1
|
Zhao J, Fan K, Zheng S, Xie G, Niu X, Pang J, Zhang H, Wu X, Qu J. Effect of occupational therapy on the occurrence of delirium in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol 2024; 15:1391993. [PMID: 39105057 PMCID: PMC11298357 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1391993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim Delirium poses a major challenge to global health care, yet there is currently a dearth of single effective interventions or medications. Particularly, addressing delirium induced by critical illness is a complex process. Occupational therapy is considered to have a high potential for use in the prevention of delirium, as it involves both cognitive training and training in ADL. To comprehensively analyze the effect of occupational therapy on delirium prevention, we evaluated the effects of occupational therapy vs. standard non-pharmacological prevention on incidence and duration of delirium, clinical outcomes and rehabilitation outcomes in critically ill patients. Methods The data sources, including PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, were comprehensively searched from their inception until 15 October 2023. Following the PICOS principle, a systematic screening of literature was conducted to identify relevant studies. Subsequently, the quality assessment was performed to evaluate the risk of bias in the included literature. Finally, outcome measures from each study were extracted and comprehensive analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.4. Results A total of four clinical trials met the selection criteria. The pooled analysis indicated no significant difference in the incidence and duration of delirium between the OT group and standard non-pharmacological interventions. A comprehensive analysis of clinical outcomes revealed that OT did not significantly reduce the length of hospital stay or ICU stay. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in mortality rates between the two groups. It is noteworthy that although grip strength levels did not exhibit significant improvement following OT intervention, there were obvious enhancements observed in ADL and MMSE scores. Conclusion Although occupational therapy may not be the most effective in preventing delirium, it has been shown to significantly improve ADL and cognitive function among critically ill patients. Therefore, we contend that occupational therapy is a valuable component of a comprehensive multidisciplinary approach to managing delirium. In the future, high-quality researches are warranted to optimize the implementation of occupational therapy interventions for delirium prevention and further enhance their benefits for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Zhao
- Rehabilitation Assessment and Treatment Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Kaipeng Fan
- Department of Rehabilitation, Hangzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Suqin Zheng
- Rehabilitation Assessment and Treatment Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Guangyao Xie
- Rehabilitation Assessment and Treatment Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xuekang Niu
- Rehabilitation Assessment and Treatment Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jinkuo Pang
- Rehabilitation Assessment and Treatment Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Huihuang Zhang
- Rehabilitation Assessment and Treatment Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xin Wu
- Rehabilitation Assessment and Treatment Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jiayang Qu
- Rehabilitation Assessment and Treatment Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
- School of Rehabilitation Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lu N, Chi Y, Liu M. Relationship Between Coronary Artery Revascularization and Postoperative Delirium: Progress and Perspectives. Angiology 2024:33197241252467. [PMID: 38712998 DOI: 10.1177/00033197241252467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
Brain dysfunction resulting from damage to the heart-brain link leads to a decline in cognitive function. This, in turn, gives rise to the clinical symptom of perioperative delirium in patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization. Those affected are provided symptomatic treatment, but many do not recover fully. Thus, medium- and long-term mortality and adverse event rates remain relatively high in patients with perioperative delirium. Despite the relatively high incidence of perioperative delirium in patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization, it has not been systematically investigated. Inflammation, vascular damage, neuronal damage, and embolism are all involved in the injury process. Here, we discuss the incidence rate, pathological mechanisms, and prognosis of delirium after coronary artery revascularization. We also discuss in detail the risk factors for delirium after coronary artery revascularization, such as anxiety, depression, mode of operation, and drug use. We hope that prevention, early diagnosis, assessment, and potential treatment can be achieved by cardiologists to improve patient prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nan Lu
- Department of Psycho-cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yunpeng Chi
- Department of Psycho-cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Meiyan Liu
- Department of Psycho-cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Paton M, Chan S, Serpa Neto A, Tipping CJ, Stratton A, Lane R, Romero L, Broadley T, Hodgson CL. Association of active mobilisation variables with adverse events and mortality in patients requiring mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. THE LANCET. RESPIRATORY MEDICINE 2024; 12:386-398. [PMID: 38513675 DOI: 10.1016/s2213-2600(24)00011-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Revised: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mobilisation during critical illness is now included in multiple clinical practice guidelines. However, a large, randomised trial and systematic review have recently identified an increased probability of adverse events and mortality in patients who received early active mobilisation in the intensive care unit (ICU). We aimed to determine the effects of mobilisation compared with usual care on adverse events and mortality in an acute ICU setting. In subgroup analyses, we specifically aimed to investigate possible sources of harm, including the timing and duration of mobilisation achieved, ventilation status, and admission diagnosis. METHODS In this systematic review with frequentist and Bayesian analyses, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and PEDro electronic databases, as well as clinical trial registries (ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov), from inception to March 16, 2023, without language restrictions. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials that examined active mobilisation compared with either no mobilisation or mobilisation commencing later, or at a lower frequency or intensity, in adults who were critically ill during or after a period of mechanical ventilation in an acute ICU setting. Two authors independently screened reports, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (version 1). The primary outcome was the number of adverse events that occurred during the implementation of mobilisation, with the effect of mobilisation on mortality being the secondary outcome. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated in R (version 4.0.3) using random-effects modelling, with Bayesian analysis completed to calculate the probability of treatment harm (ie, RR >1). Subgroup analyses were completed to investigate the association of various factors of mobilisation on adverse events and mortality: duration of mobilisation (longer [≥20 min per day] vs shorter [<20 min per day]), timing of commencement (early [≤72 h from ICU admission] vs late [>72 h from ICU admission]), ventilation status at commencement (all patients mechanically ventilated vs all patients extubated), and ICU admission diagnosis (surgical vs medical). This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022369272. FINDINGS After title and abstract screening of 14 440 studies and review of 466 full texts, 67 trials with 7004 participants met inclusion criteria, with 59 trials contributing to the meta-analysis. Of the 67 included studies, 15 (22%) did not mention adverse events and 13 (19%) reported no adverse events occurring across the trial period. Overall, we found no effect of mobilisation compared with usual care on the occurrence of adverse events (RR 1·09 [95% CI 0·69-1·74], p=0·71; I2 91%; 32 731 events, 20 studies; very low certainty), with a 2·96% occurrence rate (693 events in 23 395 intervention sessions; 25 studies). Mobilisation did not have any effect on mortality (RR 0·98 [95% CI 0·87-1·12], p=0·81; I2 0%; n=6218, 58 studies; moderate certainty). Subgroup analysis was hindered by the large amount of data that could not be allocated and analysed, making the results hypothesis generating only. INTERPRETATION Implementation of mobilisation in the ICU was associated with a less than 3% chance of an adverse event occurring and was not found to increase adverse events or mortality overall, providing reassurance for clinicians about the safety of performing this intervention. Subgroup analyses did not clearly identify any specific variable of mobilisation implementation that increased harm. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Paton
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Physiotherapy, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Sarah Chan
- Department of Physiotherapy, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Ary Serpa Neto
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Claire J Tipping
- Department of Physiotherapy, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Anne Stratton
- Department of Physiotherapy, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Rebecca Lane
- School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia
| | - Lorena Romero
- Ian Potter Library, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Tessa Broadley
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Carol L Hodgson
- Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Physiotherapy, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Li L, Liu M, Li S, Xu J, Zheng J, Lv C, Wu L, Heng L. Influence of Regional Nerve Block in Addition to General Anesthesia on Postoperative Delirium, Pain, and In-hospital Stay in Patients Undergoing Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2023; 82:496-503. [PMID: 37548460 DOI: 10.1097/fjc.0000000000001469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study aims to investigate whether venous injection of sedative agent or regional nerve block in alliance with major anesthesia could decrease the risk of postoperative delirium occurrence in patients receiving cardiothoracic surgery. Electronic academic databases were retrieved for related publications, and statistical software was used for data pooling and analysis. Forest plot was used to show the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio. Combined receiver operating characteristic curve was used to show the area under the curve of complex data. Seven studies were included for analysis. The risk of occurrence of delirium still showed no difference (risk rate = 0.93, 95% CI, 0.85-1.03) between the intervention group and placebo group. Postoperative pain feeling was more alleviated in patients with prophylactic application of regional nerve block. In addition, prophylactic application of regional nerve block could decrease the risk of postoperative in-hospital stay (risk rate = 0.28, 95% CI, 0.02-0.54). Our study demonstrated that, in elderly patients or pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery, prophylactic application of regional nerve block failed to decrease the incidence of postoperative delirium. However, the option of regional nerve block could decrease the duration of in-hospitalization stay and alleviate the acute pain during the postoperative period after open-heart surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Li
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, First People's Hospital of Xuzhou, Xuzhou Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Affiliated Hospital of Mining and Technology of China University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Min Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Xuzhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Songsong Li
- Department of Orthopedics, First People's Hospital of Xuzhou, Xuzhou Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Affiliated Hospital of Mining and Technology of China University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jiahui Xu
- Department of Ophthalmology, First People's Hospital of Xuzhou, Xuzhou Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Affiliated Hospital of Mining and Technology of China University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jun Zheng
- Department of Orthopedics, First People's Hospital of Xuzhou, Xuzhou Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Affiliated Hospital of Mining and Technology of China University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Chengwei Lv
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, First People's Hospital of Xuzhou, Xuzhou Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Affiliated Hospital of Mining and Technology of China University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Linlin Wu
- Department of Hemodialysis, First People's Hospital of Xuzhou, Xuzhou Municipal Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University, Affiliated Hospital of Mining and Technology of China University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Lei Heng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou Cancer Hospital, Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Xuzhou New Healthy Geriatric Hospital, Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China; and
