Primary Surgical Treatment in Very Advanced (T4b) Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinomas

Primary site surgical resection in cM1 oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma

Objective

To investigate primary site surgical resection and overall survival (OS) in clinically distantly metastatic (cM1) oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC).

Methods

The 2006-2018 National Cancer Database was queried for patients presenting with cM1 OCSCC who underwent chemotherapy. Binary logistic, Kaplan-Meier, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were implemented.

Results

Of 278 patients satisfying inclusion criteria, 139 (50.0%) underwent chemotherapy alone, 80 (28.8%) underwent chemoradiotherapy, 25 (9.0%) underwent surgical resection + adjuvant chemotherapy, and 34 (12.2%) underwent surgical resection + adjuvant chemoradiotherapy; 5-year OS was 9.4%, 15.2%, 8.3%, and 23.8%, respectively (p < .001). Compared with those not undergoing surgical resection, patients undergoing surgical resection underwent radiotherapy more frequently (57.6% vs. 36.5%) but multiple-agent chemotherapy less frequently (40.7% vs. 74.4%) (p < .005). Twenty-one (36.2%) patients undergoing surgical resection had positive surgical margins. Academic facility (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.19, 95% CI 1.54-6.62) and Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score ≥1 (aOR 2.82, 95% CI 1.25-6.32, p < .025) were associated with increased odds of undergoing surgical resection. Compared with chemotherapy alone, chemoradiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.56, 95% CI 0.38-0.83) and surgical resection + adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (aHR 0.37, 95% CI 0.21-0.66) were associated with higher OS (p < .005). Immunotherapy (aHR 0.48, 95% CI 0.28-0.81, p = .006) was also independently associated with higher OS.

Conclusion

A minority of patients with cM1 OCSCC underwent primary site surgical resection. Despite the high rate of positive surgical margins, surgical resection + adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was associated with higher OS than chemotherapy alone, chemoradiotherapy, or surgical resection + adjuvant chemotherapy. Definitive local therapy may benefit select patients with cM1 OCSCC.Level of evidence: 4.

Surgical Resection Improves Overall Survival in cT4b Major Salivary Gland Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare surgical and nonsurgical definitive treatment in cT4b major salivary gland cancer (MSGC).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

The 2004 to 2019 National Cancer Database.

METHODS

The NCDB was queried for patients with cT4b MSGC (N = 976). Patients undergoing definitive treatment with (1) surgical resection + adjuvant therapy, (2) radiotherapy (RT) alone, or (3) chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were included in Kaplan-Meier and Cox survival analyses.

RESULTS

Of 219 patients undergoing definitive treatment, 148 (67.6%) underwent surgical resection + adjuvant therapy and 71 (32.4%) underwent RT or CRT. There were no documented mortalities within 90 days of surgical resection. Tumor diameter and nodal metastasis were associated with decreased odds of undergoing definitive treatment (P < 0.025). Patients with positive surgical margins (PSM) had higher 5-year overall survival (OS) than those undergoing definitive RT or CRT (48.5% vs 30.1%, P = 0.018) and similar 5-year OS as those with negative margins (48.5% vs 54.0%, P = 0.205). Surgical resection + adjuvant therapy (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37-0.84) was associated with higher OS than definitive RT or CRT (P < 0.025). A separate cohort of 961 patients with cT4a tumors undergoing surgical resection + adjuvant therapy was created; cT4a and cT4b (hazard ratio: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.80-1.29, P = 0.896) tumors had similar OS.

CONCLUSION

A minority of patients with cT4b MSGC undergo definitive treatment. Surgical resection + adjuvant therapy was safe and associated with higher OS than definitive RT or CRT, despite high rate of PSM. In the absence of clinical trial data, appropriately selected patients with cT4b MSGC may benefit from surgical resection.

