Evaluating a Prototype Nasolaryngoscopy Hood During Aerosol-Generating Procedures in Otolaryngology

Particle scattering during otolaryngological examinations

PURPOSE

We aimed to analyze particle scattering during common otolaryngology examination procedures which are associated with aerosol-generating procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted with 109 volunteer patients who have participated between October 2020 and January 2021. We measured aerosol and droplet production during oropharyngeal examination, anterior rhinoscopy, rigid nasopharyngoscopy, and rigid laryngoscopy. Measurements were calculated at the beginning of the examinations and during the otolaryngological examination procedures.

RESULTS

There was no significant increase when we compared the particle scattering in each examination procedure with the basal measurements. But at the end of all examination methods for each patient, there was a significant increase at each micrometer. When all examination methods are compared with each other, particle increases in the oropharyngeal examination with larger particle sizes than 0,5 μm were found to be higher than other examination methods. We analyzed six patients' measurements, who coughed, gagged, or sneezed during the nasal endoscopy procedure, there was a significant increase in terms of 0,3 μm particle scattering.

CONCLUSION

When all examination methods are performed together, there is a significant particle increase in all particle sizes in the examination room at the end of the examinations. This causes otolaryngologists to be exposed to a significant particle increase at each micrometer. Because of this reason, otolaryngologists should be careful and should wear personal protective equipment while examining patients.

COVID-19 in the Clinic: Aerosol Containment Mask for Endoscopic Otolaryngologic Clinic Procedures

Objective

To create an aerosol containment mask (ACM) that contains aerosols during common otolaryngologic endoscopic procedures while protecting patients from environmental aerosols.

Study Design

Bench testing.

Setting

Mannequin testing.

Methods

The mask was designed in SolidWorks and 3-dimensional printed. Mannequins were fitted with a nebulizer to generate aerosols. Commercial particle counters were used to measure mask performance.

Results

The ACM has 2 ports on either side for instruments and endoscopes, a port for a filter, and a port that can evacuate aerosols contained within the mask via a standard suction pump. The mask contained aerosols on a mannequin with and without facial hair when the suction was set to 18.5 L/min. Other types of masks demonstrated substantial aerosol leakage under similar conditions. In a subsequent experiment, the ACM contained aerosols generated by a nebulizer up to the saturation of the particle detector without measurable leakage with or without suction.

Conclusion

The ACM will accommodate rigid and flexible endoscopes plus instruments and prevent leakage of patient-generated aerosols, thus avoiding contamination of the room and protecting health care workers from airborne contagions.

Level of evidence

2.

Visual Analysis of Swallowing Efficiency and Safety (VASES): A Standardized Approach to Rating Pharyngeal Residue, Penetration, and Aspiration During FEES

The primary aim of this study was to describe the development of the Visual Analysis of Swallowing Efficiency and Safety (VASES)-a standardized method to rate pharyngeal residue, penetration, and aspiration during FEES. As a secondary aim, we explored the feasibility of training novices to interpret FEES using VASES. Literature review and consensus panel discussions were used to develop standardized rules for VASES. A training protocol was developed and criterion ratings were established. Twenty-five novice raters completed VASES training and pre-/post-training assessments. Statistical analyses were used to examine pre- to post-training differences in the accuracy, reliability, and time to rate each video clip using VASES. Four sets of VASES rules were developed, including 'what', 'where', 'when', and 'how' to rate FEES. Large, significant post-training improvements in rating accuracy were observed across all seven VASES outcome measures (Cohen's d range 0.74-1.59). Additionally, inter-rater reliability increased for four of the seven outcome measures, and the amount of time to rate each video clip decreased from 2.6 min pre-training to 1.5 min post-training. VASES is a standardized FEES rating method used to enhance the subjective analysis of pharyngeal residue, penetration, and aspiration. It can be feasibly taught to novice raters with a high level of success and may be an effective method to analyze swallowing safety and efficiency in clinical and research practices. Future research is needed to test the validity of VASES by examining its relationship with other validated FEES rating scales.