Influence of Age and Sex on Clinical and Therapeutic Features of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

Minimum Effective Duration of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease Treatment: A Prospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the minimum therapeutic duration for patients with primary laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) through the evaluation of symptom changes at multiple time points.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective uncontrolled.

SETTING

University medical center.

METHODS

Patients with LPRD at the 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring were recruited from the European Reflux Clinic. Depending on the type of LPRD, patients were treated with a combination of proton-pump inhibitors, alginate, or magaldrate. Symptoms were evaluated with the reflux symptom score (RSS) at baseline and throughout treatment (1-, 3-, 6-, and 9-month posttreatment). The most appropriate therapeutic duration was determined using the RSS changes. Signs were evaluated with the reflux sign assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 159 patients completed the study. The mean age was 49.9 ± 15.7 years. At 1-month posttreatment, 97 patients (61.0%) were considered as early responders to treatment, and the treatment was stopped for 52 patients (32.7%). Of the 62 early nonresponders, 34 patients (21.4%) reached responded to treatment after 3 to 9 months. The cumulative therapeutic success rate at 1-month posttreatment (61.0%) progressively increased to reach a range of 82.4% to 99.3% at 9-month posttreatment. The RSS mainly decreased in the first month of treatment in early responders. In early nonresponders, RSS progressively decreased throughout the 9-month treatment period. The baseline severity of RSS is a strong predictor of therapeutic response.

CONCLUSION

A therapeutic regimen of 1 month can be sufficient to treat one third of LPRD patients. The early nonresponders may require 3 to 9 months of treatment.

Relationship between burning mouth disorder and gastroesophageal reflux disease: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to provide a scoping review and attempts to uncover the possible association between burning mouth disorder and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, Ovid, Scopus, and a search platform (EBSCOhost) were searched from their inception to August 22, 2023.

RESULTS

After screening 2795 records, 18 articles were included in the final review, comprising cross-sectional studies (n = 9), case-control studies (n = 5), case reports (n = 2), case series (n = 1), and experimental study (n = 1). The prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and its extraesophageal manifestations of laryngopharyngeal reflux in burning mouth patients was reported 3.39%-23.4% and 50%-93.8%, respectively, while oral burning was reported in 9%-45% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. In case-control studies, gastroesophageal reflux disease was more prevalent in patients with burning mouth disorder compared with controls. Burning mouth would be resolved after antireflux therapy in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients in case series. PH value and saliva alternation might be the possible mechanisms.

CONCLUSION

The possibility of the correlation between burning mouth disorder and gastroesophageal reflux disease still needs to be clearly demonstrated through better-conducted studies. The link between them is worth to be explored in future research.

The Inclusion of Voice Assessments to Aid Diagnostic and Surgical Decision Making for Patients With Laryngopharyngeal Reflux

OBJECTIVE

Patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) present with a variety of symptoms, such as cough, hoarseness, and globus sensation, and often do not have the classic features associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

STUDY DESIGN

To achieve greater clarity in the symptom presentation, response to treatment, and the impact on vocal function among patients presenting with signs and symptoms consistent with LPR, we prospectively evaluated initial assessments and outcomes after medication or surgical management.

METHODS

A sample of 109 patients completed self-report measures of reflux symptoms, voice handicap, and underwent diagnostic workup by both laryngologist and foregut surgeon to include laryngoscopy, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, manometry and pH monitoring. Patients were then followed for at least 3 months, and outcomes of therapy were recorded.

RESULTS

The most common indicators on initial workup were reflux symptom inventory score ≥ 13 and at least one abnormality on manometry. Male patients were significantly more likely to demonstrate esophagitis on biopsy, abnormal upper esophageal sphincter mean pressure, and acid (vs nonacid) reflux. Older patients were more likely to have normal esophageal distal contractile integral activity. Significantly higher voice handicap ratings were observed among patients with a positive reflux indicator score in addition to abnormal upper esophageal sphincter mean basal pressure and contractile front velocity. Patients with acid versus nonacid reflux were equally as likely to report non-responsivity to antisecretory medications. Among a subset of patients with 3-month follow-up data (N = 39), reflux scores were significantly lower irrespective of treatment modality (surgical vs pharmacological intervention).