A Meta-analysis of Surgical Outcomes of T4a and Infranotch T4b Oral Cancers

OBJECTIVE

To determine the overall surgical outcomes of infranotch T4b oral cancers and compare them with T4a oral cancers.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases from 2000 to 2022 were systematically searched. Clinical studies reporting at least one outcome following curative surgery and adjuvant therapy for comparison of patients with either infranotch T4b (IN-T4b) or T4a tumour. The heterogeneity of the included studies was determined using Tau-squared, Chi-squared, and the Higgins I2 test. The random effects model was used to determine the log odds ratio (logOR).

RESULTS

The systematic review comprised 11,790 patients from 16 included studies. Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis (n = 11,381). For IN-T4b patients, the pooled 2 and 5 year overall survival (OS) were 59.3% and 53.2%, 2 and 5 year disease-free survival (DFS) 57.9% and 48.4%, 2 and 5 year disease-specific survival (DSS) 72% and 68%, and 2 and 5 year local control (LC), 47% and 56%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in 2 year OS [logOR = 0.28 (-0.47, 1.03), p = 0.46, confidence interval (CI) = 95%], 5 year OS [logOR = 0.7 (-0.4, 1.8), p = 0.54, CI = 95%], 2 year DFS [logOR = 0.22 (-0.35, 0.79), p = 0.45, CI = 95%], 5 year DFS [logOR = 0.17 (-0.42, 0.77), p = 0.57, CI = 95%], 2 year LC [logOR = 0.47 (-0.33, 1.26), p = 0.25, CI = 95%] and 5 year LC [logOR = 0.34 (-0.31, 0.99), p = 0.31, CI = 95%] between IN-T4b and T4a oral cancers.

CONCLUSION

Results of this meta-analysis suggest that IN-T4b oral cancers have similar outcomes to T4a oral cancers, which supports down-staging IN-T4b cancers to T4a cancers.

Enbloc resection of primary oral cancer involving infratemporal fossa: A systematic "out to in and top to bottom" surgical approach and outcomes

AIM AND INTRODUCTION

The oral cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OCSCC) involving infratemporal fossa (ITF) is considered as cT4b stage per AJCC 8th classification. The treatment of these group of patients is challenging due to the difficulty in achieving negative resection margin status. In this study we have highlighted our surgical technique with oncological outcome of enbloc resection of primary oral cancer involving ITF.

METHODOLOGY

- This was a single center retrospective study which included only patients with OCSCC extending into ITF. Our surgical technique of systematic "out to in and top to bottom" approach was detailed. The perioperative outcomes, histopathological details, survival outcomes were measured.

RESULTS

- Over the period of 1 year a total of 340 patients with OCSCC reported to our outpatient department, out of which 120 patients belonged to cT4 category and 32 patients were cT4b stage with involvement of ITF. Amongst 32 patients, 2 patients had distant metastasis and were excluded from the study. The 5 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery and rest all patients were taken up for upfront curative surgery. There were no significant intraoperative and postoperative complications. None of the margins were found to be involved or close in the final histopathology report. The median DFS and OS were 31 months and 27 months respectively at a median follow up of 29 months.

CONCLUSION

- Our systematic approach of enbloc resection of primary oral cancer involving ITF is safe and easily reproducible with high rate of negative resection margin status.

Oncological outcomes and prognostic factors of squamous cell carcinoma of the upper gingiva and hard palate: a retrospective study

PURPOSE

Despite sharing the same staging system as oral cavity cancers, upper gingiva and hard palate (UGHP) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) have several features that make them a different entity. We aimed to analyze oncological outcomes and adverse prognostic factors of UGHP SCC, and assess an alternate T classification specific to UGHP SCC.

METHODS

Retrospective bicentric study including all patients treated by surgery for a UGHP SCC between 2006 and 2021.

RESULTS

We included 123 patients with a median age of 75 years. After a median follow-up of 45 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and local control (LC) were 57.3%, 52.7% and 74.7%, respectively. Perineural invasion, tumor size, bone invasion, pT classification and pN classification were statistically associated with poorer OS, DFS and LC on univariate analysis. On multivariable analysis, the following variable were statistically associated with a poorer OS: past history of HN radiotherapy (p = 0.018), age > 70 years (p = 0.005), perineural invasions (p = 0.019) and bone invasion (p = 0.030). Median survivals after isolated local recurrence were 17.7 and 3 months in case of surgical and non-surgical treatment, respectively (p = 0.066). The alternate classification allowed better patient distribution among T-categories, however without improving prognostication.

