Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Intramuscular Ziprasidone in Healthy Volunteers

Development of a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model to simulate the pharmacokinetics of intramuscular antiretroviral drugs

There is growing interest in the use of long-acting (LA) injectable drugs to improve treatment adherence. However, their long elimination half-life complicates the conduct of clinical trials. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling is a mathematical tool that allows to simulate unknown clinical scenarios for LA formulations. Thus, this work aimed to develop and verify a mechanistic intramuscular PBPK model. The framework describing the release of a LA drug from the depot was developed by including both the physiology of the injection site and the physicochemical properties of the drug. The framework was coded in Matlab® 2020a and implemented in our existing PBPK model for the verification step using clinical data for LA cabotegravir, rilpivirine, and paliperidone. The model was considered verified when the simulations were within twofold of observed data. Furthermore, a local sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the impact of various factors relevant for the drug release from the depot on pharmacokinetics. The PBPK model was successfully verified since all predictions were within twofold of observed clinical data. Peak concentration, area under the concentration-time curve, and trough concentration were sensitive to media viscosity, drug solubility, drug density, and diffusion layer thickness. Additionally, inflammation was shown to impact the drug release from the depot. The developed framework correctly described the release and the drug disposition of LA formulations upon intramuscular administration. It can be implemented in PBPK models to address pharmacological questions related to the use of LA formulations.

Risk Stratification of QTc Prolongation in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Antipsychotics for the Management of Delirium Symptoms

BACKGROUND

Patients experiencing significant agitation or perceptual disturbances related to delirium in an intensive care setting may benefit from short-term treatment with an antipsychotic medication. Some antipsychotic medications may prolong the QTc interval, which increases the risk of potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmias. In this targeted review, we describe the evidence regarding the relationships between antipsychotic medications and QTc prolongation and practical methods for monitoring the QTc interval and mitigating arrhythmia risk.

METHODS

Searches of PubMed and Cochrane Library were performed to identify studies, published before February 2023, investigating the relationships between antipsychotic medications and QTc prolongation or arrhythmias.

RESULTS

Most antipsychotic medications commonly used for the management of delirium symptoms (eg, intravenous haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine) cause a moderate degree of QTc prolongation. Among other antipsychotics, those most likely to cause QTc prolongation are iloperidone and ziprasidone, while aripiprazole and lurasidone appear to have minimal risk for QTc prolongation. Genetic vulnerabilities, female sex, older age, pre-existing cardiovascular disease, electrolyte abnormalities, and non-psychiatric medications also increase the risk of QTc prolongation. For individuals at risk of QTc prolongation, it is essential to measure the QTc interval accurately and consistently and consider medication adjustments if needed.

CONCLUSIONS

Antipsychotic medications are one of many risk factors for QTc prolongation. When managing agitation related to delirium, it is imperative to assess an individual patient's risk for QTc prolongation and to choose a medication and monitoring strategy commensurate to the risks. In intensive care settings, we recommend regular ECG monitoring, using a linear regression formula to correct for heart rate. If substantial QTc prolongation (eg, QTc > 500 msec) is present, a change in pharmacologic treatment can be considered, though a particular medication may still be warranted if the risks of discontinuation (eg, extreme agitation, removal of invasive monitoring devices) outweigh the risks of arrhythmias.

AIMS

This review aims to summarize the current literature on relationships between antipsychotic medications and QTc prolongation and to make practical clinical recommendations towards the approach of antipsychotic medication use for the management of delirium-related agitation and perceptual disturbances in intensive care settings.

Challenges and Opportunities for In Vitro-In Vivo Extrapolation of Aldehyde Oxidase-Mediated Clearance: Toward a Roadmap for Quantitative Translation

