Baseline Low Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts Poor Survival in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinomas Treated With Radical Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

A nomogram based on clinical characteristics and nutritional indicators for relative and absolute weight loss during radiotherapy in initially inoperable patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Radiation for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma often is accompanied by radiation esophagitis, which interferes with oral intake. We aimed to develop a nomogram model to identify initially inoperable patients with relative and absolute weight loss who need prophylactic nutritional supplementation.

METHODS

A total of 365 initially inoperable patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving radiotherapy between January 2018 and December 2022 were included in the study, which was divided into discovery and validation cohorts. Receiver operating characteristic and Kaplan-Meier curve analyses were performed to compare the areas under the curve and survival benefits.

RESULTS

A total of 42.2% (154 of 365) of the patients had been diagnosed with cancer cachexia. The malnourished group had a higher interruption rate of radiotherapy and number of complication diseases (P < 0.05). Meanwhile, patients with malnutrition had lower lymphocytes and prognostic nutritional index (P < 0.05). The combined index showed a higher area under the curve value (0.67; P < 0.001) than number of complication diseases (area under the curve = 0.52) and prognostic nutritional index (area under the curve = 0.49) for relative weight loss (≥ 5%). Similarly, the combined index had a higher area under the curve value (0.79; P < 0.001) than number of complication diseases (area under the curve = 0.56), treatment regimens (area under the curve = 0.56), subcutaneous fat thickness (area under the curve = 0.60), pretreatment body weight (area under the curve = 0.61), neutrophils (area under the curve = 0.56), and prognostic nutritional index (area under the curve = 0.50) for absolute weight loss (≥ 5 kg). Absolute and relative weight loss remained independent prognostic factors, with short overall survival rates compared with the normal group (P < 0.05). Patients with high nomogram scores supported by nutritional intervention had less weight loss, better nutrition scores, and increased plasma CD8+ T cells, and interferon gamma.

CONCLUSIONS

We developed a nomogram model that was intended to estimate relative and absolute weight loss in initially inoperable patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma during radiotherapy, which might help facilitate an objective decision on prophylactic nutritional supplementation.

May Nutritional Status Positively Affect Disease Progression and Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal and Pharyngeal Cancers? A Scoping Review of the Current Clinical Studies

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition in esophageal and pharyngeal cancer patients constitutes a common and serious concern, which significantly reduces patients' prognoses. Cancers of the esophagus and the pharynx can considerably impair feeding in patients, resulting in severe undernutrition. This is a scoping review that intends to critically analyze the most well-designed clinical studies investigating the potential beneficial impact of diverse nutritional assessment tools on the prognosis of patients with esophageal and pharyngeal cancers.

METHODS

The most accurate and remarkable scientific databases were comprehensively explored utilizing relative keywords to detect clinical studies that investigate whether nutritional status may affect disease prognosis.

RESULTS

Several assessment tools have evaluated and highlighted the potential beneficial impact of nutritional status on disease progression and patients' prognosis in both esophageal and pharyngeal cancers. Regarding esophageal cancer, CONUT, PNI, PG-SGA, and NRS-2002 are more commonly used, while albumin is also frequently evaluated. Regarding pharyngeal cancers, fewer studies are currently available. PNI has been evaluated, and its significance as a factor for shorter survival' times has been highlighted. The Comprehensive Nutritional Index has also been evaluated with positive results, as well as NRS 2002, GPS, and body-weight status. However, there is currently a lack of studies with an adequate number of women with cancer. An international literature gap was identified concerning follow-up studies with adequate methodology.

CONCLUSIONS

Nutritional status may significantly affect disease progression and patients' survival, highlighting the significance of a great nutritional status in individuals with esophageal and pharyngeal cancers. Further large-scale and well-designed prospective surveys should be performed to verify the potential beneficial effects of adequate nourishment in people suffering from cancer of the esophagus and pharynx.

Valero's host index is useful in predicting radiation-induced trismus and osteoradionecrosis of the jaw risks in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

In the absence of previous research, we sought to assess the H-Index's predictive significance for radiation-induced trismus (RIT) and osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORNJ) in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The research comprised 295 LA-NPC patients who had C-CRT and pre- and post-C-CRT oral exams between June 2010 and December 2021. The H-Index was calculated using neutrophils, monocytes, lymphocytes, hemoglobin, and albumin measurements obtained on the first day of C-CRT. Patients were divided into three and two H-index groups, respectively, based on previously established cutoff values (1.5 and 3.5) and the cutoff value determined by our receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The primary objective was the presence of any significant connections between pretreatment H-Index groups and post-C-CRT RIT and ORNJ rates.

