• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4611584)   Today's Articles (1831)   Subscriber (49382)
For:  [Subscribe] [Scholar Register]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Lazard DS, Lee HJ, Truy E, Giraud AL. Bilateral reorganization of posterior temporal cortices in post-lingual deafness and its relation to cochlear implant outcome. Hum Brain Mapp 2012;34:1208-19. [PMID: 22287085 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2011] [Revised: 09/05/2011] [Accepted: 10/06/2011] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]  Open
2
Lazard DS, Bordure P, Lina-Granade G, Magnan J, Meller R, Meyer B, Radafy E, Roux PE, Gnansia D, Péan V, Truy E. Speech perception performance for 100 post-lingually deaf adults fitted with Neurelec cochlear implants: Comparison between Digisonic® Convex and Digisonic® SP devices after a 1-year follow-up. Acta Otolaryngol 2010;130:1267-73. [PMID: 20446821 DOI: 10.3109/00016481003769972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
3
Tuulikki Välimaa T, Juhani Löppönen H. Comparison of the body-worn CIS-PRO + and the behind-the-ear-worn TEMPO + cochlear implant systems in Finnish-speaking adult CI users: any differences in results with experienced listeners? Acta Otolaryngol 2008;128:984-91. [PMID: 19086195 DOI: 10.1080/00016480701793727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
4
Baumgartner WD, Jappel A, Morera C, Gstöttner W, Müller J, Kiefer J, Van De Heyning P, Anderson I, Nielsen SB. Outcomes in adults implanted with the FLEXsoft electrode. Acta Otolaryngol 2007;127:579-86. [PMID: 17503226 DOI: 10.1080/00016480600987784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
5
van der Beek FB, Soede W, Frijns JHM. Evaluation of the Benefit for Cochlear Implantees of Two Assistive Directional Microphone Systems in an Artificial Diffuse Noise Situation. Ear Hear 2007;28:99-110. [PMID: 17204902 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0b013e31802d0a55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
6
Nie K, Barco A, Zeng FG. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception. Ear Hear 2006;27:208-17. [PMID: 16518146 DOI: 10.1097/01.aud.0000202312.31837.25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
7
Khan AM, Whiten DM, Nadol JB, Eddington DK. Histopathology of human cochlear implants: correlation of psychophysical and anatomical measures. Hear Res 2006;205:83-93. [PMID: 15953517 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2004] [Accepted: 03/03/2005] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
8
Gstöttner W, Pok SM, Peters S, Kiefer J, Adunka O. Kochleaimplantat mit Tieftonrestgehörerhalt. HNO 2005;53:784-90. [PMID: 15657755 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-004-1170-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
9
Bassim MK, Buss E, Clark MS, Kolln KA, Pillsbury CH, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CA. MED-EL Combi40+ Cochlear Implantation in Adults. Laryngoscope 2005;115:1568-73. [PMID: 16148696 DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000171023.72680.95] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
10
Vandali AE, Sucher C, Tsang DJ, McKay CM, Chew JWD, McDermott HJ. Pitch ranking ability of cochlear implant recipients: a comparison of sound-processing strategies. THE JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2005;117:3126-38. [PMID: 15957780 DOI: 10.1121/1.1874632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
11
Iglehart F. Speech Perception by Students With Cochlear Implants Using Sound-Field Systems in Classrooms. Am J Audiol 2004;13:62-72. [PMID: 15248805 DOI: 10.1044/1059-0889(2004/009)] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]  Open
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA