1
|
Derieppe A, Gendre A, Bourget-Aguilar K, Bordure P, Michel G. Comparative study of vestibular function preservation in manual versus robotic-assisted cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int 2024; 25:23-27. [PMID: 37985652 DOI: 10.1080/14670100.2023.2271221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare vestibular outcomes in cochlear implant (CI) surgery, between robotic-assisted insertion of the electrodes versus manual insertion. METHODS We performed a monocentric retrospective study. From March 2021, the robotic system RobOtol© was used for all CI cases. We compared this robotic-assisted insertion group with a manual insertion group of patients who received a CI between July 2020 and March 2021. Primary objective was vestibular outcome. We used objective vestibular function tests: caloric testing, Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (VEMP), and Video Head Impulse Test (VHIT). Secondary objectives were postoperative complications including patient-reported postoperative vertigo. RESULTS We found no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of caloric testing, VEMP or VHIT outcomes. In patient-reported outcomes, there was significantly more vertigo in the manual insertion group compared with robotic-assisted insertion. CONCLUSION It is hypothesized that a non-traumatic insertion would cause less vestibular dysfunction postoperatively. Larger prospective studies are required to determine whether robotic-assisted CI insertion has a significant impact on vestibular outcomes in CI surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Derieppe
- Service d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et chirurgie cervico-faciale, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Adrien Gendre
- Service d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et chirurgie cervico-faciale, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
- National Hearing Implant and Viani Research Center, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Kinnie Bourget-Aguilar
- Service d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et chirurgie cervico-faciale, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Philippe Bordure
- Service d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et chirurgie cervico-faciale, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Guillaume Michel
- Service d'Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie et chirurgie cervico-faciale, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Robotized Cochlear Implantation under Fluoroscopy: A Preliminary Series. J Clin Med 2022; 12:jcm12010211. [PMID: 36615012 PMCID: PMC9820833 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12010211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
It is known that visual feedback by fluoroscopy can detect electrode array (EA) misrouting within the cochlea while robotized EA-insertion (rob-EAI) permits atraumatic cochlear implantation. We report here our unique experience of both fluoroscopy feedback and rob-EAI in cochlear implant surgery. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of consecutive patients implanted from November 2021−October 2022 using rob-EAI, with the RobOtol®, to determine the quality of EA-insertion and the additional time required. Twenty-three patients (10 females, 61+/−19 yo) were tentatively implanted using robot assistance, with a rob-EAI speed < 1 mm/s. Only three cases required a successful revised insertion by hand. Under fluoroscopy (n = 11), it was possible to achieve a remote rob-EAI (n = 8), as the surgeon was outside the operative room, behind an anti-radiation screen. No scala translocation occurred. The additional operative time due to robot use was 18+/−7 min with about 4 min more for remote rob-EAI. Basal cochlear turn fibrosis precluded rob-EAI. In conclusion, Rob-EAI can be performed in almost all cases with a low risk of scala translocation, except in the case of partial cochlear obstruction such as fibrosis. Fluoroscopy also permits remote rob-EAI.
Collapse
|
3
|
Claussen AD, Shibata SB, Kaufmann CR, Henslee A, Hansen MR. Comparative Analysis of Robotics-Assisted and Manual Insertions of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:1155-1161. [PMID: 36201552 PMCID: PMC10962863 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
HYPOTHESIS Robotics-assisted cochlear implant (CI) insertions will result in reduced intracochlear trauma when compared with manual, across multiple users. BACKGROUND Whether intracochlear trauma and translocations are two factors that may contribute to significant variability in CI outcomes remains to be seen. To address this issue, we have developed a robotics-assisted insertion system designed to aid the surgeon in inserting electrode arrays with consistent speeds and reduced variability. This study evaluated the effect of robotics-assisted insertions on the intracochlear trauma as compared with manual insertions in cadaveric cochleae in a simulated operative environment. METHODS Twelve neurotologists performed bilateral electrode insertions into cochleae of full cadaveric heads using both the robotics-assisted system and manual hand insertion. Lateral wall electrodes from three different manufacturers (n = 24) were used and randomized between surgeons. Insertion angle of the electrode and trauma scoring were evaluated using high-resolution three-dimensional x-ray microscopy and compared between robotics-assisted and manual insertions. RESULTS Three-dimensional x-ray microscopy provided excellent resolution to characterize the in situ trauma and insertion angle. Robotics-assisted insertions significantly decreased insertional intracochlear trauma as measured by reduced trauma scores compared with manual insertions (average: 1.3 versus 2.2, device versus manual, respectively; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between insertion angles observed for manual and robotics-assisted techniques (311 ± 131° versus 307 ± 96°, device versus manual, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Robotics-assisted insertion systems enable standardized electrode insertions across individual surgeons and experience levels. Clinical trials are necessary to investigate whether insertion techniques that reduce insertional variability and the likelihood of intracochlear trauma also improve CI auditory outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Seiji B Shibata
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
A Web-Based Automated Image Processing Research Platform for Cochlear Implantation-Related Studies. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11226640. [PMID: 36431117 PMCID: PMC9699139 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11226640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The robust delineation of the cochlea and its inner structures combined with the detection of the electrode of a cochlear implant within these structures is essential for envisaging a safer, more individualized, routine image-guided cochlear implant therapy. We present Nautilus-a web-based research platform for automated pre- and post-implantation cochlear analysis. Nautilus delineates cochlear structures from pre-operative clinical CT images by combining deep learning and Bayesian inference approaches. It enables the extraction of electrode locations from a post-operative CT image using convolutional neural networks and geometrical inference. By fusing pre- and post-operative images, Nautilus is able to provide a set of personalized pre- and post-operative metrics that can serve the exploration of clinically relevant questions in cochlear implantation therapy. In addition, Nautilus embeds a self-assessment module providing a confidence rating on the outputs of its pipeline. We present a detailed accuracy and robustness analyses of the tool on a carefully designed dataset. The results of these analyses provide legitimate grounds for envisaging the implementation of image-guided cochlear implant practices into routine clinical workflows.
Collapse
|
5
|
The effect of the surgical approach and cochlear implant electrode on the structural integrity of the cochlea in human temporal bones. Sci Rep 2022; 12:17068. [PMID: 36224234 PMCID: PMC9556579 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21399-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CI) restore hearing of severely hearing-impaired patients. Although this auditory prosthesis is widely considered to be very successful, structural cochlear trauma during cochlear implantation is an important problem, reductions of which could help to improve hearing outcomes and to broaden selection criteria. The surgical approach in cochlear implantation, i.e. round window (RW) or cochleostomy (CO), and type of electrode-array, perimodiolar (PM) or lateral wall (LW), are variables that might influence the probability of severe trauma. We investigated the effect of these two variables on scalar translocation (STL), a specific type of severe trauma. Thirty-two fresh frozen human cadaveric ears were evenly distributed over four groups receiving either RW or CO approach, and either LW or PM array. Conventional radiological multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) was compared with a reconstruction method that uncoils the spiral shape of the cochlea (UCR). Histological analysis showed that RW with PM array had STL rate of 87% (7/8), CO approach with LW array 75% (6/8), RW approach with LW array 50% (4/8) and CO approach with PM array 29% (2/7). STL assessment using UCR showed a higher inter-observer and histological agreement (91 and 94% respectively), than that using MPR (69 and 74% respectively). In particular, LW array positions were difficult to assess with MPR. In conclusion, the interaction between surgical approach and type of array should be preoperatively considered in cochlear implant surgery. UCR technique is advised for radiological assessment of CI positions, and in general it might be useful for pathologies involving the inner ear or other complex shaped bony tubular structures.
Collapse
|
6
|
Current Concepts and Future Trends in Increasing the Benefits of Cochlear Implantation: A Narrative Review. Medicina (B Aires) 2022; 58:medicina58060747. [PMID: 35744010 PMCID: PMC9229893 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58060747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Hearing loss is the most common neurosensory disorder, and with the constant increase in etiological factors, combined with early detection protocols, numbers will continue to rise. Cochlear implantation has become the gold standard for patients with severe hearing loss, and interest has shifted from implantation principles to the preservation of residual hearing following the procedure itself. As the audiological criteria for cochlear implant eligibility have expanded to include patients with good residual hearing, more attention is focused on complementary development of otoprotective agents, electrode design, and surgical approaches. The focus of this review is current aspects of preserving residual hearing through a summary of recent trends regarding surgical and pharmacological fundamentals. Subsequently, the assessment of new pharmacological options, novel bioactive molecules (neurotrophins, growth factors, etc.), nanoparticles, stem cells, and gene therapy are discussed.
Collapse
|
7
|
Van de Heyning P, Roland P, Lassaletta L, Agrawal S, Atlas M, Baumgartner WD, Brown K, Caversaccio M, Dazert S, Gstoettner W, Hagen R, Hagr A, Jablonski GE, Kameswaran M, Kuzovkov V, Leinung M, Li Y, Loth A, Magele A, Mlynski R, Mueller J, Parnes L, Radeloff A, Raine C, Rajan G, Schmutzhard J, Skarzynski H, Skarzynski PH, Sprinzl G, Staecker H, Stöver T, Tavora-Viera D, Topsakal V, Usami SI, Van Rompaey V, Weiss NM, Wimmer W, Zernotti M, Gavilan J. Suitable Electrode Choice for Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review of Manual Electrode Insertion Adverse Events. Front Surg 2022; 9:823219. [PMID: 35402479 PMCID: PMC8987358 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.823219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective The cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion process is a key step in CI surgery. One of the aims of advances in robotic-assisted CI surgery (RACIS) is to realize better cochlear structure preservation and to precisely control insertion. The aim of this literature review is to gain insight into electrode selection for RACIS by acquiring a thorough knowledge of electrode insertion and related complications from classic CI surgery involving a manual electrode insertion process. Methods A systematic electronic search of the literature was carried out using PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and Web of Science to find relevant literature on electrode tip fold over (ETFO), electrode scalar deviation (ESD), and electrode migration (EM) from both pre-shaped and straight electrode types. Results A total of 82 studies that include 8,603 ears implanted with a CI, i.e., pre-shaped (4,869) and straight electrodes (3,734), were evaluated. The rate of ETFO (25 studies, 2,335 ears), ESD (39 studies, 3,073 ears), and EM (18 studies, 3,195 ears) was determined. An incidence rate (±95% CI) of 5.38% (4.4–6.6%) of ETFO, 28.6% (26.6–30.6%) of ESD, and 0.53% (0.2–1.1%) of EM is associated with pre-shaped electrodes, whereas with straight electrodes it was 0.51% (0.1–1.3%), 11% (9.2–13.0%), and 3.2% (2.5–3.95%), respectively. The differences between the pre-shaped and straight electrode types are highly significant (p < 0.001). Laboratory experiments show evidence that robotic insertions of electrodes are less traumatic than manual insertions. The influence of round window (RW) vs. cochleostomy (Coch) was not assessed. Conclusion Considering the current electrode designs available and the reported incidence of insertion complications, the use of straight electrodes in RACIS and conventional CI surgery (and manual insertion) appears to be less traumatic to intracochlear structures compared with pre-shaped electrodes. However, EM of straight electrodes should be anticipated. RACIS has the potential to reduce these complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- *Correspondence: Paul Van de Heyning
