Comparison of 2 Ear Molding Systems for Nonsurgical Management of Newborn Auricular Deformities

Ear Molding in Children-Timing, Technique, and Follow-up: A Systematic Review

Background: Nonsurgical management of congenital ear anomalies using molding devices shows efficacy but lacks standardization of treatment protocols and outcome measures. Learning Objective: To compare ear molding techniques and identify factors related to treatment outcomes. Design Type: Systematic review of the literature (1990-2021). Methods: Studies reporting molding for congenital ear anomalies were assessed. PRISMA guidelines were used. Data extracted included: age at treatment initiation, treatment duration, correction rates, and complications. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and outcomes were compared using the Student t-test. Results: In total, 37 studies with 3,341 patients (mean patients per study, 95; range, 5-488) were included. Infants in whom treatment was initiated at 4.8 weeks (median, 3.7; range, 0.9-8.8 weeks) were treated for 5.1 weeks (median 4.7, range 2.6-7.6 weeks) with 11.0 months follow-up (median 11.4, range 1.4-21.0 months). Individualized devices (physician-customized) were used more (62.2% of studies) than commercial devices. No difference in correction (p = 0.44) or complication rates (p = 0.19) was identified between devices. Totally, 70.3% of studies reported complications and 40.5% of studies included long-term follow-up data. Conclusions: The available evidence supports initiating ear molding in the first weeks of life to be most effective, yet outcome data should be standardized in future studies to improve evidence quality.

Correction of congenital auricle deformities with ear mould: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness and safety of ear moulds for congenital auricle deformities.

METHODS

Databases including Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database (CBM) and Web of Science were systematically reviewed. Randomised controlled trials (RCT), non-randomised control trials (non-RCT), quasi-randomised control trials (quasi-RCT) and self-controlled before-after trials were also included. Data extraction was independently conducted by two authors. The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBIN-I) was used to evaluate the risk bias. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 and chi-square tests. Effective rate, adverse reaction rate and their 95%CI were calculated. Funnel plots, Begg's test as well as sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The analysis encompassed ten studies, comprising one RCT and nine self-controlled before-after trials, involving 1860 ears (1248 children). The pooled effective rate and adverse reaction rate of ear mould were 91% (95% CI: 0.87-0.94) and 9% (95%CI: 0.02-0.17), respectively. No serious adverse reactions were reported. The effective rate of ear mould intervention showed no significant difference between age at correction≤42 days group (90%, 95%CI: 0.85-0.94) and that >42 days group (93%, 95%CI: 0.83-0.99). Similarly, there was no statistical difference in the correction efficiency between duration of wearing ear mould≤30 days group (90%, 95%CI: 0.85-0.94) and that >30 days group (92%, 95%CI: 0.86-0.96). The effective rate for correcting cryptotia ear (98%, P < 0.001), cup ear (93%, P = 0.004) and prominent ear (90%, P = 0.014) was higher than that of helical rim deformity (66%).

CONCLUSIONS

In the short term, the use of ear moulds is effective and safe in correcting congenital auricle deformities. Notably, the correction efficacy for cryptotia, cup ear and prominent ear deformities surpasses that of helical rim deformities. However, further research is required to ascertain the impact of the duration of wearing on the correction of congenital auricle deformities.

Analysis of the effect and influencing factors of EarWell auricle orthosis in the treatment of congenital auricle deformity in children

OBJECTIVE

To observe the efficacy of EarWell ear orthosis in treating children with different types of ear deformities.

METHODS

We selected 80 children aged <6 weeks with ear deformities (110 ears: 15, 30, 21, 25, and 19 ears with prominent ear, lop ear, cup ear, cryptotia, and helical rim deformity, respectively). Differences in effectiveness rate, treatment time, and incidence of complications among children with different types of auricular deformities were compared. Recurrence rates at 1 and 3 months after the treatment were compared.

RESULTS

The overall success rate was 92.73 %, and the treatment effectiveness rate did not differ significantly among the children with different types of auricular malformations (P > 0.05). The correction time of the helical rim deformity was the shortest, and the correction times of the prominent and cup ears were significantly longer than those of the other groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of complications associated with helical rim deformity and lop ear was lower, and the incidence of prominent and cup ear complications was significantly higher than that in the other groups (P < 0.05). The recurrence rate in children with prominent and cup ears was higher at 1 and 3 months after correction, and children with a lop ear and cryptotia showed no recurrence at 1 and 3 months after treatment, which correlated with the correction time, incidence of complications, and recurrence rate (P < 0.05) CONCLUSION: The EarWell auricle orthosis is an effective treatment in children with auricular morphological malformations. Correction time, complication rate, and recurrence rate were related to the malformation type.

