1
|
Bouloubasi Z, Karayiannis D, Pafili Z, Almperti A, Nikolakopoulou K, Lakiotis G, Stylianidis G, Vougas V. Re-assessing the role of peri-operative nutritional therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing surgery: a narrative review. Nutr Res Rev 2024; 37:121-130. [PMID: 37668101 DOI: 10.1017/s0954422423000100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is the most common medical condition that requires pancreatic resection. Over the last three decades, significant improvements have been made in the conditions and procedures related to pancreatic surgery, resulting in mortality rates lower than 5%. However, it is important to note that the morbidity in pancreatic surgery remains r latively high, with a percentage range of 30-60%. Pre-operative malnutrition is considered to be an independent risk factor for post-operative complications in pancreatic surgery, such as impaired wound healing, higher infection rates, prolonged hospital stay, hospital readmission, poor prognosis, and increased morbidity and mortality. Regarding the post-operative period, it is crucial to provide the best possible management of gastrointestinal dysfunction and to handle the consequences of alterations in food digestion and nutrient absorption for those undergoing pancreatic surgery. The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN) suggests that early oral feeding should be the preferred way to initiate nourishing surgical patients as it is associated with lower rates of complications. However, there is ongoing debate about the optimal post-operative feeding approach. Several studies have shown that enteral nutrition is associated with a shorter time to recovery, superior clinical outcomes and biomarkers. On the other hand, recent data suggest that nutritional goals are better achieved with parenteral feeding, either exclusively or as a supplement. The current review highlights recommendations from existing evidence, including nutritional screening and assessment and pre/post-operative nutrition support fundamentals to improve patient outcomes. Key areas for improvement and opportunities to enhance guideline implementation are also highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoi Bouloubasi
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Zoe Pafili
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Avra Almperti
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Grigoris Lakiotis
- 2nd Department of Surgery, Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - George Stylianidis
- 2nd Department of Surgery, Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Vasilios Vougas
- 1st Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Funk Debleds P, Chambrier C, Slim K. Postoperative nutrition in the setting of enhanced recovery programmes. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:106866. [PMID: 36914532 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
Patients undergoing major surgery for gastrointestinal cancer are at high risk of developing or worsening malnutrition and sarcopenia. In malnourished patients, preoperative nutritional support may not be sufficient and so postoperative support is advised. This narrative review addresses several aspects of postoperative nutritional care in the setting of enhanced recovery programmes. Early oral feeding, therapeutic diet, oral nutritional supplements, immunonutrition, and probiotics are discussed. When postoperative intake is insufficient, nutritional support favouring the enteral route is recommended. Whether this approach should use a nasojejunal tube or jejunostomy is still a matter of debate. In the setting of enhanced recovery programmes with early discharge, nutritional follow-up and care should be continued beyond the short time in hospital. In enhanced recovery programmes, the main specific aspects of nutrition are patient education, early oral intake, and post-discharge care. The other aspects do not differ from conventional care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela Funk Debleds
- Department of Supportive Care, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Cécile Chambrier
- Intensive Clinical Nutrition Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - Karem Slim
- Department of Digestive Surgery, University Hospital, CHU, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Francophone Group for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Russell TB, Murphy P, Tanase A, Sen G, Aroori S. Results from a UK-wide survey: the nutritional assessment and management of pancreatic resection patients is highly variable. Eur J Clin Nutr 2022; 76:1038-1040. [PMID: 35027684 DOI: 10.1038/s41430-021-01063-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 11/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Most patients who undergo curative-intent resection for pancreatic cancer are malnourished. This correlates with poor outcomes. There are no guidelines for the nutritional management of these patients. We aimed to establish current UK practice by surveying all hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) units. Questions covered: dietetic service, nutrition risk screening (RS), micronutrients, prehabilitation, nutritional support, pancreatic exocrine replacement therapy (PERT), and details of follow-up. Twenty-six units (83.9%) responded. Twenty-three (88.5%) provide a specialist HPB dietetic service. Twelve (52.2%) cover the entire treatment pathway. Thirteen (50.0%) routinely perform RS, eleven (42.3%) check micronutrients, and fourteen (53.8%) provide a prehabilitation programme. Twelve units (46.2%) allow nutritional supplements within 48 h of surgery, and eight (30.8%) do not allow this until at least 72 h. The use of PERT and acid-suppressing agents is highly variable. Seventeen units (65.4%) routinely provide dietitian follow-up. Practice is highly variable; robust studies are required so consensus guidelines can be formulated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas B Russell