CONCLUSION

There is a broad variety of clinical and pathological factors influencing prognosis of SCC of the UGHP. A comprehensive knowledge of their prognostic factors may pave the way towards a specific and more appropriate classification for these tumors.

Clinico pathological characteristics and survival outcome in oral cavity cancer with masticator space involvement (T4b) - A single institutional experience

INTRODUCTION

Oral cavity cancer with the masticator space involvement is considered as very advanced localised diseas e and staged as T4b in AJCC 8th edition. NCCN guidelines consider this as inoperable. This study intends to compare the different treatment modalities in T4b oral cavity cancer and their impact on survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 150 patients with T4b oral cavity ca, from 2013to 2015 and follow up data till 31 st July 2019 were collected. All patients had biopsy proven SCC and CT evidence of masticator space involvement.

RESULTS

Total of 150 patients were included. 102 patients had received curative treatment and 48 patients had received palliative treatment. In the curative group 84% were treated with surgery and adjuvant treatment and remaining had received RT with or without chemotherapy. 90% patients in the surgically treated group had attained margin negative resection. 4 year OS in the curatively treated group was 58.9% and in the palliative group was 12%. The surgically treated patients in the curative arm had a significant survival advantage over the patients who had received only RT with or without chemotherapy, (63.5% v/s 34%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Curatively treated oral cavity cancer with masticator space involvement has survival outcome comparable to the published survival data of those without masticator space involvement. Radical intent treatment, preferably surgery should be offered to all patients with masticator space involvement, if negative margin is anticipated from preoperative imaging.

Surgical outcomes of T4b oral cancers: assessment of prognostic factors and a need to re-evaluate the current staging system

T4b oral cancer is a broad umbrella term for all advanced oral cancers, the prognosis of which varies drastically for disease of the same stage, according to the extent of the masticator space involvement. This was a retrospective observational study including all consecutive T4b oral squamous cell carcinoma patients treated surgically between January 2015 and January 2016 and followed up until January 2020. The disease was classified as upper disease or lower disease based on the anatomical location in relation to an imaginary plane passing through the base of the retromolar trigone. The prime objective was to evaluate overall survival and prognostic factors affecting overall survival. The projected 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 40.7% and 35.6%, respectively. The assessment of prognostic factors revealed that lower disease (lower anatomical subsites), bone invasion, and lymph nodal spread significantly affected survival. Patients with disease in an upper anatomical location without bone and nodal involvement can achieve fairly good survival (projected 5-year overall survival of 64.2%) when compared to the other subsets of patients. We propose a re-evaluation of the current staging system based on the prognostic features, so that all patients are not considered under a single stage, since their survival differs significantly.

Surgical Treatment in Very Advanced (T4b) Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

OBJECTIVE

To compare treatment outcomes for T4b head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC).

STUDY DESIGN

Historical cohort study.

SETTING

National Cancer Database (NCDB).

METHODS

Identified all T4b ACC of head and neck origin diagnosed 2004 to 2019 in the NCDB. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment details, and survival were analyzed. Treatment outcomes were analyzed using univariable and multivariable Cox regression.

RESULTS

We identified 606 cases of T4b ACC. Less than half (284, 47.0%) underwent curative-intent treatment. Among these, most were treated with primary surgery: surgery + radiotherapy (RT) (122, 43.0%) or surgery + chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (42, 14.8%). The positive margin rate was 78.7%, and 90-day postoperative mortality was zero. Nonsurgical patients were treated with definitive RT (60, 21.1%) or definitive CRT (60, 21.1%). The median follow-up was 51.5 months. Overall survival was 77.8% at 3 years. Three-year survival was higher for patients treated with surgery compared to those treated nonsurgically (84% vs 70%; p = .005). Surgical treatment remained associated with higher survival on multivariable analysis (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.47, p = .005). This effect was most pronounced for oral cavity tumors (HR: 0.17, p = .01). Among matched cohorts of surgically treated patients, there was no difference in 3-year survival between clinical T4a and T4b tumors (83.3% vs 83.0%, p = .99).

