1
|
Plonowska-Hirschfeld KA, Eltawil Y, Soroudi D, Patel NN, Park AM, Knott PD. Assessment of Variability in Free Flap Color Match to Facial Skin by Donor Site and Race. Laryngoscope 2024; 134:3581-3586. [PMID: 38587169 DOI: 10.1002/lary.31436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 03/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To use portable colorimetry to quantify color differences between facial skin and potential three head and neck microvascular free tissue transfer (MFTT) donor sites-radial forearm (RF), anterolateral thigh (ALT), and fibula (FF)-and compare these differences by pigmentation of the donor site skin and self-identified race. METHODS In this cross-sectional cohort study, healthy volunteers consented to handheld colorimeter measurements at the three potential MFTT donor sites (RF, ALT, FF) to quantify color match to the facial skin using the CIE color space (DeltaE). The comparison of ipsilateral to contralateral cheek served as control for measurements. Cross-sectional measurements in healthy volunteers were then compared to measurements obtained in postoperative head and neck MFTT patients. RESULTS DeltaE measurements were obtained for 128 healthy controls and 24 postoperative patients (N = 152). With increasing lightness (decreased pigmentation) of the skin at the donor site, the color match significantly worsened (higher DeltaE) across all potential MFTT donor sites (all p < 0.05). DeltaE from healthy controls closely approximated postoperative color match measurements in patients who underwent cervicofacial MFTT (DeltaE RF: 5.3 vs. 6.0, p = 0.432; DeltaE ALT: 6.2 vs. 6.4, p = 0.822; DeltaE FF: 6.0 vs. 6.4, p = 0.806). CONCLUSION Patients with decreased skin pigmentation who are undergoing head and neck MFTT may experience worse color discrepancy between cervicofacial skin and the transferred skin paddle than those with more pigmented skin. Portable colorimetry may identify patients who could benefit from interventions such as dermis-resected free tissue reconstruction with skin grafting to improve postoperative appearance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 134:3581-3586, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yasmin Eltawil
- School of Medicine, UCS, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Daniel Soroudi
- School of Medicine, UCS, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Neil N Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Andrea M Park
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - P Daniel Knott
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, UCSF, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang H, Duan R, Ding Y, Xu J, Tian Y. Views of health care professionals on the implementation of preoperative advance care planning in older patients with head and neck cancer: Q methodology. Int J Nurs Sci 2024; 11:162-170. [PMID: 38707689 PMCID: PMC11064590 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the views of health care professionals in a head and neck surgical department toward the implementation of advance care planning prior to surgery for older patients with head and neck cancer. Method Q methodology was used to explore and analyze participants' views by combining quantitative and qualitative methods. Participants were asked to rank 35 Q statements generated via semi-structured interviews and a literature review and to explain the reasons for their ranking in subsequent interviews. The data was then analyzed and used to develop a factor series to illustrate participants' views. Results This study surveyed 15 health care professionals, including eight doctors and seven nurses. The views of health care professionals toward preoperative implementation of advance care planning discussions were varied and could be categorized into three types: defending the autonomy of patients, patients' knowledge and the Chinese traditional cultural context hinder the implementation of preoperative advance care planning, and lack of confidence in performing preoperative advance care planning. Conclusions Although the health care professionals in the head and neck surgical department in this study recognized the benefits of preoperative discussions regarding advance care planning, patients' knowledge level, traditional Chinese values, inadequate capacity among health care professionals, and unsound legal policies have caused these professionals to have misgivings about preoperative counseling and discussing advance care planning with patients. Further studies should be conducted, and strategies to overcome barriers to discussions of preoperative advance care planning should be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huixian Yang
- School of Nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Ruirui Duan
- School of Nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Yongxia Ding
- School of Nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Jing Xu
- School of Nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Yanzhi Tian
- School of Nursing, Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thamm C, McCarthy AL, Yates P. A Discourse of Deviance: Blame, Shame, Stigma and the Social Construction of Head and Neck Cancer. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2024; 34:398-410. [PMID: 38019709 PMCID: PMC10996294 DOI: 10.1177/10497323231213819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Cancer of the head and neck is a confronting condition, as the disease and its treatments alter the appearance and function of body organs associated with physical appearance and identity. Many of the risk factors for head and neck cancers, including tobacco, alcohol, and human papilloma virus, can also have significant negative social and moral permutations. Language and action (discourse) plays an important role in constructing disease and illness and shape the way it is managed, both institutionally and socially. This research used a critical constructionist lens to investigate how the common discourses surrounding head and neck cancer are constructed within the healthcare context and how this influences patients and healthcare professionals' responses to the illness. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, field noting, journaling and literature reviews. Analysis was guided by a three-dimensional approach to critical discourse analysis that investigated text, discursive practices, and social context. The overarching finding was that deviance dominates the common discourse and shapes head and neck cancer and responses to it. Deviance is channelled through metaphors, adjectives, descriptors, and collective nouns and is made overt through labelling, avoidance, blaming, shame, and categorization. Discourse is contextualized by a sociocultural understanding that when someone deviates from what is perceived as normal, they are devalued. Open dialogue and reflection on head and neck cancer discourse could enable better understanding of how people experience their condition and inform more supportive responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Thamm
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Patsy Yates
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yung AE, Luong J, Crouch G, Hong AM, Ananda A, Taylor S, Kotronakis I, Low TH(H, Elliott MS, McBride K, Rutherford C, Clark JR, Ch’ng S. First Phase Development of a Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Midface Oncology. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2024; 12:e5689. [PMID: 38525491 PMCID: PMC10959565 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000005689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