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Derriford Road, Plymouth, PL6 8DH, UK
| | - Paula Murphy
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Derriford Road, Plymouth, PL6 8DH, UK
| | - Andrei Tanase
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Derriford Road, Plymouth, PL6 8DH, UK
| | - Gourab Sen
- Freeman Hospital, Freeman Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, UK
| | - Somaiah Aroori
- University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Derriford Road, Plymouth, PL6 8DH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kapoor D, Barreto SG, Perwaiz A, Singh A, Chaudhary A. Can we predict the need for nutritional support following pancreatoduodenectomy? Pancreatology 2022; 22:160-167. [PMID: 34893447 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The practice of routine placement of a tube jejunostomy at the time of pancreatoduodenectomy has given way to a more selective approach. However, the indications of establishing enteral access at the time of surgery remain poorly defined. This study aimed to assess the preoperative and intraoperative factors associated with the need for nutritional support after pancreatoduodenectomy, to guide decision-making for the establishment of intraoperative feeding access. METHODS Retrospective study, analyzing the data of 562 consecutive patients, who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy between March 2013 to December 2020. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis was carried out to ascertain the factors associated with the initiation of and need for nutritional support for more than 7 days postop. The utility of tube jejunostomy was studied in patients in whom it was performed. RESULTS Of 562 patients, 105 (18.7%) needed nutritional support. A tube jejunostomy was performed in 46 (8.2%) patients, parenteral nutrition was used in 83 (14.8%), and nasojejunal tube placed in 28 (4.9%) patients. On logistic regression analysis, age, serum albumin <3.0 gm/dl and operative blood loss were independently associated with the initiation of supportive nutrition, while preoperative gastric outlet obstruction (OR 3.105, 95% CI1.201-8.032, p = 0.019) and serum albumin <3.0 gm/dl (OR 2.669, 95% CI 1.131-6.300, p = 0.025) were associated with the need for prolonged nutritional support. The maximal benefit of tube jejunostomy was in patients with mental health disorders (83.3%). CONCLUSION Tube jejunostomy for nutritional support after pancreatoduodenectomy can be considered in patients with preoperative gastric outlet obstruction, serum albumin <3.0 gm/dl and mental health disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deeksha Kapoor
- Division of GI Surgery, GI Oncology, Minimal Access and Bariatric Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta - the Medicity, Sector 38, Gurugram, Haryana, 122001, India.
| | - Savio George Barreto
- Division of Surgery & Perioperative Medicine, Flinders Medical Center, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Azhar Perwaiz
- Division of GI Surgery, GI Oncology, Minimal Access and Bariatric Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta - the Medicity, Sector 38, Gurugram, Haryana, 122001, India.
| | - Amanjeet Singh
- Division of GI Surgery, GI Oncology, Minimal Access and Bariatric Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta - the Medicity, Sector 38, Gurugram, Haryana, 122001, India.
| | - Adarsh Chaudhary
- Division of GI Surgery, GI Oncology, Minimal Access and Bariatric Surgery, Institute of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Sciences, Medanta - the Medicity, Sector 38, Gurugram, Haryana, 122001, India.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen W, Zhang Y, Qin H, Fan Z, Hu H, Chen M, Jiang C, Qian Q, Ding Z. A pilot study on prophylactic tube enterostomy for the prevention of anastomotic leakage in patients with high-risk intestinal anastomosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2021; 407:267-275. [PMID: 34549336 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02326-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anastomotic leakages (ALs) are one of the most serious complications following gastrointestinal anastomosis. Currently, very few operative measures are available for the prevention of ALs. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tube enterostomy (T-E) for the prevention of ALs in patients with high-risk intestinal anastomosis. METHODS In this retrospective study, demographic data and postoperative outcomes were compared among patients who received T-E and two historical cohorts: one group that underwent primary anastomosis without T-E (non-T-E group) and another that underwent conventional stoma construction without anastomosis (stoma group). The operative procedures were selected according to a scoring system that quantitatively evaluated risk of Als (Zhongnan score). RESULTS From March 2017 to March 2020, a total of 45 consecutive patients were enrolled in the T-E group. Among these patients, 53.3% (24/45) were diagnosed with Crohn's disease (CD), and 66.7% (30/45) of them underwent emergency surgery. After propensity score matching, the demographic data were comparable among the three groups. One case of AL (2.2%) occurred in the T-E group, while four cases of ALs (8.9%, 4/45) were found in the non-T-E group (p = 0.13). Tube feeding was provided to 33.3% (15/45) of the T-E patients. Major tube-related complications included one tube dislocation (2.2%) and 3 (6.7%) minor leakages after tube withdrawal (treated conservatively). One death occurred in the stoma group. In the subgroup analysis of CD patients, lower rates of ALs and abdominal abscesses were observed in the T-E group than in the non-T-E and stoma subgroups, but the differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS T-E seems to be a safe and feasible operative method for the protection of high-risk intestinal anastomosis, can be reversed and can provide enteral feeding with acceptable tube-related complications. Further studies are needed to validate the role of T-E.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenhao Chen
