The TeGenero incident and the Duff Report conclusions: a series of unfortunate events or an avoidable event?

The estimation and translation uncertainties in applying NOAEL to clinical dose escalation

The systemic exposure at the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) estimated from animals is an important criterion commonly applied to guard the safety of participants in clinical trials of investigational drugs. However, the discrepancy in toxicity profile between species is widely recognized. The objective of the work reported here was to assess, via simulation, the level of uncertainty in the NOAEL estimated from an animal species and the effectiveness of applying its associated exposure value to minimizing the toxicity risk to human. Simulations were conducted for dose escalation of an investigational new chemical entity with hypothetical exposure-response models for the dose-limiting toxicity under a variety of conditions, in terms of between-species relative sensitivity to the toxicity and the between-subject variability in the key parameters determining the sensitivity and pharmacokinetics. Results show a high uncertainty in the NOAEL estimation. Notably, even when the animal species and humans are assumed to have the same sensitivity, which may not be realistic, limiting clinical dose to the exposure at the NOAEL that has been identified in the animals carries a high risk of either causing toxicity or under-dosing, hence undermining the therapeutic potential of the drug candidate. These findings highlight the importance of understanding the mechanism of the toxicity profile and its cross-species translatability, as well as the importance of understanding the dose requirement for achieving adequate pharmacology.

Phase I Studies: Innovations and Issues

INTRODUCTION

Emeritus Editor-in-Chief, Richard Shader, published 2 editorials in 2014 to state that Clinical Therapeutics' would no longer consider simple innovator vs generic bioequivalence studies for publication and would require a rationale for the choice of agents when submitting drug-drug interaction studies for consideration. The intervening decade of developments in this field provides an opportunity to comment on these trends. Lewis Scheiner anchors the subsequent discussion in a "Learn and Confirm" super-structure of thinking about the goals of early development of pharmaceutical agents. Subsequent experience with newer agents that are focused on immunological targets has led to a shift from the simple No Observable Effect Level (NOEL) model to the Minimal Anticipated Biological Effect Level (MABEL) model for biologically focused effects to assess pre-clinical data in guiding the selection of a starting dose for First-in-Human studies.

ELEMENTS OF PHASE I STUDIES

The primary tasks of Phase I activities are to describe the pharmacokinetics (determination of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion) and essential pharmacodynamics (the dose correlation with the physiological responses, plus any untoward effects, including idiosyncratic responses) keeping in mind reporting requirements. Other Phase I activities usually conducted later in the development cycle include evaluation of drug interactions with food and other pharmaceutical agents and thorough QT studies.

INNOVATIONS

Phase I studies have been evolving in response to the unrelenting pressures to improve access and efficiencies in time, cost, and effort. Changes have been occurring in the characteristics of the participating populations, the starting dose, and shifts in the enrollment schedule to a more flexible, data-driven, adaptive design.

ISSUES

Additional issues have gained attention in the recent past, including Phase 0/microdosing, use of Phase I studies explicitly for treatment in the case of oncological products, involvement of Data Safety Monitoring Committees especially for first-in-class molecules, and improved means of optimizing selection of candidate agents for advancement to subsequent stages of development. Of final importance is the need for greater transparency of the presently inaccessible, early development study data maintained in commercial corporate legacy databases. Taken together, these developments and innovations by a broad range of stakeholders point to continuing opportunities for clinical investigators to explore the potential of Phase I studies to contribute to their own specialties.

Translating pharmacology models effectively to predict therapeutic benefit

Many in vitro and in vivo models are used in pharmacological research to evaluate the role of targeted proteins in a disease. Understanding the translational relevance and limitation of these models for analyzing the disposition, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile, mechanism, and efficacy of a drug, is essential when selecting the most appropriate model of the disease of interest and predicting clinically efficacious doses of the investigational drug. Here, we review selected animal models used in ophthalmology, infectious diseases, oncology, autoimmune diseases, and neuroscience. Each area has specific challenges around translatability and determination of an efficacious dose: new patient-specific dosing methods could help overcome these limitations.

