices are widely used for preparation of hazardous drugs. Reports indicate the Phaseal® closed system transfer device maintains sterility in vials for 7 days, suggesting the unused portion of single-use vials could be salvaged. This study was done to determine whether using a closed system transfer device to extend the beyond-use date of single-use vials of antineoplastic medications would result in a measurable cost saving.

Methods

A list of 25 drugs available in single-use vials, with a chemical stability of at least 48 hours, was compiled. Use of these agents was recorded during a 50-day period in April through June 2012. Use from a total of 296 vials of 21 antineoplastic agents was recorded. After allowing for the initial use of each vial, the mean potential percentage of drug waste was calculated to be 57.03%.

Results

Actual savings during the study period was $96,348.70. The pharmacy avoided nearly half of the potential waste and saved a mean of 29% of each vial. The cost-saving during the study period represents a $703,047.67 annual saving; which more than offsets the $106,556.55 the pharmacy spent for the Phaseal® system in 2012.

Conclusion

In addition to being a protective measure to reduce exposure to hazardous agents, use of the Phaseal® system results in a reduction in drug waste, and a noticeable cost saving for antineoplastic agents.

Occupational exposure to anti-cancer drugs: A review of effects of new technology

Because anti-cancer drugs are non-selective, they affect both cancerous and non-cancerous cells. Being carcinogenic and mutagenic, many anticancer drugs therefore present a major health risk to healthcare staff working with them. This paper reviews the means by which exposure to anti-cancer drugs in the workplace may be monitored, assessed and reduced. Both biological monitoring, using non-selective methods or compound-selective methods, and environmental monitoring have provided information on the nature and degree of exposure in the workplace. Pharmaceutical isolators, used for the compounding of cytotoxic IV infusions and the preparation of injectable drugs, provide a physical barrier between pharmacists and cytotoxic drugs and reduce direct exposure. However, the interior of isolators and the contents thereof (e.g. infusion bags and syringes) are readily contaminated by aerosols and spillages and afford a secondary source of exposure to pharmacists, nurses and cleaning staff. Closed system transfer devices (CSTDs), designed to prohibit the transfer of contaminants into the working environment during drug transfer between the vial and syringe, have been successful in further reducing, but not eliminating surface contamination. Given that the number of patients requiring treatment with chemotherapeutic agents is predicted to increase, further efforts to reduce occupational exposure to anti-cancer drugs, including the refinement and wider use of CTSDs, are recommended.

Association between occupational exposure and control measures for antineoplastic drugs in a pharmacy of a hospital

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between occupational contamination and exposure levels to antineoplastic drugs and the application of control measures in a hospital work environment.

METHODS

Wipe samples of equipments were collected at a hospital in Osaka Prefecture, Japan, from 2007 to 2011. These samples were subjected to measurements of cyclophosphamide (CP), gemcitabine (GEM), platinum-containing drugs (Pt), and fluorouracil (5FU). Additionally, 24-h urine samples were collected from pharmacists who handled antineoplastic drugs, which were analyzed for CP and alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine (AFBA). The application of control measures was scored according to a checklist, which consisted of the following five items: safety equipment and maintenance, training and documentation, devices for safe handling, personal protective equipment, and emergency care. The aim was to obtain a score of 80%.

RESULTS

The median CP, GEM, and 5FU concentrations of all wipe samples were significantly lower during the period when the mean score was >80% (attainment period) versus when the mean score was ≤80% (nonattainment period; all P < 0.001, Mann-Whitney's U-test). Additionally, the median urinary CP and AFBA concentrations of pharmacists during the attainment period tended to be lower than that of those during the nonattainment period (P = 0.061 and 0.061, respectively, using Mann-Whitney's U-test).

CONCLUSIONS

Contamination and levels of exposure to antineoplastic drugs decreased with a score higher than 80%. The scores of the items on the checklist appeared to adequately reflect the condition of the control measures, as increases in all five items were associated with reductions in the contamination by and levels of exposure to all drugs.