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.,Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Center of Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Intestinal & Colorectal Diseases, Quality Control Center of Colorectal Surgery, Health Commission of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China
| | - Yichao Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Haibo Qin
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhou Fan
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China
| | - Hang Hu
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.,Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Center of Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Intestinal & Colorectal Diseases, Quality Control Center of Colorectal Surgery, Health Commission of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China
| | - Min Chen
- Gastroenterology Department, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, Hubei, China
| | - Congqing Jiang
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Intestinal & Colorectal Diseases, Quality Control Center of Colorectal Surgery, Health Commission of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China
| | - Qun Qian
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.,Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Center of Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Intestinal & Colorectal Diseases, Quality Control Center of Colorectal Surgery, Health Commission of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhao Ding
- Colorectal Surgery Department, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China. .,Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Center of Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. .,Hubei Key Laboratory of Intestinal & Colorectal Diseases, Quality Control Center of Colorectal Surgery, Health Commission of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China. .,Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Department, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, Higashiguchi T, Hübner M, Klek S, Laviano A, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Martindale RG, Waitzberg D, Bischoff SC, Singer P. ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr 2021; 40:4745-4761. [PMID: 34242915 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.03.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 212] [Impact Index Per Article: 70.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Early oral feeding is the preferred mode of nutrition for surgical patients. Avoidance of any nutritional therapy bears the risk of underfeeding during the postoperative course after major surgery. Considering that malnutrition and underfeeding are risk factors for postoperative complications, early enteral feeding is especially relevant for any surgical patient at nutritional risk, especially for those undergoing upper gastrointestinal surgery. The focus of this guideline is to cover both nutritional aspects of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) concept and the special nutritional needs of patients undergoing major surgery, e.g. for cancer, and of those developing severe complications despite best perioperative care. From a metabolic and nutritional point of view, the key aspects of perioperative care include the integration of nutrition into the overall management of the patient, avoidance of long periods of preoperative fasting, re-establishment of oral feeding as early as possible after surgery, the start of nutritional therapy immediately if a nutritional risk becomes apparent, metabolic control e.g. of blood glucose, reduction of factors which exacerbate stress-related catabolism or impaired gastrointestinal function, minimized time on paralytic agents for ventilator management in the postoperative period, and early mobilization to facilitate protein synthesis and muscle function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arved Weimann
- Department of General, Visceral and Oncological Surgery, St. George Hospital, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - Marco Braga
- University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Franco Carli
- Department of Anesthesia of McGill University, School of Nutrition, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Martin Hübner
- Service de chirurgie viscérale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Stanislaw Klek
- General Surgical Oncology Clinic, National Cancer Institute, Krakow, Poland
| | - Alessandro Laviano
- Department of Translational and Precision Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Olle Ljungqvist
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Orebro University, Orebro, Sweden
| | - Dileep N Lobo
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, National Institute for Health Research Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | - Dan Waitzberg
- University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Ganep, Human Nutrition, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Stephan C Bischoff
- University of Hohenheim, Institute of Nutritional Medicine, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Pierre Singer