| | - Peter Roland
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Luis Lassaletta
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| | - Sumit Agrawal
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Marcus Atlas
- Ear Sciences Institute Australia, Lions Hearing Clinic, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | - Kevin Brown
- UNC Ear and Hearing Center at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Marco Caversaccio
- Department for ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Dazert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Rudolf Hagen
- Würzburg ENT University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Abdulrahman Hagr
- King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center, King Saud University Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Greg Eigner Jablonski
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Vladislav Kuzovkov
- St. Petersburg ENT and Speech Research Institute, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Martin Leinung
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Yongxin Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (Capital Medical University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
| | - Andreas Loth
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Astrid Magele
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, University Clinic St. Poelten, Karl Landsteiner Private University, St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Robert Mlynski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, “Otto Körner” Rostock University Medical Center, Rostock, Germany
| | - Joachim Mueller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen, Munchen, Germany
| | - Lorne Parnes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Andreas Radeloff
- Division of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Oldenburg, Research Center of Neurosensory Sciences, University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Chris Raine
- Bradford Royal Infirmary Yorkshire Auditory Implant Center, Bradford, United Kingdom
| | - Gunesh Rajan
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Medical Sciences Department of Health Sciences and Medicine. University of Lucerne, Luzern, Switzerland. Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Medical School University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Joachim Schmutzhard
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Henryk Skarzynski
- Department of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center of the Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Piotr H. Skarzynski
- Department of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center of the Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Georg Sprinzl
- Ear, Nose and Throat Department, University Clinic St. Poelten, Karl Landsteiner Private University, St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Hinrich Staecker
- Kansas University Center for Hearing and Balance Disorders, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Timo Stöver
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Vedat Topsakal
- Department of ENT HNS, University Hospital Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Shin-Ichi Usami
- Department of Hearing Implant Sciences, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Nagano, Japan
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Nora M. Weiss
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, St. Elisabeth University Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Wilhelm Wimmer
- Department for ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Mario Zernotti
- Catholic University of Córdoba and National University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Javier Gavilan
- Hospital Universitario La Paz, Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Partouche E, Adenis V, Gnansia D, Stahl P, Edeline JM. Increased Threshold and Reduced Firing Rate of Auditory Cortex Neurons after Cochlear Implant Insertion. Brain Sci 2022; 12:brainsci12020205. [PMID: 35203968 PMCID: PMC8870646 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12020205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
The cochlear implant (CI) is the most successful neuroprosthesis allowing thousands of patients with profound hearing loss to recover speech understanding. Recently, cochlear implants have been proposed to subjects with residual hearing and, in these cases, shorter CIs were implanted. To be successful, it is crucial to preserve the patient’s remaining hearing abilities after the implantation. Here, we quantified the effects of CI insertion on the responses of auditory cortex neurons in anesthetized guinea pigs. The responses of auditory cortex neurons were determined before and after the insertion of a 300 µm diameter CI (six stimulating electrodes, length 6 mm). Immediately after CI insertion there was a 5 to 15 dB increase in the threshold for cortical neurons from the middle to the high frequencies, accompanied by a decrease in the evoked firing rate. Analyzing the characteristic frequency (CF) values revealed that in large number of cases, the CFs obtained after insertion were lower than before. These effects were not detected in the control animals. These results indicate that there is a small but immediate cortical hearing loss after CI insertion, even with short length CIs. Therefore, efforts should be made to minimize the damages during CI insertion to preserve the cortical responses to acoustic stimuli.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elie Partouche
- Paris-Saclay Institute of Neurosciences (Neuro-PSI), CNRS UMR 9197, Universite Paris-Saclay, 91400 Saclay, France; (E.P.); (V.A.)
| | - Victor Adenis
- Paris-Saclay Institute of Neurosciences (Neuro-PSI), CNRS UMR 9197, Universite Paris-Saclay, 91400 Saclay, France; (E.P.); (V.A.)
| | - Dan Gnansia
- Department of Scientific and Clinical Research, Oticon Medical, 06224 Vallauris, France; (D.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Pierre Stahl
- Department of Scientific and Clinical Research, Oticon Medical, 06224 Vallauris, France; (D.G.); (P.S.)
| | - Jean-Marc Edeline
- Paris-Saclay Institute of Neurosciences (Neuro-PSI), CNRS UMR 9197, Universite Paris-Saclay, 91400 Saclay, France; (E.P.); (V.A.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Robotics, automation, active electrode arrays, and new devices for cochlear implantation: A contemporary review. Hear Res 2022; 414:108425. [PMID: 34979455 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2021.108425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
In the last two decades, cochlear implant surgery has evolved into a minimally invasive, hearing preservation surgical technique. The devices used during surgery have benefited from technological advances that have allowed modification and possible improvement of the surgical technique. Robotics has recently gained popularity in otology as an effective tool to overcome the surgeon's limitations such as tremor, drift and accurate force control feedback in laboratory testing. Cochlear implantation benefits from robotic assistance in several steps during the surgical procedure: (i) during the approach to the middle ear by automated mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy or through a tunnel from the postauricular skin to the middle ear (i.e. direct cochlear access); (ii) a minimally invasive cochleostomy by a robot-assisted drilling tool; (iii) alignment of the correct insertion axis on the basal cochlear turn; (iv) insertion of the electrode array with a motorized insertion tool. In recent years, the development of bone-attached parallel robots and image-guided surgical robotic systems has allowed the first successful cochlear implantation procedures in patients via a single hole drilled tunnel. Several other robotic systems, new materials, sensing technologies applied to the electrodes, and smart devices have been developed, tested in experimental models and finally some have been used in patients with the aim of reducing trauma in cochleostomy, and permitting slow and more accurate insertion of the electrodes. Despite the promising results in laboratory tests in terms of minimal invasiveness, reduced trauma and better hearing preservation, so far, no clinical benefits on residual hearing preservation or better speech performance have been demonstrated. Before these devices can become the standard approach for cochlear implantation, several points still need to be addressed, primarily cost and duration of the procedure. One can hope that improvement in the cost/benefit ratio will expand the technology to every cochlear implantation procedure. Laboratory research and clinical studies on patients should continue with the aim of making intracochlear implant insertion an atraumatic and reversible gesture for total preservation of the inner ear structure and physiology.
Collapse
|
10
|
Horvath B, Perenyi A, Molnar FA, Nagy R, Csanady M, Kiss JG, Rovo L. A new method of preoperative assessment of correct electrode array alignment based on post-operative measurements in a cochlear implanted cohort. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 279:5631-5638. [PMID: 35727414 PMCID: PMC9649508 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07421-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE During cochlear implantation surgery, a range of complications may occur such as tip fold-over. We recently developed a method to estimate the insertion orientation of the electrode array. The aim of the study was to determine the optimal angle of orientation in a cohort of cochlear implanted patients. METHODS On eighty-five CT scans (80 uncomplicated insertions and 5 cases with tip fold-over), location of the electrode array's Insertion Guide (IG), Orientation marker (OM) and two easily identifiable landmarks (the round window (RW) and the incus short process (ISP)) were manually marked. The angle enclosed by ISP-RW line and the Cochlear™ Slim Modiolar electrode array's OM line determined the electrode array insertion angle. RESULTS The average insertion angle was 45.0-47.2° ± 10.4-12° SD and was validated with 98% confidence interval. Based on the measurements obtained, patients' sex and age had no impact on the size of this angle. Although the angles of the tip fold-over cases (44.9°, 46.9°, 34.2°, 54.3°, 55.9°) fell within this average range, the further it diverted from the average it increased the likelihood for tip fold-over. CONCLUSION Electrode array insertion in the individually calculated angle relative to the visible incus short process provides a useful guide for the surgeon when aiming for the optimal angle, and potentially enhances good surgical outcomes. Our results show that factors other than the orientation angle may additionally contribute to failures in implantation when the Slim Modiolar electrode is used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bence Horvath
- Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
- Department of Oto-Rhino- Laryngology and Head- Neck Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
| | - Adam Perenyi
- Department of Oto-Rhino- Laryngology and Head- Neck Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | | | - Roland Nagy
- Department of Oto-Rhino- Laryngology and Head- Neck Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Miklos Csanady
- Department of Oto-Rhino- Laryngology and Head- Neck Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Jozsef Geza Kiss
- Department of Oto-Rhino- Laryngology and Head- Neck Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Laszlo Rovo
- Department of Oto-Rhino- Laryngology and Head- Neck Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Auinger AB, Dahm V, Liepins R, Riss D, Baumgartner WD, Arnoldner C. Robotic Cochlear Implant Surgery: Imaging-Based Evaluation of Feasibility in Clinical Routine. Front Surg 2021; 8:742219. [PMID: 34660683 PMCID: PMC8511493 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.742219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Robotic surgery has been proposed in various surgical fields to reduce recovery time, scarring, and to improve patients' outcomes. Such innovations are ever-growing and have now reached the field of cochlear implantation. To implement robotic ear surgery in routine, it is of interest if preoperative planning of a safe trajectory to the middle ear is possible with clinically available image data. Methods: We evaluated the feasibility of robotic cochlear implant surgery in 50 patients (100 ears) scheduled for routine cochlear implant procedures based on clinically available imaging. The primary objective was to assess if available high-resolution computed tomography or cone beam tomography imaging is sufficient for planning a trajectory by an otological software. Secondary objectives were to assess the feasibility of