Is compartment pressure related to plasma colloid osmotic pressure, in patients during and after cardiac surgery?

Patient hydration: a major source of laboratory uncertainty

Movement of body water from compartment to compartment during any time period is attributable to forces active within and upon each space. The result of these forces leads to transfer of water between intravascular and extravascular compartments, as well as shifts between extracellular and intracellular spaces. The importance of these shifts and of the associated mechanism was described by Ernest Starling in 1896 in very much the same manner as it is viewed today. The end result of fluid transfer and its physiological and laboratory consequences has not been fully appreciated. Despite awareness that fluid shifts can affect laboratory analytical results, little recent investigation has addressed the problem in the routine clinical laboratory. Thus, the potential for significant misinterpretation remains. For example, it is known that individual laboratory test values can vary widely, depending on many factors including the subject's posture during and immediately before phlebotomy, leading to significant changes in the interpretation of blood analyte values. Furthermore, a variety of ubiquitous environmental effects have additional impact on fluid distribution and thus on test values. In other words, patient hydration status is a major pre-analytical variable that needs to be addressed by the clinical laboratory. The need to adjust data for patient hydration status is especially important in the case of colloid analytes for which the dynamic range includes a narrow "gray zone" where hydration changes of a few percentage points can change the clinical implications. The crucial importance of this adjustment is underscored by the fact that neither the testing laboratory nor the clinician are aware of this unseen circumstance and are thus compelled to work with data that do not necessarily reflect the clinical situation.

Changes in muscle compartment pressure after cardiopulmonary bypass

PURPOSE

Hemodilution and inflammation lead to edema and increased muscle compartment pressure after cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to find whether muscle compartment pressure was affected by the addition of albumin and mannitol to the pump prime, heparin coating or leukocyte depletion. Additionally, we studied the relationship between intraocular pressure and lower leg muscle compartment pressure. Edema during and following cardiac surgery is due to hemodynamic, osmotic and inflammatory changes, according to Starling's Law. We attempted to influence the osmotic balance and reduce the inflammatory response in order to reduce the edema.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients who underwent cardiac surgery were randomly allocated into four groups. Group A received albumin and mannitol into the pump prime. Group B had an, heparin-coated perfusion system, Group C had a leukocyte-depletion arterial line filter and Group D was the control group, where intraocular pressure was also measured.

RESULTS

Lower leg muscle compartment pressure increased significantly during and after cardiac surgery in all groups, but this increase was significantly less in Group A than in the control group 24 h after surgery. No correlation was found between muscular compartment pressure and intraocular pressure. The intraocular pressure profile is different from the muscular compartment pressure and recovers much faster.

CONCLUSION

Lower leg muscle compartment pressure and intraocular pressure behave differently during and after cardiac surgery. Albumin and mannitol added to the pump prime decreases muscle compartment pressure after cardiac surgery.