- Institute for Nutrition Research, Rabin Medical Center, Beilison Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Vasavada B, Patel H. Routine use of feeding jejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy: A metaanalysis. SURGICAL PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/1744-1633.12493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bhavin Vasavada
- Department of hepatobiliary surgery and liver transplant Shalby Hospitals Ahmedabad India
| | - Hardik Patel
- Department of hepatobiliary surgery and liver transplant Shalby Hospitals Ahmedabad India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Current situation, consensus and controversy of perioperative nutrition management in pancreatic surgery: A narrative review. JOURNAL OF PANCREATOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1097/jp9.0000000000000066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
|
9
|
Wobith M, Wehle L, Haberzettl D, Acikgöz A, Weimann A. Needle Catheter Jejunostomy in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreato-Biliary Cancer-Impact on Nutritional and Clinical Outcome in the Early and Late Postoperative Period. Nutrients 2020; 12:E2564. [PMID: 32854177 PMCID: PMC7551703 DOI: 10.3390/nu12092564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The metabolic risk for patients undergoing abdominal cancer resection increases in the perioperative period and malnutrition may be observed. In order to prevent further weight loss, the guidelines recommend for high-risk patients the placement of a needle catheter jejunostomy (NCJ) for supplementing enteral feeding in the early and late postoperative period. Our aim was to evaluate the safety of NCJ placement and its potential benefits regarding the nutritional status in the postoperative course. We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing surgery for upper gastrointestinal cancer, such as esophageal, gastric, and pancreato-biliary cancer, and NCJ placement during the operation. The nutritional parameters body mass index (BMI), perioperative weight loss, phase angle measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and the clinical outcome were assessed perioperatively and during follow-up visits 1 to 3 months and 4 to 6 months after surgery. In 102 patients a NCJ was placed between January 2006 and December 2016. Follow-up visits 1 to 3 months and 4 to 6 months after surgery were performed in 90 patients and 88 patients, respectively. No severe complications were seen after the NCJ placement. The supplementing enteral nutrition via NCJ did not improve the nutritional status of the patients postoperatively. There was a significant postoperative decline of weight and phase angle, especially in the first to third month after surgery, which could be stabilized until 4-6 months after surgery. Placement of NCJ is safe. In patients with upper gastrointestinal and pancreato-biliary cancer, supplementing enteral nutrition during the postoperative course and continued after discharge may attenuate unavoidable weight loss and a reduction of body cell mass within the first six months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Arved Weimann
- Clinical Nutrition Unit of the Department of General, Visceral, and Oncological Surgery, Klinikum St. Georg gGmbH Leipzig, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; (M.W.); (L.W.); (D.H.); (A.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreatoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Recommendations 2019. World J Surg 2020; 44:2056-2084. [DOI: 10.1007/s00268-020-05462-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
11
|
Impact of Intravenous Fluids and Enteral Nutrition on the Severity of Gastrointestinal Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 6:5-24. [PMID: 32104727 PMCID: PMC7029405 DOI: 10.2478/jccm-2020-0009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Gastrointestinal dysfunction (GDF) is one of the primary causes of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients. Intensive care interventions, such as intravenous fluids and enteral feeding, can exacerbate GDF. There exists a paucity of high-quality literature on the interaction between these two modalities (intravenous fluids and enteral feeding) as a combined therapy on its impact on GDF. Aim To review the impact of intravenous fluids and enteral nutrition individually on determinants of gut function and implications in clinical practice. Methods Randomized controlled trials on intravenous fluids and enteral feeding on GDF were identified by a comprehensive database search of MEDLINE and EMBASE. Extraction of data was conducted for study characteristics, provision of fluids or feeding in both groups and quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane criteria. A random-effects model was applied to estimate the impact of these interventions across the spectrum of GDF severity. Results Restricted/ goal-directed intravenous fluid therapy is likely to reduce ‘mild’ GDF such as vomiting (p = 0.03) compared to a standard/ liberal intravenous fluid regime. Enterally fed patients experienced increased episodes of vomiting (p = <0.01) but were less likely to develop an anastomotic leak (p = 0.03) and peritonitis (p = 0.03) compared to parenterally fed patients. Vomiting (p = <0.01) and anastomotic leak (p = 0.04) were significantly lower in the early enteral feeding group. Conclusions There is less emphasis on the combined approach of intravenous fluid resuscitation and enteral feeding in critically ill patients. Conservative fluid resuscitation and aggressive enteral feeding are presumably key factors contributing to severe life-threatening GDF. Future trials should evaluate the impact of cross-interaction between conservative and aggressive modes of these two interventions on the severity of GDF.