Underestimation of aldehyde oxidase (AO)-mediated clearance by current in vitro assays leads to uncertainty in human dose projections, thereby reducing the likelihood of success in drug development. In the present study we first evaluated the current drug development practices for AO substrates. Next, the overall predictive performance of in vitro-in vivo extrapolation of unbound hepatic intrinsic clearance (CLint,u) and unbound hepatic intrinsic clearance by AO (CLint,u,AO) was assessed using a comprehensive literature database of in vitro (human cytosol/S9/hepatocytes) and in vivo (intravenous/oral) data collated for 22 AO substrates (total of 100 datapoints from multiple studies). Correction for unbound fraction in the incubation was done by experimental data or in silico predictions. The fraction metabolized by AO (fmAO) determined via in vitro/in vivo approaches was found to be highly variable. The geometric mean fold errors (gmfe) for scaled CLint,u (mL/min/kg) were 10.4 for human hepatocytes, 5.6 for human liver cytosols, and 5.0 for human liver S9, respectively. Application of these gmfe's as empirical scaling factors improved predictions (45%-57% within twofold of observed) compared with no correction (11%-27% within twofold), with the scaling factors qualified by leave-one-out cross-validation. A road map for quantitative translation was then proposed following a critical evaluation on the in vitro and clinical methodology to estimate in vivo fmAO In conclusion, the study provides the most robust system-specific empirical scaling factors to date as a pragmatic approach for the prediction of in vivo CLint,u,AO in the early stages of drug development. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Confidence remains low when predicting in vivo clearance of AO substrates using in vitro systems, leading to de-prioritization of AO substrates from the drug development pipeline to mitigate risk of unexpected and costly in vivo impact. The current study establishes a set of empirical scaling factors as a pragmatic tool to improve predictability of in vivo AO clearance. Developing clinical pharmacology strategies for AO substrates by utilizing mass balance/clinical drug-drug interaction data will help build confidence in fmAO.

Use of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling for Predicting Drug-Food Interactions: Recommendations for Improving Predictive Performance of Low Confidence Food Effect Models

Food can alter drug absorption and impact safety and efficacy. Besides conducting clinical studies, in vitro approaches such as biorelevant solubility and dissolution testing and in vivo dog studies are typical approaches to estimate a drug's food effect. The use of physiologically based pharmacokinetic models has gained importance and is nowadays a standard tool for food effect predictions at preclinical and clinical stages in the pharmaceutical industry. This manuscript is part of a broader publication from the IQ Consortium's food effect physiologically based pharmacokinetic model (PBPK) modeling working group and complements previous publications by focusing on cases where the food effect was predicted with low confidence. Pazopanib-HCl, trospium-Cl, and ziprasidone-HCl served as model compounds to provide insights into why several food effect predictions failed in the first instance. Furthermore, the manuscript depicts approaches whereby PBPK-based food effect predictions may be improved. These improvements should focus on the PBPK model functionality, especially better reflecting fasted- and fed-state gastric solubility, gastric re-acidification, and complex mechanisms related to gastric emptying of drugs. For improvement of in vitro methodologies, the focus should be on the development of more predictive solubility, supersaturation, and precipitation assays. With regards to the general PBPK modeling methodology, modelers should account for the full solubility profile when modeling ionizable compounds, including common ion effects, and apply a straightforward strategy to account for drug precipitation.

Parenteral Sustained Release Lipid Phase-Transition System of Ziprasidone: Fabrication and Evaluation for Schizophrenia Therapy

Introduction

Ziprasidone (ZP) is a novel atypical antipsychotic agent effective in the treatment of positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia with low chances for extrapyramidal side effects (EPs) and cognitive deficits. ZP possesses poor oral bioavailability (~50%), short biological half-life (~2.5 h) and due to extensive first-pass metabolism, a repeated dose is administered which makes the therapy non-adherent, leading to patient non-compliance. Therefore, this is a first report of developing parenteral ZP loaded sustained release phospholipid based phase-transition system (ZP-LPS).

Methods

The ZP-LPS system was formulated by mixing of biocompatible materials including phospholipid E 80, medium chain triglyceride (MCT) and ethanol. Optimization was done by aqueous titration method using pseudo-ternary phase diagram and dynamic rheological measurements. In vivo depot formation was confirmed by gamma scintigraphy after subcutaneous injection. Biodegradation and biocompatibility studies were performed for its safety evaluation. Finally, the efficacy of the formulation was assessed by Morris water maze (MWM) test and dizocilpine (MK-801) was used to induce schizophrenia in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Results

Optimized ZP-LPS showed rapid gelation (2 min), highest change in viscosity (~48000 mPa.s) and sustained release of ZP over a period of 1 month. Gamma scintigraphy depicted that the low-viscosity ZP-LPS system undergo rapid in situ gelation. Biodegradation and biocompatibility studies revealed gradual degradation in size of depot over a period of 28 days without any inflammation at the injection site. In MWM test, escape latency, time spent and total distance in target quadrant were significantly improved (p < 0.001) in the ZP-LPS group in comparison to the MK-801 group when evaluated at day 0, day 7 and day 28. However, significant improvement (p < 0.001) was observed only at day 0 in ZP suspension group.