- Department of Anesthesiology, the Affiliated Xuzhou Hospital of JiangSu University, Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Unoki T, Hayashida K, Kawai Y, Taito S, Ando M, Iida Y, Kasai F, Kawasaki T, Kozu R, Kondo Y, Saitoh M, Sakuramoto H, Sasaki N, Saura R, Nakamura K, Ouchi A, Okamoto S, Okamura M, Kuribara T, Kuriyama A, Matsuishi Y, Yamamoto N, Yoshihiro S, Yasaka T, Abe R, Iitsuka T, Inoue H, Uchiyama Y, Endo S, Okura K, Ota K, Otsuka T, Okada D, Obata K, Katayama Y, Kaneda N, Kitayama M, Kina S, Kusaba R, Kuwabara M, Sasanuma N, Takahashi M, Takayama C, Tashiro N, Tatsuno J, Tamura T, Tamoto M, Tsuchiya A, Tsutsumi Y, Nagato T, Narita C, Nawa T, Nonoyama T, Hanada M, Hirakawa K, Makino A, Masaki H, Matsuki R, Matsushima S, Matsuda W, Miyagishima S, Moromizato M, Yanagi N, Yamauchi K, Yamashita Y, Yamamoto N, Liu K, Wakabayashi Y, Watanabe S, Yonekura H, Nakanishi N, Takahashi T, Nishida O. Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rehabilitation in Critically Ill Patients 2023 (J-ReCIP 2023). J Intensive Care 2023; 11:47. [PMID: 37932849 PMCID: PMC10629099 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-023-00697-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Providing standardized, high-quality rehabilitation for critically ill patients is a crucial issue. In 2017, the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine (JSICM) promulgated the "Evidence-Based Expert Consensus for Early Rehabilitation in the Intensive Care Unit" to advocate for the early initiation of rehabilitations in Japanese intensive care settings. Building upon this seminal work, JSICM has recently conducted a rigorous systematic review utilizing the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. This endeavor resulted in the formulation of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs), designed to elucidate best practices in early ICU rehabilitation. The primary objective of this guideline is to augment clinical understanding and thereby facilitate evidence-based decision-making, ultimately contributing to the enhancement of patient outcomes in critical care settings. No previous CPGs in the world has focused specifically on rehabilitation of critically ill patients, using the GRADE approach. Multidisciplinary collaboration is extremely important in rehabilitation. Thus, the CPGs were developed by 73 members of a Guideline Development Group consisting of a working group, a systematic review group, and an academic guideline promotion group, with the Committee for the Clinical Practice Guidelines of Early Mobilization and Rehabilitation in Intensive Care of the JSICM at its core. Many members contributed to the development of the guideline, including physicians and healthcare professionals with multiple and diverse specialties, as well as a person who had been patients in ICU. Based on discussions among the group members, eight important clinical areas of focus for this CPG were identified. Fourteen important clinical questions (CQs) were then developed for each area. The public was invited to comment twice, and the answers to the CQs were presented in the form of 10 GRADE recommendations and commentary on the four background questions. In addition, information for each CQ has been created as a visual clinical flow to ensure that the positioning of each CQ can be easily understood. We hope that the CPGs will be a useful tool in the rehabilitation of critically ill patients for multiple professions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Unoki
- Department Acute and Critical Care Nursing, School of Nursing, Sapporo City University, Sapporo, Japan.
| | - Kei Hayashida
- Department of Emergency Medicine, South Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Bay Shore, NY, USA
| | - Yusuke Kawai
- Department of Nursing, Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Taito
- Department of Clinical Practice and Support, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Morihide Ando
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan
| | - Yuki Iida
- Faculty of Physical Therapy, School of Health Sciences, Toyohashi Sozo University, Toyohashi, Japan
| | - Fumihito Kasai
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Kawasaki
- Department of Pediatric Critical Care, Shizuoka Children's Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Ryo Kozu
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
- Department of Physical Therapy Science, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Yutaka Kondo
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Urayasu, Japan
| | - Masakazu Saitoh
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideaki Sakuramoto
- Department of Critical Care and Disaster Nursing, Japanese Red Cross Kyushu International College of Nursing, Munakata, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Sasaki
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Ryuichi Saura
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Comprehensive Medicine, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University School of Medicine, Takatsuki, Japan
| | - Kensuke Nakamura
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Yokohama City University Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Akira Ouchi
- Department of Adult Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Ibaraki Christian University, Hitachi, Japan
| | - Saiko Okamoto
- Department of Nursing, Hitachi General Hospital, Hitachi, Japan
| | - Masatsugu Okamura
- Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tomoki Kuribara
- Department Acute and Critical Care Nursing, School of Nursing, Sapporo City University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Akira Kuriyama
- Department of Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yujiro Matsuishi
- School of Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Norimasa Yamamoto
- Department of Nursing, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Toyama, Japan
| | - Shodai Yoshihiro
- Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Taisuke Yasaka
- Global Nursing Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryo Abe
- Department of Rehabilitation, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takahito Iitsuka
- Department of Rehabilitation, Amagasaki Daimotsu Rehabilitation Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan
| | - Hiroyasu Inoue
- Department of Rehabilitation, Showa University School of Nursing and Rehabilitation Sciences, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yuki Uchiyama
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School of Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | - Satoshi Endo
- Rehabilitation Center, Amayama Hospital, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Kazuki Okura
- Division of Rehabilitation, Akita University Hospital, Akita, Japan
| | - Kohei Ota
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Takahisa Otsuka
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Daisuke Okada
- Department of Rehabilitation, Saiseikai Kumamoto Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Kengo Obata
- Department of Rehabilitation, Japanese Red Cross Okayama Hospital, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yukiko Katayama