Background Facial cancer surgery involving the midface (comprising the lower eyelids, nose, cheeks, and upper lip) can have debilitating life-changing functional, social, and psychological impacts on the patient. Midface symptoms are inadequately captured by existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs are increasingly used for individual patient care, quality improvement, and standardized reporting of treatment outcomes. This study aimed to present our findings from the first phase of the development of a midface, specifically periocular and nasal, PROM. Methods After international guidance for PROM development, the first phase comprised identification of salient issues and item generation. Fifteen patients who had midface surgery and 10 clinicians from various specialties with more than 5 years' experience treating these patients were recruited. Semi-structured interviews explored aesthetic, functional, social, and psychological outcomes, with specific attention to deficiencies in current PROMs. Thematic analysis was used to develop an item pool, and group interviews with clinicians were carried out to create and refine PROM scales. Results Qualitative data from patient interviews were grouped into aesthetic, functional, and psychosocial domains for the eyelids and nose. Ninety-nine draft items were generated across these domains. Following focus group discussions, the final version of the midface-specific PROM contained 31 items (13 eye-specific, 10-nose-specific, eight general midface items). Conclusions This midface-specific PROM is valuable in assessing and comparing patient-reported outcomes in those who have undergone complex resection and reconstruction of the midface. This PROM is currently undergoing field testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda E. Yung
- From the Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jason Luong
- From the Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Gareth Crouch
- From the Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Angela M. Hong
- From the Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Arjuna Ananda
- Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Simon Taylor
- Department of Oculoplastic Surgery, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ilias Kotronakis
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Tsu-Hui (Hubert) Low
- From the Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Head & Neck Cancer Institute, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael S. Elliott
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW Australia
| | - Kate McBride
- Institute of Academic Surgery at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Claudia Rutherford
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Nursing School, Cancer Care Research Unit (CNRU), Sydney, NSW, Australia
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan R. Clark
- Institute of Academic Surgery at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Head & Neck Cancer Institute, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sydney Ch’ng
- Institute of Academic Surgery at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Head & Neck Cancer Institute, Chris O’Brien Lifehouse Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Graboyes EM, Kistner-Griffin E, Hill EG, Maurer S, Balliet W, Williams AM, Padgett L, Yan F, Rush A, Johnson B, McLeod T, Dahne J, Ruggiero KJ, Sterba KR. Mechanism underlying a brief cognitive behavioral treatment for head and neck cancer survivors with body image distress. Support Care Cancer 2023; 32:32. [PMID: 38102496 PMCID: PMC10798060 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08248-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Body image distress (BID) among head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors is a debilitating toxicity associated with depression, anxiety, stigma, and poor quality of life. BRIGHT (Building a Renewed ImaGe after Head & neck cancer Treatment) is a brief cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) that reduces BID for these patients. This study examines the mechanism underlying BRIGHT. METHODS In this randomized clinical trial, HNC survivors with clinically significant BID were randomized to receive five weekly psychologist-led video tele-CBT sessions (BRIGHT) or dose-and delivery matched survivorship education (attention control [AC]). Body image coping strategies, the hypothesized mediators, were assessed using the Body Image Coping Skills Inventory (BICSI). HNC-related BID was measured with the Inventory to Measure and Assess imaGe disturbancE-Head and Neck (IMAGE-HN). Causal mediation analyses were used to estimate the mediated effects of changes in BICSI scores on changes in IMAGE-HN scores. RESULTS Among 44 HNC survivors with BID allocated to BRIGHT (n = 20) or AC (n = 24), mediation analyses showed that BRIGHT decreased avoidant body image coping (mean change in BICSI-Avoidance scale score) from baseline to 1-month post-intervention relative to AC (p = 0.039). Decreases in BICSI-Avoidance scores from baseline to 1-month resulted in decreases in IMAGE-HN scores from baseline to 3 months (p = 0.009). The effect of BRIGHT on IMAGE-HN scores at 3 months was partially mediated by a decrease in BICSI-Avoidance scores (p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS This randomized trial provides preliminary evidence that BRIGHT reduces BID among HNC survivors by decreasing avoidant body image coping. Further research is necessary to confirm these results and enhance the development of interventions targeting relevant pathways to reduce BID among HNC survivors. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03831100 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
- Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC, Charleston, SC, USA.
| | - Emily Kistner-Griffin
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Elizabeth G Hill
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Stacey Maurer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Wendy Balliet
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Amy M Williams
- Office of Physician Well-Being and Professionalism, Corewell Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Lynne Padgett
- Veteran Affairs Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Flora Yan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Angie Rush
- Head and Neck Cancer Alliance, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Brad Johnson
- Head and Neck Cancer Alliance, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Taylor McLeod
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Jennifer Dahne
- Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC, Charleston, SC, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Kenneth J Ruggiero
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Katherine R Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Graboyes EM, Kistner-Griffin E, Hill EG, Maurer S, Balliet W, Williams AM, Padgett L, Yan F, Rush A, Johnson B, McLeod T, Dahne J, Ruggiero KJ, Sterba KR. Mechanism Underlying a Brief Cognitive Behavioral Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer Survivors with Body Image Distress. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3303379. [PMID: 37720013 PMCID: PMC10503855 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3303379/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Body image distress (BID) among head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors is a debilitating toxicity associated with depression, anxiety, stigma, and poor quality of life. BRIGHT (Building a Renewed ImaGe after Head & neck cancer Treatment) is a brief cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) that reduces BID for these patients. This study examines the mechanism underlying BRIGHT. Methods In this randomized clinical trial, HNC survivors with clinically significant BID were randomized to receive 5 weekly psychologist-led video tele-CBT sessions (BRIGHT) or dose-and delivery matched survivorship education (attention control [AC]). Body image coping strategies, the hypothesized mediators, were assessed using the Body Image Coping Skills Inventory (BICSI). HNC-related BID was measured with the IMAGE-HN. Causal mediation analyses were used to estimate the mediated effects of changes in BICSI scores on changes in IMAGE-HN scores. Results Among 44 HNC survivors with BID, mediation analyses showed that BRIGHT decreased avoidant body image coping (mean change in BICSI-Avoidance scale score) from baseline to 1-month post-intervention relative to AC (p = 0.039). Decreases in BICSI-Avoidance scores from baseline to 1-month decreased IMAGE-HN scores from baseline to 3-months (p = 0.009). The effect of BRIGHT on IMAGE-HN scores at 3-months was partially mediated by a decrease in BICSI-Avoidance scores (p = 0.039). Conclusions This randomized trial provides preliminary evidence that BRIGHT reduces BID among HNC survivors by decreasing avoidant body image coping. Further research is necessary to confirm these results and enhance the development of interventions targeting relevant pathways to reduce BID among HNC survivors. Trial Registration This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03831100 on February 5, 2019.