cochlear implant surgery with a drill bit diameter of 1.8 mm, which is the currently used as a standard drill bit. Furthermore, it was evaluated if feasibility of robotic surgery could be increased when using smaller drill bit sizes. Cochlear and trajectory parameters of successfully planned ears were collected. Measurements were carried out by two observers and the interrater reliability was assessed using Cohen's Kappa. Results: Under the prerequisite of the available image data being sufficient for the planning of the procedure, up to two thirds of ears were eligible for robotic cochlear implant surgery with the standard drill bit size of 1.8 mm. The main reason for inability to plan the keyhole access was insufficient image resolution causing anatomical landmarks not being accurately identified. Although currently not applicable in robotic cochlear implantation, narrower drill bit sizes ranging from 1.0 to 1.7 mm in diameter could increase feasibility up to 100%. The interrater agreement between the two observers was good for this data set. Discussion: For robotic cochlear implant surgery, imaging with sufficient resolution is essential for preoperative assessment. A slice thickness of <0.3 mm is necessary for trajectory planning. This can be achieved by using digital volume tomography while radiation exposure can be kept to a minimum. Furthermore, surgeons who use the software tool, should be trained on a regular basis in order to achieve planning consistency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Barbara Auinger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Valerie Dahm
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Rudolfs Liepins
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dominik Riss
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Christoph Arnoldner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Torres R, Daoudi H, Lahlou G, Sterkers O, Ferrary E, Mosnier I, Nguyen Y. Restoration of High Frequency Auditory Perception After Robot-Assisted or Manual Cochlear Implantation in Profoundly Deaf Adults Improves Speech Recognition. Front Surg 2021; 8:729736. [PMID: 34568420 PMCID: PMC8461256 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.729736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Robot-assisted cochlear implantation has recently been implemented in clinical practice; however, its effect on hearing outcomes is unknown. The aim of this preliminary study was to evaluate hearing performance 1 year post-implantation whether the electrode array was inserted manually or assisted by a robot. Methods: Forty-two profoundly deaf adults were implanted either manually (n = 21) or assisted by a robot (RobOtol®, Collin, Bagneux, France) with three different electrode array types. Participants were paired by age, and electrode array type. The scalar position of the electrode array in the cochlea was assessed by 3D reconstruction from the pre- and post-implantation computed tomography. Pure-tone audiometry and speech perception in silence (percentage of disyllabic words at 60 dB) were tested on the implanted ear 1 year post-implantation in free-field conditions. The pure-tone average was calculated at 250–500–750 Hz, 500–1,000–2,000–3,000 Hz, and 3,000–4,000–8,000 Hz for low, mid, and high frequencies, respectively. Results: One year after cochlear implantation, restoration of the high-frequency thresholds was associated with better speech perception in silence, but not with low or mid frequencies (p < 0.0001; Adjusted R2 = 0.64, polynomial non-linear regression). Although array translocation was similar using either technique, the number of translocated electrodes was lower when the electrode arrays had been inserted with the assistance of the robot compared with manual insertion (p = 0.018; Fisher's exact test). Conclusion: The restoration of high-frequency thresholds (3,000–4,000–8,000 Hz) by cochlear implantation was associated with good speech perception in silence. The numbers of translocated electrodes were reduced after a robot-assisted insertion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Torres
- Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs, Service Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, AP-HP/Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Centre de Recherche en Audiologie Adulte, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière/Fondation Pour l'Audition, AP-HP, Paris, France.,Technologies et Thérapie Génique Pour la Surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, INSERM, Paris, France.,Departamento de Ciencias Fisiológicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa, Arequipa, Peru
| | - Hannah Daoudi
- Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs, Service Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, AP-HP/Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Centre de Recherche en Audiologie Adulte, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière/Fondation Pour l'Audition, AP-HP, Paris, France.,Technologies et Thérapie Génique Pour la Surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Ghizlene Lahlou
- Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs, Service Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, AP-HP/Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Centre de Recherche en Audiologie Adulte, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière/Fondation Pour l'Audition, AP-HP, Paris, France.,Technologies et Thérapie Génique Pour la Surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Sterkers
- Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs, Service Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, AP-HP/Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Centre de Recherche en Audiologie Adulte, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière/Fondation Pour l'Audition, AP-HP, Paris, France.,Technologies et Thérapie Génique Pour la Surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Evelyne Ferrary
- Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs, Service Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, AP-HP/Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Centre de Recherche en Audiologie Adulte, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière/Fondation Pour l'Audition, AP-HP, Paris, France.,Technologies et Thérapie Génique Pour la Surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Mosnier
- Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs, Service Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, AP-HP/Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Centre de Recherche en Audiologie Adulte, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière/Fondation Pour l'Audition, AP-HP, Paris, France.,Technologies et Thérapie Génique Pour la Surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Yann Nguyen
- Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs, Service Oto-Rhino-Laryngologie, AP-HP/Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.,Centre de Recherche en Audiologie Adulte, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière/Fondation Pour l'Audition, AP-HP, Paris, France.,Technologies et Thérapie Génique Pour la Surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, INSERM, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Panara K, Shahal D, Mittal R, Eshraghi AA. Robotics for Cochlear Implantation Surgery: Challenges and Opportunities. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:e825-e835. [PMID: 33993143 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Recent advancements in robotics have set forth a growing body of evidence for the clinical application of the robotic cochlear implantation (RCI), with many potential benefits. This review aims to summarize these efforts, provide the latest developments in this exciting field, and explore the challenges associated with the clinical implementation of RCI. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE databases. STUDY SELECTION A search was conducted using the keywords "robotics otolaryngology," "robotic cochlear implant," "minimally-invasive cochlear implantation," "minimally-invasive mastoidectomy," and "percutaneous cochlear implant" with all of their synonyms. Literature selection criteria included articles published in English, and articles from 1970 to present. RESULTS The use of robotics in neurotology is a relatively new endeavor that continues to evolve. Robotics is being explored by various groups to facilitate in the various steps of cochlear implant surgery, including drilling a keyhole approach to the middle ear for implants, inner ear access, and electrode insertion into the cochlea. Initial clinical trials have successfully implanted selected subjects using robotics. CONCLUSIONS The use of robotics in cochlear implants remains in its very early stages. It is hoped that robotics will improve clinical outcomes. Although successful implants with robots are reported in the literature, there are some challenges that need to be addressed before this approach can become an acceptable option for the conventional cochlear implant surgery, such as safety, time, efficiency, and cost. However, it is hoped that further advancements in robotic technology will help in overcoming these barriers leading to successful implementation for clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kush Panara
- Department of Otolaryngology, Cochlear Implant and Hearing Research Laboratory
| | - David Shahal
- Department of Otolaryngology, Cochlear Implant and Hearing Research Laboratory
| | - Rahul Mittal
- Department of Otolaryngology, Cochlear Implant and Hearing Research Laboratory
| | - Adrien A Eshraghi
- Department of Otolaryngology, Cochlear Implant and Hearing Research Laboratory
- Department of Neurological Surgery
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Klopp-Dutote N, Lefranc M, Strunski V, Page C. Minimally invasive fully ROBOT-assisted cochlear implantation in humans: Preliminary results in five consecutive patients. Clin Otolaryngol 2021; 46:1326-1330. [PMID: 34310841 DOI: 10.1111/coa.13840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michel Lefranc
- Neurosurgery Department, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France
| | - Vladimir Strunski
- ENT and Head & Neck Surgery Department, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France
| | - Cyril Page
- ENT and Head & Neck Surgery Department, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Torres R, Hochet B, Daoudi H, Carré F, Mosnier I, Sterkers O, Ferrary E, Nguyen Y. Atraumatic Insertion of a Cochlear Implant Pre-Curved Electrode Array by a Robot-Automated Alignment with the Coiling Direction of the Scala Tympani. Audiol Neurootol 2021; 27:148-155. [PMID: 34284383 DOI: 10.1159/000517398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Electrode array translocation is an unpredictable event with all types of arrays, even using a teleoperated robot in a clinical scenario. We aimed to compare the intracochlear trauma produced by the HiFocus™ Mid-Scala (MS) electrode array (Advanced Bionics, Valencia, CA, USA) using a teleoperated robot, with an automated robot connected to a navigation system to align the pre-curved tip of the electrode array with the coiling direction of the scala tympani (ST). METHODS Fifteen freshly frozen temporal bones were implanted with the MS array using the RobOtol® (Collin, Bagneux, France). In the first group (n = 10), the robot was teleoperated to insert the electrode array into the basal turn of the ST under stereomicroscopic vision, and then the array was driven by a slow-speed hydraulic insertion technique with an estimated placement of the pre-curved electrode tip. In the second group (n = 5), 3 points were obtained from the preoperative cone-beam computed tomography: the 2 first defining the ST insertion axis of the basal turn and a third one at the center of the ST at 270°. They provided the information to the automated system (RobOtol® connected with a navigation system) to automatically align the electrode array with the ST insertion axis and to aim the pre-curved tip toward the subsequent coiling of the ST. After this, the electrode array was manually advanced. Finally, the cochleae were obtained and fixed in a crystal resin, and the position of each electrode was determined by a micro-grinding technique. RESULTS In all cases, the electrode array was fully inserted into the cochlea and the depth of insertion was similar using both techniques. With the teleoperated robotic technique, translocations of the array were observed in 7/10 insertions (70%), but neither trauma nor array translocation occurred with automated robotic insertion. CONCLUSION We have successfully tested an automated insertion system (robot + navigation) that could accurately align a pre-curved electrode array to the axis of the basal turn of the ST and its subsequent coiling, which reduced intracochlear insertion trauma and translocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renato Torres
- Technologies et thérapie génique pour la surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur/Inserm, Paris, France.,Departamento de Ciencias Fisiológicas, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa, Arequipa, Peru
| | - Baptiste Hochet
- Technologies et thérapie génique pour la surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur/Inserm, Paris, France.,Unité fonctionnelle Implants auditifs et explorations fonctionnelles, Service ORL, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Hannah Daoudi