Conclusion

The overall result indicates that the novel ZP-LPS system is safe, biodegradable, and effective for the management of schizophrenia.

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetics of ziprasidone in pregnant women

AIMS

Pregnancy is associated with physiological changes that alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of drugs. The aim of this study was to predict the PK of ziprasidone in pregnant women.

METHODS

A full physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of ziprasidone was developed and validated for the non-pregnant population (healthy adults, paediatrics, geriatrics), and this was extended to the pregnant state to assess the change in PK profile of ziprasidone throughout pregnancy.

RESULTS

The PBPK model successfully predicted the ziprasidone disposition in healthy adult volunteers, wherein the predicted and observed AUC, C_max and t_max were within the fold-difference of 0.94-1.09, 0.89-1.40 and 0.80-1.08, respectively. The paediatric and geriatric population, also showed predicted AUC, C_max and t_max within a two-fold range of the observed values. The simulated exposure in pregnant women using a p-PBPK model showed no significant difference when compared to non-pregnant women.

CONCLUSIONS

The PBPK model predicted the impact of physiological changes during pregnancy on PK and exposure of ziprasidone, suggesting that dose adjustment is not necessary in this special population.

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics, safety and clinical efficacy of ziprasidone for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder

INTRODUCTION

Multiple strategies exist for the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia and related disorders. In the last 20 years, several 'new' compounds have been introduced, called 'atypical antipsychotics', which have higher efficacy and better tolerability than first-generation neuroleptics. Among them, ziprasidone (ZPR) is currently finding widespread use, and it has also been shown to be active as an augmenter in bipolar disorder therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to provide the latest information on ZPR, an 'atypical' agent for the pharmacological therapy of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. A literature search has been carried out with the keywords 'ziprasidone', 'schizophrenia', 'psychosis', 'bipolar', 'pharmacokinetics' and 'clinical trials'. In this process, particular attention has been paid to the drug pharmacokinetic characteristics and its safety in clinical use.

EXPERT OPINION

ZPR shares most advantages and disadvantages with other atypical antipsychotics. However, it can be useful for its low tendency to cause metabolic syndrome and hyperprolactinaemia, especially in patients suffering from excess weight, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes or who have suffered from hyperprolactinaemia when using other antipsychotics. However, there are serious doubts as to whether ZPR should be administered to patients suffering from arrhythmias or QTc prolongation, and even more for administration to bipolar patients undergoing polypharmacy with antidepressants.

QT Interval Prolongation Associated with Intramuscular Ziprasidone in Chinese Patients: A Case Report and a Comprehensive Literature Review with Meta-Analysis

Intramuscular (IM) ziprasidone has been associated with QTc interval prolongations in patients with preexisting risk factors. A 23-year-old male Chinese schizophrenia patient experienced an increase of QTc interval of 83 milliseconds (ms) after receiving 20 mg IM ziprasidone (baseline and increased QT/QTc were, respectively, 384/418 and 450/501). This was rated as a probable adverse drug reaction (ADR) by the Liverpool ADR causality assessment tool. A systematic review including all types of trials reporting the effect of IM ziprasidone on the QTc interval prolongation identified 19 trials with a total of 1428 patients. Mean QTc change from baseline to end of each study was −3.7 to 12.8 ms after IM ziprasidone. Four randomized trials (3 of 4 published in Chinese) were used to calculate a meta-analysis of QTc interval prolongation which showed no significant differences between IM ziprasidone and IM haloperidol groups (risk ratio 0.49 to 4.31, 95% confidence interval 0.09 to 19.68, P = 0.06 to 0.41). However, our review included two cases of patients who experienced symptoms probably related to QTc prolongation after IM ziprasidone. Thus, careful screening and close monitoring, including baseline ECG, should be considered in patients receiving IM ziprasidone for the first time.

Ziprasidone: efficacy and safety in patients with bipolar disorder

Atypical antipsychotics have been increasingly shown to have efficacy in the treatment of various phases of bipolar disorder. Ziprasidone acts primarily through serotonergic and dopaminergic receptor antagonism, and exerts effects as an inhibitor of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake. Ziprasidone exhibits dose proportional, linear changes in exposure and is hepatically metabolized primarily by aldehyde oxidase. In studies of patients with acute manic or mixed episodes, treatment with ziprasidone monotherapy or in combination with lithium, resulted in rapid symptom improvement and was generally well tolerated. Results from open-label extension studies of ziprasidone indicate continued improvement in manic symptoms. Preliminary data in pediatric patients with bipolar disorder also suggest it may be efficacious in this population. Ziprasidone is considered as a first-line treatment option in patients with bipolar manic or mixed episodes, with or without psychosis and displays a favorable side-effect profile.

