Dizziness Diagnostic Pathways: Factors Impacting Setting, Provider, and Diagnosis at Presentation

Association of Symptomatic Dizziness With All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality

Importance

Dizziness is a highly prevalent complaint with wide-ranging causes and resultant morbidity. Whether symptomatic dizziness and its various manifestations are associated with all-cause and cause-specific mortality is unknown.

Objective

To examine the associations of symptomatic dizziness and its manifestations with all-cause and cause-specific mortality.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study is a mortality follow-up study based on the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The study cohort included adults 40 years and older who completed questions about symptomatic dizziness, including problems with dizziness, balance, falling, and positional dizziness, within the past 12 months. Respondents were linked to mortality data through December 31, 2019. Data were analyzed from February to August 2023.

Exposure

Self-reported symptomatic dizziness.

Main Outcomes and Measures

All-cause and cause-specific (cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer, and unintentional injuries) mortality. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to examine associations between symptomatic dizziness and all-cause and cause-specific mortality while adjusting for demographics and medical history.

Results

In this nationally representative cohort of 9000 middle-aged and older US adults (mean [SD] age, 61.8 [13.8] years; 4570 [50.8%] female), prevalence of symptomatic dizziness was 23.8%. Specifically, 18.3% reported problems with dizziness, 14.5% reported problems with balance, 5.7% reported problems with falling, and 3.8% reported dizziness when turning in bed (positional dizziness). At a median (range) of 16.2 (0.1-20.6) years of follow-up, all-cause mortality for adults with symptomatic dizziness was higher than for those without (45.6% vs 27.1%). Symptomatic dizziness was associated with elevated risk for cause-specific mortality from diabetes (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; 95% CI, 1.23-2.25), cardiovascular disease (HR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.12-1.55), and cancer (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.99-1.47) but not unintentional injuries (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.51-1.88). Reporting problems with balance or falling was associated with increased all-cause mortality (balance: HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.17-1.39; and falling: HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.33-1.73), cardiovascular disease-specific mortality (balance: HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.20-1.66; and falling: HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.15-1.94), and diabetes-specific mortality risks (balance: HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.26-2.39; and falling: HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.26-3.18). There was no association between positional dizziness and mortality (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.82-1.19).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, symptomatic dizziness was associated with increased risk for all-cause and diabetes-, cardiovascular disease-, and cancer-specific mortality. The imprecision of the effect size estimate for cancer-specific mortality prevents making a definitive conclusion. Future studies are needed to determine whether symptomatic dizziness indicates underlying health conditions contributing to mortality or if early intervention for imbalance and falls can reduce mortality risk.

Use of Physical Therapy and Subsequent Falls Among Patients With Dizziness in the US

Importance

Among adults who present for clinical evaluation of dizziness, there is a critical need to identify interventions, such as physical therapy (PT), to mitigate the risk of falls over time.

Objective

The primary objective was to examine the association between receipt of PT and falls requiring medical care within 12 months of presentation for dizziness. Secondary objectives included identification of factors associated with falls requiring medical care and factors associated with receipt of PT after presentation for dizziness.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study examined US commercial insurance and Medicare Advantage claims from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2015. In all, 805 454 patients 18 years or older with a new diagnosis of symptomatic dizziness or vestibular disorders were identified. Data were analyzed from October 1, 2021, to February 1, 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Receipt of PT services and the incidence of falls requiring medical care were measured. The association between receipt of PT and falls that occurred 12 months after presentation for dizziness was estimated after accounting for presentation setting (outpatient clinic or emergency department), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI; with higher scores indicating greater morbidity), diagnosis code, and sociodemographic characteristics.

Results

A total of 805 454 patients presented for dizziness from 2006 through 2015 (median [range] age, 52 [18-87] years; 502 055 females [62%]). Of these patients, 45 771 (6%) received PT within 3 months of presentation for dizziness and 60 060 (7%) experienced a fall resulting in a medical encounter within 12 months after presentation for dizziness. In adjusted models, patients least likely to receive PT were female (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.80; 95% CI, 0.78-0.81), those aged 50 to 59 years (AOR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.65-0.70] compared with patients aged 18-39 years), and those with more comorbidities (AOR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.70-0.73] for CCI ≥ 2 vs 0). Receipt of PT services within 3 months of presentation for dizziness was associated with a reduced risk of falls over the subsequent 12 months, with the greatest risk reduction found within 3 months after PT (AOR, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.14-0.15] at 3-12 months vs 0.18 [95% CI, 0.18-0.19] at 6-12 months and 0.23 [95% CI, 0.23-0.24] at 9-12 months).

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this cohort study suggest that receipt of PT after presentation for dizziness was associated with a reduction in fall risk during the subsequent 12 months; thus, timely PT referral for dizziness may be beneficial for these patients. Future research, ideally with a clinical trial design, is needed to explore the independent impact of PT on subsequent falls for adults with dizziness.

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Self-reported Dizziness in Post-9/11 Service Members and Veterans

INTRODUCTION

Dizziness is prevalent in the general population, but little is known about its prevalence in the U.S. military population. Dizziness is commonly associated with blast exposure and traumatic brain injury (TBI), but the potential independent contributions of blast and TBI have yet to be evaluated. This study's goal was to estimate the prevalence of dizziness among post-9/11 service members and Veterans and to examine independent and joint associations between military TBI history, blast exposure, and self-reported dizziness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study sample consisted of service members (n = 424) and recently separated (< ∼2.5 years) Veterans (n = 492) enrolled in the Noise Outcomes in Service members Epidemiology (NOISE) Study. We examined associations between self-reported history of probable TBI and blast exposure and recent dizziness using logistic regression. Models were stratified by service member versus Veteran status and adjusted to account for potentially confounding demographic and military characteristics.