Non-human primates in the PKPD evaluation of biologics: Needs and options to reduce, refine, and replace. A BioSafe White Paper

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) deliver great benefits to patients with chronic and/or severe diseases thanks to their strong specificity to the therapeutic target. As a result of this specificity, non-human primates (NHP) are often the only preclinical species in which therapeutic antibodies cross-react with the target. Here, we highlight the value and limitations that NHP studies bring to the design of safe and efficient early clinical trials. Indeed, data generated in NHPs are integrated with in vitro information to predict the concentration/effect relationship in human, and therefore the doses to be tested in first-in-human trials. The similarities and differences in the systems defining the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PKPD) of mAbs in NHP and human define the nature and the potential of the preclinical investigations performed in NHPs. Examples have been collated where the use of NHP was either pivotal to the design of the first-in-human trial or, inversely, led to the termination of a project prior to clinical development. The potential impact of immunogenicity on the results generated in NHPs is discussed. Strategies to optimize the use of NHPs for PKPD purposes include the addition of PD endpoints in safety assessment studies and the potential re-use of NHPs after non-terminal studies or cassette dosing several therapeutic agents of interest. Efforts are also made to reduce the use of NHPs in the industry through the use of in vitro systems, alternative in vivo models, and in silico approaches. In the case of prediction of ocular PK, the body of evidence gathered over the last two decades renders the use of NHPs obsolete. Expert perspectives, advantages, and pitfalls with these alternative approaches are shared in this review.

Automated blood sampling in canine telemetry model: Enhanced assessment of immune liabilities

INTRODUCTION

This manuscript presents a successful integration of multi-timepoint biomarker blood sampling (e.g., cytokines) in a conscious dog cardiovascular study using automated blood sampling via vascular access ports in telemetry instrumented dogs. In addition to determining plasma exposure of the test compound, the assessment of biomarkers of interest allows for more comprehensive preclinical evaluation on a traditional conscious dog cardiovascular (CV) telemetry study especially for immunology and immune-oncology molecules. This model system provides a rapid and efficient means to quickly gain understanding of potential effects on key cardiovascular parameters in large species that are commonly used for preclinical safety evaluations while collecting multiple blood samples for drug and cytokine analysis.

METHODS

Male beagle dogs were chronically implanted with telemetry devices (PhysioTel™ model D70-PCTP) and vascular access ports (SPMID-GRIDAC-5NC). BASi Culex-L automated blood sampling (ABS) (Bioanalytical Systems, Inc) system was used to collect blood samples at multiple time points for cytokine analysis. Four beagles received low-dose lipopolysaccharide solution (LPS) (0.1 and 0.5 μg/mL). The following cytokines were measured by Milliplex® map Canine Cytokine Magnetic Bead Panel: Interleukin (IL) 2, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-15, IL-18, TNF-α, MCP-1, KC-like, GM-CSF, IFN gamma, and IP10.

RESULTS

Low dose LPS administration induced a pronounced dose-dependent, transient release of key inflammatory cytokines (IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, MCP-1, and KC-like). Cytokine responses were similar to other canine and human endotoxin models. LPS administration led to an increase in body temperature, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure, as well as a decrease in QTcV interval.

CONCLUSION

Successful incorporation of cytokine analysis in telemetry instrumented dogs with vascular access ports allows for translational PK/PD modeling of both efficacy and safety of compounds in the immunology as well as the immune-oncology therapeutic areas designed to modulate the immune system. Remote collection of blood samples simultaneously with CV endpoints is a significant enhancement for assessment of biomarkers that are sensitive to animal handling and excitement associated with room disturbances which are obligatory with manual blood collection. Furthermore, implementing this approach has also refined our animal welfare procedure by reducing the handling during a study and thereby reducing stress (positive refinement 3R impact).