CONCLUSION

Long-term survival for T4b ACC of the head and neck could be expected. Primary surgical treatments can be performed safely and are associated with longer survival. A carefully selected subset of patients with very advanced ACC might benefit from the consideration of surgical treatments.

Surgical treatment and prognosis of posteriorly invading oral cancer: Potential clinical significance of pterygomandibular raphe

Background/purpose

The prognosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) with posterior invasion is poor. We examined whether the pterygomandibular raphe (PMR) is useful for the diagnosis of invasion and determination of surgical methods.

Materials and methods

Of 390 patients with OSCC treated surgically at our hospital between June 2009 and June 2020, 80 patients with posterior invasion were included in the study. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was used to classify the lesions into three types: non-contact with PMR (non-contact type), contact with PMR (contact type), and invasion beyond PMR (invasion type). We compared the local control, recurrence, and survival rates of each of the three types.

Results

The invasion type showed a significantly higher recurrence rate than the non-contact type (P < 0.001) and contact type (P = 0.018). Overall survival rate comparisons showed that the invasion type had significantly worse prognosis than the non-contact (P = 0.004) and contact types (P = 0.041).

Conclusion

OSCCs with posterior invasion beyond the PMR showed a poor treatment outcome and, therefore, should be treated with caution. The initial surgery is especially important and must ensure local control. This study indicates that the PMR is an important criterion for surgical method determination and that invasion beyond the PMR is a predictor of local recurrence and poor prognosis.

The application of salvage surgery improves the quality of life and overall survival of extensively recurrent head and neck cancer after multiple operation plus radiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

The prognosis, choice of reconstruction and the quality of life (QOL) after salvage surgery (SS) for extensively locoregional recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer (R/M HNC) is an important issue, but there are few reports at present.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed extensively locoregional R/M HNC patients from March 1, 2015, to December 31, 2021 who underwent SS with latissimus dorsi or pectoralis major musculocutaneous flaps. QOL were accessed using QLQ-H&N35 and UW-QOL questionnaire. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare difference between pre- and post-QOL and Kaplan-Meier curves were used in estimate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The literature review summarized recent 10 years clinical trials of nonoperative treatment in R/M head and neck cancer.

RESULTS

1362 patients were identified and 25 patients were analyzed after screened. Median age at surgery was 59 years (range 43-77), 15/25(60%) were male and 22/25(88%) chose latissimus dorsi flap. Better mean pain score after applying massive soft tissue flaps revealed relief of severe pain(p<0.001) which strongly associated with improvement of QOL. The improved mean overall QOL score after surgery revealed a better QOL(p<0.001). As of June 1, 2022, 11/25 (44%) of the patients were alive. The 1-year, 2-year OS after SS was 58.4% and 37.2%, while the 1-year, 2-year DFS was 26.2% and 20.9%. The median OS of our study was better than nonoperative treatment of 11 included clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

R/M HNC patients underwent SS can obtain survival benefit. The application of massive soft tissue flap in SS could significantly enhance the QOL for patients with extensively locoregional R/M HNC, especially by relieving severe pain.

Adding Concomitant Chemotherapy to Postoperative Radiotherapy in Oral Cavity Carcinoma with Minor Risk Factors: Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