RESULTS

RIT and ORNJ was diagnosed in 46 (15.6%) and 13 (7.8%) patients, respectively. The original H-Index grouping could only categorize RIT and ORNJ risks at a cutoff value of 3.5, with no significant differences in RIT and ORNJ rates between groups with H-Index 1.5 and 1.5 to 3.5 (P < 0.05 for each). The ideal H-Index cutoff for both RIT and ORNJ rates was found to be 5.5 in ROC curve analysis, which divided the entire research population into two groups: H-Index ≤ 5.5 (N = 195) and H-Index > 5.5 (N = 110). Intergroup comparisons revealed that patients in the H-Index > 5.5 group had significantly higher rates of either RIT (31.8% vs. 5.9%; P < 0.001) or ORNJ (17.3% vs. 2.2%; P < 0.001) than their H-Index ≤ 5.5 counterparts. The results of the multivariate analysis showed that H-Index > 5.5 was independently linked to significantly higher RIT (P < 0.001) and ORNJ (P < 0.001) rates.

CONCLUSION

Pre-C-CRT H-Index > 5.5 is associated with significantly increased RIT and ORNJ rates in LA-NPC patients receiving definitive C-CRT.

The prognostic nutritional index represents a novel inflammation-nutrition-based prognostic factor for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Purpose

This study explored the relationship between the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and overall survival rate (OS) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and established and validated an effective nomogram to predict clinical outcomes.

Methods

This study included 618 patients newly diagnosed with locoregionally advanced NPC. They were divided into training and validation cohorts at a ratio of 2:1 based on random numbers. The primary endpoint of this study was OS, progression-free survival (PFS) was the second endpoint. A nomogram was drawn from the results of multivariate analyses. Harrell's concordance index (C-index), area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC), and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the clinical usefulness and predictive ability of the nomogram and were compared to the current 8th edition of the International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee (UICC/AJCC) staging system.

Results

The PNI cutoff value was 48.1. Univariate analysis revealed that age (p < 0.001), T stage (p < 0.001), N stage (p = 0.036), tumor stage (p < 0.001), PNI (p = 0.001), lymphocyte-neutrophil ratio (NLR, p = 0.002), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH, p = 0.009) were significantly associated with OS, age (p = 0.001), T-stage (p < 0.001), tumor stage (p < 0.001), N-stage (p = 0.011), PNI (p = 0.003), NLR (p = 0.051), and LDH (p = 0.03) were significantly associated with PFS. Multivariate analysis showed that age (p < 0.001), T-stage (p < 0.001), N-stage(p = 0.02), LDH (p = 0.032), and PNI (p = 0.006) were significantly associated with OS, age (p = 0.004), T-stage (<0.001), N-stage (<0.001), PNI (p = 0.022) were significantly associated with PFS. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.702 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.653-0.751). The Akaike information criterion (AIC) value of the nomogram for OS was 1142.538. The C-index of the TNM staging system was 0.647 (95% CI, 0.594-0.70) and the AIC was 1163.698. The C-index, DCA, and AUC of the nomogram demonstrated its clinical value and higher overall net benefit compared to the 8th edition of the TNM staging system.

Conclusion

The PNI represents a new inflammation-nutrition-based prognostic factor for patients with NPC. In the proposed nomogram, PNI and LDH were present, which led to a more accurate prognostic prediction than the current staging system for patients with NPC.

Low prognostic nutritional index is associated with poor outcome in middle-aged and elderly patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and age are effective prognostic factors for patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and an interaction between them may exist. However, the age cutoff value is generally set at 45 years in current studies. The clinical implications of PNI in middle-aged and elderly patients are unclear. Therefore, we aimed to uncover this issue.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 132 middle-aged and elderly (≥ 45 years old) patients with non-metastatic NPC. The association between covariates and the PNI was analyzed using ² or t-test. The effect of PNI on the prognosis was evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Unadjusted and multivariate-adjusted models were applied. Stratified and interactive analyses were performed to investigate the potential source of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Median age (61.0 years versus 59.5 years) and the proportion of patients aged ≥ 60 years (57.6% versus 50.0%) in the low-PNI group were higher than those in the high-PNI group (P > 0.05). The patients with a low PNI had shorter overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.80-0.93; P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.87-0.99; P = 0.034). The results remained stable after three adjusted models of covariates, including age (P < 0.05). No significant interactions were observed in middle-aged (45-59 years) and elderly (≥ 60 years) subgroups for OS and PFS (P for interaction > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although there is an interaction between PNI and age, PNI is an independent prognostic factor in middle-aged and elderly patients with non-metastatic NPC.

Prognostic nutritional index and its dynamics after curative treatment are independent prognostic factors on survival in non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

We aimed to identify the prognostic and predictive values of post-treatment prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and PNI dynamics in nasopharyngeal cancer patients (NPC) in this study.

METHODS

One hundred seven non-metastatic NPC patients were included. PNI was calculated by using the following formula: [10 × serum albumin value (gr/dL)] + [0.005 × total lymphocyte count (per mm3)]. ROC analysis was used for determining prognostic PNI values and univariate and multivariate statistical analyses for prognostic characterization of PNI.