Manejo de paciente agitado ou agressivo

OBJETIVO: Revisar as medidas preconizadas para o manejo de pacientes agitados ou agressivos. MÉTODO: Por meio de uma busca em bancos de dados (PubMed e Web of Science) foram identificados artigos empíricos e revisões sobre intervenções farmacológicas e não farmacológicas para o manejo de agitação e/ou violência. RESULTADOS: O manejo não farmacológico de agitação/agressão engloba a organização do espaço físico e a adequação de atitudes e comportamentos dos profissionais de saúde. O objetivo principal do manejo farmacológico é a tranquilização rápida, buscando a redução dos sintomas de agitação e agressividade, sem a indução de sedação profunda ou prolongada, mantendo-se o paciente tranquilo, mas completa ou parcialmente responsivo. A polifarmácia deve ser evitada e as doses das medicações devem ser o menor possível, ajustadas de acordo com a necessidade clínica. A administração intramuscular de medicação deve ser considerada como última alternativa e as opções de uso de antipsicóticos e benzodiazepínicos são descritas e comentadas. O manejo físico, por meio de contenção mecânica, pode ser necessário nas situações de violência em que exista risco para o paciente ou equipe, e deve obedecer a critérios rigorosos. CONCLUSÃO: Os procedimentos devem ser cuidadosamente executados, evitando complicações de ordem física e emocional para pacientes e equipe.

A meta-analysis of the risk of acute extrapyramidal symptoms with intramuscular antipsychotics for the treatment of agitation

OBJECTIVE

We examined the evidence for a decreased risk of extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) with intramuscular second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) versus intramuscular haloperidol alone or in combination with an anticholinergic agent.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE (1950 to the present), and EMBASE and the Cochrane Database through January 16, 2008, for studies published in English of intramuscular SGAs and intramuscular haloperidol alone or in combination with an anticholinergic agent using the following drug names: ziprasidone, Geodon, olanzapine, Zyprexa, aripiprazole, Abilify, haloperidol, and Haldol. We then searched this pool of studies for trials with the terms intramuscular, IM, or injectable. Initially, we included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs). To obtain more data comparing SGAs to the combination of haloperidol and an anticholinergic, we conducted a second analysis including studies of any methodology.

STUDY SELECTION

Seven RCTs that compared intramuscular SGAs to intramuscular haloperidol alone were identified. However, we found only one RCT of haloperidol plus an anticholinergic. In the second analysis, we identified 18 studies, including 4 using haloperidol combined with promethazine (an antihistamine with anticholinergic properties).

DATA EXTRACTION

The primary outcome measure was acute dystonia; secondary outcome measures included akathisia, parkinsonism, or the need for additional anticholinergic medication. For RCTs, risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each outcome. When all studies were included in the second analysis, we calculated the risk of acute dystonia.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Among RCTs (N = 2032), SGAs were associated with a significantly lower risk of acute dystonia (RR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.39), akathisia (RR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.44), and anticholinergic use (RR = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.09 to 0.43) compared with haloperidol alone. When all trials were considered (N = 3425), rates of acute dystonia were higher for haloperidol alone (4.7%) than for SGAs (0.6%) or for haloperidol plus promethazine (0.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Intramuscular SGAs have a significantly lower risk of acute EPS compared to haloperidol alone. However, intramuscular haloperidol plus promethazine has a risk of acute dystonia comparable to intramuscular SGAs. The decision to use SGAs should consider other factors in addition to the reduction of EPS, which can be prevented by the use of an anticholinergic agent.