Generation, ex vivo expansion and safety of engineered PD1-knockout primary T cells from cynomolgus macaques

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) is a cell-surface receptor that plays a vital regulatory role in suppressing inflammatory T cell activity; therefore, it is an ideal target for T cell-redirecting therapies. Here, we describe a cynomolgus macaque model for studying the transfer of PD1-modified T cells. We developed the first T cell engager targeting the disruption of PD1 by electroporation of plasmids encoding sgRNA and Cas9. There were no significant differences between mock T cells and PD1-knockout (PD1-KO) T cells in terms of cell viability, T cell signature marker expression, cell apoptosis, or cell cycling during prolonged in vitro culture. However, in a mixed lymphocyte reaction, PD1-KO T cells exhibited increased proliferation for both CD4+ and CD8+T cells and enhanced IFNγ release. We adoptively transferred autologous PD1-KO T cells into three cynomolgus monkeys. The PD1-KO T cells did not cause overt toxicity as measured by evaluating body weight, hematological parameters, and blood chemistry parameters. Histopathological analyses of tissues showed no lesions related to the infused PD1-KO T cells. Our findings demonstrate the utility of cynomolgus monkeys in expanding PD1-KO T cells and evaluating the safety of this immunotherapy and provide a new strategy for T cell-based adoptive cell therapies.

Signal Management in Pharmacovigilance: A Review of Activities and Case Studies

PURPOSE

After nearly 12 decades of pharmaceutical catastrophes and the associated groundbreaking regulatory innovations, pharmacovigilance has come down to us in the present day as 3 interlocking core disciplines: case management, signal management, and benefit-risk management. This review provides a state-of-the-art introduction to the great variety of sources of safety information, both dependent on and independent of the Individual Case Safety Report (ICSR), and explains how this content undergoes management-system processes with globally accepted definitions, standards, and structures that make possible the ongoing safe use of a pharmaceutical product throughout its lifecycle. This occurs in the context of: (1) new products coming to market with new risks for drug-drug interactions, and (2) new global threats to safe manufacturing and distribution.

METHODS

This narrative review, reflective of the author's experience, uses a large-frame system of signal management developed by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences VIII Working Group and modified by the author to include governance. A key feature of the review is the regular inclusion of relevant case studies to provide a backdrop of the unexpected, with resulting tragic outcomes, to the ever-evolving regulatory landscape.

FINDINGS

Regarding content, beyond the commonly appreciated sources of safety information that find their way into ICSRs are non-ICSR-based sources, including preclinical data, manufacturing data, findings from subject-matter experts who participate on data-monitoring committees, outside expert panels, advocacy groups, and independent investigator studies. Regarding process, it is important to recognize that governance is crucial in the effective conduct of signal management, in that subject-matter experts are essential to the scientific and medical aspects of decision making, and business and policy executives are essential in determining the final courses of action, as these decisions have implications for the company.

IMPLICATIONS

Signal management is an integral part of pharmacovigilance practices that strive to obtain all of the information necessary for maintaining the safety profiles of a company's pharmaceutical and biological products, to support favorable benefit-risk balances, and to ensure safe use by health care providers and their patients.

Automated Real-Time Tumor Pharmacokinetic Profiling in 3D Models: A Novel Approach for Personalized Medicine

Cancer treatment often lacks individual dose adaptation, contributing to insufficient efficacy and severe side effects. Thus, personalized approaches are highly desired. Although various analytical techniques are established to determine drug levels in preclinical models, they are limited in the automated real-time acquisition of pharmacokinetic profiles. Therefore, an online UHPLC-MS/MS system for quantitation of drug concentrations within 3D tumor oral mucosa models was generated. The integration of sampling ports into the 3D tumor models and their culture inside the autosampler allowed for real-time pharmacokinetic profiling without additional sample preparation. Docetaxel quantitation was validated according to EMA guidelines. The tumor models recapitulated the morphology of head-and-neck cancer and the dose-dependent tumor reduction following docetaxel treatment. The administration of four different docetaxel concentrations resulted in comparable courses of concentration versus time curves for 96 h. In conclusion, this proof-of-concept study demonstrated the feasibility of real-time monitoring of drug levels in 3D tumor models without any sample preparation. The inclusion of patient-derived tumor cells into our models may further optimize the pharmacotherapy of cancer patients by efficiently delivering personalized data of the target tissue.