Collapse
|
12
|
Tanaka M, Heckler M, Mihaljevic AL, Probst P, Klaiber U, Heger U, Hackert T. Meta-analysis of effect of routine enteral nutrition on postoperative outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2019; 106:1138-1146. [PMID: 31241185 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2019] [Revised: 03/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal nutritional treatment after pancreatoduodenectomy is still unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the impact of routine enteral nutrition following pancreatoduodenectomy on postoperative outcomes. METHODS RCTs comparing enteral nutrition (regular oral intake with routine tube feeding) with non-enteral nutrition (regular oral intake with or without parenteral nutrition) after pancreatoduodenectomy were sought systematically in the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases. Postoperative data were extracted. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to compare postoperative outcomes in the two arms, and pooled odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) were calculated with 95 per cent confidence intervals. In subgroup analyses, the routes of nutrition were assessed. Percutaneous tube feeding and nasojejunal tube feeding were each compared with parenteral nutrition. RESULTS Eight RCTs with a total of 955 patients were included. Enteral nutrition was associated with a lower incidence of infectious complications (OR 0·66, 95 per cent c.i. 0·43 to 0·99; P = 0·046) and a shorter length of hospital stay (MD -2·89 (95 per cent c.i. -4·99 to -0·80) days; P < 0·001) than non-enteral nutrition. Percutaneous tube feeding had a lower incidence of infectious complications (OR 0·47, 0·25 to 0·87; P = 0·017) and a shorter hospital stay (MD -1·56 (-2·13 to -0·98) days; P < 0·001) than parenteral nutrition (3 RCTs), whereas nasojejunal tube feeding was not associated with better postoperative outcomes (2 RCTs). CONCLUSION As a supplement to regular oral diet, routine enteral nutrition, especially via a percutaneous enteral tube, may improve postoperative outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Tanaka
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Heckler
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A L Mihaljevic
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - P Probst
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - U Klaiber
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - U Heger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - T Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gianotti L, Besselink MG, Sandini M, Hackert T, Conlon K, Gerritsen A, Griffin O, Fingerhut A, Probst P, Abu Hilal M, Marchegiani G, Nappo G, Zerbi A, Amodio A, Perinel J, Adham M, Raimondo M, Asbun HJ, Sato A, Takaori K, Shrikhande SV, Del Chiaro M, Bockhorn M, Izbicki JR, Dervenis C, Charnley RM, Martignoni ME, Friess H, de Pretis N, Radenkovic D, Montorsi M, Sarr MG, Vollmer CM, Frulloni L, Büchler MW, Bassi C. Nutritional support and therapy in pancreatic surgery: A position paper of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 2018; 164:1035-1048. [PMID: 30029989 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2018] [Revised: 05/28/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal nutritional therapy in the field of pancreatic surgery is still debated. METHODS An international panel of recognized pancreatic surgeons and pancreatologists decided that the topic of nutritional support was of importance in pancreatic surgery. Thus, they reviewed the best contemporary literature and worked to develop a position paper to provide evidence supporting the integration of appropriate nutritional support into the overall management of patients undergoing pancreatic resection. Strength of recommendation and quality of evidence were based on the approach of the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation Working Group. RESULTS The measurement of nutritional status should be part of routine preoperative assessment because malnutrition is a recognized risk factor for surgery-related complications. In addition to patient's weight loss and body mass index, measurement of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity should be considered in the preoperative evaluation because they are strong predictors of poor short-term and long-term outcomes. The available data do not show any definitive nutritional advantages for one specific type of gastrointestinal reconstruction technique after pancreatoduodenectomy over the others. Postoperative early resumption of oral intake is safe and should be encouraged within enhanced recovery protocols, but in the case of severe postoperative complications or poor tolerance of oral food after the operation, supplementary artificial nutrition should be started at once. At present, there is not enough evidence to show the benefit of avoiding oral intake in clinically stable patients who are complicated by a clinically irrelevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (a so-called biochemical leak), while special caution should be given to feeding patients with clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula orally. When an artificial nutritional support is needed, enteral nutrition is preferred whenever possible over parenteral nutrition. After the operation, regardless of the type of pancreatic resection or technique of reconstruction, patients should be monitored carefully to assess for the presence of endocrine and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Although fecal elastase-1 is the most readily available clinical test for detection of pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, its sensitivity and specificity are low. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy should be initiated routinely after pancreatoduodenectomy and in patients with locally advanced disease and continued for at least 6 months after surgery, because untreated pancreatic exocrine insufficiency may result in severe nutritional derangement. CONCLUSION The importance of this position paper is the consensus reached on the topic. Concentrating on nutritional support and therapy is of utmost value in pancreatic surgery for both short- and long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Gianotti
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, and Department of Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy.