- Technologies et thérapie génique pour la surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur/Inserm, Paris, France.,Unité fonctionnelle Implants auditifs et explorations fonctionnelles, Service ORL, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Fabienne Carré
- Technologies et thérapie génique pour la surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur/Inserm, Paris, France.,Unité fonctionnelle Implants auditifs et explorations fonctionnelles, Service ORL, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Isabelle Mosnier
- Technologies et thérapie génique pour la surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur/Inserm, Paris, France.,Unité fonctionnelle Implants auditifs et explorations fonctionnelles, Service ORL, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Sterkers
- Technologies et thérapie génique pour la surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur/Inserm, Paris, France.,Unité fonctionnelle Implants auditifs et explorations fonctionnelles, Service ORL, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Evelyne Ferrary
- Technologies et thérapie génique pour la surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur/Inserm, Paris, France.,Unité fonctionnelle Implants auditifs et explorations fonctionnelles, Service ORL, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Yann Nguyen
- Technologies et thérapie génique pour la surdité, Institut de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur/Inserm, Paris, France.,Unité fonctionnelle Implants auditifs et explorations fonctionnelles, Service ORL, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Jia H, Pan J, Gu W, Tan H, Chen Y, Zhang Z, Jiang M, Li Y, Sterkers O, Wu H. Robot-Assisted Electrode Array Insertion Becomes Available in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: First Report and an Intra-Individual Study. Front Surg 2021; 8:695728. [PMID: 34307444 PMCID: PMC8294934 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.695728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: As an advanced surgical technique to reduce trauma to the inner ear, robot-assisted electrode array (EA) insertion has been applied in adult cochlear implantation (CI) and was approved as a safe surgical procedure that could result in better outcomes. As the mastoid and temporal bones are generally smaller in children, which would increase the difficulty for robot-assisted manipulation, the clinical application of these systems for CI in children has not been reported. Given that the pediatric candidate is the main population, we aim to investigate the safety and reliability of robot-assisted techniques in pediatric cochlear implantation. Methods: Retrospective cohort study at a referral center in Shanghai including all patients of simultaneous bilateral CI with robotic assistance on one side (RobOtol® system, Collin ORL, Bagneux, France), and manual insertion on the other (same brand of EA and CI in both side), from December 2019 to June 2020. The surgical outcomes, radiological measurements (EA positioning, EA insertion depth, mastoidectomy size), and audiological outcomes (Behavior pure-tone audiometry) were evaluated. Results: Five infants (17.8 ± 13.5 months, ranging from 10 to 42 months) and an adult (39 years old) were enrolled in this study. Both perimodiolar and lateral wall EAs were included. The robot-assisted EA insertion was successfully performed in all cases, although the surgical zone in infants was about half the size in adults, and no difference was observed in mastoidectomy size between robot-assisted and manual insertion sides (p = 0.219). The insertion depths of EA with two techniques were similar (P = 0.583). The robot-assisted technique showed no scalar deviation, but scalar deviation occurred for one manually inserted pre-curved EA (16%). Early auditory performance was similar to both techniques. Conclusion: Robot-assisted technique for EA insertion is approved to be used safely and reliably in children, which is possible and potential for better scalar positioning and might improve long-term auditory outcome. Standard mastoidectomy size was enough for robot-assisted technique. This first study marks the arrival of the era of robotic CI for all ages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huan Jia
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases, Shanghai, China
| | - Jinxi Pan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenxi Gu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases, Shanghai, China
| | - Haoyue Tan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhihua Zhang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases, Shanghai, China
| | - Mengda Jiang
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yun Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases, Shanghai, China
| | - Olivier Sterkers
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,APHP, Groupe hospitalo-Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Unit of Otology, Auditory Implants and Skull Base Surgery, Paris, France
| | - Hao Wu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Key Laboratory of Translational Medicine on Ear and Nose Diseases, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Aebischer P, Mantokoudis G, Weder S, Anschuetz L, Caversaccio M, Wimmer W. In-Vitro Study of Speed and Alignment Angle in Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2021; 69:129-137. [PMID: 34110987 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2021.3088232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The insertion of the electrode array is a critical step in cochlear implantation. Herein we comprehensively investigate the impact of the alignment angle and feed-forward speed on deep insertions in artificial scala tympani models with accurate macro-anatomy and controlled frictional properties. METHODS Motorized insertions (n=1033) were performed in six scala tympani models with varying speeds and alignment angles. We evaluated reaction forces and micrographs of the insertion process and developed a mathematical model to estimate the normal force distribution along the electrode arrays. RESULTS Insertions parallel to the cochlear base significantly reduce insertion energies and lead to smoother array movement. Non-constant insertion speeds allow to reduce insertion forces for a fixed total insertion time compared to a constant feed rate. CONCLUSION In cochlear implantation, smoothness and peak forces can be reduced with alignment angles parallel to the scala tympani centerline and with non-constant feed-forward speed profiles. SIGNIFICANCE Our results may help to provide clinical guidelines and improve surgical tools for manual and automated cochlear implantation.