Response of safety pharmacologists to challenges arising from the rapidly evolving changes in the pharmaceutical industry

This commentary highlights and expands upon the thoughts conveyed in the lecture by Dr. Alan S. Bass, recipient of the 2017 Distinguished Service Award from the Safety Pharmacology Society, given on 27 September 2017 in Berlin, Germany. The lecture discussed the societal, scientific, technological, regulatory and economic events that dramatically impacted the pharmaceutical industry and ultimately led to significant changes in the strategic operations and practices of safety pharmacology. It focused on the emerging challenges and opportunities, and considered the lessons learned from drug failures and the influences of world events, including the financial crisis that ultimately led to a collapse of the world economies from which we are now recovering. Events such as these, which continue to today, challenge the assumptions that form the foundation of our discipline and dramatically affect the way that safety pharmacology is practiced. These include the latest scientific and technological developments contributing to the design and advancement of safe medicines. More broadly, they reflect the philosophical mission of safety pharmacology and the roles and responsibilities served by safety pharmacologists. As the discipline of Safety Pharmacology continues to evolve, develop and mature, the reader is invited to reflect on past experiences as a framework towards a vision of the future of the field.

Rationale for Combining Bispecific T Cell Activating Antibodies With Checkpoint Blockade for Cancer Therapy

T cells have been established as core effectors for cancer therapy; this has moved the focus of therapeutic endeavors to effectively enhance or restore T cell tumoricidal activity rather than directly target cancer cells. Both antibodies targeting the checkpoint inhibitory molecules programmed death receptor 1 (PD1), PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic lymphocyte activated antigen 4 (CTLA4), as well as bispecific antibodies targeting CD3 and CD19 are now part of the standard of care. In particular, antibodies to checkpoint molecules have gained broad approval in a number of solid tumor indications, such as melanoma or non-small cell lung cancer based on their unparalleled efficacy. In contrast, the efficacy of bispecific antibody-derivatives is much more limited and evidence is emerging that their activity is regulated through diverse checkpoint molecules. In either case, both types of compounds have their limitations and most patients will not benefit from them in the long run. A major aspect under investigation is the lack of baseline antigen-specific T cells in certain patient groups, which is thought to render responses to checkpoint inhibition less likely. On the other hand, bispecific antibodies are also restricted by induced T cell anergy. Based on these considerations, combination of bispecific antibody mediated on-target T cell activation and reversal of anergy bears high promise. Here, we will review current evidence for such combinatorial approaches, as well as ongoing clinical investigations in this area. We will also discuss potential evidence-driven future avenues for testing.

Revisiting CD28 Superagonist TGN1412 as Potential Therapeutic for Pediatric B Cell Leukemia: A Review

Pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) represents the most common pediatric cancer diagnosis, with numbers rising gradually every year. This paper proposes a novel therapeutic agent for pediatric ALL on the basis of a failed clinical drug trial in 2006. TGN1412 was a promising therapeutic agent that yielded outstanding results in both in vitro studies and animal trials. It is a CD28 superagonist monoclonal antibody that activates T regulatory (T_Reg) cells in the absence of costimulation of the T cell receptor (TCR) by an antigen-presenting cell. This drug was intended as a solution to T cell deficient diseases such as B cell leukemia and autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. When phase I clinical trials were conducted, all volunteers that received the drug experienced severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and faced multiple-organ failure within hours. TGN1412 was reassessed and re-entered clinical trials as a therapeutic for rheumatoid arthritis. A new assay was developed to better quantify T cell response, and volunteers in this trial experienced no pro-inflammatory cytokine release. This essay analyzes how misinformation contributed to the failure of TGN1412 in clinical trials and how revisiting this therapeutic could yield a novel treatment for pediatric B cell leukemia.

