1
|
Kim EJ, Koo YR, Nam IC. Patients and Healthcare Providers' Perspectives on Patient Experience Factors and a Model of Patient-Centered Care Communication: A Systematic Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:1090. [PMID: 38891165 PMCID: PMC11172126 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12111090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2024] [Revised: 04/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Effective communication between patients and healthcare providers is essential for a positive patient experience (PE), and improving patient-centered care (PCC) involves many factors. This study aimed to (1) identify the factors that affect PE improvement, (2) reflect patients and healthcare providers' perspectives on the factors' importance, and (3) present a structural model for improving PCC. A systematic review of empirical studies that specified PE factors was conducted. Studies that did not reflect users' perspectives and non-empirical studies were excluded. The literature was searched using Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science, and the Taylor and Francis online journal. The MMAT 2018 checklist was used to assess bias in the included studies, and frequency, content, and thematic analyses were employed to synthesize the results, yielding 25 articles. The 80 PE factors identified from the analyses were categorized into six categories: Practice, Physical Needs, Psychological Needs, Social Needs, Practical Needs, and Information Needs. From a user perspective, patients emphasized professional, continuous, and comprehensive service delivery, whereas healthcare providers stressed efficient system improvements and positive provider-patient relationships. We propose a structured model for PCC improvement using a service blueprint and system map. The PCC model provides an overview of the interactions and the roles of all stakeholders regarding quality of care to improve healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun-Jeong Kim
- Department of Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea;
| | - Yoo-Ri Koo
- Department of Service Design, Graduate School of Industrial Arts, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Republic of Korea;
| | - Inn-Chul Nam
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 21431, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kenis I, Van Hecke A, Foulon V. The cocreation of care pathways for patients treated with oral anticancer drugs: From assessment data to an actual care pathway. J Eval Clin Pract 2023; 29:1354-1362. [PMID: 36949720 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE Due to the emergence of oral anticancer therapies, existing care processes in oncology - that are mainly focused on in-hospital treatments - must be rethought. The development of a care pathway is a well-known methodology to reorganise and standardise care for a specific patient group. However, care pathway development might be complex and burdensome for healthcare teams, requiring a well-thought-out methodology that provides guidance to the teams. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES In 10 Belgian oncology departments, multidisciplinary teams developed a tailored care pathway, aimed to offer high-quality patient-centred care. Each department followed a cocreation methodology, consisting of a current practice assessment, a priority setting, and the actual development of the care pathway. The aim of this study was to investigate how and to which extent underperformed evidence-based key elements (KEs), identified in the current practice assessment, guided the development of the care pathway, and how compliant the final care pathways are with the list of evidence-based KEs. METHODS A qualitative content analysis was conducted to describe and compare the results of each phase of the cocreation methodology. RESULTS This study shows that much of the evidence and feedback on current practice that was used as a starting point, got lost throughout the cocreation process. Only a limited proportion of the (seriously) underperformed KEs were prioritised by the multidisciplinary teams. Furthermore, several prioritised KEs could not be retrieved in the care pathway documents. Also, the final care pathways were not fully compliant with existing evidence. CONCLUSION Based on the findings, a more rigorous cocreation methodology seems needed, offering very concrete support for multidisciplinary teams to integrate the prioritised KEs in the care process (e.g., by using a model care pathway). Next to the selfreported performance data from healthcare professionals and patients, more objective data (e.g., walkthrough, medical records) and more extensive patient involvement should be considered in the priority setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilyse Kenis
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ann Van Hecke
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Nursing Department, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Veerle Foulon
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim EJ, Nam IC, Koo YR. Reframing Patient Experience Approaches and Methods to Achieve Patient-Centeredness in Healthcare: Scoping Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:9163. [PMID: 35954517 PMCID: PMC9367952 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
(1) There has been growing attention among healthcare researchers on new and innovative methodologies for improving patient experience. This study reviewed the approaches and methods used in current patient experience research by applying the perspective of design thinking to discuss practical methodologies for a patient-centered approach and creative problem-solving. (2) A scoping review was performed to identify research trends in healthcare. A four-stage design thinking process ("Discover", "Define", "Develop", and "Deliver") and five themes ("User focus", "Problem-framing", "Visualization", "Experimentation", and "Diversity"), characterizing the concept, were used for the analysis framework. (3) After reviewing 67 studies, the current studies show that the iterative process of divergent and convergent thinking is lacking, which is a core concept of design thinking, and it is necessary to employ an integrative methodology to actively apply collaborative, multidisciplinary, and creative attributes for a specific and tangible solution. (4) For creative problem-solving to improve patient experience, we should explore the possibilities of various solutions by an iterative process of divergent and convergent thinking. A concrete and visualized solution should be sought through active user interactions from various fields. For this, a specific methodology that allows users to collaborate by applying the integrative viewpoint of design thinking should be introduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun-Jeong Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Catholic Medical Center, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea;
| | - Inn-Chul Nam
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Incheon St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 21431, Korea
| | - Yoo-Ri Koo
