Chronic Pain and Prescription Opioid Use Among Socially Marginalized Nigerian Women: Exploring Supply Channels and Pathways to Misuse

This study explores pathways to prescription opioid misuse and supply channels based on in-depth interviews with 16 socially marginalized Nigerian women suffering chronic pain. The pathways identified were medical pain treatment, prior substance use and opioid use for recreation and coping with psychological distress. Facing barriers to prescription opioids due to prescribing restrictions and provider stigma, many resorted to unlicensed chemist stores and street drug dealers for opioid analgesics, including fake and potentially harmful products. Patterns of prescription opioid misuse were woven into multiple and overlapping dynamics of marginalization shaping the lives of these women, including homelessness, sex work, substance use and intimate partner violence. Findings show a need to improve access to prescription opioids and other evidence-based approaches, framed within a trauma-informed approach to pain management. Further, integrating substance abuse treatment and pain management could make services responsive to the inter-related problems of chronic pain and prescription opioid misuse.

Problematic Opioid Use: A Scoping Literature Review of Profiles

Background and Objectives:

Problematic opioid use can be defined as opioid use behaviors leading to social, medical, or psychological consequences. In some instances, people presenting problematic opioid use can also meet criteria for an opioid use disorder. A growing body of literature highlights different types of people who use opioids, with contrasting characteristics and initiation patterns. In recent years, dynamic trends in opioid use have been documented and studies have demonstrated a shift in profiles.

Methods:

A scoping literature review was conducted to identify profiles of people presenting problematic opioid use, in order to support the development of tailored interventions and services.

Results:

Nine articles met the inclusion criteria. Five classifications emerge from the literature reviewed to distinguish types of people presenting problematic opioid use, according to: (1) the type of opioids used, (2) the route of opioid administration, (3) the level of quality of life, (4) patterns of other drugs used, and (5) dependence severity. While samples, concepts, and measurement tools vary between studies, the most salient finding might be the distinct profile of people presenting problematic use of pharmaceutical-type opioids.

Discussion and Conclusions:

This scoping review highlights that few studies address distinctive profiles of people presenting problematic opioid use. Geographical and chronological differences suggest that local timely assessments may be needed to tailor the service offer to specific needs.

Scientific Significance:

Future studies should focus on providing a deep understanding of distinct experiential perspectives and service needs, through exploratory quantitative and qualitative designs.

Designing Effective Warnings about Addiction on the Patient Information Leaflet of Over-the-Counter Codeine Sold in England to University Students

(1) Background: The harm of misusing over-the-counter (OTC) codeine-containing medicines among university students in England is being increasingly recognized. Based on English university students, this paper aims to study the importance of information design on information communication, explore methods for effective warning design, and investigate university students’ perception of OTC codeine. (2) Methods: The effective warning design is addressed through case studies, answering correctness by the heat map generated from the eye-tracking experiment (ETE), and the total time spent on the tasks. User perceptions are made though online surveys. (3) Results: Information design significantly affects the way user processes information. Therefore, two emphasized warnings displayed in the headline, and the “possible side effect (PSE)” sections and warning signs of addiction presented under the PSE are suggested as effective ways to display warnings. For students’ perception of OTC codeine, 80% of university students are unfamiliar with the substance. After reading the patient information leaflets (PILs), 47% recommended tight regulation on codeine. (4) Conclusions: The misuse of OTC codeine could be a potential problem among English university students. The design of the PIL significantly influences the chance of unintentional medicine misuse. The display of warnings on the PILs of OTC codeine should be redesigned for better understanding.

Known fentanyl use among clients of harm reduction sites in British Columbia, Canada

BACKGROUND

North America is in the midst of an opioid overdose epidemic and it is commonly suggested that exposure to fentanyl is unknown. Using a provincial survey of harm reduction site clients, we aimed to characterize known and unknown fentanyl use and their correlates among people who use drugs in British Columbia, Canada.

METHODS

We recruited 486 clients who were >18 years old and 316 agreed to provide a urine sample for substance use testing. Reported known fentanyl use was defined as a three-level categorical variable assessing recent (i.e., in the previous three days) fentanyl exposure: (i) known exposure; (ii) unknown exposure; and (iii) no exposure. We also assessed any exposure to fentanyl (Yes vs. No) confirmed by urinalysis. Survey data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Multinomial logistic regression and modified Poisson regression models were built to examine different correlates of exposure to fentanyl.

RESULTS

Median age of the participants was 40 (IQR: 32-49). Out of the 303 eligible participants, 38.7% (117) reported known fentanyl use, 21.7% (66) had unknown fentanyl use, and 39.6% (120) had no recent fentanyl use. In the adjusted multinomial logistic regression model and in comparison with unknown fentanyl use, recent known fentanyl use was significantly associated with self-report of methadone use (aRRR = 3.18), heroin/morphine use (aRRR = 4.40), and crystal meth use (aRRR = 2.95). Moreover, any recent exposure to fentanyl (i.e., positive urine test for fentanyl) was significantly associated with living in urban settings (aPR = 1.49), and self-reporting recent cannabis use (aPR = 0.73), crystal meth (aPR = 1.45), and heroin/morphine use (aPR = 2.48).

