Nutrition Management of Small Bowel Transplant Patients

Nutrition care for the adult post-intestinal transplant patient

Intestinal transplantation has emerged as an accepted treatment choice for individuals experiencing irreversible intestinal failure. This treatment is particularly relevant for those who are not candidates or have poor response to autologous gut reconstruction or trophic hormone therapy, and who can no longer be sustained on parenteral nutrition. One of the main goals of transplant is to eliminate the need for parenteral support and its associated complications, while safely restoring complete nutrition autonomy. An intestinal transplant is a complex process that goes beyond merely replacing the intestines to provide nourishment and ceasing parenteral support. It requires an integrated management approach in the pretransplant and posttransplant setting, and high-quality nutrition treatment is one of the cornerstones leading to favorable outcomes and long-term management. Since the outset of intestinal transplant in the early 2000s, there is observed improvement of achieving nutrition autonomy sooner in the initial posttransplant phase; however, the development of nutrition complications in the chronic posttransplant period remains a long-term risk. This review delineates the decision-making process and clinical protocols used to nutritionally manage and monitor pre- and post-intestine transplant patients.

Factors Impacting on Eating in Pediatric Intestinal-Transplant Recipients: A Mixed-Methods Study

BACKGROUND

No empirical data are found examining why eating may be difficult for some children and not others following intestinal transplant. This study aimed to describe the eating behaviors and nutrition intake of intestinal-transplant-recipient children and examine factors that may impact on their eating.

METHODS

Caregivers of all (n = 34) intestinal-transplant recipients <18 years of age in the United Kingdom were invited to participate in this mixed-methods study comprising questionnaires, a 3-day food diary and interviews. Questionnaires included the Children's Eating Behaviour Questionnaire and demographic/nutrition-related items. Analysis was by descriptive statistics using SPSS. Semistructured telephone interviews explored caregiver perceptions of their child's eating. Analysis was thematic.

RESULTS

Nine caregivers were recruited and completed the questionnaire and food diary. Eight of these were interviewed. Home tube feeding was required by 77% (n = 7) of children post transplant, 56% (n = 5) were "food avoidant", and median energy intake was 93% (range, 61%-137%) of requirements. The findings revealed complex, interrelated positive and negative medical, caregiver, and child-related influences on eating. Learning to eat at the recommended age and having positive and significant pretransplant eating experiences appeared protective, whereas receiving nothing by mouth and having aversive experiences were barriers.

CONCLUSION

This study provides the first empirical evidence of factors that may influence eating after intestinal transplant in children. The findings suggest promoting eating pretransplant, when the negative physical consequences can be managed, may be protective, and there may be eating-difficulty predictors that could be used to facilitate targeted interventions.

What is the normal small bowel length in humans? first donor-based cohort analysis

Normal small bowel length (SBL) has been reported within a wide range, but never studied in a cohort of either pediatric or adult deceased donors. Between 5/2006 and 2/2011, SBL was measured in all grafts procured for intestinal transplantation at a single center and used for either isolated intestinal transplant (15) or multiorgan transplants (5) employing a standardized method. SBL was the only not significantly different variable among pediatric and adult donors divided by age 16. Furthermore, donors were classified in 3 groups: group 1: Height < 70 cm, group 2: 71-150 cm and group 3: ≥ 151 cm. Mean age was: 0.58, 5.6, 22.01 years, respectively. Mean height and weight were 65.8, 123.2, 166.1 cm (p = 0.001) and 6.9, 23.8, 65.2 kg (p = 0.001), for each group. The SBL by group was: 283.0, 324.7, 356.0 cm, remaining as the only nonsignificant variable (p = 0.06), in contrast to BMI, BSA (p = 0.001). The SBL/height ratio: 4.24, 2.7, 2.12 (p = 0.001; rho: -0.623) or SBL/BSA ratio was 8.36, 3.7, and 2.03, respectively (p : 0.0001; rho: -0.9). SBL does not increase with growth like other anthropometric variables. The SBL/height ratio significantly decreases with growth; however, bowel diameter increases, which needs further evaluation.

