[French national standard for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of upper aero-digestive tract - General principles of treatment]

OBJECTIVES

The management of upper aerodigestive tract cancers is a complex specialty. It is essential to provide an update to establish optimal care. At the initiative of the INCa and under the auspices of the SFORL, the scientific committee, led by Professor Béatrix Barry, Dr. Gilles Dolivet, and Dr. Dominique De Raucourt, decided to develop a reference framework aimed at defining, in a scientific and consensus-based manner, the general principles of treatment for upper aerodigestive tract cancers applicable to all sub-locations.

METHODOLOGY

To develop this framework, a multidisciplinary team of practitioners was formed. A systematic analysis of the literature was conducted to produce recommendations classified by grades, in accordance with the standards of the French National Authority for Health (HAS).

RESULTS

The grading of recommendations according to HAS standards has allowed the establishment of a reference for patient care based on several criteria. In this framework, patients benefit from differentiated care based on prognostic factors they present (age, comorbidities, TNM status, HPV status, etc.), conditions of implementation, and quality criteria for indicated surgery (operability, resectability, margin quality, mutilation, salvage surgery), as well as quality criteria for radiotherapy (target volume, implementation time, etc.). The role of medical and postoperative treatments was also evaluated based on specific criteria. Finally, supportive care must be organized from the beginning and throughout the patients' care journey.

CONCLUSION

All collected data have led to the development of a comprehensive framework aimed at harmonizing practices nationally, facilitating decision-making in multidisciplinary consultation meetings, promoting equality in practices, and providing a state-of-the-art and reference practices for assessing the quality of care. This new framework is intended to be updated every 5 years to best reflect the latest advances in the field.

Occult Metastases During Salvage Oral Cavity and Oropharyngeal Free Flaps: Oncologic Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To define rates of occult metastases in salvage oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer resection requiring free flap, to examine the location of occult metastases, and to determine associations between occult metastasis and survival.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two tertiary care referral centers.

METHODS

We identified previous cases of irradiation with recurrent or second primary oral cavity or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma that had no evidence of regional metastasis and required free tissue transfer reconstruction of the primary site. Patients who underwent elective neck dissection or exploration were reviewed. The main outcome measures were the presence and location of occult nodal metastasis. Disease-free survival and overall survival were measured. Odds ratios and hazard ratios were used for analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients were included: 52 with oral cavity primary tumors and 31 with oropharynx. An overall 78 (94%) underwent elective salvage neck dissection. Occult metastases were found in 9 (11.5%) patients. The most common nodal station for occult metastasis was level 2. Neither elective neck dissection nor the presence of occult metastasis was significantly associated with regional disease-free or overall survival. Oropharyngeal primary tumors were associated with higher risk of occult metastasis (odds ratio, 1.38; P < .01) and worse overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.09; P = .01).

CONCLUSION

There is a low incidence of occult metastasis in postradiated recurrent or second primary oral cavity and oropharyngeal tumors. Elective neck dissection and occult nodal metastases were not associated with regional or overall survival. This series may help surgeons make decisions regarding the extent of neck surgery after prior radiation, especially when free flap reconstruction is required.

Safety of the "incidental" neck dissection or exploration during free tissue transfer after head and neck irradiation

IMPORTANCE

Patients with either local recurrence of head and neck cancer or osteoradionecrosis after prior radiation treatment often require free tissue transfer for optimal reconstruction. In this setting, neck exploration for vessels is necessary, and an "incidental" neck dissection is often accomplished despite clinically negative cervical lymph nodes. While neck surgery in the post-radiated setting is technically challenging, the safety of post-radiated elective neck dissection or neck exploration for vessels is not well-studied, especially for patients undergoing non-laryngectomy salvage resections.

OBJECTIVE

To define intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications for patients undergoing elective neck dissection or exploration with free tissue transfer reconstruction in the post-radiated setting, with attention to complications from neck surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study. Patient charts from May 2005 to April 2020 were reviewed.

SETTING

Tertiary care referral center.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients underwent free tissue transfer after prior head and neck irradiation for non-laryngeal local cancer recurrence or second primary, osteoradionecrosis, or for sole reconstructive purposes. Patients with clinically positive neck disease were excluded.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Intraoperative and postoperative complications including unplanned vessel or nerve injury, hematoma, chyle leak, wound dehiscence, wound infection, fistula formation, flap failure, and perioperative medical complications. Neck exploration and neck dissection patient outcomes were compared by Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

Seventy-two patients (56 men and 16 women) of average age sixty-one (range 34-89) were identified with average follow-up 25.7 months. Most patients (78%) underwent salvage neck dissection, and the rest underwent neck exploration for vessels only. There were five intraoperative neck complications: three vessel injuries and two nerve injuries. There were twenty-six postoperative surgical complications among eighteen patients. There was no difference in surgical complications whether patients underwent neck dissection or exploration only. Two partial and two complete flap failures occurred. There were nine perioperative medical complications among six patients.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Elective neck dissection or exploration among patients undergoing free tissue transfer in the post-radiated setting carries a risk of both intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications. The present study defines risk of complications and helps to inform patient discussions for risk of complications in the post-radiated setting.