- Department of Nursing, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Fuchu, Japan
| | - Naoki Kaneda
- Rehabilitation Division, Hokkaido Medical Center for Child Health and Rehabilitation, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Mio Kitayama
- Nursing Department, Kanazawa Medical University Hospital, Uchinada, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Kina
- Department of Rehabilitation, Nakagami Hospital, Okinawa, Japan
| | - Ryuichi Kusaba
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | | - Naoki Sasanuma
- Department of Rehabilitation, Hyogo Medical University Hospital, Nishinomiya, Japan
| | | | | | - Naonori Tashiro
- Rehabilitation Center, Showa University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junko Tatsuno
- Department of Nursing, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kitakyusyu, Japan
| | - Takahiko Tamura
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Tamoto
- Department of Nursing, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Asuka Tsuchiya
- Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yusuke Tsutsumi
- Department of Emergency Medicine, National Hospital Organization Mito Medical Center, Mito, Japan
| | - Tadashi Nagato
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Infectious Diseases, JCHO Tokyo Yamate Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chihiro Narita
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Nawa
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hokkaido Medical Center for Child Health and Rehabilitation, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Tadayoshi Nonoyama
- Department of Rehabilitation, University of Fukui Hospital, Fukui, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Hanada
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Kotaro Hirakawa
- Department of Rehabilitation, Sakakibara Heart Institute, Fuchu, Japan
| | - Akiko Makino
- School of Nursing, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Masaki
- Department of Nursing, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Matsuki
- Department of Rehabilitation, Kansai Electric Power Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Wataru Matsuda
- Department of Emergency Medicine & Critical Care, Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Shinjuku, Japan
| | - Saori Miyagishima
- Division of Rehabilitation, Sapporo Medical University Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Masaru Moromizato
- Department of Nursing, Chubu Tokushukai Hospital, Kitanakagusuku, Japan
| | - Naoya Yanagi
- Department of Rehabilitation, Kitasato University Medical Center, Kitamoto, Japan
| | - Kota Yamauchi
- Department of Rehabilitation, Steel Memorial Yawata Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | - Yuhei Yamashita
- Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gunma Prefectural Cardiovascular Center, Maebashi, Japan
| | - Natsuhiro Yamamoto
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Keibun Liu
- Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Non-Profit Organization ICU Collaboration Network (ICON), Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Wakabayashi
- Department of Nursing, Kobe City Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Shinichi Watanabe
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Gifu University of Health Science, Gifu, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yonekura
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Fujita Health University Bantane Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Nobuto Nakanishi
- Department of Disaster and Emergency Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Takahashi
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Osamu Nishida
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Allahbakhshian A, Khalili AF, Gholizadeh L, Esmealy L. Comparison of early mobilization protocols on postoperative cognitive dysfunction, pain, and length of hospital stay in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Appl Nurs Res 2023; 73:151731. [PMID: 37722799 DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2023.151731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 08/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
Although coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery improves the life expectancy of patients with coronary artery disease, it is associated with various short and long-term complications. Early mobilization has been shown to reduce the risk of these complications. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of different early mobilization protocols on postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), pain intensity, and length of hospital stay (LOS) in patients undergoing CABG. This three-arm parallel randomized controlled trial included 120 patients undergoing CABG surgery who were randomly assigned to Intervention A, which received a four-phase early mobilization protocol; Intervention B, which received a three-phase early mobilization protocol; and the Control group, which received routine care. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction and pain were assessed using Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and visual analog scale (VAS), respectively. Groups were comparable in demographic and clinical characteristics and postoperative cognitive dysfunction at baseline. After the intervention, Group B had statistically significantly (p < 0.001) less cognitive dysfunction (25.8 ± 1.7) compared to Group A (24.1 ± 2.2) and the Control Group (23.4 ± 2.7). Likewise, hospital stay was statistically (p < 0.01) shorter for Group B (7.7 ± 1.5) than the Control group (8.9 ± 1.9). However, the experience of pain was statistically significantly lower over time in Group A than in the other groups (p < 0.001). This study concludes that an early mobilization protocol based on deep breathing exercises and chest physiotherapy may better improve postoperative cognitive dysfunction and length of hospital stay than an early mobilization protocol based on passive and active range of motion activities or routine care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atefeh Allahbakhshian
- Department of Medical-Surgical, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Azizeh Farshbaf Khalili
- Department of Physical Medicine Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| | - Leila Gholizadeh
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Leyla Esmealy
- Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bach C, Hetland B. A Step Forward for Intensive Care Unit Patients: Early Mobility Interventions and Associated Outcome Measures. Crit Care Nurse 2022; 42:13-24. [DOI: 10.4037/ccn2022459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Background
Critical illness survivors have impairments across physical, psychological, and cognitive health domains known as post–intensive care syndrome. Although physical activity can improve outcomes across all health domains, most intensive care unit early mobility studies focus solely on physical outcomes.
