Implementation of the Procalcitonin Assay in a Rural Hospital

Clinical utility of procalcitonin in implementation of procalcitonin-guided antibiotic stewardship in the South-East Asia and India: evidence and consensus-based recommendations

INTRODUCTION

The South-East Asian (SEA) region and India are highly susceptible to antibiotic resistance, which is caused due to lack of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) knowledge, uncontrolled use of antibiotics, and poor infection control. Nonadherence to national/local guidelines, developed to combat antimicrobial resistance, is a major concern. A virtual advisory board was conducted to understand the current AMS standards and challenges in its implementation in these regions.

AREAS COVERED

Procalcitonin (PCT)-guided antibiotic use was discussed in various clinical conditions across initiation, management, and discontinuation stages. Most experts strongly recommended using PCT-driven antibiotic therapy among patients with lower respiratory tract infections, sepsis, and COVID-19. However, additional research is required to understand the optimal use of PCT in patients with organ transplantation and cancer patients with febrile neutropenia. Implementation of the solutions discussed in this review can help improve PCT utilization in guiding AMS in these regions and reducing challenges.

EXPERT OPINION

Experts strongly support the inclusion of PCT in AMS. They believe that PCT in combination with other clinical data to guide antibiotic therapy may result in more personalized and precise targeted antibiotic treatment. The future of PCT in antibiotic treatment is promising and may result in effective utilization of this biomarker.

Procalcitonin Monitoring and Antibiotic Duration in Presumed Lower Respiratory Tract Infections: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Across the Veterans Health Administration

Background

Randomized controlled trials have shown that procalcitonin-guided algorithms can reduce antibiotic duration for lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs). The goal of this study was to compare antibiotic duration for LRTIs with and without procalcitonin testing in real-life practice.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included all acute care hospital admissions for presumed LRTIs between 1/2018 and 12/2021 at 81 Veterans Affairs facilities with on-site procalcitonin testing. The exposure was procalcitonin testing; the primary outcome was antibiotic duration. We used 1:1 nearest-neighbor propensity score matching to estimate the difference in outcome between procalcitonin-tested and nontested patients.

Results

A total of 35 610 patients with LRTIs were included (6015 [16.9%] with procalcitonin testing; 29 595 [83.1%] without testing). In tested patients, the median number of procalcitonin levels checked (interquartile range) was 2 (1-3). The mean antibiotic duration was 10.0 days in the procalcitonin group compared with 8.3 days in nontested patients (unadjusted difference, 1.7 days; P < .0001). After propensity score matching with 3903 pairs, antibiotic duration remained greater in the procalcitonin group (9.6 days vs 9.2 days; P < .0001). In a subgroup analysis of 2241 tested patients with a procalcitonin value at the standard threshold for antibiotic discontinuation, antibiotic duration was shorter in tested vs nontested patients, with a mean difference of 0.1 days (P < .01).

Conclusions

In this retrospective propensity-matched cohort of patients with presumed LRTIs across a geographically diverse group of hospitals, patients who underwent procalcitonin testing did not have a meaningful reduction in antibiotic duration compared with those who were not tested. Poor implementation of procalcitonin testing may have undermined its effectiveness.