CONCLUSION

The landscape of illicit opioid use is changing in BC and more people are using fentanyl knowingly. The increasing prevalence of known fentanyl use is concerning and calls for further investments in public awareness and public policy efforts regarding fentanyl exposure and risks.

Examining opioid-involved overdose mortality trends prior to fentanyl: New York City, 2000-2015

BACKGROUND

Rates of overdose death in New York City (NYC) increased 26% from 2000 to 2015, with a notable decrease in rate from 2006 to 2010. Beginning in 2016, the synthetic opioid fentanyl entered the NYC illicit drug market and has been associated with large increases in overdose death. This study assessed NYC trends in opioid-involved overdose death prior to fentanyl to understand the contribution of specific opioids and inform overdose prevention strategies.

METHODS

Data were derived from death certificates linked to postmortem toxicology testing. We stratified cases into three mutually exclusive groups: (1) heroin without opioid analgesics (OAs); (2) OAs without heroin; and (3) the combination of heroin and OAs. We calculated mortality rates by year, and compared rates by the demographic characteristics age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Joinpoint regression identified junctures in trends between 2000 and 2015.

RESULTS

Rates of overdose death involving heroin without OAs decreased from 2006 to 2010, then increased from 2010 to 2015 among males, persons age 15 to 54, and Blacks and Whites. Rates of overdose death involving OAs with and without heroin increased from 2000 to 2015 across all demographic subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The identified trends in overdose death are suggestive of demographic shifts in drug use. In particular, the tamper-resistant reformulation of oxycodone 80 mg may have increased the use of heroin among primary OA users. Notably, older adults may have had established heroin use practices prior to the proliferation of OAs and thus may have been less likely to modify drug use practices.

Opioid misuse initiation: Implications for intervention

The nonmedical use of opioids (e.g., prescription painkillers and heroin) has drastically increased over the past two decades. Despite the popular media narrative suggesting initiation often begins with misused personal prescriptions, there has been surprisingly little investigation into how persons initiate their misuse of opioids. Inattention to initiation patterns is an important limitation because understandings of onset directly inform prevention and treatment interventions. The primary goals of this study, therefore, were to: (1) describe the age patterns of opioid misuse initiation, (2) identify the opioid most commonly used at initiation and the source of the initial opioids, and (3) explore the narrative accounts of the circumstances surrounding opioid misuse onset. Surveys (n = 125) and in-depth interviews (n = 30) were conducted with nonmedical opioid users currently residing in southwest Pennsylvania between July 2017 and July 2018. Survey results show that initiation of opioid misuse (both heroin and prescription opioids) tends to occur prior to age 25, peaking between the ages of 18-25, with most (81%) initiating with prescription opioids. Qualitative findings provided additional context regarding the timing of initiation, acquiring opioids at initiation, and motivations for initiating. This study adds to the limited research on opioid misuse initiation and provides insights to drug treatment providers, prescribers, and public health professionals in identifying who is at risk for opioid misuse initiation, and more importantly, when and how to intervene most effectively.

Patterns and history of prescription drug use among opioid-related drug overdose cases in British Columbia, Canada, 2015-2016

BACKGROUND

British Columbia is the epicenter of the current fentanyl-related overdose crisis in Canada. Our study characterizes prescribing histories of people who had an opioid-related overdose compared to matched controls.

METHODS

We examined linked administrative data for individuals who overdosed between January 1, 2015 and November 30, 2016. Past prescriptions over five years were assessed for opioids for pain, opioid agonist therapy, benzodiazepines/z-drugs, antidepressants, antipsychotics, gabapentinoids, mood stabilizers and anti-epileptics, muscle relaxants, and other sedating medications. Prescribing history of 9964 cases was compared with that of 49,820 matched controls.

RESULTS

Overdose cases were more likely to be prescribed opioids for pain and to have used prescription opioids on a long-term basis in the previous five years compared to controls. However, at the time of overdose, 92% of men and 86% of women did not have an active opioid for pain prescription, and approximately half had not filled one in the past five years. Those who overdosed tended to have more prescriptions for psychotropic substances than controls. Fewer than 10% of cases had an active prescription for opioid agonist therapy and most were not on treatment in the past.

CONCLUSIONS

Low prevalence of active prescriptions for opioids for pain at the time of overdose suggests that opioid prescribing plays a limited short-term impact in the current fentanyl-related crisis of overdoses. While liberal opioid prescribing practices may have contributed to the development of the current overdose crisis, regulation and enforcement of clinicians' prescribing practices will likely have limited impact in reducing overdoses.

Increased use of heroin as an initiating opioid of abuse: Further considerations and policy implications

INTRODUCTION

Previously, we reported a marked increase in the use of heroin as an initiating opioid in non-tolerant, first time opioid users. In the current paper, we sought to update and expand upon these results, with a discussion of the policy implications on the overall opioid epidemic.

