1
|
Grevot A, Boisclair J, Guffroy M, Hall P, Pohlmeyer-Esch G, Jacobsen M, Bach U, Frisk AL, Dybdal N, Palazzi X. Toxicologic Pathology Forum Opinion Piece: Use of Virtual Control Groups in Nonclinical Toxicity Studies: The Anatomic Pathology Perspective. Toxicol Pathol 2023; 51:390-396. [PMID: 38293937 DOI: 10.1177/01926233231224805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
In the last decade, numerous initiatives have emerged worldwide to reduce the use of animals in drug development, including more recently the introduction of Virtual Control Groups (VCGs) concept for nonclinical toxicity studies. Although replacement of concurrent controls (CCs) by virtual controls (VCs) represents an exciting opportunity, there are associated challenges that will be discussed in this paper with a more specific focus on anatomic pathology. Coordinated efforts will be needed from toxicologists, clinical and anatomic pathologists, and regulators to support approaches that will facilitate a staggered implementation of VCGs in nonclinical toxicity studies. Notably, the authors believe that a validated database for VC animals will need to include histopathology (digital) slides for microscopic assessment. Ultimately, the most important step lies in the validation of the concept by performing VCG and the full control group in parallel for studies of varying duration over a reasonable timespan to confirm there are no differences in outcomes (dual study design). The authors also discuss a hybrid approach, whereby control groups comprised both concurrent and VCs to demonstrate proof-of-concept. Once confidence is established by sponsors and regulators, VCs have the potential to replace some or all CC animals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Noel Dybdal
- Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Solforosi L, Costes LMM, Tolboom JTBM, McMahan K, Anioke T, Hope D, Murdza T, Sciacca M, Bouffard E, Barrett J, Wu C, Hachmann N, Miller J, Yu J, He X, Jacob-Dolan C, Huber SKR, Dekking L, Chamanza R, Choi Y, Boer KFD, Barouch DH, Schuitemaker H, Zahn RC, Wegmann F. Booster with Ad26.COV2.S or Omicron-adapted vaccine enhanced immunity and efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron in macaques. Nat Commun 2023; 14:1944. [PMID: 37029141 PMCID: PMC10080532 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-37715-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Omicron spike (S) encoding vaccines as boosters, are a potential strategy to improve COVID-19 vaccine efficacy against Omicron. Here, macaques (mostly females) previously immunized with Ad26.COV2.S, are boosted with Ad26.COV2.S, Ad26.COV2.S.529 (encoding Omicron BA.1 S) or a 1:1 combination of both vaccines. All booster vaccinations elicit a rapid antibody titers increase against WA1/2020 and Omicron S. Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 antibody responses are most effectively boosted by vaccines including Ad26.COV2.S.529. Independent of vaccine used, mostly WA1/2020-reactive or WA1/2020-Omicron BA.1 cross-reactive B cells are detected. Ad26.COV2.S.529 containing boosters provide only slightly higher protection of the lower respiratory tract against Omicron BA.1 challenge compared with Ad26.COV2.S-only booster. Antibodies and cellular immune responses are identified as complementary correlates of protection. Overall, a booster with an Omicron-spike based vaccine provide only moderately improved immune responses and protection compared with the original Wuhan-Hu-1-spike based vaccine, which still provide robust immune responses and protection against Omicron.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lea M M Costes
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention B.V., Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Katherine McMahan
- Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tochi Anioke
- Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - David Hope
- Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Tetyana Murdza
- Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michaela Sciacca
- Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emily Bouffard
- Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Julia Barrett
- Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cindy Wu
- Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicole Hachmann
- Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jessica Miller
- Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jingyou Yu
- Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Xuan He
- Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Catherine Jacob-Dolan
- Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Ronnie Chamanza
- Non-Clinical Safety Toxicology/Pathology, Janssen Research and Development, Beerse, Belgium
| | - Ying Choi
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention B.V., Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | - Dan H Barouch
- Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Roland C Zahn
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention B.V., Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Frank Wegmann
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention B.V., Leiden, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li X, Santos R, Bernal JE, Li DD, Hargaden M, Khan NK. Biology and postnatal development of organ systems of cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). J Med Primatol 2023; 52:64-78. [PMID: 36300896 PMCID: PMC10092073 DOI: 10.1111/jmp.12622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The cynomolgus macaque has become the most used non-human primate species in nonclinical safety assessment during the past decades. METHODS This review summarizes the biological data and organ system development milestones of the cynomolgus macaque available in the literature. RESULTS The cynomolgus macaque is born precocious relative to humans in some organ systems (e.g., nervous, skeletal, respiratory, and gastrointestinal). Organ systems develop, refine, and expand at different rates after birth. In general, the respiratory, gastrointestinal, renal, and hematopoietic systems mature at approximately 3 years of age. The female reproductive, cardiovascular and hepatobiliary systems mature at approximately 4 years of age. The central nervous, skeletal, immune, male reproductive, and endocrine systems complete their development at approximately 5 to 9 years of age. CONCLUSIONS The cynomolgus macaque has no meaningful developmental differences in critical organ systems between 2 and 3 years of age for use in nonclinical safety assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiantang Li
- Drug Safety Research & Development and Comparative MedicinePfizer, IncGrotonConnecticutUSA
| | - Rosemary Santos
- Drug Safety Research & Development and Comparative MedicinePfizer, IncGrotonConnecticutUSA
| | - Jan E. Bernal
- Drug Safety Research & Development and Comparative MedicinePfizer, IncGrotonConnecticutUSA
| | - Dingzhou D. Li
- Early Clinical DevelopmentPfizer, IncGrotonConnecticutUSA
| | - Maureen Hargaden
- Drug Safety Research & Development and Comparative MedicinePfizer, IncGrotonConnecticutUSA
| | - Nasir K. Khan
- Drug Safety Research & Development and Comparative MedicinePfizer, IncGrotonConnecticutUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chamanza R, Amuzie CJ, Chilton J, Engelhardt JA. Special Issue on the Pathobiology of Laboratory Nonhuman Primates: A Review of Species, Substrain, Geographical Origin, Age, and Modality-Related Factors. Toxicol Pathol 2022; 50:548-551. [PMID: 35768952 DOI: 10.1177/01926233221106695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Nonhuman primates (NHPs) are utilized in nonclinical safety testing due to their phylogenetic proximity to humans and similarity in physiology and anatomy. However, ethical considerations and the increased demand for NHPs, coupled with the current shortage in their supply, have increased the calls to minimize their use. In addition, the increased demand and supply shortage of NHPs have increased the use of animals sourced from different geographical origins, and animals of different ages, which can complicate the interpretation of study results. Coupled with the relative uniqueness of findings induced by novel therapeutic modalities, there is an increasing need for a deeper understanding of the systemic pathobiology of NHPs. Here we provide a brief preview of the two main themes discussed in this special issue, which include the influence of geographical origin, age, and sex on background pathology, clinical pathology reference values, other relevant toxicology endpoints, and organ system pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronnie Chamanza
- Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, High Wycombe, UK
| | - Chidozie J Amuzie
- Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson, Spring House, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brayton CF. Laboratory Codes in Nomenclature and Scientific Communication (Advancing Organism Nomenclature in Scientific Communication to Improve Research Reporting and Reproducibility). ILAR J 2021; 62:295-309. [PMID: 36528817 DOI: 10.1093/ilar/ilac016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Laboratory registration codes, also known as laboratory codes or lab codes, are a key element in standardized laboratory animal and genetic nomenclature. As such they are critical to accurate scientific communication and to research reproducibility and integrity. The original committee on Mouse Genetic Nomenclature published nomenclature conventions for mice genetics in 1940, and then conventions for inbred strains in 1952. Unique designations were needed, and have been in use since the 1950s, for the sources of animals and substrains, for the laboratories that identified new alleles or mutations, and then for developers of transgenes and induced mutations. Current laboratory codes are typically a 2- to 4-letter acronym for an institution or an investigator. Unique codes are assigned from the International Laboratory Code Registry, which was developed and is maintained by ILAR in the National Academies (National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine and previously National Academy of Sciences). As a resource for the global research community, the registry has been online since 1997. Since 2003 mouse and rat genetic and strain nomenclature rules have been reviewed and updated annually as a joint effort of the International Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice and the Rat Genome and Nomenclature Committee. The current nomenclature conventions (particularly conventions for non-inbred animals) are applicable beyond rodents, although not widely adopted. Ongoing recognition, since at least the 1930s, of the research relevance of genetic backgrounds and origins of animals, and of spontaneous and induced genetic variants speaks to the need for broader application of standardized nomenclature for animals in research, particularly given the increasing numbers and complexities of genetically modified swine, nonhuman primates, fish, and other species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cory F Brayton
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|