RESULTS

Overall, 22% of service members and 31% of Veterans self-reported dizziness. Compared to those with neither TBI nor blast exposure history, both service members and Veterans with TBI (with or without blast) were three to four times more likely to self-report dizziness. Those with blast exposure but no TBI history were not more likely to self-report dizziness. There was no evidence of an interaction effect between blast exposure and a history of TBI on the occurrence of dizziness.

CONCLUSION

Self-reported dizziness was prevalent in this sample of service members and Veterans. Probable TBI history, with or without blast exposure, was associated with dizziness, but blast exposure without TBI history was not. This suggests that treatment guidelines for TBI-related dizziness may not need to be tailored to the injury mechanism. However, future efforts should be directed toward the understanding of the pathophysiology of TBI on self-reported dizziness, which is fundamental to the design of treatment strategies.

Use of Neuroimaging for Patients With Dizziness Who Present to Outpatient Clinics vs Emergency Departments in the US

Importance

Overuse of costly neuroimaging technology is associated with low-value care for the prevalent symptom of dizziness. Although quality improvement initiatives have focused on the overuse of computed tomography (CT) scans in emergency departments (EDs), most patients with dizziness present to outpatient clinics. To inform practice and policy, a comprehensive understanding of the uses and costs of neuroimaging across settings and episodes of care is needed.

Objective

To characterize neuroimaging use, timing, and spending as well as factors associated with imaging acquisition within 6 months of presentation for dizziness in outpatient vs ED settings.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cross-sectional study of commercial and Medicare Advantage claims for 805 454 adults (≥18 years of age) with new diagnoses of dizziness was conducted from January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2015. Data were analyzed from October 1, 2020, to September 30, 2021.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Use of neuroimaging (CT scan, magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], angiography, and ultrasonography) and total spending on neuroimaging were measured. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed. The associations of neuroimaging with setting, sociodemographic characteristics, and clinicians were estimated with multivariable analyses.

Results

A total of 805 454 individuals with dizziness (502 055 women [62%]; median age, 52 years [range, 18-87 years]) were included in this study; 156 969 (20%) underwent neuroimaging within 6 months of presentation (65 738 of 185 338 [36%] presented to EDs and 91 231 of 620 116 [15%] presented to outpatient clinics). The median time to neuroimaging was 0 days (95% CI, 0-2 days) after ED presentation and 10 days (95% CI, 9-10 days) after outpatient presentation. Neuroimaging was independently associated with advanced age, comorbidity, race and ethnicity, ED presentation, and outpatient clinician specialty. Across sites, a head CT scan was the most used test on presentation date (92% of tests [46 852 of 51 022]). Within 6 months of presentation, a head CT scan was the most used test (47% of all tests [177 949 of 376 149]), followed by brain MRI (25% [93 130 of 376 149]), cerebrovascular ultrasonography (15% [56 175 of 376 149]), and magnetic resonance angiography (9% [34 026 of 376 149]). Of $88 646 047.03 in total neuroimaging spending, MRI accounted for 70% ($61 730 251.95), CT scans for 19% ($16 910 506.24), and ultrasonography for 11% ($10 005 288.84). Per-test median spending ranged from $68.97 (CT scan of the head) to $319.63 (MRI of the brain) among commercially insured individuals and $43.21 (CT scan of the head) to $362.02 (MRI of the orbit, face, and neck) among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this cross-sectional study suggest that use of neuroimaging for dizziness is prevalent across settings. Interventions to optimize the use of neuroimaging must occur early in the patient care journey to discourage guideline-discordant use of CT scans, advocate for judicious MRI use (particularly in ambulatory settings), and account for the effects of price transparency.

An Exploration of Online Support Community Participation Among Patients With Vestibular Disorders

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To formally document online support community (OSC) use among patients with vestibular symptoms and gain an appreciation for the perceived influence of participation on psychosocial outcomes and the impact on medical decision-making.

STUDY DESIGN

Self reported internet-based questionnaire.

METHODS

The Facebook search function was paired with a comprehensive list of vestibular diagnoses to systematically collect publicly available information on vestibular OSCs. Next, a survey was designed to gather clinicodemographic information, OSC characteristics, participation measures, perceived outcomes, and influence on medical decision-making. The anonymous instrument was posted to two OSCs that provide support for patients with general vestibular symptoms.

RESULTS

Seventy-three OSCs were identified with >250,000 cumulative members and >10,000 posts per month. The survey was completed by 549 participants, a cohort of primarily educated middle-aged (median = 50, interquartile range 40-60), non-Hispanic white (84%), and female (89%) participants. The participants' most cited initial motivation and achieved goal of participants was to hear from others with the same diagnosis (89% and 88%, respectively). Daily users and those who reported seeing ≥5 providers before receiving a diagnosis indicated that OSC utilization significantly influenced their requested medical treatments (72% daily vs. 61% nondaily, P = .012; 61% <5 providers vs. 71% ≥5 providers P = .019, respectively). Most participants agreed that OSC engagement provides emotional support (74%) and helps to develop coping strategies (68%). Membership of ≥1 year was associated with a higher rate of learned coping skills (61% membership <1-year vs. 71% ≥1-year P = .016).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of OSCs is widespread among vestibular diagnoses. A survey of two OSCs suggests these groups provide a significant source of peer support and can influence users' ability to interface with the medical system.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A Laryngoscope, 2021.