Chemical contamination during the preparation of cytotoxics: validation protocol for operators in hospital pharmacies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The chemical contamination during the preparation of cytotoxics remains a serious problem in hospital pharmacies and the operators could contribute to this risk during their manipulations. A validation protocol was developed using a non-toxic, highly detectable tracer, quinine dihydrochloride.

METHOD

Further, a method for a high recovery extraction and quantification of this marker, and a protocol covering the critical operations of cytotoxic preparation, was developed and validated. Various devices were used to fill the syringes and perfusion bags. All the filled containers and used materials were collected at the end of the protocol and the tracer was extracted in water. The contaminated water was analyzed by fluorimetry. The number of spots on the working pads was counted under ultraviolet light. During a total of 28 sessions, the procedure was applied by 20 different operators.

RESULTS

The mean cumulated quantities of contamination were 6.2 µL (0.6-23.8) and >10 spots (0-20), which was considered as high. No correlation was observed between the contamination rate and the operator's experience.

CONCLUSION

This validation protocol facilitates controlling the operators' working 'cleanliness' and helps to improve the initial and continuing training. This simple test presents an effective answer for the important issue of the chemical safety of operators.

Verification of surface contamination of Japanese cyclophosphamide vials and an example of exposure by handling

Purpose: Cyclophosphamide (CP) contamination has been detected in Japanese hospitals. In other countries, the surface contamination of CP vials has been reported; however, the manufacturing process of Japanese CP vials is unknown, so the conditions are not necessarily the same as in other countries. This study aimed to establish whether vial surface contamination also occurs in Japan.

Method: Contamination of vial surfaces was examined with a wipe test. Urine samples were taken from a pharmacist, engaged solely in dispensing work, for 29 h. It was also investigated whether CP vials were dispensed during the urine sampling period. In addition, vial surfaces, purposely coated with CP and then washed, were examined using wipe tests.

Result: CP was detected at 30–60% in vials, which was 11–62 ng (0.10–0.54 ng/cm2). One of the urine samples was contaminated (CP 13.5 ng); this was taken on Day 2 (11:35 AM). CP was not detected among the washed vials.

Discussion: This study shows that the surface of Japanese CP vials was contaminated and that it was probable that healthcare workers were exposed to CP. CP absorption by the pharmacist was probably due to dermal uptake while dispensing. Washing the vial is considered effective to avoid CP exposure. Manufacturers should be more proactive to prevent contamination and healthcare workers should comply with exposure prevention rules. Cytotoxic drugs should be included in institution monitoring lists.

Multiple-test assessment of devices to protect healthcare workers when administering cytotoxic drugs to patients

Purpose: Evaluation of containment safety devices designed and introduced to protect preparers and administrators of hazardous drugs, through a multiple-test assessment.

Methods: Six devices were compared: (1) Kis1 gravity-fed infusion set (Doran International, France), (2) Tevadaptor Spike Port Adapter (Teva Pharma AG, France), (3) Phaseal Infusion Adapter C100 (Carmel Pharma AB, France), (4) Codan Connect Z (Codan, France), (5) Pchimx with or without a cap (Doran International, France), and (6) Clave extension set 011-H1225 with or without Spiros (Hospira, France). Assessment of exposure to hazardous drugs was performed using quinine as fluorescent marker. Mechanical tests included tightness, tension tests, and estimation of the force required to connect the infusion device to the bag. Ergonomic tests were performed by six pharmaceutical technicians. Microbiological contamination was tested with media-fill, on connected bag.

Results: No cytotoxic contamination was detected when using Phaseal, Tevadaptor or the Clave extension set with Spiros, Pchimx with a cap or Connect Z devices. For mechanical tests, all devices complied with the norm. Microbiological growth was observed neither in bags nor in tubings. The ergonomic study revealed differences between the devices for potential cytotoxic contamination risk only, but not for handling.

Conclusions. The use of containment safety devices offers improved handling conditions of hazardous compounds. As this study takes various selection criteria into account, its results offer assistance in choosing the most suitable device.