Collapse
|
7
|
Graboyes EM, Kistner-Griffin E, Hill EG, Maurer S, Balliet W, Williams AM, Padgett L, Yan F, Rush A, Johnson B, McLeod T, Dahne J, Ruggiero KJ, Sterba KR. Efficacy of a brief cognitive behavioral therapy for head and neck cancer survivors with body image distress: secondary outcomes from the BRIGHT pilot randomized clinical trial. J Cancer Surviv 2023:10.1007/s11764-023-01454-6. [PMID: 37644354 PMCID: PMC10902187 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01454-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Body image distress (BID) among head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors leads to depression, social isolation, stigma, and poor quality of life. BRIGHT (Building a Renewed ImaGe after Head and neck cancer Treatment) is a brief, tailored cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) that reduces HNC-related BID. This trial examines the effect of BRIGHT on psychosocial outcomes among HNC survivors with BID. METHODS In this pilot randomized trial, HNC survivors with clinically significant BID were randomized to 5 weekly psychologist-led tele-CBT sessions (BRIGHT) or dose and delivery-matched survivorship education (attention control [AC]). Secondary psychosocial outcomes were assessed using validated patient-reported outcomes at baseline and 1 and 3-month post-intervention. RESULTS Among 44 HNC survivors with BID, BRIGHT resulted in a greater reduction in depression relative to AC (mean model-based 1-month difference in Δ PROMIS SF v1.0-Depression 8a score, -3.4; 90% CI, -6.4 to -0.4; 3-month difference, -4.3; 90% CI, -7.8 to -0.8). BRIGHT also decreased shame and stigma relative to AC (mean model-based 3-month difference in Δ Shame and Stigma Scale score, -9.7; 90% CI, -15.2 to -4.2) and social isolation (mean model-based 3-month difference in Δ PROMIS SF v2.0 Social Isolation 8a score, -2.9; 90% CI, -5.8 to -0.1). CONCLUSIONS In this planned secondary analysis of a pilot RCT, BRIGHT improved a broad array of psychosocial outcomes among HNC survivors with BID. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03831100 . IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS These promising preliminary data suggest the need for a large efficacy trial evaluating the effect of BRIGHT on psychosocial outcomes among HNC survivors with BID.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
| | - Emily Kistner-Griffin
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Elizabeth G Hill
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Stacey Maurer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Wendy Balliet
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Amy M Williams
- Office of Physician Well-Being and Professionalism, Corewell Health, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Lynne Padgett
- Veteran Affairs Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Flora Yan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Angie Rush
- Head and Neck Cancer Alliance, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Brad Johnson
- Head and Neck Cancer Alliance, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Taylor McLeod
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Jennifer Dahne
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Kenneth J Ruggiero
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Katherine R Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Graboyes EM, Kistner-Griffin E, Hill EG, Maurer S, Balliet W, Williams AM, Padgett L, Yan F, Rush A, Johnson B, McLeod T, Dahne J, Ruggiero KJ, Sterba KR. Efficacy of a Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer Survivors with Body Image Distress: Secondary Outcomes from the BRIGHT Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3222601. [PMID: 37609318 PMCID: PMC10441452 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3222601/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: Body image distress (BID) among head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors leads to depression, social isolation, stigma, and poor quality of life. BRIGHT ( B uilding a R enewed I ma G e after H ead & neck cancer T reatment) is a brief, tailored cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) that reduces HNC-related BID. This trial examines the effect of BRIGHT on psychosocial outcomes among HNC survivors with BID. Methods: In this pilot randomized trial, HNC survivors with clinically significant BID were randomized to 5 weekly psychologist-led tele-CBT sessions (BRIGHT) or dose-and delivery matched survivorship education (attention control [AC]). Secondary psychosocial outcomes were assessed using validated patient-reported outcomes at baseline and 1- and 3-months post-intervention. Results: Among 44 HNC survivors with BID, BRIGHT resulted in a greater reduction in depression relative to AC (mean model-based 1-month difference in Δ PROMIS SF v1.0-Depression 8a score, -3.4; 90% CI, -6.4 to -0.4; 3-month difference, -4.3; 90% CI, -7.8 to -0.8). BRIGHT also decreased shame and stigma relative to AC (mean model-based 3-month difference in Δ Shame and Stigma Scale score, -9.7; 90% CI, -15.2 to -4.2) and social isolation (mean model-based 3-month difference in Δ PROMIS SF v2.0 Social Isolation 8a score, -2.9; 90% CI, -5.8 to -0.1). Conclusions: In this planned secondary analysis of a pilot RCT, BRIGHT improved a broad array of psychosocial outcomes among HNC survivors with BID. Implications for Cancer Survivors: These promising preliminary data suggest the need for a large efficacy trial evaluating the effect of BRIGHT on psychosocial outcomes among HNC survivors with BID. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03831100.
Collapse
|
9
|
Graboyes EM, Barbon CEA. Optimizing Function and Appearance After Head and Neck Reconstruction: Measurement and Intervention. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2023; 56:835-852. [PMID: 37246027 PMCID: PMC10330938 DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2023.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Approximately 50% of head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors are left with dysphagia as a result of treatment sequele, and 25% of survivors experience clinically significant body image distress (BID). Both dysphagia and BID adversely affect quality of life and should be tracked using validated clinician- and patient-reported outcome measures such as the Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer, MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory, and Inventory to Measure and Assess imaGe disturbancE-Head & Neck (IMAGE-HN). Subjective and objective evaluation measures are critical to dysphagia workup and management. Building a renewed image after head and neck cancer treatment, a brief telemedicine-based cognitive behavioral therapy, has become the first evidence-based treatment for BID among HNC survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, MSC 550, Charleston, SC 29425, USA; Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina
| | - Carly E A Barbon
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1445, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030-400, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Survivorship for head and neck cancer patients presents unique challenges related to the anatomic location of their disease. After treatment, patients often have functional impairments requiring additional care and support. In addition, patients may have psychological challenges managing the effect of the disease and treatment. Routine screening is recommended for the identification of psychological conditions. This article reviews the latest research on key psychological conditions associated with head and neck cancer. It discusses risk factors for the development of each condition and provides recommendations for the management of patients who may present with psychological concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ciaran Lane
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Ryan C. Higgins
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Neerav Goyal
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang H, Nicklaus K, Jewett E, Rehani E, Chen TA, Engelmann J, Bordes MC, Chopra D, Reece GP, Lee ZH, Markey MK. Assessing saliency models of observers' visual attention on acquired facial differences. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2023; 10:S11908. [PMID: 37091297 PMCID: PMC10118307 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.10.s1.s11908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Saliency models that predict observers' visual attention to facial differences could enable psychosocial interventions to help patients and their families anticipate staring behaviors. The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of existing saliency models to predict observers' visual attention to acquired facial differences arising from head and neck cancer and its treatment. Approach Saliency maps predicted by graph-based visual saliency (GBVS), an artificial neural network (ANN), and a face-specific model were compared to observer fixation maps generated from eye-tracking of lay observers presented with clinical facial photographs of patients with a visible or functional impairment manifesting in the head and neck region. We used a linear mixed-effects model to investigate observer and stimulus factors associated with the saliency models' accuracy. Results The GBVS model predicted many irrelevant regions (e.g., shirt collars) as being salient. The ANN model underestimated observers' attention to facial differences relative to the central region of the face. Compared with GBVS and ANN, the face-specific saliency model was more accurate on this task; however, the face-specific model underestimated the saliency of deviations from the typical structure of human faces. The linear mixed-effects model revealed that the location of the facial difference (midface versus periphery) was significantly associated with saliency model performance. Model performance was also significantly impacted by interobserver variability. Conclusions Existing saliency models are not adequate for predicting observers' visual attention to facial differences. Extensions of face-specific saliency models are needed to accurately predict the saliency of acquired facial differences arising from head and neck cancer and its treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haoqi Wang
