Ironies in the Pursuit of Well-Being: The Perspectives of Low-Income, Substance-Using Women on Service Institutions

Interest in improving low-income, drug-using women's access to and utilization of care services tends to focus on remedies to personal, structural and gendered barriers to care. In contrast, this exploratory, qualitative study of women's perspectives illustrates how institutional rules, both within and across agencies, and informal provider practices can constrain women's use of health and social services. This paper draws attention to the ways in which low-income, drug-using women respond to obstacles and interpersonal tensions they experience in service settings. As a means of pursuing their material and social well-being, the women employ forms of resistance that are both protective and potentially harmful. This paper underscores the need to recognize how service institutions are implicated in drug users' everyday struggles for well-being.

Single room occupancy (SRO) hotels as mental health risk environments among impoverished women: the intersection of policy, drug use, trauma, and urban space

BACKGROUND

Due to the significantly high levels of comorbid substance use and mental health diagnosis among urban poor populations, examining the intersection of drug policy and place requires a consideration of the role of housing in drug user mental health. In San Francisco, geographic boundedness and progressive health and housing polices have coalesced to make single room occupancy hotels (SROs) a key urban built environment used to house poor populations with co-occurring drug use and mental health issues. Unstably housed women who use illicit drugs have high rates of lifetime and current trauma, which manifests in disproportionately high rates of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression when compared to stably housed women.

METHODS

We report data from a qualitative interview study (n=30) and four years of ethnography conducted with housing policy makers and unstably housed women who use drugs and live in SROs.

RESULTS

Women in the study lived in a range of SRO built environments, from publicly funded, newly built SROs to privately owned, dilapidated buildings, which presented a rich opportunity for ethnographic comparison. Applying Rhodes et al.'s framework of socio-structural vulnerability, we explore how SROs can operate as "mental health risk environments" in which macro-structural factors (housing policies shaping the built environment) interact with meso-level factors (social relations within SROs) and micro-level, behavioral coping strategies to impact women's mental health. The degree to which SRO built environments were "trauma-sensitive" at the macro level significantly influenced women's mental health at meso- and micro-levels. Women who were living in SROs which exacerbated fear and anxiety attempted, with limited success, to deploy strategies on the meso- and micro-level to manage their mental health symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Study findings underscore the importance of housing polices which consider substance use in the context of current and cumulative trauma experiences in order to improve quality of life and mental health for unstably housed women.

Access to drug abuse treatment under Treatment on Demand policy in San Francisco

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated whether implementation of Treatment on Demand (TOD) policy in San Francisco was associated with improved access to drug abuse treatment.

METHODS

Data came from San Francisco's treatment program waiting list over 4 years spanning the implementation of TOD policy. Access measures were monthly applicants waiting and days waited by treatment admissions. Quantitative analyses with 69 treatment facilities contrasted those receiving vs. not receiving TOD funds. Qualitative data came from interviews with facility administrators.

RESULTS

There was a small statistically significant decline in monthly waiting lists in the number of people waiting for treatment during the study period. The days waited by those admitted to treatment, however, significantly increased in TOD-funded facilities. Facilities used varied criteria for completing the access measures, which limit the utility of the measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Access to treatment improved slightly with implementation of TOD policy.

Medicaid coverage and access to publicly funded opiate treatment

This observational study examines changes in access to methadone maintenance treatment following Oregon's decision to remove substance abuse treatment from the Medicaid benefit for an expansion population. Access was compared before and after the benefit change for two cohorts of adults addicted to opiates presenting for publicly funded treatment. Propensity score analysis helped model some selective disenrollment from Medicaid that occurred after the benefit change. Logistic regression was used to compare access to methadone by cohort controlling for client characteristics. Opiate users presenting for publicly funded treatment after the change were less than half as likely (OR = 0.40) to be placed in an opiate treatment program compared to the prior year. Further analysis revealed that those with no recent treatment history were less likely to present for treatment after the benefit change. These results have implications for states considering Medicaid cuts, especially if the anticipated increases in illegal activity, emergency room utilization, unemployment, and mortality can be demonstrated.

Counseling as an intervention for the cocaine-abusing methadone maintenance patient

Using archival data from Bay Area Addiction Research and Treatment (BAART), a methadone treatment provider, this study examined the efficacy of the clinical intervention of counseling on cocaine use by BAART patients. California State Assembly Bill 2071 mandated that patients at methadone clinics be required to undergo a minimum of 50 minutes of counseling per month. Records of 179 patients continuously active in treatment beginning 12 months prior to (i.e., the baseline) and two years after AB 2071's implementation were reviewed. These patients were also identified as cocaine abusers. A pretest-intervention-posttest design was employed, with the increased counseling mandated by AB 2071 as the intervention. Cocaine abusers' urinalysis results during the one-year baseline were compared to the time period following AB 2071's implementation. The independent variable was the amount of counseling received and the dependent variable was cocaine use. The prediction was that cocaine-abusing methadone maintenance patients would have fewer cocaine positive urine analyses following AB 2071's implementation than in the 12-month baseline period preceding AB 2071. Results supported the main hypothesis that cocaine-abusing patients would show better improvement following AB 2071. Additionally, the actual amount of time in counseling was shown to lead to greater improvement in treatment for cocaine abusers. An important secondary finding was that heroin use was also negatively correlated to time in counseling. There were no gender differences in the response to the counseling treatment.