Ziprasidone: a review of its use in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder

Ziprasidone (Geodon, Zeldox) is an atypical antipsychotic agent with a unique neurotransmitter receptor-binding profile. The oral formulation is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with schizophrenia and the intramuscular formulation for the control of acute agitation in these patients. In adult patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, oral ziprasidone was effective at a dosage of 40-80 mg twice daily in patients experiencing a phase of acute illness, and at a dosage of 20-80 mg twice daily in those with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, including those who were symptomatically stable. Ziprasidone offers the advantage over most other atypical antipsychotic agents of being available in a fast-acting intramuscular formulation for control of acute agitation, thus providing clinicians with the option to safely and effectively transition to longer-term treatment with the oral formulation. Although careful consideration should be given to the propensity for ziprasidone to cause corrected QT (QTc) interval prolongation, albeit at a relatively low incidence, the drug generally has a favourable tolerability profile of low extrapyramidal syndrome (EPS) liability, neutral bodyweight gain, and potentially low propensity for metabolic complications. Thus, ziprasidone is an effective option for the management of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, with the intramuscular formulation providing a useful option for the treatment of acute agitation in these patients.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Atypical Antipsychotics

In the past, the information about the dose-clinical effectiveness of typical antipsychotics was not complete and this led to the risk of extrapyramidal adverse effects. This, together with the intention of improving patients' quality of life and therapeutic compliance, resulted in the development of atypical or second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). This review will concentrate on the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, amisulpride, ziprasidone, aripiprazole and sertindole, and will discuss the main aspects of their pharmacodynamics. In psychopharmacology, therapeutic drug monitoring studies have generally concentrated on controlling compliance and avoiding adverse effects by keeping long-term exposure to the minimal effective blood concentration. The rationale for using therapeutic drug monitoring in relation to SGAs is still a matter of debate, but there is growing evidence that it can improve efficacy, especially when patients do not respond to therapeutic doses or when they develop adverse effects. Here, we review the literature concerning the relationships between plasma concentrations of SGAs and clinical responses by dividing the studies on the basis of the length of their observation periods. Studies with clozapine evidenced a positive relationship between plasma concentrations and clinical response, with a threshold of 350-420 ng/mL associated with good clinical response. The usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring is well established because high plasma concentrations of clozapine can increase the risk of epileptic seizures. Plasma clozapine concentrations seem to be influenced by many factors such as altered cytochrome P450 1A4 activity, age, sex and smoking. The pharmacological effects of risperidone depend on the sum of the plasma concentrations of risperidone and its 9-hydroxyrisperidone metabolite, so monitoring the plasma concentrations of the parent compound alone can lead to erroneous interpretations. Despite a large variability in plasma drug concentrations, the lack of studies using fixed dosages, and discrepancies in the results, it seems that monitoring the plasma concentrations of the active moiety may be useful. However, no therapeutic plasma concentration range for risperidone has yet been clearly established. A plasma threshold concentration for parkinsonian side effects has been found to be 74 ng/mL. Moreover, therapeutic drug monitoring may be particularly useful in the switch between the oral and the long-acting injectable form. The reviewed studies on olanzapine strongly indicate a relationship between clinical outcomes and plasma concentrations. Olanzapine therapeutic drug monitoring can be considered very useful in assessing therapeutic efficacy and controlling adverse events. A therapeutic range of 20-50 ng/mL has been found. There is little evidence in favour of the existence of a relationship between plasma quetiapine concentrations and clinical responses, and an optimal therapeutic range has not been identified. Positron emission tomography studies of receptor blockade indicated a discrepancy between the time course of receptor occupancy and plasma quetiapine concentrations. The value of quetiapine plasma concentration monitoring in clinical practice is still controversial. Preliminary data suggested that a therapeutic plasma amisulpride concentration of 367 ng/mL was associated with clinical improvement. A therapeutic range of 100-400 ng/mL is proposed from non-systematic clinical experience. There is no direct evidence concerning optimal plasma concentration ranges of ziprasidone, aripiprazole or sertindole.

Intramuscular ziprasidone treatment of acute psychotic agitation in elderly patients with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

Intramuscular (i.m.) ziprasidone treatment has been shown to be effective and well tolerated in reducing the symptoms of acute psychosis in adults. Few data are available as to safety in the elderly. The growing utilization of health services by elderly psychiatric patients warrants an evaluation in this population.

METHOD

Consecutive elderly patients (60 years of and older) admitted to a psychogeriatric ward in a large, university-affiliated tertiary psychiatric center were treated by i.m. ziprasidone for acute psychotic agitation. Patients received three days of flexible-dose i.m. ziprasidone. After an initial dose of 10-20 mg, a subsequent dose of 10-20 mg could be given after 12 hours if needed (maximum daily dose: 40 mg).