Objective
To explore the role of early mobility for adult patients in the intensive care unit by analyzing early mobility intervention studies with physical, psychological, or cognitive outcome measures.
Methods
This integrative review used Whittemore and Knafl’s methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. CINAHL, Embase, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Scopus databases were searched for primary research articles published from 2005 through 2021 on adult intensive care unit early mobility interventions evaluated by physical, cognitive, or psychological outcome measures during or after intervention delivery. Interventions comprising only passive mobility were excluded.
Results
Of 1009 articles screened, 20 were included. Variations in outcome measures, measurement timing, instruments, and control groups made synthesis difficult. No study evaluated an intervention using outcome measures from all 3 health domains. Five studies measured physical and cognitive outcomes; 6 studies measured physical and psychological outcomes.
Conclusion
Early mobility is primarily addressed objectively and unidimensionally, limiting understanding of the implications of early mobility for patients. Post–intensive care syndrome prevention begins in the intensive care unit; early mobility is a promising intervention for targeting multiple risk factors. Studies that measure outcomes in all health domains during or after early mobility are needed to better evaluate the comprehensive effects of early mobility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Bach
- Christina Bach is a PhD student and research assistant at the University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Nursing and a staff nurse and relief lead in the oncology intensive care unit at Nebraska Medicine in Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Breanna Hetland
- Breanna Hetland is an assistant professor at the University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Nursing and a critical nurse scientist at Nebraska Medicine in Omaha
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Describing the Value of Physical Therapy in a Complex System Using the Socio-Ecological Model. JOURNAL OF ACUTE CARE PHYSICAL THERAPY 2022. [DOI: 10.1097/jat.0000000000000209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
9
|
Kang J, Cho YS, Lee M, Yun S, Jeong YJ, Won YH, Hong J, Kim S. Effects of nonpharmacological interventions on sleep improvement and delirium prevention in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust Crit Care 2022:S1036-7314(22)00062-5. [PMID: 35718628 DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Sleep disturbance and delirium are common problems experienced by critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). These interrelated issues increase the length of stay in the ICU but might also negatively affect long-term health outcomes. The objective of this study was to identify the nonpharmacological interventions provided to improve sleep or prevent delirium in ICU patients or both and integrate their effect sizes. REVIEW METHODS This study was a registered systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from their inception until December 2021. We included randomised controlled trials and nonrandomised controlled trials-(RCT) that provided nonpharmacological interventions and reported sleep or delirium as outcome variables. Studies not published in English or whose full text was not available were excluded. The quality of the evidence was assessed with version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for RCTs and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I). RESULTS The systematic review included 118 studies, and the meta-analysis included 100 studies. Overall nonpharmacological interventions had significant effects on subjective sleep quality (standardised mean difference = 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.05 to 0.56), delirium incidence (odds ratio = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.53 to 0.73), and delirium duration (standardised mean difference = -0.68, 95% CI = -0.93 to -0.43). In individual interventions, aromatherapy, music, and massage effectively improved sleep. Exercise, family participation, information giving, cognitive stimulation, bright light therapy, architectural intervention, and bundles/protocols effectively reduced delirium. Light/noise blocking was the only intervention that ensured both sleep improvement and delirium prevention. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest nonpharmacological interventions improve sleep and prevent delirium in ICU patients. We recommend that ICU nurses use nonpharmacological interventions that promote person-environment compatibility in their clinical practice. The results of our review can guide nurses in adopting interventions related to sleep and delirium. PROSPERO REFERENCE NUMBER CRD42021230815.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiyeon Kang
- College of Nursing, Dong-A University, Busan, South Korea
| | - Young Shin Cho
- Department of Nursing, Youngsan University, Gyeongnam, South Korea.
| | - Minju Lee
- Department of Nursing, Youngsan University, Gyeongnam, South Korea.