Collapse
|
18
|
Barriat S, Peigneux N, Duran U, Camby S, Lefebvre PP. The Use of a Robot to Insert an Electrode Array of Cochlear Implants in the Cochlea: A Feasibility Study and Preliminary Results. Audiol Neurootol 2021; 26:361-367. [PMID: 33902040 DOI: 10.1159/000513509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cochlear implants (CIs) are commonly used for the rehabilitation of profound bilateral hearing loss. However, patients with substantial residual acoustic hearing are potential CI candidates. Because of both improvements in technology and advancements in surgical techniques, it may be possible to preserve hearing to some extent. For more than a decade, it has been suggested that robots are used to perform middle ear surgery. We evaluated the use of the RobOtol® otologic robot specifically to insert CI electrodes into the inner ear. METHODS CI surgery with the conventional approach was performed under general anesthesia. The MED-El Flex 24-electrode array was inserted using RobOtol®. Video recordings were used to calculate the speed of insertion. The positions of the electrodes were evaluated using a cone beam CT. All subjects underwent pure-tone audiometry tests before and after surgery, and the pure-tone average (PTA) was calculated from 250 to 4,000 Hz. RESULTS The robot inserted implants in 5 patients, and complete insertion of the electrode array was achieved. The speed of insertion of the electrode array was 0.88 ± 0.12 mm/s. The mean loss of the PTA for 5 frequencies (250, 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz) was 13.60 ± 7.70 dB. Only 1 patient showed a loss of the PTA by >20 dB. For these 5 patients, the cone beam CT findings showed that all the electrode arrays were in the tympanic ramp and had a grade of 0. The results were compared with those obtained from a cohort of 17 patients who underwent manual implantation of a MED-El Flex 24-electrode array. CONCLUSION To minimize disturbance to the cochlea while atraumatic electrode arrays are inserted, electrodes can be inserted at a constant, slow speed in the inner ear with the assistance of the RobOtol® robot in a normal clinical surgical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sébastien Barriat
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Liège University, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Nicolas Peigneux
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Liège University, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Unal Duran
- Department of Radiology, Liège University, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Severine Camby
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Liège University, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Philippe P Lefebvre
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Liège University, CHU de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Robot-assisted Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Insertion in Adults: A Comparative Study With Manual Insertion. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:e438-e444. [PMID: 33306661 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the first cochlear array insertions using a robot-assisted technique, with different types of straight or precurved electrode arrays, compared with arrays manually inserted into the cochlea. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective review. SETTING Tertiary otologic center. PATIENTS Twenty cochlear implantations in the robot-assisted group and 40 in the manually inserted group. INTERVENTIONS Cochlear implantations using a robot-assisted technique (RobOtol) with straight (eight Cochlear CI522/622, and eight Advanced Bionics Hifocus Slim J) or precurved (four Advanced Bionics Hifocus Mid-Scala) matched to manual cochlear implantations. Three-dimensional reconstruction images of the basilar membrane and the electrode array were obtained from pre- and postimplantation computed tomography. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Rate and localization of scalar translocations. RESULTS For straight electrode arrays, scalar translocations occurred in 19% (3/16) of the robot-assisted group and 31% (10/32) of the manually inserted group. Considering the number of translocated electrodes, this was lower in the robot-assisted group (7%) than in the manually inserted group (16%) (p < 0.0001, χ2 test). For precurved electrode arrays, scalar translocations occurred in 50% (2/4) of the robot-assisted group and 38% (3/8) of the manually inserted group. CONCLUSION This study showed a safe and reliable insertion of different electrode array types with a robot-assisted technique, with a less traumatic robotic insertion of straight electrode arrays when compared with manual insertion.
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Given the heterogeneity of papers about electrocochleography (ECochG) and cochlear implantation (CI) and the absence of a systematic review in the current literature, the aim of this work was to analyze the uses of ECochG in the different stages of CI. DATA SOURCES A search of PubMed from inception to December 8, 2019, with cross-references, was executed. Keywords were: "Cochlear Implant" OR "Cochlear Implantation" AND "Electrocochleography" OR "ECochG." The main eligibility criteria were English-language articles, investigating the use of ECochG in the different phases of CI. STUDY SELECTION Literature reviews, editorials, case reports, conference papers were excluded, as were papers in which ECochG was just sporadically executed. DATA EXTRACTION The quality of the included studies was assessed using "The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology" (STROBE) Statement. DATA SYNTHESIS A total of 95 articles were identified and 60 papers were included. The included articles covered a timeframe from 2003 to 2019. Of the 60 papers, 46 were human studies, 12 animal studies, and two involved more data sets. Eleven related to the diagnostic phase, 43 described intraoperative monitoring, and 10 were regarding follow-up testing. Hearing preservation was the most discussed topic with 25 included articles. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE ECochG measurements appeared to be useful in many aspects of CI, such as hearing preservation. Our review is the first that shows the evolution of the technique and how much has been achieved from the earliest experiments to the most recent signal process refinements and device implementation in CI.
Collapse
|
21
|
Jank BJ, Haas M, Riss D, Baumgartner WD. Acceptance of patients towards task-autonomous robotic cochlear implantation: An exploratory study. Int J Med Robot 2020; 17:1-6. [PMID: 32949426 PMCID: PMC7900970 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Background Recently, task‐autonomous image‐guided robotic cochlear implantation has been successfully completed in patients. However, no data exist on patients' perspective of this new technology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the acceptance of patients towards task‐autonomous robotic cochlear implantation (TARCI). Methods We prospectively surveyed 63 subjects (51 patients and 12 parents of infants) scheduled for manual cochlear implantation. We collected sociodemographic and clinico‐pathological characteristics and their attitude towards TARCI for themselves or their child using a questionnaire. Differences between variables were analysed using one‐way analysis of variance and Spearman's rho was used to test for correlation. Results Seventy‐three percent of patients and 84% of parents expressed a high acceptance towards TARCI for themselves, or their child, respectively. Interestingly, patients with a negative attitude towards TARCI were significantly younger. Conclusion The attitude of patients and parents likely does not represent a barrier towards application of this new technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard J Jank
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Haas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dominik Riss
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew L Carlson
- From the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and the Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|