The advantages of domestic ear molding system in molding bilateral neonatal congenital auricular deformities

BACKGROUND

There are different types of ear molding devices on the market. However, due to high cost, the wide application of the ear molding is hindered, especially for children with bilateral congenital auricular deformities (CAD). This study is designed to correct the bilateral CAD with the flexible use of Chinese domestic ear molding system.

METHODS

Newborns diagnosed with bilateral CAD were recruited in our hospital from September 2020 to October 2021. For each subject, one ear wore a set of domestic ear molding system, while the contralateral ear used only matching Retractor and Antihelix Former. Medical charts were reviewed to collect data on the types of CAD, the incidence of complications, the initiation and duration of treatment, as well as the satisfaction after treatment. Treatment outcomes were graded into three levels: excellent, good, and poor, according to the improvement of auricular morphology evaluated by both doctors and parents, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 16 infants (32 ears) were treated with the Chinese domestic ear molding system, which contains 4 cases with Stahl's ear (8 ears), 5 cases with Helical rim deformity (10 ears), 3 cases with Cup ear (6 ears), 4 cases with Lop ear (8 ears). All infants accomplished the correction completely. Both parents and doctors were satisfied with the outcomes. No obvious complication was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Ear molding is an effective nonsurgical treatment for CAD. Molding with Retractor and Antihelix Former is simple and effective. Domestic ear molding system can be flexibly used in correcting bilateral CAD. With this approach, infants with bilateral CAD will benefit more in the near future.

Efficacy of Classic Ear Molding for Neonatal Ear Deformity: Case Series and Literature Review

Background: We analyzed an original case series of the classic ear-molding method and evaluated the efficacy and complication rate of the method compared to commercial ear-molding products by meta-analysis to draw conclusions on the efficacy of the classic method. Methods: From January 2019 to March 2022, we selected patients who underwent classic ear molding for newborn ear deformities at our institution and reviewed the patient age, treatment time, efficiency and complications. Additionally, the PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched, and meta-analysis (following the PRISMA guidelines) was performed. Results: In the case study, the success rate (excellent and good outcomes) of the classic ear-molding method was 92.6%. The mean age at application and mean duration of application were 5.81 ± 6.09 days and 32.13 ± 7.90 days, respectively. In the systematic review, the classic method group showed a statistically smaller success rate (proportion of 0.79) and statistically smaller complication rate (proportion of 0.05) than the commercial product group (proportion of 0.83). Conclusions: Compared with commercial products, classic ear molding has remarkable and comparable therapeutic effects on neonatal auricular deformities. Additionally, the classic ear-molding method is more suitable for infants with auricular deformities from socioeconomically vulnerable areas. Thus, the classic ear-molding method could be a better option for congenital ear anomalies than commercial ear-molding products.

Noninvasive ear molding in the correction of ear anomalies: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Ear molding has been used for the treatment of congenital external ear anomalies. The purpose of this study is to systematically review ear molding therapy and perform a meta-analysis to determine its efficacy.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The PubMed and Embase databases from January 2009 to April 2021 were searched. Individual studies were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated noninvasive ear molding for congenital ear anomalies, featured at least 50 ears, and were published in English.

RESULTS

15 studies (one RCT and 14 clinical series) with a total of 1729 children undergoing molding of 2508 ears were identified and included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of the eight studies with reported success rates as determined by clinician assessment showed an overall success rate in 87.4% of ears. Meta-analysis of the three studies with reported efficacy as assessed by laypersons showed an overall success rate of 92%. All studies reported a variety of minor skin-related complications in the ear, such as eczema, excoriation, infection, irritation, rash (allergic or nonallergic), and ulceration. Generally, complications were not reported to be serious and were noted to resolve with minimal to no intervention.

CONCLUSION

To the authors' knowledge, this study represents the largest modern systematic review and meta-analysis analyzing the efficacy of ear molding. A review of the 15 studies included suggests that ear molding is an effective and safe treatment for congenital ear anomalies with a high success rate. However, the strength of this body of evidence is reduced by a lack of comparative studies, heterogeneous patient populations, treatment protocols, and ear assessment scales.