Safe handling of parenteral cytotoxics: recommendations for ontario

In caring for patients with cancer, health care workers may be exposed to cytotoxic agents. Recommendations are needed to mitigate potential risks for cancer and adverse reproductive outcomes associated with exposure.

Occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs in four Italian health care settings

Exposure assessment of health care workers to antineoplastic drugs (ADs) is still an open issue since new, critical, and emerging factors may put pharmacists who prepare hazardous drugs or nurses who administer anti cancer agents to an increased risk of developing adverse health effects. Overall, eight pharmacies and nine patient areas have been surveyed in this study. Wipe and pad samples were experienced during the surveillance program in four Italian health care settings. Urine samples were collected from workers handling ADs. Cyclophosphamide (CP), ifosfamide (IF), and gemcitabine (GEM) were detected in all the work environments by using a LC-MS/MS method-based capable of analysing all the three drugs simultaneously. In total, 54% of wipe samples were positive for at least one drug and 19% of pad samples were shown to be contaminated by cyclophosphamide. Pharmacies were generally more contaminated than patient areas with the exception of one site where a nurse had an acute exposure during the cleaning-up of an hazardous drug solution spill. In total, 22 urine samples collected from pharmacists and 78 urine samples from nurses had no detectable concentrations of any antineoplastic drugs. Despite the adherence to the recommended safety practices residue contamination on surfaces and floors has continued to be assessed in all the investigated sites.

Evaluation of antineoplastic drug exposure of health care workers at three university-based US cancer centers

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated health care worker exposure to antineoplastic drugs.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study examined environmental samples from pharmacy and nursing areas. A 6-week diary documented tasks involving those drugs. Urine was analyzed for two specific drugs, and blood samples were analyzed by the comet assay.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight exposed and 53 nonexposed workers were studied. Exposed workers recorded 10,000 drug-handling events during the 6-week period. Sixty percent of wipe samples were positive for at least one of the five drugs measured. Cyclophosphamide was most commonly detected, followed by 5-fluorouracil. Three of the 68 urine samples were positive for one drug. No genetic damage was detected in exposed workers using the comet assay.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite following recommended safe-handling practices, workplace contamination with antineoplastic drugs in pharmacy and nursing areas continues at these locations.

Association between occupational exposure levels of antineoplastic drugs and work environment in five hospitals in Japan

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the measurement of contamination by antineoplastic drugs for safer handling of such drugs by medical workers. We investigated the relationship between the contamination level of antineoplastic drugs and the conditions of their handling.

METHODS

Air samples and wipe samples were collected from equipment in the preparation rooms of five hospitals (hospitals A-E). These samples were subjected to measurement of the amounts of cyclophosphamide (CPA), fluorouracil (5FU), gemcitabine (GEM), and platinum-containing drugs (Pt). Twenty-four-hour urine samples were collected from the pharmacists who handled or audited, the antineoplastic drugs were analyzed for CPA and Pt.

RESULTS

Pt was detected from air samples inside BSC in hospital B. Antineoplastic drugs were detected from wipe samples of the BSC in hospitals A, B, D, and E and of other equipment in the preparation rooms in hospitals A, B, C, and D. Cyclophosphamide and 5FU were detected from wipe samples of the air-conditioner filter in hospital A, and CPA was detected from that in hospital D. Cyclophosphamide was detected from urine samples of workers in hospitals B, D, and E.

CONCLUSION

The contamination level of antineoplastic drugs was suggested to be related with the amount of drugs handled, cleaning methods of the equipment, and the skill level of the technique of maintaining negative pressure inside a vial. In order to reduce the contamination and exposure to antineoplastic drugs in the hospital work environment very close to zero, comprehensive safety precautions, including adequate mixing and cleaning methods was required in addition to BSC and closed system device.