Salvage Surgery for Recurrent Tongue Cancer With Contralateral Neck Metastasis

PURPOSE

Treatment recommendations have been widely reported for primary tongue squamous cell carcinoma (TSCC) with contralateral neck metastases (CNMs), but little is known concerning recurrent TSCCs with CNMs, especially in patients who have undergone ipsilateral neck dissection. The aim of this study was to estimate overall survival (OS) and to identify prognostic factors associated with OS in patients treated for recurrent TSCCs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent salvage surgery (SS) for recurrent TSCC in our institution between January 2010 and December 2014. Before SS, all patients had been surgically treated for primary TSCC with ipsilateral neck dissection. The primary outcome variable was OS, and the patients were grouped by the primary predictor variable of CNM status for comparison. Other heterogeneous variables of interest included demographics, medical histories, clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical data, and adjuvant treatment modalities. In addition, the midline involvement and anatomic subsites of local recurrences were evaluated. Univariate log-rank and Cox regression tests were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

The study sample included 177 subjects with a mean age of 55.4 years, and 44.6% were males. The median OS was 18 months. Within the entire cohort, the incidence of CNM was 23.7% (n = 42), with an inclination (n = 30) for contralateral level I or II. Factors associated with improved survival included CNM (hazard ratio [HR], 2.108; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.341 to 3.315; P = .001), disease-free interval (HR, 0.601; 95% CI, 0.387 to 0.934; P = .023), and local recurrence subsite score (HR, 3.276; 95% CI, 0.924 to 11.623; P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with both recurrent TSCCs and CNMs had a dismal prognosis (OS rate, 16.2%) compared with those without CNMs (OS rate, 52.7%). SS for TSCC patients with collateral failures should be used cautiously because of the very unfavorable outcomes.

Meta-analysis of risk of occult lymph node metastasis in the irradiated, clinically N0 neck

BACKGROUND

Recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) after radiation is associated with poor survival, and management of the clinically negative (N0) neck during salvage surgery is controversial.

METHODS

Studies were selected according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria were patients with HNSCC, prior radiation to the lateral neck nodal basin, undergoing salvage surgery for local recurrence, persistence or second primary, and N0 at time of salvage. Eleven studies with a total of 382 patients met inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

The rate of occult metastasis was 15.4%. The pooled rate of occult nodal metastasis was 16.2% for oral cavity, 12.9% for oropharynx, 23.7% for hypopharynx, and 27.3% for supraglottic or transglottic tumors. There was a significantly higher relative risk of occult metastasis for locally advanced tumors.

CONCLUSION

Elective neck dissection at time of salvage surgery should be considered based on subsite, T classification, and prior history of nodal metastasis.

Management of the irradiated N0-neck during salvage pharyngo-laryngeal surgery

BACKGROUND

Salvage surgeries are challenging procedures, with an associated poor prognosis. Management of the N0 neck in those situations remains controversial. We aim to compare oncologic outcomes regarding neck management after surgery for N0 pharyngo-laryngeal carcinoma occurring after loco-regional radiotherapy.

METHODS

We conducted a multicentric retrospective study, including all patients undergoing surgery for persistent, recurrent or new primary N0 carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx between 2005 and 2015, following loco-regional radiotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 239 patients were included, concerning respectively 44%, 34% and 22% oropharyngeal, laryngeal and hypopharyngeal tumors operated. A neck dissection was performed in 143 patients (60%), with an occult nodal metastasis rate of 9%. This rate was higher for hypopharyngeal carcinomas (18%, p = 0.16) and tumors with initial nodal involvement (16%, p = 0.05). With a median follow-up of 60 months, the median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival rates (PFS) were 34 months and 25 months. We identified negative margin excision status, age at the time of surgery (under 60) and delay between RT and surgery over 2 years as the only variables associated with better OS (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.004) and PFS (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.010) in multivariable analysis, with no difference regarding neck management. Regional progression (alone or with distant metastasis) was noted in 10 cases: 4 in the neck observation group (4%) versus 6 in the neck dissection group (4%).

CONCLUSION

Elective lymph node dissection of irradiated neck should not be routinely performed in patients undergoing surgery for persistent, recurrent or new primary pharyngo-laryngeal carcinomas.

Elective neck dissection during salvage surgery after radiotherapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

SUMMARY

Elective neck dissection in patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) without evidence of neck disease (crN0) is poorly defined. A retrospective review was carried out on 165 crN0 patients treated with salvage surgery and elective neck dissection. Multivariate Cox analysis and recursive partitioning analysis were used to evaluate prognostic factors. The frequency of occult neck node metastases in the neck dissection (rpN+) was 16.4%. The risk of occult metastases for glottic rpT1-T2 recurrences was 5.9%, for glottic rpT3-T4 recurrences 13.2%, for non-glottic rpT1-T2 recurrences 16.1% and for locally advanced (rpT3-T4) non-glottic recurrences 31.1%. Patients with occult neck node metastases (rpN+) had a 5-year adjusted survival rate of 38.1%, while patients without nodal disease (rpN0) had a 5-year adjusted survival rate of 71.1% (p = 0.0001). Elective neck dissection can be omitted in crN0 patients with rT1-T2 glottic recurrence. We consider it advisable to perform elective neck dissection in all other situations.