Integrated Family, General Practice and Mental Health Care in the Management of Schizophrenia

Problem solving as a core strategy in the prevention of schizophrenia and other mental disorders

OBJECTIVE

To outline the rationale for implementing training in structured problem solving as a primary prevention strategy for major mental disorders.

METHOD

The evidence that training people in a structured method of solving their personal problems is an effective strategy in the treatment of established cases of schizophrenic and major mood disorders, is selectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Most of the relevant research focused on the prevention of major recurrent episodes of psychosis. There is some evidence to support the hypothesis that this strategy may assist many people to achieve a full and sustained recovery from the clinical and social impairments of these disorders, especially when patients are taught to use structured problem solving with members of their personal resource groups, and they continue to take optimal doses of psychoactive medication. There is support for the hypothesis that the key therapeutic factor associated with these benefits is the improved efficiency of the management of life stress.

CONCLUSIONS

The simplicity of problem solving, the educational methods used, and the widespread application to a person's lifestyle would appear to make this a possible candidate for a primary prevention program for major mental disorders. Guidebooks and teaching aids have been developed and show excellent consumer acceptance.

Characteristics of severely mentally ill patients in and out of contact with community mental health services

Community mental health nurses have been criticized for failing to prioritize work with people with a severe or enduring mental illness, many of whom have no contact with specialist mental health services and rely entirely on their general practitioner and primary care team. It is important to ensure that those in contact with specialist services actually need this level of input but, conversely, that those in contact with only primary care receive a service that is equipped to meet their needs. This study examines the differences between these two groups of patients. A sample of 253 community-based patients with a severe or enduring mental illness was divided into those with mental health service contact and those without. Differences in the demographic characteristics of the two groups were assessed and further, more detailed, comparisons were made with a sub-sample of 49 individuals randomly drawn from this larger sample. Instruments adopted for these purposes comprised the Camberwell Assessment of Need and the Life Fulfilment Scale. It was found that patients with a psychotic disorder were more likely than those with neurosis to be in contact with mental health services and patients with schizophrenia were significantly more likely to be on the active caseload of a community mental health nurse than those from all other diagnostic groups. However, patients' levels of need, unmet need and quality of life did not differ in relation to their service contact. Whilst the study provides limited evidence that community mental health nurses are targeting people with the most serious disorders, questions remain about the large proportion not receiving specialist care. Because primary care plays a significant role in the care of severely mentally ill people living in the community, the further mental health training of general practitioners and practice nurses is becoming increasingly important.

Sharing care: the psychiatrist in the family physician's office

OBJECTIVE

One way of strengthening ties between primary care providers and psychiatrists is for a psychiatrist to visit a primary care practice on a regular basis to see and discuss patients and to provide educational input and advice for family physicians. This paper reviews the experiences of a program in Hamilton, Ontario that brings psychiatrists and counsellors into the offices of 88 local family physicians in 36 practices.

METHOD

Data are presented based on the activities of psychiatrists working in 13 practices over a 2-year period. Data were gathered from forms routinely completed by family physicians when making a referral and by psychiatrists whenever they saw a new case. An annual satisfaction questionnaire for all providers participating in the program was also used to gather information.

RESULTS

Over a 2-year period, 1021 patients were seen in consultation by one full-time equivalent psychiatrist. The average duration of a consultation was 51 minutes, and a family member was present for 12% of the visits. Twenty-one percent of the patients were seen for at least one follow-up visit, 75% of which were prearranged. In addition, 1515 cases were discussed during these visits without the patient being seen. All participants had a high satisfaction rating for their involvement with the project.

CONCLUSIONS

Benefits of this approach include increased accessibility to psychiatric consultation, enhanced continuity of care, support for family physicians, and improved communication between psychiatrists and family physicians. This model, which has great potential for innovative approaches to continuing education and resident placements, demands new skills of participating psychiatrists.

Integrating mental health services within primary care. A Canadian program

The increasingly prominent role of the family physician in delivering mental health care can be enhanced if productive and collaborative relationships can be established with local mental health services. This paper describes a Canadian program that has achieved this by bringing mental health counselors and psychiatrists into the offices of 87 family physicians in 35 practices in a community in Southern Ontario. The paper describes the program, the activities of counselors and psychiatrists within the practices, and the administrative structures set up to coordinate these activities. Data is presented from the evaluation of the first year of the program's operation (13 practices and 45 family physicians) during which time 3085 referrals were received. The program made mental health care more available and accessible, increased continuity of care, provided additional support for the family physician, offered new opportunities for continuing education, and led to a reduced and more efficient use of other mental health services. The components of the program can be adapted to most communities.