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marta Sandini
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, and Department of Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kevin Conlon
- Department of Surgery, Trinity College Dublin, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Arja Gerritsen
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Oonagh Griffin
- Department of Surgery, Trinity College Dublin, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Abe Fingerhut
- University of Graz Hospital, Surgical Research Unit, Graz, Austria
| | - Pascal Probst
- Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Giovanni Marchegiani
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Gennaro Nappo
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas University, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Zerbi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Humanitas University, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Amodio
- Unit of Gastroenterology, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Julie Perinel
- Department of Digestive Surgery, E. Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon-Sud Faculty of Medicine, Lyon, France
| | - Mustapha Adham
- Department of Digestive Surgery, E. Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon-Sud Faculty of Medicine, Lyon, France
| | - Massimo Raimondo
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Horacio J Asbun
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Asahi Sato
- Division of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kyoichi Takaori
- Division of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery and Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | - Marco Del Chiaro
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit - Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC) - Karolinska Institutet at Center for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Maximilian Bockhorn
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic-Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jakob R Izbicki
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic-Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christos Dervenis
- University of Cyprus and Department of Surgical Oncology and HPB Surgery Metropolitan Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Richard M Charnley
- Department of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Marc E Martignoni
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität, München, Germany
| | - Helmut Friess
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität, München, Germany
| | | | - Dejan Radenkovic
- Clinic for Digestive Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia and School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Marco Montorsi
- Department of Surgery, Humanitas University, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Michael G Sarr
- Department of Gastroenterologic and General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Charles M Vollmer
- Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Luca Frulloni
- Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claudio Bassi
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
de-Aguilar-Nascimento JE, Salomão AB, Waitzberg DL, Dock-Nascimento DB, Correa MITD, Campos ACL, Corsi PR, Portari Filho PE, Caporossi C. ACERTO guidelines of perioperative nutritional interventions in elective general surgery. Rev Col Bras Cir 2017; 44:633-648. [DOI: 10.1590/0100-69912017006003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2017] [Accepted: 07/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Objective: to present recommendations based on the ACERTO Project (Acceleration of Total Post-Operative Recovery) and supported by evidence related to perioperative nutritional care in General Surgery elective procedures. Methods: review of relevant literature from 2006 to 2016, based on a search conducted in the main databases, with the purpose of answering guiding questions previously formulated by specialists, within each theme of this guideline. We preferably used randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyzes but also selected some cohort studies. We contextualized each recommendation-guiding question to determine the quality of the evidence and the strength of this recommendation (GRADE). This material was sent to authors using an open online questionnaire. After receiving the answers, we formalized the consensus for each recommendation of this guideline. Results: the level of evidence and the degree of recommendation for each item is presented in text form, followed by a summary of the evidence found. Conclusion: this guideline reflects the recommendations of the group of specialists of the Brazilian College of Surgeons, the Brazilian Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition and the ACERTO Project for nutritional interventions in the perioperative period of Elective General Surgery. The prescription of these recommendations can accelerate the postoperative recovery of patients submitted to elective general surgery, with decrease in morbidity, length of stay and rehospitalization, and consequently, of costs.
Collapse
|
15
|
Hamilton EC, Curtin T, Slack RS, Ge C, Slade A, Hayes-Jordan A, Lally KP, Austin MT. Surgical Feeding Tubes in Pediatric and Adolescent Cancer Patients: A Single-institution Retrospective Review. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2017; 39:e342-e348. [PMID: 28678086 PMCID: PMC5610072 DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000000902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of our study was to evaluate surgical enteric access in pediatric cancer patients to determine factors associated with postoperative complications. We performed a single-institution retrospective review of all patients below 21 years old with a primary cancer diagnosis who underwent surgical procedures for enteral access between 2004 and 2014. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine independent predictors of postoperative complications. During the study period, 122 patients had surgically placed feeding tubes, of whom 58% developed ≥1 complication(s) and 16% experienced a major complication. No single factor was significantly associated with developing any complication or major complication. Several trends were noted including increased complications associated with jejunostomy tubes, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes, and abdominal radiation. Surgically placed enteric access in pediatric and adolescent cancer patients is associated with an extremely high complication rate emphasizing the importance of careful evaluation of these patients before embarking on surgical feeding access. Future work should evaluate mechanisms to decrease complications and/or explore alternative methods to provide supplemental nutrition in children and adolescents with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma C. Hamilton
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Thomas Curtin
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rebecca S. Slack
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christine Ge
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Austen Slade
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Andrea Hayes-Jordan
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kevin P. Lally
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mary T. Austin
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, Higashiguchi T, Hübner M, Klek S, Laviano A, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Martindale R, Waitzberg DL, Bischoff SC, Singer P. ESPEN guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr 2017; 36:623-650. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 960] [Impact Index Per Article: 137.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2017] [Accepted: 02/13/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
17
|
Does the Ileal Brake Contribute to Delayed Gastric Emptying After Pancreatoduodenectomy? Dig Dis Sci 2017; 62:319-335. [PMID: 27995402 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-016-4402-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2016] [Accepted: 11/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) represents a significant cause for morbidity following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). At a time when no specific and universally effective therapy exists to treat these patients, elucidating other potential (preventable or treatable) mechanisms for DGE is important. The aim of the manuscript was to test the hypothesis that ileal brake contributes to DGE in PD patients receiving jejunal tube feeding by systematically reviewing experimental and clinical literature. A series of clinically relevant questions were framed related to the potential role of the ileal brake in development of DGE post-PD and formed the basis of targeted literature searches. A comprehensive search of major reference databases from January 1980 to June 2015 was carried out which included human and animal studies. The ileal brake is a feedback loop neurally mediated by the vagus and sympatho-adrenergic pathways and hormonally by gut peptides including glucagon-like peptide-1, peptide YY (PYY), and neurotensin. The most potent stimulus for this inhibitory reflex is intra-ileal fat. There is evidence to indicate the role of an inhibitory reflex (on gastric emptying) mediated by PYY and CCK which, in turn, are stimulated by nutrient delivery into the distal small intestine providing indirect support to the role of ileal brake in post-PD DGE. The ileal brake is a likely factor contributing to DGE post-PD. While there has been no study to directly test this hypothesis, there is compelling indirect evidence to support it. Designing a trial that would answer such a question appears to be the most appropriate way forward.