| | - Seonyoung Yun
- Department of Nursing, Youngsan University, Gyeongnam, South Korea
| | - Yeon Jin Jeong
- Department of Nursing, Dongju College, Busan, South Korea
| | - Youn-Hui Won
- Department of Nursing, Dong-A University Medical Center, Busan, South Korea
| | - Jiwon Hong
- College of Nursing, Dong-A University, Busan, South Korea
| | - Soogyeong Kim
- Surgery Intensive Care Unit, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Burton JK, Craig L, Yong SQ, Siddiqi N, Teale EA, Woodhouse R, Barugh AJ, Shepherd AM, Brunton A, Freeman SC, Sutton AJ, Quinn TJ. Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 11:CD013307. [PMID: 34826144 PMCID: PMC8623130 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013307.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delirium is an acute neuropsychological disorder that is common in hospitalised patients. It can be distressing to patients and carers and it is associated with serious adverse outcomes. Treatment options for established delirium are limited and so prevention of delirium is desirable. Non-pharmacological interventions are thought to be important in delirium prevention. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions designed to prevent delirium in hospitalised patients outside intensive care units (ICU). SEARCH METHODS We searched ALOIS, the specialised register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, with additional searches conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS, Web of Science Core Collection, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization Portal/ICTRP to 16 September 2020. There were no language or date restrictions applied to the electronic searches, and no methodological filters were used to restrict the search. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of single and multicomponent non-pharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised adults cared for outside intensive care or high dependency settings. We only included non-pharmacological interventions which were designed and implemented to prevent delirium. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently examined titles and abstracts identified by the search for eligibility and extracted data from full-text articles. Any disagreements on eligibility and inclusion were resolved by consensus. We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. The primary outcomes were: incidence of delirium; inpatient and later mortality; and new diagnosis of dementia. We included secondary and adverse outcomes as pre-specified in the review protocol. We used risk ratios (RRs) as measures of treatment effect for dichotomous outcomes and between-group mean differences for continuous outcomes. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. A complementary exploratory analysis was undertaker using a Bayesian component network meta-analysis fixed-effect model to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the individual components of multicomponent interventions and describe which components were most strongly associated with reducing the incidence of delirium. MAIN RESULTS We included 22 RCTs that recruited a total of 5718 adult participants. Fourteen trials compared a multicomponent delirium prevention intervention with usual care. Two trials compared liberal and restrictive blood transfusion thresholds. The remaining six trials each investigated a different non-pharmacological intervention. Incidence of delirium was reported in all studies. Using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, we identified risks of bias in all included trials. All were at high risk of performance bias as participants and personnel were not blinded to the interventions. Nine trials were at high risk of detection bias due to lack of blinding of outcome assessors and three more were at unclear risk in this domain. Pooled data showed that multi-component non-pharmacological interventions probably reduce the incidence of delirium compared to usual care (10.5% incidence in the intervention group, compared to 18.4% in the control group, risk ratio (RR) 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46 to 0.71, I2 = 39%; 14 studies; 3693 participants; moderate-certainty evidence, downgraded due to risk of bias). There may be little or no effect of multicomponent interventions on inpatient mortality compared to usual care (5.2% in the intervention group, compared to 4.5% in the control group, RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.74, I2 = 15%; 10 studies; 2640 participants; low-certainty evidence downgraded due to inconsistency and imprecision). No studies of multicomponent interventions reported data on new diagnoses of dementia. Multicomponent interventions may result in a small reduction of around a day in the duration of a delirium episode (mean difference (MD) -0.93, 95% CI -2.01 to 0.14 days, I2 = 65%; 351 participants; low-certainty evidence downgraded due to risk of bias and imprecision). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of multicomponent interventions on delirium severity (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.49, 95% CI -1.13 to 0.14, I2=64%; 147 participants; very low-certainty evidence downgraded due to risk of bias and serious imprecision). Multicomponent interventions may result in a reduction in hospital length of stay compared to usual care (MD -1.30 days, 95% CI -2.56 to -0.04 days, I2=91%; 3351 participants; low-certainty evidence downgraded due to risk of bias and inconsistency), but little to no difference in new care home admission at the time of hospital discharge (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.07; 536 participants; low-certainty evidence downgraded due to risk of bias and imprecision). Reporting of other adverse outcomes was limited. Our exploratory component network meta-analysis found that re-orientation (including use of familiar objects), cognitive stimulation and sleep hygiene were associated with reduced risk of incident delirium. Attention to nutrition and hydration, oxygenation, medication review, assessment of mood and bowel and bladder care were probably associated with a reduction in incident delirium but estimates included the possibility of no benefit or harm. Reducing sensory deprivation, identification of infection, mobilisation and pain control all had summary estimates that suggested potential increases in delirium incidence, but the uncertainty in the estimates was substantial. Evidence from two trials suggests that use of a liberal transfusion threshold over a restrictive transfusion threshold probably results in little to no difference in incident delirium (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.36; I2 = 9%; 294 participants; moderate-certainty evidence downgraded due to risk of bias). Six other interventions were examined, but evidence for each was limited to single studies and we identified no evidence of delirium prevention. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is moderate-certainty evidence regarding the benefit of multicomponent non-pharmacological interventions for the prevention of delirium in hospitalised adults, estimated to reduce incidence by 43% compared to usual care. We found no evidence of an effect on mortality. There is emerging evidence that these interventions may reduce hospital length of stay, with a trend towards reduced delirium duration, although the effect on delirium severity remains uncertain. Further research should focus on implementation and detailed analysis of the components of the interventions to support more effective, tailored practice recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Burton