- Department of Service Design, Graduate School of Industrial Arts, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bucknall T, Quinney R, Booth L, McKinney A, Subbe CP, Odell M. When patients (and families) raise the alarm: Patient and family activated rapid response as a safety strategy for hospitals. Future Healthc J 2021; 8:e609-e612. [PMID: 34888450 DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2021-0134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Patients and those close to them often have an intimate understanding of their condition and can participate in a broad range of clinical processes. During times of deterioration, their concerns might go unheard. Advocacy of family and friends can fulfil an important safety function and can support patients and healthcare professionals looking after them. If concerns by patients are not heard by the patient's primary team in hospital, patient and family activated rapid response systems allow patients and family members to alert critical care outreach teams directly. These types of systems are stipulated by regulators in Australia and in parts of the USA, and there are examples in the UK built around the 'Call for Concern' model championed by the Royal Berkshire Hospital. Implementation is not without its problems and requires a deep understanding of barriers and enablers. Empowering patients to escalate directly might help to change safety culture and have protective effects for patients and staff. Policy makers are urged to consider standardised regulation to aid implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tracey Bucknall
- Alfred Health, Melbourne Australia and director, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Burwood, Australia
| | - Rett Quinney
- Australian Catholic University, Ballarat, Australia
| | - Lisa Booth
- East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Colchester, UK
| | | | - Christian P Subbe
- Ysbyty Gwynedd, Bangor, UK, senior clinical lecturer, Bangor University, Bangor, UK and improvement science fellow, The Health Foundation, London, UK
| | - Mandy Odell
- Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Walter JK, Hill DL, Schall TE, Szymczak JE, Parikh S, DiDomenico C, Carroll KW, Nye RT, Feudtner C. An Interprofessional Team-Based Intervention to Address Barriers to Initiating Palliative Care in Pediatric Oncology: A Multiple-Method Evaluation of Feasibility, Acceptability, and Impact. J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 62:1135-1144. [PMID: 34153461 PMCID: PMC8648922 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Many children with advanced cancer are not referred to palliative care despite both professional recommendations to do so and bereaved parental preference for earlier support from sub-specialty palliative care. OBJECTIVES To assess the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of an adaptive intervention to address individual and team-level barriers to specialty palliative care referrals. METHODS A multiple-method approach assessed feasibility and acceptability among clinicians from pediatric oncology teams at a single institution. Quantitative measures of comfort with palliative care consultations, team cohesion, and team collaboration were conducted before and after the intervention. Number of palliative care consults were examined before, during, and after sessions. Intervention satisfaction surveys and qualitative interviews were conducted after the intervention. RESULTS Twenty-six team members (90% of consented) attended at least one intervention session with 20 (69%) participants completing 75% or more sessions. The intervention was modified in response to participant feedback. After the intervention, participants reported greater team cohesion, comfort discussing palliative care consultation, team collaboration, process satisfaction, and decision satisfaction. Participants agreed that the training was useful, effective, helpful, and worthwhile, that they would use the skills, and that they would recommend the training to other providers. The numbers of palliative care consults increased before intervention sessions were conducted, but did not significantly change during or after the sessions. In the interviews, participants reported overall favorably regarding the intervention with some participants reporting changes in practice. CONCLUSION An adaptive intervention to reduce barriers to initiating palliative care for pediatric oncology teams is feasible and acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Walter
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (J.K.W., D.L.H., T.E.S., S.P., C.D., K.W.C., C.F.,), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Justin Ingerman Center for Palliative Care (J.K.W., S.P., C.F.), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Douglas L Hill
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (J.K.W., D.L.H., T.E.S., S.P., C.D., K.W.C., C.F.,), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
| | - Theodore E Schall
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (J.K.W., D.L.H., T.E.S., S.P., C.D., K.W.C., C.F.,), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Julia E Szymczak
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania (J.E.S.), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shefali Parikh
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (J.K.W., D.L.H., T.E.S., S.P., C.D., K.W.C., C.F.,), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Justin Ingerman Center for Palliative Care (J.K.W., S.P., C.F.), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Connie DiDomenico
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (J.K.W., D.L.H., T.E.S., S.P., C.D., K.W.C., C.F.,), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Division of Pediatric Oncology (C.D.), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Karen W Carroll
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (J.K.W., D.L.H., T.E.S., S.P., C.D., K.W.C., C.F.,), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Russell T Nye
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (J.K.W., D.L.H., T.E.S., S.P., C.D., K.W.C., C.F.,), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Chris Feudtner
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (J.K.W., D.L.H., T.E.S., S.P., C.D., K.W.C., C.F.,), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Justin Ingerman Center for Palliative Care (J.K.W., S.P., C.F.), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gleason KT, Davidson PM, Tanner EK, Baptiste D, Rushton C, Day J, Sawyer M, Baker D, Paine L, Himmelfarb CRD, Newman-Toker DE. Defining the critical role of nurses in diagnostic error prevention: a conceptual framework and a call to action. Diagnosis (Berl) 2017. [DOI: 10.1515/dx-2017-0015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
AbstractNurses have always been involved in the diagnostic process, but there remains a pervasive view across physicians, nurses, and allied health professionals that medical diagnosis is solely a physician responsibility. There is an urgent need to adjust this view and for nurses to take part in leading efforts addressing diagnostic errors. The purpose of this article is to define a framework for nursing engagement in the diagnostic process that can serve as a catalyst for nurses to engage in eliminating preventable harms from diagnostic error. We offer a conceptual model to formalize and expand nurses’ engagement in the diagnostic process through education, maximize effectiveness of interprofessional teamwork and communication through culture change, and leverage the nursing mission to empower patients to become active members of the diagnostic team. We describe the primary barriers, including culture, education, operations, and regulations, to nurses participating as full, equal members of the diagnostic team, and illustrate our approach to addressing these barriers. Nurses already play a major role in diagnosis and increasingly take ownership of this role, removing barriers will strengthen nurses’ ability to be equal, integral diagnostic team members. This model should serve as a foundation for increasing the role of the nurse in the diagnostic process, and calling nurses to take action in leading efforts to reduce diagnostic error.
Collapse
|