METHODS

Opioid initiation data from the original study were updated to include surveys completed through 2017 (N = 8382) from a national sample of treatment-seeking opioid users. In addition, past month abuse of heroin and prescription were analyzed as raw numbers of treatment program entrant in the last five years (2013-2017), drawing from only those treatment centers that participated every year in that time frame.

RESULTS

The updated data confirm and extend the results of our original study: the use of heroin as an initiating opioid increased from 8.7% in 2005 to 31.6% in 2015, with increases in overall Ns per initiation year reflecting a narrowing of the "treatment gap", the time lag between opioid initiation from 2005 to 2015 and later treatment admission (up to 2017). Slight decreases were observed in treatment admissions, but this decline was totally confined to prescription opioid use, with heroin use continuing to increase in absolute numbers.

CONCLUSIONS

Given that opioid novices have limited tolerance, the risk of fatal overdose for heroin initiates is elevated compared to prescription opioids, particularly given non-oral administration and often unknown purity/adulterants (i.e., fentanyl). Imprecision of titrating dose among opioid novices may explain observed increases opioid overdoses. Future policy decisions should note that prescription opioid-specific interventions may have little impact on a growing heroin epidemic.

Understanding multi-pill ingestion of prescription opioids: Prevalence, characteristics, and motivation

PURPOSE

Oral use is the primary route of administration among non-medical prescription opioid users. While progression to non-oral routes and shifts to stronger opioids have been previously studied as ways to cope with tolerance, the prevalence and patterns of those who cope by increasing the number of pills/tablets ingested at one time (ie, multi-pill use) has not been assessed.

METHODS

A subset (N = 231) of treatment-seeking opioid users from a national opioid surveillance system, participating in the Researchers and Participants Interacting Directly (RAPID) Program, completed an online survey centered on multi-pill use.

RESULTS

Over two-thirds of non-medical prescription opioid users had a history of multi-pill use (67.7%), defined as ingesting four or more of the same pill, intact and at the same time. Among these (n = 154), the median maximum number of pills taken at one time was eight, with over 20% ingesting 11 or more pills in a single instance. Nearly half engaged in multi-pill ingestion more than once a day in the past month (43.8%), with accessibility to lower dose pills being the primary motivator (85.4%). Hydrocodone immediate-release (IR) compounds were by far the most frequently endorsed (90.3%), followed by oxycodone IR tablets with acetaminophen (76.0%) and oxycodone IR tablets containing no acetaminophen/ibuprofen (56.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that the ingestion of multiple opioid pills/tablets is extremely common among treatment-seeking opioid users. This, and other forms of non-medical oral use of prescription opioids, should be taken under consideration when developing prevention and intervention efforts targeting the opioid epidemic.

The prescription opioid epidemic: a review of qualitative studies on the progression from initial use to abuse

Most research designed to answer the “why” of the prescription opioid epidemic has relied on structured interviews, which rigidly attempt to capture the complex reasons people use opioids. In contrast this systematic literature review focuses on peer-reviewed studies that have used a qualitative approach to examine the development of an opioid-use disorder from the point of initial exposure. Rather than simply providing a “high,” opioids reportedly relieve psychological/emotional problems or provide an escape from life stressors. As use continues, avoidance of withdrawal sickness becomes an overriding concern, with all other benefits playing minor roles in persistent use. These studies indicate that terms used in structured interviews, such as “nontherapeutic use” or variations thereof, poorly capture the complex range of needs opioids satisfy. Both quantitative/structured studies and more qualitative ones, as well as more focused studies, have an important role in better informing prevention and treatment efforts.

The source and diversion of pharmaceutical drugs for non-medical use: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The non-medical use (NMU) of pharmaceutical drugs is an increasing public health concern. This systematic review consolidates current knowledge about how pharmaceutical drugs are obtained for NMU and the processes and people involved in diversion.

METHODS

Peer-reviewed and grey literature databases were searched for empirical studies published between 1996 and 2017 that examined the source or diversion of pharmaceutical opioids, sedatives or stimulants for NMU in countries with reported misuse problems. Pooled prevalence meta-analyses using random effects models were used to estimate the prevalence of medical and non-medical sourcing reported by end-users, and gifting, selling and trading by various populations.

RESULTS

This review synthesizes the findings of 54 cross-sectional studies via meta-analyses, with a remaining 95 studies examined through narrative review. Pharmaceutical drugs are primarily sourced for NMU from friends and family (57%, 95% CI 53%-62%, I² = 98.5, n = 30) and despite perceptions of healthcare professionals to the contrary, illegitimate practices such as doctor shopping are uncommon (7%, 95% CI 6%-10%, I² = 97.4, n = 29). Those at risk of diversion include patients displaying aberrant medication behaviors, people with substance use issues and students in fraternity/sorority environments. Sourcing via dealers is also common (32%, 95% CI 23%-41%, I² = 99.8, n = 25) and particularly so among people who use illicit drugs (47%, 95% CI 35%-60%, I² = 99.1, n = 15). There is little to no organized criminal involvement in the pharmaceutical black market.

CONCLUSION

Pharmaceutical drugs for NMU are primarily sourced by end-users through social networks. Future research should examine how dealers source pharmaceutical drugs.