- Academic Geriatric Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Louise Craig
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Shun Qi Yong
- MVLS, College of Medicine and Veterinary Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Elizabeth A Teale
- Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford, UK
| | - Rebecca Woodhouse
- Department of Health Sciences, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - Amanda J Barugh
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Suzanne C Freeman
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Alex J Sutton
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Terry J Quinn
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sakamoto Y, Morimoto Y, Hanada M, Yano Y, Sawai T, Miura T, Eishi K, Kozu R. Determining Factors for Independent Walking in Patients Undergoing Cardiovascular Surgery: Differences between Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, Heart Valve Surgery, and Aortic Surgery. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:healthcare9111475. [PMID: 34828521 PMCID: PMC8619107 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9111475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Physical deconditioning often occurs during the acute phase after cardiovascular surgery, and unassisted walking is required to achieve independence, to manage cardiac diseases, and to prevent recurrences. This study aims to investigate the characteristics of independent walking after cardiovascular surgery. We conducted a retrospective cohort study in patients who underwent cardiovascular surgeries (total of 567 patients): 153 in the coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) group, 312 in the heart valve surgery group, and 102 in the aortic surgery group. We evaluated the effect of each surgery group on the cardiac rehabilitation (CR) progression. The factors associated with independent walking were age, renal diseases, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and post-operative respiratory complications in the CABG group. In the heart valve surgery group, the factors were New York Heart Association functional classification, renal and respiratory diseases, ICU length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilatory support, and post-operative cardiovascular and respiratory complications. In the aortic surgery group, these were ICU length of stay and acute kidney injury. The CR progression in patients who underwent aortic surgery was significantly longer than those who underwent CABG and heart valve surgery (p < 0.001). New intervention strategies are needed for patients with prolonged ICU stays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yui Sakamoto
- Department of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Science, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki 852-8520, Japan; (Y.S.); (Y.M.); (M.H.); (Y.Y.); (T.S.)
| | - Yosuke Morimoto
- Department of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Science, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki 852-8520, Japan; (Y.S.); (Y.M.); (M.H.); (Y.Y.); (T.S.)
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kobe Gakuin University, Kobe 651-2180, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Hanada
- Department of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Science, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki 852-8520, Japan; (Y.S.); (Y.M.); (M.H.); (Y.Y.); (T.S.)
- Cardiorespiratory Division, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan
| | - Yudai Yano
- Department of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Science, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki 852-8520, Japan; (Y.S.); (Y.M.); (M.H.); (Y.Y.); (T.S.)
- Cardiorespiratory Division, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan
| | - Terumitsu Sawai
- Department of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Science, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki 852-8520, Japan; (Y.S.); (Y.M.); (M.H.); (Y.Y.); (T.S.)
| | - Takashi Miura
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan; (T.M.); (K.E.)
| | - Kiyoyuki Eishi
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan; (T.M.); (K.E.)
| | - Ryo Kozu
- Department of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation Science, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki 852-8520, Japan; (Y.S.); (Y.M.); (M.H.); (Y.Y.); (T.S.)
- Cardiorespiratory Division, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki 852-8501, Japan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +81-95-819-7963
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Burton JK, Craig LE, Yong SQ, Siddiqi N, Teale EA, Woodhouse R, Barugh AJ, Shepherd AM, Brunton A, Freeman SC, Sutton AJ, Quinn TJ. Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 7:CD013307. [PMID: 34280303 PMCID: PMC8407051 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013307.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delirium is an acute neuropsychological disorder that is common in hospitalised patients. It can be distressing to patients and carers and it is associated with serious adverse outcomes. Treatment options for established delirium are limited and so prevention of delirium is desirable. Non-pharmacological interventions are thought to be important in delirium prevention. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions designed to prevent delirium in hospitalised patients outside intensive care units (ICU). SEARCH METHODS We searched ALOIS, the specialised register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, with additional searches conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, LILACS, Web of Science Core Collection, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization Portal/ICTRP to 16 September 2020. There were no language or date restrictions applied to the electronic searches, and no methodological filters were used to restrict the search. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of single and multicomponent non-pharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised adults cared for outside intensive care or high dependency settings. We only included non-pharmacological interventions which were designed and implemented to prevent delirium. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently examined titles and abstracts identified by the search for eligibility and extracted data from full-text articles. Any disagreements on eligibility and inclusion were resolved by consensus. We used standard Cochrane methodological procedures. The primary outcomes were: incidence of delirium; inpatient and later mortality; and new diagnosis of dementia. We included secondary and adverse outcomes as pre-specified in the review protocol. We used risk ratios (RRs) as measures of treatment effect for dichotomous outcomes and between-group mean differences for continuous outcomes. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. A complementary exploratory analysis was undertaker using a Bayesian component network meta-analysis fixed-effect model to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of the individual components of multicomponent interventions and describe which components were most strongly associated with reducing the incidence of delirium. MAIN RESULTS We included 22 RCTs that recruited a total of 5718 adult participants. Fourteen trials compared a multicomponent delirium prevention intervention with usual care. Two trials compared liberal and restrictive blood transfusion thresholds. The remaining six trials each investigated a different non-pharmacological intervention. Incidence of delirium was reported in all studies. Using the Cochrane risk of bias tool, we identified risks of bias in all included trials. All were at high risk of performance bias as participants and personnel were not blinded to the interventions. Nine trials were at high risk of detection bias due to lack of blinding of outcome assessors and three more were at unclear risk in this domain. Pooled data showed that multi-component non-pharmacological interventions probably reduce the incidence of delirium compared to usual care (10.5% incidence in the intervention group, compared to 18.4% in the control group, risk ratio (RR) 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46 to 0.71, I2 = 39%; 14 studies; 3693 participants; moderate-certainty evidence, downgraded due to risk of bias). There may be little or no effect of multicomponent interventions on inpatient mortality compared to usual care (5.2% in the intervention group, compared to 4.5% in the control group, RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.74, I2 = 15%; 10 studies; 2640 participants; low-certainty evidence downgraded due to inconsistency and imprecision). No studies of multicomponent interventions reported data on new diagnoses of dementia. Multicomponent interventions may result in a small reduction of around a day in the duration of a delirium episode (mean difference (MD) -0.93, 95% CI -2.01 to 0.14 days, I2 = 65%; 351 participants; low-certainty evidence downgraded due to risk of bias and imprecision). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of multicomponent interventions on delirium severity (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.49, 95% CI -1.13 to 0.14, I2=64%; 147 participants; very low-certainty evidence downgraded due to risk of bias and serious imprecision). Multicomponent interventions may result in a reduction in hospital length of stay compared to usual care (MD -1.30 days, 95% CI -2.56 to -0.04 days, I2=91%; 3351 participants; low-certainty evidence downgraded due to risk of bias and inconsistency), but little to no difference in new care home admission at the time of hospital discharge (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.07; 536 participants; low-certainty evidence downgraded due to risk of bias and imprecision). Reporting of other adverse outcomes was limited. Our exploratory component network meta-analysis found that re-orientation (including use of familiar objects), cognitive stimulation and sleep hygiene were associated with reduced risk of incident delirium. Attention to nutrition and hydration, oxygenation, medication review, assessment of mood and bowel and bladder care were probably associated with a reduction in incident delirium but estimates included the possibility of no benefit or harm. Reducing sensory deprivation, identification of infection, mobilisation and pain control all had summary estimates that suggested potential increases in delirium incidence, but the uncertainty in the estimates was substantial. Evidence from two trials suggests that use of a liberal transfusion threshold over a restrictive transfusion threshold probably results in little to no difference in incident delirium (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.36; I2 = 9%; 294 participants; moderate-certainty evidence downgraded due to risk of bias). Six other interventions were examined, but evidence for each was limited to single studies and we identified no evidence of delirium prevention. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is moderate-certainty evidence regarding the benefit of multicomponent non-pharmacological interventions for the prevention of delirium in hospitalised adults, estimated to reduce incidence by 43% compared to usual care. We found no evidence of an effect on mortality. There is emerging evidence that these interventions may reduce hospital length of stay, with a trend towards reduced delirium duration, although the effect on delirium severity remains uncertain. Further research should focus on implementation and detailed analysis of the components of the interventions to support more effective, tailored practice recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer K Burton
- Academic Geriatric Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Louise E Craig
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Shun Qi Yong
- MVLS, College of Medicine and Veterinary Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Najma Siddiqi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Elizabeth A Teale
- Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Bradford, UK
| | - Rebecca Woodhouse
- Department of Health Sciences, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - Amanda J Barugh
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Suzanne C Freeman
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Alex J Sutton
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Terry J Quinn
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Elango M, Papalois V. Working towards an ERAS Protocol for Pancreatic Transplantation: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2021; 10:1418. [PMID: 33915899 PMCID: PMC8036565 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10071418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) initially started in the early 2000s as a series of protocols to improve the perioperative care of surgical patients. They aimed to increase patient satisfaction while reducing postoperative complications and postoperative length of stay. Despite these protocols being widely adopted in many fields of surgery, they are yet to be adopted in pancreatic transplantation: a high-risk surgery with often prolonged length of postoperative stay and high rate of complications. We have analysed the literature in pancreatic and transplantation surgery to identify the necessary preoperative, intra-operative and postoperative components of an ERAS pathway in pancreas transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhivanan Elango
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK;
| | | |
Collapse
|