- The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Austin, Texas, United States
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Plastic Surgery, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Krista Nicklaus
- The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Austin, Texas, United States
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Plastic Surgery, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Eloise Jewett
- The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Austin, Texas, United States
| | - Eeshaan Rehani
- The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Austin, Texas, United States
| | - Tzuan A. Chen
- University of Houston, HEALTH Research Institute, Houston, Texas, United States
- University of Houston, Department of Psychological, Health, and Learning Sciences, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Jeff Engelmann
- Rogers Behavioral Health, Oconomowoc, Wisconsin, United States
| | - Mary Catherine Bordes
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Plastic Surgery, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Deepti Chopra
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Psychiatry, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Gregory P. Reece
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Plastic Surgery, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Z-Hye Lee
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Plastic Surgery, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Mia K. Markey
- The University of Texas at Austin, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Austin, Texas, United States
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Imaging Physics, Houston, Texas, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
De Ravin E, Armache M, Campbell F, Rising KL, Worster B, Handley NR, Fundakowski CE, Cognetti DM, Mady LJ. Feasibility and Cost of Telehealth Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care: A Systematic Review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 168:1312-1323. [PMID: 36939546 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of telehealth head and neck cancer (HNC) survivorship care. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL. REVIEW METHODS A systematic search for peer-reviewed feasibility studies on telehealth models for HNC survivorship care published between 2005 and 2021 was conducted using the terms "head and neck cancer" and "telehealth" and their synonyms. Inclusion criteria were studies on telehealth survivorship program interventions for HNC patients with quantitative feasibility outcome measures (eg, enrollment, retention, attrition/dropout rate, adherence/task completion rate, patient satisfaction, cost). RESULTS Thirty-eight studies out of 1557 identified met inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. Feasibility outcomes evaluated were enrollment and attrition rates, adherence/task completion rates, patient satisfaction, and user feedback surveys in different survivorship domains. Patient enrollment ranged from 20.8% to 85.7%, while attrition ranged from 7% to 47.7%. Overall, adherence was 30.2% higher in the intervention group than in the control group (46.8% vs 16.6%). Studies with cost analysis found telehealth models of care to be statistically significantly less expensive and more cost-efficient than the standard model of care, with a $642.30 saving per patient (n = 3). Telehealth models also substantially reduced work time saving per visit (on average, 7 days per visit). CONCLUSION While telehealth survivorship programs are feasible and cost-effective and are associated with improved patient outcomes, they might not be ideal for every patient. Further investigations are needed to understand the role of telehealth in survivorship care, given the variability in study design, reporting, measures, and methodological quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma De Ravin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Maria Armache
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Frank Campbell
- Penn Libraries, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kristin L Rising
- Jefferson Center for Connected Care, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Brooke Worster
- Department of Hospice and Palliative Care, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nathan R Handley
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christopher E Fundakowski
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David M Cognetti
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Leila J Mady
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cannon ST, Gabbard J, Walsh RC, Statler TM, Browne JD, Marterre B. Concordant palliative care delivery in advanced head and neck cancer. Am J Otolaryngol 2023; 44:103675. [PMID: 36302326 PMCID: PMC9743959 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2022.103675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe the palliative care consultation practices in an academic head and neck surgery practice. METHODS This is a retrospective review of a palliative care database and the health record for all palliative care consultations of patients suffering from advanced stage head and neck cancer within a 21-month period. RESULTS Ten head and neck cancer patients received palliative care consults while on the otolaryngology service. One consultation occurred preoperatively; nine occurred postoperatively, on a median of hospital day 9. At the time of referral, seven patients were in the ICU and three were on a surgical floor. Code status de-escalation occurred in six patients and psycho-socio-spiritual suffering was supported in all consultations. Nine patients died within six months, with a median post-consultation survival of 35 days. Of these, two died in an ICU, five were discharged to hospice, one to a SNF, and one to a LTACH. CONCLUSION Palliative care consultation in this advanced head and neck cancer cohort was commonly late, however, significant suffering was mitigated following most consults. Palliative care specialists are experts at eliciting patient values, determining acceptable tradeoffs and suffering limitations by employing a shared decision-making process that ends with a patient-centered value-congruent treatment recommendation. Oftentimes, this embraces curative-intent or palliative surgery, along with contingency plans for unacceptable value-incongruent postoperative outcomes. Enhanced awareness of the benefits of embracing concordant palliative care in advanced head and neck cancer patients may help overcome the significant barriers to involving palliative care experts earlier.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydney T. Cannon
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Atrium Health-Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America
| | - Jennifer Gabbard
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Palliative Care, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Atrium Health-Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America
| | - Rebecca C. Walsh
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Atrium Health-Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America
| | - Tiffany M. Statler
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Palliative Care, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Atrium Health-Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America
| | - J. Dale Browne
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Atrium Health-Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America,Corresponding author at: 1 Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, United States of America. (J.D. Browne)
| | - Buddy Marterre
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Palliative Care, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Atrium Health-Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America,Department of General Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine and Atrium Health-Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
The role of the clinical nurse specialist in head and neck cancer care. Br Dent J 2022; 233:806-811. [DOI: 10.1038/s41415-022-5143-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
15
|
Shunmugasundaram C, Dhillon HM, Butow PN, Sundaresan P, Chittem M, Akula N, Veeraiah S, Huilgol N, Rutherford C. Body Image Scale: Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties in Three Indian Head and Neck Cancer Language Groups. Front Psychol 2022; 13:779850. [PMID: 35645858 PMCID: PMC9135105 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.779850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Body image is a subjective concept encompassing a person's views and emotions about their body. Head and neck cancer (HNC) diagnosis and treatment affects several psychosocial concepts including body image. Large numbers of HNC patients are diagnosed each year in India but there are no suitable measures in regional languages to assess their body image. This study assessed the psychometric properties of the Body Image Scale (BIS), a measure suitable for clinical and research use in HNC populations, translated into Tamil, Telugu and Hindi and compared body image distress between language groups. Methods Translated versions of BIS were completed by HNC patients recruited from three cancer centers across India one time only. Psychometric evaluation was conducted including factor analysis using principal component analysis and internal consistency reliability using Cronbach's alpha. Patients completed the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) C-30 and EORTC QLQ HN-35 measures to enable exploration of convergent and discriminant validity. ANOVA was used to calculate difference in mean values for body image. Results Our sample included 621 HNC patients (Tamil = 205, Telugu = 216, Hindi = 200). Factor analysis revealed a one-factor solution and Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged between 0.891 and 0.969 indicating good reliability. Hypothesized correlations between similar and different constructs were as expected, supporting construct validity. On the BIS, we found a statistically significant difference (F = 11.0954, P < 0.05) between means of Tamil, Telugu, and Hindi groups, with higher body image scores in Telugu (M = 12.86; SD = 7.65) and Hindi groups (M = 12.52; SD = 7.36) indicating more symptoms/body image distress, when compared to Tamil population (M = 9.28; SD = 10.04). Conclusion The reliability and validity of the three translated Indian versions of the BIS were maintained, providing a method for assessing body image of HNC population worldwide speaking Tamil, Telugu, and Hindi across the illness trajectory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chindhu Shunmugasundaram
