Enteral feeding in the critically injured patient

Placement of fully covered self-expandable metal stents in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer before neoadjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

Most patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer requiring neoadjuvant therapy have significant dysphagia.

OBJECTIVE

To report our experience in using a fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) to treat malignant dysphagia and for maintenance of nutritional support during neoadjuvant therapy.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Two tertiary-care referral centers.

PATIENTS

This study involved 55 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (50 adenocarcinoma, 5 squamous cell carcinoma). Forty-three patients were men, and the mean age was 65.8 years.

INTERVENTION

EUS followed by FCSEMS placement.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Procedural success, dysphagia scores, patient weights, stent migration, and stent-related complications.

RESULTS

All stents were successfully placed. Tumors were located in the middle esophagus (n = 10) and distal esophagus (n = 45). The mean dysphagia score obtained at 1 week after stent placement had improved significantly from baseline (2.4 and 1, respectively; P < .001). Patients maintained their weights at 1 month follow-up when compared with baseline (153 and 149 pounds, respectively; P = .58). Immediate complications included chest discomfort in 13 patients; 2 patients required stent removal because of intractable pain. One patient had stent removal because of significant acid reflux. Stent migration occurred at some point in 17 of 55 patients (31%). There was a delayed perforation in 1 patient. Because of disease progression or the discovery of metastasis after neoadjuvant therapy, only 8 of 55 patients underwent curative surgery.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study.

CONCLUSION

Placement of FCSEMSs in patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer significantly improves dysphagia and allows for oral nutrition during neoadjuvant therapy. FCSEMSs appear to be effective for palliating dysphagia. Migration was not associated with injury or harm to the patient and usually represented a positive response to neoadjuvant therapy. Few patients undergoing stenting in this situation ultimately undergo surgery because of disease progression or poor operative candidacy.

Presidential address: imagination trumps knowledge

Multiple organ failure (MOF) emerged 30 years ago and became our research focus. Over the years, we have proposed a series of cartoons that rallied multidisciplinary translational research teams around common themes to generate "win-win" hypotheses that when tested (right or wrong) have advanced our understanding of MOF. MOF has a bimodal trajectory, and the gut plays a role in both trajectories. Early MOF occurs because of excessive proinflammation (ie, systemic inflammatory response syndrome [SIRS]), and early gut ischemia-reperfusion can amplify SIRS and contribute to the early fulminant SIRS-MOF trajectory. Fortunately, most patients survive early SIRS, but some develop excessive anti-inflammation (ie, compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome). The gut also plays a role in this late indolent compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome-MOF trajectory. Multiple factors cause progressive gut dysfunction such that the gut (an important immunologic organ) worsens compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome and becomes the reservoir for pathogens and toxins that cause late sepsis.

Self-expanding plastic esophageal stents versus jejunostomy tubes for the maintenance of nutrition during neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with esophageal cancer: a retrospective study

In patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer, the inability to eat may severely impair nutritional status. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the efficacy of the Polyflex self-expanding silicone stent (PS) versus a jejunostomy tube (JT) for maintaining nutrition during neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with esophageal cancer who were scheduled for resectional surgery. Thirty-six patients were treated either with PS placement (12 patients) or JT placement (24 patients) prior to receiving an 8-week course of chemoradiation therapy. Patients were interviewed weekly until cessation of therapy. Patient data were collected on procedural success and complication rates, nutritional status, and dysphagia scores. PS placement was successful in 11 of 12 patients (92%), and those 11 patients were able to resume oral nutrition. Dysphagia scores improved from a mean of 3 to 1 in the PS group (P < 0.005) but did not change significantly in the JT group. PS were removed endoscopically without complications prior to the esophagectomies. Albumin levels and weight increased significantly in both the PS and JT groups. There were no significant differences between groups in the procedural success rates (PS 92% vs. JT 100%, P = 0.33), complication rates (PS 22% vs. JT 4%, P = 0.11), mean increase in weight (PS 4.4 kg vs. JT 4.2 kg, P = 0.59), and mean increase in serum albumin (PS 0.62 g/dL vs. JT 0.44 g/dL, P = 0.05). PS is a safe and effective alternative to a surgical JT for maintaining nutrition in this subset of patients.