Clinical Immunotoxicology

Assessment of the potential for a test article to have adverse effects on immune function can be difficult in clinical trials due to a relative lack of useful endpoints. It is therefore common to use a weight of evidence approach with nonclinical studies to indicate if there is a cause for concern that the test article has immunotoxic potential. The most commonly used follow-up assay for immunosuppression is the T-dependent antibody response (TDAR). However, final selection of an assay (or assays) to evaluate potential human immunotoxicity depends on the type of findings in nonclinical studies. For example, signs of unintended immunostimulation or immunomodulation may be assessed using specialized assays using human cells. Other factors should also be considered, such as pharmacology of the test article, potential structural similarities with known immunomodulatory agents, and/or pharmacokinetic/drug disposition findings consistent with accumulation of test article/metabolite in immune system tissues. Although evaluation of the potential for a test article to have adverse effects on immune function can be a complex task, established nonclinical models and some clinical endpoints can be useful to determine the safety of products intended for use as human therapeutics.

Immuno-Oncology: The Third Paradigm in Early Drug Development

Clinical researchers in oncology face the difficulty of developing new drugs for treating cancer patients. This challenge nowadays extends towards new horizons since a high number of drugs are developed in each of the three paradigms: classical cytotoxics, new targeted agents, and emergent immunotherapeutic approaches. Over the last decade, there has been an unstoppable progress in this third paradigm, to the extent that in 2013 immunotherapy was granted the scientific breakthrough of the year. However, the novel mechanisms of action of these immunotherapeutic agents entail a whole new series of concepts, resulting in a number of unresolved questions to which clarification is crucial for their success: establishment of accurate preclinical models able to predict human toxicities, better selection of candidate populations, finding and validation of predictive biomarkers, definition of suitable endpoints, improvements in first-in-human study designs, proposal of more accurate radiological response criteria, management of novel immune-related toxicities and development of combinations based on a biological rationale. In this article, we review the major challenges to overcome in forthcoming years. The final role of immunotherapy in cancer will be determined by our capacity to shed some light on some of these key points.

Biomarkers for nonclinical infusion reactions in marketed biotherapeutics and considerations for study design

The observation of an infusion reaction (IR) in a nonclinical study can cause concern among investigators and regulators in the development of biotherapeutics. Biomarkers can be informative to determine whether the reactions are immune-mediated or test-article related and if there is a potential risk to human subjects. IRs encompass a broad range of adverse events with a variety of triggers; the focus of this paper is IRs due to cytokine release syndrome or immune complex formation and the associated biomarkers. Such reactions generally do not preclude clinical development or marketing approval, because it is widely accepted that immune-mediated reactions in nonclinical species are not predictive of human outcomes. Several US approved products (from 2004 to 2016) have documented IRs in nonclinical species. This review article discusses recent examples, the biomarkers evaluated, and implications for study design and conduct.

•

Approved biotherapeutics have produced nonclinical infusion reactions (IRs).

•

Nonclinical IRs after a first dose are associated with cytokine release.

•

Nonclinical IRs after several doses are associated with ADA.

•

ADA-mediated IRs may result in immune complex tissue deposition.

•

Diagnosing nonclinical IRs requires a weight-of-evidence approach using biomarkers.

Animal extrapolation in preclinical studies: An analysis of the tragic case of TGN1412

According to the received view, the transportation view, animal extrapolation consists in inductive prediction of the outcome of a mechanism in a target, based on an analogical mechanism in a model. Through an analysis of the failure of preclinical studies of TGN1412, an innovative drug, to predict the tragic consequences of its first-in-man trial in 2006, the received view is challenged by a proposed view of animal extrapolation, the chimera view. According to this view, animal extrapolation is based on a hypothesis about how human organisms work, supported by the amalgamation of results drawn from various experimental organisms, and only predicting the 'predictive grid', that is, a global framework of the effects to be expected.

