Pharmacokinetics of Mycophenolic Acid in Live Donor Liver Transplant Patients vs Deceased Donor Liver Transplant Patients

Drug Metabolism, Drug Interactions, and Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Living Donor Liver Transplant Patients

Living donor liver transplant (LDLT) fills a critically needed gap in the number of livers available for transplant. However, little is known about the functional recovery of the liver in the donor and in the recipient after surgery. Given that both donor and recipients are treated with several drugs, it is important to characterize the time course of recovery of hepatic synthetic, metabolic, and excretory function in these patients. In the absence of data from LDLT, information on the effect of liver disease on the pharmacokinetics of medications can be used as guidance for drug dosing in LDLT patients.

Pharmacokinetics of drugs in adult living donor liver transplant patients: regulatory factors and observations based on studies in animals and humans

INTRODUCTION

Limited information is available on the pharmacokinetics of drugs in the donors and recipients following adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Given that both the donors and recipients receive multiple drug therapies, it is important to assess the pharmacokinetics of drugs used in these patients.

AREAS COVERED

Pathophysiological changes that occur post-surgery and regulatory factors that may influence pharmacokinetics of drugs, especially hepatic drug metabolism and transport in both LDLT donors and the recipients are discussed. Pharmacokinetic data in animals with partial hepatectomy are presented. Clinical pharmacokinetic data of certain drugs in LDLT recipients are further reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

It takes up to six months for the liver volume to return to normal after LDLT surgery. In the LDLT recipients, drug exposure generally is higher with lower clearance during early period post-transplant; lower initial dosages of immunosuppressants are used than deceased donor liver transplant recipients during the first six months post-transplantation. In animals, the activities of hepatic drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters are known to be altered differentially during liver regeneration. Future studies on the actual hepatic function with reference to drug metabolism, drug transport, and biliary secretion in both LDLT donors and recipients are required.

Advantage of tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil regimen for cytotoxic T cell-mediated defence and its inhibition by additive steroid administration in high-risk liver transplant recipients

Our previous work revealed that the recipients with the highest pre-existing numbers of CD8(+) effector T cells (TE ) [hyperparathyroidism (HPT)E recipients] occupied approximately 30% of adult transplant recipients performed in our hospital. HPTE recipients demonstrated very poor clinical outcome compared with the remaining 70% of recipients with the lowest pre-existing TE (LPTE recipient). This study aimed to clarify the best combined immunosuppressive regimen related to function of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) for HPTE recipients. Eighty-one HPTE recipients were classified into three types, according to the immunosuppressive regimens: type 1, tacrolimus (Tac)/glucocorticoid (GC); type 2, Tac/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/GC; and type 3, Tac/MMF. Frequencies of severe infection, rejection and hospital death were the highest in types 1 and 2, whereas the lowest occurred in type 3. The survival rate in type 3 was the highest (100%) during follow-up until post-operative day 2000. Regarding the immunological mechanism, in type 1 TE perforin and interferon (IFN)-γ were generated through the self-renewal of CD8(+) central memory T cells (TCM ), but decreased in the early post-transplant period due to marked down-regulation of interleukin (IL)-12 receptor beta-1 of TCM. In type 2, the self-renewal TCM did not develop, and the effector function could not be increased. In type 3, in contrast, the effectors and cytotoxicity were correlated inversely with IL-12Rβ1(+) TCM levels, and increased at the highest level around the pre-transplant levels of IL-12Rβ1(+) TCM . However, the immunological advantage of Tac/MMF therapy was inhibited strongly by additive steroid administration.

Mycophenolate monitoring in liver, thoracic, pancreas, and small bowel transplantation: a consensus report

Assessing the value of mycophenolic acid (MPA) monitoring outside renal transplantation is hindered by the absence of any trial comparing fixed-dose and concentration-controlled therapy. However, in liver and thoracic transplantation particularly, clinical trials, observational studies with comparison groups, and case series have described MPA efficacy, exposure/efficacy relationships, pharmacokinetic variability, and clinical outcomes relating to plasma MPA concentrations. On the basis of this evidence, this report identifies MPA as an immunosuppressant for which the combination of variable disposition, efficacy, and adverse effects contributes to interindividual differences seemingly in excess of those optimal for a fixed-dosage mycophenolate regimen. Combined with experiences of MPA monitoring in other transplant indications, the data have been rationalized to define circumstances in which measurement of MPA concentrations can contribute to improved management of mycophenolate therapy in nonrenal transplant recipients.

Variability in free mycophenolic acid exposure in adult liver transplant recipients during the early posttransplantation period

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) pharmacokinetics variability in liver transplant recipients during the early posttransplantation period may be related to changes in mycophenolic acid (MPA) protein binding. This study aimed at characterizing the variation of free MPA exposure with respect to time since transplantation. Three groups (A, B, C) were compared. The median posttransplantation time was 12 days (A, n = 26 pharmacokinetic sessions), 36 days (B, n = 25), and 867 days (C, n = 21). The median MPA AUC(0-12) in group A (26.8 mg x h/L) was significantly lower than in groups B (45.2 mg x h/L, P = .031) and C (43.5 mg x h/L, P = .004). Free MPA AUC(0-12) was comparable whatever the time (0.41, 0.34, and 0.33 mg x h/L, respectively). MPA apparent clearance (CL/F) was significantly correlated with MPA free fraction (r = 0.60, P < .0001) and approximately 1.7-fold higher in group A compared to groups B and C (P < .05). Enhanced CL/F in relation with an increase in MPA free fraction results in a low AUC of total MPA during the first postoperative month, but on average, at the population level, the exposure to free MPA is not altered, suggesting that total MPA AUC should not be used to adapt MMF dosing during this period.

Comparison of pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and its metabolites between living donor liver transplant recipients and deceased donor liver transplant recipients

Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has been considered an alternative method for treatment of patients with end-stage liver disease. However, the characteristics of pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in patients who underwent LDLT were not clear. This study was designed to compare the pharmacokinetics of MPA and its metabolites between LDLT patients and deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) patients after oral administration of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Thirteen patients who underwent LDLT and 14 patients who underwent DDLT were enrolled prospectively. All patients received oral MMF administration (1.0 g, twice daily) in combination with tacrolimus (TAC). The plasma concentrations of MPA, free MPA, glucuronide (MPAG), and acyl glucuronide (AcMPAG) was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography method. There was a wide variation in various pharmacokinetic parameters of MPA and its metabolites in patients who underwent LDLT and DDLT after oral MMF administration. Although mean MPA area under the plasma concentration time curve for 0-12 hours (AUC(0-12h)) of MPA and MPAG in DDLT patients were higher than those in LDLT patients, there was no significant difference between the two groups. MPA concentration at 6 hours (C(6h)), C(10h), C(12h), and MPA AUC(6-12h) were significantly higher in DDLT group than those in LDLT group (P < 0.05). Inversely, higher free MPA AUC(0-12h) and significant free MPA fraction (P < 0.05) in LDLT patients were observed in DDLT patients when compared with DDLT group. AcMPAG concentrations at 4, 8, and 10 hours and AcMPAG AUC(0-12h) were significantly higher in the DDLT group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, after a fixed oral dose of MMF, DDLT patients had higher enterohepatic recycling contributing to total MPA exposure compared with LDLT patients. The function of glucuronide conjugation in LDLT patients was decreased compared with that in DDLT patients. Higher free MPA AUC(0-12h) and a significantly higher fraction of free MPA in LDLT patients suggested that a lower oral dose of MMF may be administered for patients who underwent LDLT.