CONCLUSION

Extensive comprehensive workup did not reveal a single predictive indicator for LPR. Voice assessments may be more sensitive to upper esophageal symptomatology or dysfunction compared to reflux assessments, which may be better indicators of inflammation. Our collaborative data confirms the value of assessing vocal quality and impairment, especially in the presence of equivocal reflux indicators, as together these measures may achieve greater sensitivity to reflux issues and may aid in surgical decision making.

Validity and Reliability of the Reflux Sign Assessment-10 (RSA-10)

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate the Reflux Sign Assessment-10 (RSA-10) for documenting the physical findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD).

METHODS

Patients with LPRD at the hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring and asymptomatic individuals were consecutively recruited from two European hospitals. Three experienced otolaryngologists rated RSA-10 in patients and controls for assessing internal validity. RSA-10 was rated within a 7-day period to assess test-retest reliability. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's α in patients and controls. Convergent validity was evaluated through a correlation analysis between RSA-10 and Reflux Finding Score (RFS). Interrater reliability was evaluated by comparing the RSA-10 evaluations of the three otolaryngologists through Fleiss kappa. Pre- to posttreatment change of RSA-10 was evaluated to assess responsiveness to change. The RSA-10 thresholds were examined by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients completed the pre- to posttreatment evaluations from January 2020 to December 2023. A total of 115 asymptomatic individuals completed the study. RSA-10 reported high internal consistency reliability (α = 0.822) and test-retest reliability (rs = 0.725). The RSA-10 scores of patients were significantly higher than those of controls (p = 0.001), suggesting high internal validity. RSA-10 was significantly correlated with the RFS (rs = 0.771). The interrater reliability was adequate for sub- and total RSA-10 scores (k = 0.708). RSA-10 significantly improved from baseline to 3-month posttreatment (p = 0.001). An RSA-10 > 13 may be suggestive of LPRD. Both RSA-10 > 13 and Reflux Symptom Score-12 > 11 were associated with a sensitivity of 92.7% and a specificity of 97.3%.

CONCLUSION

The RSA-10 is a reliable and valid clinical instrument for documenting the most prevalent laryngeal and extra-laryngeal findings associated with LPRD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:3981-3988, 2024.

The Time-Point Distribution Characteristics of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Elderly Patients

OBJECTIVE

To identify the characteristics of the time-point distribution of the occurrence of hypopharyngeal-proximal reflux episodes (HREs) in elderly and younger patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Analysis of data from patients with LPR-related symptoms and 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (24-hour HEMII-pH) monitoring from February 2017 to September 2022 at Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital.

METHODS

Patients were divided into 2 age groups: the elderly group (>60 years) and the younger group (≤60 years). The time series of HREs and meals within 24 hours were analyzed based on HEMII-pH.

RESULTS

A total of 305 patients were included (126 elderly patients). In younger patients, except for nonacid-gas HREs, the incidence of the remaining types of HREs tended to increase within 2 hours after meals, especially after dinner. The incidence of all types of HREs pre- and postmeal was not significantly different in the elderly group (χ2  = 0.080, P = .777). The incidence of nighttime HREs in elderly patients was statistically higher than in younger patients (6.23% vs 3.96%, P = .030), particularly acid-/nonacid-liquid HREs.

CONCLUSION

HREs tend to increase within 2 hours after meals in younger LPR patients, except for nonacid-gas HREs. In elderly LPR patients, the incidence of all types of HREs pre- and postmeal were not significantly different, and nighttime fluid HREs was more prone to occur than in younger patients.

Personalized Treatments Based on Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patient Profiles: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVE

To review the current findings of the literature on the existence of several profiles of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients and to propose personalized diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

METHODS

A state-of-the art review of the literature was conducted using the PubMED, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. The information related to epidemiology, demographics, clinical presentations, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic responses were extracted to identify outcomes that may influence the clinical and therapeutic courses of LPR.

RESULTS

The clinical presentation and therapeutic courses of LPR may be influenced by gender, age, weight, comorbidities, dietary habits and culture, anxiety, stress, and saliva enzyme profile. The clinical expression of reflux, including laryngopharyngeal, respiratory, nasal, and eye symptoms, and the hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring profile of patients are important issues to improve in patient management. The use of more personalized therapeutic strategies appears to be associated with better symptom relief and cures over the long-term. The role of pepsin in LPR physiology is well-established but the lack of information about the role of other gastrointestinal enzymes in the development of LPR-related mucosa inflammation limits the development of future enzyme-based personalized diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.

CONCLUSION

Laryngopharyngeal reflux is a challenging ear, nose, and throat condition associated with poor therapeutic responses and a long-term burden in Western countries. Artificial intelligence should be used for developing personalized therapeutic strategies based on patient features.

Usefulness, acceptation and feasibility of electronic medical history tool in reflux disease

OBJECTIVES

To investigate usefulness, feasibility, and patient satisfaction of an electronic pre-consultation medical history tool (EPMH) in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) work-up.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients with LPR were invited to complete electronic medical history assessment prior to laryngology consultation. EPMH collected the following parameters: demographic and epidemiological data, medication, medical and surgical histories, diet habits, stress and symptom findings. Stress and symptoms were assessed with perceived stress scale and reflux symptom score. Duration of consultation, acceptance, and satisfaction of patients (feasibility, usefulness, effectiveness, understanding of questions) were evaluated through a 9-item patient-reported outcome questionnaire.

RESULTS

Seventy patients completed the evaluation (93% participation rate). The mean age of cohort was 51.2 ± 15.6 years old. There were 35 females and 35 males. Patients who refused to participate (N = 5) were > 65 years old. The consultation duration was significantly lower in patients who used the EPMH (11.3 ± 2.7 min) compared with a control group (18.1 ± 5.1 min; p = 0.001). Ninety percent of patients were satisfied about EPMH easiness and usefulness, while 97.1% thought that EPMH may improve the disease management. Patients would recommend similar approach for otolaryngological or other specialty consultations in 98.6% and 92.8% of cases, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of EPMH is associated with adequate usefulness, feasibility, and satisfaction outcomes in patients with LPR. This software is a preliminary step in the development of an AI-based diagnostic decision support tool to help laryngologists in their daily practice. Future randomized controlled studies are needed to investigate the gain of similar approaches on the traditional consultation format.

Characteristics of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Patients of Different Genders and Ages

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the differences in laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) characteristics between gender and age groups based on the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Reflux Finding Score (RFS) scale and 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (HEMII-pH) monitoring.

METHODS

The enrolled were patients with LPR symptoms completed the 24h-HEMII-pH monitoring and divided into two gender groups (male and female) and elderly group (>60 years), middle-aged group (41-60 years) and young group (18-40 years). The total RSI and RFS scores of individuals were counted. Various potential differences as well as incidence of each type of LPR events between gender and age groups were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 420 patients were included, with 333 (79.3%) diagnosed with LPR confirmed by 24h-HEMII-pH monitoring. Females (n=49) had a statistically higher LPR positivity (91.0% vs. 76.6%, P < 0.01) than males (n=342). Female patients with LPR had significantly higher RSI scores (14.08 ± 6.72 vs. 11.08 ± 4.82, P < 0.001) than male patients. The positive rate of LPR were 82.6%, 80.7% and 63.3% in the elderly, middle-aged and young groups. The Elderly group had significantly lower RSI scores (10.20 ± 4.06 vs. 12.80 ± 6.58, 12.24 ± 5.57, P < 0.001) but higher RFS scores (9.37 ± 3.25 vs. 8.16 ± 3.34, 8.57 ± 2.58, P < 0.05) than the other two groups. The number of acid hypopharyngeal-proximal reflux episodes (HREs) and distal esophageal acid reflux were significantly higher in elderly than in young patients. Except for non-acid gas HREs, the positive rates of other types of HREs were increasing from young to middle-aged to the elderly group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Female patients with suspected LPR symptoms had a higher positive rate of LPR and RSI score than males. The prevalence of LPR and the number of acid reflux were progressively increasing with age, but the perception of reflux symptoms may diminish.

Treating and Managing Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease in the Over 65s: Evidence to Date

Purpose

The clinical presentation and therapeutic outcomes of elderly patients may be different from those in younger populations, leading to additional diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. The present study reviewed the findings on the epidemiology, and clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic outcomes of elderly patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

Methods

A PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus literature search was conducted on the epidemiological, clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic findings of elderly LPR patients.

Findings

The prevalence of LPR in the elderly population remains unknown. From a clinical standpoint, older LPR patients report overall lower symptom scores and related quality-of-life outcomes at the time of the diagnosis. The required treatment time to obtain symptom relief appears to be longer in older compared with younger patients. Particular attention needs to be paid to prolonged medication use because the elderly population is characterized by polypharmacy and there is a higher risk of proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) interactions and adverse events. The plasma clearance of most PPIs is reduced with age, which must be considered by practitioners in the prescription of antireflux therapy.

Conclusion

The clinical presentation and treatment efficacy of elderly LPR patients differ from those in younger patients. Practitioners need to carefully consider the risk of drug interactions and adverse events in elderly patients.

Differences in Diagnostic Rates After Hypopharyngeal-esophageal Impedance-pH Monitoring of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients by Age and Sex

PURPOSE

To evaluate the differences in diagnostic rates according to the age and sex of patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms and completed the 24-hour hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (24h-HEMII-pH) monitoring.

METHODS

Patients with LPR symptoms underwent the 24h-HEMII-pH monitoring. We compared the diagnostic rates of LPR in patients with LPR symptoms according to age and sex. The number of reflux episodes and type of reflux were compared among patients who were confirmed to have LPR according to age and sex.

RESULTS

A total of 249 patients with suspected LPR symptoms who completed 24h-HEMII-pH monitoring were analyzed. A total of 170 patients (68.3%) were diagnosed with LPR after 24h-HEMII-pH monitoring. There were 57 (67.1%) men and 113 (68.9%) women. The old age group (older than 55 years) showed a statistically significant higher diagnostic rate than the young age group (73.5%, 60.8%, p=0.034). Women's diagnostic rate was statistically higher in the old age group than that in the young age group (75% vs. 58.3%, p=0.026). There were no specific differences in the number of refluxes in the diagnosed patients between the age groups, and there were no differences in the initial reflux symptom index.

CONCLUSIONS

Among those who visited the clinic with suspected LPR symptoms and performed 24h-HEMII-pH monitoring, the diagnostic rate of LPR was higher in the older age group than that in the younger age group.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux may be acute, recurrent or chronic disease: preliminary observations

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the mid-to-long-term symptom evolution and treatment findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients.

METHODS

Patients with LPR and treated between September 2016 and December 2017 were prospectively followed. The diagnosis consisted of > 1 pharyngeal event at the hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring. The treatment consisted of 3- to 9-months diet, stress management and medication according to the type of LPR. Reflux symptom score was used to assess the therapeutic response. Patients were surveyed yearly to know the reflux evolution, the potential recurrence(s) of symptoms, and the approaches used to control the disease.