When presenting with major pathological risk factors, adjuvant radio-chemotherapy for oral cavity cancers (OCC) is recommended, but the addition of chemotherapy to radiotherapy (POCRT) when only minor pathological risk factors are present is controversial. A systematic review following the PICO-PRISMA methodology (PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42021267498) was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries. Studies assessing outcomes of POCRT in patients with solely minor risk factors (perineural invasion or lymph vascular invasion; pN1 single; DOI ≥ 5 mm; close margin < 2−5 mm; node-positive level IV or V; pT3 or pT4; multiple lymph nodes without ENE) were evaluated. A meta-analysis technique with a single-arm study was performed. Radiotherapy was combined with chemotherapy in all studies. One study only included patients treated with POCRT. In the other 12 studies, patients were treated with only PORT (12,883 patients) and with POCRT (10,663 patients). Among the patients treated with POCRT, the pooled 3 year OS rate was 72.9% (95%CI: 65.5−79.2%); the pooled 3 year DFS was 70.9% (95%CI: 48.8−86.2%); and the pooled LRFS was 69.8% (95%CI: 46.1−86.1%). Results are in favor of POCRT in terms of OS but not significant for DFS and LRFS, probably due to the heterogeneity of the included studies and a combination of different prognostic factors.

Oral squamous cell carcinoma – clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes in a single institution retrospective cohort study

<b>Introduction:</b> Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a common malignancy with high morbidity and mortality. </br></br> <b>Aim:</b> The aim of this study was to analyze the data of patients treated for malignant tumours of the oral cavity at the Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, and Laryngological Oncology Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz between 2003–2011 to asses the influence of risk factors on survival in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. </br></br> <b> Material and methods:</b> Material was collected from 62 patients treated for oral SCC between 2003–2011. Forty-three were men (69.35%) with a mean age of 56.33 years. The medical records were analysed, especially history, operative reports, histopathology reports, survival, adjuvant treatment and recurrence. </br></br> <b>Results:</b> All patients underwent surgical treatment (33.87% also had partial removal of the lower jaw, 67.74% adjuvant radio-therapy, 11.29% radiochemotherapy). More than half reported to the doctor within 6 to 15 weeks from the onset of symptoms. The majority smoked and drank alcohol (96.32%). Five-year disease specific survival (DSS) was 68.69%. </br></br> <b>Conclusions:</b> The age over 65 did not significantly influence DSS. The location on the anterior two thirds of the tongue gave the best outcome, while the worst outcome was observed in the retromandibular triangle area which was statistically almost significant (p = 0.06843). In the case of higher degrees of local and regional advancement and a higher stadium, a worse out-come was recorded. Positive surgical margins were identified in 11.29% of the cases, but they had no impact on the results of treatment. No worsening of the outcome was proven for the patients who reported to the doctor later than 15 weeks following the occurrence of symptoms.

Clinical outcomes of patients with pT4a and pT4b oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma who had undergone surgery: Results from a Taiwanese registry-based, nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVES

While the NCCN guidelines maintain that T4b oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) should undergo either non-surgical treatments or clinical trials, promising outcomes of T4b OCSCC having surgical excision have been reported. We analyzed and compared the clinical outcomes of Taiwanese patients with pT4a and pT4b OCSCC who had undergone surgical treatment.

METHODS

From 2011 to 2017, a total of 4031 and 355 patients with first primary pT4a and pT4b OCSCC were identified. A propensity score (PS)-matched analysis of patients (n = 351 each) for pT4a and pT4b tumors was also performed.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-specific and overall survival (DSS/OS) rates were more favorable in patients with pT4a than in those with pT4b OCSCC (64%/55%, p < 0.0001; 55%/43%, p < 0.0001, respectively). Compared with pT4a, those with pT4b tumors had a higher burden of the following risk factors: buccal/retromolar/hard palate subsite, male sex, depth ≥ 10 mm, and positive margins. Before PS matching, multivariable analyses revealed that pT4b tumors (versus pT4a) were an adverse prognosticator for both 5-year DSS and OS (hazard ratios: 1.32 and 1.39, respectively). However, in the PS-matched cohort, no significant differences in 5-year DSS and OS rates were observed between pT4a and pT4b OCSCC (57%/56%, p = 0.4024; 48%/44%, p = 0.1807, respectively) CONCLUSIONS: No significant outcome differences were evident between pT4b and pT4a OCSCC after PS matching. The most plausible hypothesis for the observed survival difference between T4a and T4b tumors is that it was driven by positive margins. We suggest that T4b OCSCC should undergo initial surgical excision if adequate resection is possible.