Expandable polyester silicon-covered stent for malignant esophageal strictures before neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a pilot study

Patients with resectable esophageal cancer often require placement of a surgical jejunostomy tube prior to receiving chemoradiation so as to maintain adequate nutrition due to their inability to swallow and eat. This study reports a single institutional experience with the Polyflex self-expanding silicone stent (Riisch; Kernen. Germany) in patients with malignant stenosis receiving chemoradiation prior to esophagectomy. This was a retrospective, nonrandomized study of 6 patients who underwent Polyflex esophageal stent placement across a malignant stricture prior to receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation. The study assessed procedural success, restoration of oral nutrition, migration, and removal of the Polyflex stent. The outcomes measured were the efficacy of treatment, stent-related complications, and changes in the nutritional status of the patient after stent placement. Stent placement was successful in 5 of 6 patients (83%). Restoration of oral nutrition after stent placement occurred in 5 of 5 patients (100%). Migration of the stent into the stomach occurred in 3 patients (60%) without occurrence of gastric outlet obstruction; there was no proximal migration. Stents were successfully removed endoscopically or at the time of esophagectomy. This early experience suggests that the removable silicone Polyflex stent is an effective alternative to a surgical jejunostomy tube for the management of malignant esophageal stenosis in patients for whom neoadjuvant chemoradiation is planned prior to esophagectomy.

Reducing costs and patient morbidity in the enterally fed intensive care unit patient

BACKGROUND

Critically ill patients are at high risk for nosocomial infections and resultant organ dysfunction and death. These patients typically have protracted intensive care unit (ICU) courses and consume increasingly limited resources. Enteral nutrition with specific immune-modulating components has been previously shown to improve outcomes in select populations of patients, but results have been mixed in critically ill patients. Impact 1.5 (Novartis Nutrition, Minneapolis, MN) is a commercially available enteral formula containing ingredients known to improve several parameters of immune function. We hypothesized that administration of Impact 1.5 tube feedings would reduce the incidence of nosocomial infection and ICU resources in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU for severe trauma, burns, or sepsis insults.

METHODS

The Impact 1.5 group (n = 17) was compared with a historical cohort of ICU patients (n = 21) of similar illness severity that received a standard high-energy enteral formula. The incidence of nosocomial infections and mortality, and the consumption of multiple ICU resources were examined. A cost analysis based on these results was then performed to determine the cost effectiveness of this proprietary immunonutrition enteral formula.

RESULTS

A pronounced reduction in nosocomial pneumonia (12% vs 52%, p < .01) was identified, with consequent trends toward a reduction in duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay. Urinary tract infections that may have less influence on ICU resources were increased in the Impact 1.5 group. No difference in mortality was identified, despite the inclusion of patients with severe sepsis in the study group. According to the average number of ICU days required for each study cohort, the Impact 1.5 group led to a cost savings of at least $193,350.00.

CONCLUSIONS

ICU patients with significant illness severity experienced a decrease in the incidence of an important nosocomial infection that is commonly associated with increased use of ICU resources and length of stay. This decrease in patient morbidity led to substantial cost savings despite the small size of our study trial.

The need for aggressive nutritional intervention in the injured patient: the development of a predictive model

Early nutritional intervention has been advocated in trauma patients. We have developed a model to identify those patients who will most benefit from the invasive and costly measures that are required to provide injured patients with early enteral feedings. Four hundred forty-two patients admitted to a level I trauma center during a 2-month period were evaluated using 21 clinical variables. Time to tolerance of a regular diet was used as the dependent variable in a step-wise regression, and then the selected variables were used to build a classification and regression tree to predict tolerance of a regular diet within 5 days. Our findings demonstrate that intensive care unit disposition, Injury Severity Score, Abdominal Trauma Index, and the need for early surgical intervention are important predictors regarding the need for early nutritional intervention. When the model was applied to the study population, it had a sensitivity of 83%, a specificity of 84%, and an accuracy of 84%.