Intestinal transplantation: a review

Parenteral nutrition is a life-saving therapy for patients with intestinal failure. Intestinal transplantation is now recognized as a treatment for patients who develop complications of parenteral nutrition and in whom attempts at intestinal rehabilitation have failed. Patients with parenteral nutrition related liver disease will require a liver graft typically part of a multivisceral transplant. Isolated intestinal transplants are more commonly performed in adults while multivisceral transplants are most commonly performed in infants. Isolated intestinal transplants have the best short-term outcome, with over 80 % survival at 1 year. Patients requiring multivisceral transplants have a high rate of attrition with a 1 year survival less than 70 %. Prognostic factors for a poor outcome include patient hospitalization at the time of transplant and donor age greater than 40 years while systemic sepsis and acute rejection are the major determinant of early postoperative outcome. For patients surviving the first year the outcome of transplantation of the liver in addition to intestine affords some survival advantage though long-term outcome does not yet match other abdominal organs. Outcomes for intestinal retransplantation are poor as a result of immunology and patient debility. Overall intestinal transplantation continues to develop and is a clear indication with cost and quality of life advantages in patients with intestinal failure that do not remain stable on parenteral nutrition.

Intestine transplantation in children: update 2010

This article reviews the current status of pediatric intestinal transplantation, focusing on referral and listing criteria, surgical techniques, patient management, monitoring, complications after transplant, and short- and long-term patient outcome. Intestine transplantation has become the standard of care for children who develop life-threatening complications associated with intestinal failure. The results of intestinal failure treatment have significantly improved in the last decade following the establishment of gut rehabilitation programs and advances in transplant immunosuppressive protocols, surgical techniques, and posttransplant monitoring. The 1-year patient survival is now 80% and more than 80% of the children who survive the transplant are weaned off parenteral nutrition. Early referral for pretransplant assessment and careful follow-up after transplant with prompt recognition and treatment of transplant-related complications are key factors contributing to superior patient outcomes and survival. The best results are being obtained at high-volume centers with survival rates of up to 75% at 5 years.

Update on intestinal rehabilitation after intestinal transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The past decade has seen improvements in patient selection and a greater range of surgical procedures available to patients with intestinal failure, and this, combined with more effective immunosuppressive regimens, has transformed survival after intestinal transplantation (ITx). Much more is known about optimizing rehabilitation of the engrafted intestine in the first 12 months after transplant, but it is also becoming apparent that there are some long-term health issues to consider.

RECENT FINDINGS

The key issues in rehabilitation of ITx are the immunogenic nature of the intestinal graft, which means a higher risk of rejection and necessitates relatively high levels of immune suppression that promotes infections, including Epstein-Barr virus-driven lymphoma, viral gastroenteritis and renal impairment; and those related to the specifics of an intestinal allograft (nutritional support, chylous ascites, growth, food allergy, fat soluble vitamin deficiencies, metabolic bone disease). In this article, recent publications about approaches for establishing nutrition and methods for monitoring the health of the ITx patient are reviewed.

SUMMARY

ITx appears to be cost-effective compared with parenteral nutrition, but ITx recipients continue to be vulnerable to infections, nutritional deficiencies and rejection over the long-term and, therefore, require support from and involvement of a multidisciplinary team for patients to become safely integrated with their local community.

Review of incidence and management of chylous ascites after small bowel transplantation

Nutrition management of intestinal transplant recipients continues to be a challenging and essential component of the early postoperative care of this patient population. The absorptive capacity of the graft can be affected by immunologic and nonimmunologic factors, including enteric lymphatic disruption, preservation injury, central denervation, viral enteritis, systemic infections, and rejection. Chylous ascites, the extravasation of milky chyle into the peritoneal fluid, defined by elevated triglycerides levels of > or = 200 mg/dL, can occur as a result of trauma, obstruction, or interruption of the lymphatic system. It seems the incidence of chylous ascites after small bowel transplantation is low; however, this may be due in part to the limitation of enteral long-chain triglycerides in the early posttransplant period of 2-6 weeks. After this time frame, clinical evidence suggests that fat assimilation normalizes. In the event that chylous ascites develop as a posttransplant complication, limitation of oral or enteral nutrition support to a very-low-fat regimen may be required, or parenteral nutrition (PN) will need to be provided until clinical status improves. Long-term posttransplant, lymphatic regeneration generally occurs and the majority of intestinal transplant recipients achieve the ultimate goal of nutrition autonomy.