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Haryana M. Dhillon
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Phyllis N. Butow
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Puma Sundaresan
- Radiation Oncology Network, Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Sydney Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mahati Chittem
- Department of Liberal Arts, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Sangareddy, India
| | - Niveditha Akula
- Department of Liberal Arts, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Sangareddy, India
| | | | - Nagraj Huilgol
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Nanavati Super Speciality Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Claudia Rutherford
- Quality of Life Office, School of Psychology, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Cancer Nursing Research Unit, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Goyal N, Day A, Epstein J, Goodman J, Graboyes E, Jalisi S, Kiess AP, Ku JA, Miller MC, Panwar A, Patel VA, Sacco A, Sandulache V, Williams AM, Deschler D, Farwell DG, Nathan C, Fakhry C, Agrawal N. Head and neck cancer survivorship consensus statement from the American Head and Neck Society. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2022; 7:70-92. [PMID: 35155786 PMCID: PMC8823162 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To provide a consensus statement describing best practices and evidence regarding head and neck cancer survivorship. METHODS Key topics regarding head and neck cancer survivorship were identified by the multidisciplinary membership of the American Head and Neck Society Survivorship, Supportive Care & Rehabilitation Service. Guidelines were generated by combining expert opinion and a review of the literature and categorized by level of evidence. RESULTS Several areas regarding survivorship including dysphonia, dysphagia, fatigue, chronic pain, intimacy, the ability to return to work, financial toxicity, lymphedema, psycho-oncology, physical activity, and substance abuse were identified and discussed. Additionally, the group identified and described the role of key clinicians in survivorship including surgical, medical and radiation oncologists; dentists; primary care physicians; psychotherapists; as well as physical, occupational, speech, and respiratory therapists. CONCLUSION Head and neck cancer survivorship is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach centered around patients and their caregivers. As survival related to head and neck cancer treatment improves, addressing post-treatment concerns appropriately is critically important to our patient's quality of life. There continues to be a need to define effective and efficient programs that can coordinate this multidisciplinary effort toward survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neerav Goyal
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryThe Pennsylvania State University, College of MedicineHersheyPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Andrew Day
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDallasTexasUSA
| | - Joel Epstein
- Department of SurgeryCedars SinaiLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
- City of HopeCaliforniaDuarteUSA
| | - Joseph Goodman
- Ear, Nose and Throat CenterGeorge Washington UniversityWashingtonDistrict of ColumbiaUSA
| | - Evan Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSouth CarolinaUSA
| | - Scharukh Jalisi
- Department of OtolaryngologyBeth Israel DeaconessBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - Ana P. Kiess
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation SciencesJohns Hopkins MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Jamie A. Ku
- Head and Neck InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandOhioUSA
| | - Matthew C. Miller
- Department of OtolaryngologyUniversity of Rochester Medical CenterRochesterNew YorkUSA
| | - Aru Panwar
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Methodist Estabrook Cancer CenterNebraska Methodist HospitalOmahaNebraskaUSA
| | - Vijay A. Patel
- Department of OtolaryngologyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghPennsylvaniaUSA
| | - Assuntina Sacco
- Department of Medical OncologyUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaCaliforniaUSA
| | - Vlad Sandulache
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryBaylor College of MedicineHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Amy M. Williams
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryHenry Ford Health SystemDetroitMichiganUSA
| | - Daniel Deschler
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck SurgeryMassachusetts Eye and EarBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - D. Gregory Farwell
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of California DavisDavisCaliforniaUSA
| | - Cherie‐Ann Nathan
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryLouisiana State UniversityShreveportLouisianaUSA
| | - Carole Fakhry
- Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryJohns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimoreMarylandUSA
| | - Nishant Agrawal
- Department of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of Chicago Pritzker School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Macias D, Hand BN, Pipkorn P, Williams AM, Chang SS, Zenga J, Nilsen ML, Rhoten BA, Huang AT, Osazuwa-Peters N, Maurer S, Balliet W, Li H, Ruggiero KJ, Sterba KR, Graboyes EM. Association of Inventory to Measure and Assess imaGe Disturbance - Head and Neck Scores With Clinically Meaningful Body Image-Related Distress Among Head and Neck Cancer Survivors. Front Psychol 2021; 12:794038. [PMID: 34956022 PMCID: PMC8702522 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.794038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The Inventory to Measure and Assess imaGe disturbance – Head and Neck (IMAGE-HN) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure of head and neck cancer-related body image-related distress (BID). However, the IMAGE-HN score corresponding to clinically relevant BID is unknown. The study objective is to determine the IMAGE-HN cutoff score that identifies head and neck cancer patients with clinically relevant BID. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study at six academic medical centers. Individuals ≥18 years old with a history of head and neck cancer treated with definitive intent were included. The primary outcome measure was the IMAGE-HN. A Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis was performed to identify the IMAGE-HN score that maximized sensitivity and specificity relative to a Body Image Scale score of ≥10 (which indicates clinically relevant BID in a general oncology population). To confirm the validity of the IMAGE-HN cutoff score, we compared the severity of depressive [Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)] and anxiety symptoms [Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)], and quality of life [University of Washington-QOL (UW-QOL)] in patients with IMAGE-HN scores above and below the cutoff. Results: Of the 250 patients, 70.4% were male and the mean age was 62.3 years. An IMAGE-HN score of ≥22 was the optimal cutoff score relative to a Body Image Scale score of ≥10 and represents a clinically relevant level of head and neck cancer-related BID. Relative to those with an IMAGE-HN score of <22, patients with IMAGE-HN scores of ≥22 had a clinically meaningful increase in symptoms of depression (mean PHQ-9 score difference = 5.8) and anxiety (mean GAD-7 score difference = 4.1) as well as worse physical (mean UW-QOL score difference = 18.9) and social-emotional QOL (mean UW-QOL score difference = 21.5). Using an IMAGE-HN cutoff score ≥22, 28% of patients had clinically relevant BID. Conclusion: An IMAGE-HN score of ≥22 identifies patients with clinically relevant head and neck cancer-related BID. This score may be used to detect patients who could benefit from strategies to manage their distress, select patients for studies evaluating interventions to manage head and neck cancer-related BID, and improve our understanding of the underlying epidemiology of the disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Macias
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Brittany N Hand
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| | - Patrik Pipkorn
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Amy M Williams
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Steven S Chang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, United States
| | - Joseph Zenga
- Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Marci L Nilsen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Bethany A Rhoten
- Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Andrew T Huang
- Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Stacey Maurer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Wendy Balliet