Evolution of Anomaly-Specific Techniques in Infant Ear Molding: A Ten-Year Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Congenital ear anomalies occur in at least one-third of the population, and less than one-third of cases self-correct. Ear molding is a nonoperative alternative to surgery that spares operative morbidity and allows for significantly earlier intervention. In this retrospective study, the senior author developed a tailored approach to each specific type of ear deformity. The use of modifications to adapt standard ear molding techniques for each unique ear are described.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective, institutional review board-approved study of 246 patients who underwent ear molding by a single surgeon. The procedure reports for each case were reviewed to develop step-wise customization protocols for existing EarWellTM and InfantEarTM systems.

RESULTS

This review included 385 ears in 246 patients. Patient age at presentation ranged from less than 1 week to 22 weeks. Presenting ear deformities were subclassified into mixed (37.4%), helical rim (28.5%), prominent (10.6%), lidding/lop (9.3%), Stahl's ear (3.6%), conchal crus (3.3%), and cupping (2.8%). Two patients (0.8%) had cryptotia. Deformity subclass could not be obtained for 11 patients (4.5%). Recommended modifications to existing ear correction systems are deformity-specific: cotton tip applicator (CTA)/setting material (Stahl's ear), custom dental compound mold (lidding/lop and cupping), scaphal wire (helical rim), CTA/protrusion excision (prominent), and custom dental compound stent (conchal crus).

CONCLUSIONS

Presentation of ear anomalies is heterogenous. This ten-year experience demonstrates that the approach to ear molding should be dynamic and customized, using techniques beyond those listed in system manuals to complement each ear and to improve outcomes.

Nonsurgical Treatment for Congenital Auricular Deformities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness and safety of non-surgical correction for congenital auricular deformities (CADs) remain unclear owing to a lack of high-level evidence. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the overall success and complication rates of the non-surgical correction for CAD.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library for eligible studies. The pooled success and complication rates of non-surgical correction were estimated using a random effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed to compare the success rates between patients treated with splints and molding systems, between those younger and older than 6-weeks, and among those with different types of CADs.

RESULTS

The review yielded 14 studies. The pooled success rate of non-surgical treatment was 93% (95% CI: 88%-97%). The success rates with splints and commercialized molding systems were 94% and 92%, respectively. The success rate was higher if non-surgical correction was initiated before age 6 weeks (96% vs. 82%). Prominent ears showed a lower success rate (85%) than other types of CADs (all > 90%). The pooled complication rate was 18% (95% CI: 10%-29%). Complications, including skin wound, irritation, and rash, were mild and easily treatable.

CONCLUSION

The non-surgical correction of CADs is highly effective and safe. Splints and molding systems offer similar effectiveness. Non-surgical correction is more beneficial if applied within 6 weeks of birth. Prominent ears have a lower, but still acceptable, success rate compared to other types of CAD. We recommend the early use of non-surgical correction to achieve favorable outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Nonsurgical molding of congenital auricular deformities and analysis of the correction outcomes: A single-center, retrospective study in east China

OBJECTIVE

Our research was carried out to provide a clinical reference for the application of nonsurgical therapy in newborns with congenital auricular deformities in east China.

METHODS

A retrospective study of consecutive newborns using noninvasive ear molding was conducted in Hangzhou in east China's Zhejiang Province. The demographic and clinical information and photographs of the ear before and after treatment were taken. The diagnosis of each auricular deformity was identified, and the treatment outcome was evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 224 patients including 356 congenital ear anomalies received noninvasive ear molding. The median age of infants to initiate treatment was 39.5 days. The median treatment duration was 42.5 days. The median follow-up time was 137.0 days. The overall treatment effective rate of all infants with nonoperative ear molding was 92.1%, and mild skin irritation and ulceration occurred in 34 ear deformities (9.6%). It confirmed that the treatment efficiency was satisfactory and the complication rate was still acceptable despite the late initiation treatment of neonates in east China. Further analysis of treatment outcomes among three subgroups of infants (the ages to initiate the ear molding were respectively less than or equal to 28, 29-56, and more than 57 days) revealed that initiation treatment was significantly related to the treatment results and the earlier the initiation treatment, the higher the effective rate and the lower the complication incidence.

CONCLUSION

Our study hints that newborns in east China may have a longer period for correction. What is more, although our study affirmed a longer period for noninvasive molding, early diagnosis and treatment are still recommended to improve therapy efficiency and reduce treatment duration and complications.