Reduction of workplace contamination with platinum-containing cytostatic drugs in a veterinary hospital by introduction of a closed system

The objective of this study was to determine the level of workplace contamination with platinum-containing cytostatic drugs in a veterinary hospital. A closed chemotherapy application system was then added to the safety regimen. Workplace contamination was measured over a nine-month period by taking wipe samples from seven locations. Before the introduction of the closed system, amounts of platinum were detected at four locations. After the introduction of the closed system, there was a temporary increase in contamination at two locations, followed by an overall reduction in contamination by the end of the study period.

Reduction in surface contamination with antineoplastic drugs in 22 hospital pharmacies in the US following implementation of a closed-system drug transfer device

PURPOSE

Surface contamination with the antineoplastic drugs cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and 5-fluorouracil was compared in 22 US hospital pharmacies following preparation with standard drug preparation techniques or the PhaSeal® closed-system drug transfer device (CSTD).

METHODS

Wipe samples were taken from biological safety cabinet (BSC) surfaces, BSC airfoils, floors in front of BSCs, and counters and analyzed for contamination with cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and 5-fluorouracil. Contamination was reassessed several months after the implementation of the CSTD. Surface contamination (ng/cm(2)) was compared between the two techniques and evaluated with the Signed Rank Test.

RESULTS

Using the CSTD compared to the standard preparation techniques, a significant reduction in levels of contamination was observed for all drugs (cyclophosphamide: p < 0.0001; ifosfamide: p < 0.001; 5-fluorouracil: p < 0.01). Median values for surface contamination with cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and 5-fluorouracil were reduced by 95%, 90%, and 65%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the CSTD significantly reduces surface contamination when preparing cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and 5-fluorouracil as compared to standard drug preparation techniques.

Use of a closed system device to reduce occupational contamination and exposure to antineoplastic drugs in the hospital work environment

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the preset study was to evaluate the applicability of a closed system device to protect against occupational contamination and exposure to antineoplastic drugs in the work environment of a hospital.

METHODS

We compared the contamination by and exposure to cyclophosphamide (CPA) between a conventional mixing method and a mixing method using a closed system device. Wipe samples in the preparation room, gloves samples and 24-h urine samples of pharmacists preparing antineoplastic drugs were collected. Working surfaces inside the biological safety cabinet (BSC), front side of the air grilles of the BSC, stainless steel trays, working table and floor were wiped. At first, sample collection was done on 5 days over an interval of 2 weeks using the conventional mixing method. After 2 weeks training for using the closed system device, sample collection was done 5 days over an interval of 2 weeks using the closed system device.

RESULTS

When pharmacists prepared antineoplastic drugs by the conventional method, CPA was detected from all wipe samples, and the mean and median concentrations of CPA were 1.0 and 0.16 ng cm(-2), respectively (range was from 0.0095 to 27 ng cm(-2)). When pharmacists prepared antineoplastic drugs with a closed system device, CPA was detected from 75% of the wipe samples at mean and median concentrations of 0.18 and 0.0013 ng cm(-2), respectively (the range was from lower than detection limit to 4.4 ng cm(-2)). Using the closed system device significantly reduced the surface contamination of CPA for all wipe sampling points in the preparation room (Mann-Whitney's U-test). The range of CPA of glove samples used in the conventional method and closed system device ranged from lower than detection limit to 3200 ng per glove-pair and from lower than detection limit to 740 ng per glove-pair, respectively. Using the closed system device significantly reduced the gloves contamination of CPA (Mann-Whitney's U-test). The range of urinary CPA of six pharmacists preparing the antineoplastic drugs with the conventional method and closed system device ranged from lower than detection limit to 170 ng day(-1) and from lower than detection limit to 15 ng day(-1), respectively. Using the closed system device significantly reduced the amount of urinary CPA in pharmacists preparing the antineoplastic drugs (Wilcoxon's signed ranks test).

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that a closed system device can reduce occupational contamination and exposure to antineoplastic drugs in the hospital work environment.

Evaluation of surface contamination in a hospital hematology—oncology pharmacy

Objective. To describe environmental contamination with hazardous drugs in a hospital pharmacy setting before and after reorganizing a hematology— oncology satellite pharmacy.