Validation of Alternative In Vitro Methods to Animal Testing: Concepts, Challenges, Processes and Tools

This chapter explores the concepts, processes, tools and challenges relating to the validation of alternative methods for toxicity and safety testing. In general terms, validation is the process of assessing the appropriateness and usefulness of a tool for its intended purpose. Validation is routinely used in various contexts in science, technology, the manufacturing and services sectors. It serves to assess the fitness-for-purpose of devices, systems, software up to entire methodologies. In the area of toxicity testing, validation plays an indispensable role: "alternative approaches" are increasingly replacing animal models as predictive tools and it needs to be demonstrated that these novel methods are fit for purpose. Alternative approaches include in vitro test methods, non-testing approaches such as predictive computer models up to entire testing and assessment strategies composed of method suites, data sources and decision-aiding tools. Data generated with alternative approaches are ultimately used for decision-making on public health and the protection of the environment. It is therefore essential that the underlying methods and methodologies are thoroughly characterised, assessed and transparently documented through validation studies involving impartial actors. Importantly, validation serves as a filter to ensure that only test methods able to produce data that help to address legislative requirements (e.g. EU's REACH legislation) are accepted as official testing tools and, owing to the globalisation of markets, recognised on international level (e.g. through inclusion in OECD test guidelines). Since validation creates a credible and transparent evidence base on test methods, it provides a quality stamp, supporting companies developing and marketing alternative methods and creating considerable business opportunities. Validation of alternative methods is conducted through scientific studies assessing two key hypotheses, reliability and relevance of the test method for a given purpose. Relevance encapsulates the scientific basis of the test method, its capacity to predict adverse effects in the "target system" (i.e. human health or the environment) as well as its applicability for the intended purpose. In this chapter we focus on the validation of non-animal in vitro alternative testing methods and review the concepts, challenges, processes and tools fundamental to the validation of in vitro methods intended for hazard testing of chemicals. We explore major challenges and peculiarities of validation in this area. Based on the notion that validation per se is a scientific endeavour that needs to adhere to key scientific principles, namely objectivity and appropriate choice of methodology, we examine basic aspects of study design and management, and provide illustrations of statistical approaches to describe predictive performance of validated test methods as well as their reliability.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rilotumumab: a decade of experience in preclinical and clinical cancer research

Rilotumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody against hepatocyte growth factor, the only known ligand of the MET receptor. Over the last decade, rilotumumab has been extensively tested in preclinical studies and in clinical studies in a variety of cancer types. In this review, we examine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data that have been collected in the rilotumumab programme to date, and discuss retrospectively how the knowledge acquired in this programme can be applied to a number of key issues in oncology drug development, including: (i) using preclinical data to inform first-in-human study design; (ii) the role of biomarkers in the identification of a target patient population; (iii) the potential for drug interactions between therapeutic proteins and other anticancer agents; and (iv) pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations in phase 3 study design.

Application of population pharmacokinetics for preclinical safety and efficacy studies

From the beginning of the 1980s, population PK has been primarily used in clinical development and only in the last decade has it been convincingly applied in a preclinical setting. Sparse sampling and covariate analyses are key features of preclinical popPK, useful for toxicology and efficacy studies in animals to assemble data obtained from different studies; for describing individual PK and PD; for building mechanistic models; and for performing interspecies scaling-up of disposition and efficacy. Application in disease models, mainly in behavioral and neurological models, allows the quantitative description of PK and PD without frequent blood sampling and recurrent physiological measurements, which are the critical and compromising perturbations of experimental systems. A preclinical population approach to PK and PD, by its versatility and possibility of simulating ‘what if’ scenarios, offers a unique and potent tool in the development of new drugs, in particular biologics.

Pharmacokinetics and toxicology of therapeutic proteins: Advances and challenges

Significant progress has been made in understanding pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), as well as toxicity profiles of therapeutic proteins in animals and humans, which have been in commercial development for more than three decades. However, in the PK arena, many fundamental questions remain to be resolved. Investigative and bioanalytical tools need to be established to improve the translation of PK data from animals to humans, and from in vitro assays to in vivo readouts, which would ultimately lead to a higher success rate in drug development. In toxicology, it is known, in general, what studies are needed to safely develop therapeutic proteins, and what studies do not provide relevant information. One of the major complicating factors in nonclinical and clinical programs for therapeutic proteins is the impact of immunogenicity. In this review, we will highlight the emerging science and technology, as well as the challenges around the pharmacokinetic- and safety-related issues in drug development of mAbs and other therapeutic proteins.