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Hong Li
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Kenneth J Ruggiero
- College of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Katherine R Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Jehn P, Spalthoff S, Lentge F, Zeller AN, Tavassol F, Neuhaus MT, Eckstein FM, Krüskemper G, Gellrich NC, Korn P. Postoperative quality of life and therapy-related impairments of oral cancer in relation to time-distance since treatment. J Cancer Surviv 2021; 16:1366-1378. [PMID: 34609700 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-021-01118-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Oral cancer resection can cause physical and psychological impairments that influence the quality of life (QoL). Depending on the postoperative time-distance, the occurrence and intensity of these impairments may change. We evaluated the sequelae and changes in therapy-related impairments during the postoperative course to detect associations between the time since surgery and the presence of disorders. METHODS Data from a questionnaire completed by 1359 patients who underwent surgical treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma and were involved in a multicenter rehabilitation study of the German-Austrian-Swiss Cooperative Group on Tumors of the Maxillofacial Region (DÖSAK) that included 43 oral and maxillofacial clinics in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS Physical impairments, including those in appearance, mouth opening ability, ability to smell, gastric disorders, mandible mobility, breathing, and shoulder/arm mobility, were significantly associated with and increased with time-distance since surgery. Esthetic appearance most strongly correlated with the highest perception of worsening. Regarding psychological disorders, worry about tumor recurrence, depression, and worse prospects were significantly associated. Among the postoperative sequelae, fear of tumor recurrence decreased continuously; however, depression and worse prospects increased. The general QoL did not significantly differ overall during the postoperative course. CONCLUSIONS Therapy-related impairments change during the postoperative course based on the time-distance since surgery. The general QoL may not markedly vary; however, single impairments, to some extent, can increase or decrease. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Continuous adaptation of supportive cancer therapy is required during follow-up to sufficiently address individual treatment needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Jehn
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Simon Spalthoff
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Fritjof Lentge
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Alexander-Nicolai Zeller
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank Tavassol
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Michael-Tobias Neuhaus
- Department of Oral, Craniomaxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Fabian Matthias Eckstein
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Gertrud Krüskemper
- Department of Medical Psychology, Ruhr University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Nils-Claudius Gellrich
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Philippe Korn
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zebolsky AL, Patel N, Heaton CM, Park AM, Seth R, Knott PD. Patient-Reported Aesthetic and Psychosocial Outcomes After Microvascular Reconstruction for Head and Neck Cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 147:1035-1044. [PMID: 34292310 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.1563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Importance Aesthetic outcomes are key determinants of psychosocial functioning among surgically treated patients with head and neck cancer (HNC); however, long-term aesthetic outcomes after microvascular free tissue transfer (MFTT) are not well described. Objective To examine risk factors for impaired long-term aesthetic satisfaction and appearance-related psychosocial functioning after HNC ablation with MFTT. Design, Setting, and Participants A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted at an academic tertiary care center. A total of 228 individuals who underwent MFTT between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, for treatment of HNC were included. The study was conducted from November 1, 2020, through January 15, 2021. Exposures Head and neck cancer ablation with MFTT. Main Outcomes and Measures Patient-reported outcomes were assessed via Aesthetic FACE-Q scales. The primary objective was aesthetic satisfaction determined by the Satisfaction With Facial Appearance scale. Secondarily, the Appearance-Related Psychosocial Distress, Psychological Function, and Social Function scales were used to assess appearance-related psychosocial functioning. Patients were stratified by demographic, disease, surgical, and postoperative characteristics. Survey scores on a 100-point scale were compared and subjected to univariable and multivariable linear regression. Results A total of 124 of 228 patients (54.4%) completed surveys a median of 34.4 months after MFTT (interquartile range, 22.6-48.8). Most responders (79 [63.7%]) were men with advanced cancer of the oral cavity or skin, reconstructed with anterolateral thigh or osteocutaneous fibula free flaps. Nonresponders had no significant differences in baseline characteristics. The Satisfaction With Facial Appearance score was independently lower among patients who received osteocutaneous flaps (regression coefficient, -10.6 points, 95% CI, -20.4 to -0.8 points) and/or adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (regression coefficient, -6.9 points; 95% CI, -13.8 to -0.1 points). Impaired appearance-related psychosocial functioning was independently associated with female sex, a history of anxiety or depression, osteocutaneous flaps, prolonged tube feeding requirements, and any recurrent or persistent disease. After adjustment for covariates, each 1-point increase in the Satisfaction With Facial Appearance score independently estimated improved appearance-related psychosocial functioning as determined by the Appearance-Related Psychosocial Distress scale (regression coefficient, -0.5 points; 95% CI, -0.7 to -0.4 points), Psychological Function scale (regression coefficient, 0.4 points; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.5 points), and Social Function scale (regression coefficient, 0.4 points; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.6 points). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this cross-sectional, web-based survey study suggest that osteocutaneous reconstruction and adjuvant therapy independently increase the risk of poor patient-reported long-term aesthetic satisfaction, which correlated with impaired appearance-related psychosocial functioning. Aesthetic outcomes appear to be a priority to address in patients with HNC undergoing MFTT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron L Zebolsky
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Neil Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Chase M Heaton
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Andrea M Park
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Rahul Seth
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| | - P Daniel Knott
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Macias D, Hand BN, Maurer S, Balliet W, Ellis MA, Pipkorn P, Huang AT, Nilsen ML, Ruggiero KJ, Williams AM, Marsh CH, Li H, Rhoten BA, Sterba KR, Graboyes EM. Factors Associated With Risk of Body Image-Related Distress in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2021; 147:1019-1026. [PMID: 34236423 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.1378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Importance Body image-related distress (BID) is common among head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors and associated with significant morbidity. Risk factors for HNC-related BID remain poorly characterized because prior research has used outcome measures that fail to fully capture BID as experienced by HNC survivors. Objective To assess the association of demographic and oncologic characteristics with HNC-related BID using the Inventory to Measure and Assess imaGe disturbancE-Head & Neck (IMAGE-HN), a validated, multidomain, patient-reported outcome measure of HNC-related BID. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study assessed 301 adult survivors of surgically managed HNC at 4 academic medical centers. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome measure was IMAGE-HN scores, for which higher scores reflect more severe HNC-related BID. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association of patient characteristics with IMAGE-HN global and 4 subdomain (other-oriented appearance concerns, personal dissatisfaction with appearance, distress with functional impairments, and social avoidance) scores. Results Of the 301 participants (212 [70.4%] male; mean [SD] age, 65.3 [11.7] years), 181 (60.1%) underwent free flap reconstruction. Graduation from college (β = -9.6; 95% CI, -17.5 to -1.7) or graduate school (β = -12.6; 95% CI, -21.2 to -3.8) was associated with lower IMAGE-HN social avoidance scores compared with less than a high school education. Compared with paid work, unemployment was associated with higher IMAGE-HN other-oriented appearance (β = 10.7; 95% CI, 2.0-19.3), personal dissatisfaction with appearance (β = 12.5; 95% CI, 1.2-23.7), and global (β = 8.0; 95% CI, 0.6-15.4) scores. Compared with no reconstruction, free flap reconstruction was associated with higher IMAGE-HN global scores (β = 11.5; 95% CI, 7.9-15.0) and all subdomain scores (other-oriented appearance: β = 13.1; 95% CI, 8.6-17.6; personal dissatisfaction with appearance: β = 15.4; 95% CI, 10.0-20.7; distress with functional impairment: β = 12.8; 95% CI, 8.1-17.4; and social avoidance and isolation: β = 10.2; 95% CI, 5.8-14.6). Higher IMAGE-HN distress with functional impairment scores were found in those who received surgery and adjuvant radiation (β = 7.8; 95% CI, 2.9-12.7) or chemoradiotherapy (β = 6.5; 95% CI, 1.8-11.3) compared with surgery alone. The multivariable regression model accounted for a modest proportion of variance in IMAGE-HN global (R2 = 0.18) and subdomain scores (R2 = 0.20 for other-oriented appearance, 0.14 for personal dissatisfaction with appearance, 0.21 for distress with functional impairment, and 0.13 for social avoidance and isolation). Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study, factors associated with risk of HNC-related BID included free flap reconstruction, lower educational attainment, unemployment, and multiple treatment modalities. These characteristics explain a modest proportion of variance in IMAGE-HN scores, suggesting that other characteristics may be the major risk factors for HNC-related BID and should be explored in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Macias