Methods. This is a descriptive study of surface contamination with cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and methotrexate in two hematology—oncology satellite pharmacies. In order to measure surface contamination with hazardous drugs, samples from four distinct measurement sites within the pharmacy were taken in each of the two phases (pre-and postphases) using a sampling procedure and an analytical method modified from Larson et al.

Results. A total of 133 samples from four measurement sites were taken and analyzed over the course of the study (specifically 60 prephase samples and 73 postphase samples). The study showed a significant increase in the number of positive samples (from 66.7% to 90.4%, p<0.001) from the pre- to the postphase. The increase, however, is only significant in terms of the location where completed preparations were placed after they had come out from under the hood (from 0/15 to 21/28, p<0.001) and the work surface (from 8/15 to 15/15, p = 0.006) and only in terms of ifosfamide. Furthermore, for the other sites studied, the number of positive samples remained unchanged between the pre- and postphase. A statistically significant difference between the pre- and postphase was observed in terms of ifosfamide for three of the four measurement sites studied and methotrexate for one of the four sites. Average concentrations were higher in the post phase in three of the four cases.

Conclusion. This study describes environmental contamination with hazardous drugs in a hospital pharmacy setting before and after reorganizing a hematology—oncology satellite pharmacy. The study showed that a refitting of the hemato-oncology pharmacy is not a sufficient strategy to reduce the environmental contamination by ifosfamide because a significant increase in the number of positive samples from the pre- to the postphase have been observed. Many factors can contribute to influence the contamination of hazardous drugs such as the workflow and the training of the personal. Continuous environmental surveillance of hazardous drugs is required to document traces and help reduce risks. J Oncol Pharm Practice (2009) 15: 53—61.

Studies on the decontamination of surfaces exposed to cytotoxic drugs in chemotherapy workstations

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the removal and deactivation of cytotoxic contamination from surfaces of a pharmaceutical isolator workstation.

METHODS

Three marker cytotoxic drugs were evaluated in three phases using decontamination technologies currently available in the pharmaceutical and healthcare environments. Phase I investigated the physical removal of contamination by detergents. Phase II and III investigated the effectiveness of detergents and Vaporised Hydrogen Peroxide (VHP) in degrading cytotoxic drugs, respectively.

RESULTS

5-Flurouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide were removed from a surface by wiping with detergents. VHP and alkaline detergents caused degradation of doxorubicin. The observed effect with detergent cleaning was pH dependent, but neither of the technologies applied had any effect on the chemical stability of 5-flurouracil and cyclophosphamide under the conditions tested.

Hazardous Anticancer Drugs in Health Care: Environmental Exposure Assessment

Exposure of healthcare workers to anticancer drugs became problematic in the 1970s. Shortly thereafter, studies began documenting exposure of healthcare workers to these drugs. Investigations employing biological markers, such as urine mutagenicity, chromosomal aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges, and micronuclei, demonstrated associations between occupational exposures and elevated marker levels. Other analytical methods emerged to monitor workplaces where drugs were handled. These contemporary studies uncovered widespread contamination of drugs on work surfaces, trace amounts in air samples, and their presence in the urine of workers. Vials containing these drugs are often contaminated with the drug when they are shipped. Most workplace surfaces are contaminated with the drugs being prepared and used in that area. Other anticancer/hazardous drugs would most likely be used in these areas. The interior surfaces of biological safety cabinets and isolators, floors, countertops, carts, storage bins, waste containers, treatment areas, tabletops, chairs, linen, and other items are all potential sources of exposure to anticancer drugs. Patient body fluids contain the drugs and/or metabolites, often more biologically active than the parent compounds. An exposure assessment of areas where anticancer/hazardous drugs are handled must consider every potential source and route of exposure. Data from surface contamination and inhalation studies suggest that dermal exposure is the primary route of exposure. Assessment of exposure is the first step in providing a safe work environment for these workers. However, because of the many drugs to which they are exposed, any assessment can only be an estimation of the overall exposure.