RESULTS

All treatment emergent side effects and adverse events along with the investigators' assessments of severity were systematically recorded as the primary outcome. The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Behavioral Activity Rating Scale (BARS) were the secondary outcomes. Twenty-one patients, six male and 15 female, mean age 71.4 +/- 1.3 years (range: 60-81 years) were enrolled. All had completed the three days i.m. ziprasidone treatment. There was one adverse event in a patient with untreated benign prostatic hypertrophy who developed urinary retention. Two side effects of mild severity that resolved spontaneously were observed: blurred vision and sedation. The BPRS decreased by 26.8 points after three days of treatment (p = 0.001). The BARS score, reflecting agitation, decreased significantly after each injection, reaching maximal decrease of 2.14 points at completion of study (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Intramuscular ziprasidone in this series of elderly patients suggests acceptable safety and efficacy in the management of acute psychotic agitation among elderly patients with schizophrenia.

An increase in late sodium current potentiates the proarrhythmic activities of low-risk QT-prolonging drugs in female rabbit hearts

Assessment of the proarrhythmic risk associated with drugs that prolong the QT interval is difficult. We hypothesized that the proarrhythmic activities of drugs with very low to moderate risk of causing torsades de pointes would be well differentiated when the late sodium current (I(NaL)) was greater than normal. The effects of selected QT-prolonging drugs on electrical activity of female rabbit isolated hearts were determined in the absence and presence of sea anemone toxin (ATX-II; an enhancer of I(NaL)). I(NaL) recorded from ventricular myocytes isolated from female rabbit hearts was slightly increased by 1 and 3 nM ATX-II (n = 13, P < 0.01). ATX-II (1 nM) prolonged the duration of the monophasic action potential (MAPD(90)) the isolated heart by of 19 +/- 3% (P < 0.001, n = 31) and shifted the concentration-response relationships for cisapride (1-30 nM), ziprasidone (0.01-3 microM), quinidine (0.1-1 microM), and moxifloxacin (0.01-1 microM) to prolong MAPD to the left by 2- to 12-fold. In contrast, the increases in MAPD(90) caused by 1 nM ATX-II and pentobarbital were only additive, and the increases in MAPD(90) caused by ATX-II and ranolazine [(+/-)-N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-(4[2-hydroxy-3-(2-methoxyphenoxy)propyl]-1-piperazine] were less than additive. Episodes of arrhythmic activity were commonly observed, and beat-to-beat variability of action potential duration was increased, during exposure of hearts to cisapride, ziprasidone, quinidine, and moxifloxacin but not during exposure of hearts to ranolazine or pentobarbital, in the presence of ATX-II. Thus, in the female rabbit heart, ATX-II potentiated the effects of QT-prolonging drugs to increase MAPD(90) and unmasked the proarrhythmic activities of these drugs at clinically relevant drug concentrations.

Pharmacokinetics and Therapeutics of Acute Intramuscular Ziprasidone

Patients with acute psychosis often exhibit agitation, which can be distressing and hazardous to others as well as to the patient. In such psychiatric emergencies, intramuscular antipsychotic agents can be easier to administer than oral formulations, and they have the added advantage of more rapid absorption and a faster onset of action. However, intramuscular formulations of conventional antipsychotics, which have been the standard treatment, are associated with acute dystonia and other movement disorder-related adverse events. Ziprasidone is the first atypical antipsychotic to be clinically available in both intramuscular and oral formulations in the US. The intramuscular formulation of ziprasidone, ziprasidone mesylate, uses sulfobutylether beta-cyclodextrin to solubilise the drug by complexation. The pharmacokinetics of intramuscular ziprasidone include rapid attainment of therapeutic drug level (time to reach peak serum concentration [tmax]<or=60 minutes postdose), a mean terminal elimination half-life ranging from 2 to 5 hours, bioavailability of approximately 100%, exposure to drug that increases in a dose-related manner and little drug accumulation even after 3 days of repeated intramuscular administration. The metabolism and elimination of intramuscular ziprasidone have not been extensively evaluated. The principal difference between any oral versus intramuscular formulations of a drug is in first-pass metabolism. Oral ziprasidone is eliminated mainly via the hepatic route and <1% is eliminated in urine and <4% in faeces as unchanged drug. That would not be expected to change with the intramuscular route of administration. Low concentrations of ziprasidone are seen 12-18 hours after the last intramuscular injection. The rapid clearance of ziprasidone from plasma after an intramuscular administration results in little to no persistence of plasma drug level when switching from intramuscular to oral drug administration. No clinically significant age-, sex- or race-related effects on the pharmacokinetics of intramuscular or oral ziprasidone have been noted, and the tolerability and cardiovascular safety profiles of intramuscular ziprasidone have been well characterised in clinical trials.