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Brittany N Hand
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - Stacey Maurer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Wendy Balliet
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Mark A Ellis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Patrik Pipkorn
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Andrew T Huang
- Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Marci L Nilsen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Amy M Williams
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Courtney H Marsh
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Hong Li
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | | | - Katherine R Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zebolsky AL, Ochoa E, Badran KW, Heaton C, Park A, Seth R, Knott PD. Appearance-Related Distress and Social Functioning after Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2021; 131:E2204-E2211. [PMID: 33797087 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS To better understand aesthetic patient-reported outcomes and psychosocial quality of life (QOL) after head and neck microvascular reconstruction for benign or malignant tumors. STUDY DESIGN Single-center prospectively obtained in-office validated questionnaire-based study. METHODS Analysis of prospectively collected surveys at a tertiary care academic center from June 2018 to February 2021. Patients completed two FACE-Q scales: Appearance-Related Psychosocial Distress (ARPD) and Social Function (SF). Survey scores, demographics, operative course, and adjuvant therapy data underwent univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS One hundred and three patients completed surveys at a median of 13.5 months postoperatively (interquartile range: 5.2-30.8). Mean ARPD from 0 (no distress) to 100 (maximum distress) was 32.4 (standard error of the mean [SEM]: 2.7). Mean SF from 0 (worst functioning) to 100 (best functioning) was 55.5 (SEM: 2.7). Postoperative adjuvant radiation was associated with 13.9% higher ARPD (95% CI: 3.4-24.4, P = .019) and 10.4% lower SF (95% CI: -20.7 to -0.1, P = .047). Each appearance-related question on the ARPD scale independently predicted impaired SF (P < .001 for all questions). Upon multivariable logistic regression, osteocutaneous reconstruction, compared to soft tissue alone (P = .043), and postoperative adjuvant radiation (P = .014) were associated with higher levels of ARPD. Age, sex, relationship status, anxiety or depression history, defect location, and hospital stay were not significantly associated with ARPD or SF scores. CONCLUSIONS Aesthetic outcomes are important determinants of psychosocial QOL following head and neck microvascular reconstruction: an effect that is worsened by adjuvant radiation. Reconstructive surgeons should prioritize aesthetic outcomes, in addition to functional restoration, to optimize social functioning in patients with head and neck tumors. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 131:E2204-E2211, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron L Zebolsky
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Edgar Ochoa
- School of Medicine, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Karam W Badran
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Chase Heaton
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Andrea Park
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - Rahul Seth
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| | - P Daniel Knott
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, California, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Graboyes EM, Maurer S, Park Y, Marsh CH, McElligott JT, Day TA, Hornig JD, Sterba KR. Evaluation of a novel telemedicine-based intervention to manage body image disturbance in head and neck cancer survivors. Psychooncology 2020; 29:1988-1994. [PMID: 32350999 PMCID: PMC7606304 DOI: 10.1002/pon.5399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary clinical impact of BRIGHT (Building a Renewed ImaGe after Head & neck cancer Treatment), a novel telemedicine-based cognitive-behavioral intervention to manage body image disturbance (BID) in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors. METHODS Head and neck cancer survivors with BID were enrolled into a single-arm pilot trial. Participants completed study measures at baseline, 1- and 3-months post-BRIGHT to assess its acceptability and clinical impact. Participants completed semi-structured interviews to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of BRIGHT and refine the intervention. RESULTS Ten HNC survivors with BID were enrolled into the trial of tablet-based BRIGHT. BRIGHT was feasible, as judged by low dropout (n = 1), high session completion rates (100%; 45/45) and low rates of technical issues with the tablet-based delivery (11% minor; 0% major). Ninety percent of participants were highly likely to recommend BRIGHT, reflecting its acceptability. BRIGHT was associated with a 34.5% reduction in mean Body Image Scale scores at 1-month post-BRIGHT (mean difference from baseline = 4.56; 95% CI 1.55, 7.56), an effect that was durable at 3-months post-BRIGHT (mean decrease from baseline = 3.56; 95% CI 1.15-5.96). Program evaluation revealed high levels of satisfaction with BRIGHT, particularly the delivery platform. During the qualitative evaluation, participants highlighted that BRIGHT improved image-related coping behavior. CONCLUSIONS BRIGHT is feasible, acceptable to HNC survivors, and has significant potential as a novel approach to manage BID in HNC survivors. Additional research is necessary to refine BRIGHT and evaluate its clinical efficacy and scalability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M. Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC
- Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC
| | - Stacey Maurer
- Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, MUSC
| | - Yeonhee Park
- Hollings Cancer Center, MUSC
- Department of Public Health Sciences, MUSC
| | - Courtney H. Marsh
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC
| | | | - Terry A. Day
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC
| | - Joshua D. Hornig
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Charleston, SC
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Melissant HC, Jansen F, Eerenstein SE, Cuijpers P, Laan E, Lissenberg-Witte BI, Schuit AS, Sherman KA, Leemans CR, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM. Body image distress in head and neck cancer patients: what are we looking at? Support Care Cancer 2020; 29:2161-2169. [PMID: 32885315 PMCID: PMC7892513 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05725-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of the present study is to investigate the prevalence of body image distress among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients after treatment and to examine its association with sociodemographic and clinical factors, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), HNC symptoms, sexuality, self-compassion, and psychological distress. Second, we aim to explore daily life experiences of HNC patients regarding body image. METHODS A cross-sectional survey among HNC patients investigated the prevalence of body image distress based on the Body Image Scale. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to study associations with sociodemographic and clinical factors, HRQOL (EORTC QLQ-C30), HNC symptoms (QLQ-HN43), sexuality (FSFI-6; IIEF-5), self-compassion (SCS-SF), and psychological distress (HADS). Qualitative data from a body image writing intervention was used to explore experiences in daily life related to body image. RESULTS Body image distress was prevalent in 13-20% (depending on cut-off scores) of 233 HNC patients. Symptoms of depression (p < 0.001), younger age (p < 0.001), problems with social contact (p = 0.001), problems with wound healing (p = 0.013), and larger extent of surgery (p = 0.014) were associated with having body image distress. This model explained 67% of variance. Writing interventions of 40 HNC patients showed that negative body image experiences were related to appearance and function, with social functioning problems described most often. CONCLUSION Prevalence of body image distress in HNC patients, using different cut-off scores, is 13-20%. Younger patients, patients after extensive surgery, and patients who had wound healing problems are most at risk. There is a significant association between body image distress and depressive symptoms and social functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H C Melissant
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Cancer Center Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, Amsterdam, MB, Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F Jansen
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Cancer Center Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, Amsterdam, MB, Netherlands. .,Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - S E Eerenstein