RESULTS

A total of 77 patients completed the evaluations (45 females). The initial treatment duration was 3, 6, or 9 months in 25 (32.5%), 23 (29.9%), and 6 (7.7%) cases before weaning, respectively. Twenty-three patients (29.9%) reported chronic course of the disease. According to the reduction of reflux symptom score, symptoms did not change in 11 (14.3%) patients, while the rest of the patients reported symptom reduction or relief (responder rate of 85.7%). Over time, LPR symptoms never relapsed in 31% of cases, while 38% of patients reported one or several recurrences a year. The recurrence episodes of patients were all adequately treated with medication or diet and did not require long-term medication.

CONCLUSION

Chronic course of the disease was observed in 31% of patients who required long-term medication. Preliminary observations reported that LPR may be classified as acute, recurrent, or chronic disease. The medication weaning is possible in most patients, leading to reduction of cost burden related to LPR treatment.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: Evolution and Predictive Value of Symptoms and pH-Impedance Features on Clinical Evolution

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the features of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) who did not respond to medical treatment.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective uncontrolled study.

SETTING

Multicenter study.

METHODS

Patients with LPR at 24-hour HEMII-pH monitoring (hypopharyngeal-esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH) were prospectively recruited from 3 European university centers. Patients were treated with 3- to 6-month medication (proton pump inhibitor and alginate) and categorized as mild to moderate responders, high responders, or nonresponders according to Reflux Symptom Score (RSS) changes at 6 months posttreatment. The predictive value of the following outcomes was studied: epidemiologic data, HEMII-pH, gastrointestinal endoscopy findings, baseline RSS and Reflux Sign Assessment, and early therapeutic response (6-week RSS).

RESULTS

A total of 148 patients completed the evaluations, accounting for 40 mild to moderate responders (20%-60% RSS changes), 76 high responders (>60% RSS changes), and 32 nonresponders. Nonresponders presented more often with hiatal hernia and lower esophageal sphincter insufficiency when compared with mild to moderate and high responders (P = .032). Baseline otolaryngologic, digestive, and respiratory RSS and the number of pharyngeal reflux events at the HEMII-pH were predictive of the 6-month therapeutic response (P < .05). The early therapeutic response (6 weeks posttreatment) was predictive of the 6-month treatment response.

CONCLUSION

Hiatal hernia and baseline and 6-week RSS were the most predictive indicators of therapeutic effectiveness in patients with LPR.

Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Hypopnea Syndrome: An Updated Meta-Analysis

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a common disorder in patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS). This meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the LPR prevalence in individuals with OSAHS and to analyze the correlation of LPR positivity with the clinical features of patients with OSAHS. A detailed review of the English and Chinese literature on the occurrence of LPR in patients with OSAHS was performed by employing online search tools such as PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, VIP, CNKI, WanFang, etc. Two researchers analyzed the studies for quality according to the STROBE standard checklist. The acquired data were analyzed using Stata 11.0 and R 3.6.1 software. The effect size was estimated and calculated using weighted mean difference (WMD) and correlation coefficients. Moreover, a combined analysis was performed by employing either a random- or fixed-effects model. Ultimately, 27 studies met our inclusion criteria. Our study revealed that the LPR prevalence in OSAHS patients was 49%. We carried out subgroup analyses as per OSAHS severity, ethnicity, and body mass index (BMI). The results suggested that the probability of LPR in European and American patients with OSAHS was higher, and the prevalence of LPR was higher in obese individuals and patients with severe OSAHS. Moreover, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and BMI were higher in LPR-positive OSAHS patients than in LPR-negative OSAHS patients, but no significant variation in age was observed in the two groups. Moreover, the reflux symptom index (RSI) scores and the reflux finding score (RFS) exhibited a positive correlation with AHI. The current literature shows a higher incidence of LPR in individuals with OSAHS (49%). The severity of AHI in individuals with OSAHS is associated with the presence of LPR. Patients with OSAHS accompanied by LPR showed higher BMI and AHI as compared to those patients with LPR-negative OSAHS.