Collapse
|
18
|
Liu Y, Xue X. Systematic review of peri-operative nutritional support for patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2015; 4:304-12. [PMID: 26605277 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2014.12.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malnutrition is prevalent among peri-operative patients undergoing hepatobiliary surgery and is an important prognostic factor. Both hepatobiliary disease and surgical trauma significantly affects body's metabolism and environment. Therefore, it is very important for patients with liver diseases undergoing hepatobiliary surgery to receive essential nutritional support during peri-operative period. METHODS We summarized our clinical experience and reviewed of related literature to find the way for implementing the appropriate nutritional strategy. RESULTS We found after comprehensively evaluating nutrition status, function of liver and gastrointestinal tract, nutritional strategy would be selected correctly. In severe malnutrition, initiation of enteral nutrition (EN) and/or parenteral nutrition (PN) with essential or special formulae is often recommended. Especially nasojejunal feeding is indicated that early application can improve nutritional status and liver function, reduce complications and prolong survival. CONCLUSIONS The reasonable peri-operative nutritional support therapy can improve the effect of surgical treatment and promote the patients' recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin Liu
- Intensive Care Unit, Aerospace Central Hospital, Aerospace Clinical Medical College Affiliated to Peking University, Beijing 100049, China
| | - Xiaoyan Xue
- Intensive Care Unit, Aerospace Central Hospital, Aerospace Clinical Medical College Affiliated to Peking University, Beijing 100049, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Guan QH, Chen QP, Zhang XY, Zhang F, Lu YM, Xia GH, Zhang CX, Cao XF, Ou K. Design and clinical application of a double lumen T tube. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2015; 23:5056-5063. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v23.i31.5056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To design a double lumen T tube, investigate its hydrodynamic characteristics, and assess its clinical application.
METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out to analyze the data of patients who underwent biliary tract operations with placement of a double lumen T tube from March 1989 to March 2015 at the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Binzhou Medical University Hospital. This study introduced the design, placement and operational method of the double lumen T tube, investigated its hydrodynamic characteristics, analyzed the complications, and assessed its clinical application in biliary tract irrigation, bile culture, cholangiography and enteral nutrition.
RESULTS: Based on the function of double lumen T tube, it was divided into two types: Ⅰ (for biliary irrigation) and type Ⅱ (for enteral nutrition). For type Ⅰ double lumen T tube, the short arm was placed in the extrahepatic bile duct, and the long arm was brought out through the abdominal wall; the inner tube was placed in left or right secondary or tertiary intrahepatic bile duct, with the end outside the body connected to saline for flushing. For type Ⅱ double lumen T tube, the short arm was placed in the extrahepatic bile duct, and the long arm was brought out through the abdominal wall; the inner tube was placed into the duodenum or jejunum through the duodenal papilla or anastomotic stoma, with the end outside the body connected to nutrition solution for enteral nutrition. A total of 1020 patients underwent placement of the double lumen T tube, including 660 who used type Ⅰ and 360 who used type Ⅱ tube. T tube placement time was 5-92 d, with an average value of 23.5 d. Complications included T tube dislocation (2 cases, 0.20%), lumen blockage (12 cases, 1.18%), infection around T tube (23 cases, 2.26%), hemobilia (2 cases, 0.2%), difficulty in removing (1 case, 0.10%), biliary fistula (11 cases, 1.08%), and peritonitis after T tube removal (2 cases, 0.20%). Moreover, 665 cases underwent biliary tract irrigation, and bile culture was performed in 343 cases; the positive rate of bacteria culture was lower than that observed in patients using conventional T tube. In 657 cases who underwent cholangiography, the rate of satisfaction was 98.2%. 358 cases accepted enteral nutrition with type Ⅱ double lumen T tube, and 314 cases underwent simultaneous bile external drainage and pancreatic juice reinfusion.