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Cancer Center Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, Amsterdam, MB, Netherlands
| | - P Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Laan
- Department of Sexology and Psychosomatic OBGYN, Amsterdam UMC, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B I Lissenberg-Witte
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A S Schuit
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - K A Sherman
- Centre for Emotional Health, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | - C R Leemans
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Cancer Center Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, Amsterdam, MB, Netherlands
| | - I M Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Cancer Center Amsterdam, P.O. Box 7057, 1007, Amsterdam, MB, Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Behavioral and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Graboyes EM, Hand BN, Ellis MA, Huang AT, Nilsen ML, Pipkorn P, Marsh CH, Maurer S, Day TA, Sterba KR. Validation of a Novel, Multidomain Head and Neck Cancer Appearance- and Function-Distress Patient-Reported Outcome Measure. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 163:979-985. [PMID: 32482151 DOI: 10.1177/0194599820927364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Distress with self-perceived changes in appearance and function can result in body image disturbance (BID), which is common in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors and a major source of psychosocial morbidity. To address the lack of psychometrically sound patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of HNC-related BID, we aim to create and validate the Inventory to Measure and Assess imaGe disturbancE-Head & Neck (IMAGE-HN). STUDY DESIGN Survey study. SETTING Multiple academic centers. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Following item development, HNC survivors from 4 academic centers completed the IMAGE-HN. Item responses were psychometrically analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch analysis. RESULTS Item development resulted in a 31-item PROM consisting of 5 individual domains and a global domain. In total, 305 HNC survivors of diverse ages, HNC subsites, and reconstructive paradigms completed the initial items. After removal of 3 items for local dependence, CFA confirmed the unidimensionality and local independence (item residual correlations <|0.20|) for each domain. Rasch analysis indicated acceptable fit (infit and outfit mean squares <2.0), monotonicity of all rating scale categories, and low person misfit (<4%). Person separation indices and person reliability were adequate for each domain except appearance concealment, which was removed (4 items). This resulted in the IMAGE-HN, a psychometrically acceptable 24-item PROM of HNC-related BID consisting of a global scale and 4 subscales measuring unique constructs and comprised independent items. CONCLUSIONS IMAGE-HN is a novel, psychometrically sound, multidomain PROM of HNC-related BID for use in clinical and research settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.,Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Brittany N Hand
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Mark A Ellis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Andrew T Huang
- Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Marci L Nilsen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Patrik Pipkorn
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Courtney H Marsh
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Stacey Maurer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Terry A Day
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Katherine R Sterba
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Graboyes EM, Hill EG, Marsh CH, Maurer S, Day TA, Hornig JD, Lentsch EJ, Neskey DM, Skoner J, Sterba KR. Temporal Trajectory of Body Image Disturbance in Patients with Surgically Treated Head and Neck Cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2020; 162:304-312. [PMID: 31906788 DOI: 10.1177/0194599819898861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To characterize the temporal trajectory of body image disturbance (BID) in patients with surgically treated head and neck cancer (HNC). STUDY DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING Academic medical center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Patients with HNC who were undergoing surgery completed the Body Image Scale (BIS), a validated patient-reported outcome measure of BID, pretreatment and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months posttreatment. Changes in BIS scores (ΔBIS) relative to pretreatment (primary endpoint) were analyzed with a linear mixed model. Associations between demographics, clinical characteristics, psychosocial attributes, and persistently elevated BIS scores and increases in BIS scores ≥5 points relative to pretreatment (secondary endpoints) were analyzed through logistic regression. RESULTS Of the 68 patients, most were male (n = 43), had oral cavity cancer (n = 37), and underwent microvascular reconstruction (n = 45). Relative to baseline, mean ΔBIS scores were elevated at 1 month postoperatively (2.9; 95% CI, 1.3-4.4) and 3 (3.2; 95% CI, 1.5-4.9) and 6 (1.8; 95% CI, 0.02-3.6) months posttreatment before returning to baseline at 9 months posttreatment (0.9; 95% CI, -0.8 to 2.5). Forty-three percent of patients (19 of 44) had persistently elevated BIS scores at 9 months posttreatment relative to baseline, and 51% (31 of 61) experienced an increase in BIS scores ≥5 relative to baseline. CONCLUSIONS In this cohort of patients surgically treated for HNC, BID worsens posttreatment before returning to pretreatment (baseline) levels at 9 months posttreatment. However, 4 in 10 patients will experience a protracted course with persistent posttreatment body image concerns, and half will experience a significant increase in BIS scores relative to pretreatment levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.,Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Elizabeth G Hill
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Courtney H Marsh
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Stacey Maurer
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.,Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Terry A Day
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Joshua D Hornig
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Eric J Lentsch
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - David M Neskey
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.,Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Judith Skoner
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Katherine R Sterba
- Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.,Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Sandulache VC, Lei YL, Heasley LE, Chang M, Amos CI, Sturgis EM, Graboyes E, Chiao EY, Rogus-Pulia N, Lewis J, Madabhushi A, Frederick MJ, Sabichi A, Ittmann M, Yarbrough WG, Chung CH, Ferrarotto R, Mai W, Skinner HD, Duvvuri U, Gerngross P, Sikora AG. Innovations in risk-stratification and treatment of Veterans with oropharynx cancer; roadmap of the 2019 Field Based Meeting. Oral Oncol 2019; 102:104440. [PMID: 31648864 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- V C Sandulache
- Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States; ENT Section, Operative Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, United States.
| | - Y L Lei
- Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - L E Heasley
- Department of Craniofacial Biology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States; Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO, United States
| | - M Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hunter Holmes McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - C I Amos
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - E M Sturgis
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - E Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States; Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - E Y Chiao
- Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States; Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - N Rogus-Pulia
- Speech Pathology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison, WI, United States; William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI, United States
| | - J Lewis
- Department of Pathology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - A Madabhushi
- Department of Pathology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States; Louis Stokes Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - M J Frederick
- Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - A Sabichi
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States; Medical Care Line, Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - M Ittmann
- Department of Pathology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States; Department of Pathology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - W G Yarbrough
- Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - C H Chung
- Department of Head and Neck-Endocrine Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - R Ferrarotto
- Department of Thoracic Head and Neck Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Weiyuan Mai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States; Department of Radiation Oncology, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - H D Skinner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - U Duvvuri
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; ENT Section, Operative Care Line, Pittsburgh Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - P Gerngross
- Dental Service Line, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - A G Sikora
- Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States; ENT Section, Operative Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, United States.
| |
Collapse
|