The role of the general practitioner in the treatment of schizophrenia: general principles

In light of the emphasis on community care for schizophrenia and the increasing role likely to be played by general practitioners, this paper describes some of the general principles involved in the treatment of this disorder and provides a set of practical guidelines to assist general practitioners.

Care of schizophrenia in general practice: the general practitioner and the patient

BACKGROUND

The transfer of patients with chronic schizophrenia from large mental hospitals into the community has had an impact on the role of the general practitioner in the effective delivery of primary care services to these patients.

AIM

A study was undertaken to assess the care available in general practice for patients with schizophrenia, the attitudes of general practitioners and patients to the care provided and the factors influencing patients' use of services.

METHOD

Eighty three patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and 26 doctors in 13 London practices registered on the VAMP research bank took part in a series of structured and semi-structured interviews. This was followed by a systematic examination of the patients' case notes.

RESULTS

Only 14 patients (17%) had no active symptoms according to the present state examination interview and 52 (63%) were currently taking antipsychotic medication. Fifty three patients were in contact with a psychiatrist. Approximately one quarter of patients were visited by a community psychiatric nurse; in 18 of these 19 cases, the main reason for contact was reported to be for administration of medication by depot injection. In all but one case, patients seeing a community psychiatric nurse were also being seen by a psychiatrist. Sixteen doctors reported having had a consultation in the previous month with a patient's relative, friend or member of hostel staff. There were considerable differences between patients and their doctors in their attitudes to the use of services. Of the 26 general practitioners, 23 were enthusiastic about the possibility of introducing shared care records. Of the 54 patients in contact with a mental health professional, only 18 favoured the use of shared care records. Most of the doctors (19, 73%) reported they would welcome a psychiatric liaison service in their practice; 40% of 53 patients said they would not. Patients receiving antipsychotic drugs and patients registered with inner city practices attended their general practitioners more frequently than those not taking antipsychotic medication and those registered with suburban practices. Use of antipsychotic medication (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 8.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.2 to 30.7, P < 0.01), male sex (OR 5.8, 95% CI 1.5 to 22.1, P < 0.01) and active symptoms on the present state examination (OR 4.1, 95% CI 1.0 to 17.5, P = 0.06) were all predictive of current contact with mental health professionals.

CONCLUSION

Family doctors were closely involved with the care of patients with schizophrenia and their relatives and were eager for increased liaison with secondary care services. Although patients were more resistant than doctors to management innovations this may reflect lack of familiarity with changes in community services. Greater input is needed by mental health professionals, particularly community psychiatric nurses, and some consideration of the burden of care in inner city practices is necessary in health service planning.

Assertive community treatment for the seriously mentally ill in suburban Sydney: a programme description and evaluation

Assertive and intensive community treatment for the seriously mentally ill is becoming a widely accepted approach internationally. This type of service is, however, still relatively new in Australia and New Zealand, and it has rarely been fully integrated into a comprehensive catchment area community and hospital mental health service. This paper has two aims. Firstly, it describes an innovative assertive community mental health service in suburban Sydney. This service was initially provided to 64 clients with a serious mental illness, who had previously experienced repeated hospitalisations and were unable to benefit from existing high quality services. Secondly, it presents the results of the ongoing evaluation of this service. Following the implementation of the service, the number of psychiatric bed days occupied by these clients decreased by 62%; the number of clients admitted decreased, client functioning improved and symptom severity decreased, all to a significant degree.

Early intervention in schizophrenia

The management of schizophrenia may be characterised by two paradigms. The first approaches the schizophrenias as episodic relapsing disorders, where treatment is provided through both acute (crisis) care and to achieve prophylaxis. The second paradigm, sometimes arising from a failure of the first, is of "rehabilitation", involving amelioration of disabilities, occasionally within a framework of relative asylum. We would propose a third paradigm of "early intervention", involving a combination of medical and psychosocial interventions targeted at young, vulnerable people with the aim of preventing or limiting likely social, psychological and mental deterioration. Vigorous intervention early in the course of illness, early recognition and treatment of relapse and the promotion of psychological adjustment to psychotic illness are proposed as key elements of this third paradigm.