International Mentoring Programs: Leadership Opportunities to Enhance Worldwide Pharmacy Practice

A scoping review of mentorship in allied health: Attributes, programs and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Mentorship is a mutually beneficial voluntary relationship between mentor and mentee. In principle, the mentee trusts in the mentor for guiding career development and acquiring new knowledge and skills while the mentor finds giving back to the profession rewarding. Mentorship is beneficial at every career stage, but little is known about current programs and processes.

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature about mentorship in allied health to inform programs and practices in occupational therapy. Scoping focused on barriers, facilitators and reported outcomes of programs and attributes of mentors and mentees.

DATA SOURCES

A search was applied to six databases on 8 February 2022 in Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, PUBMED and CINAHL Complete. Search terms were developed in consultation with an academic librarian and using the population, concept and context mnemonic.

METHODS

We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Data extraction forms were piloted with two reviewers and dual extraction occurred with a portion of papers. Where conflicts arose, discussion occurred until a consensus was reached.

FINDINGS

Sixty-two papers were included from eleven countries. The papers arose from ten allied health disciplines, with five in occupational therapy. One-on-one mentoring was most common followed by groups and the use of online platforms. Structured approaches were often used, with the support of professional associations. Trust and willingness to share expertise were required attributes of mentors. Mentees appreciate self-selecting their mentor and having protected time for mentorship.

CONCLUSION AND SIGNIFICANCE

This synthesis provides a description of the available literature on mentorship in allied health. Benefits of mentorship were recorded with the acquisition of skills and knowledge being the most prominent. This synthesis provides ideas for future development and refinement of mentorship in occupational therapy.

Insight into development of a mentorship program in a professional pharmacy organization

INTRODUCTION

The American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Pharmacy Practice Section appointed a task force charged with developing a formal, national mentorship program for association section members. This manuscript provides insight into the creation of a mentorship program in a professional organization.

METHODS

Eighteen task force volunteers were divided into four sub-teams, along with a chair and vice chair. Sub-team responsibilities were segmented into the following: (1) mission and vision development, (2) structure and content, (3) assessment and impact, and (4) dissemination and scholarship. Task force members were surveyed to generate recommendations for creating a formal mentorship program within a professional organization and reflect on the process.

RESULTS

Seven of 14 eligible task force members completed the questionnaire (50% response rate). Most participants were mid-career, involved in a range of development aspects, and represented both committee members and leadership within the task force. The average time commitment was 15-19 hours over the year. The most common resource utilized was published literature and guidance documents. Identified needs included validated assessment tools, a wider range of exemplary programs to review, and guidance on broader organizational support. Strengths included organization and sub-team structure. Areas for improvement included coordination between sub-teams and resources available. Participants noted the challenges of creating a program to meet the diverse needs of a large membership.

CONCLUSIONS

This manuscript demonstrates the feasibility and evidence-based approach in creation of a mentorship program within a national organization.

Reflections of mentors and mentees on a national mentoring programme for pharmacists in the United Kingdom: An examination into organisational culture and systems

BACKGROUND

There is no accepted or consistent model for delivering mentoring programmes, manifesting in some debate surrounding the ideal conducive system. Mentorship structures and culture within pharmacy can be advanced by researching experiences of mentors and mentees.

OBJECTIVE

To explore lived experiences of participants in a nationwide mentoring programme in relation to motivations and barriers associated with engaging with mentoring, and what system changes and organisational culture shift could further support mentoring for pharmacy professionals.

METHODS

This study adopted a constructivist research paradigm, with a qualitative design to focus on how participants interpreted the world and their experiences. Verbatim transcripts of recordings were examined using deductive and inductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Participants in twenty one-to-one interviews appreciated the programme's allowance for organic relationships to occur, its contribution towards advancing the profession forward, its flexibility, and available resources. They discussed training needs and a more formal onboarding process into the programme that facilitated greater awareness of resources, as well as the need to evaluate and tweak it. System changes were highlighted so that mentoring can be part of the organisational culture, such as incorporating mentoring in job descriptions to increase capacity, senior members of the profession acting as role models, and linking mentoring to existing education and development structures.

CONCLUSION

Data demonstrated the need for formal structure but that which allowed for informal and organic relationships to develop. It is paramount for sponsoring organisations to provide resources and continuously monitor the program. The rich information gathered on administrative support and structure of a mentoring programme, along with its organisational facets, should help organisations when implementing similar initiatives. An organisation sponsoring or administering a mentoring programme must take actions that help codify its mentoring culture and its advocacy of mentoring as key to advancement for its profession's members.

Positioning global pharmacy research partnerships to advance health equity

Interest in global pharmacy research partnerships is growing, and many Schools and Colleges of Pharmacy are looking to expand their footprint in the global health arena. This will create opportunities for increased collaboration and synergy, but there will also be concerns for potential duplication and fragmentation. Such research partnerships also present unique opportunities for addressing unmet medication-related needs of populations around the word, especially for vulnerable populations living both in high income countries (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Pharmacy leaders and researchers engaged in global health partnerships or planning to start one can draw important lessons from other global health partnerships but also by studying the historical context and evolution of global health initiatives. To be meaningful, global pharmacy research partnerships must be grounded in local contexts and be sensitive to the myriad influences and actors that may determine success of their research endeavors, including health interventions. A deliberate and thoughtful investment in mentorship and faculty development for LMIC collaborators are also essential ingredients for sustainability of global research partnerships.