RESULTS

The statistically significant cut-off values for pre- and post-treatment PNI were 50.65 and 44.75, respectively. Of the pre-treatment PNI analysis, PNI ≤ 50.65 group had shorter loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS). Furthermore, for post-treatment PNI analysis, PNI ≤ 44.75 group had shorter LRRFS and OS. In univariate analysis, only pre-treatment PNI was associated with LRRFS and DMFS, while pre- and post-treatment PNI were both associated with OS. In multivariate analysis, both PNI were independent prognostic markers for OS. In the combined analysis, pre- and post-treatment PNI, differences between the groups were statistically significant, and the PNI dynamics was an independent prognostic indicator for OS.

CONCLUSION

PNI is a useful, independent prognostic marker for non-metastatic NPC patients. It is used for either pre- or post-treatment patients. Furthermore, changes in pre-treatment PNI value after curative treatment is a significant indicator for OS.

Low Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index Predicts Poor Prognosis in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Treated with Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

Purpose

We aimed to retrospectively investigate the prognostic worth of pretreatment advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT). Patients and Methods. A total of 164 LA-NPC patients treated with cisplatinum-based definitive C-CRT were included in this retrospective cohort analysis. The convenience of ideal pre-C-CRT ALI cut-offs affecting survival results was searched by employing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. The primary endpoint was the link between the ALI groups and overall survival (OS), while cancer-specific survival (CSS), locoregional progression-free survival [LR(PFS)], distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and PFS comprised the secondary endpoints.

Results

The ROC curve analyses distinguished a rounded ALI cut-off score of 24.2 that arranged the patients into two cohorts [ALI ≥ 24.2 (N = 94) versus < 24.2 (N = 70)] with significantly distinct CSS, OS, DMFS, and PFS outcomes, except for the LRPFS. At a median follow-up time of 79.2 months (range: 6–141), the comparative analyses showed that ALI < 24.2 cohort had significantly shorter median CSS, OS, DMFS, and PFS time than the ALI ≥ 24.2 cohort (P < 0.001for each), which retained significance at 5- (P < 0.001) and 10-year (P < 0.001) time points. In multivariate analyses, ALI < 24.2 was asserted to be an independent predictor of the worse prognosis for each endpoint (P < 0.001for each) in addition to the tumor stage (T-stage) (P < 0.05 for all endpoints) and nodal stage (N-stage) (P < 0.05 for all endpoints).

Conclusion

As a novel prognostic index, the pretreatment ALI < 24.2 appeared to be strongly associated with significantly diminished survival outcomes in LA-NPC patients treated with C-CRT independent of the universally recognized T- and N-stages.

Prognostic Significance of Pretreatment Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have investigated the pretreatment prognostic nutritional index (PNI) as a prognostic factor in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC); however, the results remained inconsistent. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of PNI in patients with NPC through conducting meta-analysis. Methods: Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for low PNI of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), loco-regional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Results: Totally, eight studies involving 4299 patients were included in this meta-analysis. A low pretreatment PNI was associated with poor OS (HR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.55-2.33, P < 0.001), DMFS (HR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.69-2.44, P < 0.001), PFS (HR = 1.57, 95% CI = 1.31-1.90, P < 0.001), and CSS (HR = 2.29, 95% CI = 1.54-3.42, P < 0.001). The subgroup analysis showed that low PNI remained a significant factor for poor OS, DMFS, and PFS irrespective of treatment, country, and cutoff value of PNI. In addition, low PNI was correlated to female gender (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.12-1.62, P = 0.002), older age (OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.17-2.62, P = 0.007), and T3-T4 stage (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.06-1.53, P = 0.011). Conclusions: A low PNI was associated with poor survival outcomes in patients with NPC. Moreover, PNI could serve as an index to help guide clinical management for older patients.

Prognostic value of prognostic nutritional index in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A meta-analysis containing 4511 patients

OBJECTIVES

The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) is an index reflecting the nutritional and inflammatory status of patients and is explored for prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, the data are conflicting. In the current study, a meta-analysis was performed to comprehensively clarify the association between PNI and prognosis of NPC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang database were searched up to July 25, 2020. Hazard ratio (HR) and with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to assess the impact of PNI on the survival outcomes of patients with NPC.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies containing with 4511 patients were identified. The pooled results showed that NPC patients with a low PNI would have a worse overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.89, 95%CI = 1.59-2.25, p < 0.001), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (HR = 2.01. 95%CI = 1.66-2.43, p < 0.001), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.59, 95%CI = 1.32-1.91, p < 0.001), and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS) (HR = 1.51, 95%CI = 1.04-2.21, p = 0.032). Subgroup analysis showed that the low PNI was still a significant prognostic factor for OS and DMFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that a low PNI was significantly correlated to poor OS, DMFS, PFS, and LRRFS in NPC. Therefore, we suggest PNI applied as an indicator for prediction of the short- and long- term survival outcomes in patients with NPC.