TGN1412: From Discovery to Disaster

After a drug is confirmed as safe and efficacious in preclinical studies, it is tested in healthy human volunteers for first in man trials. In 2006, a phase I clinical study was conducted for a CD28 superagonist antibody TGN1412 in six human volunteers. After very first infusion of a dose 500 times smaller than that found safe in animal studies, all six human volunteers faced life-threatening conditions involving multiorgan failure for which they were moved to intensive care unit. After this particular incident, a lot was changed over how first in man trials are approved by regulatory authorities and the way clinical trials are conducted. This review primarily deals with preclinical studies conducted by TeGenero, results of which encouraged them to test the antibody on human subjects, reasons why this drug failed in human trial and aftermath of this drug trial. In addition, another drug-Fialuridine which failed in phase 2 clinical trial leading to death of five human subjects is briefly reviewed.

Do we need a special ethics for research?

Research is subject to more stringent ethical requirements than most other human activities, and a procedure that is otherwise allowed may be forbidden in research. Hence, risk-taking is more restricted in scientific research than in most non-research contexts, and privacy is better protected in scientific questionnaires than in marketing surveys. Potential arguments for this difference are scrutinized. The case in its favour appears to be weak. A stronger case can be made in favour of a difference in the opposite direction: If perilous or otherwise problematic activities have to be performed it is usually better to perform them in a research context where they are properly evaluated so that guidance is obtained for the future. However, retreating from current ethical demands on research is not a desirable direction to go. Instead, research ethics can serve to inspire the introduction of more stringent ethical principles in other social sectors.

The minimum anticipated biological effect level (MABEL) for selection of first human dose in clinical trials with monoclonal antibodies

Dose selection for first-in-human (FIH) clinical trials with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is based on specifically designed preclinical pharmacology and toxicology studies, mechanistic ex vivo/in vitro investigations with human and animal cells and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling approaches and requires a thorough understanding of the biology of the target and the relative binding and pharmacological activity of the mAb in animals and humans. These investigations provide the essential information required for the selection of a safe starting dose and escalation for FIH trials based on toxicology and pharmacology data and the minimal anticipated biological effect level (MABEL) by integrating all available in vivo and in vitro data. In this review, strategies for estimation of the MABEL for mAbs specific for both membrane and soluble targets are presented and the scientific and regulatory challenges highlighted.

Safety of biologics, lessons learnt from TGN1412

In 2006, a first-in-man phase-I clinical trial of an immunomodulatory mAb, TGN1412, ended in disaster when six healthy recipients suffered a life-threatening systemic inflammatory response, termed a 'Cytokine Storm'. A subsequent investigation concluded that these serious adverse events, not predicted by pre-clinical safety testing, were unforeseen biological effects in man. However, the adverse events had been exacerbated by administration of a near-maximum immuno-stimulatory dose to volunteers, because the calculation of a safe starting dose in man had been based upon results from pre-clinical safety testing in a non-responsive species. In hindsight, many lessons have been learnt from this experience and these have prompted a revision of the European guidelines for first-in-man phase-I clinical trials of biologics. Perhaps the most important lesson is that greater caution needs to be exercised when evaluating new biologics.

Preclinical development of monoclonal antibodies: considerations for the use of non-human primates

The development of mAbs remains high on the therapeutic agenda for the majority of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. Often, the only relevant species for preclinical safety assessment of mAbs are non-human primates (NHPs), and this raises important scientific, ethical and economic issues. To investigate evidence-based opportunities to minimize the use of NHPs, an expert working group with representatives from leading pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, contract research organizations and institutes from Europe and the USA, has shared and analyzed data on mAbs for a range of therapeutic areas. This information has been applied to hypothetical examples to recommend scientifically appropriate development pathways and study designs for a variety of potential mAbs. The addendum of ICHS6 provides a timely opportunity for the scientific and regulatory community to embrace strategies which minimize primate use and increase efficiency of mAb development.