CONCLUSION: The double lumen T tube is easily made and convenient to use with lower complications. It can be safely used for biliary flushing, bile culture, cholangiography and enteral nutrition after biliary tract operations.
Collapse
|
20
|
Afaneh C, Gerszberg D, Slattery E, Seres DS, Chabot JA, Kluger MD. Pancreatic cancer surgery and nutrition management: a review of the current literature. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2015; 4:59-71. [PMID: 25713805 PMCID: PMC4318958 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2304-3881.2014.08.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2014] [Accepted: 08/06/2014] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Surgery remains the only curative treatment for pancreaticobiliary tumors. These patients typically present in a malnourished state. Various screening tools have been employed to help with preoperative risk stratification. Examples include the subjective global assessment (SGA), malnutrition universal screening tool (MUST), and nutritional risk index (NRI). Adequate studies have not been performed to determine if perioperative interventions, based on nutrition risk assessment, result in less morbidity and mortality. The routine use of gastric decompression with nasogastric sump tubes may be unnecessary following elective pancreatic resections. Instead, placement should be selective and employed on a case-by-case basis. A wide variety of feeding modalities are available, oral nutrition being the most effective. Artificial nutrition may be provided by temporary nasal tube (nasogastric, nasojejunal, or combined nasogastrojejunal tube) or surgically placed tube [gastrostomy (GT), jejunostomy (JT), gastrojejunostomy tubes (GJT)], and intravenously (parenteral nutrition, PN). The optimal tube for enteral feeding cannot be determined based on current data. Each is associated with a specific set of complications. Dual lumen tubes may be useful in the presence of delayed gastric emptying (DGE) as the stomach may be decompressed while feeds are delivered to the jejunum. However, all feeding tubes placed in the small intestine, except direct jejunostomies, commonly dislodge and retroflex into the stomach. Jejunostomies are associated with less frequent, but more serious complications. These include intestinal torsion and bowel necrosis. PN is associated with septic, metabolic, and access-related complications and should be the feeding strategy of last-resort. Enteral feeds are clearly preferred over parental nutrition. A sound understanding of perioperative nutrition may improve patient outcomes. Patients undergoing pancreatic cancer surgery should undergo multidisciplinary nutrition screening and intervention, and the surgical/oncological team should include nutrition professionals in managing these patients in the perioperative period.
Collapse
|
21
|
Feeding jejunostomy tube placement in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: an ongoing dilemma. J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 18:1752-9. [PMID: 24961442 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-014-2581-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2014] [Accepted: 06/17/2014] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concomitant placement of feeding jejunostomy tubes (FJT) during pancreaticoduodenectomy is common, yet there are limited data regarding catheter-specific morbidity and associated outcomes. This information is crucial to appropriately select patients for feeding tube placement and to optimize perioperative nutrition strategies. METHODS A review of all patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with FJT placement was completed. Patients were grouped by the occurrence of FJT-related morbidity. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of FJT morbidity; these complications were then further defined. Finally, associated postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS In total, 126 patients were included, of which 18 (14 %) had complications directly related to their FJT, including pericatheter infection (n = 6), pneumatosis intestinalis (n = 4), severe tube feed intolerance (n = 3), and primary catheter malfunction (n = 7). Following adjustment with logistic regression, preoperative hypoalbuminemia was identified as the only independent predictor of FJT complications (OR 2.23, p = 0.035). Patients with FJT complications were more likely to be initiated on total parenteral nutrition (TPN; 55.6 vs. 7.4 %, p -0.035) and to require TPN at discharge (16.7 vs. 0%, p = 0.003). Correspondingly, these patients resumed an oral diet later (14 vs. 8 days, p = 0.06). Both reoperation (50.0 vs. 6.5%, p < 0.001) and readmission (50.0 vs. 22.4%, p = 0.041) rates were higher among patients with FJT complications. CONCLUSIONS FJT-related morbidity is common among patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy and is associated with inferior outcomes and other performance metrics. Preoperative malnutrition appears to predict FJT complications, creating an ongoing dilemma regarding FJT placement. In the future, it will be important to better define criteria for FJT placement during pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Collapse
|