Compliance and Related Outcomes of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Traumatic Open Fractures

Bacterial Contamination of Open Fractures: Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistance Patterns in East China

Bacterial contamination of soft tissue in open fractures leads to high infection rates. Pathogens and their resistance against therapeutic agents change with time and vary in different regions. The purpose of this study was to characterize the bacterial spectrum present in open fractures and analyze the bacterial resistance to antibiotic agents based on five trauma centers in East China. A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted in six major trauma centers in East China from January 2015 to December 2017. Patients who sustained open fractures of the lower extremities were included. The data collected included the mechanism of injury, the Gustilo-Anderson classification, the isolated pathogens and their resistance against therapeutic agents, as well as the prophylactic antibiotics administered. In total, 1348 patients were included in our study, all of whom received antibiotic prophylaxis (cefotiam or cefuroxime) during the first debridement at the emergency room. Wound cultures were taken in 1187 patients (85.8%); the results showed that the positive rate of open fracture was 54.8% (651/1187), and 59% of the bacterial detections occurred in grade III fractures. Most pathogens (72.7%) were sensitive to prophylactic antibiotics, according to the EAST guideline. Quinolones and cotrimoxazole showed the lowest rates of resistance. The updated EAST guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in open fracture (2011) have been proven to be adequate for a large portion of patients, and we would like to suggest additional Gram-negative coverage for patients with grade II open fractures based on the results obtained in this setting in East China.

Type of antibiotic but not the duration of prophylaxis correlates with rates of fracture-related infection

PURPOSE

The issue of optimal prophylactic antibiotic administration for closed and open fracture surgeries remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to assess the role of type and duration longer than 48 h of antibiotic prophylaxis on the rates of fracture-related infection (FRI).

METHODS

This is a single-center, prospective observational cohort study carried out with patients undergoing surgery for implants insertion to fracture stability. Risk estimates were calculated on the variables associated with factors for FRI and reported as a prevalence ratio (PR) with respect to the 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Overall, 132 patients were analyzed. The global rate of FRI was 15.9% (21/132), with open and closed fractures accounting for 30.5% (11/36) and 10.4% (10/96), respectively. The FRI rates in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery for fracture stabilization who received prophylactic antibiotic for up to and longer than 48 h were 8.9% and 26.4%, respectively. This difference did not reach statistical significance (prevalence ratio [PR] = 2.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.9-7.3. p = 0.063).

CONCLUSIONS

Duration of antibiotic prophylaxis for surgical orthopedic fractures was not correlated with rates of FRI.

Surgical Infection Society Research Priorities: A Narrative Review of Fourteen Years of Progress

Background: In 2006, the Surgical Infection Society (SIS) utilized a modified Delphi approach to define 15 specific priority research questions that remained unanswered in the field of surgical infections. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the scientific progress achieved during the ensuing period in answering each of the 15 research questions and to determine if additional research in these fields is warranted. Methods: For each of the questions, a literature search using the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) was performed by the Scientific Studies Committee of the SIS to identify studies that attempted to address each of the defined questions. This literature was analyzed and summarized. The data on each question were evaluated by a surgical infections expert to determine if the question was answered definitively or remains unanswered. Results: All 15 priority research questions were studied in the last 14 years; six questions (40%) were definitively answered and 9 questions (60%) remain unanswered in whole or in part, mainly because of the low quality of the studies available on this topic. Several of the 9 unanswered questions were deemed to remain research priorities in 2020 and warrant further investigation. These included, for example, the role of empiric antimicrobial agents in nosocomial infections, the use of inotropes/vasopressors versus volume loading to raise the mean arterial pressure, and the role of increased antimicrobial dosing and frequency in the obese patient. Conclusions: Several surgical infection-related research questions prioritized in 2006 remain unanswered. Further high-quality research is required to provide a definitive answer to many of these priority knowledge gaps. An updated research agenda by the SIS is warranted at this time to define research priorities for the future.